Best solution for both minorities and majority feel secure is to abolish minority status, uphold the principle of Equality before Law and Equal Treatment under Law. When law is equally available to all many of the evils will cease to exist.
Bravo bravoNupurji .. you called the spade a spade, without beating about the bush, and trying to be politically correct..You are the Voice of all Real Hindus ,, that does not mean , Kattar Hindus.. Thank you . And, if,for speaking the truth , one is going to be branded kattar, SO BE I T !!!
Both the judge and the sardar are wish-washy and not addressing the real issue... excuse they have, that we are not on Sabarimalai issue now.. They did not do justice to Nupur’s Voice , whichindeed!is People/ majority voice which has been ignored for2000+ years.. garbage arguments , after genocide after genocides of Hindus consistently..
Brilliance and Sai Deepak.... i am amazed how ill informed the judges are... they dont seem to be Indians only ..are they so far from not understanding Indian culture and traditions and the Hindu faith.. looks like all studied in convents and then abroad and also part of lutien gang,,,
Everyone is praising j sai deepak in the comment section, and rightly so. He was rigorous, to the point and logical. But nupur j sharma spoke the words out of my own heart. I absolutely agree that judicial system today is anti hindu and anti dharmic faiths and pro abrahamic faiths.
When Sardar ji said, Majority is feeling persecuted at 23:00 minute, I think He forgot our past. We though were majority we were persecuted. #Never_Forget our past. Yes I fear !slam. And I think we are still getting persecuted. Yes I fear !slam. because its aggressive and you cant change my mind. Just look at western countries what are they doing there.
Sardarji & ex-judge both fail to understand female panelist's point. She's right to criticize judiciary specifically on faith issues. Courts are comfortable & quick to issue Anti- Hindu or attack/ban Hindu traditions but never dare to touch ant other religion.... But both Sardar & Judge just fail to get this point & generalize the judiciary verdicts & blame their failures on system & virtue-signal by telling the women to stop dividing the nation on religion.!!! Its the judiciary that's doing it idiots.
When Sardar ji said, Majority is feeling persecuted at 23:00 minute, I think He forgot our past. We though were majority we were persecuted. #Never_Forget our past. Yes I fear !slam. And I think we are still getting persecuted. Yes I fear !slam. because its aggressive and you cant change my mind. Just look at western countries what are they doing there.
@@amishbhat3560 Lol 🤣 screenshot this and look into the mirror and say "i am a stupid person" till you realise it. I don't education is reason why you compare zakir naik fellow to SJD.
When Sardar ji said, Majority is feeling persecuted at 23:00 minute, I think He forgot our past. We though were majority we were persecuted. #Never_Forget our past. Yes I fear !slam. And I think we are still getting persecuted. Yes I fear !slam. because its aggressive and you cant change my mind. Just look at western countries what are they doing there.
Am very happy , Sri J Sai Deepak honoured Sri k Parasaran and the whole Legal Luminary family dedicated to SANAATANA DHARMA ..We admire Sri Sai Deepak's very Clear and Transparent views .. Smt Sandhyaji and Nupurji also have Real Sincere and serious concerns to present on behalf of lay citizen of Bharat.. Thank you for being our Representatives..
On one hand they proudly accept reservation in name of religion and when spoken about it public you get argument like "stop dividing people on religion " which sounds hypocritical
Sati is not the way it is showed by the British white man. All the supreme court judges should be given classes on our ancient HINDU history & Hindu culture
@1superbcc When is Modiji's party going to fight to return Hindu temples and trusts to the Hindus as has been accorded to other religions. I am disappointed by our own people.
What I am observing is that the young fellow Indian are more relevant and makes all sense while the old are like dronacharya who feels like paying debt to the erstwhile system developed over the years
True Sir. Justice Santhosh Hegde 75 years who is Son of Justice KS Hegde who was one of the judges of the 1972 KESHAVANADA BHARATI CASE said once when he addressed the young crowd Please do not follow his generation they all have inherited the legacy of the British system which is still prevalent especially in the Judiciary. He encouraged young minds to nurture their future independently
Swamiye Sharanam Ayyapa JAI shree Ram. What also happened is that kerala was drowned for 2yrs in a row. Which never happened. Pamba river changed its course. Marking the rise of the intellectual brahmachari Kshatriya. Swamiye sharanam Ayyapa. Thank u deepak sir.
Classic example of judiciary failure Emergency Allowing secular to be included illegally in constitution Shah BANO case Ram temple Shabarimala Salman khan case-judge needs to step up and convict a criminal. That's why he's a judge. And evidence was leading.
As usually SaiDeepak rocked. Nupur ji straight , not mincing the words superb. As a common man I do not understand judicial processes, but , giving Judgements based on Lawers urguments only then how can courts take cases 'Sumoto' ?
If the supreme jesters don't have time to researching the relevant scriptures and traditions of the issue at hand, why adjudicate on it? Why not say, "we're not competent to rule in this issue", and recuse themselves?
Dear Navdeep Singh, Judiciary or Judgments on ANY CASE is NOT 50-50. It obviously changes case by case. In case of Anti-Indic Cases it's infact a direct 100-0 assault and stacked up against Indics. Such cases are mostly a war on India & Indian Culture by "Others"
The gentleman who asked why the judges don't consult hindi version of the constitution where the terms are used from our tradition should have known the milords are all english educated and can't read, write or speak in hindi or any other INDIAN languages. Don't put too much pressure on the milords that they should have ability to read the constitution in INDIAN language. They may pass judgement like judges are persecuted in INDIA, so democracy is in danger.
This is an intellectual discussion and Indians are not generally intellectual. I'd say 10% are. If you want to see millions of views go check out a shitty kareena kapoor video or better still sunny leone.
I m a common man No knowlege of legality. But according to honorsble retired judge lawers too matter than how can i expect a justice when i have small money to pay, cannot higher suitable lawer with high fees. Or justice is all about lawer qualification Or justice is only concern to quality of lawer. Plaease donot prosecute hindu and like community as they r liberals. It so bad It defeat the main aim of our constitution
I am looking at sai last 6 months. Being in Pondy,,, I narrowly missed him. I know this venue hardly 2 kms away from my res... I hope next time there is publicity about his visits
The SC is a colonial institution! Colonial in the way they look at the “natives” from the point of the view of the coloniser ! They are more English than the English today.
Horrible sound... again... How difficult is this guys? Please fix your sound system. No point having such brilliant people for a discussion and their message not going to your intended audience properly...
It seems to me that ours is the ONLY democracy in the world in which the word "majoritarianism" is brandied about by a significant number of citizens with a negative connotation. Does this mean that a significant number of Indian Citizens do not understand the meaning of "Democracy" itself or based on the effective closure of MAJORITY participation (or reflection on majority of sentiments) by Indian Jurisprudence since 1947, the word "majoritarianism" acquired an almost UNLAWFUL meaning in the minds of illiterate citizens.
Indian judiciary is colonial. It runs in English and hence outcasts Indians by expecting them to rely on a foreign langauge for their legal issues. It is based on English common law which has nothing to do with India, Asia or any other non-White or North Western European society. So it is entirely slavish and made by house slaves of English. Common law system enforces future judgments to follow past judgements instead of applying law specifically for each case and derive judgement from laws.
Fine discussion on various challenges before our judiciary and its (biased) functioning over a long time. Though the session was an hour long, I felt it should have been extended to let panelists make their points and counterpoints freely, besides taking few more questions from the audience at the venue. The purpose of such sessions is to educate the general public too on various contentious points being discussed by SMEs at such sessions. Of course, such sessions should address issues and not individuals or stakeholders of a system venting their anger against other stakeholders, or to settle personal scores. Overall this was a very insightful session though.
There are programs in the west where are the program duration the conversation is taken to the internet space where the panel can deal with online questions and further discussions.
@@Ragameiste In India you can rarely engage in a decent discussion/debate on social media platforms with 'eminent' persons, as such people consider themselves as celebrities and don't respond if one doesn't have a blue tick after their Twitter / FB handle. It's all for self-publicity, not with genuine urge to discuss any issue.
For one faith (Islam) court is deciding based on religious text(Koran) and for other(Hinduism) it is deciding based on "cold" constitutional interpretation driven by imposed colonial morality
Mr judge, the Constitution is not at all, as the Framers would have wanted it to be..it was verbatim, Government of India Act , as promulgated by the British ..wholly and solely ..with Britain’s nefarious, selfish goals in mind.. The People of India had no say in the matter.. Secondly, 100s of one party , one dynasty biased reforms have been introduced surreptitiously .. Don{t beat around the bush and blame the Framers..
In Mahabharata there were seven successive generations of widows Starting from Satyavati to the wife of Parikshit. Some of the widowsvbecame mothers- Ambika, a widow, was the mother of Dhritsrashtra and Ambalika , another widow, was the mother of Panduraju. Then Uttara, a widow, gave birth to Parikshit. The lies told by Ramamohan Roy are there to be seen. You don't need rocket science to expose the lies of Brahmosamaj.
Absolutely. Also, if sati was a truly indian practice, why kaushalya, sumitra and kaikayi were not set on fire? These leftist chrislamocommies are bloody bastards!!
I am from Bengal and Sati was real. It was just not as prevalent as our the leftist historians claim. But it did happen. It wasnt a lie and many many literature talks about the practice. Its well documented. It wasnt a Hindu practice. But a social evil in certain regions like Bengal. From what I know it started happening after British changed inheritence laws for Hindus while Muslims as always had their own law.
First of all decolonize the Indian Laws, Courts and police system. These white Christian laws should go. Dharma should be the basis of Law. We have Vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharata and Puranas, Smritis and other books that expounded Laws. Rama uttered the sloka "Jananee Janmabhoomischa Swargadapi Gareeyasi"- who said better any time and anywhere? For example Narada in Sabha Parvam, Nahusha in Aranya Parvam, Yama in Aranya Parvam, Bheeshma in Shnati Parvam, Dhritarashtra in Ashramavasa Parvam and Krishna throughout the book of Mahabharata explain how laws should be. Then we have Artha sastra of Chanakaya (Kautilya) that is in no way inferior to any European law books. In England, laws were made to favour the Peers, Lords, Ladies and the Royalty. And we adopted this for India- which is wrong. In any given law of Europe, you have loop holes purposely written to continue the oppression and suppression of the poor and oblige the rich. For example, in any European Law, the 4th clause contradicts 10th clause that contradicts 12th clause. That reminds us of the Bible where Peter contradicts Paul, Paul contradicts Jesus and Jesus contradicts both Peter and Paul. This confusion is needed to exploit the lower classes. A good lawyer and a corrupt Judge will invariably work for upper classes who feed them. Get rid of the present Constitution (it is anti Hindu anyway) and frame a new one. Then elaborate and promulgate fair laws that are conducive to the betterment of all classes of the society. In my humble opinion, Sai Deepak is not the last word either on Law or on Constitution.Just like Ranganthan, Abhijit Ayer, Prakash Singh are not last words in their half baked theories on history and society.
Judiciary can't say, "here we are, to order/direct the executive/legislature since they failed in their basic duty". If that were to be the "reason" for the judiciary to order/direct the other two pillars of our democracy, and to justify what clearly was judicial overreach, which other authority should order/direct the judiciary on their horrible record at their basic duty of dispensing justice to the common man (and more importantly, in reasonable time) that the judiciary failed so miserably at? Under which provision of our constitution can judiciary place themselves superior to the executive/legislature? Further, the conduct of our higher judiciary is ludicrous to say the least. Highly questionable too. What of the Midnight hearings? Midnight sanction of bails?? Courts sitting beyond working hours in certain high-profile cases??? More than ridiculous was when some four judges put forth their grievances in what they said, wasthe people's court?!! Sad that there didn't exist an authority that could outrightly dismiss those justices for this highly unacceptable conduct. Biased..corrupt..incompetent...arrogant..whimsical..lazy..is the public perception of our judiciary today. I really shiver at the thought..what happens to our nation and democracy if people take law into their hands on account of the inordinate delay in the dispensation of justice? or if people resort to physical violence and attack judges, exasperated at the kind of judgements they pass in matters of faith. Time for a thorough overhaul of our judicial system and to create a mechanism to make judges accountable for their work turnout and dismiss the incompetent ones when their decrees get upturned often enough in higher courts etc. Read somewhere, that a justice who didn't pass a single judgement during his whole tenure at high court got elevated to the supreme court! Our judicial system is in shambles. Common man has almost lost his faith in our judiciary. That is a very dangerous scenario. Wish the eminent of this country lent their minds, gave a deep thought on this very important organ for our democracy to flourish.
If you want to see how low our SC has gone check this out: timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sc-to-study-if-under-18-muslim-girl-can-marry-on-attaining-puberty/articleshow/71072845.cms
Sai Deepak, words cannot describe your brilliance
Agree with the journalists that judiciary must be held accountable, when the govt is held responsible why is judiciary above ALL others??
Best solution for both minorities and majority feel secure is to abolish minority status, uphold the principle of Equality before Law and Equal Treatment under Law. When law is equally available to all many of the evils will cease to exist.
I fast forwarded mostly when ever the judges spoke. They dodged the questions and made no sense.
Nuper ma'am and Shri Sai Deepak 🔥🔥
Bravo bravoNupurji .. you called the spade a spade, without beating about the bush, and trying to be politically correct..You are the Voice of all Real Hindus ,, that does not mean , Kattar Hindus.. Thank you . And, if,for speaking the truth , one is going to be branded kattar, SO BE I T !!!
Both the judge and the sardar are wish-washy and not addressing the real issue... excuse they have, that we are not on Sabarimalai issue now.. They did not do justice to Nupur’s Voice , whichindeed!is People/ majority voice which has been ignored for2000+ years.. garbage arguments , after genocide after genocides of Hindus consistently..
Bakula your comments are excellent
Sai Deepka simply rocks..
By far the best session PLF has to offer this year.
47:36 everyone starts giggling.. loved it 😂😂😂 it's as if the class teacher calling out the name of the naughty kid in a class
Nupurji 🙏🙏🙏
Mr Singh spoke clearly
Nupur great .
Brilliance and Sai Deepak.... i am amazed how ill informed the judges are... they dont seem to be Indians only ..are they so far from not understanding Indian culture and traditions and the Hindu faith.. looks like all studied in convents and then abroad and also part of lutien gang,,,
who cared for boring hinduculture
@@Abhijitdas-bf9ky are you bengali ??
Are yar sardar ka time kat ke sai deepak ko do
Rajiv Malhotra should be in this panel.
I was missing him actually!!
Everyone is praising j sai deepak in the comment section, and rightly so. He was rigorous, to the point and logical. But nupur j sharma spoke the words out of my own heart. I absolutely agree that judicial system today is anti hindu and anti dharmic faiths and pro abrahamic faiths.
agree
Same here
When Sardar ji said, Majority is feeling persecuted at 23:00 minute, I think He forgot our past. We though were majority we were persecuted. #Never_Forget our past. Yes I fear !slam. And I think we are still getting persecuted. Yes I fear !slam. because its aggressive and you cant change my mind. Just look at western countries what are they doing there.
Sardarji & ex-judge both fail to understand female panelist's point. She's right to criticize judiciary specifically on faith issues. Courts are comfortable & quick to issue Anti- Hindu or attack/ban Hindu traditions but never dare to touch ant other religion....
But both Sardar & Judge just fail to get this point & generalize the judiciary verdicts & blame their failures on system & virtue-signal by telling the women to stop dividing the nation on religion.!!! Its the judiciary that's doing it idiots.
This guy j sai deepak is literally converting minds...of the sleeping youth.
@Stratus u need to read more, u need to see more Then u will not make such comments.
When Sardar ji said, Majority is feeling persecuted at 23:00 minute, I think He forgot our past. We though were majority we were persecuted. #Never_Forget our past. Yes I fear !slam. And I think we are still getting persecuted. Yes I fear !slam. because its aggressive and you cant change my mind. Just look at western countries what are they doing there.
Next wake up Slogan after vivekananda I suppose
He is pandering to rw sentiment that's it. No one is getting converted. He is just more educated version of Hindu Zakir Naik.
@@amishbhat3560 Lol 🤣 screenshot this and look into the mirror and say "i am a stupid person" till you realise it. I don't education is reason why you compare zakir naik fellow to SJD.
Here for J SAI DEEPAK,... Sir, huge huge fan
@Stratus he's not madrasi, anyway doesn't matter at all, i aspire him a lot✌🏻
J Sai Deepak is blindingly brilliant...the ladies on the team also gave a good volley. Respect.
@Stratus may be you never heard that manu was tamil 😁
When Sardar ji said, Majority is feeling persecuted at 23:00 minute, I think He forgot our past. We though were majority we were persecuted. #Never_Forget our past. Yes I fear !slam. And I think we are still getting persecuted. Yes I fear !slam. because its aggressive and you cant change my mind. Just look at western countries what are they doing there.
Both Mr. Singh and Justice are no match for Mr. J Sai Deepak
Your presence makes me feel secure sir,
million thanks to you for presenting our point
Am very happy , Sri J Sai Deepak honoured Sri k Parasaran and the whole Legal Luminary family dedicated to SANAATANA DHARMA ..We admire Sri Sai Deepak's very Clear and Transparent views ..
Smt Sandhyaji and Nupurji also have Real Sincere and serious concerns to present on behalf of lay citizen of Bharat.. Thank you for being our Representatives..
Ms Nupur and Mr Sai Deepak 👏🙏🏻
Mr. Singh is a hypocrite..to the core.
that is why he shut up midway because he realized he was giving away his position and he was amongst a hostile crowd.
On one hand they proudly accept reservation in name of religion and when spoken about it public you get argument like "stop dividing people on religion " which sounds hypocritical
Sati is not the way it is showed by the British white man. All the supreme court judges should be given classes on our ancient HINDU history & Hindu culture
@1superbcc When is Modiji's party going to fight to return Hindu temples and trusts to the Hindus as has been accorded to other religions. I am disappointed by our own people.
@Stratus that is a compliment coming from you. cheers.
can you put time stamp in your comment
When we have people like this sardar in justice environment then unfair is bound to happen
Sardar ji secular hai
Nupur J Sharma ... one word INCISIVE!
How can a judge be qualified to be a judge without knowing or being aware of the ethos of the country ...
Not only ethos but the big picture.
What I am observing is that the young fellow Indian are more relevant and makes all sense while the old are like dronacharya who feels like paying debt to the erstwhile system developed over the years
True Sir. Justice Santhosh Hegde 75 years who is Son of Justice KS Hegde who was one of the judges of the 1972 KESHAVANADA BHARATI CASE said once when he addressed the young crowd
Please do not follow his generation they all have inherited the legacy of the British system which is still prevalent especially in the Judiciary. He encouraged young minds to nurture their future independently
J Sai Deepak is simply outstanding 👍👍👍👍
J Sai Deepak Killed it!! Amazing, absolutely brilliant.
Old brigade has no match with Mr Deepak,
Sai Deepak obliterated Mr. Singh's weak arguments. Sheer brilliance. Nupur did a magnificent job giving voice to ordinary people's opinions.
Sandhya Jain Mam is fierce. She did not shy away from presenting her points.
Here, only for saideepak
A fake sikh spotted.🤬
Most of the bureaucracy is full of fake sikhs, the great ones are in the defence forces and in the border securing it.
He is not fake sikh. I am punjabi and studied in a sikh school, they all have turned this way.
Nupur and JSai are the real voice of the Hindus. Nupur what you said was absolutely true. You need courage to say that.
Thank you.
Swamiye Sharanam Ayyapa
JAI shree Ram.
What also happened is that kerala was drowned for 2yrs in a row. Which never happened.
Pamba river changed its course. Marking the rise of the intellectual brahmachari Kshatriya.
Swamiye sharanam Ayyapa.
Thank u deepak sir.
Classic example of judiciary failure
Emergency
Allowing secular to be included illegally in constitution
Shah BANO case
Ram temple
Shabarimala
Salman khan case-judge needs to step up and convict a criminal. That's why he's a judge. And evidence was leading.
As usually SaiDeepak rocked. Nupur ji straight , not mincing the words superb. As a common man I do not understand judicial processes, but , giving Judgements based on Lawers urguments only then how can courts take cases 'Sumoto' ?
The judiciary system in Hindusthan is a mockery🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
If the supreme jesters don't have time to researching the relevant scriptures and traditions of the issue at hand, why adjudicate on it?
Why not say, "we're not competent to rule in this issue", and recuse themselves?
Sai Deepak, Sandhya Jain Ji, Nupur Sharma Ji you guys are great 🙏
Dear Navdeep Singh, Judiciary or Judgments on ANY CASE is NOT 50-50. It obviously changes case by case. In case of Anti-Indic Cases it's infact a direct 100-0 assault and stacked up against Indics. Such cases are mostly a war on India & Indian Culture by "Others"
The gentleman who asked why the judges don't consult hindi version of the constitution where the terms are used from our tradition should have known the milords are all english educated and can't read, write or speak in hindi or any other INDIAN languages. Don't put too much pressure on the milords that they should have ability to read the constitution in INDIAN language. They may pass judgement like judges are persecuted in INDIA, so democracy is in danger.
A great admirer of Mr J Sai Deepak 🙏
Sai Deepak the God.
Very well said nupur ji. Kisiki himmat nahi Ye puchhne ki
Even sai couldn't ask what nupur ji asked
This needs to have more views
youtube is doing everything so that it doesn't have more views
This is an intellectual discussion and Indians are not generally intellectual. I'd say 10% are. If you want to see millions of views go check out a shitty kareena kapoor video or better still sunny leone.
I think most people skip it when they see it's more than an hour long, maybe they can make abridged versions about 20 minutes long.
I came for J Sai Deepak ...and I found Ms Nupur Sharma.... Just Brilliant
Navdeep Singh's argument lacked base. He had no base and was just talking gibberish.
Deepak you are true to your name
I m a common man
No knowlege of legality.
But according to honorsble retired judge lawers too matter than how can i expect a justice when i have small money to pay, cannot higher suitable lawer with high fees.
Or justice is all about lawer qualification
Or justice is only concern to quality of lawer.
Plaease donot prosecute hindu and like community as they r liberals.
It so bad
It defeat the main aim of our constitution
Only here for Sai Deepak
Me too..👍
I am looking at sai last 6 months. Being in Pondy,,, I narrowly missed him. I know this venue hardly 2 kms away from my res... I hope next time there is publicity about his visits
but this concern for binarification come up ONLY WHEN THE HINDUS are being persecuted in the facade of being prosecuted
SAI DEEPAK IS THE MOST BRILLIANT AND INSPIRING MAN I'VE SEEN IN RECENT TIMES, HE IS THE ONE TO LOOK UP TO
Sardarji lawyer is no match for J sai Deepak. Sardarji speaks only in rhetorics and is completely ignorant of the point of view of the Hindus.
@30:00 Sai Deepak hits the last nail on cases related to Faith.
You are not dividing if you hear and decide on the basis of that Particular faith.
J sai Deepak is superb at his best
Sai Deepak Sir is just brilliant!
here for sai deepak
Nupur dominated clearly 👍🏼
sai bhaiya sabse mahan⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
The SC is a colonial institution! Colonial in the way they look at the “natives” from the point of the view of the coloniser ! They are more English than the English today.
So true. Their Judgement is binding but they are not accountable.
Horrible sound... again...
How difficult is this guys?
Please fix your sound system.
No point having such brilliant people for a discussion and their message not going to your intended audience properly...
J Sai Deepak (Chair) 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Slow clap for J. Sai Deepak at 30:00. Way to put it succinctly. Kudos.
It seems to me that ours is the ONLY democracy in the world in which the word "majoritarianism" is brandied about by a significant number of citizens with a negative connotation. Does this mean that a significant number of Indian Citizens do not understand the meaning of "Democracy" itself or based on the effective closure of MAJORITY participation (or reflection on majority of sentiments) by Indian Jurisprudence since 1947, the word "majoritarianism" acquired an almost UNLAWFUL meaning in the minds of illiterate citizens.
J Sai Deepak rocks.....
Who is this sardarji? Another secularist 🙄 These kind of people are the reason we have problems.
At we found a voice/ foram to express our view. Thank God 70 years after so called independence we found courage to express ourselves.
800 years of Islamic and 200 years of British. Takes time to find your footing.
Add another 60 plus Khangress rule
Here only for Sai Deepak sir!
30:02 to 33:32 Unbelievable how much Sai can pack in just 3min 30sec. The man is beyond brilliant!
Mr Sai qualitatively qualify for absolute distinction
Indian judiciary is colonial.
It runs in English and hence outcasts Indians by expecting them to rely on a foreign langauge for their legal issues.
It is based on English common law which has nothing to do with India, Asia or any other non-White or North Western European society. So it is entirely slavish and made by house slaves of English.
Common law system enforces future judgments to follow past judgements instead of applying law specifically for each case and derive judgement from laws.
Agreed
Sai Deepak..crisp and clear.
Fine discussion on various challenges before our judiciary and its (biased) functioning over a long time. Though the session was an hour long, I felt it should have been extended to let panelists make their points and counterpoints freely, besides taking few more questions from the audience at the venue. The purpose of such sessions is to educate the general public too on various contentious points being discussed by SMEs at such sessions. Of course, such sessions should address issues and not individuals or stakeholders of a system venting their anger against other stakeholders, or to settle personal scores. Overall this was a very insightful session though.
There are programs in the west where are the program duration the conversation is taken to the internet space where the panel can deal with online questions and further discussions.
@@Ragameiste In India you can rarely engage in a decent discussion/debate on social media platforms with 'eminent' persons, as such people consider themselves as celebrities and don't respond if one doesn't have a blue tick after their Twitter / FB handle. It's all for self-publicity, not with genuine urge to discuss any issue.
@@ramesh_iyer So unfortunate if that is true because only a few have access to these programs live.
@@Ragameiste Yes. And podcasts are not very interactive in India !
Vo har debate me Rahul Gandhi ki bezzati krni zaruri hai kya😂😂😂
J.Saideepak brilliant as ever and ready with logical counterpoint.
It took a country with 130 crore to produce one Sai Deepak, not good enough.
Very good comment.
The 2 persons representing the courts were too casual in their approach.
Judicial reformation is very much necessary. Anti Hindu stance should be condemned.
The quality of the discussion is very good. Thanks, for all
I found Nupur s question best
For one faith (Islam) court is deciding based on religious text(Koran) and for other(Hinduism) it is deciding based on "cold" constitutional interpretation driven by imposed colonial morality
How come Dr.SWAMI is not present or this platform is bull shit
Mr judge, the Constitution is not at all, as the Framers would have wanted it to be..it was verbatim, Government of India Act , as promulgated by the British ..wholly and solely ..with Britain’s nefarious, selfish goals in mind.. The People of India had no say in the matter.. Secondly, 100s of one party , one dynasty biased reforms have been introduced surreptitiously .. Don{t beat around the bush and blame the Framers..
Very brilliant case projected by Mr. Sai
In Mahabharata there were seven successive generations of widows Starting from Satyavati to the wife of Parikshit. Some of the widowsvbecame mothers- Ambika, a widow, was the mother of Dhritsrashtra and Ambalika , another widow, was the mother of Panduraju. Then Uttara, a widow, gave birth to Parikshit. The lies told by Ramamohan Roy are there to be seen. You don't need rocket science to expose the lies of Brahmosamaj.
Absolutely.
Also, if sati was a truly indian practice, why kaushalya, sumitra and kaikayi were not set on fire?
These leftist chrislamocommies are bloody bastards!!
I am from Bengal and Sati was real. It was just not as prevalent as our the leftist historians claim. But it did happen. It wasnt a lie and many many literature talks about the practice. Its well documented. It wasnt a Hindu practice. But a social evil in certain regions like Bengal. From what I know it started happening after British changed inheritence laws for Hindus while Muslims as always had their own law.
First of all decolonize the Indian Laws, Courts and police system. These white Christian laws should go. Dharma should be the basis of Law. We have Vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharata and Puranas, Smritis and other books that expounded Laws. Rama uttered the sloka "Jananee Janmabhoomischa Swargadapi Gareeyasi"- who said better any time and anywhere? For example Narada in Sabha Parvam, Nahusha in Aranya Parvam, Yama in Aranya Parvam, Bheeshma in Shnati Parvam, Dhritarashtra in Ashramavasa Parvam and Krishna throughout the book of Mahabharata explain how laws should be. Then we have Artha sastra of Chanakaya (Kautilya) that is in no way inferior to any European law books. In England, laws were made to favour the Peers, Lords, Ladies and the Royalty. And we adopted this for India- which is wrong. In any given law of Europe, you have loop holes purposely written to continue the oppression and suppression of the poor and oblige the rich. For example, in any European Law, the 4th clause contradicts 10th clause that contradicts 12th clause. That reminds us of the Bible where Peter contradicts Paul, Paul contradicts Jesus and Jesus contradicts both Peter and Paul. This confusion is needed to exploit the lower classes. A good lawyer and a corrupt Judge will invariably work for upper classes who feed them. Get rid of the present Constitution (it is anti Hindu anyway) and frame a new one. Then elaborate and promulgate fair laws that are conducive to the betterment of all classes of the society. In my humble opinion, Sai Deepak is not the last word either on Law or on Constitution.Just like Ranganthan, Abhijit Ayer, Prakash Singh are not last words in their half baked theories on history and society.
J sai Deepak Rock!!
Hats off to Sai and Nupur.🙏👍💯🇮🇳
Nupur ma'am convey my feelings as it as
Sardar is a chutiya.
am i the only one who feels the moderator is not giving enough chance to speak to sai deepak.?......running out of time😀
What a brilliant debate... Still, there are very fewer views? where we are
heading
There should be a law against so much hair on hands.
Nupur Sharma👌
What is wrong with your sound!!! If you can bring such illuminated people can't you get a good sound system?!!!
Judiciary can't say, "here we are, to order/direct the executive/legislature since they failed in their basic duty".
If that were to be the "reason" for the judiciary to order/direct the other two pillars of our democracy, and to justify what clearly was judicial overreach, which other authority should order/direct the judiciary on their horrible record at their basic duty of dispensing justice to the common man (and more importantly, in reasonable time) that the judiciary failed so miserably at?
Under which provision of our constitution can judiciary place themselves superior to the executive/legislature?
Further, the conduct of our higher judiciary is ludicrous to say the least. Highly questionable too. What of the Midnight hearings? Midnight sanction of bails?? Courts sitting beyond working hours in certain high-profile cases???
More than ridiculous was when some four judges put forth their grievances in what they said, wasthe people's court?!!
Sad that there didn't exist an authority that could outrightly dismiss those justices for this highly unacceptable conduct.
Biased..corrupt..incompetent...arrogant..whimsical..lazy..is the public perception of our judiciary today.
I really shiver at the thought..what happens to our nation and democracy if people take law into their hands on account of the inordinate delay in the dispensation of justice? or if people resort to physical violence and attack judges, exasperated at the kind of judgements they pass in matters of faith.
Time for a thorough overhaul of our judicial system and to create a mechanism to make judges accountable for their work turnout and dismiss the incompetent ones when their decrees get upturned often enough in higher courts etc.
Read somewhere, that a justice who didn't pass a single judgement during his whole tenure at high court got elevated to the supreme court!
Our judicial system is in shambles. Common man has almost lost his faith in our judiciary. That is a very dangerous scenario.
Wish the eminent of this country lent their minds, gave a deep thought on this very important organ for our democracy to flourish.
If you want to see how low our SC has gone check this out: timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sc-to-study-if-under-18-muslim-girl-can-marry-on-attaining-puberty/articleshow/71072845.cms