Hi man! I was uuuooohhh (red player). I also have an 4chess channel in spanish. I like the way that you think when u play. Good strategies. It was an interesting game. I hope i see u again!
At 36:48 bishop to i13 would have been better since it would attack both of blue rooks, pins one of it to blue's queen and if blue were to capture on j14 then capturing back with the queen would put a lot of pressure on blue's rook giving red a chance to mount an attack on him
@@4playerchess896 not so sure you would have lost in that particular endgame. Red would start focusing on blue and you could have started pushing that pawn which was 2 moves away from queening. Not saying it would be easy but after a few trades between blue and red... you never know
At 22:00 I would not have attacked because after red attacked your queen blue had a discovered attack on your 9 point queen after moving the pawn in the way of his bishop
At 3:40 I think that bishop move was probably not the best. If green had moved his knight to k4 opening a protected discovery on your queen and blue also attacked your queen with his knight you would have had to move your queen and lose the rook.
Yes, was a little risky. However, if green would actually move knight to k4 red might take it with his night and I might take the green bishop with my queen if I trust red to team with me...
@@4playerchess896 yeah I agree. But I don't usually prefer putting my queen's fate in the hands of opposites. If they are unwilling to co-operate or if they make a mistake it would be a problem.
![Italian Game Chess Opening Explained in 20 Minutes [Crash Course]](/img/n.gif)
Hi man! I was uuuooohhh (red player). I also have an 4chess channel in spanish. I like the way that you think when u play. Good strategies. It was an interesting game. I hope i see u again!
Great to hear from you. I klicked your channel. Looks good, but unfortunately I do not speak any spanish.
At 36:48 bishop to i13 would have been better since it would attack both of blue rooks, pins one of it to blue's queen and if blue were to capture on j14 then capturing back with the queen would put a lot of pressure on blue's rook giving red a chance to mount an attack on him
Hm, I am not so sure about this. I would be afraid to exchange my rook with blue and then loose against red in the endgame.
@@4playerchess896 not so sure you would have lost in that particular endgame. Red would start focusing on blue and you could have started pushing that pawn which was 2 moves away from queening. Not saying it would be easy but after a few trades between blue and red... you never know
At 22:00 I would not have attacked because after red attacked your queen blue had a discovered attack on your 9 point queen after moving the pawn in the way of his bishop
Yes, you are right.
At 3:40 I think that bishop move was probably not the best. If green had moved his knight to k4 opening a protected discovery on your queen and blue also attacked your queen with his knight you would have had to move your queen and lose the rook.
Yes, was a little risky. However, if green would actually move knight to k4 red might take it with his night and I might take the green bishop with my queen if I trust red to team with me...
@@4playerchess896 yeah I agree. But I don't usually prefer putting my queen's fate in the hands of opposites. If they are unwilling to co-operate or if they make a mistake it would be a problem.