The worst part is my chem teacher is s o great like, as a dude. He’s passionate about what he teaches and you’d think that would make it more interesting, and I guess it does, but it’s really hard to make chemistry interactive. He does his best on that by bringing the class into interactive demonstrations using the students as a way to engage and help understand a little better, but it’s just not enough that the class can feel droning. It’s not like he can condense the work, it’s an hour an ten minute class. Over all I actually love him, easily one of my favorite science teachers, but chemistry teachers gets a bad rap because it’s just so un-engaging.
Yow the man is damn good! I didn’t even know what the lines meant! I love how he explains everything! It all make sense now and I realized I am not crazy.
@@CyanicCore when I told my teacher that I didn't understand the subject and asked for help "Well I don't feel like teaching what I've already taught before"
Ha! It's because by actively seeking this out, you WANTED to learn this material at this time. Whether out of necessity or desire doesn't matter. In class, were you as active of a participant as you were when you watched this video? Did you give your teacher the same concentration that you gave this video? This video is excellent. But, any chemistry teacher should be able to teach you this.
45 minutes of trying to understand the textbook... 15 minute video makes it all clear. Thank you for your clarity and visual representation of drawing Lewis Dot Structures.
I AM NOT EVEN A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER BUT I UNDERSTAND EVERY WORD THAT YOU SAID AND EVERY STEP YOU MADE. THANKS FOR DOING THIS KIND OF VIDEOS. -IM FROM COSTA RICA BTW
You have clearly defined the parameters of your scale between 0-10 by going outside of those boundaries you have rendered the aforementioned scale pathetic and unreliable, some might even say cowardly.
very helpful. thank you. my teacher is new to teaching chemistry and doesnt deliver the information well. this helped me for my test. finally got a higher grade than a F on a test.
This video was beyond helpful! I'm a Nursing major and have to take Chem 1151 & we're doing Lewis diagrams in class now. My teacher isn't the best at explaining things... so I was feeling so lost in class today. I searched for other videos and none made any sense. This video has been a lifesaver! I actually have some confidence in Chemistry now. Thank you so much!
I love you so much from the deeper most of my heart! Love you! It’s several hours till the test and I didn’t know how to draw Lewis structure. And I watched your video and understand them in a second
Love this video, I was having the worst time learning it in my 8 hour chem class.... and now I understand! so easy when someone explains in a simple way! Thank YOU!!!
@@riyasingh5505bro my professor speaks 30% English and everyday people walk in that class dead. She didn’t even teach us how to do these diagrams just should us examples😂
My teacher couldn't explain in 3 days of this topic which u did in 7 mins helped so much and relieved my stress so much can't say and it the best video than so many others videos on this topic so properly explained from the basic to complex.
IT'S 5:41 AM AND MY EXAM IS AT 8 AM THIS VIDEO LITERALLY SAVED MY LIFE. i was reading my handouts and i couldn't understand a thing so i watched this. after i watched this, i went back to my handouts and suddenly understood everything on the handouts because of the explanation on this video. thank you so much !!!
You're srsly better than my chemistry professor. He keeps on questioning our poor performance without reflecting within himself. It's a sad life I say.
I am 66.,a chemistry PG. Your visual refreshes my knowledge on Lewis Dot theory and rejuvenates me of my youth when I did my Course in 1972. Thank you.
A touch of a genius makes a whole lot of difference. I was bored to death studying my lecture videos but as soon as I watched your lecture on the topic, I became wide awake and interested. Thank you, sir.
Just in case you have seen the Lewis diagram of sulfur trioxide as something different (i.e. three double bonds as shown in Wikipedia or some old books), current theory suggests that the simple Lewis diagram I drew is most correct based on the lack of d-orbital participation in bonding and the calculated charges (sulfur is positive and oxygens are negative as predicted from formal charges). See: (1) www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2000-01/949098457.Ch.r.html (2) Suidan, L., Badenhoop, J. K., Glendening, E. D., & Weinhold, F. (1995). Common Textbook and Teaching Misrepresentations of Lewis Structures. Journal of Chemical Education, 72(7), 583. pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/ed072p583 (3) A. Reed and P.v.R. Schleyer, Journal of the American Chemical Society 109, 7362-73 (1987), ibid. 112, 1434-45 (1990); E. Magnusson, ibid. 7940-51. pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00160a022 (4) Cunningham, Terence P.; Cooper, David L.; Gerratt, Joseph; Karadakov, Peter B. & Raimondi, Mario (1997). "Chemical bonding in oxofluorides of hypercoordinatesulfur". Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions. 93 (13): 2247-2254. doi:10.1039/A700708F. pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/1997/FT/a700708f#!divAbstract (5) pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00368
ketzbook Hi, thanks for noting this. I tried pausing the video and making the sulfur trioxide lewis dot on my own, and came up with the S 3-bonded, but that would be like giving sulfur 12 electrons, which I guess is possible (it would be an ion). Still a little confused because in my class it was explained that elements like S and O wants 2 bonded and 2 unshared electrons...but this video has been immensely helpful so thank you!!
@@Homie-world No , I just don't understand what's wrong with you Indians . Whenever you come across such name , you consider the person as a Pakistani . Anyways , I'm from Turkey .
@@hamzashaikh6353 Actually india and pakistan are estranged sibling so whenever any such name pop ups we envisage it as a pakistani But any way love from India to you also 😉😍
This video literally made me understand this lesson in just 7 minutes than being explained in the class for 1 hour. Thank you very much! Currently reviewing for a quarterly exam. Wish me luck!
Thank you! I am trying to take chemistry online and reading it is very hard to understand. Your videos are clearing things up for me. I truly appreciate it!
Just imagine retiring as a registered nurse, using all your income/salary to pay rent and tax without any good investment or means of extra cash, tending to leave your profession/job that has been part of you for many years with no good funds. How will you cope?
That's why we need to plan ourselves via making extras in all we do because depending on paycheck that can give us our comfort and peace till we die is not guaranteed
I'm a nurse and I saw all this coming, so l've planned myself so I engaged in forex trading, little I know about the business though but so far so good, Forex trading has been my very means of savings lately while my salary goes for bills and utilities
I've heard a lot complaining about how unsafe crypto and Forex trading is but honestly speaking, if you don't experience you won't know, I've seen the bad and the good part of Forex trading
Investing in stocks and Crypto market is the best financial decision anyone can make but the crypto market is much more better than anything else at the moment
Be like Hydrogen, humble, simple, appreciating the smaller things in life. he's aware how desiring more would just make him less attractive and unable to form bonds with many others around him. More isn't always better and he sticks to 2 electrons instead. Be like Hydrogen.
2:17 our teacher taught us that H doesn't satisfy the octet rule even though it is stable by having 2 electrons. Not just hydrogen, but also Li+ , Be2+ and Helium violate the octet rule bcz they can't have 8 electrons in their valance shell. Other elements that violate octet rule are transition and post transition elements, which contain more than 8 electrons in their valance shell.
i agree just like in SO3, the lewis structure he just made is wrong... S can violate the Octet rule since it's an exception and can therefore have double bond in each Oxygen
I am filipino student,, and i understand quickly your example solving problem, very emphasize,, thank you so much Sir,, your the best teaching us,, God bless you always ☺️☺️😇
i spent like 3 hours trying to figure out how to do this from the video assigned to me, but this was 10x faster and easier to understand. i think im gonna ace this test.
As one who also teaches this example in a way that arrives at the same dot structure, I bristle at those who show more than one pi bond at an sp2 hybridized atom. They give no consideration to the unreasonable orbital overlap. SO3, just like nitrate and carbonate, would have an sp2 hybridized central atom with a single pi bond, as shown.
I cant thank you enough i am learning this in grade seven and I was sick he didn't tell me how to do this an we have a periodic table so now when we do this it will be very very easy! I have an exam sadly... Thank you though!!!
Samantha Locsin because in order to complete the L shell (or the octate) you’re supposed to hAve 8 electrons The need for all atoms is 2,8,8,8..... but Sulfur had 6 as it’s valence electron and it needed two more cause 6+2 is 8
@@apoorvakhera2961 if sulfur bonds with only single bonds to all three oxygen atoms, is it only the sulfur atom that contributes with all of it's electron then since the oxygen atoms still has 6 unused electrons each?
@@larabernardo740 hi! all atoms should have 8 electrons other than hydrogen so the video is actually right, he gave each of them eight as each line (bond) is the equivalent of two electrons
I don't get how the two Oxygens with a single bond have 3 lone pairs AND a bond. Since oxygen has 6 electrons on the outer shell and a bond, would those single bonds count as dative (where both electrons come from Sulphur)?
I advise against thinking about where the electrons "came from". Yes, you could think of it as dative, but it is better to look at the molecule as a whole. The molecule has a certain number of electrons, and we put the electrons in as bonds or lone pairs to give every element an octet if possible. In the ion hydroxide, oxygen has 3 lone pairs and one single bond, and that bond is definitely not dative. In any case, this leaves oxygen with a -1 formal charge, which supported by high level calculations on the SO3 molecule that shows the oxygens have some negative charge.
The only reason why I wonder where the electrons came from is dot and cross diagrams. These questions I'm doing ask for both, Lewis diagrams and dot and cross diagrams.
Oh. I'm not a fan of dot and cross diagrams, so I don't ask my students to do them. In that case, you could just say that both electrons come from sulfur.
SO3 is wrong, oxygen only has 6 valence electrons, and in the lewis structure you showed it has 7 also you calculated that there are 18 valence electrons, how come there are more than 18 v.e’s in your lewis structure?
Exactly, it’s actually a resonance, and Oxygen will have only 4 lone Paris electrons with its double bond and the other two oxygen with one bond will have 5 lone pairs. Am I right?
This video: Lewis Diagrams made Easy.
My Chem Teacher: Lewis Diagrams made Hard.
I FELT THAT.
The worst part is my chem teacher is s o great like, as a dude. He’s passionate about what he teaches and you’d think that would make it more interesting, and I guess it does, but it’s really hard to make chemistry interactive. He does his best on that by bringing the class into interactive demonstrations using the students as a way to engage and help understand a little better, but it’s just not enough that the class can feel droning. It’s not like he can condense the work, it’s an hour an ten minute class. Over all I actually love him, easily one of my favorite science teachers, but chemistry teachers gets a bad rap because it’s just so un-engaging.
yes maaannnn
@@christianmccauley7340 so true. Chemistry is so intimidating
Who ever made this video needs a raise.
That would be nice
or should run for president, but I guess a raise is fine idea
Yow the man is damn good! I didn’t even know what the lines meant! I love how he explains everything! It all make sense now and I realized I am not crazy.
I can never thank the people who make these types of videos enough, you're literally saving my grades💀💀
you're welcome :)
☠️
Are you a blink ?
He's saving my knowledge.
Samee
When you learn everything last minute before a test
honestly
Sarah Xiao fr
Going back before ap chem test LOL
test in 20 mins ggs
Sarah Xiao omg right
when your chem teacher doesn’t teach and you turn to youtube videos for help
I felt this bruh 😂😂
lmao true. I just gave up in the middle of the discussion and im like fck it theres youtube 😂
"Why are you not thinking"
A favorite phrase of a former chem teacher (who I had)
yep
@@CyanicCore when I told my teacher that I didn't understand the subject and asked for help
"Well I don't feel like teaching what I've already taught before"
You taught this 4.5x times quicker than my teacher but yet I learned more.
Awesome! I love that your speed comparison has two significant figures ;)
Ha! It's because by actively seeking this out, you WANTED to learn this material at this time. Whether out of necessity or desire doesn't matter. In class, were you as active of a participant as you were when you watched this video? Did you give your teacher the same concentration that you gave this video? This video is excellent. But, any chemistry teacher should be able to teach you this.
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Now I understand... You're better than my science teacher..
Thanks!
Kaye Ana Li I agree
I can relate
same
omg same
Bless up. Thank you for this. Got a Chem test in the morning, and I think you might've just saved me. Lol
yo r killin it at rapping
omg i love your songs!!
hi verified person
I just spent 8 hours studying trying to understand how to do this with an unknown element.... this video made it clicked, bless you for this.
This is my teachers whole day lesson in 7 mins
This is my teacher’s whole week lesson in 7 mins
@@graceee4813 This is my whole month's lesson in 14 minutes (I watched it twice cuz why not)
Tbh he kinda sounds like Dream. Or is it just me
This is my teachers whole lesson day in 1.75 min cause i played it in 1.25 speed
45 minutes of trying to understand the textbook... 15 minute video makes it all clear. Thank you for your clarity and visual representation of drawing Lewis Dot Structures.
you're welcome!
👍👍👍👍😹👍
Story of my life. I am happy now
Facts loll
this 7 min vid taught me more then my teacher did in a whole class period
I AM NOT EVEN A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER BUT I UNDERSTAND EVERY WORD THAT YOU SAID AND EVERY STEP YOU MADE. THANKS FOR DOING THIS KIND OF VIDEOS. -IM FROM COSTA RICA BTW
You're welcome!
Same lol
Pura vida :)
I want to marry this video. It made my understanding from a 0 to a full on 11 (on a scale of 0-10)
Me as well.
You have clearly defined the parameters of your scale between 0-10 by going outside of those boundaries you have rendered the aforementioned scale pathetic and unreliable, some might even say cowardly.
Paris Coroneos we didn’t need you to use the vocabulary of Albert Einstein’s teacher.
@@ComandaKronikk ah yes, but you forgot one key element, and that would be no one gives a shit so sod off
it’s a joke..
saved my life, I took chem in like freshman year and completely blanked on how I was supposed to figure out valence electrons haha tysm
This is simultaneously one of the best explained and best produced video tutorials I've ever seen. Thank you so much!
Glad it was helpful!
very helpful. thank you. my teacher is new to teaching chemistry and doesnt deliver the information well. this helped me for my test. finally got a higher grade than a F on a test.
Glad I could help :)
Same
i love how polite this guy is
got an E?
Can i just say, thank you so much for this video and for replying to the comments even after 5 years of the video being released. You're the real one
1015 people were unhappy because they only had six electrons
Make that 377 ;)
So they're carbon?
@@AdaamF___5399 It's a joke
@@Miguel-hr5gl 547 now
that's so cute
This video was beyond helpful! I'm a Nursing major and have to take Chem 1151 & we're doing Lewis diagrams in class now. My teacher isn't the best at explaining things... so I was feeling so lost in class today. I searched for other videos and none made any sense. This video has been a lifesaver! I actually have some confidence in Chemistry now. Thank you so much!
you're welcome, and I'm glad you have more confidence now!
I love people who teach with a calm and open hearted voice
I love you so much from the deeper most of my heart! Love you! It’s several hours till the test and I didn’t know how to draw Lewis structure. And I watched your video and understand them in a second
I'm so glad!
Love this video, I was having the worst time learning it in my 8 hour chem class.... and now I understand! so easy when someone explains in a simple way! Thank YOU!!!
8 HOURS????
@@jovivianed4602I'd kms
When you don’t pay attention to class so you come to TH-cam 👁👄👁
Or your instructor is pure chaos and you need a clear concise run through lol
Not really though. Some don't get it easily in class.
@@riyasingh5505bro my professor speaks 30% English and everyday people walk in that class dead. She didn’t even teach us how to do these diagrams just should us examples😂
the way i wasted 7 months of my life in learning a concept of 7 min is ✨immaculate✨
7 months?!? I've heard of people spending 2-3 weeks on this before, but 7 months is a new record ;)
@@ketzbook I wasted 1 week 😂🙌
My teacher couldn't explain in 3 days of this topic which u did in 7 mins helped so much and relieved my stress so much can't say and it the best video than so many others videos on this topic so properly explained from the basic to complex.
IT'S 5:41 AM AND MY EXAM IS AT 8 AM THIS VIDEO LITERALLY SAVED MY LIFE. i was reading my handouts and i couldn't understand a thing so i watched this. after i watched this, i went back to my handouts and suddenly understood everything on the handouts because of the explanation on this video. thank you so much !!!
Wow this made better sense than Professor Dave. Ketzbook actually took his time to explain it and I actually understood it.
Thanks!
THANKS, you just saved my chem grade.
thank you so much for this! i wasted like half an hour to understand this from my textbook, you helped me in 7 minutes.
Thank you so much for making this video. The way my professor explained this I was lost and I caught on to yours in the 7 minutes.
Glad to hear that ;)
Nice
You're srsly better than my chemistry professor. He keeps on questioning our poor performance without reflecting within himself. It's a sad life I say.
I am 66.,a chemistry PG. Your visual refreshes my knowledge on Lewis Dot theory and rejuvenates me of my youth when I did my Course in 1972. Thank you.
No words but want to say you have made me satisfied with the topic
UGH YOU’RE SUCH AN AMAZING TEACHER. THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!!!
A touch of a genius makes a whole lot of difference. I was bored to death studying my lecture videos but as soon as I watched your lecture on the topic, I became wide awake and interested. Thank you, sir.
Just in case you have seen the Lewis diagram of sulfur trioxide as something different (i.e. three double bonds as shown in Wikipedia or some old books), current theory suggests that the simple Lewis diagram I drew is most correct based on the lack of d-orbital participation in bonding and the calculated charges (sulfur is positive and oxygens are negative as predicted from formal charges). See:
(1) www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2000-01/949098457.Ch.r.html
(2) Suidan, L., Badenhoop, J. K., Glendening, E. D., & Weinhold, F. (1995). Common Textbook and Teaching Misrepresentations of Lewis Structures. Journal of Chemical Education, 72(7), 583. pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/ed072p583
(3) A. Reed and P.v.R. Schleyer, Journal of the American Chemical Society 109, 7362-73 (1987), ibid. 112, 1434-45 (1990); E. Magnusson, ibid. 7940-51. pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00160a022
(4) Cunningham, Terence P.; Cooper, David L.; Gerratt, Joseph; Karadakov, Peter B. & Raimondi, Mario (1997). "Chemical bonding in oxofluorides of hypercoordinatesulfur". Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions. 93 (13): 2247-2254. doi:10.1039/A700708F. pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/1997/FT/a700708f#!divAbstract
(5) pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00368
Thank you so much.
ketzbook thank you. It was very helpful 👍🏾
ketzbook I
Humaira Tabassum where are you from? Are you Bengali?
ketzbook Hi, thanks for noting this. I tried pausing the video and making the sulfur trioxide lewis dot on my own, and came up with the S 3-bonded, but that would be like giving sulfur 12 electrons, which I guess is possible (it would be an ion). Still a little confused because in my class it was explained that elements like S and O wants 2 bonded and 2 unshared electrons...but this video has been immensely helpful so thank you!!
I was really struggling with the Lewis Diagrams, but I think your video helped clear things up for me. Thanks for posting!
I missed this lesson; now I have to re-learn it by myself. Thank you for explaining it thoroughly. BRO IS THE GOAT
That's awesome, i am also satisfied with your word 😂😂😂
Love from INDIA
Wow , Indians are everywhere .
@@hamzashaikh6353 are you from pakistan bro ??
@@Homie-world No , I just don't understand what's wrong with you Indians . Whenever you come across such name , you consider the person as a Pakistani .
Anyways , I'm from Turkey .
@@hamzashaikh6353 Actually india and pakistan are estranged sibling so whenever any such name pop ups we envisage it as a pakistani
But any way love from India to you also 😉😍
@@Homie-world Yes RACIST , love from Turkey !! 😊😊😊❤️
U cleared all my doubts......Thnx a lot...Keep inspiring..☺️☺️
This video literally made me understand this lesson in just 7 minutes than being explained in the class for 1 hour. Thank you very much! Currently reviewing for a quarterly exam. Wish me luck!
449 people were unhappy because they did not have 8 electrons
DRX2PO LMAO
DRX2PO......😁😁😁😁😁👍👍👍👍👍🤟😙
@@rajapalutla4985😄😄😄
Thank you! I am trying to take chemistry online and reading it is very hard to understand. Your videos are clearing things up for me. I truly appreciate it!
I learn everything in 8 minutes that I haven’t learned in class for two weeks. Amazing!!!
This was more helpful than the 30 minutes of my teachers complicated lesson
Just imagine retiring as a registered nurse, using all your income/salary to pay rent and tax without any good investment or means of extra cash, tending to leave your profession/job that has been part of you for many years with no good funds. How will you cope?
That's why we need to plan ourselves via making extras in all we do because depending on paycheck that can give us our comfort and peace till we die is not guaranteed
This is actually what most families are going through, tax and rents takes almost what they got monthly, leaving them with no savings
I'm a nurse and I saw all this coming, so l've planned myself so I engaged in forex trading, little I know about the business though but so far so good, Forex trading has been my very means of savings lately while my salary goes for bills and utilities
I've heard a lot complaining about how unsafe crypto and Forex trading is but honestly speaking, if you don't experience you won't know, I've seen the bad and the good part of Forex trading
Investing in stocks and Crypto market is the best financial decision anyone can make but the crypto market is much more better than anything else at the moment
This was so helpful for my chem test, thank you!!
Be like Hydrogen,
humble, simple, appreciating the smaller things in life.
he's aware how desiring more would just make him less attractive and unable to form bonds with many others around him. More isn't always better and he sticks to 2 electrons instead.
Be like Hydrogen.
And isnt it strange how we drink hydrogen
I'm kinda sorry for hydrogen :
does that mean I should get 2 girlfriends?
ayo this is so deep
@@endaddy4215 KABDKDBDN
I'm really liking these Lois diagrams
Thank you so much for this video I’m studying an hour before my test and I think you just saved my grade ❤ your the best
It was very helpful. I completely understand this and am not even in this class yet. thank you and please keep on making these helpful videos
I agree
glad to help!
2:17 our teacher taught us that H doesn't satisfy the octet rule even though it is stable by having 2 electrons. Not just hydrogen, but also Li+ , Be2+ and Helium violate the octet rule bcz they can't have 8 electrons in their valance shell.
Other elements that violate octet rule are transition and post transition elements, which contain more than 8 electrons in their valance shell.
i agree just like in SO3, the lewis structure he just made is wrong... S can violate the Octet rule since it's an exception and can therefore have double bond in each Oxygen
Yes this SO3 lewis structure is totally wrong ryt? ..just search it in Google u can get the real one
@@ihartu5549
I am filipino student,, and i understand quickly your example solving problem, very emphasize,, thank you so much Sir,, your the best teaching us,, God bless you always ☺️☺️😇
You are an excellent teacher 👍 keep up the awesome work, I understand this topic clearly now!!
great teaching so much more helpful then my chem teacher
Glad I could help :)
i spent like 3 hours trying to figure out how to do this from the video assigned to me, but this was 10x faster and easier to understand. i think im gonna ace this test.
When this video is 2 years old but still better than the other ones
Ikr
who's here cause they have a chemistry test next period 🙋♂
😂
I have
I'm here bc my course ain't making any sense
Meeee😂
me 🤪
Bestest lecture I ever see on Lewis dot structure and bonding
Hi I am a twelve year and i am learning organic chemistry by myself and this vedio was really good👍👌
Good for you itll really come in handy later
@@autumn1677 Thank you
As one who also teaches this example in a way that arrives at the same dot structure, I bristle at those who show more than one pi bond at an sp2 hybridized atom. They give no consideration to the unreasonable orbital overlap.
SO3, just like nitrate and carbonate, would have an sp2 hybridized central atom with a single pi bond, as shown.
wow am so sorry
thanks for the info
I learned more from this video than I did in 2 weeks of Chem Lectures.... Great Video!!!!!
7:03 I liked and subscribed at that moment
:)
great explanation!
You are my saviour. I didn't understand a thing of these diagrams. Thanks to you I am now confident in drawing these diagrams
This video is very helpful for my students...please share more video like this...
Simple , Clear and finally,....... easy
I cant thank you enough i am learning this in grade seven and I was sick he didn't tell me how to do this an we have a periodic table so now when we do this it will be very very easy! I have an exam sadly... Thank you though!!!
you're welcome and good luck!
@@ketzbook Thank you so much! I just did the test and I did very good for that section!
I’ve watched this several times in class and I STILL DON’T GET IT!!! I don’t know what to do anymore
6:40 is what most of you are probably after..
At least that was mine
Much respect from albania,you taught this to me better than my teacher👍.keep it up
can you be my science teacher?
hahaha I understand it clearly
Yes you are right
@@sagarpant9056 wiles
Yes I want to be your biology teacher I teach u HOW HUMAN REPRODUCE
@@ayushkumardwivedi415 what the heck..hahaaha
I was able to get this in the 7 minute video compared to my professor explaining it in 2 hours and still feeling confused.
This is the best video I found 'till now to understand how to manage poliatomic molecules and double (or triple bonds).
Thank you so much sir
You're welcome!
Thank you sirrrr HAHAHAHAHA YOU SAVE MY ASS !
You're welcome!
Omgggg..... Finally after 4 years of my board studies i have found a perfect video... Highly appreciated 😋😋😋😋
Tell me why I was looking for the kb element on the table
Can someone please explain why Sulfur is “unhappy” and why do they need to share another bond with Oxygen when Sulfur only has 6 valence electrons
Because sulfur needs a complete shell which means it needs 8 valence electrons . Ty and may the Lord God be with you in Jesus’ mighty name Amen
Why does it need 8?
Samantha Locsin because in order to complete the L shell (or the octate) you’re supposed to hAve 8 electrons
The need for all atoms is
2,8,8,8..... but Sulfur had 6 as it’s valence electron and it needed two more cause 6+2 is 8
@@apoorvakhera2961 if sulfur bonds with only single bonds to all three oxygen atoms, is it only the sulfur atom that contributes with all of it's electron then since the oxygen atoms still has 6 unused electrons each?
@@larabernardo740 hi! all atoms should have 8 electrons other than hydrogen so the video is actually right, he gave each of them eight as each line (bond) is the equivalent of two electrons
thankyou so much im studying 10 mins before sleep for the test, who knew a 7:30 minute video taught us more then 90+ minutes of unneeded teaching.
Than you Very Much ..😘😘
It Helped Me. A lot
you're welcome!
To the 515 people or more who disliked probably were too late to find this video and had given 8 valence electrons to Hydrogen ::DD
I have a chem quiz later, i can't believe a 5 minute TH-cam video can help me learn quicker than my 2 hour lecture.
Hopefully I don’t fail my exam tomorrow.
How'd you do?
howd you do
welll how did you do?
When you learn everything last minute before a test..and comment kro
I'm about to take a test! You are a life saviour!!
Omg I legitimately did not know that the numbers represented the valence electrons I-
People here in 2023
👇🏽
Literally learning this last minute before a test.
GreAt
😘😘😘👒👒off to u
**** ur vag***
sorr*
To all the homeschool kids we got this 😭
10 times better than my school techer,thank youuu..
you're welcome!
I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY SULFUR WAS UNHAPPY 😭
because sulfur needs 8 electrons to complete it's octect
Who's here because of online classes
Me bruhhh
I Love You, I Have A Paper In Less Than 4 Hours And I Didn't Understand This At All, Lifesaver
I don't get how the two Oxygens with a single bond have 3 lone pairs AND a bond. Since oxygen has 6 electrons on the outer shell and a bond, would those single bonds count as dative (where both electrons come from Sulphur)?
I advise against thinking about where the electrons "came from". Yes, you could think of it as dative, but it is better to look at the molecule as a whole. The molecule has a certain number of electrons, and we put the electrons in as bonds or lone pairs to give every element an octet if possible.
In the ion hydroxide, oxygen has 3 lone pairs and one single bond, and that bond is definitely not dative. In any case, this leaves oxygen with a -1 formal charge, which supported by high level calculations on the SO3 molecule that shows the oxygens have some negative charge.
ketzbook I understand, thanks. Really been scratching my head over this for the past two hours.
The only reason why I wonder where the electrons came from is dot and cross diagrams. These questions I'm doing ask for both, Lewis diagrams and dot and cross diagrams.
Oh. I'm not a fan of dot and cross diagrams, so I don't ask my students to do them. In that case, you could just say that both electrons come from sulfur.
ketzbook Very helpful, much appreciated :)
SO3 is wrong, oxygen only has 6 valence electrons, and in the lewis structure you showed it has 7
also you calculated that there are 18 valence electrons, how come there are more than 18 v.e’s in your lewis structure?
Exactly, it’s actually a resonance, and Oxygen will have only 4 lone Paris electrons with its double bond and the other two oxygen with one bond will have 5 lone pairs. Am I right?
@@Al-Suzuki yes, either that or all of them have 4 lone electrons while being double bonded with sulfur
This is a legend, easily understand it in five minutes while my professor explained like one hour
I take my hats off to you
Happy to finally understand a 5 hour class in 10 min