36 Wraths | Against the Odds

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 824

  • @dtthire
    @dtthire 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2101

    The second game might just be one of the most glorious things I’ve ever witnessed. Watching the domain deck have an Atraxa every turn for like 10 turns in a row and still lose is unbelievably therapeutic. This. This is content.

    • @mindhackz
      @mindhackz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +107

      Love watching netdecks get whomped

    • @ilyafoskin
      @ilyafoskin 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      I realised while watching that my Atraxa domain deck would win easily were I playing against this boardwipe.deck. This is because I play several copies of Bitter Reunion in my version as early game card filtering and to give the 3/3 Beast tokens or Atraxa haste in the late game for a quick finish. Without the potential to put lethal on board in one turn and give it haste, any slow creature deck has a terrible time against this.

    • @howtonotplayminecraft950
      @howtonotplayminecraft950 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +203

      I think it'll be hilarious when people start playing this because they saw Seth play it, only to create the most uneventful mirror match in the history of standard

    • @LegitHarpyHunter
      @LegitHarpyHunter 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I wish you had put a timestamp...

    • @dtthire
      @dtthire 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      @wearywastrel It starts at 7:39 and provides you 15 minutes of free therapy

  • @BlankeeStarcraft
    @BlankeeStarcraft 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1163

    The hilarious part is picturing his aggro opponents thinking, “damn, how the hell is this guy so lucky with drawing those wraths?”

    • @Crunchatize_Me_Senpai
      @Crunchatize_Me_Senpai 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +206

      That second game though. God I wish I could have been in the opponent’s presence for that, just to see them go from thinking “Wow he’s sure drawn a lot of wraths” to “Oh my god he’s literally only playing wraths.” Wonder how long it took them to realize lol

    • @jonathonabel1548
      @jonathonabel1548 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      My exact thought 😂 I wish I could have seen the guys reaction when he realized

    • @tylerblalack6684
      @tylerblalack6684 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​the very last card in gis deck lol@@Crunchatize_Me_Senpai

  • @VRanger100
    @VRanger100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1188

    Opponents: What's the wincon?
    Seth: Your sanity

    • @Mercra
      @Mercra 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      Raw. Unadulterated. Sodium.

    • @Tawnos_
      @Tawnos_ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Seth is channeling Crim in his enjoyment of this deck

    • @Shimatzu95
      @Shimatzu95 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Just throwing it out there: we COULD introduce sanity- or more fittingly madness-counters as an alternative to poison.

    • @Crunchatize_Me_Senpai
      @Crunchatize_Me_Senpai 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Lol literally, opponent drew so many cards they milled themselves out, and the flavor explanation of milling is whittling away the opponent’s sanity.

    • @josephrion3514
      @josephrion3514 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Came to say this. Milling out is losing your sanity. ​@@Crunchatize_Me_Senpai

  • @Brentman89
    @Brentman89 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +754

    Sometimes I play one Counterspell and my opponent scoops, that player that sat through 15 plus board wipes showed off the iron will lol

    • @kats7930
      @kats7930 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Seriously it's kind of sad when people salty scoop a single counter... 😮

    • @psymar
      @psymar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@kats7930I had someone in mtgo legacy who scooped to a single burning ritual

    • @SonnigesDeutschland
      @SonnigesDeutschland 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

      @@kats7930 it's not always salty. sometimes you keep a sketchy hand that relies on that one early spell to resolve, and then a counter is just swift death.

    • @kats7930
      @kats7930 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@SonnigesDeutschland Unless it's game 2, your clock has run down, and you are trying to save clock for game 3, or unless opponent is durdling, there's not really an excuse to fold to counter. Either they KO u quick or they don't and you have time to recover. It's not like seeing 2 more turns is going to break you, y'know?

    • @MsMiDC
      @MsMiDC 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@kats7930 Sometimes you keep a hand thats shoddy. Sometimes your hand gets unclogged by some card and then countering it is just game right there. No reason to play it out. Not always salt, but funny to think so anyway lol.

  • @TheLoneAlpaca
    @TheLoneAlpaca 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +764

    Seth is so cheery for someone who likes making the most sinister decks

    • @TheGrifcannon22
      @TheGrifcannon22 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      He gets all the evil out in game so he can be happy in life.

    • @Xoulrath_
      @Xoulrath_ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Apparently you haven't seen the dozens of shitty decks that Seth has made.

    • @MetalHev
      @MetalHev 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This isn't even that bad. CGB has a bant control list that is pretty much the most evil you can get in current standard.

    • @marsrocks247
      @marsrocks247 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      He is able to project all his degenerate spite playing onto Crim and just hates on Crim instead of acknowledging he is the problematic player at the table.
      Oh wait, Phil is on this season... STOP THE AGENT OF TREACHERY LOOP OH GOD OH NO.

    • @DrakeNAllen
      @DrakeNAllen 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Seth while committing literal war crimes: 😄

  • @bensteinhauser784
    @bensteinhauser784 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +605

    Never expected Seth to make an OnlyWraths

    • @Jay-zt1pq
      @Jay-zt1pq 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      😳👀🥵

    • @durandle9226
      @durandle9226 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      reign of wrath

    • @Mariotorres808
      @Mariotorres808 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Onlywarths is a good name for this deck

    • @IILiamHD
      @IILiamHD 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      onlywraths is hilarious 😂

    • @kevingeorge5159
      @kevingeorge5159 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      who subscribes your onlywraths?
      seth: i mostly bank on domain

  • @sammather8295
    @sammather8295 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +305

    I bet that second game the opponent was sitting there going “I played my Atraxa, why hasn’t he scooped yet? I’m casting 7 mana bombs and haven’t won yet, I’ve never got this far. I have an Atraxa EVERY turn, just scoop you fool!”.

  • @Loren_Law
    @Loren_Law 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +195

    This is a perfect video to show someone who doesn't understand why best of one is not the same world as best of three

    • @stefanravalli6940
      @stefanravalli6940 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Totes, I feel like those are when they playtest the "haha gotcha!" decks and then scamper away before opponents have a chance to sideboard around them. Question is though: if they took this to best-of-3, how do opponents sideboard around it?

    • @Scotch20
      @Scotch20 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@stefanravalli6940 Haste, counterspells, burn, some combos could work. Also any wincon that isn't a creature.

    • @stefanravalli6940
      @stefanravalli6940 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Those are theoretical archetypes/tech that could beat it, but are those kinds of cards significantly found in sideboards?

    • @lukasloetscher1037
      @lukasloetscher1037 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well most planeswalker will win against this deck?
      There is only one wrath that kills planeswalkers, so atopping the plneswalkers drom ulting is not really possible.

  • @Modest7787
    @Modest7787 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +360

    That feeling wondering if your opponent drew the boardwipe.
    Seth: Haha fool.

    • @matthewsanchez7953
      @matthewsanchez7953 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      OPPONENT: Now might be a really good time for you to board wipe...
      SETH: That's my secret Cap; I always board wipe.

    • @Romashka_Sov
      @Romashka_Sov 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What do you mean "if"?

  • @justwantawholename
    @justwantawholename 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +113

    Imagine the mirror match up. Two people just awkwardly staring at each other while making land drops

    • @cousinpatsey2471
      @cousinpatsey2471 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Funny enough, the mirror is determined by who is able to reliably activate their man lands/Mirrex earlier. Neither deck has any way of making a come back against itself, despite being made entirely of cards meant to enable a deck to come back.

    • @Funkytrip73
      @Funkytrip73 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ...and attacking each other with mites that can't block :D

    • @Ash16180
      @Ash16180 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Funkytrip73 The mites are useless. What's the plan, making mites and hope the opponent doesn't have a wrath?

    • @Funkytrip73
      @Funkytrip73 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@Ash16180 it is the only wincon basically besides the mill, so you make a mite end of turn and attack the other. Then the other does the same and in the mean time every turn a wrath kills all the mites in play...

    • @xchronox0
      @xchronox0 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      With the current deck as is, I think the player on the draw loses, because they'll draw their final card first. Firing up creature lands just gets them killed by wraths. You couldn't do enough damage with them to win by damage. There's too much life gain.

  • @MrShinyObject
    @MrShinyObject 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +176

    Seth, you have no idea how much I needed this. It feels like it's been a while since we've had a real, actual, dumb against the odds. It's wonderful.

  • @remigusker6024
    @remigusker6024 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +125

    I remember reading a comment recently that was something to the effect of, "growing up is realizing Seth was the real bad guy all along, Crim just wants to play grixis" or something like that.
    It's the truth

  • @stonerainproductions
    @stonerainproductions 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    "We only have 6 Wraths left,".
    -Seth
    😂

  • @matthewjennings7645
    @matthewjennings7645 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +123

    I hope this deck makes a presence at a tournament so that Seth is the blame for ruining Standard

    • @machinronii
      @machinronii 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      I for one will be using this in my next FNM

    • @jamesrule1338
      @jamesrule1338 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Hasbro/Wizards ruined Standard. Seth is just demonstrating what was done.

    • @Romashka_Sov
      @Romashka_Sov 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@machinroniitell us how it went

    • @arieltkotz4877
      @arieltkotz4877 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So far, all Seth's videos i saw would ruin a tournment if they made an appearance... Turbo fog was the worse though because i've seen it in the wild...

  • @EveHawthorne
    @EveHawthorne 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +264

    You need to cut down on the Mishra's Foundries. With a deck full of double colored pips, the density of colorless lands you have is way too high. I think one or two is plenty, and then you can rely mostly on your Mirrexes and Restless Fortresses.
    Otherwise, aside from the colored mana issues, this deck is absolutely bonkers in how well it does

    • @_Ve_98
      @_Ve_98 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      Yup. Also, the deck doesn't win with direct damage. It's either poison, mill or concession. There's fortress is worth it because it's a good blocker and a way to gain life plus a dual land.

    • @wigglepants
      @wigglepants 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      100%, the foundries never seemed relevant in these games even.

    • @moralessanchezoscarelias6412
      @moralessanchezoscarelias6412 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's great to see opponents scoop rather than slowly die to little beats from creature lands 😂

    • @jrjamesson
      @jrjamesson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah came here to say the same thing

    • @TheWebfootedfreak
      @TheWebfootedfreak 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      That was my thought too. Foundry was very rarely relevant. It would’ve been better as a basic in most of those games.

  • @VictorianoOchoa
    @VictorianoOchoa 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +292

    Seth is officially my MTG hero. From teaching Stax to Necropotence to board wipe tribal. Nay, my savior.

    • @Aaron-kq5kk
      @Aaron-kq5kk 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Board wipe kindred*

    • @nyxknight7555
      @nyxknight7555 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lol nay 😂😂😂

    • @SiegfriedDrachentoeter
      @SiegfriedDrachentoeter 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@Aaron-kq5kk That shit outta here.

  • @BurakBoraKapan
    @BurakBoraKapan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    Seth calling "Kumano Faces Kakkazan" just "Faces" because that's the easiest word to pronounce is sending me

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      lol, actually that's true

  • @Stratic1357
    @Stratic1357 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +148

    Turbo-wrath probably more infuriating than turbo-fog.

    • @davidmitchell621
      @davidmitchell621 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Having nothing on the board and doing nothing versus having something on the board and doing nothing

    • @Jawzah
      @Jawzah 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well - wraths are mostly not instant speed so at lest you can do some damage with haste.. If you don't play haste - then probably yes... Fog is also cheaper so turbo fog may be playing more card draw.. Oh yes - I do play deep cavern bats - so turbo wrath might be even worse.. Also of course some creatures don't care that much about fog -- and on the other hand something like incubator tokens can get around (most) wraths but not fog. Why not play turbo-fogwrath?

  • @laurentrobitaille2204
    @laurentrobitaille2204 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

    It’s so wholesome to see Seth happily wrathing away his opponents’ will to play Magic.

  • @vividsyntax5301
    @vividsyntax5301 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

    Seth, this is utterly *perverse,* and I absolutely love you for it.

  • @jamesgambardella6401
    @jamesgambardella6401 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Watching Domain get 17 wraths is the best thing I've ever seen

  • @nikovan12
    @nikovan12 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    "I am not a jerk I swear"
    "Here's a Farewell on all modes after Sylex as a flex"
    😂😂😂

    • @Smutter86
      @Smutter86 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I was thinking that he was gonna use regular wraths until the opponent's final card and then Farewell to really rub it in XD So great!!

  • @SilverWolf340
    @SilverWolf340 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    I’d like to imagine that second opponent just seething, hoping you’d miss one eventually. But whether it was their stubbornness or their sense of humor that kept them from scooping, I’m so glad they didn’t, it made for one of my favorite magic games ever.
    Interestingly, Seth played in pretty much every other magic game in that list of favorites, what a guy.

    • @StarshadowMelody
      @StarshadowMelody 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Seething? More like Sething, lmao.

  • @davismccardle1
    @davismccardle1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    29:45 "Atraxa doesn't really matter too much" - MTG ARena quote of the century

  • @swampybwoy
    @swampybwoy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    Best standard against the odds ever. This was glorious, hilarious, and a little nefarious.

  • @fundude365
    @fundude365 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Opponent no. 2: "They _have_ to run out of wraths eventually!"

    • @RoxyGotMoxy.
      @RoxyGotMoxy. 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I used to run (YEARS ago) a mono blue deck whose entire wincon was to ult OG Tamiyo, drop Omniscience, and then Cryptic Command everything you play until you concede or deck out. It was 4 of each of those 3 cards, 3 Vedalken Shackles, 25 lands, 2 Ratchet Bombs, 2 Elixir of Immortality, and the rest was literally just all Remands and various era-competative counterspells. People got MAD lmao.

    • @OriginalUnjustifier
      @OriginalUnjustifier 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Narrator: _They did not run out of wraths._

  • @samuelgardner2653
    @samuelgardner2653 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    I need a custom emote that just says, "Blame Saffron Olive" for when I play this deck

    • @remigusker6024
      @remigusker6024 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I'd use that quite a bit. XD

  • @mrpoparq
    @mrpoparq 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    read that as wraiths and thought this was a goofy nazgul deck, not a war crime!

    • @thecrazycapn
      @thecrazycapn 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Me too, friend.

    • @syrusalder7795
      @syrusalder7795 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      same

    • @xMareZx
      @xMareZx 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same haha

  • @nathanjohnson5088
    @nathanjohnson5088 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Seth cackling saying "it worked" is giving me some dr Frankenstein vibes lol. What horror hath he unleashed on the world!

    • @AricHaldan0782
      @AricHaldan0782 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      next standard against the odds; "Oh no, opponent is playing the wrath deck !"

    • @_Ve_98
      @_Ve_98 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He was too fixated on if he could do it he didn't bother to think if he should.

    • @w4lk4
      @w4lk4 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I built this terrible thing. I was a few off so Liliana and Wandering Emperor went in for spot removal. So much fun

  • @aidanbagshaw3411
    @aidanbagshaw3411 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    Another wrath that is also a threat is the wanderer from ONE.

  • @tylerbennett4348
    @tylerbennett4348 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Using sylex to bait the opponent's last binding only to farewell it all... what a masterful chain of events

    • @MetalHev
      @MetalHev 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      He didn't bait the binding. The opponent can only bind the sylex once they get priority, and they only got it once Farewell went on the stack. He and Seth were just fooling around since the game was already over.

    • @xchronox0
      @xchronox0 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Opponent was being nice, letting Seth get his Sylex back because surely exiling your Sylex to Farewell right after you play it is an accident. The most honorable opponent.

  • @stormblest
    @stormblest 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    This is by FAR my favorite standard video done on this channel. Sooooo funny.

  • @EmperorNapoleon1815
    @EmperorNapoleon1815 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Now this, THIS, is Magic as Garfield intended.

  • @RoxyGotMoxy.
    @RoxyGotMoxy. 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Making "Farewell" be literally the last card your opponent sees game 2 (both in name and in wiping their everything) is the most sadistically delicious thing i've seen in a while. Bravo Seth.

  • @1000FeatheredOwl
    @1000FeatheredOwl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    So at what point did his opponents go from “Wow, that’s a lot of coincidences” to “Hey, wait a minute..”

  • @omegafolf
    @omegafolf 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    Should have called the deck "The Nuclear Option"

    • @domri4203
      @domri4203 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I have become death destroyer of world's.

  • @matthewsanchez7953
    @matthewsanchez7953 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    That Atraxa player was probably scream-chewing on their keyboard lolololol

  • @RyanLangmuir
    @RyanLangmuir 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Throwing their computer though a window lol 😅😅😅

  • @blobface103
    @blobface103 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    The thing is, it feels like these new wraths were specifically made for the commander format. One of the reasons why it's sometimes so hard to cast a wrath in commander is because you spend your turn casting the wrath, and then everyone else starts rebuilding their board before you do. Wraths like sunfall (or the mite one) leave bodies on the battlefield, so you are not left with nothing on your board after a wrath. However, in standard, this translates to games where a wrath, whether it was strategically kept in hand or top decked, wins a player a game on its own.

  • @connorshea9085
    @connorshea9085 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    What's wild is that this isnt even all the wraths in standard. Red has Brotherhood's End, Calamitous Cave-In, and Burn Down the House, Black has Gix's Command, Drag to the Bottom, and Terror Tide, and White has Temporary Lockdown, Unstable Glyphbridge, and The Eternal Wanderer, and Blue even has The Phasing of Zhalfir. There is also Karn's Sylex, Corpse Explosion, Hostile Takeover, Temporal Firestorm. Not sure if Toxrill the Corrosive counts but it's kind of a slow wrath. So dependimg on how you're counting all the possible options there's over 20 wraths in standard

    • @davidhower7095
      @davidhower7095 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Not to mention all the smaller ones like End the Festivities and Bloodline Culling. Obviously won’t make the cut, but they do exist

    • @connorshea9085
      @connorshea9085 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I forgot By Invitation Only

    • @syrelian
      @syrelian 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      A bunch of those aren't Wraths at all, they're damaging sweepers but they don't just say Die

    • @wigglepants
      @wigglepants 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sweepers and wraths are the same thing. @@syrelian

    • @syrelian
      @syrelian 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@wigglepants No, they aren't, they often fill the same practical purpose when powerful enough, but they function on very different mechanisms, and damaging sweepers are in general much weaker, End The Festivities does not wipe the entire board clean, it does a minor amount of damage that can sweep weak creatures, Brotherhood's End does not wipe the board clean, it does a fair bit of damage that can sweep weak creatures, or it can clean out artifacts, those effects do not say "Destroy/Exile all creatures" or similar, they do damage

  • @hallowedmist4289
    @hallowedmist4289 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    if leyline binding didn't have the "an opponent controls" clause then that could have been some sneaky counter-tech hitting your own creature in response to a wrath that hits enchantments. Just the tiny little things that tune cards actually mattering makes me happy

    • @williamwalton9154
      @williamwalton9154 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have miss played several times thinking that it could.

    • @Red_Mag3
      @Red_Mag3 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      MTG design nowadays is kinda cowardly

    • @_Ve_98
      @_Ve_98 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@Red_Mag3Leyline binding is already a 1 mana instant speed exile effect that sees play in almost every format, what mote could you fucking want?

    • @Red_Mag3
      @Red_Mag3 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@_Ve_98 more salty replies honestly, but also less "once per turn" "activate only as a sorcery" "destroy NONbasic land"

    • @cousinpatsey2471
      @cousinpatsey2471 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Red_Mag3 nope, those limiters have good reason to be there most of the time.
      Design today is entirely too free with how strong a lot of cards are. There are the occasional that could be more bold with what they're allowed to do, Leyline Binding isn't one of them.

  • @jacobp8306
    @jacobp8306 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Oh, I've seen this, just that it's usually accompanied by a counter or something that can recover the board like Atraxa. So going full blown "NOTHING ELSE" is a new spin.

  • @dieguitopp
    @dieguitopp 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    omg, Seth, I really don't know what to say, this is so much you, I mean, this video is... I love you man. so much

  • @SilverAlex92
    @SilverAlex92 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You gotta give props to the domain atraxa opponent because they scooped with the farewell animation playing out, as if they literally got wrathed away.

  • @OriginalTomkat
    @OriginalTomkat 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for creating this! This made my year. I will think back on parts of this video for MONTHS, maybe years. Just epic!!!!!

  • @Comptonymous
    @Comptonymous 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    This has to be related to the Reddit post complaining about someone who played 5 wraths in 7 turns against them. Hilarious day.

  • @AeroSW
    @AeroSW 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    I'm surprised you didn't add the Eternal Wanderer into this deck to just have 1 more wrath that creates a creature.

    • @Muongoing.97c
      @Muongoing.97c 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      While that might make for a better deck, Seth is playing Against the Odds. If there’s a spell that isn’t a sorcery saying destroy all creatures or exile all creatures, then it’s not really an all wrath deck.

    • @noeschaeffer2167
      @noeschaeffer2167 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@Muongoing.97cinvasion of Fiora isn’t a sorcery

  • @EffinChat
    @EffinChat 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Seth losing to his colourless lands is the most Seth thing ever

  • @muhammadrafi4723
    @muhammadrafi4723 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Props to the domain guy who has the will to go through all of Seth's wrath. BO1 often has players who'll immediately scoop if you counter or answer their bombs 😂

  • @1997Awesomedude
    @1997Awesomedude 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I want to know at what point in the second game your opponent realized that you were only playing wraths, like is it after the 6th wrath? the 7th?

  • @stefanravalli6940
    @stefanravalli6940 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I was like "your first spell is on turn 3, at the earliest? No way", but this deck proved to be more than satire! I was surprised by how thoughtful certain elements of it turned out to be. For example, the man lands functioning as both mana sinks on non-wrath turns and rebuilding the inevitable early game life loss.

  • @pikachucknorris5441
    @pikachucknorris5441 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Opponent plays Virtue of Persistence against a 36 wraths deck lol, that's hilarious

  • @atk8r
    @atk8r 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes Seth!! This is what TH-cam and magic are all about! Love it and love you.

  • @steely6961
    @steely6961 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    That match against Domain was one of the greatest that I have seen.

  • @Chibifox
    @Chibifox 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Seth this deck was a joy to watch! That second match where you popped off with almost 20 wraths against the domain player had me rolling!

  • @VegtamTheWonderer
    @VegtamTheWonderer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Back in the Kaladesh Standard, I had a deck that was 24 board wipes and my win condition was Gonti, Lord of Luxury and Lost Legacy, and milling them out. It actually did pretty well in best of three because they didn't have the time to finish the second game.
    My favorite play was when I played my fourth Settle the Wreckage and my opponent said, "Well, at least that's the last Settle the Wreckage you can play on me." And then I played a Settle the Wreckage I had stolen from his deck with a Gonti.

  • @jewpcabra666
    @jewpcabra666 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    22:52 - "I cant imagine how tilting this has to be, i mean, i can imagine it and its glorious". This right here is why SO has a one-way ticket to hell 😆

  • @av0x220
    @av0x220 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This just made my day.
    Ngl i would probably break something if i would loose to that lmao.
    That Atraxa player went straight to sign up for therapy after that game for sure.

  • @TsahayluFa
    @TsahayluFa 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This deck makes my soul sing. Thank you for this divine experience.

  • @bradwhiteuk
    @bradwhiteuk 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hilarious deck! The pure entertainment value of just imagining how upset your opponents are getting 🤣

  • @yggdr9sil
    @yggdr9sil 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Seth entering his villain arc with the recent influx of Blood Moon, land destruction, and now board wipe tribal decks.

  • @jacktorborg9862
    @jacktorborg9862 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm not even into standard but this is the greatest video I have seen in my life

  • @obadijahparks
    @obadijahparks 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    22:36 the farewells came out to say.... well, you know what to your opponent. XD

  • @RyanLangmuir
    @RyanLangmuir 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    If you add all the spells in standard that give creatures -×-× and x damage theres probably at least 30 board wipes ... way way too many for any format

    • @ashdog9235
      @ashdog9235 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      According to scryfall there are 64 cards legal in current standard marked as sweepers

    • @RyanLangmuir
      @RyanLangmuir 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ashdog9235 i guess i grossly underestimated that

    • @davidhower7095
      @davidhower7095 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      62 of which are for creatures. Though a lot of them are -2/-2 or “deals 1 damage”, so it’s not as many as it sounds.
      Filter Out seems to be mistagged.

  • @Level_1_Frog
    @Level_1_Frog 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This might be my favourite standard deck you've ever made. Its such a simple concept- 'what if every non-land card was a wrath?' and it sounds preposterous, but the fact that its even possible in standard in a meta with very weak control magic and no combo kills, it just makes it so perfect. Utterly, devastatingly perfect.

  • @dimensionalineage
    @dimensionalineage 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    *Fantastic*!! What sweeper debauchery. Such a fan of this, as an exclusive control mage. The second epic game was notably engrossing.

  • @TheZjensen
    @TheZjensen 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I think it's the combo of lots of wraths that are very strong and lots of lands that are good that also make creatures. Without the land creatures, mill is the only way to win.

  • @frogpizza
    @frogpizza 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    cant imagine what opponents are thinking. what have you done, unleashing this onto the world seth

  • @LadyMapi
    @LadyMapi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The really gross thing is that, technically? This doesn't include all the wraths in Standard. Heck, MKM technically adds four new Wraths to Standard, including two that would slot into this deck (No Witnesses and Deadly Cover-Up)!

  • @arockalypsgaming
    @arockalypsgaming 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I had a deck like this before Alchemy was around. Was used only for the destroy x creatures and it was all wrath's but I also had 2 Approach's in the deck for a win con

  • @TennysonP348
    @TennysonP348 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "The upside of not drawing lands for so long is that we still have 7 wraths in hand" is an all-time Against the Odds line.

  • @javarrmalutei5740
    @javarrmalutei5740 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is just demented, crazy, and rage inducing... -Grabs the dek list- I love it!

  • @mattsreacts
    @mattsreacts 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    hey man thanks for posting your games, ive been struggling since i lost my job and posting videos has made it better and you inspired me

  • @luke1x
    @luke1x 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I am sorry Seth but I hate this deck as much as I love you, which is a lot. Keep up the great work in the salt mines!

    • @remigusker6024
      @remigusker6024 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's but an honest living mining salt. XD

  • @hiimemily
    @hiimemily 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    "Surely he won't have the seventeenth wrath..." - Gianchistuta, last words

  • @Spookydascaree
    @Spookydascaree 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m doing this right now with vein ripper as my only hero…a couple breach the multiverse and cruelty of gix. The vein ripper passive pops.

  • @Teurger
    @Teurger 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Now, this is a potential Clash deck! Reidane as commander, play him on shield side, and wrath every turn, until you win with Approach or lands. Let's learn how much wraths is too much!))

  • @orun713
    @orun713 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You have said "I don't think our opponent understands what's happening here" in multiple videos I've watched and I laugh every time because they clearly do not understand :D

  • @DocShotsPhotography
    @DocShotsPhotography 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The two sides of Seth.
    Commander: that’s so mean
    60 card: gleeful sadist

  • @n30t4zm4n
    @n30t4zm4n 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I love how it's an all wrath deck and he's not even running all the wrath spells in standard.

  • @bmcclure3atgatech
    @bmcclure3atgatech 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "I'm not just a jerk" - proceeds to wrath opponent into insanity while laughing about it

  • @mulldrifter6040
    @mulldrifter6040 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    You'd think the deck would do more poorly due to all the creature lands in the format, as that would be the correct counterplay for most decks. Not that I know the meta, but it looks like people should be playing more creature lands.

    • @cousinpatsey2471
      @cousinpatsey2471 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This video doesn't find a lot of the decks weaknesses, like RDW, or a UW control deck, or a deck with Restless Cottage.
      It's not as strong as it looks, it just happens to match up REALLY well against a few specific decks.

  • @Ramza1987
    @Ramza1987 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Against that Atraxa deck, casting Farewell as the "farewell card" was beyond glorious.

  • @drewgregory4079
    @drewgregory4079 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is basicly what beans attempts to do in the mirror. The deck is pretty threat-light, only having Migration, Atraxa, and the kicker angels. Since the deck has far more answers than it does threats, you win the beans mirror by not playing beans and boarding in a single jayce to mill your opponent first.

  • @tjimicole2677
    @tjimicole2677 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I've never been fan of these "garbage" brew videos …. until now. You've stirred in me a memory from 20 years ago, where I dared to posit a crazy idea. Insanity they told me. Of course it was. I was a child. And yet...
    I hadn't the money for even a single wrath at the time…let alone 27 of them or whatever this is.
    I…I think I get it now.

  • @Epicgaming1990
    @Epicgaming1990 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Lol oddly I just built a version of this was planning on playing it at Chicago

  • @totalcoward
    @totalcoward 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    How is this an Against the Odds? It looks like just a normal Crim deck to me

    • @LegitHarpyHunter
      @LegitHarpyHunter 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Misery was definitely on the menu.

  • @azullove979
    @azullove979 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is sooooo good, I laughed the whole time vs that domain deck!

  • @mattbee-yu5es
    @mattbee-yu5es 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is hilarious. Also: the ladder is gonna be rough today with a bunch of viewers slamming wrath decks LOL

  • @shadowfox513
    @shadowfox513 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Classic Seth AtO shenanigans here, I am all for it

  • @saltyBANDIT
    @saltyBANDIT 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Absolutely my favorite saffron deck, what a world. Just like WOTC intended :)

  • @stevomac102
    @stevomac102 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i once made a "kill everything" deck which was just mardu all removal. no wins cons i just had it when a daily challenge was "kill x creatures". this reminded me of that deck and the time i played against some midrange creature deck that just scooped after the 20th kill spell.

  • @stevezissou8900
    @stevezissou8900 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That was absolutely magnificent.

  • @theEevee098
    @theEevee098 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I'd hate to play against this deck. Also missing the LCI board wipe that can turn into a good creature

  • @AaronRotenberg
    @AaronRotenberg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    17:48 "Relentless Fortress" is a verbal typo, but it makes sense in this context.
    This game shows why a lot of the Domain decks have started running one or more Jaces to mill opponents out in the mirror match.

  • @raptorsovietico
    @raptorsovietico 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So FUN to watch, So Unfun to play, great content Seth!!

  • @JPEPIC88
    @JPEPIC88 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I feel no remorse for the domain player who has to endure that wrath a thon they deserve it more than anyone

  • @TransformersBoss
    @TransformersBoss 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There’s something poetic about the opponent scooping during the resolution of Farewell

  • @kmfdmman
    @kmfdmman 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You probably need to switch out two of the foundries with something else like the caves of koilos to make sure you always have more B/W mana. Might also want to run 27 lands and 61 cards.

  • @100nodog
    @100nodog หลายเดือนก่อน

    I found the deck I want to use to grind my daily wins. Thank you, Seth, for enlightening me.