Mesh Analysis Example-Everything Part 2

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ม.ค. 2012
  • Mesh analysis with independent and dependent current and voltage sources. Part 2. More instructional engineering videos can be found at www.engineeringvideos.org.
    This video is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license creativecommons.org/licenses/b....

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @playuhh
    @playuhh 11 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    i1 = 0.473A
    i2 = -0.827A
    i3 = -1.722A
    i4 = 2.709A
    Source: RREF Matrix on Ti-84

  • @eipiplusone3791
    @eipiplusone3791 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot for these videos!

  • @naturefo2
    @naturefo2 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    a~~0.47257 and b~~-0.82700 and c~~-1.7215 and d~~2.7089

  • @MrDlbonano
    @MrDlbonano 11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I1 = .47, i2 = -0.826, i3 = -1.7215, i4 = 2.708. Great video u just made a mistake by making the last equation to be 20i1 instead of -60i1

  • @DarrylMorrell
    @DarrylMorrell  12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @acer57, @stephenxluo
    Actually, I believe stephenxluo is correct that the voltage should be negative. The polarity of VB is defined so that I1-I4 flows from positive to negative, and I1-I4 is negative, so the voltage is negative. (This is what I have written, but I reversed it when doing the computation.) I will add an annotation to the video correcting this. Thanks for finding it.

  • @kishorek9410
    @kishorek9410 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    mesh 4 current is wrong instead of -60i u solved as 20i

  • @johnnolen8338
    @johnnolen8338 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mr. Morrell:
    There is a mistake in your equation for Mesh 4. Should be: -60*I1 + 40*I4 = 80.

  • @mnada72
    @mnada72 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @acer57
    @acer57 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @stephenxluo because you take your leading current wich is the higher in magnitude and then you substract (BIGGER - smaller) which in this case is (1.9-.19)(40) = 68

  • @DarrylMorrell
    @DarrylMorrell  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are correct. I have updated the annotations to show this. This is why I really don't like mesh analysis...

  • @aashalash40
    @aashalash40 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    i know this is old but im using my ti84plus to solve the systems of equations and im getting a different answer, this works with 3 equations up to I3 for me but wont work for this, please help.

  • @johnwang3293
    @johnwang3293 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where did he get 0.559 from from the equation Vb = 40(0.559-2.709)?? did he make another mistake?

  • @shaonjunior8894
    @shaonjunior8894 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    how can i calculate this linear equation without wolframalpha? i want to calculate myself and with fx991MS calculator plz help

    • @TheChristopherVEVO
      @TheChristopherVEVO 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Linear algebra, thats why its necessary in engineering
      there are various ways, you can search for cramers formula, and Gauss Jordan

  • @musicismyfuel4085
    @musicismyfuel4085 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    well not exactly everything...you could have thrown in dependent current sources as well.

  • @jesusalvarezfebres6592
    @jesusalvarezfebres6592 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the last equation should be I1(-40+20)+I4 (40)=80.

  • @atmsc4nd4l
    @atmsc4nd4l 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    your answers are wrong. i solved it in manual calculations. the correct answers are:
    I1 = 0.473A
    I2 = -0.827A
    I3 = -1.722A
    I4 = 2.709A
    simulate first before making video so you can verify if your answers are correct. well anyways, great video. just need some editing to make it right.

  • @MrDlbonano
    @MrDlbonano 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bro you made a mistake