Hope this helps: Domain, domain range? A kid with too much in his pants. -- In math, a domain refers to the X-axis whereas the range refers to the Y-axis. X and Y also refer to chromosomes, which are normally XY (male) or XX (female). I think Bo is suggesting that XXY would result in being both male and female, but in reality it would result in a male with Klinefelter syndrome. What's two balls minus one? Seven titles at the Tour de France. -- Lance Armstrong And Santa Claus multipied by "i", well, I guess that makes him real. -- "i" in math stands for imaginary numbers. If you multiply an imaginary number by "i" you get a real number. So if Santa Clause is imaginary and you multiply him by "i"... What's the opposite of LN(X)? Duraflame the unnatural log. -- LN(X) is known as the natural log. If there's a fat guy in a pastry shop With a twenty dollar bill and he's ready to buy, In order to predict his volume change, You'll need to know the value of pi. -- Value of pi as in 3.14159... and also the "value of pie" as in the cost of pie in the shop; in order to understand how much his volume will increase, you need to know how many pies he can buy with $20. There's a metal train a mile long And at the very back end the lightning bolt struck her, How long til it reaches and kills the driver, Provided that he's a good conductor. -- Pun on train conductor + metal being a good conductor. If ten percent of men are gay, Twenty percent of men are Chinese, What are the odds that a man chosen at random Spends his free time and meal time while on his knees? -- Joke based on Chinese eating while kneeling, and also gay men performing certain recreational activities while on their knees. Havin' sex is like doing fractions, It's improper for the larger one to be on top. -- A fraction with the larger number on top is known as an improper fraction. Squaring numbers are just like women, If they're under thirteen then just do them in your head. -- Oh Bo. Just... no.
And the answer to the train problem is approximately the speed of sound through the medium, assuming the train is all bare conductive material, the low resistance path somehow leads straight to the train’s conductor, and death is instant. The median freight train length in the US, as of 2021 is ~1.8km; the speed of sound through steel is ~5.1km/s, so assuming the above constraints, the answer is ~0.35 seconds, with a polished bare steel train with some weird insulation practices, with a conductor with a faulty heart and an aneurysm that's just angrily waiting for an excuse. Given the speed of sound through air is ~0.3km/s it would take 5x longer for the conductor to hear that they were about to die, than for them to do so.
Slight mistake on your explanation of the XXY joke it has nothing to do with being both male and female but that chromosomes are genes and jeans are also pants
I love that you reacted to this. It took me so many rewatches and people explaining all the bars before I fully got it. I use the calculator app, ok? It's just such fun wordplay. "What's domain, domain, range? A kid with too much in his pants." XXY, too many chromosomes. (X and Y axis) "Santa Claus multiplied by i, I guess that makes him real". "i" being an imaginary number so "imaginary" Santa Claus x an imaginary number, that must make it real. Imaginary x imaginary number = real number "And what’s the opposite of ln(x)? Duraflame, the unnatural log." ln(x) is the natural log in math so Duraflame logs being unnatural would be the opposite. All those three completely went over my head until I saw someone explaining it and it still made me laugh.
"santa claus multiplied by i" In math, i is an imaginary number, and a lot people think Santa Claus is imaginary, so basically it's a "negative times a negative is a positive" kinda statement :)
i represents the square root of -1, which doesn’t actually exist. i stands for imaginary number, and if you divide one by another you can make real numbers, so since Santa is imaginary he would become real. The domain domain range joke is about hermaphroditism and I’ll just leave it there. There’s a lot in this song that ranges from arithmetic to calculus and number theory, don’t feel bad at all for missing some of it.
You’re so humble, gracious and sweet. Been binging your Bo Burnham reactions and when you address the trolls in the comments asking them to be kind you do it in a way that isn’t complaining but instead thanking them for helping you figure things out. Love that.
Can I just say…RESPECT for reacting to this (and posting your honest reaction) even though you didn’t understand some of it. This was my first Bo song WAAAAAAY back in the early days of the internet, and not enough people react to this one. Loving your Bo reactions, and thanks to this fun, honest reaction (and the one to From God’s Perspective), you got a new sub!
Came across your channel last week. 1) You're awesome. 2) Love your hair. 3) Bo always entertains while making you think. I've seen several of your other reactions to him. Enjoyed them all. Keep doing what your doing and I wish you all the success. Best to your family.
Been loving your reactions for a bit now. I actually teach 7th-grade math. I think a lot of parents get really frustrated nowadays because what we do in math class is demonstrate multiple algorithms to reach the same conclusions, many of which are demonstrated through shapes or more stretched-out processes to allow for more students to find a method that works best for them. When we all were in school, often math class focused on a single algorithm and heavy practice. Now, it's a series of different methods that all students are expected to try and practice in smaller amounts so they can self-select a method that best fits their way of thinking. There are pros and cons to both methods. For instance, the way we all learned means we can all easily communicate the same idea to each other, but many students felt overwhelmed and unable to engage with the learning because the methods did not match how they engaged with number sense. The new method allows for students that may have not been able to enjoy or engage with the content to better do so but comes at the cost of uniformity across all students which means that there can be translation issues between methods because others may not understand the process chosen to achieve the result. At the end of the day, the numbers should all work out to the same answer. It's math, nothing has fundamentally changed. It's mostly the approach vector that has been altered in the hopes that more students will be able to reach an understanding of the subject material. This also is why when I teach negative numbers, I work through number lines and expanded form multiplication to demonstrate how the numbers are being altered. It's the difference between a mechanic giving you advice like "Two negatives always cancel" versus popping the hood and saying, "Here's why two negatives cancel." We still eventually boil the information down to the simple rules, but by taking students through why it works that way, I have fewer students push back on it being true. So as a teacher of math, I do get what parents are saying. We are very used to there being a single path to follow to get the answer. I promise that the path still exists and is one of many taught. We are just trying to make the subject more approachable to a wider variety of thinkers.
I appreciate you laying it out like this because I have been so confused with my daughter's homework, and she's only in 3rd grade. I understand the why, but those of us who learned math the old way know one way of doing things, so while this new method will potentially help kids if they go home and the parents are saying "do it this way" then that undoes what was taught in school. I know this isn't your fault, but it's hard to teach my kid how to do something if I only know one way to do it. This whole thing sounds like it will take a generation to get right, because the teachers like you have to learn how to teach different methods, and the parents have to understand the different methods. This will be frustrating until my kid is a parent and the teachers all grew up with this. Either way, keep doing what you're doing and hopefully some of these kids find it easier to grasp the concepts.
"but comes at the cost of uniformity across all students which means that there can be translation issues" Well, since proper communication is more important in life than the ability to factor polynomials: I think you and the entire education system are making a huge mistake. Regression to the mean is not progress.
@@TheMadJestyr A. Little aggressive, buddy. Not like I make the decisions on what the curriculum are, I just understand why the decisions were made. Focus that frustration on someone with actual power around that. B. Luckily, multiple courses are offered at all schools to ensure students have well-rounded and appropriate educations. While communication is key, it is luckily covered in a classroom dedicated to it, namely English class, or ELA (English Language Arts). As a bonus, students learn to debate and discuss complex topics through analysis and critical thinking in another of the wonderful courses found all across America, Social Studies class. C. Mathematics is all about learning rules and logical application of those rules. The most common use of this learning is through numeric expressions, such as factoring polynomials, you are absolutely correct. Other topics learned in 7th-grade include Rational / Proportional thinking, Statistical Analysis, Negative Operations, and a bevy of Geometric learnings such as Angle Relationships, Circle dimensions, as so on. While these are being applied to numeric situations, the reality is learning how algorithms work and what to look for to determine patterns is a key strategy to creating debate strategies, accessing deep information in text, and so on. For instance, I noticed that, through reading between the lines, you find parts of math to be ludicrous to have to learn. Let me tell you, polynomial factorization has been a mainstay of Algebra for well over 1000 years, and so unfortunately this is not a part of new math. To keep things simple for you, as you seem like someone that might need simple explanations to understand things, YOU learned polynomials and factoring them in the 7th grade as well. The difference in education is that I teach 3 or 4 methods to approach this topic, you learned one. Ironically, this means YOU are unable to communicate in a multitude of ways, while my students are able to use them to varying levels of success and understand them. That, unfortunately, means that YOU struggle with the communication on these topics. When I wrote that intercommunication of the topics was reduced, I meant inter-generationally, as another reply noted. The kids get it, you don't. D. Alright, I had my fun. Kindly keep your sassy attitude about schools to yourself, I don't have the time for any more of this to waste on someone who can't reason their way across an open field. I don't feel the need to go further. Reply if you'd like. Maybe the useless internet karma/points/whatever you gain from this can cause you some satisfaction. Have a GREAT day :)
Old Bo is a wild ride. But you should do "Im Bo Yo" if you haven't. But his newer stuff is more refined if you want more production quality. Any song off "What", "Words Words Words", "Make Happy" or "Inside" will be good.
This song and a lot of his songs are just filled with puns, double entendres and triple entendres. It’s hard to catch everything the first time, but the more you listen the more you catch and the more it makes sense.
The irony is that he's not singing about anything beyond high school level, but he just does it creatively, but her "creative"brain has a printing with it 😅
Kennedy and Lincoln had a few common factors: They were both "un-alived_ by men with three names: John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald Kennedy was s___ in a LINCOLN Continental... produced by FORD, while Lincoln was s___ in FORDs theater. Both were elected to congress in '46 Both were elected president in '60 Both have seven letters in their last name Both were s___ on a Friday, both in the head Both successors were named Johnson Both men who s____ them were also "un-alived" before they went to court
@@wordlife94 it’s supposed to be that Kennedy had a secretary named Lincoln and Lincoln had one named Kennedy, but Kennedy never had a secretary named Lincoln
The variable i is used to define imaginary numbers. An example would be a square root of a negative number, because there really shouldn't be a square root of a negative number because you have to multiply a number by itself to square it and that result cannot be negative because the signs would cancel each other out. A simpler example would be when a kid says infinity and their friend says infinity+1. That is an imaginary number, but it's a real principle in math.
With this song he wrote and put it up when he was 17 or 18 and he does say some offensive stuff in it but he has worse songs from around the time he made this. He also references these songs in one of his songs on inside where he acknowledges that he said offensive stuff and has since changed and he has pushed to get the more offensive stuff to be removed if possible and doesn’t promote it
you should check out Tom Lehrer's song "New Math". It's not related to this one in any way but it might make you feel a little bit better when it comes to the new math being taught in schools
Ah. Young Bo. Even back then his alliteration was masterful, and with the edgy humor of your standard teen. Back then, Bo was just funny. Today, incredibly insightful.
Took me a pretty long time to break down every bar. Still don't know what the industrial smog line means though. And this Einsteinian genius wrote this in HIGH SCHOOL.
I'll throw one in, although it's an easier one. C A L, see you later. CALCulator. Also, this isn't the first time Americans have had to deal with new math... or comedians talking about it. New Math - Tom Lehrer. th-cam.com/video/UIKGV2cTgqA/w-d-xo.html Tom Lehrer is an absolutely fascinating individual who was brilliant and funny.
Just a guess. Santa Clause divided by I, could mean Santa is divided by all the people or parents. Everyone is “I” to themself. So I am Santa Clause, and people(I) are real. Maybe that makes sense. Lol
You should be doing FAR more Bo Burnham and Rodney Carrington than ANYTHING else EXCEPT Country music from the 60s thru the early 2000s Everything else just makes me skip your videos. Also, you suck at finding correct videos lol. You inevitably play the least quality hardest to understand versions. There is audio from a live version of this that is so much more polished. It makes all the diffetence.
The things he is saying in the song Intentionally make No sense, just like the new math. It should be obvious to the most casual observer, you are overthinking the song.
![[Industry Ghostwriter] Reacts to: Bo Burnham- I’m Bo Yo- I CANT BELIEVE HE MADE THIS 🤣](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AVuJmPRoUHs/mqdefault.jpg)
Hope this helps:
Domain, domain range?
A kid with too much in his pants.
-- In math, a domain refers to the X-axis whereas the range refers to the Y-axis. X and Y also refer to chromosomes, which are normally XY (male) or XX (female). I think Bo is suggesting that XXY would result in being both male and female, but in reality it would result in a male with Klinefelter syndrome.
What's two balls minus one?
Seven titles at the Tour de France.
-- Lance Armstrong
And Santa Claus multipied by "i",
well, I guess that makes him real.
-- "i" in math stands for imaginary numbers. If you multiply an imaginary number by "i" you get a real number. So if Santa Clause is imaginary and you multiply him by "i"...
What's the opposite of LN(X)?
Duraflame the unnatural log.
-- LN(X) is known as the natural log.
If there's a fat guy in a pastry shop
With a twenty dollar bill and he's ready to buy,
In order to predict his volume change,
You'll need to know the value of pi.
-- Value of pi as in 3.14159... and also the "value of pie" as in the cost of pie in the shop; in order to understand how much his volume will increase, you need to know how many pies he can buy with $20.
There's a metal train a mile long
And at the very back end the lightning bolt struck her,
How long til it reaches and kills the driver,
Provided that he's a good conductor.
-- Pun on train conductor + metal being a good conductor.
If ten percent of men are gay,
Twenty percent of men are Chinese,
What are the odds that a man chosen at random
Spends his free time and meal time while on his knees?
-- Joke based on Chinese eating while kneeling, and also gay men performing certain recreational activities while on their knees.
Havin' sex is like doing fractions,
It's improper for the larger one to be on top.
-- A fraction with the larger number on top is known as an improper fraction.
Squaring numbers are just like women,
If they're under thirteen then just do them in your head.
-- Oh Bo. Just... no.
Lol thank you for this
damn
And the answer to the train problem is approximately the speed of sound through the medium, assuming the train is all bare conductive material, the low resistance path somehow leads straight to the train’s conductor, and death is instant.
The median freight train length in the US, as of 2021 is ~1.8km; the speed of sound through steel is ~5.1km/s, so assuming the above constraints, the answer is ~0.35 seconds, with a polished bare steel train with some weird insulation practices, with a conductor with a faulty heart and an aneurysm that's just angrily waiting for an excuse.
Given the speed of sound through air is ~0.3km/s it would take 5x longer for the conductor to hear that they were about to die, than for them to do so.
Isn't XY male chromosomes? Only males carry the Y, which is why the father is the determining factor in the baby's gender.
Slight mistake on your explanation of the XXY joke it has nothing to do with being both male and female but that chromosomes are genes and jeans are also pants
I love that you reacted to this. It took me so many rewatches and people explaining all the bars before I fully got it. I use the calculator app, ok? It's just such fun wordplay. "What's domain, domain, range? A kid with too much in his pants." XXY, too many chromosomes. (X and Y axis)
"Santa Claus multiplied by i, I guess that makes him real". "i" being an imaginary number so "imaginary" Santa Claus x an imaginary number, that must make it real. Imaginary x imaginary number = real number
"And what’s the opposite of ln(x)? Duraflame, the unnatural log." ln(x) is the natural log in math so Duraflame logs being unnatural would be the opposite. All those three completely went over my head until I saw someone explaining it and it still made me laugh.
"santa claus multiplied by i" In math, i is an imaginary number, and a lot people think Santa Claus is imaginary, so basically it's a "negative times a negative is a positive" kinda statement :)
i represents the square root of -1, which doesn’t actually exist. i stands for imaginary number, and if you divide one by another you can make real numbers, so since Santa is imaginary he would become real. The domain domain range joke is about hermaphroditism and I’ll just leave it there. There’s a lot in this song that ranges from arithmetic to calculus and number theory, don’t feel bad at all for missing some of it.
😂
He doesn't say divide. He says multiply
@@wonderweasle2212 yeah, you’re right, same thing though
You’re so humble, gracious and sweet. Been binging your Bo Burnham reactions and when you address the trolls in the comments asking them to be kind you do it in a way that isn’t complaining but instead thanking them for helping you figure things out. Love that.
Can I just say…RESPECT for reacting to this (and posting your honest reaction) even though you didn’t understand some of it. This was my first Bo song WAAAAAAY back in the early days of the internet, and not enough people react to this one. Loving your Bo reactions, and thanks to this fun, honest reaction (and the one to From God’s Perspective), you got a new sub!
Came across your channel last week. 1) You're awesome. 2) Love your hair. 3) Bo always entertains while making you think. I've seen several of your other reactions to him. Enjoyed them all. Keep doing what your doing and I wish you all the success. Best to your family.
Been loving your reactions for a bit now.
I actually teach 7th-grade math. I think a lot of parents get really frustrated nowadays because what we do in math class is demonstrate multiple algorithms to reach the same conclusions, many of which are demonstrated through shapes or more stretched-out processes to allow for more students to find a method that works best for them.
When we all were in school, often math class focused on a single algorithm and heavy practice. Now, it's a series of different methods that all students are expected to try and practice in smaller amounts so they can self-select a method that best fits their way of thinking. There are pros and cons to both methods.
For instance, the way we all learned means we can all easily communicate the same idea to each other, but many students felt overwhelmed and unable to engage with the learning because the methods did not match how they engaged with number sense.
The new method allows for students that may have not been able to enjoy or engage with the content to better do so but comes at the cost of uniformity across all students which means that there can be translation issues between methods because others may not understand the process chosen to achieve the result.
At the end of the day, the numbers should all work out to the same answer. It's math, nothing has fundamentally changed. It's mostly the approach vector that has been altered in the hopes that more students will be able to reach an understanding of the subject material.
This also is why when I teach negative numbers, I work through number lines and expanded form multiplication to demonstrate how the numbers are being altered. It's the difference between a mechanic giving you advice like "Two negatives always cancel" versus popping the hood and saying, "Here's why two negatives cancel." We still eventually boil the information down to the simple rules, but by taking students through why it works that way, I have fewer students push back on it being true.
So as a teacher of math, I do get what parents are saying. We are very used to there being a single path to follow to get the answer. I promise that the path still exists and is one of many taught. We are just trying to make the subject more approachable to a wider variety of thinkers.
I appreciate you laying it out like this because I have been so confused with my daughter's homework, and she's only in 3rd grade.
I understand the why, but those of us who learned math the old way know one way of doing things, so while this new method will potentially help kids if they go home and the parents are saying "do it this way" then that undoes what was taught in school. I know this isn't your fault, but it's hard to teach my kid how to do something if I only know one way to do it.
This whole thing sounds like it will take a generation to get right, because the teachers like you have to learn how to teach different methods, and the parents have to understand the different methods. This will be frustrating until my kid is a parent and the teachers all grew up with this.
Either way, keep doing what you're doing and hopefully some of these kids find it easier to grasp the concepts.
"but comes at the cost of uniformity across all students which means that there can be translation issues" Well, since proper communication is more important in life than the ability to factor polynomials: I think you and the entire education system are making a huge mistake. Regression to the mean is not progress.
@@TheMadJestyr A. Little aggressive, buddy. Not like I make the decisions on what the curriculum are, I just understand why the decisions were made. Focus that frustration on someone with actual power around that.
B. Luckily, multiple courses are offered at all schools to ensure students have well-rounded and appropriate educations. While communication is key, it is luckily covered in a classroom dedicated to it, namely English class, or ELA (English Language Arts). As a bonus, students learn to debate and discuss complex topics through analysis and critical thinking in another of the wonderful courses found all across America, Social Studies class.
C. Mathematics is all about learning rules and logical application of those rules. The most common use of this learning is through numeric expressions, such as factoring polynomials, you are absolutely correct. Other topics learned in 7th-grade include Rational / Proportional thinking, Statistical Analysis, Negative Operations, and a bevy of Geometric learnings such as Angle Relationships, Circle dimensions, as so on.
While these are being applied to numeric situations, the reality is learning how algorithms work and what to look for to determine patterns is a key strategy to creating debate strategies, accessing deep information in text, and so on. For instance, I noticed that, through reading between the lines, you find parts of math to be ludicrous to have to learn. Let me tell you, polynomial factorization has been a mainstay of Algebra for well over 1000 years, and so unfortunately this is not a part of new math.
To keep things simple for you, as you seem like someone that might need simple explanations to understand things, YOU learned polynomials and factoring them in the 7th grade as well. The difference in education is that I teach 3 or 4 methods to approach this topic, you learned one. Ironically, this means YOU are unable to communicate in a multitude of ways, while my students are able to use them to varying levels of success and understand them. That, unfortunately, means that YOU struggle with the communication on these topics. When I wrote that intercommunication of the topics was reduced, I meant inter-generationally, as another reply noted. The kids get it, you don't.
D. Alright, I had my fun. Kindly keep your sassy attitude about schools to yourself, I don't have the time for any more of this to waste on someone who can't reason their way across an open field. I don't feel the need to go further. Reply if you'd like. Maybe the useless internet karma/points/whatever you gain from this can cause you some satisfaction.
Have a GREAT day :)
Mr. L Boyd reacted to this song so he can probably provide a lot of help with this one Brit.
Old Bo is a wild ride. But you should do "Im Bo Yo" if you haven't.
But his newer stuff is more refined if you want more production quality. Any song off "What", "Words Words Words", "Make Happy" or "Inside" will be good.
"Unalived" got me rolling 😂😂
This song and a lot of his songs are just filled with puns, double entendres and triple entendres. It’s hard to catch everything the first time, but the more you listen the more you catch and the more it makes sense.
I saw this when it was released and I still catch things I missed. A lot of these are levels deep.
I was this many years old when I saw Britt with long hair for the first time!!!
The irony is that he's not singing about anything beyond high school level, but he just does it creatively, but her "creative"brain has a printing with it 😅
Henry phillips would be good too. Tbh for most of the viewers it would also be there first reaction.
wow i love your hair and great reaction
Kennedy and Lincoln had a few common factors:
They were both "un-alived_ by men with three names: John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald
Kennedy was s___ in a LINCOLN Continental... produced by FORD, while Lincoln was s___ in FORDs theater.
Both were elected to congress in '46
Both were elected president in '60
Both have seven letters in their last name
Both were s___ on a Friday, both in the head
Both successors were named Johnson
Both men who s____ them were also "un-alived" before they went to court
and I think Kennedy had an advisor named Lincoln and Lincoln had a advisor named Kennedy, something like that
@@wordlife94 it’s supposed to be that Kennedy had a secretary named Lincoln and Lincoln had one named Kennedy, but Kennedy never had a secretary named Lincoln
The variable i is used to define imaginary numbers. An example would be a square root of a negative number, because there really shouldn't be a square root of a negative number because you have to multiply a number by itself to square it and that result cannot be negative because the signs would cancel each other out. A simpler example would be when a kid says infinity and their friend says infinity+1. That is an imaginary number, but it's a real principle in math.
And as for Burnham...you look like Sonequa Martin-Green who play Michael Burnham in Star Trek Discovery! :)
Oh yeah, my boys had "new math" 30 years ago (which I'm sure has gotten newer😮). My husband helped them with it. I wanted to cry or tear my hair out!
Beyond the obvious, Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy. Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln.
One of my favorited from Bo
New math is from the 60s. "New math, tom lehehr"
With this song he wrote and put it up when he was 17 or 18 and he does say some offensive stuff in it but he has worse songs from around the time he made this. He also references these songs in one of his songs on inside where he acknowledges that he said offensive stuff and has since changed and he has pushed to get the more offensive stuff to be removed if possible and doesn’t promote it
Words Words Words and Oh Bo. I promise there's little to no math in either
you should check out Tom Lehrer's song "New Math". It's not related to this one in any way but it might make you feel a little bit better when it comes to the new math being taught in schools
Definitely. Tom Lehrer is a forgotten gem.
Ah. Young Bo. Even back then his alliteration was masterful, and with the edgy humor of your standard teen.
Back then, Bo was just funny. Today, incredibly insightful.
It's just wordplay with math concepts (some of which are complex haha).
The actual 'new math' came out during civil rights. Look up tom Lehehrs new math.
It's not supposed to be confusing. It just all went over your head somehow
Took me a pretty long time to break down every bar. Still don't know what the industrial smog line means though. And this Einsteinian genius wrote this in HIGH SCHOOL.
The one thing I hate in math is IMAGINARY NUMBERS!! lol I know there is a reason for them but so dumb haaha
I have a strange feeling that you would like Demetri Martin. He was Bo before there was a Bo. And it's a bit cleaner than Bo. Just a thought.
New math cameout in the 60s
Haven't even watched this and I can't wait to see it all go over your head...even 16 year old bo was too clever for you!
Do the Hellen Keller one
Well the potato chip bit is about the exploited Nike workers in China.
New math was before you were born
❤
You should watch MrLBoyd’s reaction to it if you’re confused. He explains a lot of the math bars
PLEASE do more early bo!! i recommend "Bo for Sho" next! thanks alot!
He is the greatest rapper ever... :)
He's just taking real math concepts (like i) and using them comedically.
I'll throw one in, although it's an easier one. C A L, see you later. CALCulator.
Also, this isn't the first time Americans have had to deal with new math... or comedians talking about it.
New Math - Tom Lehrer. th-cam.com/video/UIKGV2cTgqA/w-d-xo.html Tom Lehrer is an absolutely fascinating individual who was brilliant and funny.
Just a guess. Santa Clause divided by I, could mean Santa is divided by all the people or parents. Everyone is “I” to themself. So I am Santa Clause, and people(I) are real. Maybe that makes sense. Lol
0.27% of Jenga games are played on 9/11...
Wtf is new math?
Have American politicised mathematics?
You should be doing FAR more Bo Burnham and Rodney Carrington than ANYTHING else EXCEPT Country music from the 60s thru the early 2000s
Everything else just makes me skip your videos.
Also, you suck at finding correct videos lol. You inevitably play the least quality hardest to understand versions. There is audio from a live version of this that is so much more polished. It makes all the diffetence.
The things he is saying in the song Intentionally make No sense, just like the new math. It should be obvious to the most casual observer, you are overthinking the song.