Sir, compose a piece with: A brass section A Strings sectiom (Violinonum sum) A wind section I am trying to do this my self, but can't quite get the sound I want, so I guess my tendancy to steal is not very akward, snyways... Doth ye dare to accept mine challeng?: X: No O: Yes Have a nice day, good sir.
@@CipherSphereqxc0698 I will accept it, but I will take me a long time, I have made numerous brass compositions and have messed with other ensembles before, I see what I can do!
It sounds like 14/16, only some of the last section sounds like 7/8 to me. The way I go about the subdivisions is where the groove lands most of the time, for example, 14/16 subdivided as 4+4+3+3 is something a lot of people would call 7/8, but the groove steps out of the eighth note pulse, so I wouldn’t call it that.
14/16 is addictive once you get used to it. I love 14/16. And this sounds awesome! Both the rythm and harmony are well written, pleasing and original. Bravo!
Interesting! I’ll definitely give you some pointers from a composer and listener’s perspective. 1. I love your harmonic structure! 2. I think it was already addressed about the muddy bass! 3. I love the arpeggiation on top, and would emphasize little details in the melody on the bass and spacing it with the alto range and bass range. Giving you a wider sound. 4. 3+3+3+2 Idea was very intriguing! Really nailed the odd meter! 5. 14:52 Your orchestration on the chords was quite interesting as well! The sudden feeling of a timpani smack, giving you that massive build! I adore the crescendo! 6. 15:24 Instead of the immediate fortissimo, personally I would change it towards a forte crescendoing towards the fortissimo for the grand effect. Then change to a piano for the chord on 15:29 leaving you with the large crescendo towards the forte!! 7. This piece absolutely intriguing with intensity! I love it!! Keep up the good work and for my final recommendation, build up the intensity to explode with more ferocity! W piece! Challenge completed. Now do 11/16
3+3+3+2 could *make* 11/16! The first example of 11 I can usually think of is the intro to the Book of Boba Fett theme, which Musicnotes actually marks as 3+3+5 instead!
Why do you only have 78 (now 79) subs you are SO underrated!! 7/4 (or any derivatives like 7/8 or 14/16) is my second favorite time signature (after 3/4) and seeing someone do this perfectly is AMAZING!! You actually need more subs bro 😭 You received a sub from me tho!
Very cool piece with nice harmony (I especially like the end of the first page)! 14/16 works because it does not usually feel like 2 bars of 7/16, and feels like 16/16 but with 2 beats missing at the end. This is why the song (for the most part) actually feels like 14/16 instead of 7/8.
Agreed. I don't know what the song is trying to evoke though. The lower arps become a melded morphing mess which had a really interesting sound actually. I'm guessing that's why it "didn't work" thouogh because it turned those lower arp lines into textured mud with indistinct harmony (Interesting mud that's in key, but still pretty muddy.) That's kinda what I liked the most. A middle ground could be to make use of both-a solution if one liked the synth sound but didn't want to lose the clear-sounding low arp entirely to the muddy synth texture could be to gradually lower note length (or decay/release on the patch if synth params are automate-able in MuseScore, I have no idea)-basically dynamic shift from what sounded legato towards staccato. Or leave it as it was and double the instrument at another octave and make that one fully staccato the whole time to bring the outline of the arp back into clarity. Or the muddy low arp with the too-long decay tails could be occassional accents underneath that come in sometimes, on time or before or after time to like a call/response. etc etc. I have mostly only made electronic music so I hear that and just think, whoa that sound like something I can use somewhere, at least. Happy accidents are the best.
i recently made a track that uses 7/8 and even 11/8 at times, and my trick is honestly just only use it if it actually flows well instead of trying to force it into a song. a good example of this is the beach theme for the snes game plok :p
Wow, I'm very impressed!! Odd time signatures are very unique, and they add a whole bunch of character to a piece of music. I love experimenting with odd time signatures, and even learning to conduct them. Fantastic job!! :)
I've been messing around with odd time signatures, and it's been some of the most fun I've had in a while. My favourite has got to be 17/16, it feels surprisingly natural, give it a shot! Editing to say this piece you've made is really, really good! I like it a lot.
@@Anklejbiter yeah, I like to be courage people to mess with unnatural time signatures, I did make on in 17/16 a bit ago with a 4+4+4+1 rhythm, I do plan to make another one though
@@drewracer777 I did 17 with 4+3+3+3+4, taking inspiration from hell on earth which uses 4+4+3+3+3+3 for 20/16 or some variant of 5/4. IMO It's hard to make music, honestly. I am proud of my recent stuff, but even that is at this point of... like I'm not really sure it's good enough to share, you know? but who knows. They say you're your own worst critic. You're really good at this, though. Keep it up!
If I were just hearing this without context I think I'd definitely count it as 7/8 because I cannot count to 14 at 200 BPM but I have mad respect for you having put this together and I didn't come on here to argue against its 14/16--that is also totally valid imo. I just can't count that fast 😂
I genuinely forgot to comment on this when it first released. This was a really nice piece to listen to and interesting to see how you work. Can't wait to see more of your interesting compositions! It looks playable to me, though the left hand would probably require a bit of practice for me lol.
I've tried to write something in 13/8, and it actually turned out to be pretty good. I think it's good to experiment with weird time signatures every once in a while
They sound scary to composers who haven't tried them but they're really not. I see 13/8 and think "cool, 12/8 with an extra 1/8th note... 12/8 already sounds like 4 groups of 3 due to where the accents land, so 13/8 just means 3 groups of 3 + 1 group of 4. Could be the last, the first bar or it could be (3+3+2+3+2)/8 or any other accent pattern you like, the point is none of them are scary once you start to hear where you want the strongest accent beats to land, and repeat it a few times, most people won't even notice it's "odd" then. A good example I liked was the repeated single note rhythm that started every Battlestar Galactica episode (particularly during the "previously" recap). Tell most people that was based on a 7-over-2 polyrhythm pattern and they would be like "huh? is it weird somehow? it sounds normal enough to me"
Also anyone can get their feet wet with pickup measures or extra short measures at the end of phrases. Write the thing in 12/8 but sometimes add a tiny transitional bar of 1/8. Stuff like that. Probably easier to write, sounds the same, and unless your whole song is consistently 13/8, possibly even easier to sight-read, too. Just make sure the downbeats suggested by the bars and time sigs actually match what you hear in your head, because maybe you actually need 9/8 and then 4/8 instead of 12/8 and 1/8. These make good self-challenges though always
im so jealous of people that can make good music, im doing my a levels soon and im considering doing music for a-levels because its so fun and i love too much but i never took it seriously in GCSE and my compostions were so mid
That's so cool! As a 7/8, or in this case 14/16, addict, I've also made something similar to this, but as it was made in musescore 3 2 years ago, it doesn't compare to this imo. It's the only video on my channel if you want to check it out
I have a suggestion for the bass section personal opinion btw! I recommend the bass not be as muddy and instead for the arpeggiation in the bass in the beginning be spanned out in octaves! But overall incredible job with the piece very intensifying!!
I respect the endevour, I have embarked myself on something similar, trying to make my own version of "Veni Veni Emmanual"...with no music theory under my belt, and no one to help...lol I want band, chior and piano parts...along with a solo section that I have to write myself as I can't find it anywhere. I have some done, 1 years worth of me trying and failing and learning...I should record my progress. Cool video as well, 14/16 isn't something I've seen b4...👍
The 3+3+3+3+2 division is followed by only one voice most of the time while the other is just playing plain 7/8, also the second page is just 7/8 in a 2+2+2+1 division, which is completely different from 3+3+3+3+2
Man this video is so great. I know you probably don't want to use your voice but i think it would be so much funnier if you were talking these subtitles, just my opinion. (not even necessarily reading these subtitles but you know these videos where the person talks and keep cutting and going through the video, yea I don't know what I'm saying haha) Keep the great content!
@@maxwalsh9950 This is gonna sound really stupid but bear with me, I upload these scores to musescore’s website, and it has a feature to visualize it on the site, so I record the site playing it on the piano and cropped out the rest of the site 🤣I am looking for a proper program for this
I seem to end up with a few measures of weird times scattered through songs fairly often. I don't think I've uploaded any of them yet (I should), but it happens pretty frequently. My favorite examples that I've ended up with (just in terms of weirdness) are one song that is in 4/4 but just has one bar of 17/16 about a third of the way through it, and one that is also in 4/4, but the actual pattern is 4/4, 4/4, 4/4, 13/16, 4/4, 4/4, 4/4, 17/16, which loops once before continuing, There's other examples as well (one of the songs I have actually uploaded uses a weird pattern of 6/8 and 3/8, and one song that I haven't is in 7/8 but with a 2-3-2 division, and more), but I think those are the most fun. Edit: Unrelated, but i just noticed that both of our profile pictures are based on creepers :) Mine is a screenshot of a creeper face that was printed from a block printer I designed with a full adder overlaid on it :)
@@BryanLu0 yeah, I don’t care about genuine remixing, I just put that there to try to deter people from trying to steal my stuff, big license seems scary ya know?
@@mattattackwhackyt9930 I use Musescore 4 to write the music, I do not use the stock sounds but use the plugins muse sounds, and I edit these videos with Microsoft clip champ, all of these softwares are actually free I believe
Honestly surprised you have the storage to keep all these files and turn them into a whole video. My computer cannot handle that. Also, I loved the idea of Musescore 4 but it does not work for me. Can't believe the synth nearly recreated the Dorico Beep phenomenon! 😂 Ironic given that the man who made a video on Dorico's flaws was also named the head designer for Musescore 4 (and the latest Audacity).
I am aware of the case for 7/8, and I can for sure see if you think this is in 7/8, but I intended it to be in 14/16 :)
Sir, compose a piece with:
A brass section
A Strings sectiom (Violinonum sum)
A wind section
I am trying to do this my self, but can't quite get the sound I want, so I guess my tendancy to steal is not very akward, snyways...
Doth ye dare to accept mine challeng?:
X: No O: Yes
Have a nice day, good sir.
@@CipherSphereqxc0698 I will accept it, but I will take me a long time, I have made numerous brass compositions and have messed with other ensembles before, I see what I can do!
It sounds like 14/16, only some of the last section sounds like 7/8 to me.
The way I go about the subdivisions is where the groove lands most of the time, for example, 14/16 subdivided as 4+4+3+3 is something a lot of people would call 7/8, but the groove steps out of the eighth note pulse, so I wouldn’t call it that.
@@Isalick34 yeah that is 100% fair, I tried, the section near the end does not go in to 16th notes at all
write one with 22/7 time
14/16 is addictive once you get used to it. I love 14/16. And this sounds awesome! Both the rythm and harmony are well written, pleasing and original. Bravo!
Interesting! I’ll definitely give you some pointers from a composer and listener’s perspective.
1. I love your harmonic structure!
2. I think it was already addressed about the muddy bass!
3. I love the arpeggiation on top, and would emphasize little details in the melody on the bass and spacing it with the alto range and bass range. Giving you a wider sound.
4. 3+3+3+2 Idea was very intriguing! Really nailed the odd meter!
5. 14:52 Your orchestration on the chords was quite interesting as well! The sudden feeling of a timpani smack, giving you that massive build! I adore the crescendo!
6. 15:24 Instead of the immediate fortissimo, personally I would change it towards a forte crescendoing towards the fortissimo for the grand effect.
Then change to a piano for the chord on 15:29 leaving you with the large crescendo towards the forte!!
7. This piece absolutely intriguing with intensity! I love it!!
Keep up the good work and for my final recommendation, build up the intensity to explode with more ferocity!
W piece! Challenge completed. Now do 11/16
3+3+3+3+2 (you forgot a 3)
@@garrylarry890 Here it is: 3 lmaooo
3+3+3+2 could *make* 11/16! The first example of 11 I can usually think of is the intro to the Book of Boba Fett theme, which Musicnotes actually marks as 3+3+5 instead!
I love how to take on the challenge to actually challenge yourself! You have/are developing such talent. Supa nice results! Keep this up 👏
Why do you only have 78 (now 79) subs you are SO underrated!!
7/4 (or any derivatives like 7/8 or 14/16) is my second favorite time signature (after 3/4) and seeing someone do this perfectly is AMAZING!! You actually need more subs bro 😭 You received a sub from me tho!
bro forgot that 6/8 exists (the underrated goat)
@@UpdateFreak33 true (i would rank it the same as 3/4)
7/4 is so fun, as is other normal time signatures, but every so often missing a beat it is so fun to work with, or using 7/4 as 3 3 1
@@Wreniffer indeed my favorite 7/4 rhythm is 4 + 3
consider yourself an opp of you dont like 13/8, π/4,
Sounds like an old Zelda boss battle… I can just imagine a 16 bit version
This honestly turned out so well, especially the second half!
Very cool piece with nice harmony (I especially like the end of the first page)!
14/16 works because it does not usually feel like 2 bars of 7/16, and feels like 16/16 but with 2 beats missing at the end. This is why the song (for the most part) actually feels like 14/16 instead of 7/8.
3:20 what? It sounded really great with square waves, much better than piano!
that's what I was thinking as well lmao
sounded like toby fox
Agreed. I don't know what the song is trying to evoke though. The lower arps become a melded morphing mess which had a really interesting sound actually. I'm guessing that's why it "didn't work" thouogh because it turned those lower arp lines into textured mud with indistinct harmony (Interesting mud that's in key, but still pretty muddy.) That's kinda what I liked the most. A middle ground could be to make use of both-a solution if one liked the synth sound but didn't want to lose the clear-sounding low arp entirely to the muddy synth texture could be to gradually lower note length (or decay/release on the patch if synth params are automate-able in MuseScore, I have no idea)-basically dynamic shift from what sounded legato towards staccato. Or leave it as it was and double the instrument at another octave and make that one fully staccato the whole time to bring the outline of the arp back into clarity.
Or the muddy low arp with the too-long decay tails could be occassional accents underneath that come in sometimes, on time or before or after time to like a call/response. etc etc. I have mostly only made electronic music so I hear that and just think, whoa that sound like something I can use somewhere, at least. Happy accidents are the best.
how dare you
I appreciate your creativity. Very fun to watch your process!
@@ephraimcullen I love making videos like this, but I often am too lazy to edit or I forgot to record the process in general, thank you tho!
This is super cool and creative, you deserve more subscribers.
i recently made a track that uses 7/8 and even 11/8 at times, and my trick is honestly just only use it if it actually flows well instead of trying to force it into a song. a good example of this is the beach theme for the snes game plok :p
Wow, I'm very impressed!! Odd time signatures are very unique, and they add a whole bunch of character to a piece of music. I love experimenting with odd time signatures, and even learning to conduct them. Fantastic job!! :)
I've been messing around with odd time signatures, and it's been some of the most fun I've had in a while. My favourite has got to be 17/16, it feels surprisingly natural, give it a shot!
Editing to say this piece you've made is really, really good! I like it a lot.
@@Anklejbiter yeah, I like to be courage people to mess with unnatural time signatures, I did make on in 17/16 a bit ago with a 4+4+4+1 rhythm, I do plan to make another one though
@@drewracer777 I did 17 with 4+3+3+3+4, taking inspiration from hell on earth which uses 4+4+3+3+3+3 for 20/16 or some variant of 5/4.
IMO It's hard to make music, honestly. I am proud of my recent stuff, but even that is at this point of... like I'm not really sure it's good enough to share, you know? but who knows. They say you're your own worst critic. You're really good at this, though. Keep it up!
Oh my goodness. This actually sounds amazing!! It’s really fun to listen to- I might try playing it sometime!
I’m actually surprised you don’t have more subs, so I’m going to sub. You’re legitimately talented at composing music.
Hol up bro grew by 240 subs in 3 weeks
Sounds great! Your channel is very underrated.
I will say working zoomed out in page view is a wild workflow lol. Good video tho!
great music and great editing! really deserves more attention!
If I were just hearing this without context I think I'd definitely count it as 7/8 because I cannot count to 14 at 200 BPM but I have mad respect for you having put this together and I didn't come on here to argue against its 14/16--that is also totally valid imo. I just can't count that fast 😂
I genuinely forgot to comment on this when it first released. This was a really nice piece to listen to and interesting to see how you work. Can't wait to see more of your interesting compositions!
It looks playable to me, though the left hand would probably require a bit of practice for me lol.
It sounds really good
cool piece, be careful with those alterations you're making not required chromatic passages through the use of enharmonic equivalence.
This was really cool, i liked the synth lol :(
Nice work dude!
@@_thoride_2913 thank you man!
WOAH THATS SO GOOD
i really like this!
What a fun piece to listen to!
I've tried to write something in 13/8, and it actually turned out to be pretty good. I think it's good to experiment with weird time signatures every once in a while
They sound scary to composers who haven't tried them but they're really not. I see 13/8 and think "cool, 12/8 with an extra 1/8th note... 12/8 already sounds like 4 groups of 3 due to where the accents land, so 13/8 just means 3 groups of 3 + 1 group of 4. Could be the last, the first bar or it could be (3+3+2+3+2)/8 or any other accent pattern you like, the point is none of them are scary once you start to hear where you want the strongest accent beats to land, and repeat it a few times, most people won't even notice it's "odd" then.
A good example I liked was the repeated single note rhythm that started every Battlestar Galactica episode (particularly during the "previously" recap). Tell most people that was based on a 7-over-2 polyrhythm pattern and they would be like "huh? is it weird somehow? it sounds normal enough to me"
Also anyone can get their feet wet with pickup measures or extra short measures at the end of phrases. Write the thing in 12/8 but sometimes add a tiny transitional bar of 1/8. Stuff like that. Probably easier to write, sounds the same, and unless your whole song is consistently 13/8, possibly even easier to sight-read, too. Just make sure the downbeats suggested by the bars and time sigs actually match what you hear in your head, because maybe you actually need 9/8 and then 4/8 instead of 12/8 and 1/8. These make good self-challenges though always
@@silphv yeah, the pattern i picked for my thing was (3+3+3+4) I routinely use 12/8 for its triplet pattern
im so jealous of people that can make good music, im doing my a levels soon and im considering doing music for a-levels because its so fun and i love too much but i never took it seriously in GCSE and my compostions were so mid
@@TertiaryQuota don’t say that! Your compositions will improve as time goes on and you learn new thing to add to your palette!
Id watch a tv show about a man amnesia finding out he has the power to see someones darkest thoughts so he becomes a cop, with this theme
bless the youtube algorithm deities for recommending this to so many people including myself
i thought the song was going to be 15 minutes long :(
@@arcioko2142 yeah, I don’t compose long pieces, don’t know why, I am trying to get better about making longer works
That's so cool! As a 7/8, or in this case 14/16, addict, I've also made something similar to this, but as it was made in musescore 3 2 years ago, it doesn't compare to this imo. It's the only video on my channel if you want to check it out
this just shows that *not all songs in weird time signatures have to sound like a maths equation*
Nice job buddy
I like to compose in 7/8 and 5/4 😺
I have a suggestion for the bass section personal opinion btw!
I recommend the bass not be as muddy and instead for the arpeggiation in the bass in the beginning be spanned out in octaves!
But overall incredible job with the piece very intensifying!!
This song actuallt hits kinda hard.
I respect the endevour, I have embarked myself on something similar, trying to make my own version of "Veni Veni Emmanual"...with no music theory under my belt, and no one to help...lol
I want band, chior and piano parts...along with a solo section that I have to write myself as I can't find it anywhere. I have some done, 1 years worth of me trying and failing and learning...I should record my progress. Cool video as well, 14/16 isn't something I've seen b4...👍
@@rlandlegofan98 good luck man! If you need help, I can help!
@@drewracer777 I might need help eventually...lol
What software do you use, Finale, MuseScore?
@@rlandlegofan98 Musescore 4
@@drewracer777 That's what I use, cool. It'll be easier to show u what I have done then.
This kind of reminds me of the openning theme of the HBO series Westworld
Normie musician: OMG I wrote a song in 14/16 this is so hard
Meanwhile Meshuggah:
This is sick
bro really wanted to resurrect Math rock 💀
The 3+3+3+3+2 division is followed by only one voice most of the time while the other is just playing plain 7/8, also the second page is just 7/8 in a 2+2+2+1 division, which is completely different from 3+3+3+3+2
I actually love 14/16 so much
Not complicated enough. Take polo rythm with 13/17 and 31/7
I love it! ❤
Man this video is so great. I know you probably don't want to use your voice but i think it would be so much funnier if you were talking these subtitles, just my opinion. (not even necessarily reading these subtitles but you know these videos where the person talks and keep cutting and going through the video, yea I don't know what I'm saying haha) Keep the great content!
@@brunofreire4874 yeah someday I might, I do not currently own a functional microphone, and my voice is really funky, but thank you!
I remember writing my Digital Composition final in 23/8. I'm surprised my teacher even let me pass.
whats the software being used in the video? if you know by any chance 🙏🏾
@@kdearsarakdearsara9377 No clue.
the chiptune sounding one sounded great??
Subscribed!
Hey cool piece!! :)
Just wondering, what is the software that you use for the piano green/blue note visualisation? (At 13:40)
@@maxwalsh9950 This is gonna sound really stupid but bear with me, I upload these scores to musescore’s website, and it has a feature to visualize it on the site, so I record the site playing it on the piano and cropped out the rest of the site 🤣I am looking for a proper program for this
@@drewracer777 Ohh woah ok cool, I didnt expect that loll :) Good to know though
I seem to end up with a few measures of weird times scattered through songs fairly often. I don't think I've uploaded any of them yet (I should), but it happens pretty frequently. My favorite examples that I've ended up with (just in terms of weirdness) are one song that is in 4/4 but just has one bar of 17/16 about a third of the way through it, and one that is also in 4/4, but the actual pattern is 4/4, 4/4, 4/4, 13/16, 4/4, 4/4, 4/4, 17/16, which loops once before continuing, There's other examples as well (one of the songs I have actually uploaded uses a weird pattern of 6/8 and 3/8, and one song that I haven't is in 7/8 but with a 2-3-2 division, and more), but I think those are the most fun.
Edit: Unrelated, but i just noticed that both of our profile pictures are based on creepers :) Mine is a screenshot of a creeper face that was printed from a block printer I designed with a full adder overlaid on it :)
well done
hey that's pretty good yeah
2:20 hollow knight soul sanctum vibes
Watched this whole video thinking this guy had at least a minion subs, bravo
A "minion" suvs
@@lailoutherand A "minion" "suvs"
"A" "minion" "suvs"
@@skeire1 " "A" "minion" "suvs" "
Minions watch youtube confirmed
Some parts at 3:00 didn't sound half bad, really depends on the kind of vibe you're going for
Yeah, I make all kinds of synth pieces, I just didn’t like how it sounded here, but I definitely have synth works in the making
WHOA 3:00 SOUNDS INCREDIBLE WHAT DO YOU MEAN IT SOUNDS BAD????
Bro, did you accidentally make Undertale Battle music??? Shit goes crazy but it's definitely giving RPG
What was that background music at 8:52 cuz I just started shaking my ass and I couldn't stop
That was my song Swingin’ Away, it is on my Channel and on my audio if you want to download it.
@@TSCB13 th-cam.com/video/HIrSxbBGGRg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Lkfuz33WaYV-D4dp
tower defense boss day
I WANNA REMIX THIS ❤❤
@@midnightsmusicalmuseum go for it! If you want a midi file I can give you it!
YOU HAVE A YT CHANNEL??
@@drewracer777 I might try doin' this by ear (and the aid of the audio file LOL)
@@RED40HOURSIndeed!!!
13:38 Finished Result
This is fantastic and I love it, goin'
two subscribe .
(I have a thing in 23.5/20 just sayng)
Dope
personally, i would have switched up the arpeggios more to add rhythm, but it was still good nonetheless.
You should try writing something in 25/16
bro change the Gb in F#, so the piece is harmonically correct. I love your piece anyway, especially the melody. great job.
Ousak 🎹🎼
based g harmonic minor enjoyer
Touchou music be like:
wow. what im about to say is cliche but this sounds like awesome boss music
cool now do e/pi time signature
@@arkdoesstuff7362 musescore crashed…. My computer is overheating…
Bro i thought that synth was so cool 😭
But i get musescore isnt exactly capable of dine tuning that sort of thing
@@carnanya yeah I liked the synth but I felt it did not go for what I wanted, I do have other video game synth projects in the works tho!
I don't if ur gonna see this but what app/ program u using to make these songs? idk if youve put a link or not im prolly blind
Musescore 4
@@drewracer777 ty
I'm curious, can you actually use cc by nd 4.0? No derivation seems impossible to enforce
@@BryanLu0 yeah, I don’t care about genuine remixing, I just put that there to try to deter people from trying to steal my stuff, big license seems scary ya know?
What app are you using to make this?
@@mattattackwhackyt9930 I use Musescore 4 to write the music, I do not use the stock sounds but use the plugins muse sounds, and I edit these videos with Microsoft clip champ, all of these softwares are actually free I believe
Thank you!
what app did u use to compose that my good sir? :D
@@wubou8758 Musescore 4, it is a free software
@@drewracer777 oh yea mb x) thx for reminding me :D
Honestly surprised you have the storage to keep all these files and turn them into a whole video. My computer cannot handle that. Also, I loved the idea of Musescore 4 but it does not work for me. Can't believe the synth nearly recreated the Dorico Beep phenomenon! 😂 Ironic given that the man who made a video on Dorico's flaws was also named the head designer for Musescore 4 (and the latest Audacity).
@@LoraCoggins yeah these videos take up sooo much storage, I have to delete the raw footage when I am done
What software are you using?
@@antoniowoods9583 Musescore 4
hey!
what software are you using, please?
@@kdearsarakdearsara9377 Musescore 4! It is free!
@@drewracer777 Awesome! Do you mind providing a link to download it or an APK file?
@@kdearsarakdearsara9377 musescore.org/en
@@drewracer777 Thank you, thank you, thank you!
as someone who knows nothing about music, why doesn't it simplify to 7/8???
It can... But The groove adds up to 14 3+3+3+3+2, which does not work in 7, but 7 does kinda work, 14 is hard man
:O
What program is this?
@@jacobsparkstudios528 musescore 4 for the song, and I edited this with Microsoft clipchamp, both are free programs
@@drewracer777 thanks!
stop reminding me i need to finish my 13/7 song
its 7/8
So you wrote music in 7/8, because highest common multiple is 2. Still sounds good.
Idk why you Americans make your fractions so complex. 14/16 can be easily simplifed to 1/1 with the use of rounding and simple maths.
Please learn to use accidentals correctly. That g flat is really awkward
@@marcoponzio1644 yeah, g flats are weird in the key of g minor…