ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
- All Endings in Sams Story Metro Exodus. I really hope they make a new metro game, DLC's were a little short but still good.
Subscribe ➜ bit.ly/2TsLCVJ
► Use Creator Code: xGarbett
►Become a Member (Works on Mobile): bit.ly/2NQ6EHC
● Twitter: / xgarbett
● Discord: / discord
● Facebook: / xgarbett
● Twitch: / xgarbett
● Website: xgarbett.com/
![ผัวเถื่อน - ยูริ โตเกียวมิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P08ORRVDGl8/mqdefault.jpg)
The good ending is obviously to destroy the submarine and prevent a mad war buisnessman controlling the world.
But he could have destroyed the submarine after arriving to the destination lol.
@Lord Admiral Spiremaybe only because of his nostalgy of American people and because he has no other choice ?
@@Gaming4LifeFR that "mad men" is trustable enough that crews of the submarine work for him even when they still respect the old captain and still act normally
And Tom also try to get rid of Klim, the real sociopath in his team instead of every nice and reasonable dude
sam was injured and in home ending, remote fell off his hand into the sea
Nah during the radio talk Tom caught on so he wouldve been disarmed as soon as he was in the sub so dont think its gonna happen
They would discover the explosive by that time. Tom will also ask what the Captain was talking about. No other choice.
I feel bad for sam all he wants to do is go home.
People who got 2nd ending :
Tom is a good guy would never do anything wrong.
Meanwhile Mad Lad Tom literally puts a Pirate black flag on his Nuclear submarine.
putting any other flag would result in coming under fire as soon as anyone spots him because russian subs are still lurking in the ocean
@@yosefyonin6824 submarines dont look at flags...
@@yosefyonin6824 after 23 years is even there anyone left to fire at them?
At such point to talk about "Russia" or the "United States" is meaningless, both have ceased to exist as entities at that point, just like the rest of the nation states in the world.
It is just like Fallout, after the apocalypse new states will born while the old ones already have fallen into the trashcan of history like many others had done in the past, like Rome, Phoenicia, Aztec empire, etc.
@@carlosdgutierrez6570 there is no knowing what's out there so it's better to be safe and have a neutral flag
@@yosefyonin6824 Pirate flag isnt neutral one. There are other flags. Plus if you encounter enemy who has firepower to harm you and attitude to fire instantly on percieved enemy (you/country flag), he would for sure fire on "pirate ship" too so that wouldnt help you at all.
1:48 this is why you never give the bad guy any room to breathe. Fill him with led first chance you have!
I agree completely.😆
Don't even give them the chance to sneak attack you!
@@ezra4374 I agree shoot them on the spot
I got the first ending. I liked that both endings were bitter-sweet.
The san francisco ending wasn't bittersweet - it was psychopathic and selfish.
@@Martial-Mat "it was psychopathic and selfish."
How so?
@@YungBeezer psycho dont get it either but selfish maybe is because sam only cared about himself getting home, despite the consequences it would bring if tom had the submarine, and most importantly his friends of the order fought for the ppl and their safety even if they could´ve left them behind (which ik they kinda did it in the main story but they said they will get them out of moscu) but he chose to endanger other ppl by giving a business man nuclear weapons only to get home
@@thebonicecyc8841 tom only want finding one piece, what selfish about that, he could just left sam there and doing his overlord game, tom is trushable
Call me an idiot, but if it's a remote detonator, why not take the trip home and then flip the kill switch? You get to go home and still stop the sociopath, what's there to lose that way?
The Captain could have just waited till Sam got home then tell him to fulfill his wish. Then Tom wouldn’t be as suspicious.
Personally i think the correct ending is blowing up the sub
but i like how the game will just let you have any of the endings without beeing the "bad ending" really, its up for the player to decide, the game clearly goes along with either choice
To also be fair the games also establish that in Metro 2033 you're supposed to choose the bad ending (destroy the Botanical Gardens) and in Metro Last Light you are meant to get the good ending because if you do not get the good ending Artyom doesn't survive D2. Nor would he survive Novosibirks (Dead City) in the finale of Metro Exodus as it was the Dark Ones who showed Miller where to find Artyom.
I read the books, then I played the games, and then I downloaded Sam's story and I feel as if they made it just for me.
what is the good ending?
@@OsinakiKun there are no "good" or "bad" endling for Sam. They both have their very own point
according to the devs themselves the ending in which sam leaves russia with tom is classified as the good ending and other bad
any citations plz
@@yosefyonin6824 the cutscene files in the game directory are labeled as such
well thats really stupid considering both are moraly ambigious.
And you easily believed into that?
Why then if player hasn't done any of Captain's requests you would automatically get the ending where Sam goes to USA. Giving automatically "good" ending for nothing, eh? Something wrong here, don't you think? May be because it's just working name of the files. If you scan soundtrack of the game, you will see that most of the tracks are not named by their proper name as well too, for example.
When the developers make such stories where you can't easily say what's "right" or "wrong", you would barely get the proper answer what is "good". Cause no good/bad decisions here. Just choices and consequences - and that's it.
Only if delevolopers gives interview about that and adding what their team considered to be canon ending or smth like that.
In Sam's story all the choice is up to the player.
As this story contains(though it should be presented better) the main theme "the person i wants to be" vs "the person i used to be".
Buuuuuuuuullshit. Sam would never allow Tom to kill people with nukes just so he could go home. I don't believe that at all.
Imagine an ink spots song starting up and the glow of a pip-boy
If you are really playing as Canon Sam, He'd blow the sub, He wouldn't have nuclear pirate attacks on his conscience. There will be other ships and hopefully other games
Maybe but he is too a man who has awaited half of his life to return to home, stopped only by his debt with Miller after he saved him from being lynched and the idea pushed by the metro leaders that everybody outside the metro is gone.
After Miller's death and the realization that life beyond the metro still exists he can change, he would change specially after having his dream of returning home within the grasp of his fingers.
There's also the fact that during a nuclear ravaged world, the ocean at Vladivostok level, and north of that, can freeze over similarly to how it did when the native Americans got to America a long time ago, and he can walk/drive over
I always wondered : The power factions in Moscow firmly believe that the Soviet Union had been hit far worse in the nuclear exchange of 2013 than NATO countries were, right ? Thats why they kept silent, pretending Moscow was dead as they feared renewed nuclear strikes by an enemy still absolutely capable to do so. They even feared that the country was at least partially occupied by NATO. They must have had at least some solid evidence for that. Then why is a missile sub potentionally still carrying hundreds of nuclear warheads allowed to enter and just sit in the harbor of Vladivostok, for decades, without getting nuked as soon as it was discovered on satellite imagery ? If remnants of the Soviet military, like the recon base at the Caspian Sea were still capable of satellite reconnaissance...then a much less devastated NATO must have this capability and more aswell. They cannot know if the sub is still armed, nor who is or will be in control of it. Why do they accept this massive threat without acting against it ? Maybe there is a cease fire in effect, which nobody in Moscow knows about ? I hope Dmitry Glukhovsky will give us answers at some point. :-)
Well it's Russia not the USSR but yeah that's interesting
@@CrazyAlaskanCoDShot I believe that in the Metro Universe, the USSR still existed in 2013
I'm pretty sure this NATO boogieman paranoia was concocted by the moscow watchers to keep the populace under control and themselves in charge
The world outside of russia is just as devastated, as can be seen in the 2nd ending
It kinda weird that they saw light and immediately went "nato still exists" do they realize how much fire nuclear weapons create?
No, the metro "invisible watchers" or the unified metro command pretended that the war still was going on to kept the factions leaders like Miller, Moskvin, the Fuhrer, etc., from revolting and compliant to kept the metro population under control but the invisible watchers well fully aware that the USA, Russia, and the rest of governments were long gone, they only kept the facade of the Russian Federal government still existing as a mean to kept their own power and lord over the whole metro.
What the hell i don't even remember having a choice it just went to the second ending instantly
You have to lower your weapon instantly when you meet the Captain first time and you have to setup his traps, when you leave his base. I think both of this is required for the Captain to completly trust you.
@@HerrFenrisWolf you can also find bodies of his crew for extra trust and you get achievement but lowering weapon, giving him food and arming traps is enough for good ending
@@Extreme96PL bad ending*
@@podroznikzpustkowi4805 game considers it good ending
@@HerrFenrisWolf no need to setup the traps, i didnt and still got the switch
brah, next metro in san francisco? hell yeah id take that any day, but its also interesting what happens back at the lake and how will artyom and his order try to save more people and make a true colony
both are interesting but id lean on sam, since 4th game back in russia and potentially back in tunnels? idk lets move the plot
Sure is Artyom not dead now
The mess in america is too easy but the mess in russia, even a conflict began
I wouldn't mind to become pirate with submarines .
Maybe america is the next location for Metro? Dlcs often have the next location for any game. For metro America maybe where the next metro will be
There is already a Metro America, It's called fallout, get your head out your ass
@@nikita-fm7ij why the sudden aggression?
@@justanapple472 raaaaggggeeee
@@nikita-fm7ij ok 👍
I'd love to see more of California maybe even up in BC.
Man I wish even a slight bit of the dlc took place in America, even a nice epilogue mission where you walk up to Sam's Dad's house. A small glimpse of Metro America would be cool.
Tom was a Good Guy 👍 I like the 2nd ending...once he made a Promise and A Deal....You can really 💯 for sure be assured he'd keep his promise...👍
He is a power hungry person, he put a pirate flag up on a nuclear sub, that's a bad ending
@@TheShadowFox1 pirate flag also represents denial of authority and complete independence. One thing is clear, Tom is a man of his word. He could easily kill Sam or simply leave him behind. At no point in story he was portrayed as a bad guy. Village thrived under his rule, he treated people fairly well, if you listen to dialogues in the Market at the beginning. He could easily be like Baron or Silantiy in the main game, but he wasn't. I actually believe that he genuenly wants to rebuild the world as it was, because it's simply good for buisness to have many "thriving" colonies. Captain himself many times says that he is kinda OK with Tom, and it's Klim who bothers him.
Also, it's completely possible and even likely, that there are dozens of functioning submarines and warships left in the world, and who knows who owns them. So having one at least neutral guy with power like this is kinda good thing.
@@kakhakheviashvili6365 "complete independence" in dead world. Independence from what?
It's bad ending. Black Flag means that Tom started use sub to murder people and rob ships. In the cut scene, you can see a burning ship.
And Sam in this ending justifies the killing of people and the use of nuclear weapons with his ghostly dream of meeting his father.
He calls the world a corpse, which can no longer be resurrected, which can no longer be helped. And so you can do whatever you want. But this idea contradicts the entire Metro series, where the idea is that the world will not die, that you cannot continue to wage war, that you cannot continue to destroy each other. But this is exactly what the submarine is doing.
Note, he says that he had friends in Moscow, although he was a stranger to them, and now when he met Tom he became a real stranger without friends.
Then the question arises why he went home at all? A dream is a dream, but only his dream is really not feasible. His father is one hundred percent dead, and all the people to whom he was close and dear are now on Lake Baikal. In America, no one needs him and knows no one. It is clear that he will never meet his father, either in the first or in the second endings. But in the second, he acted as a Spartan, he saved people that would be terrorized by this submarine in the future. He still lives with the ghostly idea of meeting his father, but his hands are not stained with blood.
@@8O0Aa.1q3S0. The burning ships are klim and bandits'.....
Also Tom is never portrayed as the bad guy in the game. Just listen to the conversations in the market. People are following him by their own will, even before the submarine is functional
@@happymogu6772 Tom is a businessman, no more - he invite Sam in the team, cause Sam is a special forces soldier, that is great deal.
Where's bad ending and where's good ending tell me guys where
Alexander Elias Sebastian there is no good or bad ending. Both endings are just a reflection of the players morality and decisions. However, the second ending is the best one in my opinion.
@@jakebooth658 like how
@@jakebooth658 I think he's asking how he can get either of them
In one you destroy a submarine that i armed with nuclear missiles but in second you are finally home after 20years but after some time i realised that second was the good one especially concidering you can not get the world even worse with extra nukes ... already filled with radiation pockets of land mutants canibals fanatics slavers gangs bandits etc...
There isn't one really. In one ending you can blow up the sub because it has nuclear weapons and there is a possibility that the captain will fire them (but that seems really unlikely) the other ending you don't and sam gets a ride back to America
I got Sam home ❤️
Sam going to America and join brotherhood of steel. The end
finally a video that says "all endings" instead of "good" or "bad" endings
i hate it when people only seem to categorize endings as "good" or "bad". it should never be so binary because if you were convinced that there was a good and bad ending and nothing in between of course you want to go with the good ending
The cinematics of the endings on the game files are called bad ending and good ending
@@lichtumbra349 I don’t care in the slightest what anything is called in the game files unless I’m a some sort of file diggger
I guess sams story is really on perspective on which is the good or bad ending
The entire time I kept asking myself "why not just irreversibly disable the missles / warheads?". Seems like a pretty big plot hole to me
To quote the captain of another Typhoon class sub. “ Hey, Ryan, be careful what you shoot at. Most things in here don't react too well to bullets.“
@@Cpt_Boony_Hat hmmmmmmm
Because you can't just take apart a nuke with no equipment. I don't care how much radiation there was in novisibirsk or the secret submarine facility where you got the fuel rods.
You are DEAD if you take apart a nuke. Also, Tom wants the nukes to "hold the world hostage with a nuclear gun" so he can start his own government and regime.
i only go for 2nd ending, i have no right to stop a man dream finding one piece
I like that the DLC doesnt have a clear-cut good or bad ending, but I still think that destroying the sub is better. Think about it. In the ending where they get to San Fransico, Sam calls the world a corpse. There's nothing left to save, and no reason to work for something better. Doesnt that entirely go against the lessons of the main game? The whole story of the main game is that the world is *not* dead, and that it *is* worth saving. If Sam goes to San Fransico, Miller (and maybe Artyom) died for nothing.
And what about Tom? Do you really think he fully understands the gravity of wielding nukes? These are the weapons that ended the world, and he's waving them around as a show of force. He was an arms dealer before the war, he already doesnt value human life. Klim might be responsible for the atrocities Tom's faction committed, but Tom still signed off on it all and profited from it regardless. Even without using the nukes, whats stopping Tom from becoming the next Baron? Not much. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and what little conscience Tom has will be eroded away eventually. If Sam lets Tom go, the problems that caused the Last War will persist, and things will only get worse. The Captain, Miller, and Klebnikov all understood that.
Nuclear Pirates, now there is a game I'd like to see
At least Tom kept his words, the whole game i genuinely thought he would just back stab you, turns out the dude was just super idealistic
I hope they'll make another DLC or another sequel where, depending on the ending you choose, Sam's story will continue.
There are some games where if you'll just keep the data of your game, you'll be able to continue where you left off. Or if it's not applicable, then default new game will be continuation for blowing up the sub. Once completed, then an alternative new game option will be available for the alternative ending in Sam's Story.
For the blowing up the sub: Sam will continue his journey looking for another way home and will eventually meet his old guys back again and this time seeing Artyom's face and him talking. Then when he gets back to America, he'll discover that his dad was already in the grave. Died because similar to Russia, factions of greedy group are fighting and taking resources to innocent people. In the end, he will be successful killing the primary faction/kingpin but will also die because of fatal wounds. Cutscene where in his funeral, he'll be honored a heroic soldier with gun salute.
For not blowing up the sub: Will just continue to be in America, a revelation what happened to Ed, the captain. Is he still alive and what did Tom do to him when they discovered the bomb despite the switch is no longer with Sam? This time, he'll meet his dad but will die along the way because of some fight as mentioned. Then Ed will continue to live in America but still holding a grudge against Tom. And Tom, being a "businessman", will sell his nuclear warheads or will have a battle about it and Sam and Ed will be fighting them. Same ending but Ed will live in the end and Sam will die. Sam will still have his funeral with gun salute, and with Ed in the crowd giving respect to him.
Edit: I just finished the previous game Metro 2033 and Metro Last Light. The story of the Dark Ones wasn't mentioned in this game, Metro Exodus.
So just to be clear, with the "good" ending, if Sam just turned around and walked away when he first met the Captain, the Captain, all of Tom and Klim's men, and all the bandits would still be alive, and the sub would be no greater threat. So Sam just killed several hundred people for no reason. And that's the "moral" choice?
Tom is a man of vision
I choose 2nd Option For Sam To Get Home . That why we worked so damn hard in the beginning of Sam's story . Was to Get Him HOME TO FIND HIS FATHER🇺🇸
2nd ending is better simply because it's sunny. And you are standing proud. 1st is just death and cold.
Yea I came to watch the ending because I fragged myself on accident at the end of the fuel rod mission and it started me back at the zip line so... no thanks
Yea, well I'm not you sam and after that godawful check point you'll never make it home on my game, goodnight and good luck GFY
So when u destroy sub he goes to u.s anyway
well realistically, theres clearly other boats around, so if he was able to get his hands on enough fuel, food, and a couple people for help he could theoretically cross the sea. I mean, the colonists got to America on sailboats for pete's sake
@@Edmar_Fecler there is a guy on youtube who sailed the Pacific Ocean in a small sailboat. California to Hawaii
Lol golden gate bridge 😯
Actually, if you pay attention to the story halfway to the game you'll hear a story about a mysterious plane flying through the sky on the vladivoska on the south, one of the guy's names Kozch (Sniper) had seen it while on the sea as huge plane (AC-130 perhaps) run-pass above them and nobody believes him. If you think of Sam not having to push the button I think he will for me but that does not mean his options are zero in, after all in the ending he did say He will find a way and the south might where he goes and story for another sequel.
This man could have just got the ride all the way back and than blew it up
Imagine we pick up where Sam is in America in the subways or in the city’s an American metro story
Fallout :P
sadly there's not much for the US in that case due to the car-centric nature of the US lol
How in the world the good ending is the bad one, and the bad one isn't the good one?
So in good ending you kill Tom, who trusted you, and an entire crew, just because the captain is paranoid because of another nuclear war in an already damned world, which tbh, it wouldn't make any sense to nuke an already nuked world, but in bad ending you will have all alive, and you will even go home.
Bad ending = good ending.
The next metro should have Sam as the main character getting across America to see his dad
But he is in CA and his dad is in CA?
@@willskidman California big