The crowd pop for the third reversed goal is something incredible. That's legit hate at the same decibel level of a playoff game winning goal. I've never heard that lmao
Honestly I dont support throwing drinks and food on the ice since that can hurt someone but at least it shows that they care. As A leafs fan who literally went through some dark times as a child whos team stunk very rarely (till about 2012) would the fans react. IMO food and drink is no good (a full car of beer can seriously hurt someone and even kill them if its thrown hard enough) but i do think its fine to throw Jerseys.
I'm 99.99% sure that if you're a goaltender, you should TEND THE GOAL!! Edit: I'm pretty sure this is a record for the number of if you're a goaltender tend the goal dang-its in one video.
I despise called back goals like that when there was no penalty called. Like, the ref gave no shits until they scored. If it was goalie interference because he was body checked, that's a penalty. If you weren't going to call it, then the goal should stand. It's different if there's incidental contact in the crease. Which, speaking of, there's no way that first goal is called back. The contact has to be enough to prevent the save, and Murrey wasn't even close (plus, I believe it deflected, so he wouldn't have been able to save it without interfering with the devil player).
There was another play where marner got high sticked, went down on the ice and was there for a few seconds, play kept going even though the refs never signaled for a penalty, even the devils announcers said they never saw an arm up, play was blown dead and then a penalty was called
That was a hat pick. Just a good play by a veteren. Leafs might have taken the penalty kill there rather than have another minute in their zone with that exhausted group.
@@crispychris9492 The arm never went up. The linesman made the call on that one apparently. Not going to defend Marner's embellishments. On the other hand, Matthews doesn't embellish and gets comparatively few calls for a guy whose often fouled. I'm less outraged by embellishment than most fans (and not just when my team's players do it). I don't love it but it's one of the things that makes defenders have to be more tentative and I generally favor that.
@@crispychris9492 Horrible officiating all the way through. 3 goals called off made the crowd explode, but everyone saw how terrible they were all night.
The problem isn't that the goals were called off. The problem is that we have seen all of those exact types plays get called the other way repeatedly over the years. The NHLs calling of each one of these plays the kick included has been incredibly inconsistent. It's hard not to view the calls as 50/50 coin flips. So when the Devils have all 3 calls go against them there's not really any other way to feel but ripped off and cheated.
The thing for me is that in any game, any decision regarding each of the goals would've been relatively okay, 1st could've been counted or waived, 2nd counted or waived, 3rd counted or waived. But it's the fact that ALL THREE happened in one game that is astonishing. Even seeing others comments it's so divided amongst which are right and wrong. If any one of those goals were isolated, I dont think there would be any issue. It's just incredible they all happened together in one game, to end a 13 game win streak
Yeah, I'm with you. If there were one I would say should have counted, it's the second one, because like, what is Tatar supposed to do? He's skating behind the net, taking a line to not just plow right through Murray, and Murray just kinda acts like there's no one he should have to worry about avoiding, and by the time Tatar could see that there may be a problem he really doesn't have time to avoid contact. Based on that precedent, you might think goalies are gonna start trying to initiate contact with skaters behind their net after playing the puck because if they make a bad turnover, now they have a freebie because "I was interfered with".
@@craigcrawford6749 because the decisions are up to interpretation. The refs interpreted them as no goals but it was so 50/50 on each goal that they could have been interpreted as good goals. Try to imagine that it happened to your team. You would probably say those were all good goals
YOU MISSED DREW DOUGHTY LAUGHING IN DRAISAITLS FACE FOR MISSING A HIT, ONLY TO NOT COVER HIM AND GET SCORED ON, AND THEN DRAISAITL LAUGHED BACK IN HIS FACE
To be fair, it's the fault of the damn trapezoid behind the nets. Since they added this stupid rule, goalies have become less adept at handling the puck. I loved it when a guy like Brodeur would jump on a puck in the corner and snipe a pass center ice while the other team thought it was an icing call and would be taken by surprise. High risk high reward plays, allows to relaunch the attack quicker on the powerplay when the puck is cleared from the offensive zone.
@@hoozoohleague8264 goalies are much better controlling the puck than they used to be. It’s a skill they all work on. They just have little room and less time than ever to do it
@@johngould6628 they have a lot less opportunities to use the skill than they used to, and they have none to make big plays with it. 15years ago there wasn't this many goalies dang-its
Surprised there was no mention of the called back goal in the Canucks vs Avs game! I went from watching the NJD vs TOR game to that one, and I was worried it was groundhog day or something 😅
And if we're talking about the Canucks vs Avs games... another dang-it that could've made it is the bag of jelly beans that was thrown at Pettersson's head
Best part of the Stars comeback was that about 3 seconds before the Hawks scored their 4th goal, the Stars announcer goes "it just feels that if The Stars get one, they'll get confidence and have a chance." I went to bed immediately after that goal, thought he jinxed us, lol
idk man, Bastian barely makes any contact with Murray on that first NJD goal. it just didn’t feel like that was enough to impede Murray’s ability to stop that puck. dang-it of an interference call
YES that game was so difficult for me to watch because yeah i love my team but we just haven’t been doing it like we should be, that one goal tho really ticked me off
You missed the one where the Avs' Andreas Englund causes contact with his goaltender that results in the goal. Oh, sorry, not the Canes one, the one vs the Stars like two games later. He cross checked Jason Robertson into Georgiev which directly caused the puck to go in.
Yea I thought they were gonna naturally transition out of the "if you're a goaltender" segment to that one since they ended on the avs one. Not a good week for Englund I guess.
Not a good week for Englund is an understatement - lacking the situational awareness resulting in trying to get around but running his own goalie leading to a goal and then cross-checking a player into his own goalie for a counted goal. I don't know Avs' D sitch but Englund needs to visit the press box for a game.
Watching the bruins game and yelled “ if you’re a goal gender tend the goal” when Ullmark charged out at the puck and then he somehow won that battle I was shocked and will never question Ullmark again
Missed Jack Campbell gets hit by the puck one the puck, resulting a broken nose in game against devil last Monday, but was able to play eventho on Wednesday. Great video, always love dang it videos.
Screw the camera hole being out of bounds... that wouldn't be there except for a good shot, and when a puck hits it, we decide while there's glass everywhere else that hitting that spot is out of bounds? That dang it belongs to the NHL.
A great point, how many times have we seen goalies mailed by forwards only to have the goal count because they could reset or the puck was loose in the crease. This was a video game worthy bunch of BS and the league and almost all fans know it. Disgusting
Missed the "tripping" call on Lindholm in the Flames/Penguins game where even Crosby, who was "tripped" was visibly confused and arguing against the call. After multiple egregious missed calls on both sides.
Francouz said, after the game, that Englund called for him to leave the puck. Although, he said he decided to play it anyway. They were not on the same page. In your clip you can hear someone say "Leave it".
There were a lot of dang-it’s this week but you missed in my opinion the biggest dang-it which was the soft interference penalty on Cale Makar that lead to the game winning goal for the Canucks
That was pretty bad, but that whole game was pretty bad. There were several soft calls vs both teams one that led to a goal each way (the 4v4 off the Makar call, the 5v3 goal off the Miller "hook"), and the GI call that reversed the one goal was ridiculous. Then you had the bozo throwing candy at Pettersson. Could have had 5 or 6 dangits from that game.
The first and third call back for the devils were valid. The second one is up in the air, but the exact same thing happened AGAINST the devils in 2020 against the Avs and was called a goal
Haula was arguing he was kicking the puck to Bastian but went off the leaf defender knocking it in the net. Judgement call. IMO a bad one but I'm biased
As a tendy myself I would LOVE to tend the goal, problem is most coaches and some players always want us to make these insane mike smith level puck handling plays with little to zero amounts of puck practice
Kind of surprised that the goal by Faksa against the lightning wasn't in this. It was a shorthanded giveaway right infront of their own net that resulted in a game tying goal late in the third.
The funniest part of the NJ/TOR game was that TOR scored a goal earlier that should’ve been called back for goalie interference (pretty obvious) but it wasn’t. NJ got screwed a total of 4 TIMES lmao
I thought the sharks/red wings one was going to be the best of the week when I saw that one live, but now that I've seen the competition, I don't know that I've ever laughed this hard for one of these videos, great week!
Apparently many of the Metro (And a few Atlantic) teams have put a spell on mostly Canadian teams’ (+ a few) goalies. WOW. Watching the Isles/Leafs BOTH teams’ fans commented this. We knew you’d see.
The first one def should’ve counted, 2nd one was more debatable but still should’ve counted, third one I agree with, but it doesn’t matter at that point bc that would make it 3-2 nj
Can't believe Jack Cambell having his nose broken from the bench wasn't in the list because that's absolutely a dang it, the poor guy wasn't even playing that game
Idk about 'very'. Pretty obvious skate to skate contact as the goalie tries to shift left, and then the puck squeaks by on the same side he was trying to shift. Murray obviously wasnt trucked, but its clear he wasn't allowed to move where he wanted to move in his crease
@@incendiary6243 I’d say he was barely impeded in his movement to the side if at all. Even Murray thought it was a good goal since he didn’t even seem to think he was interfered with. Goalies usually go crazy when they believe they’re interfered with on a goal and he just hung his head thinking he just made a mistake
Neither goal should have counted, especially the Tatar one, and yes i agree, pathetic people throwing crap. Makes the whole fanbase look bad even though that doesn't represent all of them, but i like to think it's just mob mentality where all of those fans were upset about the goals so when they saw someone else throw something, their anger made them do it too.
First goal is the only questionable one. On the second one the rules state that the attacking player must make an effort to avoid contact in order for it to be a good goal.
NJ got absolutely screwed in 2/3 goals. 1st goal was hardly a bump. 2 goal goalie out of the crease is a fair player, he played the puck (he’s part of the play) and the Devils player was trying to skate by bumped him but again he was fair game I feel. 3rd goal ya it was kicked it. I’d be pissed as well if I were there watching that travesty of officiating in person
@@Gl-my8fw bullshit, watch games every day where those exact plays are called goals…the Avs vs Devils was the exact situation against the devils and it was allowed. Goalie leaves his crease the forward has every right to the ice as well. He didn’t hit him to keep him from getting back, Murray doesn’t own the path.
2 of the GIs that went against the devils probably should’ve counted, especially that last one with Tatar and Murray colliding given how Blackwood and an Avs player years ago had that happen and it counted against the devils.
Personal Dang-it...I was going to buy a ticket right behind the Hawks bench for that Hawks/Stars game. Couldn't complete the purchase because that was the day Taylor Swift broke Ticketmaster. By the time the site was back up, I was busy. Other plans came up and I had to miss the game. THAT'S a dang-it.
I'm by no means a rules expert. I'm as casual of a fan as it gets. Should the 2nd goal of counted? From my limited rules knowledge, the goalie was outside of the crease. Is that still interference?
@@devilsarebeastly According to which league? Certainly not the NHL, as nowhere does the NHL rulebook state that incidental contact outside of the crease is always a good goal.
1st goal was a good goal, second I mean he was way out of his crease and he isnt hologram or something for Tatar to go through him on speed and goalie played the puck
I gotta admit i would throw something on the ice if i was a devils fan at that game too, but why are they blaming toronto and flipping off the players as if they had any say in the call?
For the last two season of beer league I was on last place teams. At least 10x a night I was saying "That's a dang-it" as we would make a bad turnover. Luckily I wouldn't have to say the other line to our goalie, though I have yelled it at opposing goalies from time to time.
I'm convinced that goalies watch Steve Dangle... hear him scream "tend the goal", and then go "No way, b!tch, I'm gonna leave my net even MORE now!" And then they do, and then they get scored on, and Steve screams more.
I don’t know what’s worse. - that the Leafs can barely win when 3 goals get called off… - or that the Devils lost their streak to such an abomination of officiating… “Refs you suck!” 👌
I saw someone else say this and I agree with it. The goaltenders would be better at playing the puck if they were allowed to. The trapezoid is an unnecessary rule, and needs to be addressed
First two should have counted... 1st the "interference" impacted the save literally zero percent. The consistency across all games is AWFUL. 2nd the puck was actually going to miss the net until the goalie tipped it in and since no penalty was called on the play that should have counted. 3rd the rules clearly state a distinct kicking motion off ANY player will result in a no-goal so that was a good call.
I've seen examples of each of those calls against the devils going the other way. But hey, how else would the Maple leafs have wins against the Stars, Bruins and Devils if the refs called the game straight? Sports betting is a major source of income for the league, after all.
Bingo! That's what I say. The first two calls were BS. The Devils were on a win streak and I'm sure a lot of money was riding on them continuing against the faltering Leafs.
Leafs/Devils. I think the last 2 should have counted. Murray was well outside his area and the guy was trying to get past him as Murray slowly went back to the net. The last goal was unintentionally kicked to another player during a pileup.
Funny as always, Steve! That first goal in the hat-trick of goals called back shouldn't have been penalized. But the other two were clearly called for the right reasons.
Watch the behind the net play, when Murray is trying to get back. Tatar actually uses his arm to give in a subtle push either to get around Murray or to push him out of the way. Either way it's in that action it became a no goal.
I had a dang it yesterday at my game. My line ate was at the blue line trying to get a dump in/shot, and it bounced over the goalies glove, or deflected off his stick and went in. In the next minute he sniped it post and in to tie
The other place that's out of play that we didn't mention is in and on top of the net. Not only is there a stoppage if it is scored, but also if the puck lands on or otherwise enters the net through the side or back.
At many NCAA rinks, the ceiling is low enough that the puck will sometimes hit it or something that is hanging from the ceiling. Cornell's Lynah rink has *lots* of banners for various tournament wins (including the only undefeated, untied national championship in college hockey) and they're hit fairly often and deemed out of play.
The first two goals should have counted without a doubt. The devil's announcer pointing out a rule that allows for incidental contact on that second goal. It'd be nice if there is consistency and how the NHL rule on these matters
Bastian getting held HARD next to Murray in front of the leaf fan wearing stripes but being over looked SECONDS before the first disallowed goal is in fact a dang it
Honestly the worst part of the Toronto NJ game isn't the biased officiating or the fact that we lost, but the Toronto fans celebrating and trolling as though their team hadn't been trounced all over the ice. Shots were 35-20. Devils had 80% on the deserve-to-win-o-meter. Take the gift with some class.
My opinion on the Devils reviews: 1. Pretty clear cut goaltender interference. It's minor contact, but has a major effect on Murray's ability to move freely. No goal. 2. This play is the definition of incidental contact outside the crease. The Devils player doesn't stick his foot out or anything, their legs just make contact because Murray didn't notice the guy coming around the net, who had already committed to going between Murray and the net. Should have been a good goal. 3. No goal, as per the rulebook, but the rule is dumb. I think it should be: if the puck is on target when the puck leaves the kicking skate, no goal. If the puck is not on target when it leaves the kicking skate and is subsequently deflected into the net by anything on the ice, good goal.
"69.4 Contact Outside the Goal Crease - If an attacking player initiates any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed. A goalkeeper is not “fair game” just because he is outside the goal crease. The appropriate penalty should be assessed in every case where an attacking player makes unnecessary contact with the goalkeeper. However, incidental contact will be permitted when the goalkeeper is in the act of playing the puck outside his goal crease provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such unnecessary contact. When a goalkeeper has played the puck outside of his crease and is then prevented from returning to his crease area due to the deliberate actions of an attacking player, such player may be penalized for goalkeeper interference. Similarly, the goalkeeper may be penalized, if by his actions outside of his crease he deliberately interferes with an attacking player who is attempting to play the puck or an opponent." Tatar chose to cut between Murray and the net. They prevented Murray from returning to their crease. That is not a "reasonable effort" to avoid the contact and it was a "deliberate action" that prevented Murray from returning to his crease.
@@BoredDan7 To add to that 2nd goal, if you look at it closely, you can actually see that Tatar pushes Murray with his left arm. It would have been deemed incidental as he could have tried to avoid him to the best of his capacity, but by deliberately shoving Murray out of play, of course it was going to be no goal. However, I clearly agree on the 3rd goal that if there is kicking motion, but that the initial trajectory of the puck was not the net, it should count as a goal. Steve's video doesn't show the best angle possible for the review, but the puck was going on the complete opposite way of the net, until it hit Leafs' Robertson's skate which directed it into the net. Haula was most likely aiming the puck to his teammate crashing the net, not actually trying to kick the puck inside the net
@@CharlesABelair I disagree that Tatar pushes him with his arm. When you bump into someone shoulder to shoulder, it's natural for your arm to swing back like that. He *may* have pushed Murray, but there's very plausible deniability and I don't think you can base a call on that. Also if the refs thought he actually pushed him, they would have called a penalty and not just waived off the goal.
@@BoredDan7 Yes, Tatar chose to cut between Murray and the net, but looking at the play holistically, where else should Tatar have gone? As Tatar starts to go behind the net, he is clearly aware that Murray is there playing the puck. The puck is along the boards, and Murray had his body quite close to the boards as well, certainly close enough that there would be significant contact if a player tried to go between him and the boards. As such, Tatar cuts up ice and takes the inside line to avoid contact with Murray. Unless you were expecting Tatar to come to a full stop behind the net, or cut back to Murray's left on essentially 0 notice, I'm not sure what other reasonable effort he could have made to avoid the contact.
@@CharlesABelair Whether he intended to kick it in or not and whether he kicked it at the net or across does not matter. If a player kicks the puck and it deflects off another players body and in it's no goal. This is specifically mentioned in the rules. It's only a goal if it deflects off a stick that is not the goalies.
My favorite part about the gong show games is the people in the crowd filming side by side.. why? After the game you show your friends despite them having better camera angles than you had because they were watching at home...
Honestly, if the goalie is getting out of the blue paint to play the puck, and gets slammed down to the ice from a gentle breeze of another player, like the second called back goal, that should count. The goalie chose to leave his position, so he should count as a regular player
The crowd pop for the third reversed goal is something incredible. That's legit hate at the same decibel level of a playoff game winning goal. I've never heard that lmao
For real that game was crazy lol
Wait, it was a playoff game, right?
Honestly I dont support throwing drinks and food on the ice since that can hurt someone but at least it shows that they care. As A leafs fan who literally went through some dark times as a child whos team stunk very rarely (till about 2012) would the fans react. IMO food and drink is no good (a full car of beer can seriously hurt someone and even kill them if its thrown hard enough) but i do think its fine to throw Jerseys.
thats what happens when the refs ruin a chance at franchise history
Sorry were they going to break the record that night or was the record already broken?
I'm 99.99% sure that if you're a goaltender, you should TEND THE GOAL!!
Edit: I'm pretty sure this is a record for the number of if you're a goaltender tend the goal dang-its in one video.
Call it the if you're a goaltender tend the goal Emporium
@@alexanderthomas4011 YES!
Unless you are a Leafs goaltender, then the refs bail you out like in the 2nd Devils goal that didn't count.
I despise called back goals like that when there was no penalty called. Like, the ref gave no shits until they scored. If it was goalie interference because he was body checked, that's a penalty. If you weren't going to call it, then the goal should stand. It's different if there's incidental contact in the crease. Which, speaking of, there's no way that first goal is called back. The contact has to be enough to prevent the save, and Murrey wasn't even close (plus, I believe it deflected, so he wouldn't have been able to save it without interfering with the devil player).
The video where the Sabers had their 18 game losing streak is up there too, there were like 5 dang it's of not tending the goal
How did Matt Murray "accidentally" knocking the net off not get mentioned in either the LFR or this video? Oscar worthy performance that one was.
There was another play where marner got high sticked, went down on the ice and was there for a few seconds, play kept going even though the refs never signaled for a penalty, even the devils announcers said they never saw an arm up, play was blown dead and then a penalty was called
That was a hat pick. Just a good play by a veteren. Leafs might have taken the penalty kill there rather than have another minute in their zone with that exhausted group.
@@crispychris9492 The arm never went up. The linesman made the call on that one apparently. Not going to defend Marner's embellishments. On the other hand, Matthews doesn't embellish and gets comparatively few calls for a guy whose often fouled.
I'm less outraged by embellishment than most fans (and not just when my team's players do it). I don't love it but it's one of the things that makes defenders have to be more tentative and I generally favor that.
@@crispychris9492 Horrible officiating all the way through. 3 goals called off made the crowd explode, but everyone saw how terrible they were all night.
Right...
The problem isn't that the goals were called off. The problem is that we have seen all of those exact types plays get called the other way repeatedly over the years. The NHLs calling of each one of these plays the kick included has been incredibly inconsistent. It's hard not to view the calls as 50/50 coin flips. So when the Devils have all 3 calls go against them there's not really any other way to feel but ripped off and cheated.
If the goals called back are because of the rules don't cry you lost shut up
if the devils were playing the oilers when those 3 goals happen they would have all been good goals for devils.
@@aichicanadian lol 💯
every call was the correct call. fans should get over it
@@theseanie9958 the first one.. even though he was in the paint, Bastian never stopped Murray from going right to left lol.
The thing for me is that in any game, any decision regarding each of the goals would've been relatively okay, 1st could've been counted or waived, 2nd counted or waived, 3rd counted or waived. But it's the fact that ALL THREE happened in one game that is astonishing.
Even seeing others comments it's so divided amongst which are right and wrong.
If any one of those goals were isolated, I dont think there would be any issue. It's just incredible they all happened together in one game, to end a 13 game win streak
Yeah, I'm with you. If there were one I would say should have counted, it's the second one, because like, what is Tatar supposed to do? He's skating behind the net, taking a line to not just plow right through Murray, and Murray just kinda acts like there's no one he should have to worry about avoiding, and by the time Tatar could see that there may be a problem he really doesn't have time to avoid contact. Based on that precedent, you might think goalies are gonna start trying to initiate contact with skaters behind their net after playing the puck because if they make a bad turnover, now they have a freebie because "I was interfered with".
@@reaganharder1480 Tatar is supposed to go the long way not between the goalie and net.
How could they have been counted?
@@craigcrawford6749 because the decisions are up to interpretation. The refs interpreted them as no goals but it was so 50/50 on each goal that they could have been interpreted as good goals. Try to imagine that it happened to your team. You would probably say those were all good goals
I think they were one callback away from what would have been known as the "Jersey Riot."
YOU MISSED DREW DOUGHTY LAUGHING IN DRAISAITLS FACE FOR MISSING A HIT, ONLY TO NOT COVER HIM AND GET SCORED ON, AND THEN DRAISAITL LAUGHED BACK IN HIS FACE
This goalies not tending the net thing is becoming an epidemic
To be fair, it's the fault of the damn trapezoid behind the nets. Since they added this stupid rule, goalies have become less adept at handling the puck. I loved it when a guy like Brodeur would jump on a puck in the corner and snipe a pass center ice while the other team thought it was an icing call and would be taken by surprise. High risk high reward plays, allows to relaunch the attack quicker on the powerplay when the puck is cleared from the offensive zone.
@@hoozoohleague8264 goalies are much better controlling the puck than they used to be. It’s a skill they all work on. They just have little room and less time than ever to do it
@@johngould6628 they have a lot less opportunities to use the skill than they used to, and they have none to make big plays with it. 15years ago there wasn't this many goalies dang-its
Surprised there was no mention of the called back goal in the Canucks vs Avs game! I went from watching the NJD vs TOR game to that one, and I was worried it was groundhog day or something 😅
And if we're talking about the Canucks vs Avs games... another dang-it that could've made it is the bag of jelly beans that was thrown at Pettersson's head
Best part of the Stars comeback was that about 3 seconds before the Hawks scored their 4th goal, the Stars announcer goes "it just feels that if The Stars get one, they'll get confidence and have a chance." I went to bed immediately after that goal, thought he jinxed us, lol
idk man, Bastian barely makes any contact with Murray on that first NJD goal. it just didn’t feel like that was enough to impede Murray’s ability to stop that puck. dang-it of an interference call
he was in the crease and Murray couldn't even get completely to the butterfly due to him being in the way and the contact.
He couldn't move to his left like he wanted.
The puck was going wide anyway, and he was able to reset and make an attempted save. If all
Of them this was the most egregious in my opinion.
Good Danging, Steve - more are being created every week. We need you!!
Forgot another one from that Devils - Oilers game, where Stuart Skinner slipped and fell, letting Severson have an easy goal
YES that game was so difficult for me to watch because yeah i love my team but we just haven’t been doing it like we should be, that one goal tho really ticked me off
This is by far my favourite Dang It. I've watched it multiple times!! I've even convinced my Dad to watch it :)
You missed the one where the Avs' Andreas Englund causes contact with his goaltender that results in the goal.
Oh, sorry, not the Canes one, the one vs the Stars like two games later. He cross checked Jason Robertson into Georgiev which directly caused the puck to go in.
Yea I thought they were gonna naturally transition out of the "if you're a goaltender" segment to that one since they ended on the avs one. Not a good week for Englund I guess.
Not a good week for Englund is an understatement - lacking the situational awareness resulting in trying to get around but running his own goalie leading to a goal and then cross-checking a player into his own goalie for a counted goal. I don't know Avs' D sitch but Englund needs to visit the press box for a game.
England hasn't been in the line up since the incident vs Carolina and the first of 2 games against the Stars. Think the sent him back down to the ahl
You missed the dang it of Montreal with the sabers 3 goals in the first minute and Allen breaking his stick
It was 2 in the first minute. The third goal was about 2 and a half minutes into the game.
"Upon further review of the play, the puck magically turned into a camera lens, there should have been a whistle, therefor we have no goal."
Watching the bruins game and yelled “ if you’re a goal gender tend the goal” when Ullmark charged out at the puck and then he somehow won that battle I was shocked and will never question Ullmark again
Missed Jack Campbell gets hit by the puck one the puck, resulting a broken nose in game against devil last Monday, but was able to play eventho on Wednesday. Great video, always love dang it videos.
Missed Demko handing the golden Knights the puck on Monday night costing the Canucks the game.
For next week: Avs vs Dallas. Josh Manson gets high sticked…refs say “play stopped because of injury, but there was no injury so no penalty.”
You missed Mason shaw's goal from the wild jets game. You can see the panic unfold best in slow motion
Screw the camera hole being out of bounds... that wouldn't be there except for a good shot, and when a puck hits it, we decide while there's glass everywhere else that hitting that spot is out of bounds? That dang it belongs to the NHL.
1:45 Matt Calvert ran into Mackenzie Blackwood a few years ago in the exact same case and that goal counted lol
A great point, how many times have we seen goalies mailed by forwards only to have the goal count because they could reset or the puck was loose in the crease. This was a video game worthy bunch of BS and the league and almost all fans know it. Disgusting
Missed the "tripping" call on Lindholm in the Flames/Penguins game where even Crosby, who was "tripped" was visibly confused and arguing against the call. After multiple egregious missed calls on both sides.
Francouz said, after the game, that Englund called for him to leave the puck. Although, he said he decided to play it anyway. They were not on the same page. In your clip you can hear someone say "Leave it".
You missed Bouchard's own goal against the Islanders.
There were a lot of dang-it’s this week but you missed in my opinion the biggest dang-it which was the soft interference penalty on Cale Makar that lead to the game winning goal for the Canucks
That was pretty bad, but that whole game was pretty bad. There were several soft calls vs both teams one that led to a goal each way (the 4v4 off the Makar call, the 5v3 goal off the Miller "hook"), and the GI call that reversed the one goal was ridiculous. Then you had the bozo throwing candy at Pettersson. Could have had 5 or 6 dangits from that game.
Not a devils fan but thought they were completely screwed
The first and third call back for the devils were valid. The second one is up in the air, but the exact same thing happened AGAINST the devils in 2020 against the Avs and was called a goal
Haula was arguing he was kicking the puck to Bastian but went off the leaf defender knocking it in the net. Judgement call. IMO a bad one but I'm biased
As a tendy myself I would LOVE to tend the goal, problem is most coaches and some players always want us to make these insane mike smith level puck handling plays with little to zero amounts of puck practice
Kind of surprised that the goal by Faksa against the lightning wasn't in this. It was a shorthanded giveaway right infront of their own net that resulted in a game tying goal late in the third.
Last vid I think
I'm thankful for Steve's Dang Its
Happy non Canadian thanksgiving Steve!
The funniest part of the NJ/TOR game was that TOR scored a goal earlier that should’ve been called back for goalie interference (pretty obvious) but it wasn’t. NJ got screwed a total of 4 TIMES lmao
Not funny, messed up. Those refs should be fined
They were gonna break a franchise record
@@ethansiegel9445 NJ was playing against two Toronto teams. Ones in Jerseys and the other in polos reviewing plays
I thought the sharks/red wings one was going to be the best of the week when I saw that one live, but now that I've seen the competition, I don't know that I've ever laughed this hard for one of these videos, great week!
Apparently many of the Metro (And a few Atlantic) teams have put a spell on mostly Canadian teams’ (+ a few) goalies. WOW.
Watching the Isles/Leafs BOTH teams’ fans commented this. We knew you’d see.
The true dang it is the friends we made along the way. And also the fact that the bolts didn't play the bruins as well as they could've
I could literally hear Steve's voice in my head watching that Markstrom disaster live. Strong brand Steve. T-Shirts.
The first one def should’ve counted, 2nd one was more debatable but still should’ve counted, third one I agree with, but it doesn’t matter at that point bc that would make it 3-2 nj
The goal that got called back in the Avs/Canucks game was absolutely unreal. I was shook when they overturned it.
The Canuck player, literally was in the crease and kept the goalie's stick from playing the puck. Get out of his space.
@@jamesgrantham7281 the goalie used both hands to push him away and there was a deflection
Perfect set of dang-its! BTW…what sweater are you wearing?
Seriously
When Steve said “Get a bungee cord!” I cracked up!
Can't believe Jack Cambell having his nose broken from the bench wasn't in the list because that's absolutely a dang it, the poor guy wasn't even playing that game
I went to bed after the first 5 mins of the leafs devils game and boy did I miss a lot of waiting
5:32 They lost a 4-1 lead? Why are the Leafs wearing Blackhawk jerseys?
Everything about the Leafs/Devils game was a Dang-It. That being said, that first one called back was... very questionable, at best.
Idk about 'very'. Pretty obvious skate to skate contact as the goalie tries to shift left, and then the puck squeaks by on the same side he was trying to shift. Murray obviously wasnt trucked, but its clear he wasn't allowed to move where he wanted to move in his crease
but it was the only one that had some questinabiliyu to it other two were clear as day...
@@incendiary6243 I’d say he was barely impeded in his movement to the side if at all. Even Murray thought it was a good goal since he didn’t even seem to think he was interfered with. Goalies usually go crazy when they believe they’re interfered with on a goal and he just hung his head thinking he just made a mistake
Devils fan, 1st and 2nd goal both should have counted, but some “fans” should not have thrown stuff on the ice.
Nope.
Neither goal should have counted, especially the Tatar one, and yes i agree, pathetic people throwing crap. Makes the whole fanbase look bad even though that doesn't represent all of them, but i like to think it's just mob mentality where all of those fans were upset about the goals so when they saw someone else throw something, their anger made them do it too.
the first on was very clearly GI, the 2nd one was 50/50 on if you wanna blame murray for it or not
First goal is the only questionable one. On the second one the rules state that the attacking player must make an effort to avoid contact in order for it to be a good goal.
@@theseanie9958 Doesn't matter whether it was Murray's fault or not. It is on the attacking player to get out of the way.
NJ got absolutely screwed in 2/3 goals. 1st goal was hardly a bump. 2 goal goalie out of the crease is a fair player, he played the puck (he’s part of the play) and the Devils player was trying to skate by bumped him but again he was fair game I feel. 3rd goal ya it was kicked it. I’d be pissed as well if I were there watching that travesty of officiating in person
Those were clear and easy no goal calls to make.
@@Gl-my8fw bullshit, watch games every day where those exact plays are called goals…the Avs vs Devils was the exact situation against the devils and it was allowed. Goalie leaves his crease the forward has every right to the ice as well. He didn’t hit him to keep him from getting back, Murray doesn’t own the path.
@@marcviola30 just because there have been incorrect calls in the past dosent make this incorrect. They lost fairly just move on.
@@Gl-my8fw you’re probably one of those refs who made those bullshit calls
Oilers fan here...we feel your pain. We had something like 30 coaches challenges in a row not go our way.😆
Steve just solved the Stanley Cup equation for Calgary! “Get a bungee cord.” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I like the think Englund was yelling "Tend the GOAL!" as he drilled his own tendy.
The arena playing "Sabotage" while it's fans completely chimp-out over correct overturns is a rough look lol
we have been waiting all week for this!
10:42 the best part of this goalie-bashing commentary.. is that it's 3-time Stanley Cup winning goaltender Chris Osgood.
Oh boy, that's a dang it.
That intro though. 😂
I said the very same thing in the comments of the latest weird NHL collection,and I'm proud to say it
If youre a goaltender,TEND THE FREAKING GOAL!!!!
recommendation. You should make a end of season best dangits of all season. Same for the hat picks
Imagine being gifted 3 disallowed goals and still almost losing
What is "almost losing?" There was only one true goal scored on the Leafs that game
What is "almost losing?" There was only one true goal scored on the Leafs that game
2 of the GIs that went against the devils probably should’ve counted, especially that last one with Tatar and Murray colliding given how Blackwood and an Avs player years ago had that happen and it counted against the devils.
Personal Dang-it...I was going to buy a ticket right behind the Hawks bench for that Hawks/Stars game. Couldn't complete the purchase because that was the day Taylor Swift broke Ticketmaster. By the time the site was back up, I was busy. Other plans came up and I had to miss the game. THAT'S a dang-it.
I'm by no means a rules expert. I'm as casual of a fan as it gets. Should the 2nd goal of counted? From my limited rules knowledge, the goalie was outside of the crease. Is that still interference?
According to the league incidental contact outside the crease means it's a good goal (see Steve's example in the LFR from last years Avs Devils game)
Goalies in hockey are like Quarterbacks in American Football. Overprotected and always get the call in their favor.
@@AM-3.4 so if it wasn't a penalty... then it's a good goal?
@@devilsarebeastly According to which league? Certainly not the NHL, as nowhere does the NHL rulebook state that incidental contact outside of the crease is always a good goal.
@@MarisZadinans No, goaltender interference penalty and goaltender interference disallowed goal are two different things.
1st goal was a good goal, second I mean he was way out of his crease and he isnt hologram or something for Tatar to go through him on speed and goalie played the puck
I gotta admit i would throw something on the ice if i was a devils fan at that game too, but why are they blaming toronto and flipping off the players as if they had any say in the call?
because angry sports fans.
Probably cause they were winning. Idk
what ever happened to the any angle camera that I see commercials for all the time or was that just a phone sub thing?
For the last two season of beer league I was on last place teams. At least 10x a night I was saying "That's a dang-it" as we would make a bad turnover. Luckily I wouldn't have to say the other line to our goalie, though I have yelled it at opposing goalies from time to time.
I'm convinced that goalies watch Steve Dangle... hear him scream "tend the goal", and then go "No way, b!tch, I'm gonna leave my net even MORE now!"
And then they do, and then they get scored on, and Steve screams more.
The refs did a dang it by disallowing Garlands goal against the Avs the other day.
I don’t know what’s worse.
- that the Leafs can barely win when 3 goals get called off…
- or that the Devils lost their streak to such an abomination of officiating…
“Refs you suck!” 👌
☝️😭🖕
Happy Thanksgiving steve dangle
I saw someone else say this and I agree with it. The goaltenders would be better at playing the puck if they were allowed to. The trapezoid is an unnecessary rule, and needs to be addressed
First two should have counted...
1st the "interference" impacted the save literally zero percent. The consistency across all games is AWFUL.
2nd the puck was actually going to miss the net until the goalie tipped it in and since no penalty was called on the play that should have counted.
3rd the rules clearly state a distinct kicking motion off ANY player will result in a no-goal so that was a good call.
Refs robbed the Devils that game
I've seen examples of each of those calls against the devils going the other way. But hey, how else would the Maple leafs have wins against the Stars, Bruins and Devils if the refs called the game straight? Sports betting is a major source of income for the league, after all.
Bingo! That's what I say. The first two calls were BS. The Devils were on a win streak and I'm sure a lot of money was riding on them continuing against the faltering Leafs.
My buddy was at the Avs v Canes game and people were yelling "If your a goaltender tend the goal" after that happened!
The fact the defense can nullify a LEGAL cross-crease kick pass by putting the puck in their own net is SHAMBOLIC!
As an oilers fan that game was brutal to watch
I forgot for a second it’s not Thanksgiving today up there today. At first I was like, “Dude is DEDICATED!!”
I KNEW the NJD review would be there
As soon as I saw the Stars vs Blackhawks highlights, I knew it was going to be on Dang Its.
If you’re a netminder, mind the net!…. Wait…
Sounds fancier!
Definitely more British
Leafs/Devils. I think the last 2 should have counted. Murray was well outside his area and the guy was trying to get past him as Murray slowly went back to the net. The last goal was unintentionally kicked to another player during a pileup.
Nah if any of them shouldn’t have counted it would’ve been the last one. He kicks it intentionally and the puck ends up in the net. No goal.
Happy Thanksgiving steve
Funny as always, Steve! That first goal in the hat-trick of goals called back shouldn't have been penalized. But the other two were clearly called for the right reasons.
Watch the behind the net play, when Murray is trying to get back. Tatar actually uses his arm to give in a subtle push either to get around Murray or to push him out of the way. Either way it's in that action it became a no goal.
Rymer watched last week Kochetkov`s poke check and went "hold my stick":)
I had a dang it yesterday at my game. My line ate was at the blue line trying to get a dump in/shot, and it bounced over the goalies glove, or deflected off his stick and went in. In the next minute he sniped it post and in to tie
The other place that's out of play that we didn't mention is in and on top of the net. Not only is there a stoppage if it is scored, but also if the puck lands on or otherwise enters the net through the side or back.
At many NCAA rinks, the ceiling is low enough that the puck will sometimes hit it or something that is hanging from the ceiling. Cornell's Lynah rink has *lots* of banners for various tournament wins (including the only undefeated, untied national championship in college hockey) and they're hit fairly often and deemed out of play.
The biggest dangit is not putting Marian Hossa’s jersey retirement in hat picks!!!!
fair, but then he'd have to put hossa praising coach Q in dang-its
The first two goals should have counted without a doubt. The devil's announcer pointing out a rule that allows for incidental contact on that second goal. It'd be nice if there is consistency and how the NHL rule on these matters
Bastian getting held HARD next to Murray in front of the leaf fan wearing stripes but being over looked SECONDS before the first disallowed goal is in fact a dang it
Hellebuyuck should've gotten an assist on that goal.
Honestly the worst part of the Toronto NJ game isn't the biased officiating or the fact that we lost, but the Toronto fans celebrating and trolling as though their team hadn't been trounced all over the ice. Shots were 35-20. Devils had 80% on the deserve-to-win-o-meter. Take the gift with some class.
As a tender… I tend to tend the goal at all times. That’s my crease… I stay there and you stay out. Ask Battling Billy.
Aw you didn't talk about the Makar "Interference" penalty against the Canucks when he went to poke check lol
I saw Frankie and Englund collide and said “dang it,” only to watch the Canes score. I love predicting dang its.
I feel like once Steve started shouting it goalies started doing it exponentially more
I came here for the Hellebuyck dang-it. I watched the game and when I saw him do that, I knew it was going to make the list. 😆
My opinion on the Devils reviews:
1. Pretty clear cut goaltender interference. It's minor contact, but has a major effect on Murray's ability to move freely. No goal.
2. This play is the definition of incidental contact outside the crease. The Devils player doesn't stick his foot out or anything, their legs just make contact because Murray didn't notice the guy coming around the net, who had already committed to going between Murray and the net. Should have been a good goal.
3. No goal, as per the rulebook, but the rule is dumb. I think it should be: if the puck is on target when the puck leaves the kicking skate, no goal. If the puck is not on target when it leaves the kicking skate and is subsequently deflected into the net by anything on the ice, good goal.
"69.4 Contact Outside the Goal Crease - If an attacking player initiates
any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the
goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal
will be disallowed.
A goalkeeper is not “fair game” just because he is outside the goal
crease. The appropriate penalty should be assessed in every case
where an attacking player makes unnecessary contact with the
goalkeeper. However, incidental contact will be permitted when the
goalkeeper is in the act of playing the puck outside his goal crease
provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid
such unnecessary contact.
When a goalkeeper has played the puck outside of his crease and
is then prevented from returning to his crease area due to the
deliberate actions of an attacking player, such player may be
penalized for goalkeeper interference. Similarly, the goalkeeper may
be penalized, if by his actions outside of his crease he deliberately
interferes with an attacking player who is attempting to play the puck
or an opponent."
Tatar chose to cut between Murray and the net. They prevented Murray from returning to their crease. That is not a "reasonable effort" to avoid the contact and it was a "deliberate action" that prevented Murray from returning to his crease.
@@BoredDan7 To add to that 2nd goal, if you look at it closely, you can actually see that Tatar pushes Murray with his left arm. It would have been deemed incidental as he could have tried to avoid him to the best of his capacity, but by deliberately shoving Murray out of play, of course it was going to be no goal.
However, I clearly agree on the 3rd goal that if there is kicking motion, but that the initial trajectory of the puck was not the net, it should count as a goal. Steve's video doesn't show the best angle possible for the review, but the puck was going on the complete opposite way of the net, until it hit Leafs' Robertson's skate which directed it into the net. Haula was most likely aiming the puck to his teammate crashing the net, not actually trying to kick the puck inside the net
@@CharlesABelair I disagree that Tatar pushes him with his arm. When you bump into someone shoulder to shoulder, it's natural for your arm to swing back like that. He *may* have pushed Murray, but there's very plausible deniability and I don't think you can base a call on that. Also if the refs thought he actually pushed him, they would have called a penalty and not just waived off the goal.
@@BoredDan7 Yes, Tatar chose to cut between Murray and the net, but looking at the play holistically, where else should Tatar have gone? As Tatar starts to go behind the net, he is clearly aware that Murray is there playing the puck. The puck is along the boards, and Murray had his body quite close to the boards as well, certainly close enough that there would be significant contact if a player tried to go between him and the boards. As such, Tatar cuts up ice and takes the inside line to avoid contact with Murray. Unless you were expecting Tatar to come to a full stop behind the net, or cut back to Murray's left on essentially 0 notice, I'm not sure what other reasonable effort he could have made to avoid the contact.
@@CharlesABelair Whether he intended to kick it in or not and whether he kicked it at the net or across does not matter. If a player kicks the puck and it deflects off another players body and in it's no goal. This is specifically mentioned in the rules. It's only a goal if it deflects off a stick that is not the goalies.
Next time my goal tending coach suggests I play the puck more, I'll point to this video and say "Nah, I'm staying in my crease dude."
was expecting to see the play where jack cambell takes a puck to the face sitting on the bench
My favorite part about the gong show games is the people in the crowd filming side by side.. why?
After the game you show your friends despite them having better camera angles than you had because they were watching at home...
Honestly, if the goalie is getting out of the blue paint to play the puck, and gets slammed down to the ice from a gentle breeze of another player, like the second called back goal, that should count. The goalie chose to leave his position, so he should count as a regular player
not to mention HE moved into the NJ player, not the other way around.