Yamato Battleship Vs Modern Destroyer.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ก.ค. 2022
  • The Yamato is the biggest warship ever constructed, How would this mighty battleship, the Yamato from the 1940s compete against a modern day destroyer? Would it stand a chance?
    Voiceover by @krakenmediapro. check them out here: kraken.media/
    Life and death if the largest warship ever built, The Yamato: • ⚓ Naval Legends Marath...
    Licensed by: creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    #whatif #grnavalbattle #navellegends
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 69

  • @KrakenMediaPro
    @KrakenMediaPro ปีที่แล้ว +33

    What if the Yamato was upgraded with modern Radar etc though?

    • @user-cq5fe9od1b
      @user-cq5fe9od1b ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The resource that kind of modification requires will be enough to produce more modern destroyers. Therefore, it would probably be 1 upgraded Yamato vs 10 modern destroyers, which means that there would be hundreds of anti-ship missiles flying toward Yamato in the first few minutes of the battle. That would be enough to destroy its radar and guns and kill a huge number of sailors who are supposed to operate the ship.

    • @opesam
      @opesam ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So...not a Yamato then? 🤔

    • @CubeThing
      @CubeThing 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Missiles still outrange guns, even if radar was better the guns wouldnt reach

  • @B1ack_Manta
    @B1ack_Manta ปีที่แล้ว +15

    No disrespect to Japan, but Yamato would have no answer for a destroyer and would be at it's mercy.

  • @olengagallardo8551
    @olengagallardo8551 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Unless the destroyer had tactical nukes the yamato would open it up like a giant can opener

  • @rickfox4068
    @rickfox4068 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Yamato is going to the bottom. Fill the VLS with tomahawk cruise missiles, stand off 500 miles and obliterate the battleship!

  • @aleksnight5406
    @aleksnight5406 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The author forgot one important detail. The armor penetration of Harpoon missiles is approximately 6 inches. Their warhead is identical to the 8-inch semi-armor-piercing projectile in weight and other characteristics. The rocket's speed is only 0.8M, while the projectile's is 2M at the moment of impact.
    The battleship's armor is designed to withstand hits from projectiles with 20-50 times the energy and is 14-18 inches thick. Yes, missiles will cause heavy damage to auxiliary caliber guns and upper unarmored superstructures. But the conning tower, main caliber towers, citadel, ship control and gun guidance systems will be intact. The firing range for main caliber guns is approximately 22 nautical miles. At a distance of 14 miles, the ship can fire based on data from optical rangefinders. Modern cruisers and destroyers are tin boxes filled with explosives and fragile mechanisms. One high-explosive shell is enough to cause catastrophic damage. The battleship fires 9 shells in one salvo. 18 rounds per minute at the highest rate of fire.

  • @f50koenigg
    @f50koenigg 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You forgot that arleigh burk class also carries tomahawk cruise missiles can be turn into anti ship missiles if situation calls for it

  • @chiasphere2549
    @chiasphere2549 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Never though the Yamato was nearly this advance. Epic 🤩

    • @iwueseiorwuese3442
      @iwueseiorwuese3442 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, I didn't expect it. This is epic, please make more.

  • @-Griffin-
    @-Griffin- ปีที่แล้ว +9

    A battleship is made to fight another battleship
    18 in gun is not a good weapon vs a destroyer. Yamato tried in 44 and the shell passed through the destroyer without exploding

    • @rickfox4068
      @rickfox4068 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That was because they were using armor piercing shells and thought the destroyer was actually a cruiser.

    • @manilajohn0182
      @manilajohn0182 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The destroyer (USS Johnston) was fatally damaged by three first- salvo hits.

    • @davidskr4924
      @davidskr4924 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@manilajohn0182 Not fatally but heavily. But was still capable of fighting other ship despite heavy damage

    • @manilajohn0182
      @manilajohn0182 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidskr4924 The hits reduced Johnston's speed enough to ensure that in that situation (surrounded by enemy warships), she was not going to escape. I referred to it as fatal damage on that basis. Whether or not the three hits alone would have eventually resulted in Johnston's sinking is something which has never been resolved. To be clear- I'm not saying that Yamato alone sunk Johnston, as other vessels participated in her sinking.

  • @maximilliancunningham6091
    @maximilliancunningham6091 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The 40mm would simply bounce off the side of Yamato.

    • @BobThomas123
      @BobThomas123 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The top will be destroyed

  • @xavier4260
    @xavier4260 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If older battleships are fitted with new anti-missile systems, then they can be stopped lol. They would shoot those down get close enough and bang. They cannot shoot down shells. Morden ship will simply run out of missiles to fire, and would be running away 😅

    • @BobThomas123
      @BobThomas123 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are more tomahawk cruise missiles on the Modernized USS Iowa class

  • @BlackSkull1984
    @BlackSkull1984 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Basically High School Fleet reference

  • @HenriHattar
    @HenriHattar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The British actually had 18 inch guns on a ship in WW1.

  • @sci-fipedia4586
    @sci-fipedia4586 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @DonaldWheelis-xb1lu
    @DonaldWheelis-xb1lu 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    In this case the DDG would fire fires lol

  • @saco7281
    @saco7281 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yamato had 4 turrets ??? Are you kidding me?

  • @richy69ify
    @richy69ify ปีที่แล้ว

    Holy volume level

  • @iwueseiorwuese3442
    @iwueseiorwuese3442 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Can a destroyer intercept shells fired at it by a battleship?

    • @legendaryussiowaclass9635
      @legendaryussiowaclass9635 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not possible

    • @Zach1221
      @Zach1221 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      CIWS: I beg to differ

    • @hiltonryllecabeguin9192
      @hiltonryllecabeguin9192 ปีที่แล้ว

      no..

    • @mj7188
      @mj7188 ปีที่แล้ว

      With missile maybe it can

    • @team3am149
      @team3am149 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If the destroyer was aware of the incoming shells and had its targeting radar facing towards the projectiles, yes.

  • @Vanillasky2006
    @Vanillasky2006 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If Yamato can just move in for the kill

  • @hypotheticalexperiments4336
    @hypotheticalexperiments4336  ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What are your thoughts?

  • @xavier4260
    @xavier4260 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just need new radar, and automatic air defence, that can shoot down the missiles. While the morden ship cant shoot down the shells

  • @mackyaguado2803
    @mackyaguado2803 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Single modern destroyer missile can easily sink yamato without a knowing who and what have hit them

    • @gamersparadise7014
      @gamersparadise7014 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bruh what if a modern destroyer is very close to yamato

    • @piyushnegi8121
      @piyushnegi8121 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gamersparadise7014 which would rarely happen in this day and age. We have advanced quite a lot in terms of radar and thus a destroyer would always know yamato's location and would purposefully avoid it's range. But yeah in close range, Yamato could very well clap any destroyer.

    • @fedelidadteruel4364
      @fedelidadteruel4364 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did you know that ww2 battleship are better than this pathetic destroyers

    • @fedelidadteruel4364
      @fedelidadteruel4364 ปีที่แล้ว

      Battleship have armor that can ricochet rockets and missiles

    • @edtoomuchfun957
      @edtoomuchfun957 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@fedelidadteruel4364 Ricochet... no - remember missiles explode. But the armor of the Yamato at the belt line definitely would absorb the impact. Now if they were able to target below the belt line or come in through the top decking then it potentially would start taking serious damage.

  • @anvarri9196
    @anvarri9196 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dumb question here: were Yama's AA batteries and systems taken in account?
    Just asking

    • @JustADiamondBlock
      @JustADiamondBlock 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wouldn’t even matter. missiles would be too fast and DD is too far away.

    • @dg20120
      @dg20120 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The anti aircraft systems had a lot of difficulty with anything coming in at a steep angle. Tomahawk missiles coming in at near vertical and 500+ mph would be much tougher to stop than a dive bomber.

  • @usangeaguji2555
    @usangeaguji2555 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Destroyer always wins

  • @johnstrac
    @johnstrac 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm a minute in and I know that Yamato was "the" biggest not "one of" the biggest shios built by Japan and that it had 9 not 12 main guns.

  • @finkenf10
    @finkenf10 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You called the Yamato the Bismarck at 2:35ish, just an fyi lol

    • @Kakarot64.
      @Kakarot64. 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Meh same thing one torpedo exploding near the propellors would have both helplessly sailing in circles while the Destroyer dances around them outside of the battleships weapon range both battleships might as well be the same thing.... target practice.

  • @YTT718
    @YTT718 ปีที่แล้ว

    Without GPS how effective will a Destroyers missles be

    • @fguocokgyloeu4817
      @fguocokgyloeu4817 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Harpoon missile is guided by an on-board RADAR. I don't know enough about the interaction of the Tomahawk missile's system, but it has RADAR and terrain contour mapping on top of inertial guidance. As far as I know, it, like most GPS guided systems that have alternatives, can disengage the GPS component if the GPS uplink is jammed.

  • @iam-wing12
    @iam-wing12 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rip destroyer

  • @cjbongalon2064
    @cjbongalon2064 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    guys try to watch the last ship s5: e:10

  • @Wongwanchungwongjumbo
    @Wongwanchungwongjumbo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If American destroy are fitted woth Tomahawk Cruise Missile, that will destroy the,Yanato nail Engine and 3rd Rear turrent above the Armour belt penetrat.

  • @ulyssesbinoya1134
    @ulyssesbinoya1134 ปีที่แล้ว

    If modern day destroyer make a duel to yamato at 500 meters distànce destroyer cant win without gps and sattelite feed location data.

    • @fguocokgyloeu4817
      @fguocokgyloeu4817 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Not true, a modern day destroyer has far longer range and high-fidelity RADAR and two helicopters to help locate if absolutely necessary.

  • @christhong7421
    @christhong7421 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bismark?! Whut?

  • @manilajohn0182
    @manilajohn0182 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    358 Aircraft. Just sayin...

  • @Wongwanchungwongjumbo
    @Wongwanchungwongjumbo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The American Battleship Iowa Class will sink like Yamato if faced off by Russian Battle Cruiser Kirov class.

    • @silentwulffff
      @silentwulffff 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia is losing the naval war to a country that doesn’t have a navy

  • @braydenshafford342
    @braydenshafford342 ปีที่แล้ว

    If a Yamato class battleship was built with all the technology the US has to offer how could a destroyer stand a chance.

    • @edtoomuchfun957
      @edtoomuchfun957 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thats not really the point of this thought exercise though.