Lewis Structure of SO4(2-) (Sulfate) CORRECT

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @thehigherevolutionary
    @thehigherevolutionary 3 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    This video was posted in 2013, but in 2021 - It's helping me to fully ingest some key points I missed when I first took gen-chem in undergrad. Thank you.

    • @theunderdogstg808
      @theunderdogstg808 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bro can u tell me how many lone and bond pairs are present in so4^2-

    • @goldengamer5256
      @goldengamer5256 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So do i 🤣😇🥰

    • @easyfoodrecipes.
      @easyfoodrecipes. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theunderdogstg808
      bond pair = 6
      Lone pair = 10

    • @AnshuEXCEL
      @AnshuEXCEL ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Now 2023 😮

    • @AngelBagel03
      @AngelBagel03 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AnshuEXCELnow 2024

  • @miarathjens6937
    @miarathjens6937 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This is ABSOLUTELY the ONLY video I have ever seen that completely explains formal charges in resonance structures!!!!!! THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU. I could cry of happiness :')

  • @PatrickBusch0
    @PatrickBusch0 9 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    You're an excellent teacher. Thanks for breaking this down step by step and using such clear language! :)

  • @shawol373
    @shawol373 8 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    You're the only one that made this make sense! Thank you so much

  • @kamaldeka3005
    @kamaldeka3005 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hey, thank you so much. You don't know how great your help have been during these lockdown days. I pray that you are safe. Thanks for showing it step by step. I couldn't grasp in my class and I was very scared to ask the teacher. I can't thank you enough for this.

    • @chemistNATE
      @chemistNATE  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Self teaching is getting huge right now. Thanks for the encouragement.

  • @mcordier
    @mcordier 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm French and you're my chem savior. Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU.

  • @s.madheshkrishna3352
    @s.madheshkrishna3352 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Oh finally, a sigh of relief. That was a great explanation!

  • @CORPSE77
    @CORPSE77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    OMG, THIS IS THE BESTexplanation video ever and the SMARTEST. Omg, I can't believe how simple and clear it is now for me to understand. THANK YOU

  • @bssgaming5126
    @bssgaming5126 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks! This was one of those few videos which was perfect for me. It was crisp and precise and delivered what it had to. Thanks once again.

  • @cubexworld1709
    @cubexworld1709 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Anyone Here In 2024

  • @defeatedskeptic311
    @defeatedskeptic311 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    For anyone that may be confused, 3rd period elements and beyond can sometimes have their d orbitals become involved in bonding.

    • @64hkal
      @64hkal 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +DefeatedSkeptic I don't think people learning this have learned about hybridization and pi-bonding with the lone d-orbital yet

  • @tubluntuntu8632
    @tubluntuntu8632 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the easiest way to write Lewis dot structure I have ever found in youtube 👍👍thank you so much sir 🙏

  • @woutuuur
    @woutuuur 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is amazing. Even though English is not my native language I think this will save my exams

  • @cuzinjesus6900
    @cuzinjesus6900 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    omg, the only video on TH-cam to actually explain FC

  • @ShoubhitPA2004
    @ShoubhitPA2004 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You are the best teacher man. Please continue to help people who had almost given up on chemistry !😊

  • @americanbee
    @americanbee 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you! I just understood how the formal charges help to get a correct drawing and why.

  • @meeounadjani3484
    @meeounadjani3484 10 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thank you very much! I wish you were at my college as a Chem tutor you're so helpful!

    • @chemistNATE
      @chemistNATE  10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      meeoun adjani Thanks! What College, and are they hiring? :D

    • @sakama40
      @sakama40 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +chemistNATE
      so sulfur has 12 electrons

    • @jagritbudhiraja6391
      @jagritbudhiraja6391 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      college? lol i have to study this shit at school

    • @downthrownetwork
      @downthrownetwork 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yup
      Welcome to crazy lol

  • @totu7071
    @totu7071 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much. You helped me understand this when no one else could.

  • @alpha27x
    @alpha27x 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I wish I could get him as my chemistry teacher 😍😍😍

  • @tabishbeast8271
    @tabishbeast8271 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    why sulphur has 12 electrons in the outermost shell where u can only have 8 electrons

    • @shaifalipruthi2961
      @shaifalipruthi2961 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      As mentioned by him, sulphur can break the octate rule

    • @azadalam9228
      @azadalam9228 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It has 3d orbital which can accommodate more electrons

    • @andrewcorrie8936
      @andrewcorrie8936 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Elements in Period 3 and higher (i.e. periods 4, 5..) can "expand the octet". In simple terms, their outer shells can accommodate more than 8 electrons. It happens commonly in P, S, Cl, Br and I

    • @meetparmar1104
      @meetparmar1104 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sulphur has valence shell no equal to 3 so it also has 3d orbital in which it can accommodate extra electron

  • @eshadoshi5467
    @eshadoshi5467 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for the video. I have a question though. Why can't we have 4 double bonds instead and thus only S will have -2 formal charge?

  • @teenieweenied
    @teenieweenied 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you!!! This helped so much! I was always confused as to why the molecules would become a double bond but now it’s all clear. Thanks great teaching :)

  • @ramtawonks1141
    @ramtawonks1141 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super super teaching👍👍👍,thank you so much sir.From Manipur

  • @ananyasukumaran721
    @ananyasukumaran721 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about dative bond...?
    Sir I'm from India....I don't see any other videos of you ....but by waching only this video I'm very sure that ur a best chemistry tr.....thank uu sir.....

  • @hamustur
    @hamustur 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much, this video was only 6 minutes long but it cleared up an hour of confusion I had in class!

  • @WTFisThisN00bDoin
    @WTFisThisN00bDoin 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You said that there was only one resonance structure, Would it not work if any of the two bonds were double bonds? in which case there would be 6 structures that fit.

  • @sabrinasabrine2246
    @sabrinasabrine2246 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks teacher l al from morocco🇲🇦✌️

  • @hkookh
    @hkookh ปีที่แล้ว

    This video actually saved my life.. In the today's exam we had that👀

  • @ramirocastillo5647
    @ramirocastillo5647 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    great video!! I have a question though... when drawing the lewis structure you put the element with the least electronegativity in the middle? or the most electronegative? my professor told us the most electronegative..?

  • @rahafalsahafi6774
    @rahafalsahafi6774 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im from Saudi Arabia and i wanna say that ur video is the bestttttt thaaaaaaaank u so soooo much😭😭😭😭❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @nounou2665
    @nounou2665 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The sulfate ion now does not satisfy the covalency. Sulphate has covalence two, but now in this drawing 4 electron pairs. How is that possible?

    • @boydmckiel8320
      @boydmckiel8320 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am confused by that also. Has 6 valence electrons but how did he get only 4?

  • @ParinitaRoyPayel
    @ParinitaRoyPayel ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks sir, I'm from Bangladesh,,love from my country ❤❤

  • @avishkarghodke4205
    @avishkarghodke4205 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU SO MUCH! this cleared my doubt
    especially u even told the formal charge on sulfur

  • @salemouail627
    @salemouail627 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    years ago , i watched some of ur videos and aced my chemistry exam ,
    u literally saved my life back then ! :D

  • @j3nnifert
    @j3nnifert 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    only video that i've actually understood thank you

  • @thisisjoel691
    @thisisjoel691 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent explaination 💟💟 God bless u sir

  • @dinieadilah4809
    @dinieadilah4809 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the most accurate explanation ngl love it!!!

  • @shujriz2286
    @shujriz2286 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If we make third oxygen double bond along with the two we have made. Wudnt it further lower the formal charge.. And sulphur can expand octet

  • @lailakahn826
    @lailakahn826 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    omg i finally see the light.. thank you!

  • @origamicaptain5664
    @origamicaptain5664 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    umm doesn't a bond count as 2 electrons? If each carbon brought 6 electrons + the bond wouldn't that be 8 electrons?

  • @downthrownetwork
    @downthrownetwork 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    OMG! So helpful for my biochem undergrad
    Thank you! :)

  • @a7hi_nav
    @a7hi_nav 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10 year old video and still helping a high schooler like me :3

  • @bara4795
    @bara4795 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    beautiful explanaition, can i cry now?

  • @clwoni1414
    @clwoni1414 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I understood this thanks to you ! Keep up the good work

  • @scarletstudy7634
    @scarletstudy7634 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So we want the center atom the have zero or close to zero charge, like is that prioritized over the charge of other electrons?

  • @susanan9719
    @susanan9719 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good explanation. Easy to understand, thanks. 👍👍

  • @shailajapaturi1543
    @shailajapaturi1543 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi sir, your videos is very much useful, I have doubt that how can we know that the formal charge should be used & also how can we confirm that the picture of sulphur to oxygen in a single bond is correct or wrong, please can you clarify my doubt
    Thanking you

  • @sarahsalehi8651
    @sarahsalehi8651 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u so muchhh. What my chem teacher didn't!!!

  • @ellenbrigitta6637
    @ellenbrigitta6637 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oxygen has valence 6 and it is mention in the video, but why is it written/counted as only 4

  • @adeshgarg9483
    @adeshgarg9483 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't understand in SO4 here 4 is there for which thing either for valency or for electrons . Please tell!

  • @neverchanging8643
    @neverchanging8643 ปีที่แล้ว

    You explained it in such simple terms thank u so much

  • @TasnimAfi
    @TasnimAfi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the video was uploaded in 2013 but it's about to reach 2025, but it is helpful yet. that's so good.

  • @andywolff4617
    @andywolff4617 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can you have cumulated pi bonds on sulfur without forcing a linear bond geometry? I am especially confused since it has been shown (about 1990) that d orbitals do not actually participate in hybridization?

  • @romulomisaelespinozasancho3717
    @romulomisaelespinozasancho3717 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tal vez no me entiendas pero ¿Por que no pudo generar dos enlaces dativos el "S"?

  • @meganvelcro866
    @meganvelcro866 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your videos help me SO MUCH! THANK YOU!!!!!

  • @ranahurma92
    @ranahurma92 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you, it is very beneficial to prepare petrucci general chemistry chapter 10

  • @incredibledews66
    @incredibledews66 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But you have not talked about the -2 charge around the bracket

  • @mironshokhmukhtorov8845
    @mironshokhmukhtorov8845 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you for your video!THIS IS REALLY HELPFUL!

  • @manuellinnenberg
    @manuellinnenberg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How is the octetrule fulfilled on the Oxygen and the Sulfur?

  • @streetrider__4
    @streetrider__4 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you please tell me the number of lone pair and bond pair of electrons in this ion... Please

  • @dmitriminto841
    @dmitriminto841 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    what after when you draw the structure out, how do you know what to name it? The names consist of tetrahedral, pyramidal and stuff like that

  • @kristinhouser3886
    @kristinhouser3886 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a list somewhere of which elements can break the octet rule?

    • @kristinhouser3886
      @kristinhouser3886 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also my "people" (which is Aktiv Chemistry) say that 2 is the incorrect number of resonance structures.😭

    • @chemistNATE
      @chemistNATE  ปีที่แล้ว

      Dang! Do they say it's 6 ? Which is EVERY combination of 2 double bonds + 2 single bonds around the sulfur?

    • @kristinhouser3886
      @kristinhouser3886 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chemistNATE Been a few days but yes, I think they wanted all 6

  • @banshilal5965
    @banshilal5965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am indian ...thank you very much for this video

  • @shivanirathi3198
    @shivanirathi3198 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have really cleared my concept

  • @itechenthusiast2185
    @itechenthusiast2185 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the two additional electrons are from where?

  • @Kaushal--2211
    @Kaushal--2211 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    U say that the formal charge is the number of electrons it brought - the number of electrons it has, but when U calculate that later, the sulphur actually gets a -6 F.C, I am confused ༼;´༎ຶ ۝ ༎ຶ༽

  • @angelinachristine960
    @angelinachristine960 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was so helpful. I cannot thank you enough!

  • @parveenaakther4540
    @parveenaakther4540 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If the other oxygen has 1 bond why didnt u added another 2 bonds bw them

  • @christophersutton6117
    @christophersutton6117 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    why is sulfur only allowed 6 bonds? shouldnt it be able to fill its d-shell, up to 18 electrons?

    • @hsparks5361
      @hsparks5361 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Christopher Sutton Technically yes, but steric factors, such as each electron's same charge repelling each other, keep atoms from completely filling up their d-shell

  • @mostafahashem3564
    @mostafahashem3564 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for you , but I have question ..how no. of electron on O atom still 6 electron and form abond with S???

    • @mohebmohi
      @mohebmohi 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because according to the octet rule, it tends to have 8 electrons around it's atom
      mesa 3aleek :D

  • @ajinkyajadhav3424
    @ajinkyajadhav3424 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Sir as you have explained that F.C. = no. Of e-* brought minus no. Of e- have or has but sir actually the fomula is like this
    F.C. = total no. Of e- minus total no. Of non bonding e- minus half of no. Of no bonding e-..
    (*e- is electron)..Actually I was trying to draw Lewis structure clf3 molecule at that time come across this formula..from above your mentioned formula we cant draw Lewis structure for CLF 3.. 🤗🤗🤗

    • @888167
      @888167 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      that comes to exactly the same...

  • @ananyamahapatra3128
    @ananyamahapatra3128 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why must formal charge be as close to zero as possible?

  • @yeppy013
    @yeppy013 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This cleared my understanding of this topic

  • @audreysweeney5338
    @audreysweeney5338 ปีที่แล้ว

    You didn't count the electrons afterwards to equal 32. Or explain.

  • @pavithraarumugam5884
    @pavithraarumugam5884 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does this molecule has dative bond?????how???

  • @SharpshotTV
    @SharpshotTV 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful man. Thanks for helping me understand what my instructor didnt. Lol

  • @pruthvibhat291
    @pruthvibhat291 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why we have to change the formal charge??? Please help me

  • @tacoman107
    @tacoman107 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    PLZ help with chem. I got some questions.
    1. When counting the original number of electrons, you add the plus two from the extra two electrons. Why is that? Do you just go with it because it's given? Is there a reason as to why the extra two electrons are there to begin with? Like... where tf did they come from?
    2. Why is the octet rule being broken for Sulfur? Is it because of the row it's in?
    3.Originally I thought that once the Sulfur had 8 electrons when connected to Oxygens (at the beginning), the remaining two electrons Sulfur had would transfer over to an oxygen. I know this wouldn't work, but could someone explain why?
    Chemistry is one of those subjects that I consider so easy... that it's insanely difficult. Be it from overthinking or from thinking of something unrelated when looking at chem.

  • @pornimadongare5408
    @pornimadongare5408 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think this video was made for me only ... ty soo much my doubt got clear ty

  • @cristianebastos8310
    @cristianebastos8310 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing!! Você explica muito!!! Thank you!!

  • @nandaraviteja
    @nandaraviteja 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    moreover i dont understand this method oxygen must have 5 electrons after making bond with sulphur why did u just put total valence electrons after bonding

  • @LoveDayandAge
    @LoveDayandAge 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thorough and very helpful. Thank you!

  • @HindJomail_Ilvbty
    @HindJomail_Ilvbty 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    THANK YOU
    I finally get it!

  • @niluplidissanayake7529
    @niluplidissanayake7529 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally got it😊😊 Thank u soo much☺☺

  • @aikobusia4981
    @aikobusia4981 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does it follow the octet rule ?

  • @patricklin5384
    @patricklin5384 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    why didnt you just have double bonds on all four oxygens?

  • @sofiastar9197
    @sofiastar9197 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir for the excellent explaination

  • @sarabalhas638
    @sarabalhas638 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow amazing thank you

  • @mohiniattimani948
    @mohiniattimani948 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Sir

  • @QWERTYUIOP-kv7bc
    @QWERTYUIOP-kv7bc 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shouldn't we also consider number of bonds

  • @tranquiduong2210
    @tranquiduong2210 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    you saved my life, thanks!!!

  • @markusteuschler9176
    @markusteuschler9176 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was a great explanation, thank you!

  • @Ella-ns9ps
    @Ella-ns9ps 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    WHYYYY YOU ARE NOT MY TEACHERRRRRRR WHYYYY .. Thank you so so very very much

  • @sumanpurohit2506
    @sumanpurohit2506 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do the oxygen atoms remain in resonance ?????
    Please reply. ...
    I really want to Know .
    And and and Your have such a great video .

  • @siththysalmiya152
    @siththysalmiya152 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    EXCELLENT EXPLANATION 👍👍😃😃

  • @Emma-hq8cs
    @Emma-hq8cs 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    why do you take 2 electrons and than take it like 1 electron?

    • @Soytheist
      @Soytheist 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Emma 1
      Because it is in a bond, he uses a nice way to determine the formal charge; but you can actually use this formula if you're uncomfortable with his method -
      Formal Charge = V - L - 0.5*S
      V -> No. of valence electrons
      L -> No. of Lone Pair electrons
      S -> Electrons in bond formation

    • @Emma-hq8cs
      @Emma-hq8cs 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thnx Aditya Prakash

    • @Braxium1
      @Braxium1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Emma 1 think of it this way
      the electrons are moving around in the bond, there are two atoms sharing the electrons, and in average, if you divide the space the bond covers into the parts the atoms have themselves, the atoms have "half" the electrons on their own side. But they also have both the electrons in their clouds because they have them going back and forth in the bond

    • @Emma-hq8cs
      @Emma-hq8cs 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Braxium thnx

  • @CORPSE77
    @CORPSE77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think i love chemistry a little bit now :)

  • @cr-wm8pw
    @cr-wm8pw 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hlo ,how to know no of dative bonds?

  • @RoshanVerma77
    @RoshanVerma77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    But Sir how sulphur can have 10 electrons there.........please please tell me please....I am very confused here please 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺

  • @mrgun9664
    @mrgun9664 18 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    תודה אחי. עזרת לי.
    אתה מסביר מעולה.