Introduction to Superposition

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ม.ค. 2012
  • Introduces the principle of superposition. More instructional engineering videos can be found at www.engineeringvideos.org.
    This video is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license creativecommons.org/licenses/b....

ความคิดเห็น • 51

  • @atenakitabi3769
    @atenakitabi3769 9 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    watch this video with 1.25 times speed. saves a lot of time.!

    • @christiancaldwell9805
      @christiancaldwell9805 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nah man, 1.5 is better
      ....No!
      Screw it! 2 Times!
      Try and stop me suckers!

    • @NJLStudios1
      @NJLStudios1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bih im considering 2x

    • @phillipmhundwa642
      @phillipmhundwa642 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@NJLStudios1 4x worked well for me

  • @DrJosh-zp8xe
    @DrJosh-zp8xe 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    "any voltage or current in a circuit is the sum of the voltage/current due to each individual independent source alone"
    in case anyone wanted that written out for them

  • @2012javad
    @2012javad 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    thank god, there is an english video on the subject!!

  • @eissa.f
    @eissa.f ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These guys talking about you talking so slow are ungrateful and disrespectful..
    You have mellow way of teaching which makes the topics much easier

  • @bandaralhazemi7751
    @bandaralhazemi7751 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Man, you make it look easy. Thanks a lot.

  • @doktoren99
    @doktoren99 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cheers man. This is real great! :)

  • @zachary811
    @zachary811 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The current 'I' we are solving for can be anywhere in the circuit can the method still applies?

  • @DavidDolynny
    @DavidDolynny 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the excellent Videos

  • @themexicannon
    @themexicannon 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To calculate I', the current source is replaced. Current sources are replaced by an open circuit (break in the wire), leaving just the two resistors in series with the 6v voltage source.
    To calculate I'', the voltage source is replaced. Voltage sources are replaced by a short circuit (wires connected together), leaving the two resistors in parallel with the 3A current source.
    It might help you to redraw the circuit after each substitution to see the arrangement more clearly.

  • @wasifShikder
    @wasifShikder 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    could you please explain why I=0A, how does this make sense?
    Thanks!!!

  • @Azza_00022
    @Azza_00022 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank You Sir

  • @shareef3743
    @shareef3743 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you sir!

  • @paderp1528
    @paderp1528 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    PRIME INSTRUCTIONS. Thanx! :D

  • @burakayan1429
    @burakayan1429 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you sensei

  • @parvez9126
    @parvez9126 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    effective video....!!!!

  • @brettcecere1815
    @brettcecere1815 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    For I'' (eye double prime), why is the -3 Amps negative?

  • @tanvirbinazam2569
    @tanvirbinazam2569 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why I' =6*2/(2+4)=2 according to my view and current divider rule not 1 amper .Please explain.

    • @thulungsystems
      @thulungsystems 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      current divider does not work in series resistors. you are mixing the formula

  • @AbirHasanDipu
    @AbirHasanDipu 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks :)

  • @md.rashidulislamimran2833
    @md.rashidulislamimran2833 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @nathanoosterhuis6232
    @nathanoosterhuis6232 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like your raspy voice. nice vid.

  • @ShaneClough
    @ShaneClough 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't understand why superposition needed to be used to solve this circuit. Initially, couldn't you tell that all 6V would be used up by the 2ohm resistor only? No current would flow through the path with the 4 ohm resistor because the path parallel to it (the one with the 3A supply) has 0 ohm resistance, therefore making it a short circuit?

  • @rominadoubnia742
    @rominadoubnia742 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isnt I prime - I double prime?

  • @valflyinf
    @valflyinf 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's probably too late but see that in I', the current source BECOMES AN OPEN. in I'', the voltage source BECOMES A SHORT.

  • @MrC77
    @MrC77 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is I'' negative?

  • @junkdogg1
    @junkdogg1 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought the reciprocal rule was used with resistors in parallel!!

    • @casualcompetitors2236
      @casualcompetitors2236 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      junkdogg1 he didnt use the reciprocal rule, he used current division

    • @IamChandEvil
      @IamChandEvil 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Casual Competitors isn't current division in parallel too?

    • @IamChandEvil
      @IamChandEvil 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      junkdogg1 my bad, i realised the resistors are in parallel. They are only in series when the current source is missing

    • @junkdogg1
      @junkdogg1 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only one voltage source, so it should be 1amp for this circuit

  • @alexanderjack5937
    @alexanderjack5937 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have explained really well but you're to slow which made the explanation kind of poring.

    • @alexanderjack5937
      @alexanderjack5937 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      In other word this basic video didn't save my time.

    • @paderp1528
      @paderp1528 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Well i'd rather spend 9 mins with this sir then 20mins trying to decipher my text book!

    • @atenakitabi3769
      @atenakitabi3769 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Abdullah EE watch with 1.25 times speed, saves time, (;

  • @junkdogg1
    @junkdogg1 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is only one voltage source so this is not superposition

    • @nolios.
      @nolios. 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +junkdogg1 But a current source can also be a voltage source if you use source transformation so yeah this is superposition

  • @kristofferpresthaug8018
    @kristofferpresthaug8018 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    you.. eehm.. talk.. uhmm.. sooo.. uhm.. slooow

  • @baglagab
    @baglagab 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    OMG you talk soooo slow. I should just change my speed from .5 to normal

  • @shix1Resolve
    @shix1Resolve 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oooooh Myyyyyyy Goooooooood,
    you talk so slow, video could be half the size

  • @blazingfire7517
    @blazingfire7517 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok wrong type of superpositions. Should've searched quantum superpositions.

  • @avinashreddy9556
    @avinashreddy9556 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Dude first learn how to talk

    • @neelparekh3448
      @neelparekh3448 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow, the way you're saying that, it really seems like you can do a better job. Lets see you explain it then...