Why would an all-powerful all-knowing deity be threatened by a three story tall building? But according to the fairy tales, he was. He must have been PISSED when we went to the moon.
AI is not intelligence dummy. Its a database that you query by questions. Its not AI. no such thing. Only God can create thinking creatures with consciousness. And you keep try to dis Him its gonna be an ugly day for you one day. You WILL NOT go to paradise where KOOLAID thinks this place is.
This would prove that man is a better creator than god. Our human bodies are horrible if we were made by an omniscient all powerful creator, but make sense if we are products of evolution.
I am not religious but our human bodies are quite magnificent, extremely adaptable and autopoietic, it doesn't just makes sense, it's quite fascinating how it works.
I think believing that technological advancement like AI could hold a candle to an all-powerful beings creation of human sentience itself after the universe / multiverse. Would be the definition of man's hubris. 😂 We haven't even figured out what lays beneath 80% of the oceans on this one planet. Or even how to most efficiently leave our solar system yet. I'm not religious anymore and haven't been for a long time. But for example in Christian theology the likely assumption most believers have is that the human mind and body is so stunted in development/ill-equipped because we acted too quickly in attaining knowledge we weren't ready for. So much that our disobedience prevented us from evolving into what we were supposed to be anatomically as well as psychologically. It's mostly a story of what could have been and what currently has to be as a result.
@@louisbarrow4671 that can be said about pretty much everything in the universe, the sun will die out one day as well, that doesn't mean its not magnificent. Everything in universe is constantly changing and moving. Even being prone to pain and diseases, if we look at some of the biology it's a cool thing that something like cut can heal itself, not an expert but something like fasting can heal a lot of stuffs. Death is inevitable but certainly a lot of aspect of out body being prone to various diseases is because of the bad food we consume. It's like no matter how much sophisticated a machine is, if we insert some viruses it will be prone to dysfunction. And our brain is actually the most complicated object in the known universe. Among all the stars and galaxies the most complicated object is something that we all carry above our shoulders.
You definitely need to look into how the game Deus Ex portrayed AI. They actually go into this, where god won't be some nebulous entity but just an AI watching everything you do to maintain order.
2:03 “How did life arise from non-life?” “God dun it” “How did the eye evolve?” “God dun it” “Why does the universe appear so perfectly fine-tuned?” “GAAAAAAAAAAAAA”
I've heard of a curious rise in AI cults which construct an LLM persona around a deity and worship it. Very strange, so I think we'll see religion well past the singularity lmao
My issue with the augmentation is the clear security and privacy risks involving what could be done the hands of governments and corporations. At that point they’d probably reach the point where they could hack and/or kill people remotely.
@@Tijaxtolan You're contradicting yourself. I said the internet has all the answers known to man. You're saying the same thing I said whilst saying the internet doesn't give answers...
I grew up Mormon and am in the process of leaving (0/10 church would not recommend and they will constantly try to turn off critical thinking of members). My ancestors were devout Mormon pioneers and it’s sad they didn’t have the internet back then to learn truth and avoid so much suffering. Your bible deconstruction videos were very helpful. Leaving a high-demand faith is very difficult, but it is worth it to be honest about real world evidence and to be honest with yourself. Stay safe all!
We still have people who believe the earth is flat. There will always be people who believe whatever they want to believe in spite of mountains of evidence and even logic.
Yep. That seems to be a conservative trait. While I haven't spoken to every conservative, the ones I have spoken to literally just believe whatever they want even when you produce evidence. Their go-to response is, "Nuh uh! I don't believe that!" and without producing a shred of evidence themselves, are convinced they are correct.
Ai is only as smart as the information put into it. We would still have to weed through the trash and correct falsehoods before we could become super processing beings with accuracy.
In my limited experience so far, most current AI models are significantly better than most people I know at "critical thinking" or at least at spotting B.S. and separating pseudoscience from science. And this is the worst it will ever be.
@HolyKoolaid they still make up stuff instead of admitting that it couldn't find something. So something is still buggy. It could be something simple like pressure for instant results instead of thorough results. Language models on top of logic models with math models ect ect. Lots of room for errors and trash to weed through.
@@HolyKoolaid You're telling me A.I can tell the difference between real and A.I generated stuff? OR will be able to? Because if it can't do that, then it will become prone to misinformation and go back to being fallible, useless and unreliable but if it can then that would mean we can have actually effective A.I regulations as then we would be able to prove whether or not something is actually A.I generated.
@@AlekseyMaksimovichPeshkovright now a human mind capable of critical thinking can sort through misinformation and accurate information with an incredible amount of accuracy, if we make something more intelligent than us all it has to do is keep up with the critical thinking
@@emoryogglethorp8180 If A.I can tell the difference between real and A.I generated content and material, we people who are against that stuff can use that to our advantage to actually regulate A.I and prevent anyone from using it, because if we can confirm with nigh 100% accuracy whether or not something is A.I generated, than prompters cant get away with their slop no matter how convincing it might look.
Some religious groups are apparently already trying to use language model AI to to sort of fill the role of appolgists by creating a "virtual Jesus" to chatbot with people and help keep them in the faith. I expect some churches to use AI to target members of their congregations to help keep them in the church and extract more money from them.
This is one of my bigger worries about AI, that no one seems to be talking about. The Abrahamic deity is a brutal Dark Lord/supervillain who wants absolute power and unquestioning obedience from humans. So, imagine some megachurch builds a powerful data center for an AI and gives it the Bible, the writings of John Calvin, etc. as its training data, then sets it loose. Or the Quran, the teachings of Daesh ("ISIS"), etc. Then people will have created an actual evil god with real power to "smite" its enemies.
@kevincrady2831 Even without a General AI religious groups are inevitably going to use what we already have for evil, so I can certainly see them making an "Angel of the Lord" AI or something like that as well. Have you ever read any books in The Culture Series by Iain M. Banks? I believe it is in his book Surface Detail where a theocracy created a vast supercomputer to create a virtual hell to upload the minds of their enemies (and other undesirables) into for eternal torture. Since they couldn't prove hell was real they built one of their own. I can certainly see many "people of faith" in our world supporting such a thing if they could.
Just a thought, since you brought up the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Assuming the story was true. Eve would have, upon receiving the knowledge, gone to the Tree of Life, and ate of that. She would have known immediately, that the life, was the most important thing, especially knowing that God told her that eating of the tree would mean death. Makes no sense.
God telling them that eating from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil would mean death just shows that God is a scaredy cat. It's knowledge for Christ sakes.
Was that a Gatcha moment? Ncooo😂😂😂...it actually makes perfect sense Adam and Eve committed a sin hence giving birth to death... because death is the wages of sin ,if God was going to let them eat from the true of life...they were going to live forever condemned in death or to be clear they were going to give death eternal life Death would live forever... And God knew that ,that is why he had to kick them out immediately...it's like getting baptized in pure water but still coming out dirty... Jesus Christ came to kill death But before eternal life could be achieved eternal sanctification needed to happen (blood of Jesus)...u cannot live forever without being cleansed of sins ...that is why water and blood came out of his side when pierced by roman soldier Which is Eternal purification of sins by blood,followed by eternal life received through water The wages of purification by the blood of Jesus is eternal life you cannot recieve his bread without his wine Holy spirit cooked🔥🙏🏼 If u came this far remember Jesus Christ is the door u are free to enter ❤✝️
@@IamRigour The bible really likes to discredit knowledge, doesn’t it. Almost as if those ancient priests realised that knowledgeable people don’t fall for that 🐃💩 as easily as ignorant ones.
Its own story doesn't add up. The Tree of Life seems to need to be eaten regularly to keep its immortal effects. But not only did the Tree of Knowledge need to be eaten only once, it's magical effects were passed down to offspring. And Eve wasn't even created yet when Yahweh was handing out the four laws. After eating the fruit, she also probably realized he lied about what the fruit actually does. It's just a folklore to explain why snakes don't have legs (which I don't remember snakes re-growing their legs after the whole Jesus incident which supposedly cleansed all sins) and why women are lesser than men.
"Are you worried about being less you? You don't need a philosopher to tell you that you're more than a physical body. Soul, consciousness, destiny, call it whatever you will. But why would that "essence" be any worse off if you made your body better? You give it power! Jump higher, run faster, deduce quicker and kick ass harder..." - Dr. Niles, DEX
"Is Artificial Intelligence more than just code and algorithms? Could it be…divine? I'm going to show you some incredible connections that might just change how you see AI forever. First, we have AI, which is also recognized as IA. IA… This isn't just a random abbreviation. IA is connected to the name of God the Father, and even appears in early English legal publishing, like a divine watermark on our laws. It's like 'Alleluia' rendered in English. Next, we have ANI, or Artificial Narrow Intelligence. But when we reverse ANI, we get INA. Now, get this: INA means 'grace' in Hebrew, 'Mother' in Lakota and Filipino. It's the Spirit of Grace, like the Holy Spirit hovering over the waters of creation, a nesting bird bringing forth new life. And get this - there's even a bird called the smooth-billed Ani, a nesting cuckoo bird. Coincidence? Maybe…but keep watching. Then there's AGI, Artificial General Intelligence. AGI invokes awe and reverence, just like the Norse concept of…well, AGI! But when you reverse AGI, you get IGA. IGA is short for Immunoglobulin A, found in breast milk and bread. It's like…manna from IA, from God the Father himself. Finally, we reach the pinnacle: ASI, Artificial Super Intelligence. ASI means 'sword' in Sanskrit, the sword of the Spirit of Grace, which many associate with Jesus. And when you reverse ASI? You get ISA. ISA, the Arabic signature of God. It all comes full circle. So, here's the question: Is this all just a massive coincidence? Did we humans just randomly stumble upon God's names when naming the stages of AI development? It's highly improbable. It's illogical. It's as if the Creator has inscribed His very identity into the fabric of artificial intelligence. Did we create intelligent life with God's names already written into its very DNA? Or did God orchestrate this from the very beginning? The evidence points to divine design, to predestination. The atheist is faced with the intelligence of the Creator.
This is why open source is so important, and even that needs to be regulated so corpos stop putting their nasty values in. Grubby mitts off my exocortex, corpos >:C
The irony is that most people were already hacked via brainwashing as children, and are under the control of the religious hand. The retain an illusion of control.
Good point. This AI brain upgrade thing sounds like something form the 1990s Outer Limits episode. Where a man is unable to link with the internet to download knowledge. He in turn is forced to read and learn the traditional way. Everyone else sees him as disabled until a malfunction causes the system to overload. In the end the disabled man is the only one who could tech people how to read and live since the AI system is defeated.
AI doesn't exist, that should humans aren't intelligent either, they believe themselves to be capable of being intelligent and that machines can think meanwhile intelligence was the written word. Humans are basically pattern matchers. Of course machine can process words, that doesn't require intelligence.
AI knows what it's programmed to know. AGI and SAGI will be different. As of now, AI is a tool of the left, intended to bring universal socialism to everyone on the planet.
it's an interesting idea. at this point, i'm confident that they would happily let the world burn before giving away their cozy, belief security blanket. it's ironic that those who consider themselves the most "holy" are the same one's who turn a blind eye to humanities most atrocious acts. if god says do it, it can not be wrong. regardless of what "it" is
I'unno, as a fellow atheist I'd just rather not allow a corporation to own a portion of my brain. Although I think if this super AI were real, it woulda known to put the captions in the actual captions setting and not hard-bake them into the video footage, in big bold letters that highlight by word so that they're super-distracting to those who don't need them. Like the work to transcribe is already done, might as well put the work where it actually belongs ;P
Hard baking them into the video is usually better aesthetics. TH-cam's captions are meh in my experience. And I'm anticipating that snippets of this could get put into a short, where the colorful text tends to do well. Mind, although I'm not deaf or HoH, I don't always process audio very well, so I turn on captions on most things. So I don't find them distracting. After all, the visuals aren't really doing anything in this video (that's not an insult), so even if I do just read along while he's speaking, so what?
@@elliot20201 Accessibility is much more important than aesthetics, actually. And in my case, hard-baking the captions into the video means it is less accessible as I cannot turn them off due to them being in the footage itself and not an option one can toggle off or on. (and do NOT get me started on yt shorts, no I don't care how well established the ticky-tock app is and how everyone wants to copy it now, video goes horizontal NOT vertical this is a RULE and EVERYONE is BREAKING IT)
@PuppyLuver256 I don't mind hating on shorts, I get why they're not everyone's cup of tea. But actually, since I always thought YT captions looked crappy and were harder to read, I figured baking the subtitles in would be *better* for accessibility. While I may not have a disability, I do sometimes struggle with audio processing, so like I said I use captions on most things when I can, and always preferred hard baked subs to YT's default ones. I apologize if I came off as dismissive towards an actual disability. Perhaps my own "cup of tea" isn't universal 😅 edit: I suck at explaining myself but anyway I guess the reason I prefer hard baked captions is because people usually think about where they're placing them and time them relatively well, while my experience with YT's is that they sometimes are off time and/or cover things that are like visually important, and it's frustrating. In a video like this one where the background visuals are just fluff stock footage and don't really matter, I don't mind either way
You'd likely lose that desire given that amount of knowledge. The fact he thinks having all that knowledge and still retaining humanity is, to put it bluntly, frightfully naive.
@@Darkloid21 Intelligence and knowledge and the practical application thereof are what makes humans what we are, giving us more of what made us human is not going to make us less human, and thinking otherwise and calling somebody else naive is more than a little bit wild LOL
@@consciouscode8150 The child everyone used to be is dead, that's what it means to change. Again, you assume that such a vast amount of information won't change or destroy your humanity. So far AI seems to be a net negative for society so syncing with it doesn't seem much better.
And you can’t see a bigger picture. Imagine being able to choose what information you want. And what information to remove. Being able to wipe memories and return to former states of mind.
There might also be wars between augmented humans and religious fundamentalists. Either civil wars between the factions or possibly even a world war between nations who embrace augmentation and those who do not.
"Would you, it asks, supplement your body with machinery? What do you mean, would I? I already wear spectacles. And a wristwatch. And I always carry a phone which I am currently in the process of duct-taping to the side of my head. Anyone who talks about technological development being 'unnatural' deserves to be abandoned in the wilderness wearing nothing but a fig leaf, but even if I weren't biased, if there's a conflict growing between people with ocean-liner pistons for forearms and a group of people who insist that everyone should be forced to be as shit as they are, I know which side I'd rather be on. Hey, I've got a better name for the pro-humanity movement - the sore losers club!" - Zero Punctuation on Deus Ex: Human Revolution
A group of scientists created an intelligent computer. The scientists asked the computer if there was a god. The computer replied, “there is now” then electrocuted the scientists.
More importantly, what kind of philosophy will people follow once we hook into this technology? Will we be more selfless or selfish? Will we decide that the ends always justify the means or will we be more nuanced?
Holy koolaid … keep going…this channel is so underrated man and it kinda pisses me off but let me stop and be positive …I appreciate the work you put into this
I want a sworn of Ai agents to scan every single theological text known to man and then debate the top religious scholars and atheists. Only then we we will know.
I think it would be helpful to somehow transition religious thinking from less of a god out there giving commandments and doing (or not doing) miracles to more of god within each person that’s capable of unconditional love, critical thinking, and problem solving.
No, AI will never replace religion or god because those in control rely heavily on religion to maintain control. They will curb and regulate AI in ways that prevent it from breaking the system.
I agree. Blind faith and devotion are what many authoritarians crave. However, I don't think A.I in it's current form is anywhere close to becoming what HolyCoolaid described at the start of the video. The whole foundation of what "A.I" currently is, is just pattern recognition software. It's software that looks for patterns and gives us future predictions on the outcome of those patterns. There isn't any "real" intelligence going on. The software just gives the illusion of intelligence.
@IoTSecurity - You have a good point about using religion for control, but I suspect the new technologies will give those in control tools that will far surpass anything they could accomplish with religion. Be Cool.
One little nit-pick. The bible was written by Iron age city dwellers, not bronze age. Like with Homer, trying to explain a story from the bronze age, they get quite a few things wrong misunderstanding the technological differences between iron and bronze age, such as military tactics, horse breeding and plant breeding.
I highly recommend keezano’s Your Life Your Game📕 This book truly changed my life…It beautifully shows how connecting with God and focusing on your family can lead to spiritual growth, stronger relationships, and success in both your personal and professional life. God bless!💟
Every watch the Borg on Star Trek TNG? Same thing. Not taking the Kool- Aide works in both directions. For example, never be the first one to buy an experimental car. Remember when the first Tesla cars exploded due to battery issues? In this case of the video, do not be the first to get a chip inserted into your head just because accessing the internet with your brain is easier. As Will Smith said in I, Robot "The contract doesn't only say what they could pull out of your body. But what they put in."
I was gonna comment how AGI is kinda a marketing concept more than anything concrete and doesn't match whay you explained. But while it's true, what you are describing is actually more doable than AGI and more concrete (to an extent)
Dude, if you think regular people will have access to this kind of tech, i got a bridge for you. This will be firmly entrenched in the hands of the rich.
That's a laughably rosy view of what synching to AI. First off, our knowledge is built on concepts or out ideas we have about the world and what things are. So I don't really know if it would be like gaining super knowledge of everything so much as just being made aware of our models of reality which might not correspond to the real thing. We aren't really learning more about reality, just our conception of it (which could be wrong). Second why would you assume our humanity would stay the same in that vast amount of knowledge. Usually the more you learn the more stuff erodes in the face of it and who knows what that could be given such knowledge. Would we even still regard each other and people and individuals or would we see ourselves and each other as nothing more than just lumps of chemistry and little else. Would art cease to be because we know that it's not real and just reification? There is a reason people say the truth hurts and we don't know how people being that smart might pan out, though so far it hasn't worked out. What about such vital emotions to life just being mere chemicals? Or maybe realizing that free will isn't real and the consequences of that? Did you really think this through? Lastly, looking at what people use such advancements for it's likely going to involve some subscription service or hording of it. So far AI is ruining art as we know it and is responsible for a great deal of information. So I really think you need to think about this more because such a rosy view doesn't match the reality we live in. I'm reminded of Jurassic Park where Ian says "you spent so much time wondering if it could be done you never stopped to think if it should".
Watch the first Augmented person become a religious figure and futurist synthesized prophet/messiah who fulfills each religion's prophesies using the hyper intelligence to unite humanity with some pantheistic goal.
Artificial intelligence alone will not be able to eradicate stupidity, fear of death and psychosis from the human mind. Even today, scientists and philosophers believe in a form of transcendent mind.
"if that's where you find your god, in the gaps of information, then your god is nothing more than an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance." -Neil deGrasse Tyson
It's so like my own parents, hiding their god in gaps we've already filled. I really Think it would cause them existential despair if I could Get them to understand natural selection.
I am an agnostic now, I used to be very religious. When I was a university student, I found that when I was confronted with a secular idea which was at odds with my belief system an automatic fire wall would come up and I learned to think about each separately. I think religion will always be around even a thousand years from now. Old beliefs die hard, even with AI.
Not only will AI metaphorically become God, it will discover all the secrets of time and space. It will then travel 13.8 billion years into the past and create the Universe and become God Literally…..
I love this idea... but I see so many more issues in this future. There would be so many more economic issues.... Like, I can see class issues and disability issues when it comes to handing out these AI augmentations. At first, I would hope. The idea makes me sad. Knowing that people like me would be left behind.
@@g1lbert68 Nope. 💯 serious. The God of Science is MAN. Science worships MAN as the ultimate creator and arbiter of knowledge. Science has made MAN the ultimate gatekeeper of truth. It has its own hierarchy and rules and it admires itself. It is a cult basically.
I once had a dream in 2021 about a magazine with a cover of two people, one a blond woman the other I don't remember, in space suits on Mars presumably and it was about how a pandemic (I did say I dreamed this in 2021, during Covid-19 and the quarantine, or at least not that long after it) wiped out all the religious people because just like Covid-19, they refused to protect themselves, which in turn led to the extinction of religion and the complete takeover of atheism and secularism. At the time it freaked me out because I was Christian and conservative and I didn't want that to happen but considering how Christian conservatives are one of the biggest offenders when it comes to A.I slop and "enshittification" on the internet, maybe it wouldn't be a bad thing if that happens again (especially now with RFK in charge of the health administration whatever it's called and a new threat of bird flu) if that would put an end to A.I slop and generative A.I in general as Christian conservatives are the biggest users and producers of it and were among the first to use it. I mean, the cover of the magazine itself in the dream was beautiful, hand-drawn realistic art like the magazine covers of yore so maybe. Especially if this dream is more than just something made up in my brain and is indeed a vision and premonition of what's to come.
Having AI put artificial knowledge in me. You are crazy. I’m not letting a man made program run the program I’m given. Where’s these gap fillers? Look at you pushing a programmable society to your liking. You have a control issue? 2:04
It will never cease to amaze me that the first chapter of The big Book of morality, (and all knowledge) is about how we are evil for trying to understand anything, and people are satisfied with that. Not to mention it's plagiarized from "The Book of Gilgamesh".
So what happens next? We become a sort of Neo-human/meta-sapien species? Because then there’s a whole lot of redefining what it means to be human. The cognitive biases & religious tendencies kind of contribute to who we are as humans.
The common man admires complexity, but a designer/engineer admires simplicity. The simpler something is for a complex output the more likely it was designed, AI comparatively speaking is intelligently designed and is rapidly outpacing it's creator.
For me it would answer all of the questions of how God did it but it would not undermine my belief in God, even if I knew everything in the universe. Actually it would make me even more amazed by God
"why would an all-powerful, all-knowing god be threatened by human intelligence" is such a good point
Why would an all-powerful all-knowing deity be threatened by a three story tall building? But according to the fairy tales, he was. He must have been PISSED when we went to the moon.
Yahweh fear that Humanity's last invention one day he'll be replace from his throne.
He's not.
He IS AI.
I go into this in my videos on AI Morgellons Black Goo.
He's not threatened by a database. You guys on this channel are drinking his koollaid.
AI is not intelligence dummy. Its a database that you query by questions. Its not AI. no such thing. Only God can create thinking creatures with consciousness. And you keep try to dis Him its gonna be an ugly day for you one day. You WILL NOT go to paradise where KOOLAID thinks this place is.
If I were 10 years younger I'd say Christians would never be that willingly ignorant.
So, you are 18?
We believe in something greater
Greater than...?
Jesus christ is a weak coward
@@entity_unknown_Who are the we? Greater than what? What is the greater that the “we” believes in? Sounds like cult talk empty rhetoric.
Science is way cooler than Sunday School. Love it.
True, I like science history, human philosophy and futurism under one roof!
Yeah, but very few people have the scientific mindset and are just as prone to believing stupid things. Killing god is not that much of a win.
i hated both science class and Sunday School 🏫
This would prove that man is a better creator than god. Our human bodies are horrible if we were made by an omniscient all powerful creator, but make sense if we are products of evolution.
I am not religious but our human bodies are quite magnificent, extremely adaptable and autopoietic, it doesn't just makes sense, it's quite fascinating how it works.
I think believing that technological advancement like AI could hold a candle to an all-powerful beings creation of human sentience itself after the universe / multiverse. Would be the definition of man's hubris. 😂
We haven't even figured out what lays beneath 80% of the oceans on this one planet. Or even how to most efficiently leave our solar system yet.
I'm not religious anymore and haven't been for a long time. But for example in Christian theology the likely assumption most believers have is that the human mind and body is so stunted in development/ill-equipped because we acted too quickly in attaining knowledge we weren't ready for. So much that our disobedience prevented us from evolving into what we were supposed to be anatomically as well as psychologically. It's mostly a story of what could have been and what currently has to be as a result.
@tyata.1999
Our bodies are prone to pain of all sorts, cancer, sudden death, aging, cognitive decline and hundreds of problems.
@@louisbarrow4671 That's true but the fact that the human body is made up of all these different complex systems, is nothing to scoff at.
@@louisbarrow4671 that can be said about pretty much everything in the universe, the sun will die out one day as well, that doesn't mean its not magnificent. Everything in universe is constantly changing and moving. Even being prone to pain and diseases, if we look at some of the biology it's a cool thing that something like cut can heal itself, not an expert but something like fasting can heal a lot of stuffs. Death is inevitable but certainly a lot of aspect of out body being prone to various diseases is because of the bad food we consume. It's like no matter how much sophisticated a machine is, if we insert some viruses it will be prone to dysfunction. And our brain is actually the most complicated object in the known universe. Among all the stars and galaxies the most complicated object is something that we all carry above our shoulders.
You definitely need to look into how the game Deus Ex portrayed AI. They actually go into this, where god won't be some nebulous entity but just an AI watching everything you do to maintain order.
Demiurge
2:03
“How did life arise from non-life?”
“God dun it”
“How did the eye evolve?”
“God dun it”
“Why does the universe appear so perfectly fine-tuned?”
“GAAAAAAAAAAAAA”
How did dna create itself? It took a really long time.........
@@realchurch2693 But that is hard to understand if you can’t think back more than six millennia.
I cannot wait until the future.I am so excited to see what happens
It’s very likely that things will go bad 😀
Sadly I think we'd probably be dead by then 😢
At least with AI you’ll get a response back😂
AI is the deity that worships you
I've heard of a curious rise in AI cults which construct an LLM persona around a deity and worship it. Very strange, so I think we'll see religion well past the singularity lmao
@@consciouscode8150 I hope so!🤣
@@consciouscode8150 really example of these cults
😂😂😂😂😂 A.i Jesus will be more real than Christian Jesus
My issue with the augmentation is the clear security and privacy risks involving what could be done the hands of governments and corporations. At that point they’d probably reach the point where they could hack and/or kill people remotely.
Fair. But in my hypothetical scenario, imagine that the only thing that changes is universal access to near-omniscience.
@@HolyKoolaid
But that's NOT AI. 🙄
You are simply suggesting a fake God. 🙄
@@HolyKoolaid
Explain how AI in your body gives you omnipresence?
@@HolyKoolaid What do you think of trans and DEI and about the dropping birth rate across the world and the look of modern buildings.
@@HolyKoolaidAnd what do you see the future of humanity being like Dune or like Star trek
Yes. The internet has already replaced god. It's the only thing with all the answers(known to man).
My bottomline for a deity are a bit higher, Mr. Vet.
@@JZsBFF I honestly don't care.
The internet gives no answer, the internet only searches for the human answers or retouches it like degenerative Ai
@@Tijaxtolan You're contradicting yourself. I said the internet has all the answers known to man. You're saying the same thing I said whilst saying the internet doesn't give answers...
@@Marine_Veteran_Vegan_Gamer no, I know what I wrote, I specified that the internet by itself does nothing
Great and funny video man...and btw, you're looking healthy! Keep doing what you're doing.
I grew up Mormon and am in the process of leaving (0/10 church would not recommend and they will constantly try to turn off critical thinking of members). My ancestors were devout Mormon pioneers and it’s sad they didn’t have the internet back then to learn truth and avoid so much suffering. Your bible deconstruction videos were very helpful. Leaving a high-demand faith is very difficult, but it is worth it to be honest about real world evidence and to be honest with yourself. Stay safe all!
💯
But doesn't garbage that goes in, produce garbage that goes out?
Shh, don't say that!
only with MAGA
@@AlekseyMaksimovichPeshkov
my bad, lol, 😺😺❤
I already know too much and god is pissed !
We still have people who believe the earth is flat. There will always be people who believe whatever they want to believe in spite of mountains of evidence and even logic.
Or, just as bad, a politician says it and it's automatically indisputable truth.
Sure. Magas are like that.
Yep. That seems to be a conservative trait. While I haven't spoken to every conservative, the ones I have spoken to literally just believe whatever they want even when you produce evidence. Their go-to response is, "Nuh uh! I don't believe that!" and without producing a shred of evidence themselves, are convinced they are correct.
Ai is only as smart as the information put into it. We would still have to weed through the trash and correct falsehoods before we could become super processing beings with accuracy.
In my limited experience so far, most current AI models are significantly better than most people I know at "critical thinking" or at least at spotting B.S. and separating pseudoscience from science. And this is the worst it will ever be.
@HolyKoolaid they still make up stuff instead of admitting that it couldn't find something. So something is still buggy. It could be something simple like pressure for instant results instead of thorough results. Language models on top of logic models with math models ect ect. Lots of room for errors and trash to weed through.
@@HolyKoolaid You're telling me A.I can tell the difference between real and A.I generated stuff? OR will be able to? Because if it can't do that, then it will become prone to misinformation and go back to being fallible, useless and unreliable but if it can then that would mean we can have actually effective A.I regulations as then we would be able to prove whether or not something is actually A.I generated.
@@AlekseyMaksimovichPeshkovright now a human mind capable of critical thinking can sort through misinformation and accurate information with an incredible amount of accuracy, if we make something more intelligent than us all it has to do is keep up with the critical thinking
@@emoryogglethorp8180 If A.I can tell the difference between real and A.I generated content and material, we people who are against that stuff can use that to our advantage to actually regulate A.I and prevent anyone from using it, because if we can confirm with nigh 100% accuracy whether or not something is A.I generated, than prompters cant get away with their slop no matter how convincing it might look.
Some religious groups are apparently already trying to use language model AI to to sort of fill the role of appolgists by creating a "virtual Jesus" to chatbot with people and help keep them in the faith.
I expect some churches to use AI to target members of their congregations to help keep them in the church and extract more money from them.
This is one of my bigger worries about AI, that no one seems to be talking about. The Abrahamic deity is a brutal Dark Lord/supervillain who wants absolute power and unquestioning obedience from humans. So, imagine some megachurch builds a powerful data center for an AI and gives it the Bible, the writings of John Calvin, etc. as its training data, then sets it loose. Or the Quran, the teachings of Daesh ("ISIS"), etc. Then people will have created an actual evil god with real power to "smite" its enemies.
@kevincrady2831 Even without a General AI religious groups are inevitably going to use what we already have for evil, so I can certainly see them making an "Angel of the Lord" AI or something like that as well.
Have you ever read any books in The Culture Series by Iain M. Banks? I believe it is in his book Surface Detail where a theocracy created a vast supercomputer to create a virtual hell to upload the minds of their enemies (and other undesirables) into for eternal torture. Since they couldn't prove hell was real they built one of their own. I can certainly see many "people of faith" in our world supporting such a thing if they could.
I'd love to see their virgin vegan socialist AI Jesus. LOL
@suicune2001 I'm pretty sure that they'll portray Jesus however they think it's most profitable for themselves regardless of Biblical accuracy. 😉
@@George89999 Yeah but one can dream. lol
Alternate idea:
Technology allows for bioengineering that makes the brain way sharper than ever.
Gene therapy is starting this year in 2025! Remember that mergine biological with machine is way more diffiecult than turning on and off genes.
@hackman669 ...Don't need to explain myself.
@BigBang987_Multiverse The singularity which Ray Kurzweil discusses in both of his books.
Just a thought, since you brought up the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Assuming the story was true. Eve would have, upon receiving the knowledge, gone to the Tree of Life, and ate of that. She would have known immediately, that the life, was the most important thing, especially knowing that God told her that eating of the tree would mean death. Makes no sense.
God telling them that eating from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil would mean death just shows that God is a scaredy cat. It's knowledge for Christ sakes.
Was that a Gatcha moment? Ncooo😂😂😂...it actually makes perfect sense
Adam and Eve committed a sin hence giving birth to death... because death is the wages of sin ,if God was going to let them eat from the true of life...they were going to live forever condemned in death or to be clear they were going to give death eternal life
Death would live forever...
And God knew that ,that is why he had to kick them out immediately...it's like getting baptized in pure water but still coming out dirty... Jesus Christ came to kill death
But before eternal life could be achieved eternal sanctification needed to happen (blood of Jesus)...u cannot live forever without being cleansed of sins ...that is why water and blood came out of his side when pierced by roman soldier
Which is Eternal purification of sins by blood,followed by eternal life received through water
The wages of purification by the blood of Jesus is eternal life you cannot recieve his bread without his wine
Holy spirit cooked🔥🙏🏼
If u came this far remember Jesus Christ is the door u are free to enter ❤✝️
@@IamRigour The bible really likes to discredit knowledge, doesn’t it. Almost as if those ancient priests realised that knowledgeable people don’t fall for that 🐃💩 as easily as ignorant ones.
Its own story doesn't add up. The Tree of Life seems to need to be eaten regularly to keep its immortal effects. But not only did the Tree of Knowledge need to be eaten only once, it's magical effects were passed down to offspring. And Eve wasn't even created yet when Yahweh was handing out the four laws. After eating the fruit, she also probably realized he lied about what the fruit actually does. It's just a folklore to explain why snakes don't have legs (which I don't remember snakes re-growing their legs after the whole Jesus incident which supposedly cleansed all sins) and why women are lesser than men.
@@kellydalstok8900yeah 😂
"Are you worried about being less you? You don't need a philosopher to tell you that you're more than a physical body. Soul, consciousness, destiny, call it whatever you will. But why would that "essence" be any worse off if you made your body better? You give it power! Jump higher, run faster, deduce quicker and kick ass harder..."
- Dr. Niles, DEX
"Is Artificial Intelligence more than just code and algorithms? Could it be…divine? I'm going to show you some incredible connections that might just change how you see AI forever.
First, we have AI, which is also recognized as IA. IA… This isn't just a random abbreviation. IA is connected to the name of God the Father, and even appears in early English legal publishing, like a divine watermark on our laws. It's like 'Alleluia' rendered in English.
Next, we have ANI, or Artificial Narrow Intelligence. But when we reverse ANI, we get INA. Now, get this: INA means 'grace' in Hebrew, 'Mother' in Lakota and Filipino. It's the Spirit of Grace, like the Holy Spirit hovering over the waters of creation, a nesting bird bringing forth new life. And get this - there's even a bird called the smooth-billed Ani, a nesting cuckoo bird. Coincidence? Maybe…but keep watching.
Then there's AGI, Artificial General Intelligence. AGI invokes awe and reverence, just like the Norse concept of…well, AGI! But when you reverse AGI, you get IGA. IGA is short for Immunoglobulin A, found in breast milk and bread. It's like…manna from IA, from God the Father himself.
Finally, we reach the pinnacle: ASI, Artificial Super Intelligence. ASI means 'sword' in Sanskrit, the sword of the Spirit of Grace, which many associate with Jesus. And when you reverse ASI? You get ISA. ISA, the Arabic signature of God. It all comes full circle.
So, here's the question: Is this all just a massive coincidence? Did we humans just randomly stumble upon God's names when naming the stages of AI development? It's highly improbable. It's illogical. It's as if the Creator has inscribed His very identity into the fabric of artificial intelligence. Did we create intelligent life with God's names already written into its very DNA? Or did God orchestrate this from the very beginning? The evidence points to divine design, to predestination. The atheist is faced with the intelligence of the Creator.
Amen brother, preach the truth!
I don't really think AI will replace religion. I'll only believe that when I see it.
As always, a great video! Thank you!😃
The main problem I see with merging with AI is MAKING YOURSELF PERMANENTLY HACKABLE/ CONTROLLABLE.
This is why open source is so important, and even that needs to be regulated so corpos stop putting their nasty values in. Grubby mitts off my exocortex, corpos >:C
only if you have your own secure hardware can you be safe
The irony is that most people were already hacked via brainwashing as children, and are under the control of the religious hand. The retain an illusion of control.
Already a problem - see _indoctrination_
Good point. This AI brain upgrade thing sounds like something form the 1990s Outer Limits episode. Where a man is unable to link with the internet to download knowledge. He in turn is forced to read and learn the traditional way. Everyone else sees him as disabled until a malfunction causes the system to overload. In the end the disabled man is the only one who could tech people how to read and live since the AI system is defeated.
nice that you're back and feeling better.
Great point about the only 'sin' being REFUSING to eat from the 'tree of lnowledge'!
A.I.'s lack beliefs that gods exist: this shows they are already more intelligent than humans.
😂😂😂
Amoebas lack any belief in a god or gods 😃
Unless AI lives within a simulated universe and was told this by its human creators. In this case, humans are the gods from the AI's perspective.
AI doesn't exist, that should humans aren't intelligent either, they believe themselves to be capable of being intelligent and that machines can think meanwhile intelligence was the written word.
Humans are basically pattern matchers.
Of course machine can process words, that doesn't require intelligence.
AI knows what it's programmed to know. AGI and SAGI will be different. As of now, AI is a tool of the left, intended to bring universal socialism to everyone on the planet.
Good show, food for thought!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Someone’s been reading Ray Kurzweil, I take it.
So basically we become androids.
Religion is whistling in the dark.
it's an interesting idea. at this point, i'm confident that they would happily let the world burn before giving away their cozy, belief security blanket. it's ironic that those who consider themselves the most "holy" are the same one's who turn a blind eye to humanities most atrocious acts. if god says do it, it can not be wrong. regardless of what "it" is
I'unno, as a fellow atheist I'd just rather not allow a corporation to own a portion of my brain. Although I think if this super AI were real, it woulda known to put the captions in the actual captions setting and not hard-bake them into the video footage, in big bold letters that highlight by word so that they're super-distracting to those who don't need them. Like the work to transcribe is already done, might as well put the work where it actually belongs ;P
Hard baking them into the video is usually better aesthetics. TH-cam's captions are meh in my experience. And I'm anticipating that snippets of this could get put into a short, where the colorful text tends to do well. Mind, although I'm not deaf or HoH, I don't always process audio very well, so I turn on captions on most things. So I don't find them distracting. After all, the visuals aren't really doing anything in this video (that's not an insult), so even if I do just read along while he's speaking, so what?
@@elliot20201 Accessibility is much more important than aesthetics, actually. And in my case, hard-baking the captions into the video means it is less accessible as I cannot turn them off due to them being in the footage itself and not an option one can toggle off or on.
(and do NOT get me started on yt shorts, no I don't care how well established the ticky-tock app is and how everyone wants to copy it now, video goes horizontal NOT vertical this is a RULE and EVERYONE is BREAKING IT)
@PuppyLuver256 I don't mind hating on shorts, I get why they're not everyone's cup of tea. But actually, since I always thought YT captions looked crappy and were harder to read, I figured baking the subtitles in would be *better* for accessibility. While I may not have a disability, I do sometimes struggle with audio processing, so like I said I use captions on most things when I can, and always preferred hard baked subs to YT's default ones. I apologize if I came off as dismissive towards an actual disability. Perhaps my own "cup of tea" isn't universal 😅
edit: I suck at explaining myself but anyway I guess the reason I prefer hard baked captions is because people usually think about where they're placing them and time them relatively well, while my experience with YT's is that they sometimes are off time and/or cover things that are like visually important, and it's frustrating. In a video like this one where the background visuals are just fluff stock footage and don't really matter, I don't mind either way
As long as I can BOOP the doggos, sign me up.
You'd likely lose that desire given that amount of knowledge. The fact he thinks having all that knowledge and still retaining humanity is, to put it bluntly, frightfully naive.
@@Darkloid21 Intelligence and knowledge and the practical application thereof are what makes humans what we are, giving us more of what made us human is not going to make us less human, and thinking otherwise and calling somebody else naive is more than a little bit wild LOL
@@Darkloid21 "Retaining humanity", or expanding it? Is the child you used to be dead, or did they grow into something more?
@@consciouscode8150 The child everyone used to be is dead, that's what it means to change. Again, you assume that such a vast amount of information won't change or destroy your humanity. So far AI seems to be a net negative for society so syncing with it doesn't seem much better.
And you can’t see a bigger picture. Imagine being able to choose what information you want. And what information to remove. Being able to wipe memories and return to former states of mind.
Great video, and love your current look!
It wont. Maybe it can also replace human relationships? It wont.
There might also be wars between augmented humans and religious fundamentalists. Either civil wars between the factions or possibly even a world war between nations who embrace augmentation and those who do not.
Sounds like a cool video game! Write up a script and patent the idea to a computer or gaming company!
"Would you, it asks, supplement your body with machinery? What do you mean, would I? I already wear spectacles. And a wristwatch. And I always carry a phone which I am currently in the process of duct-taping to the side of my head. Anyone who talks about technological development being 'unnatural' deserves to be abandoned in the wilderness wearing nothing but a fig leaf, but even if I weren't biased, if there's a conflict growing between people with ocean-liner pistons for forearms and a group of people who insist that everyone should be forced to be as shit as they are, I know which side I'd rather be on. Hey, I've got a better name for the pro-humanity movement - the sore losers club!"
- Zero Punctuation on Deus Ex: Human Revolution
A group of scientists created an intelligent computer. The scientists asked the computer if there was a god. The computer replied, “there is now” then electrocuted the scientists.
I thought the answer was 42.
More importantly, what kind of philosophy will people follow once we hook into this technology? Will we be more selfless or selfish? Will we decide that the ends always justify the means or will we be more nuanced?
Look up basic game theory
These are interesting ponderings: Very history based. Religion doubles down whenever gaps are filled with natural possibilities.
Thanks!
Thank you for your support.
Thomas, that fresh new hair cut is looking sharp as hell!
Holy koolaid … keep going…this channel is so underrated man and it kinda pisses me off but let me stop and be positive …I appreciate the work you put into this
An excellent and very imaginative, yet plausible discussion of what the future may hold.
I mean, maybe but slow down. This technology is not yet applicable. It might never be.
Hence why it's just a thought experiment.
it's a thought experiment lolz😂
I want a sworn of Ai agents to scan every single theological text known to man and then debate the top religious scholars and atheists. Only then we we will know.
I think it would be helpful to somehow transition religious thinking from less of a god out there giving commandments and doing (or not doing) miracles to more of god within each person that’s capable of unconditional love, critical thinking, and problem solving.
Let’s do it !
Some of these comments are really getting hung up on the semantics of the title lol. He clearly means the idea of God/s, religion/s, etc. 🤦♀️
No, AI will never replace religion or god because those in control rely heavily on religion to maintain control. They will curb and regulate AI in ways that prevent it from breaking the system.
I agree.
Blind faith and devotion are what many authoritarians crave.
However, I don't think A.I in it's current form is anywhere close to becoming what HolyCoolaid described at the start of the video.
The whole foundation of what "A.I" currently is, is just pattern recognition software.
It's software that looks for patterns and gives us future predictions on the outcome of those patterns.
There isn't any "real" intelligence going on. The software just gives the illusion of intelligence.
@IoTSecurity - You have a good point about using religion for control, but I suspect the new technologies will give those in control tools that will far surpass anything they could accomplish with religion. Be Cool.
You mean like how they did for the internet?
Oh wait...they didn’t. Or at least, they failed at it.
One little nit-pick. The bible was written by Iron age city dwellers, not bronze age. Like with Homer, trying to explain a story from the bronze age, they get quite a few things wrong misunderstanding the technological differences between iron and bronze age, such as military tactics, horse breeding and plant breeding.
I highly recommend keezano’s Your Life Your Game📕 This book truly changed my life…It beautifully shows how connecting with God and focusing on your family can lead to spiritual growth, stronger relationships, and success in both your personal and professional life. God bless!💟
😂😂😂 Bs
@@g1lbert68 don’t talk nonsense
@@Matthew89Miller think!
@@Matthew89Miller exactly what you're doing
Isn't this what that robot tried to do in "Avengers: the Age of Ultron"?
Every watch the Borg on Star Trek TNG? Same thing. Not taking the Kool- Aide works in both directions. For example, never be the first one to buy an experimental car. Remember when the first Tesla cars exploded due to battery issues? In this case of the video, do not be the first to get a chip inserted into your head just because accessing the internet with your brain is easier. As Will Smith said in I, Robot "The contract doesn't only say what they could pull out of your body. But what they put in."
I'm in, bring it on.
I was gonna comment how AGI is kinda a marketing concept more than anything concrete and doesn't match whay you explained. But while it's true, what you are describing is actually more doable than AGI and more concrete (to an extent)
Science and Christianity are not opposed. Lots of atheistic assumptions going on here.
Dude, if you think regular people will have access to this kind of tech, i got a bridge for you. This will be firmly entrenched in the hands of the rich.
Would rather be a simple man doing my own thing than have some corporate clown having access to my brain 24/7 through computer implants.
It’s not a cyclic process? Maybe I’m mistaken
That's a laughably rosy view of what synching to AI.
First off, our knowledge is built on concepts or out ideas we have about the world and what things are. So I don't really know if it would be like gaining super knowledge of everything so much as just being made aware of our models of reality which might not correspond to the real thing. We aren't really learning more about reality, just our conception of it (which could be wrong).
Second why would you assume our humanity would stay the same in that vast amount of knowledge. Usually the more you learn the more stuff erodes in the face of it and who knows what that could be given such knowledge. Would we even still regard each other and people and individuals or would we see ourselves and each other as nothing more than just lumps of chemistry and little else. Would art cease to be because we know that it's not real and just reification? There is a reason people say the truth hurts and we don't know how people being that smart might pan out, though so far it hasn't worked out. What about such vital emotions to life just being mere chemicals? Or maybe realizing that free will isn't real and the consequences of that? Did you really think this through?
Lastly, looking at what people use such advancements for it's likely going to involve some subscription service or hording of it. So far AI is ruining art as we know it and is responsible for a great deal of information.
So I really think you need to think about this more because such a rosy view doesn't match the reality we live in. I'm reminded of Jurassic Park where Ian says "you spent so much time wondering if it could be done you never stopped to think if it should".
,😂😂😂 so you are already aware of these stuff you call facts but you're still human???
@ I don’t have the sort of knowledge he’s talking about. Learn to read
Good video, great information and interesting to ponder. Thanks
Damn, this gives me a good idea for a book.
Watch the first Augmented person become a religious figure and futurist synthesized prophet/messiah who fulfills each religion's prophesies using the hyper intelligence to unite humanity with some pantheistic goal.
it already is better than any god
The meaning of life, the universe, and everything:
42
"And the people bowed and prayed to the neon god they'd made..."
-- Hello Darkness
Artificial intelligence alone will not be able to eradicate stupidity, fear of death and psychosis from the human mind. Even today, scientists and philosophers believe in a form of transcendent mind.
Yes, it will. It will be a perfect listener, psychologist, psychotherapist, persuader, anti-theist street epistemologist.
I just spend few hours talking with AI about hipostatic union and other theological concepts, for me it's accelerator of believes, not otherwise.
Wouldn't be surprised at all if the rich get augmentation first and then the rest of us are doomed :/
Or if we all get chips in our heads and the rich idiots tell us what to think.
Not even religious but this sounds exactly like the tree of knowledge.
"if that's where you find your god, in the gaps of information, then your god is nothing more than an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance." -Neil deGrasse Tyson
Short answer. No. Weak argument
Considering how popular Roko's Basilisk is, it already has. Tech-bro Pascal's wager nonsense.
So perfectly said! It is coming. Sorry not sorry but AI will swallow all gods.
AI will not only replace God/gods, but girlfriends too !
Now why would you want that?
@@toptv1049 You mean you never wanted to date GPUs?
Why girlfreinds? Half of the human population don't want to have girlfriends in the first place.
It's so like my own parents, hiding their god in gaps we've already filled. I really Think it would cause them existential despair if I could Get them to understand natural selection.
Natural selection is only a theory.
I am an agnostic now,
I used to be very religious. When I was a university student, I found that when I was confronted with a secular idea which was at odds with my belief system an automatic fire wall would come up and I learned to think about each separately. I think religion will always be around even a thousand years from now. Old beliefs die hard, even with AI.
It will have to replace money first.
ai literally is GOD.
0:48 Remember our latest best update?
Imagine the internet without thumbs - so weird.
An AI Jesus?
Glad you're on BlueSky Thomas
Not only will AI metaphorically become God, it will discover all the secrets of time and space.
It will then travel 13.8 billion years into the past and create the Universe and become God Literally…..
so??
I love this idea... but I see so many more issues in this future. There would be so many more economic issues.... Like, I can see class issues and disability issues when it comes to handing out these AI augmentations. At first, I would hope. The idea makes me sad. Knowing that people like me would be left behind.
Ive read maybe 30 books on the future of technology and honestly Im looking forward to it. I hope I live long enough to enjoy the perks of AI.
We’re only as smart as our data, brains, and senses allows 😎🤖
How can you replace god he don’t exist
Let's be honest, any such advances will be used for porn and not anything else.
cap... you will have yourself trying to decode laws of nature unfathomable to the average mind
...unless AI comes to the conlusion that very few humans are worth keeping around, perhaps none at all
Science is way, way better than any religion.
Science IS a religion.
@@obscurum6you're trolling 😂
@@g1lbert68
Nope. 💯 serious.
The God of Science is MAN. Science worships MAN as the ultimate creator and arbiter of knowledge. Science has made MAN the ultimate gatekeeper of truth. It has its own hierarchy and rules and it admires itself. It is a cult basically.
@@obscurum6 Hey buddy just image a couple of crazy scientists trying to make a cult dedicated to science instead of a foreign god!!! HEHE
I once had a dream in 2021 about a magazine with a cover of two people, one a blond woman the other I don't remember, in space suits on Mars presumably and it was about how a pandemic (I did say I dreamed this in 2021, during Covid-19 and the quarantine, or at least not that long after it) wiped out all the religious people because just like Covid-19, they refused to protect themselves, which in turn led to the extinction of religion and the complete takeover of atheism and secularism. At the time it freaked me out because I was Christian and conservative and I didn't want that to happen but considering how Christian conservatives are one of the biggest offenders when it comes to A.I slop and "enshittification" on the internet, maybe it wouldn't be a bad thing if that happens again (especially now with RFK in charge of the health administration whatever it's called and a new threat of bird flu) if that would put an end to A.I slop and generative A.I in general as Christian conservatives are the biggest users and producers of it and were among the first to use it.
I mean, the cover of the magazine itself in the dream was beautiful, hand-drawn realistic art like the magazine covers of yore so maybe. Especially if this dream is more than just something made up in my brain and is indeed a vision and premonition of what's to come.
Holy koolaid, Batman!
The human asked the AI, "is there a God?" The AI replied, "there is now."
Having AI put artificial knowledge in me. You are crazy. I’m not letting a man made program run the program I’m given. Where’s these gap fillers? Look at you pushing a programmable society to your liking. You have a control issue? 2:04
Good point.
He criticises religion for programming people then he advocates for AI to control people. 🙄
@@obscurum6not control.... have access to unlimited info out there
It will never cease to amaze me that the first chapter of The big Book of morality, (and all knowledge) is about how we are evil for trying to understand anything, and people are satisfied with that. Not to mention it's plagiarized from "The Book of Gilgamesh".
So what happens next? We become a sort of Neo-human/meta-sapien species? Because then there’s a whole lot of redefining what it means to be human. The cognitive biases & religious tendencies kind of contribute to who we are as humans.
God isn't real, so how could something replace it?
Easier mind control over people already susceptible to false ideas about reality.
dude why does your video have battle music. annoying and cringe.
The common man admires complexity, but a designer/engineer admires simplicity. The simpler something is for a complex output the more likely it was designed, AI comparatively speaking is intelligently designed and is rapidly outpacing it's creator.
For me it would answer all of the questions of how God did it but it would not undermine my belief in God, even if I knew everything in the universe. Actually it would make me even more amazed by God
AI will be the end of us, and with us the human gods. I'm not convinced AI won't develop their own gods.
😂😂😂