Love, Belief, and Neurobiology of Attachment

In this Loma Linda video, Paul J. Zak, founding director of the Center for Neuroeconomics Studies at Claremont Graduate University, gives a scientific twist on the topics of attachment and trust. By looking into the geographical and biological aspects of human trust, Zak presents an engaging conversation into how trust affects our behaviors, from our social interactions with strangers to peoples relationships with God and religion.

[@flowewritharoma]

great man

[@Light4rmLove]

@Lubziw perhaps trusting people are less corrupt - and those less trusting have lost their "innocence" due to negative life experiences (a cup half empty or half full theory). You have a point; but it's quite vague and generalising. There are many trusting carefree individuals who give the benefit of the doubt - and perhaps don't allow the "doubt" part to negatively imprint their life......

[@Lubzi]

@light4rmLove we can maintain innocence and use good judgement at the same time, can't we. My objection is to the conclusion he jumped to.

[@RipTheJackR]

@conzatorium
I know its 1 year late, BUT, well, if you WANT to trust someone, then there is prolly oxytocin or other features making you inclined to think so, i guess thats the problem around it, when people would have much better outcomes IF they were inclined to trust vs the postulated state of non-trust.

[@rmerkle1]

Please TH-cam "True Theory of Everything Quadrant Model of Reality 1" for the theory of everything. Thank you.

[@Lubzi]

I think he jumps to a big conclusion from trust to: 'Belief in God is physically built in' . People who are very trusting are easier to influence. They are more likely to believe in the religion they were raised to follow by their society.

[@leica0000]

This could have been good but it is religious. Not everyone believes in god, nor should they.

[@texugonervoso]

"I think that men has been testosterone poisoned..." LOL.

[@wkdzairi]

dumbest question ever.