What disappoints me most is how the writer of this movie doesn't see anything wrong with his work and will continue going on to write the next avengers movie. Rip marvel
Exactly , like Thanos in endgame , he isn't sympathetic like in infinity war but is still likeable because he is fucking strong and has his own charisma
@@crispyncrunchy1103 if you wanna see pure evil monsters and villains, you’ll love the horror audio drama series created by David Near called “The Morgue Files”th-cam.com/play/PLpWRRYk0UkPgnTp52gI3SfFrNwKd0ZCD9.html
According to the writer of this mess, he wanted Kang to be an underdog with who the audience could sympathize...he failed miserably, and he still thinks that critics are in the wrong and that comic fans can screw themselves. The guy used to write for Rick and Morty; that explains a lot. The worse part is that in Hollywood, you fail upward, so this guy is now writing the kang dynasty. And the future is going to be worse because rumors say that Velma writers are going to join the MCU.
Actually there is one villain right now who is actually a huge threat but Marvel insists that this villain is a hero. I’m talking about Wanda Maximoff.
Honestly, having the first avenger to meet Kang be Ant-Man is very weird. If you want my take on it, Dr. Strange should have been the first avenger of their universe to meet him. In fact, Kang should have been the villain in Multiverse of Madness in my opinion.
In my opinion, they COULD HAVE pulled it off very well, the second trailer was very evident of that. Scott, a man who’s lost time with his daughter, meeting another man that can grant him just that. BUT, we saw none of that in the final film. NONE of it. It wss stupid
Not sure how anyone can take this stupid video seriously when you say Kang made his cameo in Antman… have you not heard of Loki? Lol. Trash opinion video.
So basically an animated movie with a talking cat has more balls, more risks and more effective villains than a Marvel movie? Seen Puss in Boots: The Last Wish yet?
SERIOUSLY!!?!?!? Why is a kids movie taken more seriously with its message, villains, action and brilliant story telling better than half the stuff marvel has put out since endgame (besides a few projects)
I feel like the ending should have Kang go through the portal and leave Ant Man trapped in the quantum realm but because of Scott’s message he sent out the Avengers are aware of him
THEN Scott could've had his own "Wakanda" with all the Quantum Realm warriors. They'd all have a grudge against Kang, so they'd be willing to help The Avengers
That was actually the original ending, where if you remember, Scott & Hope were supposed to be trapped in the Quantum Realm, while Kang was supposed to escape, but they changed it a month before the film released
You are absolutely right when you say "we need the Russo Brothers back". They took the Avengers movies and turned them into these big events that nobody could miss out on. Whenever they're involved with a movie, I know that it will defy my expectations. Even though their movies are different in tone, I feel like that they're the modern day answer to the Coen Brothers. Both duos have movies that people immediately recognise, even if they haven't seen them.
Honesty when I watched this movie in theaters with my family and saw the two villains in the movie Kang and Modok I thought in my head “Eric is gonna hate these villains.”
Are you happy now? And by the way, just because Kang is less known than Doom, it doesn't mean that he doesn't deserve his own mcu saga. Not everything is about Doom.
THANK YOU. FINALY someone has finaly said how stupied the end credits sean was. like how is the strongest kang beated so easly by ants but they want us to be afraid about the other ones. also didnt the futuristic one look like brainiac from injustice 2. even though he is most likely not dead, they ruined his whole intimidashion value by puting him in this movie
I am completely over the MCU's corny jokes.. But my biggest problem with Kang was that he was supposed to have 41st century technology and absolutely none of that seemed on display in this movie. That just told me that the writers have a very limited imagination.. Ultimately this movie just didn't make me feel anything.
For a villain who can travel through time, crush people with telekinesis, blast people out of existence, and possess technology and weaponry centuries from the future, he got owned by the ant family???
I heard that Kevin Feige was a fan of Rick and Morty and hired the writers of that show. Jesica Gao (She-Hulk), Michael Waldron (Loki and Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, and Avengers: Secret Wars) and Jeff Loveness ( Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania, Avengers: The Kang Dynasty)
I mean Civil War, Infinity War, and Endgame were written by the guys who did Thor The Dark World and Pain And Gain. Both films that got extremely mixed reviews. All I’m saying is just give them another chance, and besides Jeff knows about the bad reviews, so maybe he wants to improve upon what he did with Quantumania with his next film Kang Dynasty
Quantumania really should have been a tense movie where our heroes battled against a more terrifying/intriguing Modok. Once Modok is defeated our heroes are hit in the face with the introduction of Kang. (who was never known by anyone even Janet. Also, think of Darth Vader and Palpatine.) Kang easily defeats our heroes. Kang Brutally kills Janet and Hank. Scott, Hope, and Cassandra barely escape with horrified/Saddened looks on their faces. And throughout the Marvel films, we see post-credits scenes of Kang killing multiverse versions of Marvel heroes to slowly gain pieces of "something" to control the multiverse. Also another suggestion Have Kang kill Cassandra I know it's gnarly but wouldn't you say it would make Kang instantly memorable as the first Marvel villain who killed a child on screen in full display as her loved ones watched?
It's because of Modok's design that I can't watch this movie anymore. He just looks too uncanny. About Kang murdering Cassie...wow, that would really be ballsy for Marvel to do. A villain murdering a.child but we got to know.
MCU didn’t need another ‘Thanos’. They should have scaled the conflicts down and been more nuanced with the affect the snap had on all levels. As for kang, he sucks. As does the MCU at this point.
Chukwudi Iwuji, Keith David, Tony Todd, Mahershala Ali, and obviously Giancarlo Esposito would have been much better as Kang. Because those guys can actually act.
Just gonna correct something you said, Kang didn’t originate in this movie, he was originally set up in Loki when Sylvie and Loki met the one running the TVA, sure it was a variant like every Kang we see, but to say he was set up and introduced in this movie is false when he showed up in Loki. I’m not trying to be malicious, just correcting something.
I've seen a couple of people in the comments say that Kang doesn't necessarily need to have a sympathetic side, and honestly, I agree. I think that he should've been a psychopath. When Kang was interrogating Scott and Cassie, I felt like Kang should've killed Cassie and brought her back to life, just to illustrate that he can control Scott (since hurting him doesn't really work) and give him what he wants, which is more time with his daughter.
Yikes, that sounds good. Kang could kill her in a torturous way. Leave her dead for a while, have Scott rage, and threaten to kill Kang for murdering her. Kang rolls his eyes and revives Cassie. He then taunts Antman by saying something like, "Give me what I want, and you can have more time with her. Failure to do so, and you'll have no more time with her." Scott is still shocked at Cassie's resurrection he can't answer, so Kang proceeds to kill her again. This snaps Antman out of his shock, and he pleads with Kang, promising him he'll do what he wants if he lets his daughter go.
@jacindaellison3363 Exactly, like, imagine this, the group is in the QuantumRealm, Janet is already on the move and is elusive about who's here and why she is absolutely scared and funnily enough running for her life *marvel joke*. Janet finally explains to her husband and daughter that when she was taken into the Quantum Realm, she wasn't the only hero there. We see Janet in her wasp outfit alongside different versions of the Avengers: Iron Man, Hulk (Savage or Professor Hulk, the cool one with the ponytail), Thor, Ant-Man (Janet can be in a relationship with this version of Hank during this time), Captain America (They don’t have to be the same cast or have their face shown, but they can experiment with each character costume by utilizing concept that wasn't used without over designing the suit. This is the time to experiment with the status quo, aka Marvel Formula, like the jokes, snarky characters, designs, by testing out others avenues to see if it works. Anyway, the Avengers, alongside an army of resistance fighters are shown to be awesome but very urgent in a mini fight scene by either defeating Kang's army/or completing a crucial objective, until Kang shows up and he Disrespectfully murders every avenger (earned and push that PG-13) except Janet who escapes tearfully and had been hiding since. No jokes to undercut the scene. The scene is heavy. Just silence. This sets up Kang as an massive threat from the start and need to be taken seriously. Apologies for the long comment.
Here are some things that should have happened 1.Kang should have been in a post credit for Dr.Strange 2 2.Kang should have killed the entire Antman family except Cassie Lang and Modok should have also died due to Kang
@@nathanthompson6720 Dr strange 2 was a multiverse movie that focused on the Marvel multiverse. Kang making an appearance would kickstart the whole Kang vs avengers storyline
In my personal opinion his motivation should have been he wants to CONQUER the multiverse so he can stop the chaos in the multiverse and stop people from ruining the timelines
Wont work since in loki they had him get killed cause he was bored of it lmao wouldnt make sense to have him go through the same steps again if we already know the ending of his ark(getting killed by sylph)
His name is kang the CONQUEROR for a reason lol that's his plan and motivation but it's stupid cause they already showed him getting beat by antman and killed by female loki lol Edit Mb I forgot I commented on this before lmao
Kang really should’ve been only a cameo, like thanos in guardians of the galaxy and modok should’ve been the real villain, and have Hank or and Janet redeem him, not hope telling him not to be a dick, that’s just dumb Edit addition: his motivation should’ve been the same from loki where he wants to destroy universes to stop a possible multiversal war
I do think his more human side needs to be developed. At the same time he is driven by stopping the multiverse from colliding and killing itself. He does that by killing timelines. Problem with that is that it causes war and he who remains takes control. He’s seen so much death that life doesn’t matter to him, only what others can give him. It doesn’t seem like good writing but people who kill consistently get desensitized to it and lean more into it
I think ant man should have been stabbed by Kang while they’re trying to fight him and he dies. Then Cassie gets overpowered but puts up an okay fight. I’d also want Kang to kill Janet and modok kill hank. I’d destroy the ant man franchise to show how powerful kangs army is
>Council of Kangs exiled a supposedly dangerous Kang rather than executing him >exiled him with his deathship >Kang killed multiple Avengers across the multiverse >Kang got clapped by grade C comic relief Avengers and actual futurist socialist ants >Kang(s) try to conquer the multiverse - with an infinite amount of universe, meaning your effort of conquering them all are uselessly futile, with infinite amount of worlds come infinite amount of possibility, what even is the stake here anymore? seriously, who proofread this script?
I feel like this movie would have been fixed by antman dying or him in the wasp being stuck in the realm with Kang. The we just both have to lose line is so good and would have been a good set up for his death
Tony:” if you’re nothing without that suit than you shouldn’t have it” Me: Kang, if you’re not intimidating without that suit than you shouldn’t be a villain.
yeah without his tech at the end of the day he's just like a normal human guy. just look how easily his variant The One Who Remains was taken out at the end of loki they just stabbed him. he's not a space god, or an immortal demon or something he's just a guy with really advanced tech. they should have just made him the villain of Fantastic 4 or something i don't think Kang has ever been big bad material. he's strong but he's no Thanos or Doctor Doom or something
This movie would of been much better with Skrylar and Modok being the villains. I still stick with my main idea that Immortus is the real next Thanos and is the 1 who end up becoming He Who Remains.
While it’s Marvel’s loss that they haven’t rehired the Russo Brothers, it has been announced that they were interested in directing Batman: The Brave and the Bold for James Gunn’s DCU (which would be AMAZING).
I don’t blame Johnathan Majors for this at all. It’s who wrote the script. For the record I didn’t think Ant Man 3 was bad but more so just disappointing
If you want to see a better representation of Kang and MODOK, you can watch Avengers Earth's Mightiest Heroes. Thanks for pointing out your problems with Kang. My main problems since I didn't watch Quantumania is almost everything about him on a basis. 1. He doesn't look intimidating. Kang is supposed to be calm and collected, he acts more impulsive. 2. The multiverse. Isn't Kang's whole philosophy about TIME, NOT the Multiverse? 3. Jonathan Majors. I have nothing against Jonathan Majors, but I think he was miscast, even with the bad writing. In the comics, Kang is white, but this doesn't matter as much because he has a blue mask-face. In this movie, it looks like he's barely in blue and even when he IS in his mask-face, it looks fake and nothing like in the comics. It just feels like they want us to know that a black man is playing the new villain for representation. Also, Eric, 5:36, who might this be offensive to? And I'm assuming by how you talked about MODOK, he's a favorite villain of yours.
Kang's obsession with the multiverse starts when he spreads the spirit of his one and only love Ravonna Renslayer and splits her infinitely across the timestreams in order to have infinite chances to save her and spend his life with her. Which ofcourse turns out to be impossible and he only created an infinite torture chamber for himself.
In my opinion, the movie should have been based off of the line, "I dont have to win, we both just have to lose". It sets scott as the main character and we see a much more powerful version of antman and kang. Modok should have been a side antagonist who injures cassie, this enraged scott dosent think straight. He goes to fight kang and saves cassie and she leaves the quantam realm, while kang and scott are still in the quantam realm fighting. Thats when the last fight scene happens, wasp comes to help. But in this instance, they fail. Kang spares them which shows that they are nothing compared to him, and kang escapes the quantam realm. Since scott already sent the message, an end credit scene could be someone like falcon or hulk reciving this message and then the movie ends. We didnt even need that stupid council of kang credits scene, we could have just seen that scene when scott was talking to kang about why hes there in the first place. The hulk/falcon scene sets up the young/next avengers. Which could be a movie before kang dynasty setting them up becuse somehow they have to include like 8-10 avengers in one movie which will probably be 3 hours long, so u do the math
If I wrote the movie I would've made modok the main villain and after they defeat him kang would've showed up and kill ant man and the others with ease, that would've made him look like a force to be reckoned with
Honestly, I just love the representation in the movie. It's nice to see an evil psychopath like myself represented on screen, not those bad guys with a heart of gold or tragic past that every villain has now become.
Thanos is the result of sticking to one of the laws of marketing that MEN OF RENOWNED in the field of marketing understood for decades . "SELL the SIZZLE not THE STEAK" They teased Thanos to us for over 5 years, the human mind is a very strange place, if you allow the idea of a threat to fester and nurture in the mind, by the time the actual threat comes, we've already solidified that threat in its entirety. Thanos is not as epic as he SEEMS to be, but we bought the sizzle... 😥It's hard to encapsulate. It's like how they say ," a slap hurts more when you know it's comming". Thanos is even worse cuz he was a 5 year slap in the making. Kang carried no weight as a result with regards to the MCU not the comics
Finally someone says what I’ve been thinking. Kang was a massively overhyped villain, and not even a good one beyond that. The only reason he’s even mildly memorable is because of Jonathan Majors, not because the writing on the page was any good.
Imo Kang was a great villian but this is the problem, there's a great villian but no avengers team, how can they do an avengers movie in two years when there's no new team
Have you ever read the comics about his origin? I hope the writers have because Kang has a very good and dramatic story about love there. That was his sole purpose in life. To find a way to be with Ravonna Renslayer. The very act of travelling through time however creates the person he hates the most. Himself. He is destined to become himself over and over again and thus he will fail. He messes up the very thing he loves the most in the most extreme way possible. A life with Ravonna.
Its crazy that Avengers Earths Mightiest Heroes the cartoon show did a better job portraying this very same storyline. I really like the idea if Kang trying to kill Captain Amerucan because he felt it was the best option to save his world
These are all very good and very understandable arguments and thoughts. In my personal opinion I see this as like Thanos in guardians of the galaxy and the age of ultron post credits scene thing. He doesn’t really do much and yet but we know he’s gonna be the big bad guy but as of the first time we see Thanos without the stones or anything he doesn’t look like much of a challenge like Loki and the Chitari. But as time went by we started to see how powerful he was becoming and that’s when we got scared. I’m hoping it’s the same thing where Kang isn’t as powerful right now only for them to show more terrifying versions down the line to where maybe they can feel like the next Thanos. Also side note while I wish they kept the original ending I feel like they did this to build up Kang more. Cuz if he would’ve escaped now it would be like if Thanos got the power stone at the end of Guardians of the galaxy. We would all be waiting for him to do something but since we gotta do more movies we gotta wait so they don’t want to make them so powerful now
But in those movies, they never SHOWED thanos as weak, they just teased him, that’s all. Here, he literally gets his ass wooped, undercutting his power and strength, rather than just teasing him, he was turned into a joke, that is not what they did with thanos in the first avengers and first guardians movie.
@@dosomestuff1949 Well if they made Kang too much like Thanos, that would get boring as well. Imagine every MCU villain being so similar to each other. It's just one movie, though. Wait until Kang is shown more and more.
@@SpecialCinema yea but that doesn’t mean u have kang literally get his ASS WHOOPED in the first movie he appears in. And kang differed from thanos in the fact that he’s a raging psychopath who’s pure evil unlike thanos who thought what he was doing was right.
@@SpecialCinema if they were gonna make kangs entrance in the mcu, he should have entered with a bang, not a whimper that slowly progresses into a bigger threat, because that’s fucking stupid.
@@dosomestuff1949 Well the MCU went this route so let's see. It might make people laugh that he was once a weak villain in Antman, but he is now this big threat, but hey, it does make him interesting. To be fair, Thanos also lost too by underestimating the Avengers. Okay, we never saw him fight at the beginning but still. And him getting more upgraded technology from the MCU is interesting.
I was really excited to see the introduction of Kang but was left disappointed. Imagine if kang had actually killed ant man. Now I love ant man and think he’s a very likeable character but if Kang were to have actually killed him that would have been the coldest introduction to a villain. Thanos killing half the avengers was one thing since we knew they would come back and it was his movie after all. But if Kang were to have killed ant man permanently in his own movie like the trailers were making it out to be then Kang would’ve been the most feared villain in the MCU.
He was supposed to be at full power in this movie. And he STILL couldn't beat Antman. I think the MCU just ruined their new main villain here. And I don't see how they can bring his dignity back at this point. Especially now that they will most likely recast him aswell. I think we just need a new main villain at this point.
@@EricCarter12 idk if he was at “full” power but basically too powerful to have lost probably. I think he should be a protagonist character and we get a special presentation of his backstory before Kang Dynasty and at the end it shows him escaping the engine core and sets up for his return
I wouldn't necessarily say terrible, just kind of inconsistent so far. In Loki, it takes the combined effort of 3 Loki Variants to kill He Who Remains, but then Kang the Conqueror in Quantumania gets beat by Ant-Man, Wasp, Cassie, M.O.D.O.K. and a bunch of giant ants
Avengers Earth‘s mightiest heroes, Kang was better Than the MCU Kang he was powerful, and you understand his motivation and sympathetic, not the MCU version
The MCU is starting to feel like a bad 80s sequel throne so basically during the 80s one movie would do awesome then they'd make another one and another and more and more sequel till eventually the effects look so awful and horrible that eventually it just ends this is what the MCU is becoming they're effects are getting worse and worse
I don’t blame the actor, or the villain. I blame the shitty writers. They started well in his introduction on Loki, but they failed to keep that momentum going with their lackluster movies and shows.
Not sure why anyone liked this movie. Kang was depowered at the end. Cassie was bad, not sure why the Wasp was in it. Not looking forward to any other MCU movies
Great video as always Eric! Speaking of Jonathan Majors, are you looking forward to seeing him as the villain in Creed 3? I’ve heard that is actually quite sympathetic and a villain you can reason with. 😅😅 He blows Kang as a character out of the water already.
Imagine Thanos was first introduced in Spiderman Homecoming and gets his whooped. What a terrible first impression. I am not looking forward to Kang Dynasty at all. I do not give a single fuck about a bunch of joke variants of the same character fighting the Avengers. It makes him look more like just a pest than an actual threat.
I am downright HORRIFIED that writers from Rick and Morty are writing the MCU content. I was very forgiving to Marvel throughout Phase Four. But after Thor: Love and Thunder came out, and after She-Hulk broke me, I came through a few choices I have made. One: The only Disney+ shows based around Marvel I will be watching from now on are What If...? and Loki, because those have competent writing. I will not be watching Iron-Heart, or Echo, or any other live action series to be released, because it is clear that the TV showrunners care about jack shit from the complaints they have heard from fans. The blatant harassing of audiences in their films and shows is also humiliating. In WandaVision, it was the casting of Evan Peters to make a dirty joke. In Eternals, it was casting Harry Styles as Eros just for the sake of it. Ms. Marvel's blatant hypocrisy after what Disney did with the live action Mulan. Thor: Love and Thunder appealing to no one, and I mean no one, but seven year olds (something Chris Hemsworth said a while back), which is clear with the jokes. And She Hulk and the twerking moment, in which Marvel and Jessica Gao were like, "You want maturity? Well, watch this." Most recently, it came with Quantumania. (SPOILERS) 10:42 sums up perfectly what this film's version of M.O.D.O.K. is. Honestly, M.O.D.O.K. is officially my most hated Marvel Cinematic Universe character of all time. The fact that they turned a very disturbing ugly looking character (something that the Avengers game did three years ago), and turned him into one of the WORST CGI characters ever created. Look at all the CGI characters created in the history of cinema. Look at the dinosaurs from Jurassic Park. Look at Gollum. Look at King Kong. Look at Ceaser. Look at Thanos. How did we get from those to M.O.D.O.K.? The jokes involving him were absolutely terrible, especially the dick joke and the died an Avenger line. The latter is, in my opinion, the most insulting line ever from Marvel. Natasha Romanoff willingly jumped off a cliff to save billions of lives. Tony Stark wielded the Infinity Stones and snapped his fingers to save billions of lives. M.O.D.O.K. started out as a corporate douchebag villain, who wore a knock off Ant-Man armor, had his head blown up like a balloon, and jumped in the way of a villain who killed Thor. What a freaking nonsense and stupid line! I didn't like Yellow Jacket in the first Ant-Man movie, but at least when he put on the suit, he was menacing. Here, he was just the worst thing ever put to screen. The worst part about all of this is that we are stuck with these writers from here on in. Forget Jon Favreau and the Russo Brothers. The guys who wrote an animated sci-fi comedy about a drunk scientist and his autistic grandson should make the next batch of projects based around the Marvel comics. Are we supposed to be impressed by that?! The Kang Dynasty and Secret Wars don't look good to me anymore. The Avengers is my favorite film of all time, and Infinity War and Endgame were the perfect finale, so why they are stretching it out makes no sense in of itself. But turning them into a knockoff of a crappy CGI heavy Robert Rodriguez production is just the worst, laziest, stupidest, unpleasant, ungrateful, and most insulting thing you could do to what is essentially Infinity War and Endgame on steroids. I had faith in Marvel a long time ago. I grew up watching the stories and characters of the Infinity Saga unfold, and it felt like a complete narrative. Seeing the Multiverse Saga begin seemed like such a cool prospect. Now I know that it's just going to be quickly forgotten as soon as it showed up. As of now, the comic book movies I want to watch are the DC films, because James Gunn seems to be knowing what he is doing, and DC is my favorite comic book franchise, and tied with Star Wars as my favorite franchise. Gunn will bring new life into the comic book movie genre with Superman Legacy, Lanterns, The Brave and the Bold, Swamp Thing, and many others in the future. As for Marvel, while I will be watching their films, their TV shows, their tie-in specials, their comics, if they are not worth it, I am not paying attention to it. This is not what we wanted from Marvel, and they gave it to us anyway. I have one last message to Marvel. FUCK. YOU! That was a long one, so expect a big read.
I don’t even want to watch Kang Dynasty or Secret Wars if the Russo Brothers don’t work on them. Marvel Executives should see the box offices for Infinity War and Endgame and bring them back in!
I have never seen such a horrific start to a phase before The movie is now tied with Eternals as the worst reviewed MCU film ever, it barely broke even at the box office, and now they have to fire Majors after his abuse scandals. So now we lost their so called biggest threat yet I’m just gonna say it outright. GOTG 3 and the rest of their lineup is gonna fail
Kang should've been saved so he can be the main villian of the 2025 fantastic 4 reboot movie that wouldeve made more sense considering he was Thier villain in the comics atleast Rama tut Kang he never even was Ant-Mans villians in the comics
Kang could've had his presence built like Thanos, but he would in in every movie he appeared in. But no gotcha you thought this movie had a Civil War tone. I bet Marvel is gunna gang bang the Director of Everything all at once with (woke) "IDEAS".
The Real villain isn't Kang... DISNEY IS THE REAL VILLIAN! And I think in new seasons of What If...? They should make an episode titled: What if Kang won?
Speaking of What If, Infinity Ultron is a way more terrifying and consistent villain than Kang. Just like The Lich from Adventure Time, Infinity Ultron’s motivation was always consistent: the destruction of all life in the Multiverse. Simple, but terrifying and effective. Not to mention, Infinity Ultron killed Variants of Iron Man, Hulk, Captain Marvel, Captain America, and Thanos, and almost killed Uatu. He’s arguably the most powerful being the MCU. It certainly doesn’t hurt that Infinity Ultron is voiced by Ross Marquand, a genuinely good actor. I’m sorry, but Jonathan Majors sucks as Kang. Like I said, Keith David would have been MUCH better as Kang, or even Javier Bardem.
Not only the Russos, they need Markus and McFeeley back. They wrote the most iconic Marvel movies, but I think all four of them know better than to tie themselves to this creatively bankrupt steaming dung heap.
When I saw the ending where Scott thinks about what Kang said and then shrugs it off like it was nothing I’m like Eric Carter is going to dislike this because it’s typical MCU where whenever anything serious happens the MCU likes to make it a joke
When you realize the Green Goblin did more in NWH with the short time he had on screen than Kang did in this movie.
Green goblin had 40 minutes wdym
I still cant believe Kang was losing to futuristic ants.
He literally beat them
He lost to MODOK
He didn’t lose, he was barely losing until modok came in but it’s unbelievable
On god
Didn’t he kinda lose the same way in Avengers Earth’s Mightiest Heroes?
What disappoints me most is how the writer of this movie doesn't see anything wrong with his work and will continue going on to write the next avengers movie. Rip marvel
He got fired luckily!
In other words... "Don't give the writers of Rick and Morty any work."
Not every villain needs to have a sympathetic side to them in order to be good. Some villains are just raging psycopaths
I agree, I mean look at Voldemort, he’s not sympathetic at all and he’s most iconic villain we’ve ever gotten
Exactly , like Thanos in endgame , he isn't sympathetic like in infinity war but is still likeable because he is fucking strong and has his own charisma
Yeah, Palpatine is as one note as they come but still amazingly good!
@@crispyncrunchy1103 if you wanna see pure evil monsters and villains, you’ll love the horror audio drama series created by David Near called “The Morgue Files”th-cam.com/play/PLpWRRYk0UkPgnTp52gI3SfFrNwKd0ZCD9.html
Yes but The issue here is they try to make him sympathetic instead of just being straight up that he’s a psychopath
According to the writer of this mess, he wanted Kang to be an underdog with who the audience could sympathize...he failed miserably, and he still thinks that critics are in the wrong and that comic fans can screw themselves.
The guy used to write for Rick and Morty; that explains a lot. The worse part is that in Hollywood, you fail upward, so this guy is now writing the kang dynasty.
And the future is going to be worse because rumors say that Velma writers are going to join the MCU.
No way they are going to hire Velma writers
Please no!
@@dinohunter3467 again, they are rumors
why in the actual crap do they need to hire these garbage writers of a garbage show? rumor or not, this is BS.
@@giorgimamalashvili4220 Because the world we live in is unfair.
Multiverse of Madness was the movie that deserved to introduce Kang.
Kang could’ve still been in ant man 3 but as a cameo telling an evil masked modok to kill them
I was thinking that aswell, make Kang the villain of MOM instead of Wanda, and just make MODOK the villain of Ant Man 3
Well Yh that was actually a multiverse movie
They really need a villain that is a threat and STICKS with it.
They wasted Gorr in Love and Thunder, they wasted Kang again in Quantumania. MCU villains are such a disappointment.
@@lifeloverNorris and I’m not excited for doom
@@lifeloverNorris correct
Thanos is the only threat which MCU showed properly
Actually there is one villain right now who is actually a huge threat but Marvel insists that this villain is a hero.
I’m talking about Wanda Maximoff.
@@MorganLeodeMenezes that’s cause thanos has always been a major threat in the comics he’s one of the strongest characters in marvel while kang isn’t
This is what you get when Rick and Morty writers are hired to write your MCU projects.
Did they actually get the Ricky and Morty writers?
@@aurangzebkhan2185 Yup. For this, and especially She-Hulk!
@@Hewylewis that’s explained a lot
@@Zenkaiju53 simple fix. GET THE RUSSO BROTHERS BACK
Makes sense Rick and morty isn't funny either.
Honestly, having the first avenger to meet Kang be Ant-Man is very weird. If you want my take on it, Dr. Strange should have been the first avenger of their universe to meet him. In fact, Kang should have been the villain in Multiverse of Madness in my opinion.
In my opinion, they COULD HAVE pulled it off very well, the second trailer was very evident of that. Scott, a man who’s lost time with his daughter, meeting another man that can grant him just that. BUT, we saw none of that in the final film. NONE of it. It wss stupid
Not sure how anyone can take this stupid video seriously when you say Kang made his cameo in Antman… have you not heard of Loki? Lol. Trash opinion video.
@@misteripoopedmyself7824 that was a different kang, the discussion is about this kang
It's weird on first thought, but we need to have a weaker character like Scott LOSE to Kang first so that the stronger characters will fear him.
So basically an animated movie with a talking cat has more balls, more risks and more effective villains than a Marvel movie?
Seen Puss in Boots: The Last Wish yet?
I did I and it was amazing definitely a 10/10
SERIOUSLY!!?!?!? Why is a kids movie taken more seriously with its message, villains, action and brilliant story telling better than half the stuff marvel has put out since endgame (besides a few projects)
@@theoneandonlydomtoretto974 one word… WOKE
@@59master60 And also disney
@@theoneandonlydomtoretto974 formulaic
I feel like the ending should have Kang go through the portal and leave Ant Man trapped in the quantum realm but because of Scott’s message he sent out the Avengers are aware of him
Kang should FLAT OUT kills everyone. He is Kang the Conqueror. No way he should be defeated just like this.
@@lifeloverNorris True although he was weakened by the fact that he was trapped in the quantum realm
THEN Scott could've had his own "Wakanda" with all the Quantum Realm warriors.
They'd all have a grudge against Kang, so they'd be willing to help The Avengers
The fact that Scott didn’t warn the avengers when he came back. Fucking worthless mf
That was actually the original ending, where if you remember, Scott & Hope were supposed to be trapped in the Quantum Realm, while Kang was supposed to escape, but they changed it a month before the film released
You are absolutely right when you say "we need the Russo Brothers back". They took the Avengers movies and turned them into these big events that nobody could miss out on. Whenever they're involved with a movie, I know that it will defy my expectations. Even though their movies are different in tone, I feel like that they're the modern day answer to the Coen Brothers. Both duos have movies that people immediately recognise, even if they haven't seen them.
Honesty when I watched this movie in theaters with my family and saw the two villains in the movie Kang and Modok I thought in my head “Eric is gonna hate these villains.”
Fans: We Want Doctor DOOM!!!
Marvel: Hmmm… best I can do is kang
Fans: oh ok this could work this could be the next thanos THIS COULD BE GREA-
Marvel: and he’s written by a guy that was on Rick and Morty
@@furious_pie466 Fans: Fuuuucccckkkk….
Cant wait to see them fail Doom for the 4th freaking time
honestly I'm hoping Kang is just a red herring and that Doom actually will be the main villain of Secret Wars
Are you happy now? And by the way, just because Kang is less known than Doom, it doesn't mean that he doesn't deserve his own mcu saga. Not everything is about Doom.
THANK YOU. FINALY someone has finaly said how stupied the end credits sean was. like how is the strongest kang beated so easly by ants but they want us to be afraid about the other ones. also didnt the futuristic one look like brainiac from injustice 2. even though he is most likely not dead, they ruined his whole intimidashion value by puting him in this movie
MODOK should have been the main villain of Quantumania while Kang is the secret mastermind kinda like Thanos was in Avengers and GOTG.
Immortus looked like Lopan from Big Trouble In Little China. All 3 looked like a reboot for that movie.
The first post credit scene was weird cause of the way the kangs are and looked but it wasn't a problem for the movie they were actually important
Because that kang that was in the QR didn’t have all of his tools if actually paid attention to the movie
scene
I am completely over the MCU's corny jokes.. But my biggest problem with Kang was that he was supposed to have 41st century technology and absolutely none of that seemed on display in this movie. That just told me that the writers have a very limited imagination.. Ultimately this movie just didn't make me feel anything.
If only he said "It's Kanging time". Then Marvel would have sold one Kamgbillion dollars
For a villain who can travel through time, crush people with telekinesis, blast people out of existence, and possess technology and weaponry centuries from the future, he got owned by the ant family???
I heard that Kevin Feige was a fan of Rick and Morty and hired the writers of that show. Jesica Gao (She-Hulk), Michael Waldron (Loki and Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, and Avengers: Secret Wars) and Jeff Loveness ( Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania, Avengers: The Kang Dynasty)
Given how far Rick and Morty has fallen from what it once was lately, this explains a lot on how far the MCU has fallen from what it once was.
Wait. The Avengers movie is called, "The Kang Dynasty"?
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😂😂
I mean Civil War, Infinity War, and Endgame were written by the guys who did Thor The Dark World and Pain And Gain. Both films that got extremely mixed reviews. All I’m saying is just give them another chance, and besides Jeff knows about the bad reviews, so maybe he wants to improve upon what he did with Quantumania with his next film Kang Dynasty
It’s fine if Feige enjoys Rick Morty. It’s a completely different genre in every way. Feige should know this.
@@almightyloaf5434 Russos played a big part there
Quantumania really should have been a tense movie where our heroes battled against a more terrifying/intriguing Modok. Once Modok is defeated our heroes are hit in the face with the introduction of Kang. (who was never known by anyone even Janet. Also, think of Darth Vader and Palpatine.) Kang easily defeats our heroes. Kang Brutally kills Janet and Hank.
Scott, Hope, and Cassandra barely escape with horrified/Saddened looks on their faces.
And throughout the Marvel films, we see post-credits scenes of Kang killing multiverse versions of Marvel heroes to slowly gain pieces of "something" to control the multiverse.
Also another suggestion
Have Kang kill Cassandra I know it's gnarly but wouldn't you say it would make Kang instantly memorable as the first Marvel villain who killed a child on screen in full display as her loved ones watched?
It's because of Modok's design that I can't watch this movie anymore. He just looks too uncanny.
About Kang murdering Cassie...wow, that would really be ballsy for Marvel to do. A villain murdering a.child but we got to know.
MCU didn’t need another ‘Thanos’. They should have scaled the conflicts down and been more nuanced with the affect the snap had on all levels. As for kang, he sucks. As does the MCU at this point.
The actor isn’t even imposing, he doesn’t look like a threat, he looks like a joke in fact. I laughed when he pretended to get angry and look tough.
Yeah Jonathan Majors certainly wrong choice for kang and he's not a good actor I don't know why people find him a great actor?
Chukwudi Iwuji, Keith David, Tony Todd, Mahershala Ali, and obviously Giancarlo Esposito would have been much better as Kang. Because those guys can actually act.
Kang felt so out of place in the antman 3 movie its almost like he walked into a different movie entirely
Just gonna correct something you said, Kang didn’t originate in this movie, he was originally set up in Loki when Sylvie and Loki met the one running the TVA, sure it was a variant like every Kang we see, but to say he was set up and introduced in this movie is false when he showed up in Loki.
I’m not trying to be malicious, just correcting something.
Who cares he sucks no matter where he started.
Well At Least Death In Puss In Boots The Last Wish (2022) Is A Better Written And Threatening Villain.
GOATED Villain
Not to mention CREEPY
@@goldendragon0145 Yes Definitely
I've seen a couple of people in the comments say that Kang doesn't necessarily need to have a sympathetic side, and honestly, I agree. I think that he should've been a psychopath. When Kang was interrogating Scott and Cassie, I felt like Kang should've killed Cassie and brought her back to life, just to illustrate that he can control Scott (since hurting him doesn't really work) and give him what he wants, which is more time with his daughter.
Wow don't give Marvel game but that's actually a great idea ngl.
Better, aging Cassie up and threatening Scott of losing more time.
High Evolutionary is so much better
Yikes, that sounds good. Kang could kill her in a torturous way. Leave her dead for a while, have Scott rage, and threaten to kill Kang for murdering her. Kang rolls his eyes and revives Cassie. He then taunts Antman by saying something like, "Give me what I want, and you can have more time with her. Failure to do so, and you'll have no more time with her." Scott is still shocked at Cassie's resurrection he can't answer, so Kang proceeds to kill her again. This snaps Antman out of his shock, and he pleads with Kang, promising him he'll do what he wants if he lets his daughter go.
@jacindaellison3363 Exactly, like, imagine this, the group is in the QuantumRealm, Janet is already on the move and is elusive about who's here and why she is absolutely scared and funnily enough running for her life *marvel joke*. Janet finally explains to her husband and daughter that when she was taken into the Quantum Realm, she wasn't the only hero there. We see Janet in her wasp outfit alongside different versions of the Avengers: Iron Man, Hulk (Savage or Professor Hulk, the cool one with the ponytail), Thor, Ant-Man (Janet can be in a relationship with this version of Hank during this time), Captain America (They don’t have to be the same cast or have their face shown, but they can experiment with each character costume by utilizing concept that wasn't used without over designing the suit. This is the time to experiment with the status quo, aka Marvel Formula, like the jokes, snarky characters, designs, by testing out others avenues to see if it works. Anyway, the Avengers, alongside an army of resistance fighters are shown to be awesome but very urgent in a mini fight scene by either defeating Kang's army/or completing a crucial objective, until Kang shows up and he Disrespectfully murders every avenger (earned and push that PG-13) except Janet who escapes tearfully and had been hiding since. No jokes to undercut the scene. The scene is heavy. Just silence. This sets up Kang as an massive threat from the start and need to be taken seriously. Apologies for the long comment.
If this movie was written by Rick and Morty, imagine if Kang Dynasty was written by Gravity Falls writers
Here are some things that should have happened
1.Kang should have been in a post credit for Dr.Strange 2
2.Kang should have killed the entire Antman family except Cassie Lang and Modok should have also died due to Kang
I think Hank Pym should've died. Michael Douglas said that he would be done with this character
Why post credits for dr strange 2
@@nathanthompson6720 Dr strange 2 was a multiverse movie that focused on the Marvel multiverse. Kang making an appearance would kickstart the whole Kang vs avengers storyline
In my personal opinion his motivation should have been he wants to CONQUER the multiverse so he can stop the chaos in the multiverse and stop people from ruining the timelines
Wont work since in loki they had him get killed cause he was bored of it lmao wouldnt make sense to have him go through the same steps again if we already know the ending of his ark(getting killed by sylph)
True but I was meaning so he could stop having people like spiderman and doctor strange from messing with the multiverse
And the loki's of course
That’s literally what his motivation was.
His name is kang the CONQUEROR for a reason lol that's his plan and motivation but it's stupid cause they already showed him getting beat by antman and killed by female loki lol
Edit
Mb I forgot I commented on this before lmao
2:39 You know a movie is Bad when Michael Bay is doing a better job than you.
Thanos' build up was insane.
Kang really should’ve been only a cameo, like thanos in guardians of the galaxy and modok should’ve been the real villain, and have Hank or and Janet redeem him, not hope telling him not to be a dick, that’s just dumb
Edit addition: his motivation should’ve been the same from loki where he wants to destroy universes to stop a possible multiversal war
I do think his more human side needs to be developed. At the same time he is driven by stopping the multiverse from colliding and killing itself. He does that by killing timelines. Problem with that is that it causes war and he who remains takes control. He’s seen so much death that life doesn’t matter to him, only what others can give him. It doesn’t seem like good writing but people who kill consistently get desensitized to it and lean more into it
I think ant man should have been stabbed by Kang while they’re trying to fight him and he dies. Then Cassie gets overpowered but puts up an okay fight. I’d also want Kang to kill Janet and modok kill hank. I’d destroy the ant man franchise to show how powerful kangs army is
@@Us3r739 the movie definitely lacks stakes
>Council of Kangs exiled a supposedly dangerous Kang rather than executing him
>exiled him with his deathship
>Kang killed multiple Avengers across the multiverse
>Kang got clapped by grade C comic relief Avengers and actual futurist socialist ants
>Kang(s) try to conquer the multiverse - with an infinite amount of universe, meaning your effort of conquering them all are uselessly futile, with infinite amount of worlds come infinite amount of possibility, what even is the stake here anymore?
seriously, who proofread this script?
I feel like this movie would have been fixed by antman dying or him in the wasp being stuck in the realm with Kang. The we just both have to lose line is so good and would have been a good set up for his death
I’m also disappointed that Kang didn’t win.
if you want a good Kang and Modoc just watch the cartoon The Avengers: Earths Mightiest Heros
Thanks! Will do!
Tony:” if you’re nothing without that suit than you shouldn’t have it”
Me: Kang, if you’re not intimidating without that suit than you shouldn’t be a villain.
yeah without his tech at the end of the day he's just like a normal human guy. just look how easily his variant The One Who Remains was taken out at the end of loki they just stabbed him. he's not a space god, or an immortal demon or something he's just a guy with really advanced tech. they should have just made him the villain of Fantastic 4 or something i don't think Kang has ever been big bad material. he's strong but he's no Thanos or Doctor Doom or something
This movie would of been much better with Skrylar and Modok being the villains. I still stick with my main idea that Immortus is the real next Thanos and is the 1 who end up becoming He Who Remains.
While it’s Marvel’s loss that they haven’t rehired the Russo Brothers, it has been announced that they were interested in directing Batman: The Brave and the Bold for James Gunn’s DCU (which would be AMAZING).
I don’t blame Johnathan Majors for this at all. It’s who wrote the script. For the record I didn’t think Ant Man 3 was bad but more so just disappointing
They cancelded alot of kangs fighting scenes because the CGI wasnt done
Ok now I'm actually worried about Avengers: Kang Dynasty and Secret Wars
#BringRussoBrothersBack
secret wars will most likely do well
If you want to see a better representation of Kang and MODOK, you can watch Avengers Earth's Mightiest Heroes.
Thanks for pointing out your problems with Kang. My main problems since I didn't watch Quantumania is almost everything about him on a basis.
1. He doesn't look intimidating. Kang is supposed to be calm and collected, he acts more impulsive.
2. The multiverse. Isn't Kang's whole philosophy about TIME, NOT the Multiverse?
3. Jonathan Majors. I have nothing against Jonathan Majors, but I think he was miscast, even with the bad writing. In the comics, Kang is white, but this doesn't matter as much because he has a blue mask-face. In this movie, it looks like he's barely in blue and even when he IS in his mask-face, it looks fake and nothing like in the comics. It just feels like they want us to know that a black man is playing the new villain for representation.
Also, Eric, 5:36, who might this be offensive to? And I'm assuming by how you talked about MODOK, he's a favorite villain of yours.
Egyptians
Kang's obsession with the multiverse starts when he spreads the spirit of his one and only love Ravonna Renslayer and splits her infinitely across the timestreams in order to have infinite chances to save her and spend his life with her. Which ofcourse turns out to be impossible and he only created an infinite torture chamber for himself.
When did you officially get tired of the MCU, I’d say around 2017 or 2018.
Same
Same
In my opinion, the movie should have been based off of the line, "I dont have to win, we both just have to lose". It sets scott as the main character and we see a much more powerful version of antman and kang. Modok should have been a side antagonist who injures cassie, this enraged scott dosent think straight. He goes to fight kang and saves cassie and she leaves the quantam realm, while kang and scott are still in the quantam realm fighting. Thats when the last fight scene happens, wasp comes to help. But in this instance, they fail. Kang spares them which shows that they are nothing compared to him, and kang escapes the quantam realm. Since scott already sent the message, an end credit scene could be someone like falcon or hulk reciving this message and then the movie ends. We didnt even need that stupid council of kang credits scene, we could have just seen that scene when scott was talking to kang about why hes there in the first place. The hulk/falcon scene sets up the young/next avengers. Which could be a movie before kang dynasty setting them up becuse somehow they have to include like 8-10 avengers in one movie which will probably be 3 hours long, so u do the math
6:47 this honestly made me laugh so hard, excellent take on the movie keep it up 👍
If I wrote the movie I would've made modok the main villain and after they defeat him kang would've showed up and kill ant man and the others with ease, that would've made him look like a force to be reckoned with
Jonathan major is just bad casting , he doesnt look and act like a phase 2 villain , more like second villain on a least popular avengers movie !
Horrendous 3rd act (like The Batman) diminished Kang, seriously being defeated by ants, so dumb.
The Scarlet Witch is a better villain than Kang but sadly they won't let Elizabeth feel her antagonist fantasy
Honestly, I just love the representation in the movie. It's nice to see an evil psychopath like myself represented on screen, not those bad guys with a heart of gold or tragic past that every villain has now become.
I’m actually really excited for Sam Raimi to write Secret Wars
Thanos is the result of sticking to one of the laws of marketing that MEN OF RENOWNED in the field of marketing understood for decades .
"SELL the SIZZLE not THE STEAK"
They teased Thanos to us for over 5 years, the human mind is a very strange place, if you allow the idea of a threat to fester and nurture in the mind, by the time the actual threat comes, we've already solidified that threat in its entirety. Thanos is not as epic as he SEEMS to be, but we bought the sizzle...
😥It's hard to encapsulate.
It's like how they say
," a slap hurts more when you know it's comming".
Thanos is even worse cuz he was a 5 year slap in the making.
Kang carried no weight as a result with regards to the MCU not the comics
Once you relize this Kan villain has billions or trillions of variants, you lost the sense of importance and weight. You would just say, WHATEVER!
The writer of Quantumania got fired. Let's see how someone else writes Kang...
Imagine being so strong you conquer entire worlds, slaughter entire armies, end TIMELINES, and you still can't kill a bunch of ants.
If you want to see a good portrayal of Kang the Conqueror. Go watch Avengers Earth's Mightiest Heroes.
Finally someone says what I’ve been thinking. Kang was a massively overhyped villain, and not even a good one beyond that. The only reason he’s even mildly memorable is because of Jonathan Majors, not because the writing on the page was any good.
Imo Kang was a great villian but this is the problem, there's a great villian but no avengers team, how can they do an avengers movie in two years when there's no new team
What number would you rate this movie, out of 10?
i would guess a 3-4/10
8/10
I will give this movie 10 out of 10 I don't care about critics and audience score on Rotten tomato
@@aadilshekhi6049 why in the world would you think that
@@Dylan-mo2mr because I love this movie that's it
Have you ever read the comics about his origin? I hope the writers have because Kang has a very good and dramatic story about love there. That was his sole purpose in life. To find a way to be with Ravonna Renslayer.
The very act of travelling through time however creates the person he hates the most. Himself. He is destined to become himself over and over again and thus he will fail. He messes up the very thing he loves the most in the most extreme way possible. A life with Ravonna.
Its crazy that Avengers Earths Mightiest Heroes the cartoon show did a better job portraying this very same storyline.
I really like the idea if Kang trying to kill Captain Amerucan because he felt it was the best option to save his world
@@Aerex12 EMH is fantastic to this day that cartoon has best Dr Doom in 2 episodes than whole fantastic 4 movies
These are all very good and very understandable arguments and thoughts. In my personal opinion I see this as like Thanos in guardians of the galaxy and the age of ultron post credits scene thing. He doesn’t really do much and yet but we know he’s gonna be the big bad guy but as of the first time we see Thanos without the stones or anything he doesn’t look like much of a challenge like Loki and the Chitari. But as time went by we started to see how powerful he was becoming and that’s when we got scared. I’m hoping it’s the same thing where Kang isn’t as powerful right now only for them to show more terrifying versions down the line to where maybe they can feel like the next Thanos. Also side note while I wish they kept the original ending I feel like they did this to build up Kang more. Cuz if he would’ve escaped now it would be like if Thanos got the power stone at the end of Guardians of the galaxy. We would all be waiting for him to do something but since we gotta do more movies we gotta wait so they don’t want to make them so powerful now
But in those movies, they never SHOWED thanos as weak, they just teased him, that’s all. Here, he literally gets his ass wooped, undercutting his power and strength, rather than just teasing him, he was turned into a joke, that is not what they did with thanos in the first avengers and first guardians movie.
@@dosomestuff1949 Well if they made Kang too much like Thanos, that would get boring as well. Imagine every MCU villain being so similar to each other. It's just one movie, though. Wait until Kang is shown more and more.
@@SpecialCinema yea but that doesn’t mean u have kang literally get his ASS WHOOPED in the first movie he appears in. And kang differed from thanos in the fact that he’s a raging psychopath who’s pure evil unlike thanos who thought what he was doing was right.
@@SpecialCinema if they were gonna make kangs entrance in the mcu, he should have entered with a bang, not a whimper that slowly progresses into a bigger threat, because that’s fucking stupid.
@@dosomestuff1949 Well the MCU went this route so let's see. It might make people laugh that he was once a weak villain in Antman, but he is now this big threat, but hey, it does make him interesting. To be fair, Thanos also lost too by underestimating the Avengers. Okay, we never saw him fight at the beginning but still. And him getting more upgraded technology from the MCU is interesting.
Kang is overrated
UNDERrated. Y'all were asking for Doom.
I was really excited to see the introduction of Kang but was left disappointed. Imagine if kang had actually killed ant man. Now I love ant man and think he’s a very likeable character but if Kang were to have actually killed him that would have been the coldest introduction to a villain. Thanos killing half the avengers was one thing since we knew they would come back and it was his movie after all. But if Kang were to have killed ant man permanently in his own movie like the trailers were making it out to be then Kang would’ve been the most feared villain in the MCU.
@Courtlin Sellers well the black panther thing made some sense. Replacing Chadwick Boseman with another actor would be disrespectful.
Kang needs to come back in the next Avengers film and just fuck people up to show that when he’s at full power he can’t be stopped
He was supposed to be at full power in this movie. And he STILL couldn't beat Antman. I think the MCU just ruined their new main villain here. And I don't see how they can bring his dignity back at this point. Especially now that they will most likely recast him aswell. I think we just need a new main villain at this point.
@@EricCarter12 idk if he was at “full” power but basically too powerful to have lost probably. I think he should be a protagonist character and we get a special presentation of his backstory before Kang Dynasty and at the end it shows him escaping the engine core and sets up for his return
This is why I decided to skip this movie. Marvel has declined in quality.
The line have I killed you before. It's the most stupidest line I've ever hear.
Question what do you think of the new Puss in boots movie would love to hear your opinion
Hi Eric. I know that this wasn’t actually a review of this movie,but I’m still curious to know what your score for this movie would be
I wouldn't necessarily say terrible, just kind of inconsistent so far.
In Loki, it takes the combined effort of 3 Loki Variants to kill He Who Remains, but then Kang the Conqueror in Quantumania gets beat by Ant-Man, Wasp, Cassie, M.O.D.O.K. and a bunch of giant ants
Avengers Earth‘s mightiest heroes, Kang was better Than the MCU Kang he was powerful, and you understand his motivation and sympathetic, not the MCU version
I think Russo brothers should be responsible to every mcu project
Its so great to see you again. And also we got sebastains first look in the little mermaid remake what did you think of it?
The MCU is starting to feel like a bad 80s sequel throne so basically during the 80s one movie would do awesome then they'd make another one and another and more and more sequel till eventually the effects look so awful and horrible that eventually it just ends this is what the MCU is becoming they're effects are getting worse and worse
I don’t blame the actor, or the villain. I blame the shitty writers. They started well in his introduction on Loki, but they failed to keep that momentum going with their lackluster movies and shows.
Not sure why anyone liked this movie. Kang was depowered at the end. Cassie was bad, not sure why the Wasp was in it. Not looking forward to any other MCU movies
@courtlinsellers-sd6sc I did, I think Marvel interfered and had it changed to what we got in theaters
The villian should have been villian more associated with the microverse. Maybe psychoman or someone like that.
Kang in the comics is a D LIST villain. Why the hell they even made KANG period.
How is Kang a D-List villain? I thought he was a good villain
@@suqrathassan3860 No. This dudes backstory and time travel is extremely convoluted and makes no legit sense.
@@lordraiden7397 yea its trash
@@lordraiden7397 No it's not. Just because it's complicated it doesn't mean that it's trash. and he's definitely an A list villain.
Great video as always Eric! Speaking of Jonathan Majors, are you looking forward to seeing him as the villain in Creed 3? I’ve heard that is actually quite sympathetic and a villain you can reason with. 😅😅 He blows Kang as a character out of the water already.
Oh and can we agree that kang getting scared a lot by a lot of ants was just so stupid am i right?
You are right. Especially with someone of his power set. What a wuss.
I think villain needs to be threatning. This is why Shao Kahn and All For One works.
Kang lost to ants so I wonder how will he ever be a threat
Don't forget to give the video a 👍. Take Care!
Ok
You too Eric
Ok
You are the worst youtuber I ever seen who ever give you like will be a mother f*****😠😠😠😡😡😡🤬🤬🤬👎👎👎
@@aadilshekhi6049 why
Imagine Thanos was first introduced in Spiderman Homecoming and gets his whooped. What a terrible first impression. I am not looking forward to Kang Dynasty at all. I do not give a single fuck about a bunch of joke variants of the same character fighting the Avengers. It makes him look more like just a pest than an actual threat.
Tell me you haven’t watched Loki without telling me you haven’t watched it
I am downright HORRIFIED that writers from Rick and Morty are writing the MCU content.
I was very forgiving to Marvel throughout Phase Four. But after Thor: Love and Thunder came out, and after She-Hulk broke me, I came through a few choices I have made.
One: The only Disney+ shows based around Marvel I will be watching from now on are What If...? and Loki, because those have competent writing. I will not be watching Iron-Heart, or Echo, or any other live action series to be released, because it is clear that the TV showrunners care about jack shit from the complaints they have heard from fans.
The blatant harassing of audiences in their films and shows is also humiliating. In WandaVision, it was the casting of Evan Peters to make a dirty joke. In Eternals, it was casting Harry Styles as Eros just for the sake of it. Ms. Marvel's blatant hypocrisy after what Disney did with the live action Mulan. Thor: Love and Thunder appealing to no one, and I mean no one, but seven year olds (something Chris Hemsworth said a while back), which is clear with the jokes. And She Hulk and the twerking moment, in which Marvel and Jessica Gao were like, "You want maturity? Well, watch this." Most recently, it came with Quantumania.
(SPOILERS)
10:42 sums up perfectly what this film's version of M.O.D.O.K. is. Honestly, M.O.D.O.K. is officially my most hated Marvel Cinematic Universe character of all time. The fact that they turned a very disturbing ugly looking character (something that the Avengers game did three years ago), and turned him into one of the WORST CGI characters ever created. Look at all the CGI characters created in the history of cinema. Look at the dinosaurs from Jurassic Park. Look at Gollum. Look at King Kong. Look at Ceaser. Look at Thanos. How did we get from those to M.O.D.O.K.? The jokes involving him were absolutely terrible, especially the dick joke and the died an Avenger line. The latter is, in my opinion, the most insulting line ever from Marvel. Natasha Romanoff willingly jumped off a cliff to save billions of lives. Tony Stark wielded the Infinity Stones and snapped his fingers to save billions of lives. M.O.D.O.K. started out as a corporate douchebag villain, who wore a knock off Ant-Man armor, had his head blown up like a balloon, and jumped in the way of a villain who killed Thor. What a freaking nonsense and stupid line! I didn't like Yellow Jacket in the first Ant-Man movie, but at least when he put on the suit, he was menacing. Here, he was just the worst thing ever put to screen.
The worst part about all of this is that we are stuck with these writers from here on in. Forget Jon Favreau and the Russo Brothers. The guys who wrote an animated sci-fi comedy about a drunk scientist and his autistic grandson should make the next batch of projects based around the Marvel comics. Are we supposed to be impressed by that?! The Kang Dynasty and Secret Wars don't look good to me anymore. The Avengers is my favorite film of all time, and Infinity War and Endgame were the perfect finale, so why they are stretching it out makes no sense in of itself. But turning them into a knockoff of a crappy CGI heavy Robert Rodriguez production is just the worst, laziest, stupidest, unpleasant, ungrateful, and most insulting thing you could do to what is essentially Infinity War and Endgame on steroids.
I had faith in Marvel a long time ago. I grew up watching the stories and characters of the Infinity Saga unfold, and it felt like a complete narrative. Seeing the Multiverse Saga begin seemed like such a cool prospect. Now I know that it's just going to be quickly forgotten as soon as it showed up.
As of now, the comic book movies I want to watch are the DC films, because James Gunn seems to be knowing what he is doing, and DC is my favorite comic book franchise, and tied with Star Wars as my favorite franchise. Gunn will bring new life into the comic book movie genre with Superman Legacy, Lanterns, The Brave and the Bold, Swamp Thing, and many others in the future.
As for Marvel, while I will be watching their films, their TV shows, their tie-in specials, their comics, if they are not worth it, I am not paying attention to it.
This is not what we wanted from Marvel, and they gave it to us anyway. I have one last message to Marvel. FUCK. YOU!
That was a long one, so expect a big read.
It was alright but when are you going to review Puss in Boots 2 its been a month since it relaesed and i want to know your thoughts
I don’t even want to watch Kang Dynasty or Secret Wars if the Russo Brothers don’t work on them. Marvel Executives should see the box offices for Infinity War and Endgame and bring them back in!
4:11 KANG was in Loki on Disney plus... This is a Disney plus villain.
Kang is kinda like black adam, the more i see him the more i realize how bad he is
I have never seen such a horrific start to a phase before
The movie is now tied with Eternals as the worst reviewed MCU film ever, it barely broke even at the box office, and now they have to fire Majors after his abuse scandals. So now we lost their so called biggest threat yet
I’m just gonna say it outright. GOTG 3 and the rest of their lineup is gonna fail
Eric sometimes I haven't watched that yet but I'm gonna see it on Sunday
The movie was terrible i really miss infinity war and end game and iron man films 😢
Kang should've been saved so he can be the main villian of the
2025 fantastic 4 reboot movie that wouldeve made more sense considering he was Thier villain in the comics atleast Rama tut Kang he never even was Ant-Mans villians in the comics
If averages 5 has the same director as ant man 3 we are totally Fucked
Kang could've had his presence built like Thanos, but he would in in every movie he appeared in. But no gotcha you thought this movie had a Civil War tone. I bet Marvel is gunna gang bang the Director of Everything all at once with (woke) "IDEAS".
The Real villain isn't Kang...
DISNEY IS THE REAL VILLIAN!
And I think in new seasons of What If...? They should make an episode titled: What if Kang won?
Mickey: HAHA OH BOY
OH S###
Speaking of What If, Infinity Ultron is a way more terrifying and consistent villain than Kang. Just like The Lich from Adventure Time, Infinity Ultron’s motivation was always consistent: the destruction of all life in the Multiverse. Simple, but terrifying and effective. Not to mention, Infinity Ultron killed Variants of Iron Man, Hulk, Captain Marvel, Captain America, and Thanos, and almost killed Uatu. He’s arguably the most powerful being the MCU. It certainly doesn’t hurt that Infinity Ultron is voiced by Ross Marquand, a genuinely good actor. I’m sorry, but Jonathan Majors sucks as Kang. Like I said, Keith David would have been MUCH better as Kang, or even Javier Bardem.
What if: Mickey was the villain in avengers: secret wars?
Not only the Russos, they need Markus and McFeeley back.
They wrote the most iconic Marvel movies, but I think all four of them know better than to tie themselves to this creatively bankrupt steaming dung heap.
When I saw the ending where Scott thinks about what Kang said and then shrugs it off like it was nothing I’m like Eric Carter is going to dislike this because it’s typical MCU where whenever anything serious happens the MCU likes to make it a joke
Hi Eric. I'd really like to see you do compassion between Puss in Boots Vs Puss in Boots: The Last Wish
Yeahhhhh