Teaching Arena Zoomers About STAX | Against the Odds | Historic Magic: the Gathering (MTG)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ม.ค. 2023
  • The Brothers' War unleashed several iconic Stax pieces on Magic Arena. Let's see how many we can stax up and teach some Arena zoomers what it's like to NOT be able to play Magic!
    Today's video is brought to you by Card Kingdom. You can pick up some MTG cards (and help support the show) at www.cardkingdom.com/mtggoldfish
    ► Read more about this deck (full article): www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/...
    ► View this deck with the latest prices: www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/5339...
    ◼ Purchase this deck (paper): mtg.fish/WLhBz
    ◼ Purchase this deck (Magic Online): mtg.fish/YMym1
    #MTG
    #MagicTheGathering
    #MagicArena
    #MTGHistoric
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 420

  • @augustusbrown4441
    @augustusbrown4441 ปีที่แล้ว +644

    Seth: "Emoting when your opponent is roping makes you looks bad"
    Crim: "I crowdsurf the Karn the moment I see the timer come up"

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  ปีที่แล้ว +244

      We have very different emote philosophies, lol

    • @starmanda88
      @starmanda88 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      C R O W D S U R F T H E K A R N

    • @gabrielcondon6895
      @gabrielcondon6895 ปีที่แล้ว

      People who rope don't deserve rights anyway 😂

    • @Tawnos_
      @Tawnos_ ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@MTGGoldfish I turned off emotes in beta and never looked back. It certainly makes the game less frustrating :)

    • @jcft1408
      @jcft1408 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@Tawnos_ skill issue

  • @joeyc6381
    @joeyc6381 ปีที่แล้ว +432

    you were right, the reason Heliod came back is because their devotion was only 4 without him on the board so he turns into a creature after he enters

    • @kingnapikkingoficeland7856
      @kingnapikkingoficeland7856 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      so, cause he's an enchantment before being a creature?

    • @OsvaldoChannel1
      @OsvaldoChannel1 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      @@kingnapikkingoficeland7856 yes. He enters as not a creature, then as he enters he sees that devotion is 5 and then becomes a creature

    • @OGNoNameNobody
      @OGNoNameNobody ปีที่แล้ว +8

      This Answer is Correct.

    • @dementievatz
      @dementievatz ปีที่แล้ว +37

      It’s weird, because Containment Priest is a replacement ability “if a creature would enter the battlefield.” Heliod looks ahead and sees that it won’t be a creature because there isn’t enough devotion on the board, so it enters, but it enters as a creature because of its own devotion. I read about this interaction when planning to use Containment Priest as a sideboard card against Xenagos/Worldspine Wurm/Indomitable Creativity decks. It’s weird and unintuitive, but it’s how it works.

    • @jaxsonbateman
      @jaxsonbateman ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@kingnapikkingoficeland7856 That's not quite it. It's because he has an ability that 'shuts off' him being a creature if the devotion isn't high enough - which is the case while he's not on the battlefield.
      Because it's a replacement effect that affects how the card enters the battlefield, it needs to be a creature as its entering (which it isn't, because of the lack of devotion). If it were, instead, a triggered ability that triggered when a creature entered the battlefield that wasn't cast, it would work, as triggered abilities look at permanents as they exist when they enter (so, for example, in this case Heliod would trigger a card like Soul Warden because her triggered ability sees that a creature entered the battlefield).
      Basically, replacement effects can be confusing. :P

  • @VRanger100
    @VRanger100 ปีที่แล้ว +294

    Seth: Today we're going to prevent our opponents from playing Magic on Arena.
    MTGA Economy: Hey that's my job.

    • @Linky609
      @Linky609 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      This would be more funny if it weren't so damn accurate haha.

    • @ashdog9235
      @ashdog9235 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Funnily enough I want to build stax but is like over 50 rares 😬

    • @alejandrorivas4585
      @alejandrorivas4585 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ashdog9235that'll be 50 dollars k thx

    • @recusantvessel
      @recusantvessel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alejandrorivas4585try $125 :))))

  • @bryantan4228
    @bryantan4228 ปีที่แล้ว +634

    New sub series of Against the Odds called "Teaching Arena Zoomers"? This is a sequel to Teaching Arena Zoomers About Hard Locks and Chalice

    • @ciaran.downey
      @ciaran.downey ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Yes please, these are some of my fave videos

    • @brighty-go6nn
      @brighty-go6nn ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Are there actually that many people who started mtg with arena, I know I am one of those but sometimes it feels that I’m alone in that

    • @TheDylls
      @TheDylls ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Having started with Naya Burn in modern back in the day, I saw Naya Zoo has been doing well recently and I'm kinda stoked lol

    • @ConManAU
      @ConManAU ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I first played Magic a long time ago (back when mana burn was still a thing) but I quit for many years and only came back recently via Arena. So I’m not technically a Zoomer but I did miss a lot of these classic(?) deck archetypes.

    • @spumy_plughole1191
      @spumy_plughole1191 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@brighty-go6nn I'm an arena zoomer lol

  • @Collisto2435
    @Collisto2435 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    “You know crim would be crowd surfing karn”
    God yes I know he would

  • @kaydenbarney2941
    @kaydenbarney2941 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    I absolutely love Seth clicking the smiley face on the did you have fun screen

    • @runescapewarrior66
      @runescapewarrior66 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      "I would click it twice if I could" Is my favorite part

  • @Volttikoira
    @Volttikoira ปีที่แล้ว +101

    Mtggoldfish might be my favourite educational channel. Teaching new players all the important life lessons.

  • @Modest7787
    @Modest7787 ปีที่แล้ว +126

    I love Seth educating arena zoomers about early magic.

  • @abe_5536
    @abe_5536 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Containment priest/displacer loops against elves was so gross, I love it 😂

    • @harune8476
      @harune8476 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeap. Totally thought game 1 was a fluke, then they got wrecked worse in game 2 by the same setup.

  • @LadyMapi
    @LadyMapi ปีที่แล้ว +20

    When I first saw the video length, I legitimately thought you only played 2-3 games. Turns out that I underestimated Arena players.
    The match vs. Elves was one of the most beautiful things I've seen in a while.

  • @50mm_
    @50mm_ ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Favorite moment: Following the one land, one keep defeat, Seth shrugs and says, "It's just one of those things. There's nothing we could have done. Nothing we could have done differently at all. The Magic Gods just didn't want us to win."

  • @kevinwonnacott5150
    @kevinwonnacott5150 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    "I would click this twice if I could" was gold.

  • @arken2903
    @arken2903 ปีที่แล้ว +126

    Watching Seth play, joke and give his opinion is magical, it's like having a Dumbledore showing you how Magic works

  • @TheDylls
    @TheDylls ปีที่แล้ว +45

    "How does your deck win?"
    You decide to concede.
    "No, I mean what's the wincon?"
    Destroying your will to continue

  • @Henzoid
    @Henzoid ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Seth, I was 100% sure you were correct about that Heliod re-entry being an arena bug so I did some digging. And it turns out, nope.
    “As a God enters the battlefield, your devotion to its color will determine whether any replacement effects that affect creatures entering the battlefield apply to that God. Because replacement effects are considered before the God is on the battlefield, the mana symbols in its mana cost won’t be counted when determining this.”

    • @jamespeckham4089
      @jamespeckham4089 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      all those devotion requirements are static , in play, ABILITIES. its still a CREATURE CARD. anywhere but on the battlefield they are still technically creatures. if you remove all abilities from a god card the devotion thing no longer applies

  • @DonovanPresents
    @DonovanPresents ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I love how the one deck to beat old school magic was an old school magic deck itself 😂
    Also, the last game with lifegain:
    Drannith Magistrate shuts down Disturb creatures as well!

  • @williambosma8726
    @williambosma8726 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    This warms my heart seeing all the stax ❤️

  • @Lemony711
    @Lemony711 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Seeing Stax work on arena makes me immeasurably happy.

    • @angrybellsprout
      @angrybellsprout ปีที่แล้ว

      Not sure what this has to do with smokestack. Feels more like taxes...

    • @valorantfaded
      @valorantfaded 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Stax is a term referring to cards that restrict the ability to play the game. Smokestack was the first one. Tax cards are stax pieces.

    • @chasebethersonton5169
      @chasebethersonton5169 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Smokestack made people sac permanents, so I consider that to be stax. Maybe we need a "Stax and Tax"

  • @panko2848
    @panko2848 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    36:03 so i looked this up, apparently because Heliod only becomes a creature due to its OWN white pip giving enough devotion it avoids the Containment Priests effect, since upon entering it is considered an enchantment, and then immediately afterwards checks devotion count and becomes a creature. if the opponent had one more white pip on the board Heliod would have been exiled since it would have entered as a creature i believe.
    EDIT: should have watched a bit further, you immediately assumed the correct reason lol

  • @SpinAroundU
    @SpinAroundU ปีที่แล้ว +25

    As I explained stax (even thought without the actual stax I'd argue it's more like D&T) once to a newbie friend : "Stax is breaking your legs in order to break your opponent's, except *you* can actually win with broken legs."

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Haha, this is a perfect description.

    • @wesleywyndam-pryce5305
      @wesleywyndam-pryce5305 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I like to use doom foretold as a stand in for smoke stax.

    • @nathanielreichley4640
      @nathanielreichley4640 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@wesleywyndam-pryce5305Nice that's a good point!

  • @japanime313
    @japanime313 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'm glad I can rely on you to teach the ways of old to these zoomers🤣

  • @WushuTaz
    @WushuTaz ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Gotta love that evil stax laugh that only a fun game of stax can provide.

  • @XxKyle318xX
    @XxKyle318xX ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Strict proctor was incredible in this. It’s a card I’ve seriously overlooked because I felt like everytime it hit the field it was doing work

  • @Majdjejsneei4
    @Majdjejsneei4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I cant believe how many salty ropes and instant scoops you got, that was filthy

  • @kristeenlivesay2664
    @kristeenlivesay2664 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love these ones, learning about these kinds of decks is almost a right of passage for MTG players.

  • @redstonepro5412
    @redstonepro5412 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i am very glad that you do such educational content also for your opponents

  • @bobklaasen5358
    @bobklaasen5358 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That was some insanely lucky draws against that elves deck.
    And containment priest + displacer is not a combo I would have thought of but its really fun to see.

  • @adamtobiasz8793
    @adamtobiasz8793 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great video brother Set. I really enjoyed seeing people scoop up to you.

  • @HeruCSGO
    @HeruCSGO ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got the mutavault + book of exalted deeds combo off right before I was gonna lose, so the dude played it out until my only permanent left in play was mutavault from an ultimate, then when he had no cards left they used all their timeouts. Truely the best game of magic I’ve played.

  • @Soulus101
    @Soulus101 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been trying to build this deck for ages! Thanks for this!

  • @theyonlycomeoutwhenitsquiet
    @theyonlycomeoutwhenitsquiet ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This deck gives me such Teferi/Knowledge Pool vibes... so happy!!!

  • @Jackson666fan
    @Jackson666fan ปีที่แล้ว +6

    loving the historic content!

  • @HiggzWasHere
    @HiggzWasHere ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Opponent: gets mana starved
    Seth: Yeah that was a good one!

  • @toolittletoolate
    @toolittletoolate 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ah fantastic, I thought you might have done this already but I look forward to this

  • @Axelf83
    @Axelf83 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I loved this educational video so much!

  • @theetiologist9539
    @theetiologist9539 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This has to be one of the best intros ever. I fricking love it.

  • @Netro1992
    @Netro1992 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Making zoomer squirm with old archetypes is always fun.

  • @matiasc003
    @matiasc003 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "We stax away their will to play magic, we got them" LOVED IT!

  • @Qub3rs
    @Qub3rs ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Stax... my mortal enemy... My hatred for Stax is infinite... Only entertaining when I'm not the opponent...

  • @seanclark4071
    @seanclark4071 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When you played prison, I commented on the fact that that style of deck really preys on the historic meta. It seems this remains true

  • @ben_clifford
    @ben_clifford ปีที่แล้ว

    4:10 That intro got me PUMPED UP. I can't wait to see how things turn out.

  • @alexleblanc6364
    @alexleblanc6364 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can we get a full stream of this Seth?! It was so much fun to watch

  • @Spotifist
    @Spotifist ปีที่แล้ว

    Exciting deck, thanks for the video!

  • @YepNah
    @YepNah 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Genuinely seems like a pretty sweet deck. Loved this episode.

  • @justinwhite9353
    @justinwhite9353 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video was extremely satisfying to sit through 😂

  • @fish_in_distress
    @fish_in_distress ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got into MTG by playing Legacy basically by accident because I didn't know any better, so these videos really take me back lmao

  • @harune8476
    @harune8476 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing seth! love the Arena zoomers videos. I only hope that we one day get the cards to teach Arena zoomers about lantern control.

  • @SpellingBeeWiner
    @SpellingBeeWiner ปีที่แล้ว

    Keeping a 1 lander lol. That was so painful to watch. Everything else was amazing, totally love the deck. I need to try this!

  • @nathanwrennmn
    @nathanwrennmn ปีที่แล้ว

    Some wholesome content. The world needs more of this.

  • @seleenshadowpaw3012
    @seleenshadowpaw3012 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you are already doing arena exhibitions, i'd like to ask that you include the wildcard costs of the deck in the cost preview maybe?
    Knowing how much the deck costs in paper or tix kinda does jack in this instance. And it at least gives you a feeling of what you'd need to craft it yourself.

  • @izzyv830
    @izzyv830 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    as an arena zoomer i gotta say this deck looks incredibly sweeeet. plus anything that dunks on control has my approval

  • @brycerathsack7885
    @brycerathsack7885 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the wholesome content I subbed for.

  • @mrsnufflegums
    @mrsnufflegums ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Arena zoomers really need to understand the hell that is a lock-out stax list. They just don't get how brutal it can be to play against.

  • @apocpon1944
    @apocpon1944 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Did you have fun in that match?" God, what a perfect time for Arena to ask lmao

  • @Gitah92
    @Gitah92 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damn, just looking at the deck tech RN. But wow, this is a masterpiece.

  • @nonsuperimposable
    @nonsuperimposable ปีที่แล้ว

    I could watch this deck for hours 😍

  • @bryankopkin6869
    @bryankopkin6869 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “Opponent is on brand. I wonder if they are actually an elf.” - Seth, probably better known as “Saffron Olive”

  • @MesivYT
    @MesivYT ปีที่แล้ว +2

    36:20 Heliod is the 5th devotion, so it’s not a creature until Heliod enters

  • @ngbrother
    @ngbrother ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This deck was legit. Very cohesive. In terms of game play, there were a couple times when you cast combat tricks at sorcery speed. 😅

  • @stonerainproductions
    @stonerainproductions ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I wish we had a Smoke Stack so we could complete the experience! Great video!

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too :(

    • @47Mortuus
      @47Mortuus ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MTGGoldfish would be a completely different deck

  • @davidmorales-dm7xm
    @davidmorales-dm7xm ปีที่แล้ว

    First time showing us the survey, this was a monumental moment in Against the Odds.

  • @agrape2887
    @agrape2887 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Watching elfball scoop to a displacer is great

  • @jjanderson12001
    @jjanderson12001 ปีที่แล้ว

    Makes me giddy when you’re “teaching Zoomers” videos come out nothing sweeter!! Thanks Seth you’re the best

  • @KunouNoHana
    @KunouNoHana ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So the Heliod thing is, as you guessed, because they had exact devotion. By removing it you lowered their devotion so it wasn't a creature, then when it came back it's mana symbol gave them devotion again so it became a creature AFTER containment priest had already checked it.

  • @souocesar
    @souocesar ปีที่แล้ว

    This reminds me the good ol days of locking fool with pool and teferi. Oh please revisit the good old lock decks. :)

  • @TheAndyDish
    @TheAndyDish ปีที่แล้ว +7

    People hate on stax, then they can't do anything about it. Funny how that happens!

  • @camj1758
    @camj1758 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful stuff

  • @colinrobinson4464
    @colinrobinson4464 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Super interesting to watch you play Stax in historic after only ever heard of Stax as a commander boogeyman. With certain strategies like this, I do think it would be interesting to hear you talk about how to counter some of the strategies that you play in ATO. I know the answer might be "Opponent just needs to play magic" haha but would still be interested to hear. And not what deck I should play to counter it, more like "if you're playing tempo and encounter this in the wild, what should you do?"

    • @wesleywyndam-pryce5305
      @wesleywyndam-pryce5305 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm a stax player, its very dependent on what deck you are.
      its all about the long game though unless you're aggro and can go under.

  • @anthonycastaneda1331
    @anthonycastaneda1331 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd really love a tshirt with "Sweet, Sweet" as part of it!

  • @IanWeaver
    @IanWeaver ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh my god I love Stax. I have to build this deck now.

  • @alecolson1501
    @alecolson1501 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah man, Strict Proctor is an extremely good card. I remember pulling one right when STX came out and it was such a fun card to see people experience for the first time lol

  • @AndrewSlee9
    @AndrewSlee9 ปีที่แล้ว

    that elf matchup went perfectly lmao insane

  • @dakodastevens8972
    @dakodastevens8972 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I honestly don't think keeping that 1 lander was a mistake. Risky, but when you are in a bad match up, you often have to take risks or gets a little lucky to win. You needed 1 land out of your top 2 maybe 3 cards, that's a pretty high chance, your chances of getting an above average draw if you mulled to 6 was probably lower than that. In general I am more willing to either keep risky hands or mulligan hands that are a little below average in bad match ups.

  • @jjjbowen221
    @jjjbowen221 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "Stax" comes from the card "smokestack" from Urza's Saga, one of the original pieces.

  • @disafear3674
    @disafear3674 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was fun!

  • @adizzle625
    @adizzle625 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video made me so happy. Take them to class Seth!

  • @Miluric
    @Miluric ปีที่แล้ว

    With all the value packed into creatures nowadays, ETB hate cards really saved the match-up. I recognized it even back in Ixalan with Tocatli Honor Guard. Way to show it to the Arena Zoomers!

  • @MasterCrvo
    @MasterCrvo ปีที่แล้ว

    So funny...I worked on a version of thus deck all night last night, using stone rain as well. Soooooo fun

    • @MasterCrvo
      @MasterCrvo ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm really excited to incorporate some of these ideas, too. Thanks for your work!!

  • @Awesomesausages
    @Awesomesausages ปีที่แล้ว

    I could watch a couple videos of Seth playing stax every day and be happy.

  • @matthewnesgoda2498
    @matthewnesgoda2498 ปีที่แล้ว

    I ran UW control in Strixhaven standard and Strict Proctor won me almost every game it landed. It killed lands, life gain, elves, and a lot more. Nobody expected it since nobody played it and it was a total bomb.

  • @davidcrawford5324
    @davidcrawford5324 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Granted I'm a year late to the party, but I thought I'd put in my 2 cents on this deck. I think it's great, and I have a suggestion on something to add if you can avoid using instants unless it's your turn. Defense Grid makes all spells cost a whopping 3 more when it's not your turn, thus making control and burn decks MUCH harder to play if you can keep it on the table, and tbh control decks are most likely one of the few that can shut this one down if they manage to get the lands out on every turn and have the right color mana to cast the spells needed to do so.
    In addition there are a couple of enchantments that can be used as well. Aura of Silence and if you are willing to splash a bit of blue in, Monastery Siege. The first one makes all Artifact and Enchantment spells cost 2 more for your opponents, and you can sacrifice it to get rid of a really nasty Artifact or Enchantment causing you problems that is already in play. The second one lets you either draw an extra card every turn but then discard a card...OR, you can make all spells that target you or a permanent you control cost 2 more.
    There's also a white enchantment called Ghostly Prison that makes your opponent pay 2 mana for each creature they want to attack you with. There's a blue enchantment that does the exact same thing called Propaganda so you can have one of each in Commander decks thus getting around the 1x only rule.
    There's also a blue Planeswalker that makes opponents' spells that target your creatures or Planeswalkers cost an additional 2 mana as well. This deck can greatly benefit by going from a mono white deck to a UW deck due to the blue cards I mentioned that have good synergy with the theme, as well as having the added benefit of being able to run counter-spells if desired to keep your combo pieces around long enough to get them all in place and lock your opponent down.

  • @moox100
    @moox100 ปีที่แล้ว

    that elves matchup was brutal it was like you kicked a puppy

  • @PKAnon
    @PKAnon ปีที่แล้ว

    This was therapeutic

  • @IAmebAdger
    @IAmebAdger ปีที่แล้ว

    That's some good educating right there

  • @chaosgaming2447
    @chaosgaming2447 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice Vid love this!

  • @mymusic2403
    @mymusic2403 ปีที่แล้ว

    "I wonder if they're actually an elf" that part actually killed me LOL

  • @XanosKnyghtshade
    @XanosKnyghtshade ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't know the Lotus Field combo, that's goin in my Stax deck

  • @matthewbell4897
    @matthewbell4897 ปีที่แล้ว

    That elves match was brutal. Absolute massacre

  • @Atmapalazzo
    @Atmapalazzo ปีที่แล้ว

    31:32 HE FINALLY FIGURED IT OUT! ITS A MIRACLE!

  • @simic0racle157
    @simic0racle157 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have a stax historic brawl deck based on using role reversal to give away codie, the dck runs alot of 4 manna nonpermant spells and role reversal is the only one at 3 mana or less.

  • @claycook-mowery1416
    @claycook-mowery1416 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My first 10 games with this deck, my opponents apparently had about 4 non-creature cards in their deck. Ninjas, goblins, red-green stompy, elves. Literally the only 2 games I won were against artifact-only decks.

  • @Superfarts
    @Superfarts ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Vince, get in here

  • @mobmango4
    @mobmango4 ปีที่แล้ว

    They're definitely gathering data on Karn/Nykthos and Rakdos decks. I'm getting those surveys almost exclusively in those matches. When I added Karn to my deck they pop up every couple matches now

  • @senken12
    @senken12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Strict Procter has a good amount of relevant text on it in... all formats? It just takes some build-around to make sure you're not treading on your own toes

  • @Sean-bq9bm
    @Sean-bq9bm ปีที่แล้ว

    I don’t see a single doom foretold which follows more with the smokestack theme which is where the term stax came from

  • @RedemptionExplained
    @RedemptionExplained 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    question - do only best of 3 queues let you choose if you want to go first?
    lots of draft games I would prefer to go 2nd but it seems decided by coinflip and I cant choose.

  • @josueantonio12
    @josueantonio12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would totally craft this decklist if I had the wildcards. Salty scoops were the best...

  • @Zaqzorn
    @Zaqzorn 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Heliod thing would work if off his devotion was greater than 5 when Heliod re enters. when it was removed it became drops 4 and it becomes a regular enchantment meaning containment priest doesn’t effect it

  • @ashdog9235
    @ashdog9235 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really want to build a version of this seems so fun

  • @weirddan455
    @weirddan455 ปีที่แล้ว

    28:00 The correct response there was "Good lord"