@@Whiteack_Mapper hey i got an idea for the next video but you dont have to do it i was thinking after i saw this video about russia and the United States of America against the whole world but still great video man!
@@MakriaMicronation I know. This is just a joke because Hitler was an Austrian artist. I wrote exactly “Adolf Stalin” with an obvious reference because this is a different person
honestly, i think the rest of the world would've decided to end the war if the US had threatened with nukes to save the world from massive nuclear attacks and if not I dont think the world coalition could've continued past central america or northern Canada due to its geography.
Nah , you can re draw the geography with artillery and air strikes, but talking seriously , when you have that amount of air superiority, artillery and men, inevitably the defenses will fall at some point , due for troops exhaustion or lack of supplies , cuz hard terrain makes logistics hell for both sides,
@@cosmicsword2585america is good with logistics and idk how developed Colombian transport is but I sure as fuck know there is zero infrastructure in northern canada
@infamous_richard8732 talking serious, the world wouldn't care because they outnumber the US by 7 billion, even china under mao wanted a nuclear war with America because at the end of the day they would still outnumber the Americans, so imagine the world giving a f**k about nukes when humanity has gone through worst
The scariest thing about this is, the numbers might not be too far off. To subjugate a 330 million person strong culture where there are 120 guns per 100 people, you would need numbers the eastern front of WWII couldn't even compare to. And even with steamrolling levels of numbers, it still wouldn't be easy. Our geography is so in our favor that it would be a true nightmare for any invading force to traverse, wether it be the multiple mountain ranges on the western half, the numerous rivers to cross in the Mississippi river heartland, or the Appalachians of the east. And that doesn't even mention the initial challenges crossing the border. The coast range from the Salish sea to Los Angeles, the baren deserts along the border with Mexico, the Rio Grande river, the great plains in the north where there's nothing for literally hundreds of miles, the great lakes funneling any Invasion force into cities where its easy to make a hard point, and the coast from Texas to New York where its a double layered coastline the entire way making a beachhead landing almost impossible. I would like to see another country try to touch the contiguous 48. And that doesn't even mention other factors like our nuclear weapons, natural and underground resources, intelligence, and the fact that the Interstate system was designed with military movements in mind. And all of that is only defensive, I'm not gonna get into offense capabilities since this comment is already long enough, but like defensive, it's terrifying... Needless to say, if you don't have literally the entire rest of the world on your side... Don't Mess With The United States Of America.
@@cenk.3467I think they meant how the USA used to be portrayed as a hero in ww1 and ww2 cause they saved western europe from being under Soviet control.
If this happened I think Russia would gain Alaska, since they were the ones who invaded it back and probably those who did most of the work on the West Canadian front, they’d probably be putting MASSIVE pressure during negociations to get it back, especially using their historical claim to their advantage, just like they got Koenigsberg.
no. it would realistically make no sense for russia to take it, since russian culture is practically extinct there. alaska is culturally much more similar to canada which is why they'd become part of canada. russia really gave up their claim after they sold it, so i'm not sure if they would want to take it, especially with the resistance they'd face. also, you're confused about koenigsberg/kaliningrad. the city was always german, and the reason the soviets got it was out of blatant imperialism really. overall i don't think the russians would have as much sway over the world (especially after it fully mobilized) to realize any claim they had on alaska, and that's even if they try for it
@user-dable_bust3107 He has a point in that linguistically and culturally it would be easier for us Canadians to govern. Russia knows the importance of that given what happened with the Warsaw Pact. That said, I do think Russia could be rewarded here with resource and basing rights in Alaska. Would be in the interest of the arctic countries to work together.
@@nolan3312 Yes, koenigsberg was 100% German, as it was literally where modern Germany formed (Prussia), they had no real reason to get it, but still did because it was right at their border and they wanted to secure some German lands for themselves correctly, this is why I believe they’d still want Alaska. Also it doesn’t matter if Russian culture is gone there, they’ll just deport everyone to somewhere else and put Russians in their place, just like they did for Kaliningrad.
Although I find it highly unlikely that the naval invasions of Alaska and the Yucatan peninsula go successfully, otherwise this is pretty realistic. Also, I find it very unlikely that any advances are made during the nuclear winter. Good video, however!
What baffled me the most was South American forces pushing right past Panama like it was nothing. Realistically you would have such a massive advantage simply holding that canal alone- it doesn't matter if it stands or is blown apart, I believe it would have been a remarkably difficult feat
Nice done, could you make the same scenario but this time in 1945? It would be interesting to see how long the US could conquer with less powerful countries (Except for the USSR)
I am impressed. This is one of the best videos on the channel. It turned out very epic. I'm surprised that you still have so few subscribers. I think it would be a good idea to make a video "NATO VS the world" soon. This war will be even more massive. Perhaps in this case there will be countries on NATO’s side that could to join there🇺🇦🇬🇪🇧🇦🇮🇱
@@noidea-cj8mn They would fight against Russia, China, the entirety of Asia, the entirety of Africa, all of Oceania, the entirety of Latin America and some european countries who haven't joined NATO, if they win it would be using nukes.
The only possible winning for america is a white peace where the ANS manages to take over the whole american continent and increasing the available manpower with the population living in poor occupied regions with fake promises of citizenship, prosperity and peace; also would be key destinating resources for development proyects and fighting the crime in order to earn the people's will. So the entire continent would be a huge and well-armed fortress with millions of defenders [Of course, this is the most optimistic scenario just have fun with this content!]
It’s also hilarious that there would be troops left over to continue the fight against the U.S. after a nuclear first strike. 1) The US has enough nuclear weapons to end the world several times over. 2) If the US really did strike first, it would have struck all enemy nuclear stockpiles first, highly limiting any nuclear response. Also, a nuclear retaliation would be highly limited due to the lack of maintenance Russian and Chinese nuclear weapons receive. If given a first strike, the US would have a huge advantage in a nuclear war. The only countries that could legitimately respond with nuclear weapons in this case are Britain and France, and their stockpiles are very limited, allowing US air defenses more of an opportunity to shoot them down.
The nuclear weapons in the US arsenal wouldn't be anywhere near enough to end the world, nor would the combined nuclear arsenals of all the world's nations. There'd probably be a climate disaster, famine, tons of major cities would be destroyed and the devastation would be immeasurable but every powerful nation, including the US, has taken massive steps to ensure they're still militarily capable after a nuclear attack. If the US fired all its warheads at Russia even in the peak Cold War when they had many times more nuclear weapons than they do today, it'd still be capable enough to attack the US albeit weakened a lot, however the US would suffer the same issue when the warheads hit American soil. In this scenario it's not just Russia but the entire world and all their cities and warheads, plus the US arsenal is much more limited in comparison to 50 years ago. The US can't wipe out enough military personnel and installations to prevent an invasion if their targets are literally every military in the entire world outside North America. Also the other nations have their own highly advanced air defences and early detection systems (though the US is probably the most ready for a potential nuclear strike) so I doubt a retaliatory response would be limited much, if at all.
you missed something very important you missed the u.s bases edit: also how the hell does the world shit out 300+ aircaft carriers when china the closest to being2nd is struggling to make them
What happen usa overseas territory in pacific is they are still us territory or independet and also is russia gain from alaska island like aleutian islands Edit: good video ❤
Even if the U.S went up against the world it would still take a long time for the U.S to fall mostly because it has the largest military and some of the most advanced weapons of warfare.
@@europegaming6384 Most of which are not in north/south america. It'd take months for them to break the US navy enough to begin putting Men in the Americas
Hi. Corvettes are classified as warships. They are medium-sized and lightly armored warships. They are usually smaller than frigates. They are fast and highly maneuverable ships. Their missions include coastal security, patrol, maritime surveillance, and defense against naval targets. They are characterized by light armor, powerful weapon systems, and generally low costs. They provide additional firepower to destroyers and frigates during combat. Corvettes are generally capable of detecting and operating in tasks related to submarines.
A lot of American in the comment to say how they would "win", like wtf guys, it's the all world, and i read a lot of comment, a lot of point are forgotten that invalidate them ❤
Mexico, the carribean and Central America would fall quickly, also the Panama canal being cut off combined with america no longer participating in the world economy would basically force many nations to end the war
Man I was actually suprised while watching that nuclear weapond weren't used, that perhaps the world wouldn't end. And then 6:50 happened and all hope was lost. Now billions will die.
Not against the rest of the world including each and every one of their NATO allies, combined. Your username sounds Lithuanian, you must imagine a situation where you would rather fight with Russia than the US. That would be the unrealistic part. Beating the US after that though, with literally the whole world against them, would be easy.
The USA might be quite a strong country but you do know that every other country is not fully mobilized, like even Russia isn't fully mobilized. If China were to fully mobilize in about 10 years, they'd be 2x stronger than a fully mobilized America. This is due to the sheer workforce and land for factories that China has compared to America.
i think that south america wouldnt even able to launch a counter attack the only people capable of fighting back would be russia and china who would probably be washed, cool animation though
I’d love to know what other nations “stealth aircraft” are. At the vary best, they could match what the U.S. had 40 years ago. Nothing compared to what they have now.
there is just 2 main inconsistencies, canada army would not fall that quick by any means, and us cant invade mexico like it did from the west, that zone of mexico its a gogistical nightmare all mountens and verry deep zones taht would not allow the us to take that route, it can invade the coast with ships and take veracruz to attempt to take a shortcut threw puebla to mexico city but that other route its imposible, also they could not sustain 2 fronts that large like that, and its not because they dont have the tech but rather because the rea its extremely large and the army personel would not be sufficient
What I would really think would happen is that an attrition war would break out. The USA wouldn't have the resources to maintain the occupation of Mexico and Canada both at once. The world directly invading the USA wouldn't also go that well, and it would be a very risky move.
very good effort and video, its just that the armies move way too unrealistically past 7:08 nothing makes sense like did russian soldiers just gain superspeed and blitz through all of the frozen tundra of nunavut and why did the american army disappear every once in a while in the southern front you cant get pushed back THAT far then stabilize the line again hundreds of times.... and i dont think i need to explain why encircling the entire united states in a smooth box is unrealistic. again great effort but u should look at mapping videos of real scenarios for practice
@@Whiteack_Mapper i didnt mean it was just russian soldiers its just since there was a naval invasion of alaska and i assumed it began in russia but thats besides my point, and when i said the american army disappeared i mean the world army advanced really far into mexico all of a sudden and then stopped, and it seemed like all american forces just stopped fighting since you cant get pushed back that far then stabilize again
How the usa actually conquered countries despite the giant war against everyone (my theories) The Armies of the world needed to get to Canada, and travel takes time. So the USA could go through Canada with minimal resistance. Canada didn't want people to die. So they surrendered, decreasing the time needed for the invasion. Mexico was weakened by bombings. The usa had a more powerful army in this simulation than in real life, and the world had less countries fighting for it, while the USA had more land, so it could invade the carribean. Central America had been destroyed by attack helicopters. Greenland is useless, so it was instantly given up.
Let me remind you that the USA is a superpower. Of course, the USA could invade so many countries as in the video. But when all the countries in the world are in alliance, the USA would lose.
usa is strong and hard to invade because once you invade all of the population will fight to last man which means over 300 million people with guns imagine invading a country with 300 million "soldiers" who have guns
@@Yisraelamundas nope if usa was ever in war and "invaded" most americans would side with the current government and fight for their own rights then be oppressed by puppet government by foreign power
@@LazzieMazzienot a regime trying to take over the world, also Americans are all about freedom. Finally; the U.S. is easily the numerator in terms of their population to the whole world.
Do you think America is invincible or something? At least hundreds of millions military aged men would be invading maybe even a billion active if there was a forced conscription. You’re navy and air force would eventually cripple after being shot down and destroyed and we probably lose millions but in reality there’s hundreds of millions of men ready to storm America both west and east. America would have no chance against the world
I feel like that the war would end in a huge stalemate. Canada falls immediately and Mexico soon after. North America is held strong, and some pacific islands are taken too. Where the real battle is going to happen is the naval and military bases. I’d imagine America would use its vast military in the Middle East to seize as many oil reserves as they can and starve the world out, forcing peace.
Afghna didn't win because their army was strong, but because usa's army and commanders weren't prepared for Afghanistan territory. The same with Vietnam
From 2:48 to 3:14, the date is shown as 2024 instead of 2026. Sorry for this mistake.
Hehe it's okay
@@w.e_does_edits 😁
It's ok everyone does false things😮
@@Whiteack_MapperI need usa vs mexico pleaseeeeeeeeeee
@@Whiteack_Mapper hey i got an idea for the next video but you dont have to do it i was thinking after i saw this video about russia and the United States of America against the whole world but still great video man!
Some Canadian didn't get into art school.
Adolf Stalin 🌚
@@La_ma.His last name was hitler not stalin
@@MakriaMicronationhe was refering to a combination of Adolf and Stalin
@@MakriaMicronation I know. This is just a joke because Hitler was an Austrian artist. I wrote exactly “Adolf Stalin” with an obvious reference because this is a different person
Crazy
When the Canadian musician gets rejected from music school.
💀
DRAKE????
Stolen
@@joenuts5610drakeoffc russian streamer poshalko
Realistically, the war would have ended as soon as the nukes started flying
Probably someone in the U.S. would end up assassinating the leader and replacing him with a new one.
Also realistically, there would be no winners because the 2 sides nuked each other
there is no way they will advance that easily through the arctic and they cant really advance in usa because of the nuclear war
@@DZam-ct8egWinning a nuclear war is impossible
@@Boid_IDI mean,no US nukes would land because the US has less nukes and planes,than,well,the entire world.
honestly, i think the rest of the world would've decided to end the war if the US had threatened with nukes to save the world from massive nuclear attacks and if not I dont think the world coalition could've continued past central america or northern Canada due to its geography.
Nah , you can re draw the geography with artillery and air strikes, but talking seriously , when you have that amount of air superiority, artillery and men, inevitably the defenses will fall at some point , due for troops exhaustion or lack of supplies , cuz hard terrain makes logistics hell for both sides,
@@cosmicsword2585 True true, it would be extremely bloody
@@cosmicsword2585america is good with logistics and idk how developed Colombian transport is but I sure as fuck know there is zero infrastructure in northern canada
@infamous_richard8732 talking serious, the world wouldn't care because they outnumber the US by 7 billion, even china under mao wanted a nuclear war with America because at the end of the day they would still outnumber the Americans, so imagine the world giving a f**k about nukes when humanity has gone through worst
Adam Hilt:
American painter🇺🇸🎨🖌️
Would be canadian painter, because it's the same that austria and germany.
@@Megalosaurus343 omg lol
They reached my city and annexed it
@@Megalosaurus343how about canadian hockey player
Mexican painter
The scariest thing about this is, the numbers might not be too far off. To subjugate a 330 million person strong culture where there are 120 guns per 100 people, you would need numbers the eastern front of WWII couldn't even compare to. And even with steamrolling levels of numbers, it still wouldn't be easy. Our geography is so in our favor that it would be a true nightmare for any invading force to traverse, wether it be the multiple mountain ranges on the western half, the numerous rivers to cross in the Mississippi river heartland, or the Appalachians of the east. And that doesn't even mention the initial challenges crossing the border.
The coast range from the Salish sea to Los Angeles, the baren deserts along the border with Mexico, the Rio Grande river, the great plains in the north where there's nothing for literally hundreds of miles, the great lakes funneling any Invasion force into cities where its easy to make a hard point, and the coast from Texas to New York where its a double layered coastline the entire way making a beachhead landing almost impossible.
I would like to see another country try to touch the contiguous 48.
And that doesn't even mention other factors like our nuclear weapons, natural and underground resources, intelligence, and the fact that the Interstate system was designed with military movements in mind.
And all of that is only defensive, I'm not gonna get into offense capabilities since this comment is already long enough, but like defensive, it's terrifying...
Needless to say, if you don't have literally the entire rest of the world on your side... Don't Mess With The United States Of America.
*”MUM SHUT UP IM TRYING TO WATCH WHITEACK”*
"What's Whiteack"
“oh umm its just a really educational science channel im watching to help with my revision”
Mom:Is it true?Let me check ur tablet 😊
*”oh shit”*
Mom*
“You ether die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.”
usa a hero? good joke
@@cenk.3467I think they meant how the USA used to be portrayed as a hero in ww1 and ww2 cause they saved western europe from being under Soviet control.
@cenk.3467 turkey is a country full of commies and traitors to God/Allah, so you have no right talking
@@williamdixon2446 There is no good or bad side in wars. Every country is right on their perspective.
@@cenk.3467 hermano porque entonces muestras tu perspectiva si va a estar alguien del lado contrario
If this happened I think Russia would gain Alaska, since they were the ones who invaded it back and probably those who did most of the work on the West Canadian front, they’d probably be putting MASSIVE pressure during negociations to get it back, especially using their historical claim to their advantage, just like they got Koenigsberg.
I agree.
no. it would realistically make no sense for russia to take it, since russian culture is practically extinct there. alaska is culturally much more similar to canada which is why they'd become part of canada. russia really gave up their claim after they sold it, so i'm not sure if they would want to take it, especially with the resistance they'd face. also, you're confused about koenigsberg/kaliningrad. the city was always german, and the reason the soviets got it was out of blatant imperialism really. overall i don't think the russians would have as much sway over the world (especially after it fully mobilized) to realize any claim they had on alaska, and that's even if they try for it
@@nolan3312 как русский говорю нет. Аляску мы вернём.
@user-dable_bust3107 He has a point in that linguistically and culturally it would be easier for us Canadians to govern. Russia knows the importance of that given what happened with the Warsaw Pact.
That said, I do think Russia could be rewarded here with resource and basing rights in Alaska. Would be in the interest of the arctic countries to work together.
@@nolan3312 Yes, koenigsberg was 100% German, as it was literally where modern Germany formed (Prussia), they had no real reason to get it, but still did because it was right at their border and they wanted to secure some German lands for themselves correctly, this is why I believe they’d still want Alaska. Also it doesn’t matter if Russian culture is gone there, they’ll just deport everyone to somewhere else and put Russians in their place, just like they did for Kaliningrad.
The American Nationalist State flag looks badass.
Lil usa got too excited😂
I think they played to much hoi 4
Although I find it highly unlikely that the naval invasions of Alaska and the Yucatan peninsula go successfully, otherwise this is pretty realistic. Also, I find it very unlikely that any advances are made during the nuclear winter. Good video, however!
also why aren't there any Latin American partisans?
@@mrsillytacos True that
@@heavymetal3264 Yeah especially in Mexico and the Darien Gap, it should realistically be a Vietnam situation
What baffled me the most was South American forces pushing right past Panama like it was nothing. Realistically you would have such a massive advantage simply holding that canal alone- it doesn't matter if it stands or is blown apart, I believe it would have been a remarkably difficult feat
Yall make some great points
The map layout is so good!!
Nice done, could you make the same scenario but this time in 1945? It would be interesting to see how long the US could conquer with less powerful countries (Except for the USSR)
It’s literally just going to be USA wins in 45 everywhere except here was already weakened duh
The wait was worth it
If Kanye west became president
Accurate
if drake became president
We would be in war against Poland if he did
If this were a movie, it'd be the saddest, biggest movie of all time.
One of the best scenarios I have ever watched
Great job at this!
I am impressed. This is one of the best videos on the channel. It turned out very epic.
I'm surprised that you still have so few subscribers.
I think it would be a good idea to make a video "NATO VS the world" soon. This war will be even more massive.
Perhaps in this case there will be countries on NATO’s side that could to join there🇺🇦🇬🇪🇧🇦🇮🇱
Amerika zaten İxrail'i seve seve yanına alır zaten 😑😒
Some Canadian Failed his maple syrup production class
you improve your videos very fast, keep it up bro!
Can you do a second American civil war
Thank you. That's a great idea.
Epic video!
Fictional but love it! What if you did NATO vs the world at some point?
Yeah that would be intresing
NATO would win.
The US+Europe is just too op.
@@noidea-cj8mn They would fight against Russia, China, the entirety of Asia, the entirety of Africa, all of Oceania, the entirety of Latin America and some european countries who haven't joined NATO, if they win it would be using nukes.
No, NATO obviously loses
That would be fire but i think that they will lost BC of they alr border a superpower and all of Ásia, África and south america
yo this guy improved so much i haven't watched u in a while
who agrees bro should make a winning version if America won :edit ty for one like C:
The only possible winning for america is a white peace where the ANS manages to take over the whole american continent and increasing the available manpower with the population living in poor occupied regions with fake promises of citizenship, prosperity and peace; also would be key destinating resources for development proyects and fighting the crime in order to earn the people's will. So the entire continent would be a huge and well-armed fortress with millions of defenders [Of course, this is the most optimistic scenario just have fun with this content!]
A one hundred ninety four nation army couldn't hold me back
It would be nice if you made a video where NATO is fighting against the whole world
Can't even take out russia in Ukraine for the past 2 years, I think the world got that in the bag.
They would definitely win.
@@smthsmthsmthsmth can't win in Ukraine doubt it
@@velcranoxofficials9970 ???
Man, I loved the video, congratulations on your effort. And by the way, now I'm your subscriber
My man forgot the existence of the Panama Canal, though maybe it got destroyed.
How would it be destroyed tho?
Day 3 of asking usa vs the oic!
I have this in my mind but I have different plans right now.
@@Whiteack_Mapper Ty
Cool!
Btw for the next video, can you make World In Conflict scenario
I enjoyed the video so you have a new sub
Hey, nice video
Can you do usa & ussr vs n@zi germany?
nutzee germany
@@Tester69Mapping*NAZI
They have the rise of nations war declaration sound!
5:39 USA at its greatest territorial extent
It’s also hilarious that there would be troops left over to continue the fight against the U.S. after a nuclear first strike. 1) The US has enough nuclear weapons to end the world several times over. 2) If the US really did strike first, it would have struck all enemy nuclear stockpiles first, highly limiting any nuclear response. Also, a nuclear retaliation would be highly limited due to the lack of maintenance Russian and Chinese nuclear weapons receive. If given a first strike, the US would have a huge advantage in a nuclear war. The only countries that could legitimately respond with nuclear weapons in this case are Britain and France, and their stockpiles are very limited, allowing US air defenses more of an opportunity to shoot them down.
Why are you angry? This video is for entertainment purposes only.
The nuclear weapons in the US arsenal wouldn't be anywhere near enough to end the world, nor would the combined nuclear arsenals of all the world's nations. There'd probably be a climate disaster, famine, tons of major cities would be destroyed and the devastation would be immeasurable but every powerful nation, including the US, has taken massive steps to ensure they're still militarily capable after a nuclear attack. If the US fired all its warheads at Russia even in the peak Cold War when they had many times more nuclear weapons than they do today, it'd still be capable enough to attack the US albeit weakened a lot, however the US would suffer the same issue when the warheads hit American soil.
In this scenario it's not just Russia but the entire world and all their cities and warheads, plus the US arsenal is much more limited in comparison to 50 years ago. The US can't wipe out enough military personnel and installations to prevent an invasion if their targets are literally every military in the entire world outside North America. Also the other nations have their own highly advanced air defences and early detection systems (though the US is probably the most ready for a potential nuclear strike) so I doubt a retaliatory response would be limited much, if at all.
If this happened, the consequences would have been so horrendous.
Whiteack I have a question: If USA started the war then how is the economy going to work
china and rest of the world
Finally, I found a video that I wanted to watch
i tink the peace deal should be more in favor of the world.
you missed something very important you missed the u.s bases
edit: also how the hell does the world shit out 300+ aircaft carriers when china the closest to being2nd is struggling to make them
@@rln2016 now I can see some bases being abandoned but a few no I couldn't for example a base near the red sea can close down the suez cannel
@@ThatMK8Guy Chances are is that during the invasion of Mexico, many countries probably got worried and forced the Americans out early.
It seems someone didn’t get into art school again
What happen usa overseas territory in pacific is they are still us territory or independet and also is russia gain from alaska island like aleutian islands
Edit: good video ❤
@@lyudmilaismayilova8937 it would make more sense for Canada to take it, hardly any ethnic Russians left.
Thought this would be an instant victory for the world
it would
there would be way more than 34mil active troops by the world
People underestimate America's military.
Even if the U.S went up against the world it would still take a long time for the U.S to fall mostly because it has the largest military and some of the most advanced weapons of warfare.
@@randomdinotsar8385
Don’t forget they are mostly isolated away from the main continents
@@europegaming6384 Most of which are not in north/south america.
It'd take months for them to break the US navy enough to begin putting Men in the Americas
This is just the plot of Fallout without the nuclear explosions.
Idea: China 🆚 Japan ?
@@BloodPunch465 china might have a big army, but quality wise it goes to Japan, likely a bloody stalemate.
This actually hilarious, also wtf is a Corvette....
Hi. Corvettes are classified as warships. They are medium-sized and lightly armored warships. They are usually smaller than frigates. They are fast and highly maneuverable ships. Their missions include coastal security, patrol, maritime surveillance, and defense against naval targets. They are characterized by light armor, powerful weapon systems, and generally low costs. They provide additional firepower to destroyers and frigates during combat. Corvettes are generally capable of detecting and operating in tasks related to submarines.
corvettes are cheaper 😎😎😎😎
Bro your video go to viral in the youtube 🎉🎉🎉🎉
I have a suggestion. Instead of a country vs country, how about a state vs state or province?
New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, and Utah vs Texas?
Please do Mozambique vs Eswatini and Malawi
Can't wait for the sequel
I wonder who the leader was that won?🤔
Idk but am awful one.
Obama
Kamala Harris.
@@subliminal6529 I think it was her😅💀💀💀💀☠️
Why it didn't got fragmented or balkanized?
Adam Harris was an Canadian Painter
Can you do a zombie apocalypse scenario? would be cool! do it for europe
A lot of American in the comment to say how they would "win", like wtf guys, it's the all world, and i read a lot of comment, a lot of point are forgotten that invalidate them ❤
neither side would win
@@yeetneet5334 😂
Mexico, the carribean and Central America would fall quickly, also the Panama canal being cut off combined with america no longer participating in the world economy would basically force many nations to end the war
@@KVUAA what? They wouldn't, it would be a brutal stalemate after Canada and Mexico
@@yeetneet5334 Yes it would, but remember ww1? Those who tired first lose and in this case it's the US
what happens if the world was divided by the prime meridian and declared war with eachother?
Man I was actually suprised while watching that nuclear weapond weren't used, that perhaps the world wouldn't end. And then 6:50 happened and all hope was lost. Now billions will die.
6:25 How do you bomb with stealth aircraft?
by flying them
Wdym like the Japanese style
@@kortexdagamer I meant to say, stealth aircraft are difficult to detect by radars, so they carried out the bombing.
since usa has the most planes and ships they couldve stopped an invasion since they were isolated. this is unrealistic
Not against the rest of the world including each and every one of their NATO allies, combined. Your username sounds Lithuanian, you must imagine a situation where you would rather fight with Russia than the US. That would be the unrealistic part. Beating the US after that though, with literally the whole world against them, would be easy.
The USA might be quite a strong country but you do know that every other country is not fully mobilized, like even Russia isn't fully mobilized.
If China were to fully mobilize in about 10 years, they'd be 2x stronger than a fully mobilized America. This is due to the sheer workforce and land for factories that China has compared to America.
Not against the combined forces of all of Europe + other countries
@@YisraelamundasAmerica is also not mobilized, and is still top dawg
@@paloim yeah and barely mobilised China has nearly taken over America in every factor
What happens if Donald Trump becomes president
Jesse, what the hell are you talking about.
Realistically Mexico would just end up as another Afghanistan situation
I love this video but i have an harder war scenario for you which is Iran vs United Kingdom but without allies
Iran invader and United Kingdom defender
I didnt know uncle sam liked painting
i think that south america wouldnt even able to launch a counter attack the only people capable of fighting back would be russia and china who would probably be washed, cool animation though
But South America was not alone. It received substantial military aid before the counter-attack.
That’s delusional
Why is this not a Game App 😢😭?
Ah, seems like TH-cam understands my paranoia towards the recent Supreme Court decision.
are you canadian?
Realistically Usa would be cooked in this situation BUT USA would win canada and mexico and SURVIVED because the atlantic ocean is crazy huge
When artillery end💀, when not end😈
I’d love to know what other nations “stealth aircraft” are. At the vary best, they could match what the U.S. had 40 years ago. Nothing compared to what they have now.
Longest 8 minute video ever 💔
What website are you using?
Do you use 5 or 4 FPS?
Homelander after The Boys S4 Finale
there is just 2 main inconsistencies, canada army would not fall that quick by any means, and us cant invade mexico like it did from the west, that zone of mexico its a gogistical nightmare all mountens and verry deep zones taht would not allow the us to take that route, it can invade the coast with ships and take veracruz to attempt to take a shortcut threw puebla to mexico city but that other route its imposible, also they could not sustain 2 fronts that large like that, and its not because they dont have the tech but rather because the rea its extremely large and the army personel would not be sufficient
Ragnarök 1937 but Democracy Version
Mexico at the end: 😁
Canada at the end: 🤨
Bold of you to think we Mexicans would surrender THAT easily
mexico has alot of mountains and a high population soooo
Well to be fair the government surrendered but not the people, especially the Mexican cartels
Your cartels will not😂😂
Maybe when you get raided with b-16 stealthbombers and all your infastructure is ashes
@@tylerredforge5563the cartels always lived underground anyways. Destroyed infrastructure doesn’t make a big difference
what’s this simulation called?
What I would really think would happen is that an attrition war would break out. The USA wouldn't have the resources to maintain the occupation of Mexico and Canada both at once. The world directly invading the USA wouldn't also go that well, and it would be a very risky move.
the world on top ! 💪🏻🌍
USA IS SUPERIOR
@@olg7483no
very good effort and video, its just that the armies move way too unrealistically past 7:08 nothing makes sense like did russian soldiers just gain superspeed and blitz through all of the frozen tundra of nunavut and why did the american army disappear every once in a while in the southern front you cant get pushed back THAT far then stabilize the line again hundreds of times.... and i dont think i need to explain why encircling the entire united states in a smooth box is unrealistic. again great effort but u should look at mapping videos of real scenarios for practice
But this is the world vs the USA. So it's not Russia vs the USA. Russia did not invade Alaska alone. And what do you mean by disappear?
@@Whiteack_Mapper i didnt mean it was just russian soldiers its just since there was a naval invasion of alaska and i assumed it began in russia but thats besides my point, and when i said the american army disappeared i mean the world army advanced really far into mexico all of a sudden and then stopped, and it seemed like all american forces just stopped fighting since you cant get pushed back that far then stabilize again
@@k5skyer No, no one stopped fighting and according to this scenario, the US was able to fight for years thanks to its superior technology.
@@Whiteack_Mapper im not talking about the scenario im saying that the armies move unrealistically
@@k5skyer Oh, this video is for entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be realistic.
Do you have a discord server?
I dont have.
How the usa actually conquered countries despite the giant war against everyone (my theories)
The Armies of the world needed to get to Canada, and travel takes time. So the USA could go through Canada with minimal resistance. Canada didn't want people to die. So they surrendered, decreasing the time needed for the invasion.
Mexico was weakened by bombings.
The usa had a more powerful army in this simulation than in real life, and the world had less countries fighting for it, while the USA had more land, so it could invade the carribean. Central America had been destroyed by attack helicopters.
Greenland is useless, so it was instantly given up.
Let me remind you that the USA is a superpower. Of course, the USA could invade so many countries as in the video. But when all the countries in the world are in alliance, the USA would lose.
+The world was not ready for war. They are getting ready after the USA started attacking the North American countries.
Why is this actually realistic. But I think that the US would be able to go out even more.
why didn't usa get its former borders....
As an American, I think America would've annexed the world, rahhh
I LOVE THE BF4 THEME❤
its not battlefield the runner at all. its by a beautiful muslim woman who sang it.
@@SethACook That music was also in BF1
@@Whiteack_Mapper yes I know that’s what we both said
THE ANS WILL RUN SUPREME! SECOND TIMES THE CHARM!
where did the United States get 104,000 tanks in the year 29 ? what about industry and the economic crisis
They just produced it, my dear.
@@Whiteack_Mapper ok
Come on the USA is strong but not that strong to take the bloody world!
usa is strong and hard to invade because once you invade all of the population will fight to last man which means over 300 million people with guns
imagine invading a country with 300 million "soldiers" who have guns
The American air force and naval force can hold its own against the world
Yeah they wouldn’t be able to invade mainland America
Most Americans would be fighting against the government.
@@Yisraelamundas nope if usa was ever in war and "invaded" most americans would side with the current government and fight for their own rights then be oppressed by puppet government by foreign power
@@LazzieMazzienot a regime trying to take over the world, also Americans are all about freedom.
Finally; the U.S. is easily the numerator in terms of their population to the whole world.
Do you think America is invincible or something? At least hundreds of millions military aged men would be invading maybe even a billion active if there was a forced conscription. You’re navy and air force would eventually cripple after being shot down and destroyed and we probably lose millions but in reality there’s hundreds of millions of men ready to storm America both west and east. America would have no chance against the world
I feel like that the war would end in a huge stalemate. Canada falls immediately and Mexico soon after. North America is held strong, and some pacific islands are taken too. Where the real battle is going to happen is the naval and military bases. I’d imagine America would use its vast military in the Middle East to seize as many oil reserves as they can and starve the world out, forcing peace.
Honestly with smart leadership America could win. Not easily but it wouldn’t be as challenging as one would think
😂
@@KVUAA He aint wrong. Renember when that funny austrian painer nearly managed it?
@@tietieno4890he wasnt agaisnt the entire world military
@@Magnanim0uz Nearly the world military. Like most of it
That’s delusional
All of this could have been avoided if they sent afghan army to fight haha
Along with Vietnamese soldiers.
The United States obliterated both afghan and Vietnamese armies 💀
Afghna didn't win because their army was strong, but because usa's army and commanders weren't prepared for Afghanistan territory. The same with Vietnam
@@Mark-nx5pk Just to lose anyway.
(Ik it was because of terrain,but still).
@@Mark-nx5pk wtf you up to bro? 💀
App?
I use Paint.