A Quick Instruction of the AutoPulse

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ค. 2024
  • This video reviews the basic function of the AutoPulse. Please keep comments constructive and respective.

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @JennyGDelp
    @JennyGDelp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    My first code involved this device. I’ll never forget that sound and the fact that the device was pressing down so hard that it looked like the patient was being pressed into the floor.

  • @pamelafischer1843
    @pamelafischer1843 12 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Really well done and so easy to follow. Clear and concise. Thank you.

  • @alkazar625
    @alkazar625 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My mother died from cardiac arrest. They used this exact machine.

  • @arwen4161
    @arwen4161 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It’s so weird, unfortunately I’ve had CPR in the past, I don’t remember anything about what happened but I recognize this sound… they used this device on me, it broke some of my ribs on my backside but I made it at least. They had to do CPR multiple times for 3 days so I guess the doctors were very happy they had this device!

    • @timd7043
      @timd7043 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad you're still with us friend

  • @BlueJFilms
    @BlueJFilms  11 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Manual compressions are good, but people get tired and machines do not. Scientific studies have shown wonderful results in increased perfusion when using tools like these.

  • @kimmycoombe
    @kimmycoombe 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The recording at the beginning is a show called Rescue 911. Used to be my favorite show!

  • @BlueJFilms
    @BlueJFilms  11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It does not complicate defibrillation. The pads should always be attached before the autopulse is placed. There is an easy located pause button when you choose to defibrilate.

  • @BigMacBraaap
    @BigMacBraaap 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "Hi! I've got my BSI on!"
    Ah, EMS school/skills.

  • @hectorconcepcion5777
    @hectorconcepcion5777 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thanks for your help.

  • @BlueJFilms
    @BlueJFilms  11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    There always is a possibility of breaking ribs. Manual CPR breaks ribs, but you are right on...I would rather live too.

  • @TTtintumon
    @TTtintumon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u so much. I was looking for this video.

  • @hadjsalemhazem4464
    @hadjsalemhazem4464 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for the video 👍🏻😊

  • @SnappingTurtle801
    @SnappingTurtle801 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah, I answered my own question much later after telling a relative about it.....lol. But thanks for answering me. :)

  • @user-ie7qr4du2h
    @user-ie7qr4du2h 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can i get one for me iwant buy it

  • @alainoortgiesen2364
    @alainoortgiesen2364 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In Holland we've got the LUCAS cpr device, what do you think is better?

    • @novacolonel8458
      @novacolonel8458 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      LUCAS is smaller and easier I think

    • @fabriziodisipio3294
      @fabriziodisipio3294 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      autopulse is better because compressions are more phisiological for heart contractility (it calculates patient chest impedence giving a perfect compression) and not dangerous for chest (while piston driven often breaks sternum. Even if it's heavier than Lucas, it's the only mechanical CPR device that can be used in movement and vertical, also with winch during rescues by Helicopter

    • @traumajock
      @traumajock 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lucas, by a long shot.

  • @user-yb3uz8pt7d
    @user-yb3uz8pt7d 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good!!

  • @ForeignerD
    @ForeignerD 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is so freaking cool. Any companies use these in NYC? I've only known Bay Ridge Volunteer Ambulance Corps to carry the hardware around on rigs.

  • @HuyPham-fu2ix
    @HuyPham-fu2ix 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much does Lucas cost?

    • @andretoney5441
      @andretoney5441 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the Lucas is $15,000. How much is the Autopulse??
      thats the question.

    • @errhka
      @errhka 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I remember it being about 12k, could be more

  • @grbrfamily
    @grbrfamily 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very professional.. I hope Shark Tank is watching.

  • @officerjen4428
    @officerjen4428 ปีที่แล้ว

    ベルトは単回使用なのか?

  • @isabelsummers8017
    @isabelsummers8017 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I more video on Heath

  • @davef3826
    @davef3826 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    that looks like that would break your ribs but I rather have that and live

  • @hill161
    @hill161 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    ouch

  • @canogutlut690
    @canogutlut690 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😮jjiohuuu

  • @user-os3sb9os4j
    @user-os3sb9os4j 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:50

  • @nycemschristopher116
    @nycemschristopher116 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi I am a fooooool

  • @leohardtvii5715
    @leohardtvii5715 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Having this kind of technology is great but we still need to know how to perform CPR in a custom way. During the worst case scenario. Talent and skill does not grow using a technology. You can't even have those in the middle of nowhere. But that tech still have better advantage during or nearby cities.

  • @dr.brentreichsbauerm.d.3247
    @dr.brentreichsbauerm.d.3247 ปีที่แล้ว

    I honestly prefer the LUCAS device over the AutoPulse, the AutoPulse is simply overpriced, the machine itself costs $931, and the Life Bands cost $100 and are only one patient use, while on the other hand the LUCAS is $16,000, which sounds like a lot, but is a one time payment, if use the AutoPulse for about a year it'll most likely reach the price of the LUCAS if not more.

  • @butterflyforeve
    @butterflyforeve 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think the Lucas is better

  • @bigvic22sti
    @bigvic22sti 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it safe to test this on live humans. There is another video on here where they show this.

  • @SnappingTurtle801
    @SnappingTurtle801 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    That seems worse then manual compressions. Why would this be needed instead?

  • @brianheisler4115
    @brianheisler4115 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Autopulse is trash, Lucas for life 💯

  • @dezjackson1
    @dezjackson1 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Doesn't seem to be very environmental friendly.
    Though it can save lives...