you guys should make them vote for 2 people to be eliminated and then those two people have to do a challenge to see who gets to stay. You could look up some of the challenges on the show Survivor.
Not good for the viewers' sake for fan favorites Joe and Leah to go out THAT early. Should've delayed the eliminations a day after or perhaps even had the Sidemen decide on the worst contestant for the first two eliminations before letting players vote.
Thats the issue with shows like this, public vote ends up with the person with most subs winning, and the cast voting ends up with people just making an alliance to get out whoever they want gone
My only problem is that they didnt settle Leah vs Castillo on the basis of who spent more. That would have been fair and would show other contestants that saving is important
Maybe when its a tie for most nominations it should go down to who has spent the most (don’t have to reveal the amount) maybe it encourages them to do better at saving and in the challenges. Got to be something better than rock/paper/scissors
I agree, but make it more complex than just how much they spent. How much they’ve contributed and also cost the team. So ginge laughing in silent library should have -10k added to his total in addition to his spending, and Fanum should get +50k added to his total for eating the donut for example. This also incentivises them to try a bit harder in challenges, as well as creates a bit more competition. They might have been more willing to go for the higher value stuff in the eating channel for example if they knew it would give them an advantage in a tied vote.
That would be wayyyy more expensive as you’d need more cameras and camera people. With Inside, they have the “security” cameras on the walls, meaning less cameramen, and probably easier to edit from
If you guys do this again, more contestants that actually try. When the show is just full of people there for jokes, you might as well have just put them in a house with no actual show concept.
@@FeelsDonkMan some of them taking the piss seem like they'll start taking it more seriously, but so far its 7 who dont give a fuck and the 3 taking the concept seriously will be gone first
@@ScarletStrain its hard as well though because some people were probaly going in there with the mindset of taking it seriously but then its easy to crack when you see someone else spend fucking 20k on sweets i would break as well i would be like fuck that im taking a meal upgrade and a coke lol im not as strong minded as Leah or Joe tho
@@omari9593 meh i can see how people think its unlikely for them to win and just want to ruin it for others while enjoy the rest of their time there buying everything that makes them comfortable though
There just needs to be more incentive for the players to try and save the prize money, or penalties for big spenders or something. Because otherwise the meta would just be to vote out the strongest players who actually try like Joe, Leah, and Nife. Like at least Castillo and Fanum are spending and doing mastermind shit, but the rest are just there to spend and hang out, what's the point?
Cool concept for a show but the voting system ruined it in my opinion. You say you don't want it to be a popularity contest but people are getting voted out based on how popular you are in the house. The whole point of the show is to see who can spend the least and yet voting is based on who you're friends with. Which is unfair when people like Chloe already know a few of the people in the house, hence why she chose Specs over Joe. Those who spend the least should be rewarded with immunity or something, creates a bigger incentive.
yea honestly the more you spend the less voting power you should have. like the people who dont spend should have 10 votes and the people who spent should be down on 5 votes to give out
@@ducksauce9187 Not bad I like that idea a lot more than people saying "let the fans decide" cus then its just gonna be the most likeable "boring" people but the entertainment aspect would go way down. Like Marika or whatever her name is, of course im not a fan of her, but she is objectively good for the show from an entertainment aspect. You gotta have people like that on reality tv to make it more interesting
People voting cannot work, you are talking about people who are not fan of specific person. Some fans have a big fanbase, they have subreddits, discords etc. They will gang up and outnumber neutral people. If you put all sidemen with people voting, you know either Harry or JJ will win.
I think it’s the blend of different characters and personalities is what makes this so interesting, Specs and Manrika are necessary evil that play the villain role well.
idk how people see spec as evil man just chilling + he doesn't care about anything All the guys are funny asf and kept them inside less bored and the viewers
Honestly think instead of having a pure public vote, they should have a vote on Side+, then have a bottom 3 who the house votes for... Then you get the best of both worlds, cause like Joe and Leah definitely shouldn't have gone out first
Honestly it’s amazing because it’s almost like survivor your gonna have heroes and villains, Castillo is a perfect villain who does well with his sneaky spending, Leah is a hero with a legit want to test herself stays true to the reason she’s there
Honest, the first episode I watch 4 minutes and like turned show off, came back and watched again and all and now watched everything so far. Its good cast and concept. However some critic from my side that it could be more strictness in challanges, and give them option to lose it all or keep the amount of money that is left.
Different people watching the show in different ways , some want them to play the game seriously , some want them to be funny and create drama and content , ppl gotta understand that
Don't think you thought enough about your responsibilities to the young audience. Marika gas lit Joe and it's been brushed off. People's lives are ruined by being in relationships where they are subject to gaslighting and don't know how to recognise it and deal with it and it totally destroys their confidence. You should have addressed the issue head on and dealt with it. Think you were shocked by Joe going and by them not competing because you are all good human beings with strong morals. Most of them are not
On the other hand, Manrika has now had to lock down her platforms because of the sheer amount of threats, hate, and abuse. Yet not a single word of support from any of the sidemen on it to support her, ( I'm really not sticking up for her but two wrongs don't make a right) and her career could be in tatters now, what brand will want to work with someone who's instagram is just a sea of "your a vile human". This is why I feel the casting is appalling, these people aren't relatable, funny, or engaging, just intolerable thus generating the inevitable backlash that could be career ending for some. I feel like the sidemen/producers thought they could bring these influencers followers over to the platform by having them on the show, but no, its still just the usual sidemen audience watching, thats why people like Leah have gained 200k+ followers but the sidemen haven't gained anywhere near that. Next season they really need to appeal to their existing audience, could of had bambinobecki, Jack joseph, ally law, nightscape, Cole anderson, jay/romell, deji, willne, ollie ball, filly, chunkz, callux, freezy, gib, lauren alexis etc etc the list is endless and while people can't commit a week out of their lives for the show, id guarantee at least 3 of the ones I mentioned would of been able to commit to it/would love to do it
@@Effysocks didn't even know who manrika was before she came on, however she knew that whatever she said and did on the show would be shown to the audience so its her own fault if her career is in tatters now. just shows that she needs to change her personality especially if she's so self-centred that she can't even properly and sincerely say sorry to Joe
I was thinking for the next season do it with unknown TikTokers, Twitch streamers and TH-cams as they would want the notoriety and would help all of them boost there careers in their sectors so everyone wins in a way
(Spoilers) The votes should’ve been challenged based. I get you need a balance otherwise it would be boring but you’ve got 7 personalities all the same and 3 the same. With Joe gone the majority is too big to not gang up on Leah and nife and with Leah leaving it’s too easy to pick people off. The votes are based on personal opinions and feelings right now. But besides Castillo and fannum who are spending but not saying or trying to blame it on other people there’s some just spending for the sake of it. It’s like going on trust fund or big brother and spending as much money as you can to have a good time. But if the voting was challenged based it incentivizes people to try a bit more and it makes it fair you have a say in if you go out or not. Like in the challenge tv show there’s winners and losers in the challenge they vote on players to go head to head in an elimination loser goes home. The votes should have that style not just vote for your friends or who you like kinda ruins the game aspect of it. But these are things you learn as you do more of this content style I guess. Also the series is great a lot more entertaining then I thought however the coming up trailers have lowkey ruined the lure of the cliffhangers you leave at the end because well it just gives away who’s still in and who’s got eliminated anyways. Other than those 2 things the series has been great.
This has been awesome. I'd definitely be interested to see another season of this. I agree with you though, gotta look back and see what could change and how to make it better or funnier. Was definitely great, I love the mixture of uk and us people. It adds a little something to it especially with content creators. I love it man, has been alot of fun
This is why them deciding on the votes themselves suck All the remaining contestants will be those who share similar mindsets Fan Voting is MUCH better. Yes it's a "popularity contest" but still better than this way of voting
@thelasttimeitookashowerwas7069 fanum is close but I still think.ginge cos of the British audience he pulls, fanum American audience might not pull through
My healthy critique of the show would be that theres too many people who want to spend and theres no incentive for them to want to save , since theyre influencers who are getting clout either way. So theres a huge lack of tension when it comes to the money part. So there needs to be non influencers cast , or more incentive to save . The reason why specs is getting hate despite being entertaining is because hes taking the tension and excitement out of the format itself.
Yeah, not to be harsh, the show is great for its first season, but the housemates voting absolutely has to be changed if there’s a season 2. I think this and who got voted out almost ruined the show for a lot of us tbh. There could be some pretty creative ways to make a new system work tho imo. Between housemates voting, live audience voting, a point system, whoever has spent the most coming into play, maybe even the sidemen voting on one of the days. As well as the split or steal at the end. Every system has its problems, but I think there could be a combination that works quite well.
if it doesn’t happen this season next season y’all should. do a battle back competition between the people who got voted out earlier in the same season
I think Randy should be in one of the seasons. I know y’all don’t want to include people you guys know but at least one or two people would be good. Also, I think public voting would be good! Maybe it doesn’t have to decide every time someone leaves but at least one of the eliminations you should allow the public to vote. That would keep it juicy.
I think it would be fun if, in next season, they had to vote for someone (spends the most, worst in challenges) but they don’t know that they are voting them out; I think it’s become more of a “I am not close to them” thing, which is a popularity contest of sorts.
Hopefully they will make it bigger and longer. A week is too short to make things interesting. People need to stew in the boredom to start causing drama, hence why big brother lasts months. Also, if it lasts a month or something the temptation would weigh more, and they would have the opportunity to make the challenges bigger and more interesting. Of course tho, they would need to level up for that. They are at a mid high level because they don't earn as much as they spend once it gets too big, but that could be solved by getting normal sponsors instead of paying it themselves and using only SDMN brand stuff.
See Leah is proof that most well known doesn’t mean you could win. I reckon she may have won the show if public voting. But the sidemen audience barely know her.
That actually would be wild if they went inside themselves and maybe added like a doesnt have to plan sidemen sundays for x amount of days or something to get them more invested in the winners and had like the troops come in and do challenges for them. It would be Inside Pt. II Sidemen Edition. Maybe have like Phil or someone also. Just hard cause they all know eachother so maybe votes can be based on something else.
solid show, its been fun, but the editing spoiled who got eliminated in the first episode preview which is really poor. we already knew joe was going and leah before it happens. Otherwise the concept is great, can only imagine it improves if you do another
Season 2 is a must so long as the sidemen learn from the mistakes made. The things that need changing are the voting system, the public needs to be involved and it's a revenue stream, the usual housemates put up several people for the public to vote on should suffice. More sidemen involved in the show somehow. Revealing what is being spent and by who as well as a consequence for spending eg immunity for those who don't spend. A lot more publicity that the next series is about to begin. More food focused tasks rather than having the opportunity to upgrade meals they have to earn them. I don't want to commit to a subscription but would happily spend a little on a vote. That's the revenue stream you should be tapping into.
"the editor did her dirty, she was actually jokes, its all in context." All she had to do was "im sorry wont happen again", not a half assed "i apologize" then victimize herself and blame Joe for being offended 😂😂 Shes definitely perfect for this shit but people are crazy and actually might feel some type of way, cause it kinda honestly didn't feel fake at all from her. I genuinely wonder what goes on in her brain.
5:45 10 people not spending on stupid shit I mean sure spend on one offs, spend on meal upgrades,salt or a soft drink every couple days but not a fckn cuddly toy and instruments
It would still be a popularity vote but from the public who only see snippets of the game. I think it adds a different facet having it all within the house.
HEAR ME OUT - OutSide I’m a celeb style spinoff season where you take em either to a forest,jungle etc and have challenges with more bugs, dodgy food etc Would get some funny clips 😂
how can you and other sidemen say specs is jokes when he’s rubbing up to girls 20 years younger and constantly being a creep saying he wants to shower with them and share a bed
Its very disappointing to see Sidemen encouraging this. Then you see people say 'You just gotta know him to understand'. Like what part of him being a creep makes people want to check him out?
Watch ep4 of side+ all the girls said they love specs because he keeps the vibes and energy high with his jokes. They even gave him a massage because they said he deserves it 😂😂 literally everyone in there loves him
Everyone in the house has said specs is literally the funniest guy in there! Even Leah when she got voted out said she thinks specs will win because he’s so funny and keeps the energy high 🤣
The thing is with voting , yes I get it shouldn’t be a popularity contest so don’t leave it to the public , but I don’t think you would have realised that the people that are watching would have backed weller and Leah so hard that we wanted them In regardless of their following , just something to think about cause we liked them and Leah was unknown to me personally and I backed her all the way
To me, something feels off. I understand not wanting all try hards, but you need people who are going to be jokes while respecting the concept/integrity of the game. Also there’s no way to offset the power people have of carelessly spending money. The people who want to save can’t do anything about that. The power is in the spenders when there should also be some power on the hands of those who save. There needs to be some sort of leverage that they can have/get to stop people from spending. Or there needs to be some reward or extra incentive to not spend money. Or there needs to be a penalty to the person who spends the most in a day or something like that. Make how much the individuals spend matter a little bit
Big Brother US still streams 24/7 (when they arent being pricks) I think the issue there is, Inside is only 7 days (which is a perfect amount of time for this concept) And the cost to stream it all 24/7 to viewers will jack the cost up huge. And with it being such a short amount of time, it prolly isnt worth it.
The reason why Specs is being disliked is because he is taking the tension and excitement out of the money part of the show , despite being entertaining . If there was more incentive , or people tried to play with the format it would be much more exciting
I disagree with there being 'a good balance' in the cast. There weren't enough people who weren't keen on spending and they predictably got eliminated. The stakes feel lower in recent episodes. Just feels like a comedy show with fake arguments when nobody actually cares about the money. If it was split 5 - 5 or something I think there would have been a lot more room for genuine conflict.
so sad the first two elims got leaked from the coming up teasers. hope you guys also know you messed up so if you make a season 2 it doesnt get spoiled
but locked in is votes at the end and the videos come out like a day after is been filmed. and in celebrity big brother, the winners not necessarily the most famous one
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA Finals D2 | Fall | ต้องรักษาฟอร์ม อย่ายอมให้ใครแซง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/x38QsGn7A3M/mqdefault.jpg)
What’s been your favourite challenge so far? Leave a comment !
Silent Library
the guy not knowing what the century egg was & trying to beavo it whole
you guys should make them vote for 2 people to be eliminated and then those two people have to do a challenge to see who gets to stay. You could look up some of the challenges on the show Survivor.
Silent library my favourite concept not sure if it was executed the best tho, the actaul challenges themselves.
Silent library
Once Joe went out it was obvious they were gonna gang up on Leah lol. Wouldnt be surprised if Nife goes next.
Not good for the viewers' sake for fan favorites Joe and Leah to go out THAT early. Should've delayed the eliminations a day after or perhaps even had the Sidemen decide on the worst contestant for the first two eliminations before letting players vote.
Thats the issue with shows like this, public vote ends up with the person with most subs winning, and the cast voting ends up with people just making an alliance to get out whoever they want gone
My only problem is that they didnt settle Leah vs Castillo on the basis of who spent more. That would have been fair and would show other contestants that saving is important
Bunch of goons
@@RobaMostarRobanah man, rock paper scissors is the way to decide
I can see NiFe getting voted out next considering the big spenders ain't getting eliminated any time soon
£2.50 prize fund is going to pop off.
And shes annoying ngl - she said she wanted to show her personality but i can see why she only posts dancing content
@@Plastic_ she went from a respectable woman to throwing herself at Fanum
Well it's Castillo brev
One of my main critiques would be the upcoming trailers. They keep spoiling who gets eliminated
yea
Maybe when its a tie for most nominations it should go down to who has spent the most (don’t have to reveal the amount) maybe it encourages them to do better at saving and in the challenges. Got to be something better than rock/paper/scissors
I agree, but make it more complex than just how much they spent. How much they’ve contributed and also cost the team. So ginge laughing in silent library should have -10k added to his total in addition to his spending, and Fanum should get +50k added to his total for eating the donut for example. This also incentivises them to try a bit harder in challenges, as well as creates a bit more competition. They might have been more willing to go for the higher value stuff in the eating channel for example if they knew it would give them an advantage in a tied vote.
This is a good idea. I think it wouldn't be very entertaining for the public to vote. The contestants with the largest fan base would always win.
Castillo deserves that Fanta sponsorship cos I honestly didn't know there was a Fanta light before this 😂
I suddenly got a craving for lemon Fanta, they should definitely sponsor him brev
the idea of a camping one called outside is so good
Like a survivor ting, they can recruit Joe again for that 😅
It could be a like a survivor formatted series.
That would be wayyyy more expensive as you’d need more cameras and camera people. With Inside, they have the “security” cameras on the walls, meaning less cameramen, and probably easier to edit from
Two Teams, Survivor or Total Drama Themed
remote island
If you guys do this again, more contestants that actually try. When the show is just full of people there for jokes, you might as well have just put them in a house with no actual show concept.
No way of knowing if they will care though. People easily swing as well once others start spending
you need both, the people there for jokes are the ones making it watchable. it's a good mix I think
@@FeelsDonkMan some of them taking the piss seem like they'll start taking it more seriously, but so far its 7 who dont give a fuck and the 3 taking the concept seriously will be gone first
I would love for one of the biggest spenders to end up winning but there's only like £200 left, would be jokes
@@ScarletStrain its hard as well though because some people were probaly going in there with the mindset of taking it seriously but then its easy to crack when you see someone else spend fucking 20k on sweets i would break as well i would be like fuck that im taking a meal upgrade and a coke lol im not as strong minded as Leah or Joe tho
Specs just give weird vibes. Yes he's funny sometimes but the vibes aint right at all.
With men its okay, they're lads
But ffs specs you're almost 50, stop touching girls who could be your daughter age
Peak “where’s my hug at?” vibes
@@alexanderrose1071 you have to know him. He calls his wife podolski like you can’t take anything he does serious lol
@@whoknows3PX he’s touching every woman on the show wayyyy too much. It’s creepy
he is a 14 year old kid with ADHD inside. even though his actual age is 40+
The problem with the cast just spending randomly, is that it gives the impression it’s fake. It’s not a real prize pot.
Exactly!
@@omari9593 meh i can see how people think its unlikely for them to win and just want to ruin it for others while enjoy the rest of their time there buying everything that makes them comfortable though
There just needs to be more incentive for the players to try and save the prize money, or penalties for big spenders or something. Because otherwise the meta would just be to vote out the strongest players who actually try like Joe, Leah, and Nife. Like at least Castillo and Fanum are spending and doing mastermind shit, but the rest are just there to spend and hang out, what's the point?
bruh sidemen want them to spend the money fuck u think lol, you think they want to pay them 1 mil? they want it to go down to 100-200k
Cool concept for a show but the voting system ruined it in my opinion. You say you don't want it to be a popularity contest but people are getting voted out based on how popular you are in the house. The whole point of the show is to see who can spend the least and yet voting is based on who you're friends with. Which is unfair when people like Chloe already know a few of the people in the house, hence why she chose Specs over Joe. Those who spend the least should be rewarded with immunity or something, creates a bigger incentive.
i agree
yea honestly the more you spend the less voting power you should have. like the people who dont spend should have 10 votes and the people who spent should be down on 5 votes to give out
@@ducksauce9187 Not bad I like that idea a lot more than people saying "let the fans decide" cus then its just gonna be the most likeable "boring" people but the entertainment aspect would go way down. Like Marika or whatever her name is, of course im not a fan of her, but she is objectively good for the show from an entertainment aspect. You gotta have people like that on reality tv to make it more interesting
People voting cannot work, you are talking about people who are not fan of specific person. Some fans have a big fanbase, they have subreddits, discords etc. They will gang up and outnumber neutral people. If you put all sidemen with people voting, you know either Harry or JJ will win.
Isn’t episode 5 meant to come out now why isn’t it out
From next season u guys should do the vote out for only those contestant who lose the task ...
Yes the ones who fail the challenges are the only ones available to get votes
I think it’s the blend of different characters and personalities is what makes this so interesting, Specs and Manrika are necessary evil that play the villain role well.
idk how people see spec as evil man just chilling + he doesn't care about anything All the guys are funny asf and kept them inside less bored and the viewers
This is what people dont understand, you have to have villains in reality tv
The true villain is Castillo brev
@@Jose-kd2suhad leah crying in the post game interview 💀
@@Daniel-oz6qu Just saw it now💀what a guy man
Honestly think instead of having a pure public vote, they should have a vote on Side+, then have a bottom 3 who the house votes for...
Then you get the best of both worlds, cause like Joe and Leah definitely shouldn't have gone out first
Things being alright between Joe and the Sidemen, is great to see.
Season 2 for sure
This show is a great example of how spoiled and entitled influencers are.
10:39 Josh cringing at himself after saying "coldest moments" 😂😂
Honestly it’s amazing because it’s almost like survivor your gonna have heroes and villains, Castillo is a perfect villain who does well with his sneaky spending, Leah is a hero with a legit want to test herself stays true to the reason she’s there
Lannan and Danny in season 2 would be jokes
Can't see lazerbeam allowing himself to be trapped inside a house controlled by the Sidemen. Would be funny though, I agree lol.
@@dyoutube439 fair lol but Mr Beast managed to get him on a raft in the middle of the sea for a week a house can’t be too bad 😂
Danny is horrid to watch
Lannan yes Danny no
EXPRESSIONS NEEDS BE ON SZN2 !!!!!
I just commented the same thing then seen you'd suggested the same after lol
Josh’s QnA of Inside is so much better than Simon’s. He answered some real questions
no need to compare them mate
@arien_p its called freedom of expression. He's well within his right to compare if he wants to.
I guess Josh is more involved than Simon so he can answer more things.
make their spending stats matter tbh. leah, joe, and nife got targetted pretty easily because they wanted to play the game clean
SEASON 2 PLEASEE!
Honest, the first episode I watch 4 minutes and like turned show off, came back and watched again and all and now watched everything so far. Its good cast and concept. However some critic from my side that it could be more strictness in challanges, and give them option to lose it all or keep the amount of money that is left.
Different people watching the show in different ways , some want them to play the game seriously , some want them to be funny and create drama and content , ppl gotta understand that
I want a season 2 it’s so good
Will we get a reunion episode? I’d love to see them all asking Castillo about the 30k Chinese 😂😂
Leah is the best she will eliminated today this is very sad to Australians
She isn't the best 😂
@@bro89174 She is the best.
have a cry mate. she’s kind but the games the game
Don't think you thought enough about your responsibilities to the young audience. Marika gas lit Joe and it's been brushed off. People's lives are ruined by being in relationships where they are subject to gaslighting and don't know how to recognise it and deal with it and it totally destroys their confidence. You should have addressed the issue head on and dealt with it.
Think you were shocked by Joe going and by them not competing because you are all good human beings with strong morals. Most of them are not
On the other hand, Manrika has now had to lock down her platforms because of the sheer amount of threats, hate, and abuse. Yet not a single word of support from any of the sidemen on it to support her, ( I'm really not sticking up for her but two wrongs don't make a right) and her career could be in tatters now, what brand will want to work with someone who's instagram is just a sea of "your a vile human". This is why I feel the casting is appalling, these people aren't relatable, funny, or engaging, just intolerable thus generating the inevitable backlash that could be career ending for some. I feel like the sidemen/producers thought they could bring these influencers followers over to the platform by having them on the show, but no, its still just the usual sidemen audience watching, thats why people like Leah have gained 200k+ followers but the sidemen haven't gained anywhere near that. Next season they really need to appeal to their existing audience, could of had bambinobecki, Jack joseph, ally law, nightscape, Cole anderson, jay/romell, deji, willne, ollie ball, filly, chunkz, callux, freezy, gib, lauren alexis etc etc the list is endless and while people can't commit a week out of their lives for the show, id guarantee at least 3 of the ones I mentioned would of been able to commit to it/would love to do it
@@Effysocks idk, if the cast is just people weve seen already in the UK creator scene then it would be pretty boring
@@Effysocks didn't even know who manrika was before she came on, however she knew that whatever she said and did on the show would be shown to the audience so its her own fault if her career is in tatters now. just shows that she needs to change her personality especially if she's so self-centred that she can't even properly and sincerely say sorry to Joe
@@WiseRin07 very true tbf
@@WiseRin07that's not how you get people to change, maybe that's how you get them to commit suicide if that's the justice you want.
Bring on season 2!!!!!
you should have made a inside channel it deserved its own
I was thinking for the next season do it with unknown TikTokers, Twitch streamers and TH-cams as they would want the notoriety and would help all of them boost there careers in their sectors so everyone wins in a way
We need a Season 2 FOR SURE!
Y’all gotta make the viewers vote live
(Spoilers) The votes should’ve been challenged based. I get you need a balance otherwise it would be boring but you’ve got 7 personalities all the same and 3 the same. With Joe gone the majority is too big to not gang up on Leah and nife and with Leah leaving it’s too easy to pick people off. The votes are based on personal opinions and feelings right now. But besides Castillo and fannum who are spending but not saying or trying to blame it on other people there’s some just spending for the sake of it. It’s like going on trust fund or big brother and spending as much money as you can to have a good time. But if the voting was challenged based it incentivizes people to try a bit more and it makes it fair you have a say in if you go out or not. Like in the challenge tv show there’s winners and losers in the challenge they vote on players to go head to head in an elimination loser goes home. The votes should have that style not just vote for your friends or who you like kinda ruins the game aspect of it. But these are things you learn as you do more of this content style I guess. Also the series is great a lot more entertaining then I thought however the coming up trailers have lowkey ruined the lure of the cliffhangers you leave at the end because well it just gives away who’s still in and who’s got eliminated anyways. Other than those 2 things the series has been great.
This has been awesome. I'd definitely be interested to see another season of this. I agree with you though, gotta look back and see what could change and how to make it better or funnier. Was definitely great, I love the mixture of uk and us people. It adds a little something to it especially with content creators. I love it man, has been alot of fun
Why did you guys brought 2 friends to the show, marinka and Chloe just covers each other’s back
This is why them deciding on the votes themselves suck
All the remaining contestants will be those who share similar mindsets
Fan Voting is MUCH better. Yes it's a "popularity contest" but still better than this way of voting
There's no point then cos we all know ginge would have one if it was fans voting
@@sas17Would’ve been Leah
@@sas17 it would have been fanum brev, one shoutout by kai and he goes to the top in terms of voting!
@thelasttimeitookashowerwas7069 fanum is close but I still think.ginge cos of the British audience he pulls, fanum American audience might not pull through
@@MysticMarble yeah the amount of Simps would have been to powerful for anyone else to win
Loving it so far. The only thing I would like to see is hud when they buy something so u know how much it is!
i like the show good ideas bruv. Keep things coming. Maybe do a survival type of one.
"I'd like to confirm 2 Fanta Lites... And the Assist Token Brev"- Castillo, 2024.
They should all meet at the end and see best moments and ranking of spenders
Take Ray, YourRage or any other AMP member if Season 2 happens 😊
also improve the editing man, the teaser at the end of episode 1 spoiled a lot of the show lmao
My healthy critique of the show would be that theres too many people who want to spend and theres no incentive for them to want to save , since theyre influencers who are getting clout either way. So theres a huge lack of tension when it comes to the money part.
So there needs to be non influencers cast , or more incentive to save . The reason why specs is getting hate despite being entertaining is because hes taking the tension and excitement out of the format itself.
Yeah, not to be harsh, the show is great for its first season, but the housemates voting absolutely has to be changed if there’s a season 2. I think this and who got voted out almost ruined the show for a lot of us tbh. There could be some pretty creative ways to make a new system work tho imo. Between housemates voting, live audience voting, a point system, whoever has spent the most coming into play, maybe even the sidemen voting on one of the days. As well as the split or steal at the end. Every system has its problems, but I think there could be a combination that works quite well.
admin appreciates the shoutout 🫡
Locked in >>>>> Inside
if it doesn’t happen this season next season y’all should. do a battle back competition between the people who got voted out earlier in the same season
Inside should happen once every 4 months. Make it happen daddy Zerkaa!!
We need fanum ginge and specs in season 2
Don't pre record season 2
The haters had nothing to say after the first couple episodes lmaoooo
Need inside with real everyday people, if the “hate” is the only worry then just get adults who can deal with it
I think Randy should be in one of the seasons. I know y’all don’t want to include people you guys know but at least one or two people would be good. Also, I think public voting would be good! Maybe it doesn’t have to decide every time someone leaves but at least one of the eliminations you should allow the public to vote. That would keep it juicy.
Idk how I would go about getting involved in this, do a public one I beg.
I think it would be fun if, in next season, they had to vote for someone (spends the most, worst in challenges) but they don’t know that they are voting them out; I think it’s become more of a “I am not close to them” thing, which is a popularity contest of sorts.
Josh you guys could do a season a month or somthing
YES THERE SHOULD BE A S2 ITS SO GOOD
S4?
@@irdk6891 idek how i messed it up so bad holy it was prob because i woke up, i meant season 2 mb.
I think if u do a season 2 please try get expressions on it, he'll be similar to Castillo and he is just really funny
Niko and Agent need to be in the next season
Hopefully they will make it bigger and longer. A week is too short to make things interesting. People need to stew in the boredom to start causing drama, hence why big brother lasts months. Also, if it lasts a month or something the temptation would weigh more, and they would have the opportunity to make the challenges bigger and more interesting.
Of course tho, they would need to level up for that. They are at a mid high level because they don't earn as much as they spend once it gets too big, but that could be solved by getting normal sponsors instead of paying it themselves and using only SDMN brand stuff.
You guys should mix it up, do normal sidemen videos and the season 2 thingy
See Leah is proof that most well known doesn’t mean you could win. I reckon she may have won the show if public voting. But the sidemen audience barely know her.
Question: did you guys prompt Fanum and Nife to add a romantic angle?
They're just vibing. Fanum is based in the US and Nife is in the UK
That actually would be wild if they went inside themselves and maybe added like a doesnt have to plan sidemen sundays for x amount of days or something to get them more invested in the winners and had like the troops come in and do challenges for them. It would be Inside Pt. II Sidemen Edition. Maybe have like Phil or someone also. Just hard cause they all know eachother so maybe votes can be based on something else.
solid show, its been fun, but the editing spoiled who got eliminated in the first episode preview which is really poor. we already knew joe was going and leah before it happens. Otherwise the concept is great, can only imagine it improves if you do another
would love an inside with just the boys and some of there friends
Season 2 is a must so long as the sidemen learn from the mistakes made. The things that need changing are the voting system, the public needs to be involved and it's a revenue stream, the usual housemates put up several people for the public to vote on should suffice. More sidemen involved in the show somehow. Revealing what is being spent and by who as well as a consequence for spending eg immunity for those who don't spend. A lot more publicity that the next series is about to begin. More food focused tasks rather than having the opportunity to upgrade meals they have to earn them. I don't want to commit to a subscription but would happily spend a little on a vote. That's the revenue stream you should be tapping into.
I think for season 2 we need more days, more ways to earn money back and some kind of penalty for big spenders to prevent them from going overboard
definitely start planning for season 2!! how about swapping out the angry ginge for a chill one?
Zerkaa answered😂
Answered what
What?
this is the best show I've ever seen. personally I don't think LIVE would be a good idea
"the editor did her dirty, she was actually jokes, its all in context."
All she had to do was "im sorry wont happen again", not a half assed "i apologize" then victimize herself and blame Joe for being offended 😂😂
Shes definitely perfect for this shit but people are crazy and actually might feel some type of way, cause it kinda honestly didn't feel fake at all from her. I genuinely wonder what goes on in her brain.
3:40 exactly what happened with Kaci Jay in locked in popularity contest bs
5:45 10 people not spending on stupid shit I mean sure spend on one offs, spend on meal upgrades,salt or a soft drink every couple days but not a fckn cuddly toy and instruments
Inside 2 pleaaaaaase!!! This show is too good! Feels so much more raw than the garbage reality we get in Tv.. Hopefully this is the first of many!
If you do a version with non-influencers you could do a live vote from audience as then its not a popularity competition
It would still be a popularity vote but from the public who only see snippets of the game. I think it adds a different facet having it all within the house.
Deji needs to be in season 2
Get Big Gibber in there too
HEAR ME OUT -
OutSide
I’m a celeb style spinoff season where you take em either to a forest,jungle etc and have challenges with more bugs, dodgy food etc
Would get some funny clips 😂
how can you and other sidemen say specs is jokes when he’s rubbing up to girls 20 years younger and constantly being a creep saying he wants to shower with them and share a bed
Its very disappointing to see Sidemen encouraging this. Then you see people say 'You just gotta know him to understand'. Like what part of him being a creep makes people want to check him out?
Constantly wanting sweets and shit too like he's 5. Weird guy on god
Watch ep4 of side+ all the girls said they love specs because he keeps the vibes and energy high with his jokes. They even gave him a massage because they said he deserves it 😂😂 literally everyone in there loves him
@@arsenewenger49 That's crazy because bro has a wife and he's so touchy with the girls.
@@FLM_OFF he’s “touchy” with everyone, and all the girls love him 🤣
I thought Specs was a very funny guy before this, but after this, he gives me creep and weird vibes.
i have not found specs funny even a single time all these 4 episodes and here josh says he is quite funny; humor is really subjective!
Ur humor must be dry then, everytime he speaks its funny
Everyone in the house has said specs is literally the funniest guy in there! Even Leah when she got voted out said she thinks specs will win because he’s so funny and keeps the energy high 🤣
Get Jay or Romell in season 2
DEFINITELY!!!!
The thing is with voting , yes I get it shouldn’t be a popularity contest so don’t leave it to the public , but I don’t think you would have realised that the people that are watching would have backed weller and Leah so hard that we wanted them In regardless of their following , just something to think about cause we liked them and Leah was unknown to me personally and I backed her all the way
There needs to be a way for the ones who want to protect the money to earn that opportunity, like a “freezing” reward or “lock” action
It’s not looking good Brav
"Brev"
Let Leah and joe come back for season 2
To me, something feels off. I understand not wanting all try hards, but you need people who are going to be jokes while respecting the concept/integrity of the game. Also there’s no way to offset the power people have of carelessly spending money. The people who want to save can’t do anything about that. The power is in the spenders when there should also be some power on the hands of those who save. There needs to be some sort of leverage that they can have/get to stop people from spending. Or there needs to be some reward or extra incentive to not spend money. Or there needs to be a penalty to the person who spends the most in a day or something like that. Make how much the individuals spend matter a little bit
Who tf is saying L on the first episode? This shi is good as.
Give the audience 1 or 2 votes to add to the contestants
Big Brother US still streams 24/7 (when they arent being pricks)
I think the issue there is, Inside is only 7 days (which is a perfect amount of time for this concept)
And the cost to stream it all 24/7 to viewers will jack the cost up huge.
And with it being such a short amount of time, it prolly isnt worth it.
The reason why Specs is being disliked is because he is taking the tension and excitement out of the money part of the show , despite being entertaining . If there was more incentive , or people tried to play with the format it would be much more exciting
Getting the vibe of the show from chat is not smart. Killtony uses that feature and has for a long time now.
Could do it twice a year
I disagree with there being 'a good balance' in the cast. There weren't enough people who weren't keen on spending and they predictably got eliminated. The stakes feel lower in recent episodes. Just feels like a comedy show with fake arguments when nobody actually cares about the money. If it was split 5 - 5 or something I think there would have been a lot more room for genuine conflict.
so sad the first two elims got leaked from the coming up teasers. hope you guys also know you messed up so if you make a season 2 it doesnt get spoiled
but locked in is votes at the end and the videos come out like a day after is been filmed. and in celebrity big brother, the winners not necessarily the most famous one
Zerkaa ret@rded for calling Paprika jokes.
On god. That manrika is actually jarring