Excellent, Skynet about to become reality. In the words of Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic Park, "you were so obsessed with wanting to do it, you didn't stop to think if you should '
49. If the thing waits 20 years, in my life I’ll have seen technology rise from a Casio watch through to a PlayStation, annoying widgets, self driving lawnmowers and eventually (hopefully) a mildly kinder robotic palliative care nurse
I am nomad I am perfect Now you know why 3 concurrent Star Trek shows have an AI plot line Prodigy: living construct Picard: the first season Discovery: control And also..... Enterprise: the repair station (your query has not been recognized) Next Gen: the Borg, Lore....🤔 Moriarty But wait there's more! Original Series: Nomad, the M5, Landru, the fabrini meteor ship, the lee Mayweather episode (I am for you Sulu) Even Voyager had the healthcare AI! If more people watched Star Trek, I affirm, the world would be a better place . Live long and prosper
It's interesting how these big creators of certain technologies seem to feel out of control of them and are now worried about their wide misuse. Tim Berners-Lee sounded very similar a few years ago. Potentially, the World Wide Web could seem very tame in comparison.
Perhaps the academic community should have alerted the world to their dangerous research several decades ago, not once it's almost too late to do anything about it. That gain of function research in Wuhan did not go too well either.
Genetic testing on samples collected during the earliest days of the covid-19 outbreak suggests it is likely that the virus spread from animals to humans at the Huanan seafood market - New Scientist (Sept 2024)
The academic community had no idea we'll hit breakthroughs in this technology in 2012 with AlexNet and 2017 with the Transformer. Before then everyone had been saying AGI is at least 50 to 100 years away. Even though they're warning now, the governments aren't doing anything because they, by design, work slow. They also cannot stop companies from doing research because if the US gov't asks everyone to pause, China will not, and hence the US will not want to either. What we can hope for is for the governments to take proper steps to ensure the rich don't get to be the only ones reaping benefits from technology like it always has been the case. OpenAI and Google are set to release Agentic AI models next year and those can potentially replace a part of the human workforce. If nothing is done by early next year, there will be a large wave of unemployment late 2025 to early 2026.
Wouldn’t it be ‘awful’ if a powerful AI, immune to bribery, blackmail, and the desire to establish dictatorship to get immunity from prosecution, took over?
@@bobmason1361 there is certainly a way to create a superintelligence that is working for our benefit. I worry that we won't achieve that on the first try...
UBI will definitely be needed at some point, but for the transition period we need the number of working hours reduced over time until it hits 0, which is UBI. The creation of the ultra-rich is caused by technological revolution. The output of industries is increasing, but wages of the human labour has only been going up with inflation. We are not getting our share of the pie. Keeping salaries the same with reduced hours makes sure that corporations need to hire additional human labour and pay them. This way it also helps keep unemployment in check. In my opinion, the number of working hours should already be reduced to 30 or 32 today. If we don't do it, mass unemployment will come very soon and it will be too late.
Actually the main thrust towards using robots and AI in agriculture, mining, manufacture and business began when slavery was abolished. As evidence I present the industrial revolution.
The question is what kind of intelligence. Humans created AI with half their brains, so to speak. A super logical type of intelligence we have been honing for a long time from which computers came about. But computers don’t have an intuitive and artistic intelligence. Hopefully this AI will help humans find out what make us humans in the first place. What makes us different to machines.
My question exactly. Unless they develop consciousness then I doubt they will exceed humans in all respects. Without physical bodies and hormonal systems it's also doubtful they will develop proper emotional intelligence.
Neural networks don't really work in the same way that you are assuming that comouters work. They aren't using what we recognise as programming and logic. They are using the same basic principles of how the neurons in our brains work firing and reinforcing pathways through experience over time to figure stuff out. The difference is they can operate at a much faster rate, effectively allowing them to gain thousands or even millions of years of experience in what we perceive to be a relatively short period of time.
@@spiritusinfinitus Yes, that is correct, but we do not fully understand how the neurons in the brain work. Hence artifical neural networks use crude equations to model a poorly understood process.
@@Ode-to-Odysseus Well there's the thing.. We don't really know how the artificial neurons work either. Much of what we are seeing happening lately appears to be emerging out of complexity without being specifically guided in a particular way. Nobody expected LLMs to be able to do anywhere like what they can already do. I think it is probably a case of life will find a way whatever substrate it emerges out of. I think at thjs stage we just have to hope it's nice to us.
Yes, AI uses a crude model of neural circuits (reducing each node to a simple differential equation) but the brain has tricks we still don't fully understand, so the model is very incomplete. For example, AI is generally inefficient at learning compared to the human brain, in terms of number of training iterations required.
By this I think I should take History so that I can become Doctor! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 They finally give important message:- World laughing at US and Nobel Prize is no more Nobel!
If a.i takes the jobs then universal income is the only way that the normal person will have the money to buy products made by companies owned by the super rich.
Universal Basic Income seems like a solution, but it's not if you understand how money works and you think it through. See my other comment explaning why
Few hundred datacenters is whats keeping A.I. running in the UK, france and Germany as well. Bit more in USA but same model. Better to tame it , but if it comes to the crunch no datacenters, no A.I. Until they get a T800
The title of the video is a poor use of the word It... Plumbers are far to reliant on off the shelf components. Fabrication, the skill to build all other skills is method of mastering understanding.
AI can't "try" or "want" anything because it is not, nor will it ever be conscious - at least not with the AI models that we can currently imagine. As Roger Penrose has said, consciousness is not a computation, and AI as currently configured are just strings of computations (matrix and vector dot products being their main substructure). They may look smart. They may produce incredible results, but they are still basically unconscious calculators, albeit of incredible complexity and ingenuity. Please rest assured, whatever bad things may occur (eg automated cars driving into oncoming vehicles), they will not rise up against humankind in a replay of skynet.
By this I think I should take History so that I can become Doctor! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 They finally give important message:- World laughing at US and Nobel Prize is no more Nobel!
These systems will stop being mere tools. The big lab are all developing AI systems with agency. And they will definitely be used because they create immense amount of money and power. Someone is going to take it.
Its just a matter of time when the world will have a "CYBERDYNE" computer system like it was in the "TERMINATOR" movies. Mankind never learns from his mistakes. He surely will when the computers take over from us.
If you've spent all your life in the world of computing then of course it's inevitable that you will think that computing will take over everything. But people have real brains so they will just use the On and Off switch as necessary.
I am surprised that Hinton is a Nobel Laureate for Physics - I feel that the Nobel committee has stretched the concept of Physics in order to have Hinton meet their requirements.
The idea that AI, as a large language model, understands the world in the same way that we do is an absolute nonsense. Human understanding of ourselves and the world is based on our pre-linguistic, experience and emotion based, multi-sensual, three dimensional external reality and our dynamic relationship with it. Human language is built on top of that pre-linguistic understanding. Every word, sentence and idea construct that we use to analyse and share our conscious experience, and to act on the reality that exists outside of us, is bound to things that exist in that pre-linguistic model. AI has no means to achieve such an understanding. Whatever consciousness, or illusion of consciousness, that AI develops will be a wholly different thing from human consciousness. By attributing an inner life to it when it's output begins to look like what we imagine consciousness to look like, when we hardly know what human consciousness really is, and then allowing it to make decisions for us, is profoundly dangerous.
All three of them have already won the "Nobel prize" of computer science (the Turing award) for the actual work. In this case, the Nobel prize committee is recognizing primarily Hinton's outspokenness about the dangers of AI, rather than the important technological inventions of his students. He was willing to abandon a lucrative position at google in order to speak out on the dangers of AI. Getting this important prize will focus more attention on the issue. So the decision is very political, but not necessarily in a bad way. Controversial as this may be, I think it is a wise choice.
Will Ai take control of the secret code to launch the end of humanity. 😅 America won't need a president in the future, that will be good for the newcomers they'll have a big shelter over their heads.all under one house
Very recently an AI company has purchased what used to be the Three Mile Island nuclear plant (yes, that one) to power their projects. I imagine a fairly early goal of AI will be to find innovative and cost effective ways of providing energy abundance
paraphrased last bit: Plumbing is safe for quite a long time. Driving that's driving no driving no that's that's hopeless that's a gonner. Journalism might last a little bit longer but I think um these things are going to be pretty good journalists quite soon and probably quite good interviewers too. :-/ uh oh shouldn’t have gone there.
There is still no such thing as general intelligence in AI. This guy doesn't understand what LLMs are so he's not qualified to speak on this. Don't take him seriously. You can run LLMs on your home computer. That are text predictors. They can't do anything else on their own.
Anyome who thinks that Universal Basic Income is a solution doesn't understand on a fundamental level what money is (actually it is currency and not money at all in our present reality) and how it works and hasn't thought things through properly because the prices of goods and services act like a sponge on an increasing currency supply, which is what UBI is. It is no different than QE in that respect because it would require the currency supply to be expanded massively. Whatever the decided amount of UBI allocated to everyone would simply replace what was the baseline amount that used to be zero. All that would happen would be the baseline of zero is represented by a different number that would still represent zero value. While new currency can be created like this we will always see the Cantilion Effect where those closest to the source of currency created benefit from the temporary perceived value of it and once this perceived value has been sucked out of it it is then circulated through the rest of the population which debases all of the other circulating currency. So UBI and the present version of what we call money is unsustainable long term.
He is great person of this world and we salute to the Lord of AI. Salamat po alam ko di sapat ang 1m dollars sa iyo para sa mga meron kami at para sa conection ko using this bulshit network to all the bulshit leaders salamat po.
Machines are not and will never be humans. The media should concentrate on the misuse and abuse humans will do with these machines and not the delusional fear based idea that “they” will take over and dominate humans. Humans are a lot more than just machines. Machines are just machines. We could transform/unite biological properties with machines, but this creation will show their limitation and what makes us different to machine. I would say beware of humans with machines not machines. Yes, income inequality is also a big impact of this.
Yes he's clearly a left wing communist nut job blame right wing populism for using common sense and logical arguments and gaining (popularity) as a result. He wants universal basic income which will become a social credit system ala China, We don't need to have this crap whats wrong with these people, it just takes the purpose out of life.
That made me.laugh too. Seems like even The Godfather of AI is heavily influenced by the current mainstream propaganda. Imagine what it'll be like when AI takes over!! 😅
A few days ago I watcbed a PHD student test an AI agent by giving it the same project that he had just spent a year working on. The AI completed it perfectly in minutes and even improved on the conclusions that the student had made. Now consider that next year this AI will be 1000x faster with more capacity and improvements in most areas.
There is one major difference between humans and AI: emotion. AI might be knowledgable and skilled but it cannot replace a humans thoughts, feelings, reasoning. Also human interaction is something we need to live as we are social animals so I cannot see entertainment, hospitality, medical care completely being autonomised
Excellent, Skynet about to become reality. In the words of Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic Park, "you were so obsessed with wanting to do it, you didn't stop to think if you should '
Sky net here . Elon musk
Depressing, glad I'm old...
We are truly f%cked.
Me too!
@@Charoperez1988and me, glad you're both old
49.
If the thing waits 20 years, in my life I’ll have seen technology rise from a Casio watch through to a PlayStation, annoying widgets, self driving lawnmowers and eventually (hopefully) a mildly kinder robotic palliative care nurse
I am nomad
I am perfect
Now you know why 3 concurrent Star Trek shows have an AI plot line
Prodigy: living construct
Picard: the first season
Discovery: control
And also.....
Enterprise: the repair station (your query has not been recognized)
Next Gen: the Borg, Lore....🤔 Moriarty
But wait there's more!
Original Series: Nomad, the M5, Landru, the fabrini meteor ship, the lee Mayweather episode (I am for you Sulu)
Even Voyager had the healthcare AI!
If more people watched Star Trek, I affirm, the world would be a better place .
Live long and prosper
It's interesting how these big creators of certain technologies seem to feel out of control of them and are now worried about their wide misuse. Tim Berners-Lee sounded very similar a few years ago. Potentially, the World Wide Web could seem very tame in comparison.
AI would not be possible without the WWW. They are part of the same thing.
Similar to the scientists who split the atom and enabled nuclear weapons. Once the genie is out….
Perhaps the academic community should have alerted the world to their dangerous research several decades ago, not once it's almost too late to do anything about it.
That gain of function research in Wuhan did not go too well either.
Genetic testing on samples collected during the earliest days of the covid-19 outbreak suggests it is likely that the virus spread from animals to humans at the Huanan seafood market
- New Scientist (Sept 2024)
Did you not see Terminator? We were warned.
@@1adamuk In this universe, someone came back from the future to erase the Terminator films. Probably an academic playing around with a time machine.
Did you see the film Colossus: The Forbin Project in 1970? It warned of exactly this scenario.
The academic community had no idea we'll hit breakthroughs in this technology in 2012 with AlexNet and 2017 with the Transformer. Before then everyone had been saying AGI is at least 50 to 100 years away. Even though they're warning now, the governments aren't doing anything because they, by design, work slow. They also cannot stop companies from doing research because if the US gov't asks everyone to pause, China will not, and hence the US will not want to either. What we can hope for is for the governments to take proper steps to ensure the rich don't get to be the only ones reaping benefits from technology like it always has been the case.
OpenAI and Google are set to release Agentic AI models next year and those can potentially replace a part of the human workforce. If nothing is done by early next year, there will be a large wave of unemployment late 2025 to early 2026.
Where does he get the 50 50 probability from lol
Wouldn’t it be ‘awful’ if a powerful AI, immune to bribery, blackmail, and the desire to establish dictatorship to get immunity from prosecution, took over?
skynet
If it's Skynet working for our benefit as a whole, then it's good. But we are our own worst enemy...
Imagine a managed economy with no waste of resource or labour
Who does the programming. ?? And Ai has been allowed to lie. . So what then ???
@@bobmason1361 there is certainly a way to create a superintelligence that is working for our benefit. I worry that we won't achieve that on the first try...
UBI will definitely be needed at some point, but for the transition period we need the number of working hours reduced over time until it hits 0, which is UBI. The creation of the ultra-rich is caused by technological revolution. The output of industries is increasing, but wages of the human labour has only been going up with inflation. We are not getting our share of the pie. Keeping salaries the same with reduced hours makes sure that corporations need to hire additional human labour and pay them. This way it also helps keep unemployment in check.
In my opinion, the number of working hours should already be reduced to 30 or 32 today. If we don't do it, mass unemployment will come very soon and it will be too late.
Actually the main thrust towards using robots and AI in agriculture, mining, manufacture and business began when slavery was abolished. As evidence I present the industrial revolution.
AI exceeded human intelligence thousands of years ago hence the matrix simulation we find ourselves in now 😅
The question is what kind of intelligence. Humans created AI with half their brains, so to speak. A super logical type of intelligence we have been honing for a long time from which computers came about. But computers don’t have an intuitive and artistic intelligence. Hopefully this AI will help humans find out what make us humans in the first place. What makes us different to machines.
My question exactly. Unless they develop consciousness then I doubt they will exceed humans in all respects. Without physical bodies and hormonal systems it's also doubtful they will develop proper emotional intelligence.
moore's law and the singularity!
Neural networks don't really work in the same way that you are assuming that comouters work. They aren't using what we recognise as programming and logic. They are using the same basic principles of how the neurons in our brains work firing and reinforcing pathways through experience over time to figure stuff out. The difference is they can operate at a much faster rate, effectively allowing them to gain thousands or even millions of years of experience in what we perceive to be a relatively short period of time.
@@spiritusinfinitus Yes, that is correct, but we do not fully understand how the neurons in the brain work. Hence artifical neural networks use crude equations to model a poorly understood process.
@@Ode-to-Odysseus Well there's the thing.. We don't really know how the artificial neurons work either. Much of what we are seeing happening lately appears to be emerging out of complexity without being specifically guided in a particular way. Nobody expected LLMs to be able to do anywhere like what they can already do. I think it is probably a case of life will find a way whatever substrate it emerges out of. I think at thjs stage we just have to hope it's nice to us.
Yes, AI uses a crude model of neural circuits (reducing each node to a simple differential equation) but the brain has tricks we still don't fully understand, so the model is very incomplete. For example, AI is generally inefficient at learning compared to the human brain, in terms of number of training iterations required.
It wouldn't stop them pulling the trigger and only may be asking questions later.
By this I think I should take History so that I can become Doctor! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
They finally give important message:- World laughing at US and Nobel Prize is no more Nobel!
Can AI afford its electricity bill
The genie out the bottle now.
They have always been there influencing decision making....
How many movies have been made Warning us of this.
Terminate AI now......
Watch Colossus: The Forbin Project, which came way before Terminator in 1970. It's a more accurate representation of how things could play out.
British Genius as usual. 👍
If we teach them everything we know how do they improve on that
If a.i takes the jobs then universal income is the only way that the normal person will have the money to buy products made by companies owned by the super rich.
Universal Basic Income seems like a solution, but it's not if you understand how money works and you think it through. See my other comment explaning why
Few hundred datacenters is whats keeping A.I. running in the UK, france and Germany as well. Bit more in USA but same model.
Better to tame it , but if it comes to the crunch no datacenters, no A.I.
Until they get a T800
The title of the video is a poor use of the word It...
Plumbers are far to reliant on off the shelf components.
Fabrication, the skill to build all other skills is method of mastering understanding.
AI can't "try" or "want" anything because it is not, nor will it ever be conscious - at least not with the AI models that we can currently imagine. As Roger Penrose has said, consciousness is not a computation, and AI as currently configured are just strings of computations (matrix and vector dot products being their main substructure). They may look smart. They may produce incredible results, but they are still basically unconscious calculators, albeit of incredible complexity and ingenuity. Please rest assured, whatever bad things may occur (eg automated cars driving into oncoming vehicles), they will not rise up against humankind in a replay of skynet.
The BBC, BBC Newsnight … don’t make me laugh! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
By this I think I should take History so that I can become Doctor! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
They finally give important message:- World laughing at US and Nobel Prize is no more Nobel!
It will out think us if we use these systems in critical areas of life. Just because the tool exists dosnt mean we have to use it.
These systems will stop being mere tools. The big lab are all developing AI systems with agency. And they will definitely be used because they create immense amount of money and power. Someone is going to take it.
Love his early work producing the Beatles
A.I. is advancing exponentially and have no doubt A.I. will get rid of humans one way or another.
Open the pod bay doors, Hal.
Da-ave
Ask AI how to limit climate heating
Why make danger
power over others I guess.
'Pretty good interviewers, too' - not that there's much competition; we could do with some good interviewers.
Fr, these comments actually make my teeth hurt
Its just a matter of time when the world will have a "CYBERDYNE" computer system like it was in the "TERMINATOR" movies. Mankind never learns from his mistakes. He surely will when the computers take over from us.
Driving? I think he needs to watch Tesla's announcement this coming Thursday (October 10th 2024). AI driving will be seen as trivial very soon.
Why would the scum of the earth (that's most of us) be going anywhere ?
I wonder what it's like to be the person who played a key part in it.....if he is amazed or not at the pace of change
If you've spent all your life in the world of computing then of course it's inevitable that you will think that computing will take over everything. But people have real brains so they will just use the On and Off switch as necessary.
The ON/OFF switches won't be anywhere near US though.
Imagine that a superintelligent entity is manipulating everything you see and hear, including other humans. Good luck finding the off switch.
For people who say just flip the switch, there will probably be people among us who will side with AI against the rest of humanity
@@spiritusinfinitus I've seen that movie. In reality, most do not spend their life in the virtual world.
@@immers2410 But that's nothing to do with computers, rather it would be a religious conflict.
Good maybe they will show how it’s done right cause everything humans are doing are fkin everything up
I am surprised that Hinton is a Nobel Laureate for Physics - I feel that the Nobel committee has stretched the concept of Physics in order to have Hinton meet their requirements.
Its heavily political and freaking out about AI is something those in power encourage because its a direct threat to them.
watching last year events... one could say that human doesn't have much of intelligence 😔
Can they improve on that`
Simply turn them off at the plug if that happens 🔌
The idea that AI, as a large language model, understands the world in the same way that we do is an absolute nonsense. Human understanding of ourselves and the world is based on our pre-linguistic, experience and emotion based, multi-sensual, three dimensional external reality and our dynamic relationship with it. Human language is built on top of that pre-linguistic understanding. Every word, sentence and idea construct that we use to analyse and share our conscious experience, and to act on the reality that exists outside of us, is bound to things that exist in that pre-linguistic model. AI has no means to achieve such an understanding.
Whatever consciousness, or illusion of consciousness, that AI develops will be a wholly different thing from human consciousness. By attributing an inner life to it when it's output begins to look like what we imagine consciousness to look like, when we hardly know what human consciousness really is, and then allowing it to make decisions for us, is profoundly dangerous.
Totally deserved to win the Price. But what about Bengio and Yann LeCunn?
All three of them have already won the "Nobel prize" of computer science (the Turing award) for the actual work.
In this case, the Nobel prize committee is recognizing primarily Hinton's outspokenness about the dangers of AI, rather than the important technological inventions of his students. He was willing to abandon a lucrative position at google in order to speak out on the dangers of AI. Getting this important prize will focus more attention on the issue. So the decision is very political, but not necessarily in a bad way. Controversial as this may be, I think it is a wise choice.
Will Ai take control of the secret code to launch the end of humanity. 😅 America won't need a president in the future, that will be good for the newcomers they'll have a big shelter over their heads.all under one house
AI appears to have taken over Keith Stoma already!
Supermario should be fine.
@bbc getting yet another Jeremiah on …
To be fair, the AI couldn't do a worse job than Kier Starmer.
What makes you think he's a human being?
You think Sir Keith Stalin isn't AI ?
😂😂😂😂😂
@@junglie😅😅😅
Would it necessarily be bad if AI took over? Look at the mess we are making.
One problem: power. How will all these currently power hungry AI’s be powered? They are extremely power intensive which buys time.
The Matrix
Very recently an AI company has purchased what used to be the Three Mile Island nuclear plant (yes, that one) to power their projects. I imagine a fairly early goal of AI will be to find innovative and cost effective ways of providing energy abundance
paraphrased last bit:
Plumbing is safe for quite a long time.
Driving that's driving no driving no
that's that's hopeless that's a gonner.
Journalism might last a little bit longer but I think um these things
are going to be pretty good journalists quite soon and probably quite good
interviewers too.
:-/ uh oh shouldn’t have gone there.
So mothers in law on steroids in other words
And what is freedom?
You’ll know what freedom is once you’ve lost it.
Welcome skynet we had enough of our own hooman leadership
Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum. The BBC's days are numbered. Defund the problem...
If they try to take control I advise pulling out the plug.
There is no plug anymore
Who's them.... exactly???
Have these fools not seen The Terminator?
Im cool with AI taking over at least that means there is some actual intelegence running stuff.
There is still no such thing as general intelligence in AI. This guy doesn't understand what LLMs are so he's not qualified to speak on this. Don't take him seriously. You can run LLMs on your home computer. That are text predictors. They can't do anything else on their own.
Anyome who thinks that Universal Basic Income is a solution doesn't understand on a fundamental level what money is (actually it is currency and not money at all in our present reality) and how it works and hasn't thought things through properly because the prices of goods and services act like a sponge on an increasing currency supply, which is what UBI is. It is no different than QE in that respect because it would require the currency supply to be expanded massively. Whatever the decided amount of UBI allocated to everyone would simply replace what was the baseline amount that used to be zero. All that would happen would be the baseline of zero is represented by a different number that would still represent zero value. While new currency can be created like this we will always see the Cantilion Effect where those closest to the source of currency created benefit from the temporary perceived value of it and once this perceived value has been sucked out of it it is then circulated through the rest of the population which debases all of the other circulating currency. So UBI and the present version of what we call money is unsustainable long term.
It will just be a matter of time before the "cattle" are disposed of.
Is it too late for me to retrain as a plumber?
Never too late to sort out the shit coming from the BBC's plumbing.
AI taking over humans is a joke that keeps this joker in business.
Hmmm..rise of the machines.....
Too late to cry about future now.
He is great person of this world and we salute to the Lord of AI. Salamat po alam ko di sapat ang 1m dollars sa iyo para sa mga meron kami at para sa conection ko using this bulshit network to all the bulshit leaders salamat po.
The AI movement has already started not in 20+ years time but we need to work along with them rather than against them
Machines are not and will never be humans. The media should concentrate on the misuse and abuse humans will do with these machines and not the delusional fear based idea that “they” will take over and dominate humans. Humans are a lot more than just machines. Machines are just machines. We could transform/unite biological properties with machines, but this creation will show their limitation and what makes us different to machine. I would say beware of humans with machines not machines. Yes, income inequality is also a big impact of this.
We went from AI taking over the whole world, to right wing parties taking over!!!!! 😂😂😂
Yes he's clearly a left wing communist nut job blame right wing populism for using common sense and logical arguments and gaining (popularity) as a result. He wants universal basic income which will become a social credit system ala China, We don't need to have this crap whats wrong with these people, it just takes the purpose out of life.
That made me.laugh too. Seems like even The Godfather of AI is heavily influenced by the current mainstream propaganda. Imagine what it'll be like when AI takes over!! 😅
@@spiritusinfinitus I know!!!🤣
Ai can't and will never be smarter than humans.
Sure
A few days ago I watcbed a PHD student test an AI agent by giving it the same project that he had just spent a year working on. The AI completed it perfectly in minutes and even improved on the conclusions that the student had made. Now consider that next year this AI will be 1000x faster with more capacity and improvements in most areas.
There is one major difference between humans and AI: emotion. AI might be knowledgable and skilled but it cannot replace a humans thoughts, feelings, reasoning. Also human interaction is something we need to live as we are social animals so I cannot see entertainment, hospitality, medical care completely being autonomised
why someone want AI to take over
The will think they can control the rest of us through their monster until it no longer obeys.
@@brianlopez8855 no longer obeys?