We've had plenty of lousy presidents in American history. We'll survive this guy, as well. His ideas are so goofy, it's hard to know where to start. I sense largely a repeat of GW 2nd term. It will start falling apart early, then he'll lose the House in 2026 and be a true lame duck. I also sense a recession about 2 years down the road that will largely finish him off.
Then you will be far more behind in all aspects from China. All countries work together can achieve much more benefits to the world, instead of zero-sum game.
@@guydreamr It is your country, who set China as adversary, instead of China. China has been never ever so hostile to USA. Just because China bothers your hegemony?
@@kshen7485 Which assumes that China is looking to "work together," and is not itself engaging in a zero-sum game. Are you enjoying liking your own comments by the way?
yes , who need their holding of hundred of Billions of US treasury IOU from the US congregational research service , the official research center of the US congress " U.S. investors held $361 billion in PRC(mainland China and Hong Kong) securities; PRC total holdings of U.S. securities, excluding PRC offshore holdings, were $1.8 trillion. The PRC was the second-largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasuries ($1.0 trillion)
Well, my prediction is that it'll be a total disaster. Don't believe me; it's just a hunch.
That hoodie and the sport coat 😂
C’mon man
Interesting fashion statement
We've had plenty of lousy presidents in American history. We'll survive this guy, as well. His ideas are so goofy, it's hard to know where to start. I sense largely a repeat of GW 2nd term. It will start falling apart early, then he'll lose the House in 2026 and be a true lame duck. I also sense a recession about 2 years down the road that will largely finish him off.
Factually grounded. The Fall of Civilization is nigh.
I'd like to see more distance from China going forward.
Yes, why should the US continue to benefit and enrich an adversary nation?
Then you will be far more behind in all aspects from China. All countries work together can achieve much more benefits to the world, instead of zero-sum game.
@@guydreamr It is your country, who set China as adversary, instead of China. China has been never ever so hostile to USA. Just because China bothers your hegemony?
@@kshen7485 Which assumes that China is looking to "work together," and is not itself engaging in a zero-sum game. Are you enjoying liking your own comments by the way?
yes , who need their holding of hundred of Billions of US treasury IOU
from the US congregational research service , the official research center of the US congress
" U.S. investors held $361 billion in PRC(mainland China and Hong Kong) securities;
PRC total holdings of U.S. securities, excluding PRC offshore holdings, were $1.8 trillion.
The PRC was the second-largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasuries ($1.0 trillion)
an aged man in a hoodie with a sports jacket. the alternative political pundit uniform
Your backyard has fire. American voters ask Trump to care about their own land, instead of punching above the weight.
Ah, the “red herring fallacy” his sympathies are at work, “speech writers”, with logic.
"Gulf of America"
LoL.
本脳多邉世里壁鍋？
Will NATO hold together if the United States invades Greenland? Lol
😂 Even just threatening another NATO country sort of puts the alliance in question.
@aleaiactaest8354 don't tell Putin that
No. That's the point.
@@ReclinedPhysicist ohh he knows. Don't think European countries realise it (yet).
Gosh...not like he can build a golf course there.