Love the data on this. Numbers wise, they are pretty much the same. How did the dispersion feel? It looks like the VC + was slightly better in that regard. With them being so similar, is there much of a selling point to get the + instead of the 2019 model?
Probably not unfortunately. Generally speaking the lower the torque the easier it will be to close the face to the path but the downside is that low torque shafts a often heavy as well.
It is great to see the scientific approach to club dynamics rather then the feel approach that most golf TH-camrs do. Keep up these great videos.
Very interesting analysis. Thanks!
Love the data on this.
Numbers wise, they are pretty much the same. How did the dispersion feel? It looks like the VC + was slightly better in that regard.
With them being so similar, is there much of a selling point to get the + instead of the 2019 model?
Very close, maybe slightly tighter with the VC+ but really similar.
I like to play a draw would one be easier then then the other to draw it.
Probably not unfortunately. Generally speaking the lower the torque the easier it will be to close the face to the path but the downside is that low torque shafts a often heavy as well.
Any thoughts on how the Ventus Blue 2024 compares to the Ping Tour Chrome 2.0?
2 very different shafts. The Alta tour from Ping is counterbalanced and generally is much softer than the Ventus models.
@@johnlawsongolf I actually meant their Tour Chrome, not the Alta CB. It's 4.0 torque, 276 frequency, 64g weight
@@whaleshark2625 Yes,, sorry that's the one I meant. They tend to be quite soft curiously. I'm not a big fan of that shaft.
so they just put + on the shaft and charge you extra 200. okay I'll stick to the og ventus