The Review of Uldum: Hearthstone Quick Take

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 245

  • @HearthstoneMathematics
    @HearthstoneMathematics 5 ปีที่แล้ว +387

    Welcome back,
    The Penniless Player! :]

  • @Kyuzo897
    @Kyuzo897 5 ปีที่แล้ว +327

    This feels like the first video in years.

    • @Baconator4579
      @Baconator4579 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Isaí Colín lol tell me about it

  • @Baconator4579
    @Baconator4579 5 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    7:50 yes I agree brawl was garbage compared to void contract

    • @Sinter_klaas
      @Sinter_klaas 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I would play void contract if it cost 4. Probably.

  • @JonathanMakhi
    @JonathanMakhi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Hit it on the nose penniless as a fellow f2p player myself, I can't help but agree. I think another problem is that every class (except warrior) has basically only one viable deck. This makes it even harder for f2p players succeed cause now they have to craft many, many class legendaries and epics. used to be able to craft about 3 full decks an expac but in uldum, i could only afford 2 while keeping my collection relatively healthy.

    • @FranzNF
      @FranzNF 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The guys at Heartstone Mathematics have made some good videos explaining how the cost of the game in general has been increasing through the years. The people that buys pack have to buy even more nowadays to get a good collection and they are pushing f2p player out of the ecuation. I guess raking more money than what they need is worth the bleeding of the playerbase and losing the apreciation of the fanbase.

    • @felipealvarado8801
      @felipealvarado8801 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well I am another f2p and I dont have that problem I have the murloc paladín (he only need 6 epics(murloc warleader, the prisma and the 8 spell that summon 7 murloc) , 8 if you want to add the amalgam that is not nesesary) and the legendaries are in most cases useless, in the totally of the games I played the only legendary that I play is zepherys and the others like chef nomi and leeroy I ever played, specially nomi and zepherys is sometimes that I play him. This deck only need the epics not the legendaries, ah and I have brann and zepherys because in my aperture of packs I got that two and I have the dust to craft hightlander hunter, but is more funny to play in wild

  • @afonsotopa9164
    @afonsotopa9164 5 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Yes!! You're back!!!!
    Finally!!!

  • @cassianomacsil
    @cassianomacsil 5 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    I felt this expansion like: OH NICE I GOT A LEGENDARY! Let'me see in which decks can I use it! Oh I just need 6 or more legendaries and some epics too... Ok so... I'll end this season at 10 T-T

    • @remyllebeau77
      @remyllebeau77 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Try opening 10 legendaries and only getting two that you wanted. Even after playing awhile, I still only like about half of them.

    • @Jonius
      @Jonius 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The hard truth is that we don't get to choose the legendaries we open. So if you happen to open most legendaries not from the half that you wanted, it's a #feelsbad moment.

    • @wizardsmix7961
      @wizardsmix7961 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or you could stop bitching and just dust stuff. Ive been f2p for 5 years and have never been in a situation where I didnt have cards to dust for a new deck

    • @kds6992
      @kds6992 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thats why you play wild, overal cheaper(escpially once got staples) and if dont have specefic are lot more options for evrything and multiple good decks that cost less then a legendary(like mech hunter which only required legendary is teh free snipsnap)
      and cards dont rotate youl always have acces to them, to play competive its lot cheaper in long for wild, and you need lot less per expansion to be competive(if you just want evry card possible ever ofc its gonna be more expensive then to get all standard cards atleast in short amount of time) but for competive its lot cheaper.

    • @eligibbons2155
      @eligibbons2155 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In my second uldum pack I opened Tekahn and I was really happy because I specifically wanted to play zoo. Then I found out zoo was bad and doesn't even run Tekahn... since then I've opened Anka, Colossus of the moon and Tinkmaster overspark :/

  • @jankocioek7516
    @jankocioek7516 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    It's a power creep almost as large as Old gods.

    • @EsauSantamariaM
      @EsauSantamariaM 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Don't you dare compare the best expansion in HS to this shit

  • @raikaria3090
    @raikaria3090 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    'Any type of Warlock deck'
    You're implying there were any to survive in the first place.

  • @desanta3739
    @desanta3739 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It's all right guys, penniless player is just finished a match against control warrior, that's why he hasn't upload for a while

  • @Olivia_Spring
    @Olivia_Spring 5 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    This is why I put down my wallet and only watch hs vids anymore, also blizard lost toast gg

    • @huyquang2197
      @huyquang2197 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      He's chasing the money LOL nothing wrong with Blizz

    • @FranzNF
      @FranzNF 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@huyquang2197 Oh yeah nothing wrong with ActiBlizzard doing their fanbase wrong left and right, nope, nothing to see here.

    • @deejayf69
      @deejayf69 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why did he quit?

    • @Olivia_Spring
      @Olivia_Spring 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@deejayf69 he said HS was getting rather boring and he didn't like the blizzard mentality, after finding TfT he never did a HS video again

    • @deejayf69
      @deejayf69 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Olivia_Spring wow okay. What do you mean by Blizzard mentality?

  • @do-nothingbear9474
    @do-nothingbear9474 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I think another reason battlecry shaman is popular right now is that it has a relatively low cost.

    • @gnammyhamster9554
      @gnammyhamster9554 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also evrybody has Shudderwock because it used to be OP a while ago

  • @bogitokr5933
    @bogitokr5933 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    YESSS Penniless uploaded! Please keep on making this great content!

  • @_knighted
    @_knighted 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wait, he's right. We all have a Shudderwock.

  • @Jonius
    @Jonius 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I figure the defined "optimal" decks became more expensive, I never was one to opt for a full decklist of anything as saying that the decks "required" those legendaries. I played Highlander Mage without owning a Yogg-box, Kalecgos, Siamat or Vulpera at the time. Had Ysera, Messenger Raven, Toki and put a Flakmage in. Then I reached Legend utilising my own Zoolock that doesn't have Soularium and Tekahn, and remember the hype around "needing" Rafaam for Zoolock in RoS? Disappointed that Zoolock has been put down so hard in this video even though it got plenty of powerful tools in Uldum with the EVIL Recruiter, Neferset Thrasher and Diseased Vulture. I used Quicksand Elemental, which I saw 0 people playing.
    They definitely did reduce the trashiness of the worst epics and legendaries, meaning so many become useful, I can agree with that. Bloodsworn Mercenary being a key piece for Aggro Warrior, and Psychopomp for Priest, as well as the Tortollan Pilgrim for Mage, lots of good epics. Octosari and Colossus of the Moon both have their niche uses, which cannot be said for cards like Duskfallen Aviana or Harbinger Celestia.

  • @sapper12b71
    @sapper12b71 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am SO GLAD to you posting again. Thank you for the return I had just about quit using TH-cam for hearthstone related content.

  • @sapper12b71
    @sapper12b71 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am just so happy to see you posting again, thanks for coming back man.

  • @brighty-go6nn
    @brighty-go6nn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "Our *Fanbase* is as *Toxic* As Battery Acid"
    Uniquenameosaurus: *sighs in a Corner*

  • @VidioZaPpEr
    @VidioZaPpEr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Blizzard: What do you want?
    Penniless: It's not that simple.
    Bliz: WHAT DO YOU WANT?!
    Penni: IT'S NOT THAT SIMPLE.

  • @sumcate8168
    @sumcate8168 5 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    "and that's why capitalism is ruining hearthstone"

  • @guillermostaudt6452
    @guillermostaudt6452 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    EEEEEEEEH YOU DONT KNOW HOW MUCH I WAS EXPECTATING THIS

  • @Redhotquagmire
    @Redhotquagmire 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I actually whole-heartedly agree with just about EVERYTHING in this video.
    Thank you for your outspoken wisdom, brother

  • @phoenixjones2569
    @phoenixjones2569 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    ... *continues playing my death rattle warlock in the corner*

  • @YouremadbigL
    @YouremadbigL 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Felt like the last card review left you shook. Good to see you back

  • @laszlokaszas1003
    @laszlokaszas1003 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is the experience what I felt when I started playing.
    It was araund Gadgetzan and it felt like Blizzard said:"Hello we make this very good decks that need a lot of pieces. If you don't like them or can't get them you will SUCK."

  • @dend1
    @dend1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Penniless I listened intently throughout your elaborate explanation and I agree, buff Hunter. Welcome back buddy

  • @hiabuddyoldpal
    @hiabuddyoldpal 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I thought it was just me feeling like something was up, glad to see that I ain't the only one and it's explained in a very good way!

  • @nstruja
    @nstruja 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    For everyone’s own benefit, just pause this video at 0:32 and go put on BOOM BOOM BOOM. I just put it on and listened twice, still amazing. Hey Penny, I want you in my room.

  • @ebigunso
    @ebigunso 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good to see you alive. And you seem to live up to your name pretty well.

  • @coledavies9654
    @coledavies9654 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Its good to see your not dead penniless

  • @Omgacow1000
    @Omgacow1000 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I remember first noticing the "epic problem" in Hearthstone when The Grand Tournament released and they made Twilight Guardian, an incredibly simple and overpowered card that would be auto include in any dragon deck, an epic. Over time they have just done it more and more

  • @cesarsotillo784
    @cesarsotillo784 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    long time no see, my friend. Great to have you back.

  • @maxtiemann9903
    @maxtiemann9903 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glad to see you back, penniless! I'd love to do some friendlies with you sometime, now that I have completed my classic collection. As for the meta analysis, I appreciate how honestly you've summerized it. I can agree with many of the statements you make here, good job.

  • @nothankyou4859
    @nothankyou4859 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Do you think the inner fire combo is next on the chopping block, now that combo priest is very strong?

    • @MasterofMistakes
      @MasterofMistakes 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I hope so, whenever I see a priest all my focus goes into dealing with "Inner Fire", its at the point I don't see priest as priest its just the "Inner Fire" class to me and its kind of sad to see all these options and being like:
      "Is this better then Inner Fire?"
      Answer:
      "No".

    • @nileboy5055
      @nileboy5055 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MasterofMistakes if priest didn't have inner fire it would be at the bottom with warlock again

    • @Sinter_klaas
      @Sinter_klaas 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Honestly, they should remove Inner Fire. But Priest needs help as it is with its base set. There's like two good cards.

    • @nileboy5055
      @nileboy5055 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Sinter_klaas combo priest has always been a thing it's just never been so reliable so quickly amet and pomp definitely should be nerfed instead

    • @Sinter_klaas
      @Sinter_klaas 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nileboy5055 Yeah it has always been a thing. But Priest just constantly falls back on it. It's not interesting and it's very limiting. I'd rather they replaced Inner Fire with something like Kabal Talonpriest, Sandhoof Waterbearer, or maybe even Penance. Base set Priest is desperate for some good cards. It has Northshire Cleric and Power Word:Shield. Admittedly these are two of the strongest cards in the game, but it's not enough. Inner Fire and Divine Spirit are only powerful together.

  • @TheStyler2710
    @TheStyler2710 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Reddit was worrying about you man. Glad you're alive and healthy

  • @rosco762
    @rosco762 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glad to see you back!

  • @somerandomdude3476
    @somerandomdude3476 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You'r right! Support this man, he deserves it

  • @Andrewlik
    @Andrewlik 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good to see ya back Penniless!

  • @TzarNicco
    @TzarNicco 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    He’s back! We missed ya!

  • @Blackdare
    @Blackdare 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's strange
    As a player, it's good to open an epic or legendary and know it will be played
    But
    It's also good to know if you want to build a deck, you only need 2-3 epics/legendaries

  • @srtnnrnn7405
    @srtnnrnn7405 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Welcome back friend

  • @rdsim8589
    @rdsim8589 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good forever. Welcome back

  • @lolmonkyboi
    @lolmonkyboi 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Was waiting for years omg!!!

  • @yotamshitrit6820
    @yotamshitrit6820 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The game pretty much shifted from "There are 3 decks to play" to "there are 8 decks to play but you can afford 2 of them"

  • @cinansnickem228
    @cinansnickem228 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Standart players: Mage is completely useless!
    Wild players: Mage is fucking broken!

  • @Xanthopathy
    @Xanthopathy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    HE POSTED YES I LOVE YOU SO MUCH PENNILESS

  • @nilzero5686
    @nilzero5686 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've thought this for a while but I think it's insulting that a pack only contains five cards. Maybe when it first came out that made sense but assembling decks across multiple expansion card pools is way too unforgiving. The game in general really needs to be more generous with resources to encourage people to keep playing.

  • @dandimit5104
    @dandimit5104 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We were missing you :-)

  • @AwesumBear
    @AwesumBear 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As someone who is also FTP and only plays mage, it's sad to see the top decks nerfed so quickly after years without any decent decks.
    At least Casino Mage will always have a place in my heart. All hail Yogg!

    • @melgibsonero
      @melgibsonero 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mage has the most fun deck in the game if you don't mind losing a lot. Quest mage

  • @lucashurpia7474
    @lucashurpia7474 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you are alive!

  • @darkstone69jdr
    @darkstone69jdr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    great vid and so true im dusting so much to keep up wth the dam kardashians my collection so much smaller now.

  • @djentile7773
    @djentile7773 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was wondering if you were still playing! Good to see you mate

  • @flimpeenflarmpoon1353
    @flimpeenflarmpoon1353 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Enrage Warrior deserves a mention.

  • @djrekin7312
    @djrekin7312 5 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I'm sorry but Corrupt the Waters is not bad prove me wrong

    • @MrSS4A
      @MrSS4A 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's not bad, but if you're playing to win it has no reason to be so popular.

    • @Sinter_klaas
      @Sinter_klaas 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's hard to play properly, but a good player can go far with it. There's a reason it's not good on ladder but GMs bring it to tournaments.

    • @rookiecookie8258
      @rookiecookie8258 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Reached top 500 Legend on EU using only Quest Shaman so yeah the deck is pretty good if played properly.The mistake most people do when playing the deck is that they use the Double Battlecry Hero power the whole time.

    • @TheNaminagul
      @TheNaminagul 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is not too powerful, but so much fun to play and thats the important part of hearthstone

    • @moocats
      @moocats 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Us Shaman players have been PUT DOWN over and over again, when we see a semi-viable deck we play it!

  • @spikkle2627
    @spikkle2627 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Blizzard's greed is why I only ever play HS now against friends, where we can dick around with our bizarro decks and don't have to give a crap about the meta. It's comfy af and honestly the thought of queueing up into ladder makes me feel ill by comparison.

    • @creepykoala7255
      @creepykoala7255 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Looks like I gotta make some friends

  • @bedoza787
    @bedoza787 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yeeees! Finally you are Back!! I missed your vids!

  • @schreipfelerer1782
    @schreipfelerer1782 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    HE IS BACK !!!! keep on the good work!

  • @nohbody987
    @nohbody987 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yay! New video!

  • @williamsmith6364
    @williamsmith6364 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm penniless as well but i run highlander hunter, battlecry shaman, tempo rogue and Murloc Paladin. Because everything is balanced and fine. Just because you don't have a sufficient amount of legendaries doesn't mean you can complain. If you go for a set amount of decks each expansion, you can never go wrong.

  • @velk2897
    @velk2897 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude the cost of solo adventures are fine, the content is where it's at

  • @Dangerousbros1
    @Dangerousbros1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    HE'S BACK PagChomp

  • @causedirt1787
    @causedirt1787 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    OMG YOU'RE BACK!!

  • @RavingRaven887
    @RavingRaven887 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is quest Plot twist warlock good now?

  • @RatchetSly
    @RatchetSly 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've just started the video, so I dunno what points will be brought up yet, but I really enjoy almost everything about this post-nerf meta. I say almost, because a very fast Divine Spirit Inner Fire Priest exists, and that's a deck archetype I've hated since Hearthstone's inception. I greatly enjoy playing my various builds of Quest Shaman, Quest Paladin and a few silly homebrews, and while I don't like to play the other big decks in the meta, all of them I find fun to play against, which is a nice thing. Pushing Highlander decks into repeated "have this answer right now or you're boned" situations, overwhelming Control Warriors with incremental advantages, picking apart Murloc boards, it's all good stuff.
    I've now gotten to the end of the video, and I have to say that I do see the point of complaining about prices. It hasn't affected me at all personally, but that's because I've zero interest in playing Wild, ever, and simply strip-mine old sets for Dust as soon as they rotate - the only cards I have in my Wild collection are ones I can't disenchant, like Marin the Fox, and my one golden Azure Drake, who will remain there forever for dumb sentimental reasons, as it was a linchpin of so many of my decks before it got kicked out (card draw, spell power and dragon tribe hits so many of the archetypes I've enjoyed). As a result, I'm sitting on a dragon's hoard of something like 650,000 Dust.

  • @black369ace7
    @black369ace7 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You’ve been away for so long, I forgot that you existed. 😬 need to see more of you tbh.

  • @dragonslair951167
    @dragonslair951167 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think a big issue with this meta is that it's extremely polarized. There's a good number of auto-concede matchups out there. Like Quest Paladin vs. Control Warrior: Quest Paladin has an 80% winrate in that matchup! It's ridiculous.
    I think another big reason why Battlecry Shaman is so popular is because it's not very polarized; unlike, say, Control Warrior, Quest Shaman doesn't have any auto-concede matchups that you simply cannot win. So it's an ideal deck to climb with, since there's less risk of repeatedly running into bad matchups on the ladder.

  • @felipelandi1766
    @felipelandi1766 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    the legend was right, he's back

  • @lukekidsos3424
    @lukekidsos3424 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also may we please get an explanation on rouge?

  • @Jussumgai
    @Jussumgai 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's why you play Wild where your deck will be relevant for years with a few new cards.

  • @ForgottenBridge
    @ForgottenBridge 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    They managed to balance a meta so well it hurts f2p...well done and I thought I was going crazy with my collection and deck building. Glad to be reassured of this problem and hopefully we get some changes once the next set comes around.

  • @furgel7717
    @furgel7717 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is a fun and diverse meta, unless you're a warlock or rogue main, coincidentally, the 2 heroes I'm closest to having golden. :(

    • @gnammyhamster9554
      @gnammyhamster9554 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I main Warlock and I almost only play wild now

  • @sumcate8168
    @sumcate8168 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    YOU'RE BACK!!!!! :DDDDD

  • @jeppekjr349
    @jeppekjr349 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bet that the 3rd expansion is gonna be cataclysm based

  • @seeinred
    @seeinred 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    > Healthy meta
    _laughs in 90k armor druid_

    • @remyllebeau77
      @remyllebeau77 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Isn't that only in wild?

    • @kds6992
      @kds6992 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      its only in wild, and its a meme deck(like tier 4 or something) and can be ealsy killed before gets to that and then geist destroys the combo.

  • @michielhoeree7604
    @michielhoeree7604 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where do you get your stats?

  • @oskartu12
    @oskartu12 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please don't leave us again: (

  • @TzarNicco
    @TzarNicco 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quest shaman is still kicking ass....

  • @James-sn4wd
    @James-sn4wd 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:30 anyone noticed dr boom from GvG

  • @ThePintor360
    @ThePintor360 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeeeeeesssssssssssssssssss you're back!!! Thank God I thought you left for sure!

  • @nonagon7385
    @nonagon7385 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Honorable mention goes to Combo Priest for being a decently prominent aggro player in the meta. Popularity wise, I'd say that's the aggro deck to beat, not Murloc Paladin.

  • @c0nstisayshi501
    @c0nstisayshi501 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like this expansion

  • @baruhriss118
    @baruhriss118 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    your alive

  • @bluskies3554
    @bluskies3554 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    We miss you

  • @TheForhekset
    @TheForhekset 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quest shaman doesnt suck it's all over ladder, on my way to legend that's mostly what I played against, except for the combo preist every now and again.

  • @gabriel_cooper
    @gabriel_cooper 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    welcome back dude! Really missed your content ^^

  • @ramysami
    @ramysami 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Welcome back

  • @blandersummer
    @blandersummer 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Welp he back

  • @felipeluz5035
    @felipeluz5035 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I completely agree. The only problem with this meta is how expensive it is!
    I even started to play Mech Hunter on Wild to grind to Rank 5... xD

  • @spaceclaw1958
    @spaceclaw1958 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is why WhizBang is the only deck I run still, crafted in normal and golden depending on my mood. It's basically the equivalent of Making the game free to play, but It's now $15 a month to Build your own Deck Unless it's face-hunter and if you don't subscribe you get a random shit deck that craps on you for resisting Pavlovian training.

  • @peteypariah6603
    @peteypariah6603 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Opened a Colossus of the Moon from my 50 packs and ended up playing big decks the whole expansion. No regrets.

    • @remyllebeau77
      @remyllebeau77 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Huh. That is one of the ones I am thinking about dusting the most.

  • @ScarletSpartan_
    @ScarletSpartan_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Warrior is almost ENTIRELY made to just kill your stuff, which is why it can control the game so easily. It’s no wonder that players hated it so much if it was control.

  • @whatisthat959
    @whatisthat959 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I need to get 4 more legendary for my of meta quest warlock that hare going to ratate out next expantion, hare you kidning me blizard?

  • @TheWoodcookie
    @TheWoodcookie 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I never thought the DR,boom nerf would do anything but mage didnt deserve two nerfs

  • @BartixShieldsmen
    @BartixShieldsmen 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    And that is why I try to make the 2 cards I got for free elice and untapped potential work in a deck. I'll find other legendaries eventually

  • @byVariations
    @byVariations 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Quest Shaman is popular because it's extremely cheap and very easy to make and play. it ain't that hard to see

  • @MagitekBahamuto
    @MagitekBahamuto 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The penniless player: _"Later sets are the ones that have the most likely to have stronger cards, increasing the value of purchasing them"._
    *Proceeds to buy tons of Rastakhan packs*
    The Peniless Player: _"nvm it's worse than Un'Goro in terms of powercreep, LOL"._

  • @kalelalagao6154
    @kalelalagao6154 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    He’s back people

  • @blueberryandbribery1722
    @blueberryandbribery1722 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    2:17, no, Murloc paladin isn't awesome, it's the worst deck in the meta, it decided by weather or not you play prismatic lens on turn 4 and requires no skill to play.

    • @hauke5036
      @hauke5036 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No it's easy to clear even on turn 4, speaking as a Quest Hunter though. :D

    • @leobastian_
      @leobastian_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      but it's just murlocs. its a nice board,but either brawl or hellfire make the card useless. the tempo swing is only good because it has 2 of those+nomi,which means the around ~3 aoes control decks have are barely enough to defeat the swings,not the normal played minions.

    • @juliacabubatz
      @juliacabubatz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@leobastian_ Implying you can stay alive as a warlock agains't aggro in this meta.
      Yeah no.

    • @leobastian_
      @leobastian_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@juliacabubatz you can. its not a top tier deck,but it's fun and it has a around 50 percent winrate.

    • @juliacabubatz
      @juliacabubatz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@leobastian_ You can mostly as a Zoolock perhaps, I've been playing Plot Twist Warlock with the Quest kind of a lot during the expansion, usually agains't murloc decks it's a miracly if you can stay alive on turn 7.

  • @tijmen-bk6rc
    @tijmen-bk6rc 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!

  • @isaac4404
    @isaac4404 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, he's not dead. I was starting to wonder...

  • @prestonm-f382
    @prestonm-f382 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    ... Comrade Penniless