Andras Schiff plays Schubert- 4 Impromtus op. 90 D 899

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @mehmetiksel3081
    @mehmetiksel3081 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    One of the most convincing impromptus among many. Magnificent Schubert who left us these unique pieces for eternity...

  • @popqueen77
    @popqueen77 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    What a thought-out flowing interpretation. I never found this piece interesting or beautiful, but hearing him play, I am inspired to practice to make it to a different level.

  • @fernandoosorio5707
    @fernandoosorio5707 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Divine Schubert. Thanks Andras.

  • @charlesdavis7087
    @charlesdavis7087 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Listening to Andras play these works is like writing the word "perfect" with golden ink.

    • @TheMightyFork_
      @TheMightyFork_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Charles Davis “the perfection itself is imperfection” - V.H

    • @kedimy
      @kedimy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did you notice the info posted in small letters (only if you look at the
      video on a desKtop; it does not show on phone)? The pianist is not
      Andras Schiff, but Paul Badura-Skoda.

    • @irinavassvetlova
      @irinavassvetlova 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are not right, Kedimy. Look with attention

    • @irinavassvetlova
      @irinavassvetlova 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Kedimy Push on No.1 in C minor. There you will hear Paul Badura Skoda

    • @robbyr9286
      @robbyr9286 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kedimy It appears to be an artifact of youtube's licensing/ attribution algorithm. Correct title, wrong recording?

  • @paulaventure2.021
    @paulaventure2.021 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Je n'ai jamais ressenti autant d'émotions en écoutant du Schubert, ce pianiste est incroyable !

  • @adrianachiodi3680
    @adrianachiodi3680 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Musica sublime, eseguita con amore e competenza straordinarie❗💕😇👏🫂💙

  • @mikewashington7386
    @mikewashington7386 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Michael...so much feelin ah Schubert so much life. he is with God today...gbless u Dr and Schubert and thevwoeks u gave us while u were shortly on earth...amen...mike nyc

  • @ArielHerzog
    @ArielHerzog 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Such a different interpretation of number 3 than Horowitz but both masterpieces and by incredible artists.

  • @marie-francehily8336
    @marie-francehily8336 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Du très grand Schubert ! MERCI.

  • @dic081211
    @dic081211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sono rimasto senza parole...!!!!

  • @metteholm4833
    @metteholm4833 ปีที่แล้ว

    I´d be prepared to give one year for work on no. 3 of these - and only that! My mother (may she rest in peace🥰) did it very well.

  • @patrickallen3390
    @patrickallen3390 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As Arial Herzog comments, No 3 performed convincingly , but differently, by Vladimir Horowitz. Nos 2, 3, & 4 are my top Schubert piano favourites, am currently struggling to perform # 4. Really brings home just how incredibly good these performances are by Maestro Andras, interpreted, I'm sure, precisely, no more, no less, as Schubert intended.

  • @Kalabresenfaenger
    @Kalabresenfaenger 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Inarrivabile.

  • @Sifsif__ma
    @Sifsif__ma 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I still think that maria pires is the one who gave the best interpretation to this piece of art

    • @quaver1239
      @quaver1239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All a matter of taste, isn’t it?

    • @poplife123
      @poplife123 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've not heard a more convincing interpretation than hers tbh....

  • @AB-vd8rt
    @AB-vd8rt 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Pires and Schiff. Both.

    • @Sifsif__ma
      @Sifsif__ma 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      pires is better , for me

    • @poplife123
      @poplife123 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Pires version of no.1 is unparalleled......awe inspiring......redefined the piece for me.....

  • @cordeliav3055
    @cordeliav3055 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bravo!

  • @quaver1239
    @quaver1239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The word is Impromptus.

  • @nessundorma44
    @nessundorma44 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Andras Schiff und Vladimir Horowitz, die genialsten Interpreten Schubertscher Klaviermusik!

  • @romahoffman4195
    @romahoffman4195 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @adamblock5141
    @adamblock5141 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What year was this recorded? ❤🎶

  • @kedimy
    @kedimy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The info says the pianist here is Paul Badura-Skoda (Austian artist, born 1927) and not Andras Schiff.

    • @irinavassvetlova
      @irinavassvetlova 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jinho Chung Its correktly!

    • @quaver1239
      @quaver1239 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No. At the top, in the info, it says András Schiff very clearly. Further down it tells us what we can get on TH-cam Premium, and those recordings include Paul Badura-Skoda.

  • @horiaganescu3948
    @horiaganescu3948 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Impromptus

  • @erzsebetkonda3213
    @erzsebetkonda3213 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ki lehet az a 14 személy, akinek ez a muzsika nem tetszik. Mert arra még gondolni sem akarok, hogy az előadásmóddal van bajuk! Az lehetetlen, mert az úgy tökéletes, ahogy van.

  • @olgashcherbakova8742
    @olgashcherbakova8742 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Спасибо

  • @davidperez6571
    @davidperez6571 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Although this is a perfect interpretation, I enjoy Grigory Sokolov’s interpretation better. It has more colours and nuances, for him every note is important, with Andras Schiff I do not get the same experience.

    • @ludwigvontutti3799
      @ludwigvontutti3799 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That’s exactly why I much prefer Schiff’s performance - I listen to Sokolov and I feel suffocated, he tries so hard to wring the profundity out of every note, and in the end I cannot understand the big picture of what the music is about. All I hear is Sokolov’s ideas, which may be interesting in isolation but what does it matter if the narrative of Schubert’s music is not brought out clearly? His pianism and musicianship are unquestionable and sometimes awe-inspiring but more often than not the heavy-handedness of his interpretations leaves me turning elsewhere.

    • @ganjamozart1435
      @ganjamozart1435 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree with you. I find Sokolov overly fussy at times. Relax 😂.

    • @quaver1239
      @quaver1239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ludwigvontutti : I agree with you. Thank you for putting it so well.

    • @Ernesto7608
      @Ernesto7608 ปีที่แล้ว

      Comparison between this interpretation and Sokolov's is not easy. Here we have only music, in Sokolov's videos we see him playing, his articulation, his facial expressions. I put some value in the latter, favoring Sokolov. But he also makes some unnecessary rubatos, and this version is cleaner, thus superior.

  • @TheAtheist22
    @TheAtheist22 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Horowitz is still the Best.