Softears Studio 4: The Ultimate Neutral IEM? | vs Pilgrim, SA6 MK II, & Kiwi Ears Orchestra Lite
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 มิ.ย. 2024
- This is a video review and comparison of the Softears Studio 4.
Check out my frequency response graphs here: atechreviews.squig.link/
For those interested in sending review samples, please contact me at atechreviewsmedia@gmail.com - เพลง
I bought the Studio 4 and i was worried because alot of people said its very neutral and some even said boring.. Long story short its the best 4 BA ive ever listened to.. the Bass is perfect vocals sound beautyful.. not going to buy another IEM soon 👍👍👍
I think people say it’s boring just because they may be used to or like V-Shaped stuff more. After all, this hobby is subjective for a good amount of it and something may sound amazing to someone while it may sound too boomy or too bright or not etc for another
Totally agree! For me, neutral never means boring, especially if the IEM has an accurate, highly detailed sound. It means it faithfully reproduces what I'm listening to. If I listen to something fun, it will sound fun.
@@AtechreviewsPlus with a neutral setting you can always EQ the hell out of it
@@shamelessplace11 That's right and the stock tuning will be the reference allowing you to accurately judge the change in sound.
Nice review!
Thanks!
Studio 4 vs Blessing 3 vs Dusk vs Hype 4?
My favorite iems are hexa and performer 5. I love vocals, clarity, detail, and technicality. Bass warmth is a nice bonus but not a must.
I think we should also consider including the Pilgrim in the mix, just for the sake of it LOL. I also have a great appreciation for the Performer 5.
Watch this review while using Studio4. Oh my god, I love this iem even more than Monarch MK2, SA6 MK2 and U4S. I'm not saying this iem is better (obviously not), but it's as if there's magic that always makes me come back to listen to it. I use the included eartips and if they fit properly into my ears properly I won't feel any pressure build up. Great review. Love it ❤️
There's something about the Studio 4 that sounds just right. It's so natural and realistic-easily one of the best IEMs I've ever heard.
If there's magic for you then for you it's better. Nothing wrong with that
Halo om. Dari 4 itu yang cocok vokal atau timbre bagus apa om? Genre atau artis favorit nya apa om?
@@yongkykurniawan1089 yang paling bagus vokalnya Studio4 > Monarch MK2 > U4S > SA6 MK2. Yang paling natural timbrenya U4S > Studio4 > Monarch MK2 > SA6 MK2. Playlist gw kebanyakan JPop, terutama vokalis perempuan seperti Aimer, Ado, Yorushika, Yoasobi, Kessoku Band dan Uru. Lalu juga ada beberapa soundtrack musik dari Frieren dan Orchestra.
Finally! Studio 4 🎉🎉🎉
Finally! 😊
@@Atechreviews I thought you would compare it to the DaVinci as well
@@Zen.bassoon I did compare them, but not in the video because their sound signatures and driver configurations are totally different. The Studio 4 has a neutral sound with neutral bass, while the DaVinci has strong bass that makes the lower mid-range sound warmer and fuller. The Studio 4 excels in mid-range, treble, soundstage, detail retrieval, instrument separation, sound isolation, and comfort. The Studio 4 sounds more neutral, accurate, and realistic to me while the DaVinci sounds much more fun. I will keep both because they serve different purposes.
@@Atechreviews Sure. Thank you!
@@Zen.bassoon You're welcome! 🙂
May you please do an iem ranking list (excel or google docs) based strictly on sound quality with scoring on technicalities (for example, imaging, detail, and or resolution) and tone (example bass, midrange, treble or just plain tonality score).
I'm curious to see which iems you rank higher than others and which has better technicalities than others
I'm currently working on a list, but it's taking some time. I'll release an early version soon and update it as I go along.
Hi AT, you have mentioned your liking of the IE600 - how would you compare them to the IEMs in this review? I was a bit overwhelmed by the bass but found details really nice on the IE600. I also do like the comfort of them, I could not bear the Blessing 3 nozzle. Thanks for a message!
Hey there, I like the bass on the IE600 as well. Out of all the IEMs I mentioned in the video, I'd say the IE600 has the best bass. The SA6 MK II comes in a close second. It's a bit V-shaped but offers impressive detail retrieval and technicalities. It has more technicalities than the Studio 4 but less than the SA6 MK II. I love the IE600 for its unique, well-executed sound. Sometimes I want something that's not neutral but still sounds great, fun, and detailed enough for me to enjoy, and the IE600 fits that description perfectly. It's fantastic for rock, metal, and EDM. The Studio 4 is less detailed, more neutral, and has less bass. The SA6 MK II excels in technicalities, detail retrieval, clarity, and air, and it sounds wider too.
Hi Sir, Thank you for the comments! I‘d say then with the S4 offering less details lets the SA6 then be the one option. But considering your description of technicalities, the Pilgrim also seems better than the IE600, albeit soundstage maybe a tie from your elaboration. I have to admit I am unworthy of the 600’s base😅, so I likely can live with a more subtle lower end. Thank you in any case for your commentary!
interested in your tthoughts on Ultimate Ears universal 150
I haven't had the opportunity to listen to that IEM yet, so I can't comment on its sound. Hopefully, one day I will.
Im currently using tanchjim origin and I really ike this iem, a lot. My only complain is its poor noise isolation. Do you think Studio 4 is an upgrade over tanchjim origin? Id love to hear comparison between these two. Thanks in advance.
Yes, absolutely. The noise isolation of the Studio 4 is the best I've ever experienced. The big difference between them is the detail retrieval, instrument separation, and passive noise isolation.
@@Atechreviews what about soundstage? Is it wider than the origin?
@@jill4470 I would say they have similar soundstage.
Hi everyone i need an opinion which of this is better in terms to detail , Mega5est or Softears Studio 4 ... thanks
The Softears Studio 4 offers significantly better detail retrieval and instrument separation compared to the Mega5est. Yhe Mega5est is too laid-back and relaxed, the Blessing 3 and Studio 4 surpasse it in technicalities by a wide margin.
@@Atechreviews wow thank youu so much, new sub here fan of your videos , i think i fall in love with Mega5est after Dms's video, im trying to not buy it but i cant jsjsjsjsjs , other of my options is Elysian pilgrim , i really wanted to buy the Noir but after your video i change opinion jsjsjsjs, I/O Volare is other of my options but i think im now buying the Mega5est , i hope this are a UPGRADE above Pula 02 ,, Finally what you would like to buy if you were me , this are the options (Gizaudio Chopin - Aful Explorer - Hexa - Hidiz MP145) i just wanna now if you were me which should i buy i can afford all of them , no matter price or sound profile / eqs, just your opinion thank youuu 🥰
@@ErikaeeneI haven't tried the Hidiz MP145, but I do have the rest. Out of those, I would choose the Chopin. I think it's significantly better than the other options-truly a fantastic IEM.
How would you compare the Davinci to these? Especially imaging and soundstage based off its slightly recessed treble. Mostly curious as to how the Lites compare since they are the cheapest on the list.
The Studio 4 offers a significantly wider soundstage and much more accurate imaging, making a noticeable difference. The vocals and mid-range on the Studio 4 are also more forward without sounding shouty. Instruments are more clear and separated. Its treble is among the best I've ever heard in the under $1k category-very realistic, never splashy, harsh, or sibilant in any way. The vocals are natural and incredibly detailed. The Studio 4 has a neutral sound with neutral bass, while the DaVinci has strong bass that makes the lower mid-range sound warmer and fuller. The Studio 4 excels in mid-range, treble, soundstage, detail retrieval, instrument separation, sound isolation, and comfort. The Studio 4 sounds more neutral, accurate, and realistic to me while the DaVinci sounds much more fun.
@@Atechreviews Awesome, I'm just looking for a new set to upgrade to (BA Heavy) from my Lites, I also have the OG timeless but I was thinking of ditching the Lites as the shell is just too big, and getting the Davinci now since I have a good deal locally for 200$, and then in a month or 2, getting a slightly more end game set of either Studio 4s, Xenns Top, SA6 MK2, or Hype 4 maybe even the pilgrim I just don't like the connection they use. I listen to EDM and Rap so I don't mind heavy bass or treble, I just also want great imaging horizontally and vertically for FPS gameplay LOL. Any more advice helps a bunch. Amazing video btw
@@Tokubetsuu $200 for the Davinci sounds like a good deal. Here is my opinion on these IEMs based on my experience with them:
DaVinci: The bass actually helps recognize the sound of footsteps.
Studio 4s: Highly detailed sound and accurate neutral tuning, the best sound isolation. Never sharp or sibilant.
SA6 MK2: Excellent detail retrieval and airy sound signature. Wide sound stage and excellent pin point imaging both horizontally and vertically.
Hype 4: If you enjoy a fun, energetic sound with a strong bass presence.
Pilgrim: Excellent detail retrieval and separation, but average depth of soundstage and the connection might be a deal-breaker for you. Never sharp or sibilant.
@@Atechreviews Thank you sooo much for this. Just what I needed. Guess I might become a Dunu fanboy aswell.
@@Tokubetsuu Welcome to the club 😀
Did you experience any pressure build-up? That is something that I have experienced with a lot of BA IEMs, due to the lack of venting
I noticed this issue with the Kiwi Ears Orchestra Lite in my left ear and occasionally with the DUNU SA6 MK II using certain ear tips in my right ear. However, I've been using the Studio 4 for about a week, listening for many hours each day, and I haven't experienced it even once (even when pushing them in for a better fit). I mostly used DIVINUS Velvet ear tips. If you're sensitive to this kind of thing, I recommend demoing it first to see how it works for you.
Sancai ear tips work as well, as they’re able to naturally vent ear pressure with the textured silicone.
may i know what does pressure build mean here ?
@@faizduriat4427 Literally air pressure, you know when you yawn, and you feel that odd feeling in or ears, or airplanes when lifting or landing
I notice unnatural pressure a lot, from the very time I put them on. Something I get used to after a while, but it may be a contributing factor Studio4 is tiring for me in a longer run.
How does the studio4 compare with blessing2?
I prefer the Studio 4. It offers a more neutral and natural sound with enhanced detail and isolation. The Blessing 2, can feel slightly too much or overly energetic at times, especially with certain music genres. For me, the Studio 4 stands out on a different level compared to the Blessing 2, delivering a more natural, detailed sound without any harshness. Studio 4 is much more neutral, natural, and detailed.
@@Atechreviews thanks for the response, I only auditioned it briefly in an audio shop and it stood out on a first listen among other sets I demoed on that day. But I wasn't sure if my experience on this set was valid due to the listener fatigue.
@@wiesolos You're very welcome! It felt the same since the first listen. A truly exceptional IEM IMO.
Tri i3 mk3 tuning looks good , similar to studio 4, but little less 3k. For 200$
I will check it out. Thanks for the suggestion 👍
For me Studio4 is not that great. Yes, midrange is impressive initially, but tiring in a longer sessions. I'm scared to listen to them loud, because even if most of the sounds are on proper level, once in a while some random sound pearce my ears with its excessive loudness. I even changed the tips to small bore, and it improved a little bit Studo4's unpredictability. Yes, the soundstage is accurate, but to my ears it completely lacks depth - all sounds are on the 2D plane, not very far from my head (again small bore tips improved depth a bit). Buying theese I thought it would be my ultimate pair of neutral IEMs, but it turned out, their flaws are too big for my personal preference.
I still adore them and use them for at least an hour every day. I get a great seal with them, and since they're neutral to begin with, I've never had any sound issues, but I also don't listen loudly. This pair might not align with your preferences, and that's perfectly fine. :)
Better than the em10?
In my opinion, the EM10 can't be compared to the Studio 4. I reviewed the EM10 and shared my thoughts on it. After A/B comparing the EM10 with the Binary Chopin for a few days, I found the Binary Chopin sounds slightly better than the EM10. The EM10 is also marginally better than the Truthear Nova. However, the Studio 4 is in a completely different league. If you listen to them side by side, you'll be amazed by the massive difference. The Studio 4 offers significantly better detail retrieval, instrument separation, treble, vocal clarity, imaging, and soundstage width, providing a much higher quality sound overall. While the EM10 sounds good, I find it massively overpriced. Keep in mind, this is just my opinion.
broo..can u suggest me any budget iem under $20 for listening music and movies ..with good build quality
Moondrop Chu 2. Best IEM I heard under $20.
@@Atechreviews broo..what about TANGZU WANER AND KZ ZSN PRO 2..and no I'm doubting the build quality of tangzu waner.. please help me choos either of them...!!
@@Iem_crazerrr I have the Tangzu Waner, but I haven't had the chance to listen to or measure it yet. I'll compare it soon and keep you updated.
@@Atechreviews okay..thanks for the reply broo✌️✌️
Broo..also do best iems under $20 ..please broo .I too searched all the TH-cam videos..but I can't finalise one iem..🥲🥲
Please broo🙏🙏