By far the most common comment has been that using Resolve Studio rather than the free version would have changed the results because of it's GPU support. Hardware acceleration is only missing from the free Windows version of Resolve, on the Mac it is built in.
@@rano12321 Yes, it's true, free only has DECODE for H.264, however, the Studio has both ENCODE and DECODE hardware acceleration for both H.264/265. There are a few other features that are only available in Studio and not the free version, but you DO get 95% of studio in the free. Good news is, a $295 or so one time payment and you get the updates, I think for life. That said, you can also buy accessories through Black Magic to help offset the software support.
I've been using Final Cut for 6 years now, for me there was no other software that could match it, but I'm amazed on how Resolve its close to being my favorite now. And premiere.. well thanks to Premiere I dont have hair right now.
Yap I agree to that there's no need to argue or take side on which is the better/best and faster apps or a piece of tech you use. It's all about what is your preference, comfortability and needs on the apps/tech you used.
Final Cut is a good reliable editor. I don’t have anything against it, but it’s limited when it comes to motion graphics, and I don’t understand why Apple can’t make it integrate better with Motion. I use Resolve because not only is it buttery smooth and fast, it’s a powerhouse when it comes to compositing and color grading. Premiere is just a dumpster fire I gave up on over a year ago because it’s too cluttered, unstable, and slow.
9:40 Final Cut can totally export a clip from the timeline. We got that around 3 updates ago. You just have to select a range from the timeline with the Range tool and hit export. That way It will only export the range you selected.
I think you misunderstand what I was saying, Resolve allows you to export all the clips in a time as new files with handles on the beginning and end. So effectively our have just the good bits and you can either bring those into another NLE or archive them. In final cut, you just have one finished clip
Divinci, and FCP smoke premier and a joy to use. FCP for me was easier to learn, but divinci is the one I wanna get better at as I get more into film making and color grading.
At the 8:46 mark you recommend going for the M1 Max rather than the M1 Pro for the H.264/ProRes decoders, but both chips have those decoders, it's just that the Max has double the dedicated accelerators of the M1 Pro. Great video though, somewhat surprising results.
Buuut in resolve you can export every clip on the timeline as an individual clip - great for grading and creating proxies, or for dalies exports from a DIT. Resolve is simply much better at both transcoding and exporting - which makes sense as that is it's core functionality from before it wanted to be an NLE.
I find it insane that DaVinci Resolve (the free version) is beating out FCP and Premiere Pro in quite a few of these tests, that’s super impressive. I am still using the free version of Resolve (on an M1 Mac mini 16GB) and I haven’t really hit the ceiling yet (except for a few features that would be nice such as denoiser). I switched from Premiere Pro about a year ago and I honestly haven’t looked back since, great bit of software! Would be interested in seeing how well Fusion works with the M1 Pro and Max chips, as it is quite slow for most things on the M1 basic chip. Nice tests and great video, Tyler! 👌
Sarah Dietchty did a video about these machines and said the Fusion functions do not work that well with the M1 Max, that it's one of the few things that slows it down.
Little note. Also the scale of the window impacts timeline playback I’ve noticed. I tend to leave mine at 50% often. That works better than “fit”. (I mainly use premiere.)
Thank you so so much for going through the stress of putting your computer through this! I did not have the patience, which is how I found you. I lowkey have a crush on you, because of your level of patience hahaha. Thanks for these comparisons.
Hey Tyler, if you could start again, would you choose the Resolve or stay with FCP? I've just ordered my first Macbook Pro. At one side I found FCP more intuitive. At the other for my hobby non-commercial use Resolve would made more sense, altough it has a steeper learn curve...
Hands down Final Cut is going to perform the best, but I do think running screen recordings and running off of an external drive massively hindered the other two applications. These internal SSD's are insanely fast and definitely help with performance.
I expected it to be more hands down that it was, and working from external drives is a must for all video editors. Also I tested the exports both on internal and external. The difference was actually pretty insignificant compared to other variables
This isn’t the studio version of the resolve, so probably not the best comparison there. If I’m not mistaken, studio has some extra encoding features as well as GPU acceleration.
“No fans” Just like Adobe after switching to FCPX and an M1 machine 🤠 Jokes aside, great video! I was a long time Premiere user on a custom built PC and after picking up an M1 Pro machine and swapping to FCPX, i’ll never go back. I solely edit on my Mac now and that’s coming from a hardcore windows user!
You can export part of timeline if FC! You should choose this part by yellow markers(I don’t no correct name) and than press share (export button in right top angle)
Good afternoon from myself in the UK. I upgraded from my M1 iMAC to the Studio M1 Ultra three months ago and just returned it yesterday to Apple after quite a few issues with it. I've just picked up the 2021 MacBook Pro M1 Max. I already use PP but I'm considerrrrrrrrringgggggg (deep breath) moving to FCP. There's a link in this video to a comparison but unfortunately its from 2019. Do you have an updated video please as since that time i'm sure both software will have improved massively. Thanks so much. Lee
EDIT: resolve only uses the hardware decoders in studio version, it performs a LOT better if you use the studio version original comment: I use final cut because the magnetic timeline makes me edit like 4x faster and I have way more fun editing
One thing I'd like to mention is that with premiere pro you can use media encoder thus allowing you to render out multiple videos at once. Other than that this is a great video
editing is so much more efficient in FCP. and besides Resolve can't use ProRES RAW (unless you do a complicated conversion) - deal breaker for me. Everything has too many options in Resolve - I'm sure that is good for some but another complication for others.
Great job man ! I found out recently about your channel through your video about grading in FCP, and subscribed immediately ! I'm a video editor (though I've recently cut an american feature film), and I've been cutting on FCP since 2013 on the same 27 inch iMac with memory 32 Gb. My computer has been struggling with dailies for a while now, and can't handle 4K smoothly, forcing me to create proxies every time. I've been contemplating buying a macbook pro M1 max - even more since I watched that video - but I'm tempted to wait for an hypothetical new iMac for even better performances. What do you think ? Anyway, keep up the great work !
If I’m not mistaken you said resolve wasn’t studio version. That’s really unfair comparison. There’s a huge difference between the studio and free version especially when it comes to encoders. So you probably update this video with the studio version.
Please don't use the free version of resolve with two paid software, use the studio version of Resolve while comparing. It's not just about GPU support not all codecs are supported on the free version. All the other videos I've seen resolve studio demolished both final cut and premiere on M1 max.
You made a small mistake , you didn't use studio version of resolve which means, gpu acceleration is not enabled that's why Da vanci resolve losing here and there-Not a fair battel...(note only studio version if Da vinci resolve can utilize the gpu fully.)
Something to consider: the widespread use of high-quality stock footage and images is probably not doing society any favours. All those images of perfectly presented, shiny happy families laughing together may sell Coca Cola, but I think they also depress people. Everyone knows they're fake, false, insincere. But, because we're silly chimps, we still think those fake images are aspirational. That's really destructive. Anyway, back to the topic at hand...
I’m sure I’m not the only one, but resolve studio would be the best comparison, I never had a good experience with the free version, but the studio version outperforms fcpx in my experience even on an intel mac
Had a hard time finding parameters in the export comparison. What time of the video, etc. I tend to just balpark in length of time of video with length of time of export.
Everybody’s always making videos about what software is faster, what tips to make you a faster editor, do this to be faster do that to be faster… Faster faster faster. Fast has nothing to do with quality. I’m an incredibly fast editor and I could care less about being fast. I care about being good. And besides, the faster you edit the less money you make. Being nuanced and skillful is way more important than being fast.
I hear Resolve straight up can’t handle ProRes very well. As it was seen here resolve beats the others when playing Canon RAW LT but loses ProRes even tho ProRes is easier.
If you were just getting started, which would you choose? In the video, you said the DaVinci Resolve has all these neat features you don’t have in FCP, so now I’m wondering what the best starting point would be for me as a beginner.
Am I the only one that thinks this a bit misleading? If you run the projects on an external (ssd) harddrive, it doesn’t use the internal ssd memory, right? Am I wrong here?
Good morning Tyler! Just got my M1 Mac, and Final cut. I've been LOVING these, but I miss the adjustment layer from premiere. Do you know or could you explain , or relate to a video that explains this? Thanks!
Adjustment layers aren't built into final cut but you can install them for free as titles, bunch of them floating around like this one th-cam.com/video/2jLPEkKmg8w/w-d-xo.html
There are adjustment layer plug ins for free online! Or just use a title from the titles section and delete the text- you can then add effects to the title that will show over what’s below
Tyler, Is it really that awful to edit photos and video on the 14" screen? I've only seen one creator prefer the 14" for this kind of work. Just curious.
I bought the entry level 14 inch, what is seriously the best video editing app? I know final cut works best with it but I want to know what’s the best out of the 3 as apps.
Could the SSD external drive be a limit factor on the playback of the timelines? What if you edited purely on the internal drive? Would that be a more smooth experience on the timeline?
@@stalman I'm assuming the drive used here was the Sandisk Extreme Portable SSD v2. Also it is not the fastest drive around, you can DIY enclosure with an NVME and get higher speeds on Thunderbolt 3 and 4.
GUYS PLS HELP! I use 10bit 4k 60fps or 5k 30fps 10bit with lots of effects and stuff. I come from an i9 32gb gtx2060 laptop and premiere choked it out o___o I sold it and am super torn between the base 14" and the 13" M1. I actually want the 13 Inch, mainly for the price and there are a lot of people saying it's definitely powerful enough. What are your guys thoughts?
I'd like to say thanks to everyone that left a positive comment on this video. It's one of the greatest forms of motivation to us as youtubers!... Content is truly hard to make. Trust me when i tell you that 😇😇
@@stalman That’s a good point Tyler, if you’re working out of your spare bedroom with a cobbled together system of hard drives and SD cards Premiere and Final Cut are fantastic. If you need an integrated system for capture, play out, automation and information management Avid thrives. Also, their free version is top notch.
You can definitely export clips from the timeline in FCPX. Happened to me by accident (I’m thinking you need to have the clips selected and then hit export?) anyway, here is a different solution: th-cam.com/video/bxTsAyfH0vs/w-d-xo.html
I have bought both licenses, I just felt that to get the same functionality out of fcp you need to buy some paid addons. And the bonus hardware speed editor for the price of the davinci license is nice. FCP wins for ease of use for sure. I am a noob with editing though, so what do I know..
By far the most common comment has been that using Resolve Studio rather than the free version would have changed the results because of it's GPU support. Hardware acceleration is only missing from the free Windows version of Resolve, on the Mac it is built in.
That would be super cool if you could compare DaVinci resolve studio versus DaVinci resolve free for these render and export times. ❤️
Don't think that's true.
@@rano12321 Yes, it's true, free only has DECODE for H.264, however, the Studio has both ENCODE and DECODE hardware acceleration for both H.264/265. There are a few other features that are only available in Studio and not the free version, but you DO get 95% of studio in the free. Good news is, a $295 or so one time payment and you get the updates, I think for life. That said, you can also buy accessories through Black Magic to help offset the software support.
@@johnhpalmer6098 Free uses gpu for output but no gpu for the timeline which studio has.
I've been using Final Cut for 6 years now, for me there was no other software that could match it, but I'm amazed on how Resolve its close to being my favorite now. And premiere.. well thanks to Premiere I dont have hair right now.
Yap I agree to that there's no need to argue or take side on which is the better/best and faster apps or a piece of tech you use. It's all about what is your preference, comfortability and needs on the apps/tech you used.
I can’t wait to get Final Cut Pro… I don’t even have a MacBook but I’m saving money to buy the MacBook Air M1 :)
I’ve used it for my channel, MacBook Air works awesome with 4K footage in final cut.
Why wait, download the free trial. ✌️
P
00
Get the pro apps package with the student discount if you are or know a student with the MacBook order, it’s the cheapest way to get it!
From what I understand you need the studio version of resolve to use GPU acceleration unless it's different with M1 so that might effect results.
Good to point out, but it is different. The GPU acceleration seems to only be on windows
@@stalman gotcha. Thanks!
Final Cut is a good reliable editor. I don’t have anything against it, but it’s limited when it comes to motion graphics, and I don’t understand why Apple can’t make it integrate better with Motion. I use Resolve because not only is it buttery smooth and fast, it’s a powerhouse when it comes to compositing and color grading. Premiere is just a dumpster fire I gave up on over a year ago because it’s too cluttered, unstable, and slow.
Final Cut is such an incredibly efficient and speedy NLE. Gotta love it 🙌
Surprising results! I’m gonna stick with FCP, just so fast and efficient with cranking through an edit
Yep
Can you edit Insta360 video in Final Cut ? Is there a plugin ?
9:40 Final Cut can totally export a clip from the timeline. We got that around 3 updates ago. You just have to select a range from the timeline with the Range tool and hit export. That way It will only export the range you selected.
I commented the same 😂
I think you misunderstand what I was saying, Resolve allows you to export all the clips in a time as new files with handles on the beginning and end. So effectively our have just the good bits and you can either bring those into another NLE or archive them. In final cut, you just have one finished clip
Divinci, and FCP smoke premier and a joy to use. FCP for me was easier to learn, but divinci is the one I wanna get better at as I get more into film making and color grading.
Same here..... Fcp is the easiest to learn
At the 8:46 mark you recommend going for the M1 Max rather than the M1 Pro for the H.264/ProRes decoders, but both chips have those decoders, it's just that the Max has double the dedicated accelerators of the M1 Pro. Great video though, somewhat surprising results.
I understood it like he meant that going for the max will give you more power for those tasks. Not that the pro can't do it.
09:44 Export individual clips in Final Cut: Just use the range tool. Just like in DVR you set the in and out points. It‘s the same.
Buuut in resolve you can export every clip on the timeline as an individual clip - great for grading and creating proxies, or for dalies exports from a DIT. Resolve is simply much better at both transcoding and exporting - which makes sense as that is it's core functionality from before it wanted to be an NLE.
You should use Resolve without screen recording. Might surprise you.
True, which is usually how I use it when I’m working 😅
@@stalman actually the biggest diference would be using the studio version. The free version does not support GPU acceleration
I find it insane that DaVinci Resolve (the free version) is beating out FCP and Premiere Pro in quite a few of these tests, that’s super impressive. I am still using the free version of Resolve (on an M1 Mac mini 16GB) and I haven’t really hit the ceiling yet (except for a few features that would be nice such as denoiser). I switched from Premiere Pro about a year ago and I honestly haven’t looked back since, great bit of software! Would be interested in seeing how well Fusion works with the M1 Pro and Max chips, as it is quite slow for most things on the M1 basic chip. Nice tests and great video, Tyler! 👌
Sarah Dietchty did a video about these machines and said the Fusion functions do not work that well with the M1 Max, that it's one of the few things that slows it down.
Hey Arran, how extensive are your edits? I use 10bit 4k 60fps or 5k 30fps 10bit. Is it powerful enough?
What files are u using with how much colour depth???
Little note. Also the scale of the window impacts timeline playback I’ve noticed.
I tend to leave mine at 50% often.
That works better than “fit”. (I mainly use premiere.)
That's a cool tip, thanks!
Really can't decide between FCP and Resolve. I have about the same amount of experience in each, but both has its pro's and con's. Really tough choice
Easy choice. Go for resolve. Way more options and overal more professional video editor. The more difficult choice would be premiere or resolve.
Thanks for the comparison. After 26 years of Premiere on Windows I ordered a Macbook M1 Pro and Final Cut.
Great video. I’m pretty sure FCP mainly uses the GPU for rendering and export. I assume that’s why the CPU’s are firing much.
Good to know, thanks Thomas! It’s hard to sus out what’s causing each difference. My next video goes in to this further
No, the special encoders for 264,265 and prores. That why their in there.
Thank you so so much for going through the stress of putting your computer through this! I did not have the patience, which is how I found you. I lowkey have a crush on you, because of your level of patience hahaha. Thanks for these comparisons.
Hey Tyler, if you could start again, would you choose the Resolve or stay with FCP? I've just ordered my first Macbook Pro. At one side I found FCP more intuitive. At the other for my hobby non-commercial use Resolve would made more sense, altough it has a steeper learn curve...
I use both for different things, but still massively prefer FCP for editing
Editing: FCP
Color Grading: Davinci
What a killer machine and FCPX FTW :) (though +1 on the export options in Resolve). As always, great video mate 👍
Thanks for the info! Congratulations on the Chanel!
Liked for that updated comparison vid 👀
Hands down Final Cut is going to perform the best, but I do think running screen recordings and running off of an external drive massively hindered the other two applications. These internal SSD's are insanely fast and definitely help with performance.
I expected it to be more hands down that it was, and working from external drives is a must for all video editors.
Also I tested the exports both on internal and external. The difference was actually pretty insignificant compared to other variables
@@stalman Gotcha! Thank you for the follow up, that’s interesting 🧐
Spoken like someone who's never used Resolve, haha.
This isn’t the studio version of the resolve, so probably not the best comparison there. If I’m not mistaken, studio has some extra encoding features as well as GPU acceleration.
Tyler replied to another viewer with a similar comment:
That version is Windows-only.
“No fans”
Just like Adobe after switching to FCPX and an M1 machine 🤠
Jokes aside, great video! I was a long time Premiere user on a custom built PC and after picking up an M1 Pro machine and swapping to FCPX, i’ll never go back. I solely edit on my Mac now and that’s coming from a hardcore windows user!
Hey Tyler, how extensive are your edits? I use 10bit 4k 60fps or 5k 30fps 10bit. Is it powerful enough?
You can export part of timeline if FC! You should choose this part by yellow markers(I don’t no correct name) and than press share (export button in right top angle)
Tyler out here doing the lords work
Good afternoon from myself in the UK. I upgraded from my M1 iMAC to the Studio M1 Ultra three months ago and just returned it yesterday to Apple after quite a few issues with it. I've just picked up the 2021 MacBook Pro M1 Max. I already use PP but I'm considerrrrrrrrringgggggg (deep breath) moving to FCP. There's a link in this video to a comparison but unfortunately its from 2019. Do you have an updated video please as since that time i'm sure both software will have improved massively. Thanks so much. Lee
Have you tried exporting with all three programs at the same time?
These new MacBook Pros really are impressive. Can't wait to see what's coming for a future Mac Pro.
I don’t even know what to ask for anymore, we got so spoiled this time
@@stalman hmm maybe 30 minute R5 or Red Raw projects that render in
Hey Tyler thank you for the video. Are using the M1 Max with 24 or 32 cores? Also, curious, 1 or 2 TB SSD?
EDIT: resolve only uses the hardware decoders in studio version, it performs a LOT better if you use the studio version
original comment:
I use final cut because the magnetic timeline makes me edit like 4x faster and I have way more fun editing
One thing I'd like to mention is that with premiere pro you can use media encoder thus allowing you to render out multiple videos at once. Other than that this is a great video
I think your title is wrong at 7:08. You said you were testing Canon Raw file playback in the other two but the title says Resolve wins at 8k Prores.
editing is so much more efficient in FCP. and besides Resolve can't use ProRES RAW (unless you do a complicated conversion) - deal breaker for me. Everything has too many options in Resolve - I'm sure that is good for some but another complication for others.
Great job man ! I found out recently about your channel through your video about grading in FCP, and subscribed immediately ! I'm a video editor (though I've recently cut an american feature film), and I've been cutting on FCP since 2013 on the same 27 inch iMac with memory 32 Gb. My computer has been struggling with dailies for a while now, and can't handle 4K smoothly, forcing me to create proxies every time. I've been contemplating buying a macbook pro M1 max - even more since I watched that video - but I'm tempted to wait for an hypothetical new iMac for even better performances. What do you think ? Anyway, keep up the great work !
Nice, please can you tell us the name of the film you cut? things like this inspire me
Thanks for the video. FCP can export part of the video - just use the range tool !
Awesome video man love your videos but Wait what camera are you using to get 8k ProRes 😓😓
I looooove that you included Canon R5 raw files on the M1 Max for these apps, can’t find this content anywhere else! Thank you!
If I’m not mistaken you said resolve wasn’t studio version. That’s really unfair comparison. There’s a huge difference between the studio and free version especially when it comes to encoders. So you probably update this video with the studio version.
Great video, thanks man!
Were you running these off an external SSD? I'm just wondering if that hurt part of the results.
It depends what machine you're using if Mac FCPX of course if windows Premier coz no FCPX in windows
Please don't use the free version of resolve with two paid software, use the studio version of Resolve while comparing. It's not just about GPU support not all codecs are supported on the free version. All the other videos I've seen resolve studio demolished both final cut and premiere on M1 max.
Awesome video! Thanks for sharing.
I use resolve for my editing, I love editing in it, and node system allows me do some complex stuff.
You made a small mistake , you didn't use studio version of resolve which means, gpu acceleration is not enabled
that's why Da vanci resolve losing here and there-Not a fair battel...(note only studio version if Da vinci resolve can utilize the gpu fully.)
Always been a premiere pro editor but might have to have a look at final cut and davinci 👀
Thanks, Cool, please try some of the less known programs.
Something to consider: the widespread use of high-quality stock footage and images is probably not doing society any favours. All those images of perfectly presented, shiny happy families laughing together may sell Coca Cola, but I think they also depress people. Everyone knows they're fake, false, insincere.
But, because we're silly chimps, we still think those fake images are aspirational.
That's really destructive.
Anyway, back to the topic at hand...
It's not that deep brudda
Resolve Studio offers GPU support. I wonder how that might skew the performance results.
Which software do you recommend for motion graphics and VFX, After Effects or Davinci Resolve Fusion?
Thank You❤️What camera Do You Use ?
DVR free version playback is not the same as the studio version. To do this comparison DaVinci Relsolve Studio version should be used to be fair.
That is true on windows, but GPU acceleration is enabled on Mac
Not bad, what is this external hard drive? An SSD?
I’m sure I’m not the only one, but resolve studio would be the best comparison, I never had a good experience with the free version, but the studio version outperforms fcpx in my experience even on an intel mac
It’s Vegas Pro
Great work! thank you.
Hey Tyler was this using the m1 optimised version of resolve or the normal mac one?
Yes, M1 optimized
@@stalman thanks for the reply Tyler, keep up the great videos.
Had a hard time finding parameters in the export comparison. What time of the video, etc. I tend to just balpark in length of time of video with length of time of export.
Everybody’s always making videos about what software is faster, what tips to make you a faster editor, do this to be faster do that to be faster… Faster faster faster. Fast has nothing to do with quality. I’m an incredibly fast editor and I could care less about being fast. I care about being good. And besides, the faster you edit the less money you make.
Being nuanced and skillful is way more important than being fast.
I hear Resolve straight up can’t handle ProRes very well. As it was seen here resolve beats the others when playing Canon RAW LT but loses ProRes even tho ProRes is easier.
not using the studio version of resolve dosent allow you to use the gpu acceleration. You only get CPU processing on the free version.
Exactly. I’m shocked he even used resolve in this test. A huge miss on his end
Yeah this is only a windows thing. Hardware acceleration is included in the free version
@@stalman interesting, I use resolve on both windows and Mac and even 10bit color files won't play in the free version on either platform.
Hey Tyler,
Do you think you could redo these test with M1 compatiable versions of Adobe Premiere?
Thank you
I think they were all up to date for M1 when I did the test, did I say otherwise in the video?
Great video! Is AVID also one of the ‘Big Video Editors’??
Very true, Avid is obviously used in the biggest productions. But it’s a lot less popular in terms of number of users
Can you export a long video while editing another one?
Hey man, what external drive do you use? Thanks in advance.
The SanDisk Extreme SSDs
@@stalman Thank you for taking the time to reply. Appreciate that a lot.
If you were just getting started, which would you choose? In the video, you said the DaVinci Resolve has all these neat features you don’t have in FCP, so now I’m wondering what the best starting point would be for me as a beginner.
It depends the path you plan to go down. Final Cut for speed, Resolve for depth
This is the first review of the many I have watched that doesn't say Resolve 18 wins hands down.
Am I the only one that thinks this a bit misleading? If you run the projects on an external (ssd) harddrive, it doesn’t use the internal ssd memory, right? Am I wrong here?
Good morning Tyler! Just got my M1 Mac, and Final cut. I've been LOVING these, but I miss the adjustment layer from premiere. Do you know or could you explain , or relate to a video that explains this? Thanks!
Adjustment layers aren't built into final cut but you can install them for free as titles, bunch of them floating around like this one th-cam.com/video/2jLPEkKmg8w/w-d-xo.html
There are adjustment layer plug ins for free online! Or just use a title from the titles section and delete the text- you can then add effects to the title that will show over what’s below
@@ryanleshock thank you!! I’ll try that out for sure!!
Tyler,
Is it really that awful to edit photos and video on the 14" screen? I've only seen one creator prefer the 14" for this kind of work. Just curious.
No it’s not awful, totally doable. I just always choose the additional room for interface elements. It’s actually more important for video than photo
5:05 it also happens to me always. if I stack a video, it never play smoothly in davinci resolve
I bought the entry level 14 inch, what is seriously the best video editing app? I know final cut works best with it but I want to know what’s the best out of the 3 as apps.
That’s my next video, coming soon
Davinci studio version is smoother than the non-studio version!
In final cut you can export individual clips, just hit the range tool (R) then drag whatever range and hit export it'll just do that section
Great video and tests always. Wish more creators would do this with the Pro chip vs max?
Resolve Life!
Could the SSD external drive be a limit factor on the playback of the timelines? What if you edited purely on the internal drive? Would that be a more smooth experience on the timeline?
I did those tests with FCP specially and there was only a negligible impact. Plus this is how editors work, this drive is as fast as they get
@@stalman I'm assuming the drive used here was the Sandisk Extreme Portable SSD v2. Also it is not the fastest drive around, you can DIY enclosure with an NVME and get higher speeds on Thunderbolt 3 and 4.
Video start from here 8:18
Ha! Some guys on russian youtube gave advices like"Editing in Davicni is cool and professional "
NIX-CE
GUYS PLS HELP! I use 10bit 4k 60fps or 5k 30fps 10bit with lots of effects and stuff. I come from an i9 32gb gtx2060 laptop and premiere choked it out o___o I sold it and am super torn between the base 14" and the 13" M1. I actually want the 13 Inch, mainly for the price and there are a lot of people saying it's definitely powerful enough. What are your guys thoughts?
@Anticipate Media Thanks a lot!
I'd like to say thanks to everyone that left a positive comment on this video. It's one of the greatest forms of motivation to us as youtubers!... Content is truly hard to make. Trust me when i tell you that 😇😇
I want that shirt.
I'm wondering why AVID Media Composer isn't mentioned seeing that it's the preeminent editing system across the planet?
It’s used in the biggest projects but by the fewest people
@@stalman That’s a good point Tyler, if you’re working out of your spare bedroom with a cobbled together system of hard drives and SD cards Premiere and Final Cut are fantastic. If you need an integrated system for capture, play out, automation and information management Avid thrives. Also, their free version is top notch.
Why only 360K sub ? why ? 🙁
why prores, try h264 and then see
You can definitely export clips from the timeline in FCPX. Happened to me by accident (I’m thinking you need to have the clips selected and then hit export?) anyway, here is a different solution: th-cam.com/video/bxTsAyfH0vs/w-d-xo.html
Free version of davinci doesn’t use hardware encoding. You need studio to use all your hardware!
That’s the case on PC but on Mac the free version does support it
Wow, i'll be using davinci for sure
Obvio FCP because it's optimized for mac
WOW
Was my comment deleted because I said davinci is a better deal and comes with the free speed editor? I use them both.
Nope, I didn’t see your comment or delete anything
@@stalman you didnt strike me as someone that would mind a comment like that, I wonder if its automated.
I have bought both licenses, I just felt that to get the same functionality out of fcp you need to buy some paid addons. And the bonus hardware speed editor for the price of the davinci license is nice. FCP wins for ease of use for sure. I am a noob with editing though, so what do I know..
It's personal
So evident your crush on FCP ;)
lool u had to use the stuio version of resolve as the free version is limited in perfomance
Yes, on the PC. The Mac version does not have the same hardware acceleration restrictions
👍
also on the m1 max 64 gb... I haven't been happy with PPRo in years. But the legacy projects keep me in the system. Maybe someday I can switch to FCP