Matt Dillahuntys (end of kalam) debunked with ease

[@Waxican]

I was able to grasp most of what you are saying and you seem like a very intelligent young man, but please slow down a little or put captions along with your speech. Otherwise good video.

[@bobmiller5009]

@@Waxican thank you so much

[@bobmiller5009]

@@Waxican appreciate the advice!

[@HaloDoga]

Do a takedown of Matt’s “argument from contingency” video.

[@ethanbenson]

Cool video!

[@SharedPhilosophy]

Bro this is a real philosophy channel!
I really need to up my philosophy game cuz i understood like 2 percent of what was being said.
Great video and channel my dude ❤

[@bobmiller5009]

Thank you and don’t feel bad about not understanding most of what I said is predicated on background information

[@HarnDenis-xq1op]

"Without lies atheism dies" - Einstein

[@steve95188]

He never said that.

[@hasone1848]

"Without lies Christianity dies" - Jesus

[@asyetundetermined]

“NERRRRRRDDDD!!”
-Homer J Simpson

[@bobmiller5009]

@@asyetundetermined 😂😂😂

[@_Mo-Ham_]

You need to talk faster.

[@bobmiller5009]

Will do

[@DefendingJehovahsWitnesses]

Please do not call him a bad word. I would advise you to not use insults. They may turn people away that would otherwise watch the video. That does not mean one can not make any jokes. One can. For example, you made his beard longer and showed another atheist as a kangaroo and Pruss as another non-human. But, obviously, this naming after an animal is an insult.
But I agree, obviously, the universe is not eternal and was caused by God, specifically indentified as Jehovah God by Biblical revelation.

[@bobmiller5009]

I’m a bit torn as to whether or not to include insults I’m leaning more insults for a few reasons 1) my Goal is be honest after that it’s nice to convince people and be nice but if I think somebody is an ape “they are intellectually clumsy and come across as an overconfident fool” and additionally they deserve to be made fun of “for being a terrible person independently” I prefer to say so as this is my honest review.
2) some people like Matt treat people like Craig so poorly where Matt won’t engage with his actual ideas no amount of patient humble philosophical correction will change this “pruss, Josh etc are left untouched by Matt” the language Matt speaks is tribalistic philosophy that’s what he cares about that’s what he’ll engage with.
3) many online atheists are absolute bullies especially to those less philosophically capable than themselves nobody seems to be standing up to them with the same energy I think it’s about time someone does.
4) some professional theist philosophers like Josh are to nice and or professional to call stupidity when they see it I think this can mislead some into giving far more credence than necessary to fringe/ridiculous philosophical positions I’m also sick of this. I can go on and on I appreciate the worry but I think I’m going to stick to the rule of replicating an equal attitude to the person too whom I’m talking and in Matt’s case he deserves what he got

[@hiderchrishop]

Have you tried to write it down and sending him a written version? You talk very fast and to be honest its really annoying to listen to like this. Maybe next time put up some captions or atleast some guiding text. Like this your minecraft gameplay is more distracting.

[@bobmiller5009]

I actually just interacted with him, and he’s a dishonest liar. He doesn’t care about philosophy or the truth, and he won’t adjust his position. As for me talking fast, needing captions, guiding text, and distracting gameplay, duly noted. Thanks for the constructive criticism.

[@hiderchrishop]

@@bobmiller5009 Hope it helps! I dont agree with you but i also dont fully understand what you are saying. Sadly I do have trouble following someone talking for this long and fast. But sounds interesting

[@HarnDenis-xq1op]

Nice video

[@person7122]

The obvious disparity in intelligence 😂😂😂

[@bobmiller5009]

On an Aristotelian essentialist account of modality this is so on account of Matt’s essential indignant ape essence that his existence is identical to!

[@HarnDenis-xq1op]

Ape and mankind.

[@goldenalt3166]

Since you've defined "begins to exist" to include rearrangement of existing material. It seems trivial that things can cause themselves. Simple gravitational collapse allows a cloud of material to become a sphere, for example.

[@bobmiller5009]

@@goldenalt3166 so in that case would be gravitational collapse not self causation.

[@goldenalt3166]

@@bobmiller5009 Gravity is caused by the material itself.

[@bobmiller5009]

@@goldenalt3166 and this bec of some law

[@goldenalt3166]

@@bobmiller5009 That's quite a stretch. Do you think that a physical form that begins to exist cannot be part of something that created it?

[@bobmiller5009]

@@goldenalt3166 it can but it’s merely Similar to its cause not identical to it

[@tankiprogoldbox9981]

We just don't know if the universe began to exist or expanded from a small dot.

[@HarnDenis-xq1op]

Ok sure a dot 😂

[@bobmiller5009]

P2) of Kalam support = 1) successive edition argument. 2) Hilbert hotel argument. Your challenge to them is?

[@_Mo-Ham_]

@@bobmiller5009
What makes you think you know more about cosmology than cosmologists ?
All you're doing is using locally observed phenomina beyond their validated scope of applicability.

[@donaldmartinez1764]

@@bobmiller5009 there is no problem with an infinite regress.. even con man William admits it already.. that’s why all the models in cosmology are infinite regress models.. if you have an infinite people leaving the motel after let’s say 3 and an infinite number of people checking in then you will have 3.. you can just posit an unknown natural force instead of god of the gapsing it.. look up malpas kalam.. him and a bunch of philosophers and cosmologists shred the kalam…

[@ZalmyVishedsky]

This is phenomenal, keep up the good work!

[@bobmiller5009]

Thank you

[@_Mo-Ham_]

@@bobmiller5009
I'd call it specious drivel but still, each to their own.

[@bobmiller5009]

@@_Mo-Ham_ hi idiot! would you like to offer something of philosophical significance?

[@_Mo-Ham_]

@@bobmiller5009
"hi idiot! would you like to offer something of philosophical significance?"
- The irony.
I already did in another post.

[@DeezoNits]

High level philosophy

[@bobmiller5009]

This seems like an ambiguous assertion can you tell me what distinguishes this from say low level or higher level philosophy

[@tomthumb3994]

i think i remember your voice....u been embarassed on the show a bunch havent you?

[@bobmiller5009]

@@tomthumb3994 never been on the show

[@tomthumb3994]

@@bobmiller5009 "the show"?

[@tomthumb3994]

@@bobmiller5009 great so im sure ill hear you this week!! awesome!

[@bobmiller5009]

@@tomthumb3994 I’ll call in sometime but I’m busy this weekend

[@tomthumb3994]

@@bobmiller5009 ofcourse u r