Granite can only form under pressure, otherwise all you get is obsidian. The makers of this movie know this and are lying for views. Shame on them for spreading lies and deceit.
There are a lot in the comments section too . Give them fiction people accept it but give them facts with proofs and no logical alternatives they reject it. Idiots are everywhere
Not to mention the very recent carbon dating of the cedar rod fragments prove khufu didn't have it built those shafts were sealed 300-500 yrs b4 he was born, which also throws this doc's work crews post construction of largest pyramid
This is by far the most detailed explanation and demonstration of how the pyramids were built and it’s also by far the most detailed accurate work on any ancient history ever. Thank you team for this masterpiece. It should be adopted by universities for history lessons.
@@kylemaducdoc The notion of "aliens did it" shouldn't necessarily mean literal aliens. It literally means "We don't know how the heck they - whoever they are - did it. We can't accept the idea of extraordinaire, so we decided to go for the bigger ridicule - extraterrestrials". It may or may not be aliens, which is immaterial. Even if it was aliens, having contact with them and employing their support is another feat by itself. That's why I don't take that argument literally, as it is irrelevant. In all variants, mankind was involved. How? That's what we need to find out.
Excelente, el mejor documental que he visto en mi vida basado en historia del mundo y la creación de las grandes ciudades, saludo desde mi tierra.....la gran Tenochtitlan.
Granite is generated from magma, underground so it cools slowly enough that three types of minerals form; they are quartz, feldspar and mica. The migration of the ions and the crystallization into these three specific minerals requires a LOT of time. The slower the cooling, the larger the crystals. I have seen granite in the Mojave Desert north of Scottsdale, AZ that cooled very slowly, miles underground. The individual crystalline components were up to 4 inches on a side! The premise that granite could be melted and quickly cooled, regenerating granite is ludicrous! This quick melt-and-cool process would produce lava, or perhaps amorphous obsidion glass, but certainly not granite. The objects and buildings made of granite are truly awe-inspiring and created by processes not duplicated today, but the melting-cooling hypothesis needs to be abandoned. I have melted basalt with a 12-inch Fresnel Lens and generated obsidion glass beads on the surface of the rock.
more low IQ a documentary is today, more likes he has. what about solar lens hypothesis on andesite? it seems tremendous to do, but possible. but on granite, anyway, there is a problem, pression...and the guy never asks himself about how to do molds...with an electric saw, and a good pair of eyes. lol. the documentary with Jacques Grimault was hundred times better. even if still far from perfect at many levels.
I think that you are missing the point, Lon. This 'movie' is nothing more than a 'suggestion of how the Pyramids' might have been built. There are dozens more, just like it!!!
@@johnsonhunglo1993 I like the insights into the possibility of poured geopolymer for the limestone blocks. That answers a lot of questions concerning the massive "blocks" that had to be lifted in every stage of construction. The white and brown limestone placement in the interior and casing is also well portrayed. I commented on the melting of granite and pouring it back into granite that was too implausible for me to overlook.
Thoroughly entertaining movie, thank you. Whilst possible, I have 2 questions.... 1. When you "melt" granite and cool it, you don't get granite, you instead get gneiss. To reconstitute the original granite, you would have to duplicate the exact pressure, temperature and cooling duration. Failing which, it will not match the parent rock. Also, what formwork would withstand the temperature of molten rock and remain so dimensionally precise? 2. Whilst grinding parent limestone and sandstone rock and combining it into a "concrete" is indeed feasible, the grinding process would obliterate the fossil remains of the original rock, as it is sedimentary and contains many fossilized sea creatures etc. The newly cast "concrete" would then be homogeneous and free of fossils, along with having a different crystal structure upon solidifying. Weren't fossils found in the stones upon testing their makeup? Also a point of interest, the formwork required for casting such huge blocks would have to withstand massive hydrostatic pressure from the wet "concrete", so what did they use to retain such dimensional accuracy in the final product? It is a thought provoking concept though, I am not denying that.
It's not about thinking anymore I just not logical Lens getting to 1000's degrees temperature to melt Well building the lens like that is a huge challenge by itself This is just theory as many others Molds are always the same , no blocks are the same width
@@lucaspodolsky8979 well no. It is not literally impossible. It's not literally anything. It is feasible though improbable, with what we know and understand at present. Logic is only applicable to the standards and knowledge available, it doesn't take into account future knowledge. It was illogical in the 1600's to imagine flight, but today that logic is revised to incorporate new knowledge.
It not even about logic Think about it What they use to withhold over a 1000 degree material to melt ,what kind of mold will stand up to this temperature-pressure few thousand years ago - Cooper??? Ups Cooper melts at arund 1900 F but how you create or rather weld the side Than on the top it is so precise I've seen hundreds of pour-in foundation - 'Masons these days use very heavy steel forms to make sure walls retain shape . These blocks do not weigh 100 or 200 pounds or 300-400 kilos Wooden molds ??? Not absorbing moisture???? - keeping perfect shape after repeat use ???? Different widths - each block has a different size width wise - how you have visible joints - at least 2 sides .When u pour concrete, it becomes one mass These blocks have 6 sides - forget about 5, but have you separate the 4th bottom side from each block - pour in the mold- let it dry and slide it ??It is not crazy glue which dries almost instantly, They had chemicals that speed up the process ????? Each block is very - CAN NOT BE POUR ON THE TOP OF THE BOOTOM ONE DIRECTLY WITHOUT SEPERATION OTHERWISE WILLPERMAMENTLY ATTECHED TO THE BOTTOM ONE There is around 2.3 million blocks in 1 pyramid .....
By the way For centuries, we have been moving forward very-very slowly-except Leonardo... If Egyptian had that advanced technology, let's say 5000 years ago and using Cooper, somewhere on the way to the present, we've lost plenty of everything
I've been watching documentaries so long now that Hollywood movies are actually boring to me... This is the The Absalute Best #1 Documentary I've ever seen! I must have gone back 20 different times to make sure I understood all the ideas... Definitely the best explanation!
Fun watch but lots of misinformation. Drops of water are not identical. Granite cannot be melted to reform and get back granite. Many similarily built structures around the world lack ingredients for cement formula, and so on. The truth seems to be much wilder, and I am not talking about aliens here.Ah, yea... If the stones were molded, why are they all in unique shapes? It doesn't make any sense to make a unique mold for millions of stones, instead of one mold per level.
I have watched it twice. I think it's brilliant and very plausible . The lens melting granite idea is brilliant but only having burnt ants as a child with a magnifying glass I'm still in hmmmm mode on that. Sounds better than aliens or a magical lost civilisation. Brilliant doc for a theory and i will watch again
While making concrete and pouring it into blocks or around forms makes a lot of sense, the giant lenses to melt granite into large forms as in this "documentary" needs several demonstrations for me to give this any consideration. Let's build these lenses, based on the initial suggestion using the materials mentioned early on. Let's then show that these lenses have the ability to melt granite at a sufficiently fast rate that would permit the molten granite to flow into the form and solidify in a solid piece the size suggested in this documentary. Consider that this giant lens still has one focal point to concentrate the heat onto a spot. How large would that spot be, and would the heat generated be sufficient to keep the molten granite in a pourable condition long enough to fill such large forms. There are some interesting issues being raised, but likewise there are many dubious claims.
The making of concrete and pouring it into forms doesn't make any sense. The blocks of the pyramid are not the same size, they are the same height but the other dimensions are all different. If the concrete form thing were true wouldn't they use the same forms over and over? Also filling the forms up the way that is depicted and allowing the block of concrete to dry enough before removing the forms would take far too long. The giant lens theory to melt granite is akin to the earth being flat and just as ridiculous.
@@bobkozalov8821 i worked with concrete making formwork with timber i think the worker would us different lengths of timber or you would make a block 2 sides then fillin that’s the quickes way to build a wall so build a black4 shutters to fillin 2shutter and so on thats the quickes way just saying
We've already melted granite with fresnel lenses from large flatscreen TVs. I would consider this debunked. It stops being granite after you melt it and doesn't become granite again after cooling. @@bobkozalov8821 If you only have two sides for the forms, and use neighboring blocks as the other sides while pouring in place, it makes sense that they could be different sizes as you wouldn't be concerned with them looking the same when they aren't going to be seen. Why spend the extra effort to make sure you position the forms in exactly the same spot when it's unnecessary? I think this can be confirmed by the rows being equal width while blocks within the rows are of different lengths. I would need to see them uncovered though, and that's a problem for obvious reasons.
This is typical pseudoscience. The fact that it took several years to film this BS and no one bothered with even a 1/5-1/6 scale experiment is all you really need to know about the quality of "research" presented here. Make a 1m lens with historically accurate tools then melt some granite and pour at least a brick sized block. It would've been worth much more than all your endless amateur looking animated "reconstructions" combined.
I am a Civil / Construction engineer and I will address my points over few comments: 3- What kind of humans can take the intense heat of melting lava to work near it and under a hell of intense concentrated sunbeam you proposed?
Why authors of that theory won't create vases or status out of melted granite with use of self developed gigantic magnifying glass installed as they have proposed ? They made it looking so easy after all~
@@Tom_Mroz I've seen people melt rocks with a magnifying glass probably 3 feet in diameter and it worked. But ya it wasn't grannet and the didn't melt the rock into a form or anything cool like that. But never the less it was some sort of proof of concept.
@@DrBe-zn5fv READ THE BOOK, THE SECRETS OF BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF EGYPT, which has completely new theories about this subject ( WITHOUT MONEY) on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com, accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Română ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; NO MONEY ) I'm open to hearing new ideas and new arguments. Pragmatic people always cling to the popular proverb, burning those on the "Galileans" who claim that the world isn't flat ,or that the universe revolves around it ; so I prefer to give everyone a chance to present something new; YOU NEVER KNOW ?, (what if one of the 78 novelties proposed in the book on page 57 , is finally accepted ? ). Have a nice day. Thanks for watching! Hănțulie Ionel.
Surely if you melt granite and pour it into a mould it would become much softer - naturally formed granite takes millions of years to cool down and form if you were to break it's bonds by melting and then you let it cool in a much shorter time, minutes or hours, you will be left with a finished product much softer than the granite you started with. Also would like to see evidence of those lenses to do the melting, I doubt those could have been even thought up in those days and they had no chance of making a flawless magnifying lense with the capabilities you mention - if they did have the thought process to think up those lenses then they would have had telescopes, spectacles, microscopes - ancient Egypt has plenty of precision, but glass was only at the glass bead stage at the time academics date the building of the Giza pyramids.
@@N3m3sis43 READ THE BOOK, THE SECRETS OF BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF EGYPT, which has completely new theories about this subject ( WITHOUT MONEY) on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com, accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Română ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; NO MONEY ) I'm open to hearing new ideas and new arguments. Pragmatic people always cling to the popular proverb, burning those on the "Galileans" who claim that the world isn't flat ,or that the universe revolves around it ; so I prefer to give everyone a chance to present something new; YOU NEVER KNOW ?, (what if one of the 78 novelties proposed in the book on page 57 , is finally accepted ? ). Have a nice day. Thanks for watching! Hănțulie Ionel.
This is the most realistic theory/study/documentary that I ever watched. At least, they use their common sense, not like those who says , the pyramid were built by aliens. My admiration to the team who made this documentary. Brilliant!
Listen, if you think that a hunter gather society barely out of the Stone Age figured out advanced geometry from farming, was able to craft a giant lens (yet no other evidence of glass making from these people) used to melt rock (😂) and figured out the centimeter from water drops (😂😂), filled and set 1 stone every 2.5 seconds, even filled other asymmetrical, wildly shaped and perfectly-fitting stones around Egypt (and elsewhere)...you don’t understand what “plausible” means. It had some animations that made it *look* plausible, but in reality it is still not. You can’t melt granite - quarried 600 miles away - with a magnifying glass 😂. And that’s what the king’s chamber is made of. No mention of this in the video. No mention of complete fossils found in eroded and broken stones. Concrete doesn’t have fossils. It tries to state as fact that the kings chamber is located where it is specifically for religious and ritualistic reasons, completely ignoring that all other pyramids have entirely different layouts. I invite anyone to watch a walkthrough of The Great Pyramid, watch people to struggle to climb the steep incline of the narrow passages (with stairs added that weren’t there originally), to nearly crawling through the tunnel “entrances” to the so-called Kings/Queen’s chambers, and tell me why you believe these people intentionally built it this way with a funeral precession of their King in mind. This video begins by stating more plausible explanations (advanced lost civilization, etc) before laying on the bullshit.
As an antidote to this misleading propoganda, that suggests ancient non- white, people's were not intelligent and needed outside help because they were brown skinned Africans, therefore unable to achieve great architectural feats. This French film depends on not telling you that the Nile flooded every year during which the Pharaoh hired the tens to hundred of thousands of farmers, who due to the anuual flooding become skilled stone workers after a few years. It also does not acknowledge, that this annual flooding was the perfect time to ship rock slung between two ships via the Nile with a carved channel that cut through the rock to the Sphinx. This film also overstates the hardness of the various rocks. Most of the Pyramids are limestone which when quarried from the Giza plateau is soft and easily cut with copper saws. "Ancient Aliens debunked" answers all of the misleading claims in this French film that says brown-skinned humans were too stupid to build the Pyramids. I suggest you all search for and watch "Ancient Aliens Debunked". If you value challenging information about ancient civilisations, if you value the concept of our ancestors being intelligent, sophisticated beings who had knowledge that they developed with their own intelligence search for this alternative move.
@@captainsensiblejr. more over they forgot to mention the fossils found in the stone! SGD TH-cam channel has great explanations and experiments on this
This film should be relaunched in cinemas worldwide. It would be good for Fehmi to be compensated. He has worked for us, for humanity. We can also DONATE to him.
The Egyptian pyramids, the Mayan, the Aztec, the Yugoslavian pyramids, the Alaskan pyramids., Did anyone notice how they have strong resemblance to the Meenakshi Temple and other South Asian ( southern India in particular) Temples?
@@saffiyehbrandhijaffer-mcne2800 they look similar however they are completely different in India and Egypt they worship or immortalize the snake and in mesoamerica (amarakapan) they believe in the dragons just like the melanated mongol. They had common knowledge but different idolatry.
Any geologist will tell you that small crystals in granite, mean that it cooled quickly at the surface, and that large crystals mean that it cooled very slowly (thousands of years slowly) deep underground. Also, I would need to see a demonstration of a giant magnifying glass melting granite at a rate of anything more than a trickle. Also, natural limestone, being sedimentary, would have bedding planes, whereas concrete would not. Are the bedding planes there or not? Also, making form work for the South American walls would be a nightmare because every stone is different and is rounded on the outside. Well done guys for doing all this work, but I am not sure this is the last word. People do carve stone you know.
Well there are bedding planes that can be easily seen with any Google image search. Not only that but the pyramid stones are full of fossilized sea creatures which formed the limestone
Megalithic stones were carved and transported all over the ancient world. There are places in the eastern Mediterranean and Egypt where a gigantic stone has been partially excavated, and was not entirely separated from the ground. You can also see chisel marks on the stones. I can't imagine anyone thinking the giant statues were made by pouring liquid into a statue-shaped mold. If they can carve and move giant statues, doing the same thing with rectangular blocks shouldn't be a problem.
And yet so simple....I think the reason the Egyptian gov is so hesitant to explore these ideas....it'll make the white man and his lies look weak compared to the black man and his brilliance of that era.
I have been fascinated at the construction of these for a long time. Watched alot of alien theorists say it was built by aliens. But Quran always said pharaohs architect built pyramids. Could never figure out how they moved such huge stones so quickly. And how everything was so precise. Watching this movie makes perfectly logical sense. Thank you for explaining
@vincentk.8653 to be honest I don't know much about building and I dont know any masons. But one thing for sure it makes more sense than aliens. Advanced technology make more sense than aliens. So how every they did it is better than hearing aliens cam and built them then left, or aliens created us as slaves or whatever wild theory they pull out of their a$$.
I had my own tile business and my helpers would always try to learn where to place the first ceramic tiles, like say a 200 sq. ft. Kitchen floor. You have to start exactly precise or if it's off by a 16th of an inch, by the time you get to the other side it grows and it's basically ruined. So theoretically the first stone will dictate the placement of all the stones to come. It's absolutely astonishing that the pyramid is exact considering its size, however it was done, it is the the top of 7 wonders of the world.
thats where the problem started.. inches and feets and yards and miles?? why?? why did some people do things that are allready perfect like the metric system, unnecessary complicated??
sorta .. but a tile job is in a dictated space where this was on a blank slate they could start anywhere any orientation any shape I know this because i play with Leggo's
Alien technology would have been the only way to pull off the mathematics of this ( let alone the physical plant build out). According to this documentary, the Egyptians were " apparantly"well on there way to understanding the physics behind nasa launches which is ridiculous.
I met a very intelligent and woke black man while on a trip to China. He just played this documentary the moment I told him I love watching documentaries. It's now 4:20 am, we just finished watching this MASTERPIECE, and Oh My God, it's a gem. Shout out to the entire team for creating such an informed piece. To my 🇨🇲 gentleman, thank you for understanding my love language ❤ Ps, I'll be sharing with all my people back in Kenya 🇰🇪🇰🇪
Among thousands of documentary films I watched, this magnificent one is the best ever with no competition.ive literally enjoyed every minute to the max...thank you all.
AfterUpon watching this, All the theory of egyptians carry large stones from far away to build the pyramid just shows we think more primitively than the ancient egyptians. this video make sense
Mostly makes sense except all these sites have quarries and most have stones that were left on the road side. Easter Island and Peru. Baalbak has two stones in the quarry so why say the base was concrete?
I totally agree with you 100 perecnt this ia the only theory that makes sense,now someone shuld demonstrate an experiment about melting granit ,i believe that they used that technology because no way carry such weight hundreds tons of tona of granite in one piece ,also there are evidents on the Giza plateau of melted granit and inside the pyramids itself
Why buildings exist like The Valley of the Kings digging deep like creacy, Abu Simbel build directly out of the rock, the Tempel of Karnak and Luxor? All this pleaces defenetly build in or from rocks. They would not do this if they had some kind of concrete and this buildings proof that they where able to work with stone and transport it.
This might be one of the most beautiful films i ever seen in my life. Thank you for the effort to rise a better future for humanity. From northeast of Brazil, here is another voice of the choir, till it's heard and settled into the hearts around the world.
If the Egyptians had developed massive magnifying glasses, they certainly would have developed smaller versions for home fire starting and even eyeglasses. Let's not overlook plain windows as well. One other thing to ponder: Glass does not deteriorate and there would be many examples of this being found if it was used for thousands of years.
Maybe they did have smaller versions? No current discoveries of even the larger versions. So cant rule out the smaller versions just because they are hidden away or unearthed.
Either way, since the tools for machining are seemingly non-existent, except in the forensics of the stone itself (cut marks, drill marks, etc), possibly a more modern cover up?
@@dematidesigns5444 That's very true but it's not my responsibility to to prove something didn't exist as it's impossible to prove a negative. It's the author's responsibility to prove it's existence or at least show evidence of it's existence especially when his whole melting granite theory is dependent on the existence of these optical technologies.
@@dematidesigns5444 you are correct that no machining tools have been found. But you are also correct that there is abundant evidence of their existence, unlike the granite melting lenses in this video.
Ultimate generational souvenir. The meter, golden ratio, pie 3.14, mathematics, astronomy, royal constant, and chemistry all in one. This is so incredible and amazing!
I thought that the diorite ball and the copper tool were the souvenirs here...This documentary is BS. "Hey, let's build a pyramid with lenses and concrete then leave a diorite ball and a copper thing as a souvenir", lol.
I've done form work & I can't fathom how the outside sloping blocks were poured, form work exerts a hell of a lot of pressure. Most of my time was spent shoring up, or preventing the actual "box" shape, slab or whatever shape was required from; lifting, moving, or splitting. Now I never stayed in that job to become a master carpenter, or even really skilled, but pegging down a form on a 45` slope with no anchor for the outside portion/face must have been damn near impossible. I won't say it couldn't be done, just that I can't imagine how it could be done, the idea of a concrete mix is not as mad as some might imagine, but my wife (went to Egypt) said there are very small fossils in many of the blocks and the process of making a polymer "rock" would surely destroy those. Never say never... I'm always open to learning something new, even if I'm proved wrong about anything. We should always remain open to new theories. Excellent video, thank you.
@James Stewart I've only limited knowledge about any of the seemingly miraculous buildings and building techniques these people used, sometimes I enjoy listening to theories people have these days, even the far out crazy ones. I can't put anyone down unless I have proof, or superior knowledge on a given topic, still, some of these ideas force you to think "outside the box" and that in itself can bring about new knowledge. I love these videos (even if they are crazy) in the same way I loved Star-trek as a kid, they're entertaining and harmless as long as you realise they are just "entertainment" and given the state of the world outside we could all do with taking a step back, pausing for breath and taking a moment to enjoy life.. with all the craziness in it too. Thanks for commenting, I hope you & all yours are safe and well, best wishes from a simple man trying to make sense of it all.
El mejor documental con fundamentos reales, fascinada con tanto conocimiento,la ciencia y las pruebas hablan por si solas. Gracias por este maravilloso trabajo.
This is an amazing documentary! As a retired builder I would like to ask how it's possible to pour molten granite into wooden forms, without them igniting instantly. I also don't see how its possible to slide a wood form off of fresh concrete .They have to be broken apart or pried away from the pour, and it can't be before it's completely cured. In order for blocks to be perfectly flat, the form wood has to be very thick or braced. Other than that I found this fascinating!! P.S. This is THE most interesting video on TH-cam if you're into history!
Maybe they used the method of old metal casters by making the mold from red clay?and as the for the forms according to how they were made they could have tampered a dryer mixture similarly to a shower pan for tile showers? Accelerator for drying? Just ?s
@@blindandok1415 Could be, obviously much of history has changed from what I was taught in the 50s & 60s. just the stuff they are finding in South America in the last 15 yrs. is astounding. Actually all over the world! It's changed my opinion on a lot of things.
@@seadog915 I appreciate your response.i agree the world is a bigger mystery than we may want to admit.there are others maybe we could share some video titles. I know of plenty.thanks george.truth is mandatory.but not so easily discovered.
@@blindandok1415 I was mostly referring to all of the cities and ruins they have found since the LIDAR tech. I watched one just recently where they found an entire city, hidden in the jungle!
@@seadog915 yes.i have also seen.but that is at the most softer of discoveries.the discovery of earth's hidden history is interesting but it's what is ahead thats unknown that is most interesting.most interesting times.
The only thing I find improbable is melting granite. Melting it is one thing, but creating the energy required to keep it molten long enough to cast is something quite different.
@@HotjeKvovg Nope. NOT possible. Also ... idiotic to propose, when moving a 50 granite block is MUCH easier and we KNOW FOR A FACT that's what happened. Do you idiots ever bother to read books - and find out what we ACTUALLY know about the Ancient Egyptians - or do you just rely on TH-cam videos for your "research"?
I'm working on ways to do this... not melting per say, but rather softening through sets of high frequency, localized vibrations. You don't need to melt a whole block if you can just make the part you're cutting into a putty. I'm in the hypothetical stage, and honestly, I have problems already.... Sound waves get LONGER in a dense material, because the sound travels FASTER through it. So, we would have to start out with sound waves too high frequency to produce through speakers. Perhaps they got vibrations to occur in dense materials first, somehow, maybe via chemistry, or electricity (piezoelectric effect). I'm thinking cymatics were used to transport the blocks if they were not formed and created.
@@growthisfreedomunitedearth7584 They had electricity and hifi (I've heard of the Bagdad batteries) to transform rock? That's no more than speculation of almost cosmic proportion. Copper saws, sand and water could be used to cut the stone. Splitting techniques, chiseling, drilling holes, it can all be done. Dig ditches, use the Nile and have stones drifted on rafts or sailed on boats close to the pyramids. So why UFOs, Annunaki, lasers, plasma cutters and the whole fantasy factory 'that Science always tries to hide'?
This makes alot of sense. Only one question. Has anyone bothered to actually try to melt any type of stone with a giant magnifying glass? The whole thing hinges on a central untested hypothesis and yet still makes more sense than anything I've seen put out on this before.
I wondered the same thing, but the basis of the theory still holds up, whether it was melted by a lens or some other means. There is another video on YT melting granite using radio waves. John Keely proved it could be done using music, or vibrations of a specific frequency. Given that light is on the same musical scale at a higher octave than sound, it's possible it had more to do with generating a specific wavelength than the heat generated by focusing sunlight. Just a thought :)
Might also have been chemicals, rather than glass. We have chemicals today that can create intense heat. Also there are signs of stone being "soften" several places in the world. Perhaps they where masters of chemicals for stone production after thousand of years of development.
yes Micheal Tillinger found out they used to melt granite in South Africa or what is now S,A check out some of his video's You will find out how they used to and still do it
I can't find a single credible example of granite being melted back into Granite of the same consistency it was. It always turns to obsidian or glass and not back to the origional colors or form in general. The pink granite in the Great Pyramid which is supposed to come from Aswan looks exactly as if it did come from Aswan, so they would have had to have melted it down and when it cooled it remained looking identical. At this point that would be an unknown heating process because other methods won't give you that result via sunlight or fire. I want to believe this and I will continue searching for the answers
Heat melting of sandstone, granit, diorite etc. results not in sandstone, granit, diorite etc. of different shapes, but in glass or glass like stone that does not look at all like the original stone.
Granit was not made in laboratory yet. Not a piece. Robert Gentry ... polonius halos in granit. I was wondering how they could melt granit with solar energy and create the same granit again. Magic
it´s a combination of natural elements mixed and fermented with the rocks and the sun heatin it to the point that it could be molded as some sort of rock jello cake.. :)
@Edwin Jansen actually there are various rooms and undergroud caves along with halls that have the right acoustics, i also believe they had already mastered how to use water and electricity for more detailed matters, so who knows how many more amazin ruins have been kept without rcords or solid proof. :)
uno de los mejores documentales y la teoria mas logica que he escuchado sobre las muchas estructuras que hay en muchos lugares de la tierra. GRACIAS por este documental.
It's amazing. I love especially how the documentary thoroughly explain how the ancient egyptians discovered the basis of the sciences today. It is such a rich history, and so astounding beautiful to learn how they learned from nature, and observation.
@@kimfowler6612 READ THE BOOK, THE SECRETS OF BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF EGYPT, which has completely new theories about this subject ( WITHOUT MONEY) on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com, accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Română ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; NO MONEY ) I'm open to hearing new ideas and new arguments. Pragmatic people always cling to the popular proverb, burning those on the "Galileans" who claim that the world isn't flat ,or that the universe revolves around it ; so I prefer to give everyone a chance to present something new; YOU NEVER KNOW ?, (what if one of the 78 novelties proposed in the book on page 57 , is finally accepted ? ). Have a nice day. Thanks for watching! Hănțulie Ionel.
The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off. I worry about when a population becomes distracted by trivia, people who put junk culture on a pedestal when its a tool to distract for the people. Meanwhile, the face of our planet, the biosphere, is being sharply changed by man, destroyed by "psychopaths" corporations, people die every day and the world goes on like nothing happened. The perfect dictatorship would have the appearance of democracy, a prison without walls in which the prisoners would not dream of escape. A system of slavery where, through consumption (Apple, Rolex, Nike, Johnnie Walker, Armani, Ferrari, Louis Vuitton...) and entertainment (Marvel, Disney, NFL, Star Wars, Adele, NBA, Pokemon GO, Game of Thrones, UEFA...), slaves would love their servitude (producing dictatorship without tears, a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies). That system is our enemy. It is all around us. It is the world, the wool, that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth (a prison that you cannot taste or see or touch, a prison for your mind). This system organizes our economy, our politics, our habits, our lives, and even provides us with rates and credit cards and gives us the appearance of happiness. And this seems to be the final revolution. You've felt it your entire life, that there's something wrong with the world, but accepted as normal (wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it). Like everyone else you were born into bondage. It seems that we have been born only to consume and to consume, and when we can no longer consume, we have a feeling of frustration, and we suffer from poverty, and we are auto-marginalized. And many are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.That's how it is with people - nobody cares how it works as long as it works. I only hope we understand that reason before it's too late. Fact is that when we are mesmerized by someone (corporations) we lose all sense of analysis and reflection. It is important to realise that everyone is born with a brain, so I'm being pragmatic by saying no one has the right to be ignorant.
@@thedangerous1 for example they implied the pyramid was composed only of precision cut stones which is rubbish. Also they implied most of those came from far away which is also rubbish, Giza plateau was the quarry for the vast majority of the pyramids construction material
When you melt granite it turns into black brittle glass. The quartz fuses with the feldspar - so once it cools, you have a black glob like what you see on the islands of Hawaii. The natural granite coarse crystalline structure is gone. Naturally formed granite is igneous rock which is formed over time by not only heat, but massive pressure, moisture and gasses. Different process.
@@jbfrodsham that's not tired ppl have learn a lot from tiktok maybe what u watch on their r stupid ppl but from I watch tiktok has a lot on there u can learn from or just enjoy good content
Hey the granite was melted with the lenses so that is possible since it utilises solar power but the concrete is mixed so that require different materials but have a go but it will cost you 😋
When you melt Granite, it reduces the component parts to a basalt like mixture, you cannot melt granite and have it re-harden into granite. This process takes geological time and a slow cooling under pressure to get the crystals to form. I like the originality of this theory but it cannot be replicated in the real world. See here th-cam.com/video/I3pCs7jwK7I/w-d-xo.html
Lol you got that right VERY MUCH "few knowledge and truth" , i think you accidently got that right 😅 (As in there wasn't much "truth and knowledge" at all . You know what youtube is like for idiots misinterpreting stuff, wish i didnt have to type this bit but experience shows i should , every time 😅)
Did you even watch the video I mentioned? I never said anything about cement.. 🤦♂️🤦♂️ that's alright, remain oblivious to the truth, thats all I'm trying to show you..
You can believe the bs the video you watched contains instead of knowing that precision high tech tools were used in carving the granite statues, pottery and obelisks that we can't even copy with today's technology.. but go ahead and believe they used magnifying glasses to melt stone, totally absurd, especially when you can look up videos of people doing that exact thing and it's plain to see that what this video suggests is ridiculous..
A true masterpiece as well as a new point in human history. To those that see this with an open mind and open heart...we are truly blessed to have seen this. These days proving the real truth to people is so hard. They dont want to accept it and would rather be a victim to the shallow circumstances of the bias mind. Thank you to all involved in this production. I am forever grateful for your effort to bring the true story of life back to the people of the world. Thank you again with love, peace, and inteligence.
There is truth here... theres also speculation, here... the all-black thing was hilarious. Molten granite.... the person who commented on this was correct.. it's impossible. Still though... much of this happened.. interacial just like Cleopatra. Of course it was interracial.. ultimate way to set rapport with closeminded tribes... send the dude thats their color to do the talking... Egypt, being the only civ, like this, probably had grest relations with the phoenicians... then i could see all this happening
@@teedepefanio5687 conceptually I love that they took it past the known speculations. Factually yes, I was shaking my head. However that doesn't mean I think I know more or less.!!!
@@Oldwhiteguy the building methods seem pretty on point that's my main gratitude for the production...other things I shook my head and said no no no out loud. The old drag the stones theory never checked out with me they were either poured and cast or uh...something.
The issue I have here with the “melting granite” theory is that there are actual experiments on TH-cam right now of melting granite. It turns to a glass/obsidian type of material. It doesn’t melt and pour back into it’s former state. It looks different
That's interesting, can you post a link? Perhaps there was something added to the granite to change it's chemical structure to prevent it from turning to an obsidian-like state. Do not see how those stones could have been lifted to the height and placement in the pyramid unless they were poured there in place... It's by far the most logical explanation I have heard thus far. Is there a competing theory?
@@rustedlight Do a search for Pierre Houdin. He shows how the Grand Gallery was used for a sled that acted as a counterweight to lift the large granite stones. There are actual scratches in the Grand Gallery caused by the sled riding up and down it. To me, it makes a lot more sense than the theory of casting stones.
I imagine the idea is to mix the components similar to when making mortar, melting it, and pouring it to actually make granite, not to melt and pour already existing blocks, like the "documentary" suggests. Doesn't mean that's any more realistic though.
@@Cerl84 Because only the Great Pyramid had chambers above ground level. It was the roof stones for the Queen's and King's Chambers that were so heavy. The regular pyramid blocks were small by comparison.
This is the best explanation of history and math I have ever seen or heard. More than that, everything makes so much sense. Thank you for sharing this with all of us! I hope that many millions will watch it!!!
everything makes sense except the very foundation of the build being a fallacy, as in melting sand or whatever they were melting into lava will never produce granite or anything remotely close to it
It's a bit like when David Childress' every other words are "I believe it's extra terrestrials" which sounds like Kenny Everett "It's all in the best possible taste"... makes me laugh anyway.
Obviously, the perfectly timed use of the Benny Hill song eludes you....and that's hysterical. The irony of punctuating the ridiculous theory with the BH song🤣😂🤣
You should make a 5 meter lens to demonstrate the simplicity of melting so much rock for us. Then explain why such a lens has never been found? If their use was so common??
@@MrSeannicholls stone melting is not new. The ancient temples in south India used this technique, liberally. Check out the stone melting videos by Praveen Mohan.
I would be more convinced if a replica lense was constructed so we could witness this molten rock theory in action but, nonetheless, it's a compelling theory
John Hutchison would have used 'frequency generation' to melt the stone . Not from heat but from temporarily disassociating the atomic structure with frequency . My assumption is the Great Pyramid was built pre-flood when they had technology far superior to what exists today .
Watching for the 3rd time and loving every minute! Thank you to all who made and partook of this film and research. May we never think we know it all, there is always something to learn.
Learn this.. if you melt granite it turns to black obsidian and will not resemble its original form, like the vases try melting granite and having large quartz structures in it not possible it would be mixed and uniform. As a form of black obsidian
I would like to see a demonstration of the building techniques involved in making a 5 meter diameter lens too...oh and by the way, what was the molten granite's crucible made of?
Interesting video with some plausible theorys but the Molton granite theory doesn't address the bore holes found, the disc like cutting marks left on some blocks or the partially cut blocks not to mention no evidence has been found of a "lens".
Also. If they were trying to hide this info from the initiated there wouldn't be any plain glyph of the technology. Like the pile battery/djed pillar, the dipole antenna/uas scepter, the light bulb, cables, generator, the oscillator, it's all there
It needs a lot of effort to produce a documentary like this, develop the theories and illustrate them in interesting fassion. Good job, thinking out of a box and try to give us an alternative to the common theories. Thanks for your effort. Nice script.
@@waylunnakar pouring granite isn't plausible - basic geology tells you that. Also there is a prime example of an obelisk being cut from the bedrock at Aswan. Why bother if you could just mould it?
you are programmed just press accept and update your mind and you will realise your is a lie and the only truth the one and only GOD whose throne is high above the earth and the heavens.@@waylunnakar
These are all great theories, the best I have heard in regards to ancient Egyptian construction technologies. In any case, I am a New Yorker, thus by nature a cynic and a skeptic. I am not sold on the melting of volcanic rocks via parabolic lenses during that epoch (4,000 years ago). If someone, ANYONE could explain THAT to me, it would be highly appreciated.
I'm guessing New Yorkers (and most other places in the world) must be VERY cynical and skeptical about their leaders response to the kung flu. Meanwhile in Florida common sense prevails and all is well by comparison. I agree with your comment but I'm not too concerned HOW they melted the rock, only that they obviously DID as this theory is so perfect it must be considered fact. If this idea is ridiculed and suppressed then we're right back to current times with the tried and trusted award-winning drug that Joe Rogan, for instance, used to cure himself. The drug that if acknowledged as a remedy would have PREVENTED Big Pharma getting even bigger with their experimental stuff.
The ideas presented in the movie are not "theories." They are speculations or at best "hypotheses." Theories require experimentation and multiple confirmation of those experiments and their outcomes. An idea that has become elevated to a "theory" has achieved a very high degree of certainty. Hypotheses are important in that they lead to further investigation, but they should not in themselves, be taken as the final "answer."
I'm blown away that this video isn't being highlighted, discussed and celebrated all over the world. One of the greatest mysteries of the world has been solved in a detailed manner and I'm just hearing about it because someone sent me a clip on FB
@@drwinstonOboogi What claim or claims do u dispute? Only one im struggling with is his breakdown of the Kemetic measuring system but even that one is hard to dispute. Nearly everything else is plausible
I laugh at my knees. Cant u see it is a propaganda video by the woke guys? It is full of ridiculous fake facts. E.g., pls check out what happens to the granite if you melt it!!
In another documentary they go deeper into the mathematical data the Pyramid conceals; meter, pi, the speed of light, circumference of the earth.. The Revelations of the Pyramid it is called; th-cam.com/video/2fS9ixfQ_no/w-d-xo.html
uuum... there's this thing called post rationalisation..? like when you notice that my bed is hanging off the ceiling and you see that if you look across two of the corners it points to the fridge which you observe has just been opened by the cat, so it must have been a hungry feline that lynched my bed, you conclude, meanwhile Syrius was nowhere to be seen, which was unfortunate for your hypothesis wasnt it but never mind?
@@davidleomorley889 [Ancient Egyptian] Pyramids were not tombs. There have never been any mummies found in any Egyptian pyramids. Neither are there any ancient Egyptian texts that state why the ancient Egyptians conceived and built their pyramids. Indeed, there are a number of ancient texts that state the pyramids were not used as tombs.
@@davidleomorley889 Gobekli Tepe is 11,000 years old, that's a fact, recently found, so how can we be sure that a civilization did not exist before the end of the ice age??, You are taking the side of academics, your view is no more provable than my view.
Unfortunately your hypothesis regarding molten granite falls apart when we look at what actually happens to granite when it's melted. It doesn't look like granite any more.
I am suspicious about that large heavy lens tilting up on that light timber frame. Has that process been repeated today, building such a large lens using primitive tools, melting granite rocks and setting the molten granite into moulds? BTW I really enjoyed this film. Thank you.
Yeah but series are like farts most of them stink and you have to listen to them and you can either golf clap or make a frown depending on how good it was but either way I don't need the guy who farted standing up screaming I farted at the top of his lungs
@@boopster4033 and you proved my point you don't want to listen to what I said and I don't want to listen to what these guys say... the whole point... They are opinions not fact... Unless you're f****** 6000 years old and were there you don't know for sure so you can postulate all you want but you don't actually know but the people with the most backing can scream their point and Theory from the top of their lungs... But they don't know
@@aarontighe553 You might check out Michel Desmarquet's lecture on TH-cam and The Thiaoouba Prophecy. All chapters, 1-13, are available on TH-cam as well...
1.- How could they build such large magnifying glasses? 2.- Didn't the wood that was used to contain the molten grain burn at 1200-1500º? 3.- Who gave them this level of mathematics and geometry? Were they Neolithic and knew all this? and did they not know the iron and almost neither the wheel? It is very strange and at the same time, improbable. I get the feeling that we are not prepared to fit the truth because the world would collapse. The documentary is very well done, but there are many things that don’t fit. Much remains to be investigated.
Between 14000-12000 Years ago the Sahara turned into desert. The People had to leave to their homelands and most of them reached the land of the Nil. They was forced year by year to learn to survive the floods. They learned 7000 Years how to manage the problems. And so they became what we all know the egyptians we all admire for their knowledge in so many things.
That's the age old question in almost anything. Which came first the chicken or the egg. They would have had to have a huge lens out of no where to melt the glass to make a huge lens. This is a question humans will never have an answer for. Aliens using lasers is more plausible.
I'll offer my standard argument against the theories in this film. Let's look at modern times for a moment. In the last 150 years we went from horseback to having rovers on Mars sending data back to Earth. The ancient Egyptians lived in the Nile Valley for thousands of years. If they had the knowledge indicated in this film, what happened to it? Given that the advancement of man is more or less linear, the human race should be much further along than we are if the methods proposed in this film are anywhere close to accurate. So what happened?
@@Mike-in3cp Yeah, I would agree on that rough timeline. It would be interesting to know how much of an affect it had on the world and its knowledge as well as how much it set things back. This was due to a meteor impact. Still, that's 2100 years BCE so all of that knowledge was lost? Caesar burned Alexandria in 48 BCE so that didn't help either. I would like to better understand the timeline of human knowledge.
In the beginning of the movie the Egyptian obelisks were to big and heavy to be moved by man. Later in the movie the Roman's came down to Egypt and snatched them all up to move to Rome.
After watching this documentary I went back to my maths and geometry! Finaly, there is a logical explanation of one of the mysteries of the past civilizations! Great doc!
@@MrGino714 it doesn't makes any sense , the size of the drop is determined by the amount of water of the drop, they didn't explain what was the standard drop, you have small drops and big drops it depends , you have to stablish a standard and a system , same as with the concrete I Knew about this when this theory came to light some years ago and it made total sense to me but still there are holes that need to be filled , I would say it's the more plausible but you can't accuse of someone to give dumb explanations and you do the same.
This was very interesting and compelling for about the first 2 1/2 hours. And then it went completely off the rails. Questions for the Director though: if the granite was taken out piece by piece then carried to the site to be melted down formed into shape, why is the great obelisk in the quarry already in its final shape? How do you explain the tube drill marks in the sarcophagus in the kings chamber? Why would they need to drill into it if they could melt it and shape it
They could have known both techniques, cutting stone in place, and pouring the "concrete" to make blocks. Its not inconceivable that they had other techniques considering how smart they were.
Try the magnifying glass and see what happens if you just walk off and leave it boring in a spot is dig out the molten marble to see how deep it melted all seems easy to understand to me and only hope with all the info we start seeing ppl build and just show if it does or don't but does seem like only way I can imagine
@@davidleomorley889 I think that certain folks have these videos made and then thrown on to youtube to gauge the reactions and gullibility of the viewing public. Perhaps a marketing company testing for upcoming TV ads.
The west has written history to suit the colonial empire building. But I think that in collaboration the world can change that to get the truth out to everyone
The cement seems feasible, but melting granite? Those temperatures would require special suits, eye protection, and the melted granite would not have a grain as seen in statues it would be a blob of glass.
You can melt granite, it becomes obsidian. You could try to pour it into molds but without some serious heavy machinery it will not create anything like a large stone, and it will crack as it dries, and it won’t be strong. But, again, if you melt granite, it will no longer be granite, which is only created deep inside the earths crust. You will be left is obsidian, like glass.
I think you will find the catastrophe that happened was the Younger Dryas impact and the sphinx is in the time of Leo and in general, the civilization is a lot older than said here.
@@gxhcsmhvc what the hell is that got to do with an event of 12000 years ago or the recognition of the great year of Leo??? Have your jab and go back to sleep!
Agreed. All of the geological, archaeological and anthropological evidence supports the period 12,800 - 11,600 years ago as the time of the Earth Catastrophe. Did you notice the movie briefly showed Immanuel Velikovsky when describing the catastrophe around 2100 BC? Velikovsky's theory is that Venus was birthed from Jupiter in Biblical times and as Venus was drawn toward the Sun it passed very close to Earth causing gravitational effects (like lifting the water of the Red Sea) and electrical, magnetic and other effects like raining hydrocarbons (manna from heaven and oil in the Middle East). Velikovsky presents mechanisms - based on Jupiter birthing Venus about 4000 years ago - to show how events in the Hebrew Bible could be "true." While Velikovsky makes a compelling case and interesting reading his theory has been pretty thoroughly debunked. So why would the authors of this movie include Velikovsky to suggest the Earth Catastrophe happened during recent times and the Egyptians are the "pre-Flood" technologically advanced civilization that was destroyed in the Earth Catastrophe?
Thanks for the documentary. It was enjoyable but also raised many questions. For one, more evidence is needed to ascertain how many of the blocks were poured versus cut. It should be possible to do some analytical chemistry to support your claims. The making of the concrete that you suggest should be demonstrated in your film (not just an animation), and then the results should be shown side by side with a cut stone for contrast. Also, a little analysis of the two versions regarding strength testing and resistance to erosion would be appropriate. Clearly, if the concrete did not have the same bulk modulus as the cut stones, there would be great risk for collapse. You also posit the use of solar power via a lens (magnifying glass) was used to melt granite so it could be poured. As far as I know, there is no archeological evidence for such a claim. The problem is that one could use one large lens, or many smaller ones to concentrate sunlight. In either case, there should be some of those lenses in the archeological record... and thus, they are conspicuous by their absence. Furthermore, assuming for the moment that such devices were actually used, there is the uncomfortable fact that when you melt the granite (mica,quartz,feldspar) you liquefy the crystal structure that formed during the cooling of the magma. Recall that the grain (crystal) size in igneous rock is proportional to the time it takes to cool, with larger crystals requiring more time to grow. All you will get from melting granite and cooling it quickly is obsidian, the black volcanic glass that forms when lava cools rapidly. Sorry, but that is just a geologic fact, and no amount of animation can change it. I'm pretty sure that there is no obsidian in the great pyramid. I would also like to mention that the current understanding of human evolution has humans leaving Africa multiple times over the past 100k years. All modern humans have their ancestry in Africa. As humans migrated to higher latitudes, evolutionary pressures have favored the lightening of skin pigmentation and other superficial characteristics such as nasal and eye structures. One such pressure is the need to make vitamin D from sunlight. Not surprisingly, many different characteristics have emerged as humans adapted to micro environments separated by geological barriers. The fact that Egyptians are dark skinned is expected given their environment. What is surprising is the persistence of darker skins in higher latitudes like Britain, as we now know that some of the preserved bodies dating from 5k - 7k years ago had very dark skin compared to many modern inhabitants. In all cases, the genetic characteristics of people are a consequence of the geographical journeys taken by their ancestors. Mixing politics and science never ends well. So while I applaud your creativity, you really need to develop your ideas more fully and provide more evidence for their use/existence.
I agree with you Charles. And in addition to your comments. Concrete is plausible but the big lenses to melt the granite? If the lens break due to accidents? The long workers line up the pyramid is ridiculous logistic point of view. They stay there all day long?? There have to be 2 lines, one for the return baskets and so on ! Sandu
@@jaredmoore2615 I did Jared. Did you read my comments? Workers move the buckets with concrete up the pyramid by twisting movements. That buckets appears to be minimum 10 Kg(in reality if filled with concrete is much heavier). Try doing that for one hour. Also when the pyramid is going up the movement is upward with the bucket (taking the bucket from the lower worker and giving it to the worker above)which is much more difficult to sustain for longer period of times. They must be SUPERMAN to do such kind of work. Or they have to have replacements every hour or so. Also the buckets have to be transferred back for reloading. The workers line became so long that the concrete in the bucket may freeze. Of course we can presume they will use fabric inside the bucket to prevent the concrete from freezing on the bucket's wall. But do you imaginer the quantity of fabric needed? Also the workers line is so long and tight that if some emergencies(biological necessity) occurs is a show stopper. Also the line is prone for accidents. Also the lens use is ridiculous not even a comment needed. Although the concrete theory is acceptable. Good animation and good choice for music though.
Not only that, it's well known that the Copts were the original Egyptians, and at least some have fair skin and blue or grey eyes to this day, like the scribe in the Egyptian museum. The obsession with race really spoiled it for me. Like you say we need more proof of the interesting poured vs cut, but when I started seeing pictures of giant magnifying lenses it started to get absurd and may as well have been aliens who brought the technology at that point. Still fascinating and thought provoking.
i have just recently visited the Great Pyramid of Giza and watched this amazing documentary and can quite honestly say that this completely answers the questions you have on how they were constructed but more importantly tells us that we need to be using solar power in more dramatic ways to reduce our energy consumption its so so simple thank you Fehmi, will be sure sure to share this documentary
I don't understand! in what way would it reduce the overall energy consumption? or did you mean something different and simply articulated it incorrectly?
@@cepheus7391 . Overall ? Who mentioned that besides you ? Do you think maybe its about fossil fuel consumption reducuction, not overall energy usage reduction ? Right ?
@Unkl_Bob @Unkl_Bob does it say reduce fossil consumption, or does it say reduce energy consumption? I can't tell you what they meant that is why I asked. I didn't need to say overall as it is bound to the statistic. I can't reduce human water consumption without it reducing the consumption of water overall. I cant recude the amount of air we breath without it reducing the consumed oxygen overall. Maybe they did mean fossils, which is why I made an assumption that maybe it was just articulated incorrectly.
The pharaoh asked Haman, his deputy and partner, to build a huge monument to prove to the people that God does not exist. Here Pharaoh resorted to the technique used at that time in construction which was lighting fire on stones in order to pour the needed stones for the monument. The Pharaoh said after that: “So kindle for me (a fire), O Hâmân, to bake (bricks out of) clay, and set up for me a Sarh (a lofty tower, or palace) in order that I may look at (or look for) the Ilâh (God) of Mûsâ (Moses); and verily, I think that he [Mûsâ (Moses)] is one of the liars."( AlQassas : 38).
Uhmz well maybe Thoth came from thought? thinking?| one could describe the emergence of a thought to be born out of nothing and therefor everything, out of our universe,in our head, a sign from god, from the stars out of nothing. Then off course years later this is interpreted as a alien entity. Makes sence to me anywayz
Question. How could the wood forms hold together? They apparently had no nails or screws to hold such Hugh and heavy forms. The amount of pressure exerted to the side of the pouring forms would break apart the form if not held rigidly. Poured material always takes the texture of the form used. Do the blocks have wooden texture on the sides?
Hi Ricardo, I have not watched this, so I am not 100% sure of the context. But as to your question about no nails or screws fasteners: carpentry of antiquity did not use such fasteners. Carpentry of old used a variety of techniques like mortise and tenon, wood pegs, tongue and groove, knapp joint. Look up "ancient joinery" to see some amazing techniques. Peace.
@@gregkirschke5559 If that was the case. Then after a several pours the joints where the boards and the pegs meet would be more noticeable as the wood would swell with water absorption and pegs would be very difficult to extract. The texture of wood would be even more noticeable. If togue and groove or Knapp joints were used the forms would be impossible to take apart as the heat of the environment would dry the mixture between then and would actually crack.
@@pinview8519 Here are some facts about wood that you may research: Combustion temp. 233 degrees C / 451 degrees f, ignition temp 180 degrees C/ 356 degrees f, smoke temp 149 degrees c. /300 degrees f.
So if melting granite will make some type of obsidian, how did they melt granite and make it granite again? Also, how do you explain the saw marks located around the pyramids?
Wow! This just pulled together the centimeter, Water droplets, magnifying glass, Egypt, Peru, free masons, knights templar, metric system, philosopher stone, cement, sacred architecture, pi, the golden ratio, and racism!
I don't understand the rule about the size of droplets... different quantities of water will produce different sizes of droplets? Won't they? How is it possible to always produce 1cm shapes if the amount of water used is not fixed?
@@j.m.w.5064 I guess you're not understanding what a "droplet" of water means. It's the smallest size a droplet of water can be sure to surface tension. Not a vague "drop" of water
@@The_Paddle_Smith Yes, I really don't know. It's a real question and not covered criticism. I just couldn't follow the explanation. ...when I look at my kitchen sink, I see shapes smaller and larger - so under what circumstances do they form 1cm? Cheers.
They said in the video they cut it like that so they knew how much they needed. Just look at the marks on it if you cant tell that was done with a big magnifying glass then you never played with a magnifying glass. They wanted to keep it a secret as well and its fooling you over 4000years later
@@daverhin5975 yes sure and I suppose that explains the 2000 ton blocks in the Temple of Jupiter at Balbek and the one still in the quarry. How do a fool like you explain that?
@@tyrrellharvey this video just made this documentary real to me. Thank you!!! If only everyone in the comments could see what a small lenses can do to metals.
its aboluty concrete especially the majority lab results and time dont lie they did not cut those stoned they were poured and the sphinx was not Egyptian assyrians get credit
@@davidleomorley889 okay, I'm all about learning and this documentary has been by far the most convincing. So I'll be among your first viewers if you do. Just holla
@@davidleomorley889 i just cant buy the fact that granite was cut to ezacting tolerances like you said no technology the time it would have taken is mind boggling so humans come out of stone age and do that no way it explains why the wood is embedded and time this theroy alse shows time being 10 -20 yrs and allows for precise measures
@@davidleomorley889 whatever i have read and researched myself weren’t enough to convince me till date but i really appreciate the information you provided. I’ll go through each and every one of the link you provided. Appreciate it
I liked the film, but the question remains: how is it that you can't slip a piece of writing paper between the stones? Plus you would find it hard, if not impossible, to remove the moulds from between the stones without causing damage to them, as you 'd have to knock them out. I've cast concrete.
@@wraith6766 Even if the block dries completely, if you make it with similar materials it will look and act as a solid block and will stick together. Pyramids today are torn up so you can see each individual block. You can see an example of poured concrete added onto dry concrete in the shafts how they form together as one even if misaligned slightly. They would have had to have a staging ground to make and dry block and transport it to the spot.
@@dambigfoot6844 I've never worked with this medium so this is just speculation, but I wonder if this mixture behaves differently than concrete. I wondered as well why they would cast individual blocks instead of larger pieces to minimize effort
I am completely bedazzled by this epic documentary - I've visited the Great Pyramid when I was young, and felt the shear power of the Massive Chamber with the sarcophagus/graphite basin in it. I felt something very true and powerful that day. I must admit, my theory was more focused on the resonance side of things, being that Graphite in terms of acoustic reflections is ideal for maximum reverberation. I always felt that chamber was like a hospital surgeory room, using resonance/voice & harmony to heal an inviduals body of diseases and infections, due to the material of the walls, it was able to effectively create feedback as the sound had no where to go other than back on itself.. using sacred geometry to position the voices around the body for the full effect to be reached. or so that was my theory..
@@tampauser6879 I was 13 years old when I went... and not all of it hit me then, only the raw power of the resonance in the chamber, sooo pure.. I then went onto persue my career in music even further, eventually going on to study a masters in audio engineering.. Whcih is why I thought my theory was so strong.
Finding the harmonic resonance of something allows you to do amazing things. Tesla was able to destroy a building with a hammer, and he also blew out a few power distribution stations when his experiments hit the resonance point of the circuit. If you have a round pool, it's pretty easy to generate three-foot waves in a 15-foot pool with a period of one second.(my kids love it!). A far as healing, however... our bodies are *way* to complicated for that. We are not guitar strings. As far as pyramid power is concerned, Mythbusters busted it fairly convincingly. Then again, they did not repeat the experiment with 7.75 million tons of stone...
does not address much ... just another brain fART by yet another human working things out trying to merge brain fARTS with heART work and the Sacred ARTS
I agree it does fall short in so many ways. It's quite clear that the ancients used the concrete method but they also used other more advanced methods. I don't think the gigantic solar lens is something that would melt that stone in those quantities, maybe for smaller things but not for those super large stones. And the super hard bowls have no characteristics of ever being melted. The colors are not mixed and granite looks like it was a ground up material instead of melted. So this isn't a great example, too many questions.
Oh I know. I dont even use the word "history" unless it applies to a written or spoken narrative. I use our past or the past. History is written by the victorious so it's in fact his story; not mine or ours at all.
@@dwarvenerd9397 When you melt granite using lens you change it's structure, so you end up with obsidian..... Also, lens of size shown in a film... Not a chance
Watched this several times and each time it blows my mind. Thankyou so much for this film.
Granite can only form under pressure, otherwise all you get is obsidian. The makers of this movie know this and are lying for views. Shame on them for spreading lies and deceit.
G'damn you have a lot of time
Get a job
The hardest rock on earth is a closed mind.
which is strengthend by fact
There's so much truth in that statement it's scary. People wonder why I have no faith in humanity.
There are a lot in the comments section too .
Give them fiction people accept it but give them facts with proofs and no logical alternatives they reject it.
Idiots are everywhere
Not to mention the very recent carbon dating of the cedar rod fragments prove khufu didn't have it built those shafts were sealed 300-500 yrs b4 he was born, which also throws this doc's work crews post construction of largest pyramid
@@JasonRatcliff7896 whatever be it people still will accept fiction rather than facts
Like pulling blocks and cutting granite with copper tools
This is by far the most detailed explanation and demonstration of how the pyramids were built and it’s also by far the most detailed accurate work on any ancient history ever. Thank you team for this masterpiece. It should be adopted by universities for history lessons.
It’s a psyop.
It's also more sensible than "the aliens did it"
@@kylemaducdoc The notion of "aliens did it" shouldn't necessarily mean literal aliens. It literally means "We don't know how the heck they - whoever they are - did it. We can't accept the idea of extraordinaire, so we decided to go for the bigger ridicule - extraterrestrials". It may or may not be aliens, which is immaterial. Even if it was aliens, having contact with them and employing their support is another feat by itself. That's why I don't take that argument literally, as it is irrelevant. In all variants, mankind was involved. How? That's what we need to find out.
@@focumQuarium fair point
The pyramid was built by Slaves with some rope I know this is true because it was in my 3rd grade history book
Excelente, el mejor documental que he visto en mi vida basado en historia del mundo y la creación de las grandes ciudades, saludo desde mi tierra.....la gran Tenochtitlan.
Granite is generated from magma, underground so it cools slowly enough that three types of minerals form; they are quartz, feldspar and mica. The migration of the ions and the crystallization into these three specific minerals requires a LOT of time. The slower the cooling, the larger the crystals. I have seen granite in the Mojave Desert north of Scottsdale, AZ that cooled very slowly, miles underground. The individual crystalline components were up to 4 inches on a side! The premise that granite could be melted and quickly cooled, regenerating granite is ludicrous! This quick melt-and-cool process would produce lava, or perhaps amorphous obsidion glass, but certainly not granite. The objects and buildings made of granite are truly awe-inspiring and created by processes not duplicated today, but the melting-cooling hypothesis needs to be abandoned. I have melted basalt with a 12-inch Fresnel Lens and generated obsidion glass beads on the surface of the rock.
more low IQ a documentary is today, more likes he has. what about solar lens hypothesis on andesite? it seems tremendous to do, but possible. but on granite, anyway, there is a problem, pression...and the guy never asks himself about how to do molds...with an electric saw, and a good pair of eyes. lol. the documentary with Jacques Grimault was hundred times better. even if still far from perfect at many levels.
Thank you for the inclusion.
I think that you are missing the point, Lon.
This 'movie' is nothing more than a 'suggestion of how the Pyramids' might have been built.
There are dozens more, just like it!!!
@@johnsonhunglo1993 I like the insights into the possibility of poured geopolymer for the limestone blocks. That answers a lot of questions concerning the massive "blocks" that had to be lifted in every stage of construction. The white and brown limestone placement in the interior and casing is also well portrayed. I commented on the melting of granite and pouring it back into granite that was too implausible for me to overlook.
@@johnsonhunglo1993 it might be a suggestion, but they state it many times that this is how it has been done....
Thoroughly entertaining movie, thank you. Whilst possible, I have 2 questions....
1. When you "melt" granite and cool it, you don't get granite, you instead get gneiss. To reconstitute the original granite, you would have to duplicate the exact pressure, temperature and cooling duration. Failing which, it will not match the parent rock. Also, what formwork would withstand the temperature of molten rock and remain so dimensionally precise?
2. Whilst grinding parent limestone and sandstone rock and combining it into a "concrete" is indeed feasible, the grinding process would obliterate the fossil remains of the original rock, as it is sedimentary and contains many fossilized sea creatures etc. The newly cast "concrete" would then be homogeneous and free of fossils, along with having a different crystal structure upon solidifying. Weren't fossils found in the stones upon testing their makeup? Also a point of interest, the formwork required for casting such huge blocks would have to withstand massive hydrostatic pressure from the wet "concrete", so what did they use to retain such dimensional accuracy in the final product?
It is a thought provoking concept though, I am not denying that.
In any case, it is more logical to think that the stones were molded. Because cutting them with such precision is literally impossible.
It's not about thinking anymore
I just not logical
Lens getting to 1000's degrees temperature to melt
Well building the lens like that is a huge challenge by itself
This is just theory as many others
Molds are always the same , no blocks are the same width
@@lucaspodolsky8979 well no. It is not literally impossible. It's not literally anything. It is feasible though improbable, with what we know and understand at present. Logic is only applicable to the standards and knowledge available, it doesn't take into account future knowledge. It was illogical in the 1600's to imagine flight, but today that logic is revised to incorporate new knowledge.
It not even about logic
Think about it
What they use to withhold over a 1000 degree material to melt ,what kind of mold will stand up to this temperature-pressure few thousand years ago - Cooper??? Ups Cooper melts at arund 1900 F but how you create or rather weld the side
Than on the top it is so precise
I've seen hundreds of pour-in foundation - 'Masons these days use very heavy steel forms to make sure walls retain shape .
These blocks do not weigh 100 or 200 pounds or 300-400 kilos
Wooden molds ??? Not absorbing moisture???? - keeping perfect shape after repeat use ???? Different widths - each block has a different size width wise - how you have visible joints - at least 2 sides .When u pour concrete, it becomes one mass
These blocks have 6 sides - forget about 5, but have you separate the 4th bottom side from each block - pour in the mold- let it dry and slide it ??It is not crazy glue which dries almost instantly,
They had chemicals that speed up the process ?????
Each block is very - CAN NOT BE POUR ON THE TOP OF THE BOOTOM ONE DIRECTLY WITHOUT SEPERATION OTHERWISE WILLPERMAMENTLY ATTECHED TO THE BOTTOM ONE
There is around 2.3 million blocks in 1 pyramid .....
By the way
For centuries, we have been moving forward very-very slowly-except Leonardo...
If Egyptian had that advanced technology, let's say 5000 years ago and using Cooper, somewhere on the way to the present, we've lost plenty of everything
I've been watching documentaries so long now that Hollywood movies are actually boring to me... This is the The Absalute Best #1 Documentary I've ever seen! I must have gone back 20 different times to make sure I understood all the ideas... Definitely the best explanation!
Yea I'm only in 1 hour right now and My mouth is wide open 😮 this truly is the best I have ever seen.
Fun watch but lots of misinformation. Drops of water are not identical. Granite cannot be melted to reform and get back granite. Many similarily built structures around the world lack ingredients for cement formula, and so on. The truth seems to be much wilder, and I am not talking about aliens here.Ah, yea... If the stones were molded, why are they all in unique shapes? It doesn't make any sense to make a unique mold for millions of stones, instead of one mold per level.
I have watched it twice. I think it's brilliant and very plausible . The lens melting granite idea is brilliant but only having burnt ants as a child with a magnifying glass I'm still in hmmmm mode on that. Sounds better than aliens or a magical lost civilisation. Brilliant doc for a theory and i will watch again
@@boombaaga-cw4om I am the boss I own 2 dispensary's🤣 💚Colorado💚
i watched it 6 times
Thanks!
You are the real MVP!
While making concrete and pouring it into blocks or around forms makes a lot of sense, the giant lenses to melt granite into large forms as in this "documentary" needs several demonstrations for me to give this any consideration. Let's build these lenses, based on the initial suggestion using the materials mentioned early on. Let's then show that these lenses have the ability to melt granite at a sufficiently fast rate that would permit the molten granite to flow into the form and solidify in a solid piece the size suggested in this documentary.
Consider that this giant lens still has one focal point to concentrate the heat onto a spot. How large would that spot be, and would the heat generated be sufficient to keep the molten granite in a pourable condition long enough to fill such large forms. There are some interesting issues being raised, but likewise there are many dubious claims.
The making of concrete and pouring it into forms doesn't make any sense. The blocks of the pyramid are not the same size, they are the same height but the other dimensions are all different. If the concrete form thing were true wouldn't they use the same forms over and over? Also filling the forms up the way that is depicted and allowing the block of concrete to dry enough before removing the forms would take far too long. The giant lens theory to melt granite is akin to the earth being flat and just as ridiculous.
@@bobkozalov8821 i worked with concrete making formwork with timber i think the worker would us different lengths of timber or you would make a block 2 sides then fillin that’s the quickes way to build a wall so build a black4 shutters to fillin 2shutter and so on thats the quickes way just saying
We've already melted granite with fresnel lenses from large flatscreen TVs. I would consider this debunked. It stops being granite after you melt it and doesn't become granite again after cooling.
@@bobkozalov8821 If you only have two sides for the forms, and use neighboring blocks as the other sides while pouring in place, it makes sense that they could be different sizes as you wouldn't be concerned with them looking the same when they aren't going to be seen. Why spend the extra effort to make sure you position the forms in exactly the same spot when it's unnecessary? I think this can be confirmed by the rows being equal width while blocks within the rows are of different lengths. I would need to see them uncovered though, and that's a problem for obvious reasons.
This is typical pseudoscience. The fact that it took several years to film this BS and no one bothered with even a 1/5-1/6 scale experiment is all you really need to know about the quality of "research" presented here. Make a 1m lens with historically accurate tools then melt some granite and pour at least a brick sized block. It would've been worth much more than all your endless amateur looking animated "reconstructions" combined.
On TH-cam > **Fresnel Lens melting GRANITE **
I am a Civil / Construction engineer and I will address my points over few comments:
3- What kind of humans can take the intense heat of melting lava to work near it and under a hell of intense concentrated sunbeam you proposed?
Maybe the animal heads are helmets for suits.
Agree, said the exact same, couldn't conjure a theory, even for thought sake lol.
There could have been walls constructed around the device not shown in the video.
Why authors of that theory won't create vases or status out of melted granite with use of self developed gigantic magnifying glass installed as they have proposed ? They made it looking so easy after all~
@@Tom_Mroz I've seen people melt rocks with a magnifying glass probably 3 feet in diameter and it worked. But ya it wasn't grannet and the didn't melt the rock into a form or anything cool like that. But never the less it was some sort of proof of concept.
I thank you, sir, for making your Film available in the English Language.
yeah they even translated her petulant schoolgirl sigh of ''exasperation'' at the end... i was so covinced!
@@DrBe-zn5fv
READ THE BOOK, THE SECRETS OF BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF EGYPT, which has completely new theories about this subject ( WITHOUT MONEY) on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com, accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Română ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; NO MONEY )
I'm open to hearing new ideas and new arguments. Pragmatic people always cling to the popular proverb, burning those on the "Galileans" who claim that the world isn't flat ,or that the universe revolves around it ; so I prefer to give everyone a chance to present something new; YOU NEVER KNOW ?, (what if one of the 78 novelties proposed in the book on page 57 , is finally accepted ? ). Have a nice day. Thanks for watching!
Hănțulie Ionel.
Surely if you melt granite and pour it into a mould it would become much softer - naturally formed granite takes millions of years to cool down and form if you were to break it's bonds by melting and then you let it cool in a much shorter time, minutes or hours, you will be left with a finished product much softer than the granite you started with. Also would like to see evidence of those lenses to do the melting, I doubt those could have been even thought up in those days and they had no chance of making a flawless magnifying lense with the capabilities you mention - if they did have the thought process to think up those lenses then they would have had telescopes, spectacles, microscopes - ancient Egypt has plenty of precision, but glass was only at the glass bead stage at the time academics date the building of the Giza pyramids.
@@N3m3sis43
READ THE BOOK, THE SECRETS OF BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF EGYPT, which has completely new theories about this subject ( WITHOUT MONEY) on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com, accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Română ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; NO MONEY )
I'm open to hearing new ideas and new arguments. Pragmatic people always cling to the popular proverb, burning those on the "Galileans" who claim that the world isn't flat ,or that the universe revolves around it ; so I prefer to give everyone a chance to present something new; YOU NEVER KNOW ?, (what if one of the 78 novelties proposed in the book on page 57 , is finally accepted ? ). Have a nice day. Thanks for watching!
Hănțulie Ionel.
Q
This is the most realistic theory/study/documentary that I ever watched. At least, they use their common sense, not like those who says , the pyramid were built by aliens. My admiration to the team who made this documentary. Brilliant!
The first time watching youtube for 3 hours straight ... what an interesting journey of life
I know! I can't believe I watched this for over three hours! Very good doc!
This is The Most Amazing and Satisfying movie documentary Ever about Egypt. Thank You !!
Then you’re amazed and satisfied by bullshit and lies. 🤷♂️
I dunno alex, this is much more plausible than what you've been forced fed down your gob hole.
@@kealowilson2816 Interesting. And what do you think I’ve been force fed, exactly?
@@AlexH8280 that wasn't nice. I'm sorry.
Listen, if you think that a hunter gather society barely out of the Stone Age figured out advanced geometry from farming, was able to craft a giant lens (yet no other evidence of glass making from these people) used to melt rock (😂) and figured out the centimeter from water drops (😂😂), filled and set 1 stone every 2.5 seconds, even filled other asymmetrical, wildly shaped and perfectly-fitting stones around Egypt (and elsewhere)...you don’t understand what “plausible” means.
It had some animations that made it *look* plausible, but in reality it is still not. You can’t melt granite - quarried 600 miles away - with a magnifying glass 😂. And that’s what the king’s chamber is made of. No mention of this in the video.
No mention of complete fossils found in eroded and broken stones. Concrete doesn’t have fossils.
It tries to state as fact that the kings chamber is located where it is specifically for religious and ritualistic reasons, completely ignoring that all other pyramids have entirely different layouts.
I invite anyone to watch a walkthrough of The Great Pyramid, watch people to struggle to climb the steep incline of the narrow passages (with stairs added that weren’t there originally), to nearly crawling through the tunnel “entrances” to the so-called Kings/Queen’s chambers, and tell me why you believe these people intentionally built it this way with a funeral precession of their King in mind.
This video begins by stating more plausible explanations (advanced lost civilization, etc) before laying on the bullshit.
i've seen this like 3-5 times now, fascinating, thank you Mr Fehmi Krasniqi
As an antidote to this misleading propoganda, that suggests ancient non- white, people's were not intelligent and needed outside help because they were brown skinned Africans, therefore unable to achieve great architectural feats.
This French film depends on not telling you that the Nile flooded every year during which the Pharaoh hired the tens to hundred of thousands of farmers, who due to the anuual flooding become skilled stone workers after a few years.
It also does not acknowledge, that this annual flooding was the perfect time to ship rock slung between two ships via the Nile with a carved channel that cut through the rock to the Sphinx.
This film also overstates the hardness of the various rocks. Most of the Pyramids are limestone which when quarried from the Giza plateau is soft and easily cut with copper saws.
"Ancient Aliens debunked" answers all of the misleading claims in this French film that says brown-skinned humans were too stupid to build the Pyramids.
I suggest you all search for and watch "Ancient Aliens Debunked". If you value challenging information about ancient civilisations, if you value the concept of our ancestors being intelligent, sophisticated beings who had knowledge that they developed with their own intelligence search for this alternative move.
@@captainsensiblejr. more over they forgot to mention the fossils found in the stone! SGD TH-cam channel has great explanations and experiments on this
@@kmoussi2852 Elaborate, Where can i wAtch it? thanks.
@@mnvia05 TH-cam SGD k2019
This film should be relaunched in cinemas worldwide. It would be good for Fehmi to be compensated. He has worked for us, for humanity. We can also DONATE to him.
Nahhhh our governments love us ignorants!!!!!
You can donate a solar lens, according to this film there should be lots of them scatered around the globe.
Did you donate?
@@AutismusPrime69 I wanted my time here.
One thing about the Pyramids, there's a lot of concrete evidence.
This should be the top reply
The Egyptian pyramids, the Mayan, the Aztec, the Yugoslavian pyramids, the Alaskan pyramids., Did anyone notice how they have strong resemblance to the Meenakshi Temple and other South Asian ( southern India in particular) Temples?
@@saffiyehbrandhijaffer-mcne2800 they look similar however they are completely different in India and Egypt they worship or immortalize the snake and in mesoamerica (amarakapan) they believe in the dragons just like the melanated mongol. They had common knowledge but different idolatry.
Thank you!
very good lol🤣😂😎👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Any geologist will tell you that small crystals in granite, mean that it cooled quickly at the surface, and that large crystals mean that it cooled very slowly (thousands of years slowly) deep underground. Also, I would need to see a demonstration of a giant magnifying glass melting granite at a rate of anything more than a trickle. Also, natural limestone, being sedimentary, would have bedding planes, whereas concrete would not. Are the bedding planes there or not? Also, making form work for the South American walls would be a nightmare because every stone is different and is rounded on the outside. Well done guys for doing all this work, but I am not sure this is the last word. People do carve stone you know.
Well there are bedding planes that can be easily seen with any Google image search. Not only that but the pyramid stones are full of fossilized sea creatures which formed the limestone
Aliens and their technology is the most believable and logical based on recent information.
Megalithic stones were carved and transported all over the ancient world. There are places in the eastern Mediterranean and Egypt where a gigantic stone has been partially excavated, and was not entirely separated from the ground. You can also see chisel marks on the stones. I can't imagine anyone thinking the giant statues were made by pouring liquid into a statue-shaped mold. If they can carve and move giant statues, doing the same thing with rectangular blocks shouldn't be a problem.
@@TheJoineryCo.You're so gullible. Aliens did not build the pyramids. To say that is an insult to the incredible work of the Egyptians.
Watching this for the second time .
Totally blown away by the amount of effort and research that has gone into this!
th-cam.com/video/qoaHWeiiWa8/w-d-xo.html
4th
Same here!
Truth, look up "precision evidence of ancient high technology" video
And yet so simple....I think the reason the Egyptian gov is so hesitant to explore these ideas....it'll make the white man and his lies look weak compared to the black man and his brilliance of that era.
I have been fascinated at the construction of these for a long time. Watched alot of alien theorists say it was built by aliens. But Quran always said pharaohs architect built pyramids. Could never figure out how they moved such huge stones so quickly. And how everything was so precise. Watching this movie makes perfectly logical sense. Thank you for explaining
Ask any good Mason if that's possible the way it is explained in this "movie"
@vincentk.8653 to be honest I don't know much about building and I dont know any masons. But one thing for sure it makes more sense than aliens. Advanced technology make more sense than aliens. So how every they did it is better than hearing aliens cam and built them then left, or aliens created us as slaves or whatever wild theory they pull out of their a$$.
Not possible Khadija & please don't argue 🙏🏼
The Quran was written by a pedophile and is false, the stones were not poured... already debunked...
@@vincentk.8653 The Masons are a secret org.
I had my own tile business and my helpers would always try to learn where to place the first ceramic tiles, like say a 200 sq. ft. Kitchen floor. You have to start exactly precise or if it's off by a 16th of an inch, by the time you get to the other side it grows and it's basically ruined. So theoretically the first stone will dictate the placement of all the stones to come. It's absolutely astonishing that the pyramid is exact considering its size, however it was done, it is the the top of 7 wonders of the world.
You are speaking of absolute vs incremental. It affects machinists as well
thats where the problem started.. inches and feets and yards and miles?? why??
why did some people do things that are allready perfect like the metric system, unnecessary complicated??
@@theninja2381 weren't elles used before the English system?
sorta .. but a tile job is in a dictated space where this was on a blank slate they could start anywhere any orientation any shape I know this because i play with Leggo's
Alien technology would have been the only way to pull off the mathematics of this ( let alone the physical plant build out). According to this documentary, the Egyptians were " apparantly"well on there way to understanding the physics behind nasa launches which is ridiculous.
Whether right or wrong, this film was fascinating and really got me thinking. Excellent job!
Same, the narrator, knowledge, information and outside thinking had me hooked! I hope this channel produces more documentaries like this one
@@volarex4178
lol when it fits your black narrative you give it thumup
@@messianic_scam History is all PC now. It's not about facts, it's about making certain groups happy.
@@gusgrizzel8397
yah in this case the leftist liberal group who made this documentary want to make afrocentric happy by giving them historical favors
@@messianic_scam It's a form of theft. IF they have such a great history of invention and discovery, why steal from others?
the most interesting thought provoking film i've watched recently
there is no evidence of any lens, and when you melt granite, it dosen't stay as granite, it becomes a crystalize glass
@@XboxSpartan05
Glass is made of sand.
This is a better docu of the pyramids
th-cam.com/video/2fS9ixfQ_no/w-d-xo.html
For sure but just another speculation with many leaps of faith.
I met a very intelligent and woke black man while on a trip to China. He just played this documentary the moment I told him I love watching documentaries. It's now 4:20 am, we just finished watching this MASTERPIECE, and Oh My God, it's a gem. Shout out to the entire team for creating such an informed piece. To my 🇨🇲 gentleman, thank you for understanding my love language ❤
Ps, I'll be sharing with all my people back in Kenya 🇰🇪🇰🇪
Among thousands of documentary films I watched, this magnificent one is the best ever with no competition.ive literally enjoyed every minute to the max...thank you all.
The best explanation Possible...
Truth, look up "precision evidence of ancient high technology" video
Truth, look up "precision evidence of ancient high technology" video
Hoe mush he paid Jew for that cement my frind? soz my frirnds England is no first langige
@@BrandonSmith-mu7zm translate to any language
Interesting. The voice over lady was lovely, right down to the big sigh at the end.
Ooh lala ooh lala
...listens to all of the video waiting to hear the sigh.
AfterUpon watching this, All the theory of egyptians carry large stones from far away to build the pyramid just shows we think more primitively than the ancient egyptians. this video make sense
Mostly makes sense except all these sites have quarries and most have stones that were left on the road side. Easter Island and Peru. Baalbak has two stones in the quarry so why say the base was concrete?
@@Eugensdiet Copying or repairs done after the knowledge was gone
@jb 123 I completely agree
I totally agree with you 100 perecnt this ia the only theory that makes sense,now someone shuld demonstrate an experiment about melting granit ,i believe that they used that technology because no way carry such weight hundreds tons of tona of granite in one piece ,also there are evidents on the Giza plateau of melted granit and inside the pyramids itself
Why buildings exist like The Valley of the Kings digging deep like creacy, Abu Simbel build directly out of the rock, the Tempel of Karnak and Luxor? All this pleaces defenetly build in or from rocks. They would not do this if they had some kind of concrete and this buildings proof that they where able to work with stone and transport it.
This might be one of the most beautiful films i ever seen in my life. Thank you for the effort to rise a better future for humanity. From northeast of Brazil, here is another voice of the choir, till it's heard and settled into the hearts around the world.
inaccurate though
Yeah melt granite it turns to black obsidian.... proven you can't melt granite and it return and look like it's original form this is a fact
Não faz a gente passar vergonha amigão... tira o nome do Brazil desse comentário vai...
If the Egyptians had developed massive magnifying glasses, they certainly would have developed smaller versions for home fire starting and even eyeglasses. Let's not overlook plain windows as well.
One other thing to ponder: Glass does not deteriorate and there would be many examples of this being found if it was used for thousands of years.
Maybe they had matches 😕
Maybe they did have smaller versions? No current discoveries of even the larger versions.
So cant rule out the smaller versions just because they are hidden away or unearthed.
Either way, since the tools for machining are seemingly non-existent, except in the forensics of the stone itself (cut marks, drill marks, etc), possibly a more modern cover up?
@@dematidesigns5444 That's very true but it's not my responsibility to to prove something didn't exist as it's impossible to prove a negative. It's the author's responsibility to prove it's existence or at least show evidence of it's existence especially when his whole melting granite theory is dependent on the existence of these optical technologies.
@@dematidesigns5444 you are correct that no machining tools have been found. But you are also correct that there is abundant evidence of their existence, unlike the granite melting lenses in this video.
Ultimate generational souvenir. The meter, golden ratio, pie 3.14, mathematics, astronomy, royal constant, and chemistry all in one. This is so incredible and amazing!
Truth, look up "precision evidence of ancient high technology" video
I thought that the diorite ball and the copper tool were the souvenirs here...This documentary is BS. "Hey, let's build a pyramid with lenses and concrete then leave a diorite ball and a copper thing as a souvenir", lol.
I've done form work & I can't fathom how the outside sloping blocks were poured, form work exerts a hell of a lot of pressure. Most of my time was spent shoring up, or preventing the actual "box" shape, slab or whatever shape was required from; lifting, moving, or splitting. Now I never stayed in that job to become a master carpenter, or even really skilled, but pegging down a form on a 45` slope with no anchor for the outside portion/face must have been damn near impossible. I won't say it couldn't be done, just that I can't imagine how it could be done, the idea of a concrete mix is not as mad as some might imagine, but my wife (went to Egypt) said there are very small fossils in many of the blocks and the process of making a polymer "rock" would surely destroy those.
Never say never... I'm always open to learning something new, even if I'm proved wrong about anything. We should always remain open to new theories. Excellent video, thank you.
@James Stewart I've only limited knowledge about any of the seemingly miraculous buildings and building techniques these people used, sometimes I enjoy listening to theories people have these days, even the far out crazy ones. I can't put anyone down unless I have proof, or superior knowledge on a given topic, still, some of these ideas force you to think "outside the box" and that in itself can bring about new knowledge.
I love these videos (even if they are crazy) in the same way I loved Star-trek as a kid, they're entertaining and harmless as long as you realise they are just "entertainment" and given the state of the world outside we could all do with taking a step back, pausing for breath and taking a moment to enjoy life.. with all the craziness in it too.
Thanks for commenting, I hope you & all yours are safe and well, best wishes from a simple man trying to make sense of it all.
@Phishy Phil I think it would be appropriate more so than build, in that case. Kind of like the replacement and appropriation that's going on today.
Not 45 but ~53 degree slope
You’d need one hell of a slump test ah bro
Fossils are found in sedimentary rocks..
El mejor documental con fundamentos reales, fascinada con tanto conocimiento,la ciencia y las pruebas hablan por si solas. Gracias por este maravilloso trabajo.
This is an amazing documentary! As a retired builder I would like to ask how it's possible to pour molten granite into wooden forms, without them igniting instantly. I also don't see how its possible to slide a wood form off of fresh concrete .They have to be broken apart or pried away from the pour, and it can't be before it's completely cured. In order for blocks to be perfectly flat, the form wood has to be very thick or braced. Other than that I found this fascinating!! P.S. This is THE most interesting video on TH-cam if you're into history!
Maybe they used the method of old metal casters by making the mold from red clay?and as the for the forms according to how they were made they could have tampered a dryer mixture similarly to a shower pan for tile showers? Accelerator for drying? Just ?s
@@blindandok1415 Could be, obviously much of history has changed from what I was taught in the 50s & 60s. just the stuff they are finding in South America in the last 15 yrs. is astounding. Actually all over the world! It's changed my opinion on a lot of things.
@@seadog915 I appreciate your response.i agree the world is a bigger mystery than we may want to admit.there are others maybe we could share some video titles. I know of plenty.thanks george.truth is mandatory.but not so easily discovered.
@@blindandok1415 I was mostly referring to all of the cities and ruins they have found since the LIDAR tech. I watched one just recently where they found an entire city, hidden in the jungle!
@@seadog915 yes.i have also seen.but that is at the most softer of discoveries.the discovery of earth's hidden history is interesting but it's what is ahead thats unknown that is most interesting.most interesting times.
The only thing I find improbable is melting granite. Melting it is one thing, but creating the energy required to keep it molten long enough to cast is something quite different.
But possible...
And way easier than carry a 50t block for about 800km. :)
@@HotjeKvovg Nope. NOT possible. Also ... idiotic to propose, when moving a 50 granite block is MUCH easier and we KNOW FOR A FACT that's what happened. Do you idiots ever bother to read books - and find out what we ACTUALLY know about the Ancient Egyptians - or do you just rely on TH-cam videos for your "research"?
@@HotjeKvovg Not sure that possible
I'm working on ways to do this... not melting per say, but rather softening through sets of high frequency, localized vibrations. You don't need to melt a whole block if you can just make the part you're cutting into a putty.
I'm in the hypothetical stage, and honestly, I have problems already.... Sound waves get LONGER in a dense material, because the sound travels FASTER through it. So, we would have to start out with sound waves too high frequency to produce through speakers.
Perhaps they got vibrations to occur in dense materials first, somehow, maybe via chemistry, or electricity (piezoelectric effect).
I'm thinking cymatics were used to transport the blocks if they were not formed and created.
@@growthisfreedomunitedearth7584 They had electricity and hifi (I've heard of the Bagdad batteries) to transform rock? That's no more than speculation of almost cosmic proportion. Copper saws, sand and water could be used to cut the stone. Splitting techniques, chiseling, drilling holes, it can all be done. Dig ditches, use the Nile and have stones drifted on rafts or sailed on boats close to the pyramids. So why UFOs, Annunaki, lasers, plasma cutters and the whole fantasy factory 'that Science always tries to hide'?
This makes alot of sense. Only one question. Has anyone bothered to actually try to melt any type of stone with a giant magnifying glass? The whole thing hinges on a central untested hypothesis and yet still makes more sense than anything I've seen put out on this before.
Yes! Has anyone melted stone yet on this large scale... Let's do it!
I wondered the same thing, but the basis of the theory still holds up, whether it was melted by a lens or some other means. There is another video on YT melting granite using radio waves. John Keely proved it could be done using music, or vibrations of a specific frequency. Given that light is on the same musical scale at a higher octave than sound, it's possible it had more to do with generating a specific wavelength than the heat generated by focusing sunlight. Just a thought :)
Might also have been chemicals, rather than glass.
We have chemicals today that can create intense heat. Also there are signs of stone being "soften" several places in the world.
Perhaps they where masters of chemicals for stone production after thousand of years of development.
yes Micheal Tillinger found out they used to melt granite in South Africa or what is now S,A check out some of his video's You will find out how they used to and still do it
I can't find a single credible example of granite being melted back into Granite of the same consistency it was. It always turns to obsidian or glass and not back to the origional colors or form in general. The pink granite in the Great Pyramid which is supposed to come from Aswan looks exactly as if it did come from Aswan, so they would have had to have melted it down and when it cooled it remained looking identical. At this point that would be an unknown heating process because other methods won't give you that result via sunlight or fire. I want to believe this and I will continue searching for the answers
This is the best documentary I have ever seen. I watched it probably 7-8 times
Heat melting of sandstone, granit, diorite etc. results not in sandstone, granit, diorite etc. of different shapes, but in glass or glass like stone that does not look at all like the original stone.
Granit was not made in laboratory yet. Not a piece. Robert Gentry ... polonius halos in granit. I was wondering how they could melt granit with solar energy and create the same granit again. Magic
@Jeshua Satterlee i have overbaked ceramic and got churchlike statues- some white porous rock.
it´s a combination of natural elements mixed and fermented with the rocks and the sun heatin it to the point that it could be molded as some sort of rock jello cake.. :)
@Edwin Jansen actually there are various rooms and undergroud caves along with halls that have the right acoustics, i also believe they had already mastered how to use water and electricity for more detailed matters, so who knows how many more amazin ruins have been kept without rcords or solid proof. :)
@@ricbrano6402 Bingo!
Amazing documentary, without a doubt the best one i’ve seen.
uno de los mejores documentales y la teoria mas logica que he escuchado sobre las muchas estructuras que hay en muchos lugares de la tierra. GRACIAS por este documental.
El mejor documental en mi vida
Respect and kudos to Fehmi Krasniqi. He deserves worldwide recognition for his insights into the forgotten history of mankind.
Thank you for having this translated to English. ❤
@@Pomorchik cut and paste. Man your creepy
Absolutely STUNNING,watched from start to finish and hardly moved a muscle. No words can describe the sheer beauty of this documentary.
Now watch K2019 Debunked
You're welcome
th-cam.com/video/KMAtkjy_YK4/w-d-xo.html
You actually believed they could pour granite? WOW
It's amazing. I love especially how the documentary thoroughly explain how the ancient egyptians discovered the basis of the sciences today. It is such a rich history, and so astounding beautiful to learn how they learned from nature, and observation.
This is the best doucumentary i've ever seen. Thank you
mockumentary
You need to get out more dude because this documentary is a farce
@@kimfowler6612 Would you like to share your workings?
They could have been made of clay. Clay can take high temperatures. It was used in the space shuttle's nose to withstand reentry from space.
@@kimfowler6612
READ THE BOOK, THE SECRETS OF BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF EGYPT, which has completely new theories about this subject ( WITHOUT MONEY) on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com, accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Română ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; NO MONEY )
I'm open to hearing new ideas and new arguments. Pragmatic people always cling to the popular proverb, burning those on the "Galileans" who claim that the world isn't flat ,or that the universe revolves around it ; so I prefer to give everyone a chance to present something new; YOU NEVER KNOW ?, (what if one of the 78 novelties proposed in the book on page 57 , is finally accepted ? ). Have a nice day. Thanks for watching!
Hănțulie Ionel.
Thanks!
The best documentary i have ever seen, well done.
The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off.
I worry about when a population becomes distracted by trivia, people who put junk culture on a pedestal when its a tool to distract for the people. Meanwhile, the face of our planet, the biosphere, is being sharply changed by man, destroyed by "psychopaths" corporations, people die every day and the world goes on like nothing happened.
The perfect dictatorship would have the appearance of democracy, a prison without walls in which the prisoners would not dream of escape. A system of slavery where, through consumption (Apple, Rolex, Nike, Johnnie Walker, Armani, Ferrari, Louis Vuitton...) and entertainment (Marvel, Disney, NFL, Star Wars, Adele, NBA, Pokemon GO, Game of Thrones, UEFA...), slaves would love their servitude (producing dictatorship without tears, a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies).
That system is our enemy. It is all around us. It is the world, the wool, that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth (a prison that you cannot taste or see or touch, a prison for your mind). This system organizes our economy, our politics, our habits, our lives, and even provides us with rates and credit cards and gives us the appearance of happiness. And this seems to be the final revolution.
You've felt it your entire life, that there's something wrong with the world, but accepted as normal (wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it). Like everyone else you were born into bondage. It seems that we have been born only to consume and to consume, and when we can no longer consume, we have a feeling of frustration, and we suffer from poverty, and we are auto-marginalized. And many are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.That's how it is with people - nobody cares how it works as long as it works. I only hope we understand that reason before it's too late. Fact is that when we are mesmerized by someone (corporations) we lose all sense of analysis and reflection. It is important to realise that everyone is born with a brain, so I'm being pragmatic by saying no one has the right to be ignorant.
Its not a good documentary... it has plenty of mistakes
@@wiolantsungazer7665 well said
@@nixxxon18 example mr Nixxxon. With certifiable proof of course
@@thedangerous1 for example they implied the pyramid was composed only of precision cut stones which is rubbish. Also they implied most of those came from far away which is also rubbish, Giza plateau was the quarry for the vast majority of the pyramids construction material
When you melt granite it turns into black brittle glass. The quartz fuses with the feldspar - so once it cools, you have a black glob like what you see on the islands of Hawaii. The natural granite coarse crystalline structure is gone. Naturally formed granite is igneous rock which is formed over time by not only heat, but massive pressure, moisture and gasses. Different process.
We are still missing something for sure.
Thank you. They may have poured the sandstone concrete but the Granite was not.
You are correct. Although the result is different when heating at 2500 plus degrees Fahrenheit
@@jorgeduenas428 Oh. What happens during the process at 2,500°?
My question is, have the items been studied to verify tool markings and the "casting" theory suggested in this video? If not, then why?
This is a lot better than watching this in 135,000 parts on tik tok
Right and they did it perfectly after the 30,000 episode it gives you the link lol played perfectly lol
Lol, tick tok an app for morons and communists.
LMAOOOO I DID THIS
Lol that's how I also found this video
@@jbfrodsham that's not tired ppl have learn a lot from tiktok maybe what u watch on their r stupid ppl but from I watch tiktok has a lot on there u can learn from or just enjoy good content
Absolutely amazing how this was detailed out,calculated, best documentary of the pyramids I've ever seen, we owe so much to their ancient knowledge
Interesting, let's try to make the solar lens and see if limestone or granite concrete can be made.
I want to
Hey the granite was melted with the lenses so that is possible since it utilises solar power but the concrete is mixed so that require different materials but have a go but it will cost you 😋
When you melt Granite, it reduces the component parts to a basalt like mixture, you cannot melt granite and have it re-harden into granite. This process takes geological time and a slow cooling under pressure to get the crystals to form. I like the originality of this theory but it cannot be replicated in the real world.
See here th-cam.com/video/I3pCs7jwK7I/w-d-xo.html
They did check out he's TH-cam channel but it in french
th-cam.com/video/svAPyyUJUCo/w-d-xo.html
Wow what an hours of few knowledge and truth? Thanks to all the people involved in creating this masterpiece. Peace,love and humanity.
you believed pouring granite? omg.
Lol you got that right VERY MUCH "few knowledge and truth" , i think you accidently got that right 😅
(As in there wasn't much "truth and knowledge" at all . You know what youtube is like for idiots misinterpreting stuff, wish i didnt have to type this bit but experience shows i should , every time 😅)
This is the most compelling explanation for the construction..All others fail by comparison!Thank you for this excellent film.
Truth, look up "precision evidence of ancient high technology" video
@@actuallythinking3366 cement isn’t high technology
Did you even watch the video I mentioned? I never said anything about cement.. 🤦♂️🤦♂️ that's alright, remain oblivious to the truth, thats all I'm trying to show you..
You can believe the bs the video you watched contains instead of knowing that precision high tech tools were used in carving the granite statues, pottery and obelisks that we can't even copy with today's technology.. but go ahead and believe they used magnifying glasses to melt stone, totally absurd, especially when you can look up videos of people doing that exact thing and it's plain to see that what this video suggests is ridiculous..
You do realize saying shit like that without even watching the video I mentioned is absolute ignorance..
A true masterpiece as well as a new point in human history. To those that see this with an open mind and open heart...we are truly blessed to have seen this. These days proving the real truth to people is so hard. They dont want to accept it and would rather be a victim to the shallow circumstances of the bias mind. Thank you to all involved in this production. I am forever grateful for your effort to bring the true story of life back to the people of the world. Thank you again with love, peace, and inteligence.
There is truth here... theres also speculation, here... the all-black thing was hilarious. Molten granite.... the person who commented on this was correct.. it's impossible. Still though... much of this happened.. interacial just like Cleopatra. Of course it was interracial.. ultimate way to set rapport with closeminded tribes... send the dude thats their color to do the talking... Egypt, being the only civ, like this, probably had grest relations with the phoenicians... then i could see all this happening
@@teedepefanio5687 conceptually I love that they took it past the known speculations. Factually yes, I was shaking my head. However that doesn't mean I think I know more or less.!!!
You lose me with the “ Negro “ part. Is that for sjws?
@@Oldwhiteguy the building methods seem pretty on point that's my main gratitude for the production...other things I shook my head and said no no no out loud. The old drag the stones theory never checked out with me they were either poured and cast or uh...something.
@@angelsarereal1111 well said;)
The issue I have here with the “melting granite” theory is that there are actual experiments on TH-cam right now of melting granite. It turns to a glass/obsidian type of material. It doesn’t melt and pour back into it’s former state. It looks different
That's interesting, can you post a link? Perhaps there was something added to the granite to change it's chemical structure to prevent it from turning to an obsidian-like state. Do not see how those stones could have been lifted to the height and placement in the pyramid unless they were poured there in place... It's by far the most logical explanation I have heard thus far. Is there a competing theory?
@@rustedlight Do a search for Pierre Houdin. He shows how the Grand Gallery was used for a sled that acted as a counterweight to lift the large granite stones. There are actual scratches in the Grand Gallery caused by the sled riding up and down it. To me, it makes a lot more sense than the theory of casting stones.
@@scotth6814 why isn't those scratches in all pyramids? no sled evidence anywhere else.
I imagine the idea is to mix the components similar to when making mortar, melting it, and pouring it to actually make granite, not to melt and pour already existing blocks, like the "documentary" suggests. Doesn't mean that's any more realistic though.
@@Cerl84 Because only the Great Pyramid had chambers above ground level. It was the roof stones for the Queen's and King's Chambers that were so heavy. The regular pyramid blocks were small by comparison.
This is the best explanation of history and math I have ever seen or heard. More than that, everything makes so much sense. Thank you for sharing this with all of us! I hope that many millions will watch it!!!
We should make a huge magnifying glass this summer and make a few statues!
everything makes sense except the very foundation of the build being a fallacy, as in melting sand or whatever they were melting into lava will never produce granite or anything remotely close to it
It's already been debunked, the stones weren't poured...
Agreed
One of the most tasteful uses of The Benny Hill Theme I've ever seen. Superb documentary, loved it.
It's a bit like when David Childress' every other words are "I believe it's extra terrestrials" which sounds like Kenny Everett "It's all in the best possible taste"... makes me laugh anyway.
Obviously, the perfectly timed use of the Benny Hill song eludes you....and that's hysterical. The irony of punctuating the ridiculous theory with the BH song🤣😂🤣
@@donniethompson8254 Not too bright are you?
You should make a 5 meter lens to demonstrate the simplicity of melting so much rock for us. Then explain why such a lens has never been found? If their use was so common??
You got a valid point there
@@adkstar yeah its a great theory that would explain a lot, but until show someone shows it practicability its just theory.
@@MrSeannicholls stone melting is not new. The ancient temples in south India used this technique, liberally. Check out the stone melting videos by Praveen Mohan.
they are brought to other planets, and used to melt their new planet.
Already done th-cam.com/video/I3pCs7jwK7I/w-d-xo.html
I would be more convinced if a replica lense was constructed so we could witness this molten rock theory in action but, nonetheless, it's a compelling theory
th-cam.com/video/svAPyyUJUCo/w-d-xo.html
hoping for the next episode
Egyptians were NOT black!
th-cam.com/video/olO17P-OYsI/w-d-xo.html
@@jaredm1815 The Pharaohs statute looked like they were made up of many different races , some look black but others not at all , definitely European
John Hutchison would have used 'frequency generation' to melt the stone . Not from heat but from temporarily disassociating the atomic structure with frequency . My assumption is the Great Pyramid was built pre-flood when they had technology far superior to what exists today .
Watching for the 3rd time and loving every minute! Thank you to all who made and partook of this film and research. May we never think we know it all, there is always something to learn.
Learn this.. if you melt granite it turns to black obsidian and will not resemble its original form, like the vases try melting granite and having large quartz structures in it not possible it would be mixed and uniform. As a form of black obsidian
I wanna see a granite block melted with a solar lens
We all do.
Bring it on
@Tom Rose ... we have the knowledge...
Will never happen.
I would like to see a demonstration of the building techniques involved in making a 5 meter diameter lens too...oh and by the way, what was the molten granite's crucible made of?
Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos, pleas fund this solar lens and we are able to proof this French Scientist.
Interesting video with some plausible theorys but the Molton granite theory doesn't address the bore holes found, the disc like cutting marks left on some blocks or the partially cut blocks not to mention no evidence has been found of a "lens".
It's worth investigating. There's a ton of glyphs of Ra that could actually be representing the lens.
Also. If they were trying to hide this info from the initiated there wouldn't be any plain glyph of the technology. Like the pile battery/djed pillar, the dipole antenna/uas scepter, the light bulb, cables, generator, the oscillator, it's all there
Exactly and thank you
@@DaliDessalines that's not really trying to hide it though is it. And running around showing everyone what you can do and with what surely isn't.
I bet you can find one underneath the Vatican, and the bore and the holes and what you call cuts come from the concrete moulds..
It needs a lot of effort to produce a documentary like this, develop the theories and illustrate them in interesting fassion. Good job, thinking out of a box and try to give us an alternative to the common theories. Thanks for your effort. Nice script.
Truth, look up "precision evidence of ancient high technology" video
Watched this doco at least 20 times ... The best yet still trying to wrap my mind around the pyramids everyday
His explanation is plausible but I stand firm in saying aliens build the pyramids
@@waylunnakar pouring granite isn't plausible - basic geology tells you that. Also there is a prime example of an obelisk being cut from the bedrock at Aswan. Why bother if you could just mould it?
you are programmed just press accept and update your mind and you will realise your is a lie and the only truth the one and only GOD whose throne is high above the earth and the heavens.@@waylunnakar
These are all great theories, the best I have heard in regards to ancient Egyptian construction technologies.
In any case, I am a New Yorker, thus by nature a cynic and a skeptic.
I am not sold on the melting of volcanic rocks via parabolic lenses during that epoch (4,000 years ago).
If someone, ANYONE could explain THAT to me, it would be highly appreciated.
I'm guessing New Yorkers (and most other places in the world) must be VERY cynical and skeptical about their leaders response to the kung flu. Meanwhile in Florida common sense prevails and all is well by comparison. I agree with your comment but I'm not too concerned HOW they melted the rock, only that they obviously DID as this theory is so perfect it must be considered fact. If this idea is ridiculed and suppressed then we're right back to current times with the tried and trusted award-winning drug that Joe Rogan, for instance, used to cure himself. The drug that if acknowledged as a remedy would have PREVENTED Big Pharma getting even bigger with their experimental stuff.
only new yorkers love themselves so much.
@@RAFchurchlawford4469 bipolar usa
th-cam.com/video/z0_nuvPKIi8/w-d-xo.html. Or google it for yourself: "solar lenses melting granite."
The ideas presented in the movie are not "theories." They are speculations or at best "hypotheses." Theories require experimentation and multiple confirmation of those experiments and their outcomes. An idea that has become elevated to a "theory" has achieved a very high degree of certainty. Hypotheses are important in that they lead to further investigation, but they should not in themselves, be taken as the final "answer."
Fantastic, I no longer have all these questions in my mind. Thank you for all your hard work in making this incredible video.
What about the theory on how the granite was gormed
It's no good no longer have questions. When questions are gone you should look for new ones.
Take it with a pinch of salt
@@northlondonmasons107 how about a truck load? LoL
The only question I have, is why take all this brilliance and give it up to the world? They never deserved it or us!!
I'm blown away that this video isn't being highlighted, discussed and celebrated all over the world. One of the greatest mysteries of the world has been solved in a detailed manner and I'm just hearing about it because someone sent me a clip on FB
I'm blown away I haven't seen this video in a box set along with "The Earth Is Flat", "Birds Aren't Real", and "The Holocaust Never Happened".
@@drwinstonOboogi What claim or claims do u dispute? Only one im struggling with is his breakdown of the Kemetic measuring system but even that one is hard to dispute. Nearly everything else is plausible
I laugh at my knees. Cant u see it is a propaganda video by the woke guys? It is full of ridiculous fake facts. E.g., pls check out what happens to the granite if you melt it!!
Sometimes, 'I DON'T KNOW' is a perfect answer. If these people know how the pyramid was built, let them build one!!
@@birdofparadise1981 I m happy, if they can melt the granit and pour it into a mold to make a head - which is white or creamy color. Lol.
I can now die a happy man.....:)
This is the best show I have ever seen.
Great Job
Monumental accomplishment.
Highly compelling thoughts.
Together: astounding.
What strikes me the most is the sacred geometry. The meter , Sirius etc.
In another documentary they go deeper into the mathematical data the Pyramid conceals; meter, pi, the speed of light, circumference of the earth.. The Revelations of the Pyramid it is called; th-cam.com/video/2fS9ixfQ_no/w-d-xo.html
@@rituaals9344 -Where is part 2,any links plis?
uuum... there's this thing called post rationalisation..? like when you notice that my bed is hanging off the ceiling and you see that if you look across two of the corners it points to the fridge which you observe has just been opened by the cat, so it must have been a hungry feline that lynched my bed, you conclude, meanwhile Syrius was nowhere to be seen, which was unfortunate for your hypothesis wasnt it but never mind?
@@ahmosethemelanite9325 This is the whole movie I think? 1hour 46 minutes th-cam.com/video/2fS9ixfQ_no/w-d-xo.html
@@rituaals9344 -Thank you
When the narrator Diana Gardner states" It's time for humanity to mature!" She releases a deep sigh. I felt that in my soul!
What! Yes! Like THAT PART!!
@@davidleomorley889 no bodies were ever found in the pyramids
@@davidleomorley889 [Ancient Egyptian] Pyramids were not tombs. There have never been any mummies found in any Egyptian pyramids. Neither are there any ancient Egyptian texts that state why the ancient Egyptians conceived and built their pyramids. Indeed, there are a number of ancient texts that state the pyramids were not used as tombs.
@@davidleomorley889 why is your video right and Egyptologists videos wrong?
@@davidleomorley889 Gobekli Tepe is 11,000 years old, that's a fact, recently found, so how can we be sure that a civilization did not exist before the end of the ice age??, You are taking the side of academics, your view is no more provable than my view.
Unfortunately your hypothesis regarding molten granite falls apart when we look at what actually happens to granite when it's melted. It doesn't look like granite any more.
Some truths and some failures. They have also done DNA analysis on the mummies. They know their lineage
I am suspicious about that large heavy lens tilting up on that light timber frame. Has that process been repeated today, building such a large lens using primitive tools, melting granite rocks and setting the molten granite into moulds?
BTW I really enjoyed this film. Thank you.
It's not molten granite, it's a concrete variety made of limestone, caustic soda and water from the Nile.
Who is they?
@@bennybobbieboogie www.nature.com/news/mummy-dna-unravels-ancient-egyptians-ancestry-1.22069
No matter what you believe...this pyramid is a mind blowing structure
I just love the fact that theories are still coming . I listen to them all.
Yeah but series are like farts most of them stink and you have to listen to them and you can either golf clap or make a frown depending on how good it was but either way I don't need the guy who farted standing up screaming I farted at the top of his lungs
@@aarontighe553 Oh shaddup
@@boopster4033 and you proved my point you don't want to listen to what I said and I don't want to listen to what these guys say... the whole point... They are opinions not fact... Unless you're f****** 6000 years old and were there you don't know for sure so you can postulate all you want but you don't actually know but the people with the most backing can scream their point and Theory from the top of their lungs... But they don't know
@@aarontighe553 Oh I don't disagree. Your fart talk though, took away from your point and sounded ridiculous
@@aarontighe553 You might check out Michel Desmarquet's lecture on TH-cam and The Thiaoouba Prophecy. All chapters, 1-13, are available on TH-cam as well...
1.- How could they build such large magnifying glasses?
2.- Didn't the wood that was used to contain the molten grain burn at 1200-1500º?
3.- Who gave them this level of mathematics and geometry? Were they Neolithic and knew all this? and did they not know the iron and almost neither the wheel? It is very strange and at the same time, improbable.
I get the feeling that we are not prepared to fit the truth because the world would collapse.
The documentary is very well done, but there are many things that don’t fit. Much remains to be investigated.
Between 14000-12000 Years ago the Sahara turned into desert. The People had to leave to their homelands and most of them reached the land of the Nil. They was forced year by year to learn to survive the floods. They learned 7000 Years how to manage the problems. And so they became what we all know the egyptians we all admire for their knowledge in so many things.
That's the age old question in almost anything. Which came first the chicken or the egg. They would have had to have a huge lens out of no where to melt the glass to make a huge lens. This is a question humans will never have an answer for. Aliens using lasers is more plausible.
I'll offer my standard argument against the theories in this film. Let's look at modern times for a moment. In the last 150 years we went from horseback to having rovers on Mars sending data back to Earth. The ancient Egyptians lived in the Nile Valley for thousands of years. If they had the knowledge indicated in this film, what happened to it? Given that the advancement of man is more or less linear, the human race should be much further along than we are if the methods proposed in this film are anywhere close to accurate. So what happened?
@@falconquest2068 They explain that with a cataclysmic event that wiped out a good amount of the world in 2100 BC… Who knows man.
@@Mike-in3cp Yeah, I would agree on that rough timeline. It would be interesting to know how much of an affect it had on the world and its knowledge as well as how much it set things back. This was due to a meteor impact. Still, that's 2100 years BCE so all of that knowledge was lost? Caesar burned Alexandria in 48 BCE so that didn't help either. I would like to better understand the timeline of human knowledge.
In the beginning of the movie the Egyptian obelisks were to big and heavy to be moved by man. Later in the movie the Roman's came down to Egypt and snatched them all up to move to Rome.
yes they had technologies , crane, had built a very large ship to transport them to Rome
LOL of course, liars can never get their facts straight...
They were cut into pieces, shipped in batches and reassembled in Rome 🤦🏻♂️ well documented
@@DumangBarolong where did you see this , in a dream or in alternate reality ??
www.theguardian.com/world/2005/apr/20/italy.ethiopia
After watching this documentary I went back to my maths and geometry! Finaly, there is a logical explanation of one of the mysteries of the past civilizations! Great doc!
Logic like a drop of water is 1cm. As the French say: "vous etes ne de la derriere pluie"
@@MrGino714 it doesn't makes any sense , the size of the drop is determined by the amount of water of the drop, they didn't explain what was the standard drop, you have small drops and big drops it depends , you have to stablish a standard and a system , same as with the concrete I Knew about this when this theory came to light some years ago and it made total sense to me but still there are holes that need to be filled , I would say it's the more plausible but you can't accuse of someone to give dumb explanations and you do the same.
Try and make a drop of water smaller than 1 cm. Let the water accumulate and fall on its own...bet ya can't 😢
This was very interesting and compelling for about the first 2 1/2 hours. And then it went completely off the rails.
Questions for the Director though: if the granite was taken out piece by piece then carried to the site to be melted down formed into shape, why is the great obelisk in the quarry already in its final shape?
How do you explain the tube drill marks in the sarcophagus in the kings chamber? Why would they need to drill into it if they could melt it and shape it
Exactly
They could have known both techniques, cutting stone in place, and pouring the "concrete" to make blocks. Its not inconceivable that they had other techniques considering how smart they were.
Exactly
Try the magnifying glass and see what happens if you just walk off and leave it boring in a spot is dig out the molten marble to see how deep it melted all seems easy to understand to me and only hope with all the info we start seeing ppl build and just show if it does or don't but does seem like only way I can imagine
Check out Praveen Mohan's TH-cam channel! He has found proof for rock melting technology in India and probably elsewhere. Enjoy!
This is one of the most concise documentaries I have seen. Super job, incredible work
It might be concise but it is not all that factual.
@@davidleomorley889 I think that certain folks have these videos made and then thrown on to youtube to gauge the reactions
and gullibility of the viewing public. Perhaps a marketing company testing for upcoming TV ads.
Three and a half hours is not 'concise' it is overkill...
@@davidleomorley889 ---
Right said, or rather - written.
This indeed is one of those documentaries i watched that made me question, when do we know the truth behind the lies of our histories!
Almost everything was invented by egyptian. Everything the west tells are all lies.
The elite knows it all this time..... It's not supposed to be understandeble how it was build 😆 as u see millions thought aliens worked here 😂🤣
Knowing that its all lies is a good start.
Never!!!
The west has written history to suit the colonial empire building. But I think that in collaboration the world can change that to get the truth out to everyone
Finally!!! A theory of how the pyramids were built that actually makes sense! Joseph Davidovits should be credited for his work.
The cement seems feasible, but melting granite? Those temperatures would require special suits, eye protection, and the melted granite would not have a grain as seen in statues it would be a blob of glass.
In 3.5 hours they spend zero time explaining their maigical solar lenses..
really solar lens ,rubbish requires 4000deg c to liqify rock even cement would just be warm
You can melt granite, it becomes obsidian. You could try to pour it into molds but without some serious heavy machinery it will not create anything like a large stone, and it will crack as it dries, and it won’t be strong.
But, again, if you melt granite, it will no longer be granite, which is only created deep inside the earths crust. You will be left is obsidian, like glass.
@@ericpalmer3588 Exatamente !
@@ericpalmer3588 is there something that you can melt and mix with something else to make granite?
"The stone that the builder refuse Will always be the head cornerstone."
Best comment! 🥇
AMEN!!!!
Dam bro that’s powerful 💯🔥
RIP Bob Marley
@GERGES ATREES Ⲛⲓⲣⲉⲙⲭⲏⲙⲓ and remember the Hebrew, Moses, who blended right in with them at the palace.
Nobody could tell that he wasn’t Egyptian.
I think you will find the catastrophe that happened was the Younger Dryas impact and the sphinx is in the time of Leo and in general, the civilization is a lot older than said here.
AGREE!!!!!
@@gxhcsmhvc what the hell is that got to do with an event of 12000 years ago or the recognition of the great year of Leo???
Have your jab and go back to sleep!
Agreed. All of the geological, archaeological and anthropological evidence supports the period 12,800 - 11,600 years ago as the time of the Earth Catastrophe. Did you notice the movie briefly showed Immanuel Velikovsky when describing the catastrophe around 2100 BC? Velikovsky's theory is that Venus was birthed from Jupiter in Biblical times and as Venus was drawn toward the Sun it passed very close to Earth causing gravitational effects (like lifting the water of the Red Sea) and electrical, magnetic and other effects like raining hydrocarbons (manna from heaven and oil in the Middle East). Velikovsky presents mechanisms - based on Jupiter birthing Venus about 4000 years ago - to show how events in the Hebrew Bible could be "true." While Velikovsky makes a compelling case and interesting reading his theory has been pretty thoroughly debunked. So why would the authors of this movie include Velikovsky to suggest the Earth Catastrophe happened during recent times and the Egyptians are the "pre-Flood" technologically advanced civilization that was destroyed in the Earth Catastrophe?
Wow. They were endowed with so much knowledge. Its so beautiful it borders on mythical. Thanks for the upload. This was exactly what we all needed.
I must say that this is hard to take, but a much logic explanation to all those questions.
Fr
th-cam.com/video/OJz0mm8cSt4/w-d-xo.html
Thanks for the documentary. It was enjoyable but also raised many questions. For one, more evidence is needed to ascertain how many of the blocks were poured versus cut. It should be possible to do some analytical chemistry to support your claims. The making of the concrete that you suggest should be demonstrated in your film (not just an animation), and then the results should be shown side by side with a cut stone for contrast. Also, a little analysis of the two versions regarding strength testing and resistance to erosion would be appropriate. Clearly, if the concrete did not have the same bulk modulus as the cut stones, there would be great risk for collapse.
You also posit the use of solar power via a lens (magnifying glass) was used to melt granite so it could be poured. As far as I know, there is no archeological evidence for such a claim. The problem is that one could use one large lens, or many smaller ones to concentrate sunlight. In either case, there should be some of those lenses in the archeological record... and thus, they are conspicuous by their absence. Furthermore, assuming for the moment that such devices were actually used, there is the uncomfortable fact that when you melt the granite (mica,quartz,feldspar) you liquefy the crystal structure that formed during the cooling of the magma. Recall that the grain (crystal) size in igneous rock is proportional to the time it takes to cool, with larger crystals requiring more time to grow. All you will get from melting granite and cooling it quickly is obsidian, the black volcanic glass that forms when lava cools rapidly. Sorry, but that is just a geologic fact, and no amount of animation can change it. I'm pretty sure that there is no obsidian in the great pyramid.
I would also like to mention that the current understanding of human evolution has humans leaving Africa multiple times over the past 100k years. All modern humans have their ancestry in Africa. As humans migrated to higher latitudes, evolutionary pressures have favored the lightening of skin pigmentation and other superficial characteristics such as nasal and eye structures. One such pressure is the need to make vitamin D from sunlight. Not surprisingly, many different characteristics have emerged as humans adapted to micro environments separated by geological barriers. The fact that Egyptians are dark skinned is expected given their environment. What is surprising is the persistence of darker skins in higher latitudes like Britain, as we now know that some of the preserved bodies dating from 5k - 7k years ago had very dark skin compared to many modern inhabitants. In all cases, the genetic characteristics of people are a consequence of the geographical journeys taken by their ancestors. Mixing politics and science never ends well.
So while I applaud your creativity, you really need to develop your ideas more fully and provide more evidence for their use/existence.
I agree with you Charles. And in addition to your comments. Concrete is plausible but the big lenses to melt the granite? If the lens break due to accidents? The long workers line up the pyramid is ridiculous logistic point of view. They stay there all day long?? There have to be 2 lines, one for the return baskets and so on ! Sandu
You obviously didn't watch the whole thing.
@@jaredmoore2615 I did Jared. Did you read my comments? Workers move the buckets with concrete up the pyramid by twisting movements. That buckets appears to be minimum 10 Kg(in reality if filled with concrete is much heavier). Try doing that for one hour. Also when the pyramid is going up the movement is upward with the bucket (taking the bucket from the lower worker and giving it to the worker above)which is much more difficult to sustain for longer period of times. They must be SUPERMAN to do such kind of work. Or they have to have replacements every hour or so. Also the buckets have to be transferred back for reloading. The workers line became so long that the concrete in the bucket may freeze. Of course we can presume they will use fabric inside the bucket to prevent the concrete from freezing on the bucket's wall. But do you imaginer the quantity of fabric needed? Also the workers line is so long and tight that if some emergencies(biological necessity) occurs is a show stopper. Also the line is prone for accidents. Also the lens use is ridiculous not even a comment needed. Although the concrete theory is acceptable. Good animation and good choice for music though.
2hr 50 min in ? not analytical enough !
Not only that, it's well known that the Copts were the original Egyptians, and at least some have fair skin and blue or grey eyes to this day, like the scribe in the Egyptian museum. The obsession with race really spoiled it for me. Like you say we need more proof of the interesting poured vs cut, but when I started seeing pictures of giant magnifying lenses it started to get absurd and may as well have been aliens who brought the technology at that point. Still fascinating and thought provoking.
i have just recently visited the Great Pyramid of Giza and watched this amazing documentary and can quite honestly say that this completely answers the questions you have on how they were constructed but more importantly tells us that we need to be using solar power in more dramatic ways to reduce our energy consumption its so so simple thank you Fehmi, will be sure sure to share this documentary
I don't understand! in what way would it reduce the overall energy consumption? or did you mean something different and simply articulated it incorrectly?
@@cepheus7391 . Overall ? Who mentioned that besides you ? Do you think maybe its about fossil fuel consumption reducuction, not overall energy usage reduction ? Right ?
@Unkl_Bob @Unkl_Bob does it say reduce fossil consumption, or does it say reduce energy consumption? I can't tell you what they meant that is why I asked. I didn't need to say overall as it is bound to the statistic. I can't reduce human water consumption without it reducing the consumption of water overall. I cant recude the amount of air we breath without it reducing the consumed oxygen overall. Maybe they did mean fossils, which is why I made an assumption that maybe it was just articulated incorrectly.
The pharaoh asked Haman, his deputy and partner, to build a huge monument to prove to the people that God does not exist. Here Pharaoh resorted to the technique used at that time in construction which was lighting fire on stones in order to pour the needed stones for the monument. The Pharaoh said after that: “So kindle for me (a fire), O Hâmân, to bake (bricks out of) clay, and set up for me a Sarh (a lofty tower, or palace) in order that I may look at (or look for) the Ilâh (God) of Mûsâ (Moses); and verily, I think that he [Mûsâ (Moses)] is one of the liars."( AlQassas : 38).
farts
By far the best and most plausible explanation! Everything fits!
Remember that oldest hieroglyphs state that Thoth taught them (the Egyptians) maths, science a lot more. So who and where did Thoth come from?
Exactly, .... 4,000 years pass, and we still can't build dwellings without decimating the environment.....
Atlantis, his name is Djehuti (of) Atlantis
Or Thoth the Atlantean, atleast that's the word on Hermetic Streets
Uranus
@@gregbors8364 em, no...Uranus
Uhmz well maybe Thoth came from thought? thinking?| one could describe the emergence of a thought to be born out of nothing and therefor everything, out of our universe,in our head, a sign from god, from the stars out of nothing. Then off course years later this is interpreted as a alien entity. Makes sence to me anywayz
Question. How could the wood forms hold together? They apparently had no nails or screws to hold such Hugh and heavy forms. The amount of pressure exerted to the side of the pouring forms would break apart the form if not held rigidly. Poured material always takes the texture of the form used. Do the blocks have wooden texture on the sides?
not if they poured a section at a time, or if it was dry pack, then the pack would actually enforce the form
Hi Ricardo, I have not watched this, so I am not 100% sure of the context. But as to your question about no nails or screws fasteners: carpentry of antiquity did not use such fasteners. Carpentry of old used a variety of techniques like mortise and tenon, wood pegs, tongue and groove, knapp joint. Look up "ancient joinery" to see some amazing techniques. Peace.
@@gregkirschke5559 If that was the case. Then after a several pours the joints where the boards and the pegs meet would be more noticeable as the wood would swell with water absorption and pegs would be very difficult to extract. The texture of wood would be even more noticeable. If togue and groove or Knapp joints were used the forms would be impossible to take apart as the heat of the environment would dry the mixture between then and would actually crack.
If a lot of ancient buildings, temples could be built without any nails or metal, use of wooden mold to hold melting rocks seems entirely plausible.
@@pinview8519 Here are some facts about wood that you may research: Combustion temp. 233 degrees C / 451 degrees f, ignition temp 180 degrees C/ 356 degrees f, smoke temp 149 degrees c. /300 degrees f.
I would like a demo of melting granite and poured into a form!
@@biokemical glass is not granite
@@fester01 you didn’t watch the video obviously .. uncle fester
Go to praveen Mohans channel and see it done with black basalt.
@@cheynespc th-cam.com/video/I3pCs7jwK7I/w-d-xo.html
So if melting granite will make some type of obsidian, how did they melt granite and make it granite again? Also, how do you explain the saw marks located around the pyramids?
Absolutely outstanding!!! Thank you for the quality content!!
Wow! This just pulled together the centimeter, Water droplets, magnifying glass, Egypt, Peru, free masons, knights templar, metric system, philosopher stone, cement, sacred architecture, pi, the golden ratio, and racism!
racism ? Really ? Honestly asking ...
@@EQPaunders yeah man! Watch it
I don't understand the rule about the size of droplets... different quantities of water will produce different sizes of droplets? Won't they?
How is it possible to always produce 1cm shapes if the amount of water used is not fixed?
@@j.m.w.5064 I guess you're not understanding what a "droplet" of water means. It's the smallest size a droplet of water can be sure to surface tension. Not a vague "drop" of water
@@The_Paddle_Smith Yes, I really don't know. It's a real question and not covered criticism. I just couldn't follow the explanation.
...when I look at my kitchen sink, I see shapes smaller and larger - so under what circumstances do they form 1cm?
Cheers.
What about the Aswan Obelisk. Did they invent the concrete half way through chopping it out with their little rocks.?
Right!?
That was m first thought too!
Exactly.
They said in the video they cut it like that so they knew how much they needed. Just look at the marks on it if you cant tell that was done with a big magnifying glass then you never played with a magnifying glass. They wanted to keep it a secret as well and its fooling you over 4000years later
@@daverhin5975 yes sure and I suppose that explains the 2000 ton blocks in the Temple of Jupiter at Balbek and the one still in the quarry. How do a fool like you explain that?
ok so we need to see this theory tested, build a giant magnifying glass and pour a sphynx
what’s your ig btw
th-cam.com/video/BNSb5gPdqsA/w-d-xo.html
We cant pour it;)
Check this docu about cutting stones;)
th-cam.com/video/svAPyyUJUCo/w-d-xo.html
What about multiple smaller lenses. Point it at same spot.
@@tyrrellharvey this video just made this documentary real to me. Thank you!!! If only everyone in the comments could see what a small lenses can do to metals.
Absolutely amazing, binge watched the entire thing, thank you so much for your hard work!
This was amazing! The most "concrete" and believable theory I've heard to date. Very well done !
its aboluty concrete especially the majority
lab results
and time dont lie
they did not cut those stoned they were poured
and the sphinx was not Egyptian
assyrians get credit
@@davidleomorley889 where's your documentary?
@@davidleomorley889 okay, I'm all about learning and this documentary has been by far the most convincing. So I'll be among your first viewers if you do. Just holla
@@davidleomorley889 i just cant buy the fact that granite was cut to ezacting tolerances
like you said no technology
the time it would have taken
is mind boggling
so humans come out of stone age and do that no way
it explains why the wood is embedded
and time this theroy alse shows time being 10 -20 yrs
and allows for precise measures
@@davidleomorley889 whatever i have read and researched myself weren’t enough to convince me till date but i really appreciate the information you provided. I’ll go through each and every one of the link you provided. Appreciate it
I liked the film, but the question remains: how is it that you can't slip a piece of writing paper between the stones? Plus you would find it hard, if not impossible, to remove the moulds from between the stones without causing damage to them, as you 'd have to knock them out. I've cast concrete.
Once you lay the first stone block of concrete you can use that as the wall of one of the sides of the next stone. Hence the tiny gap.
@@wraith6766 Even if the block dries completely, if you make it with similar materials it will look and act as a solid block and will stick together. Pyramids today are torn up so you can see each individual block. You can see an example of poured concrete added onto dry concrete in the shafts how they form together as one even if misaligned slightly. They would have had to have a staging ground to make and dry block and transport it to the spot.
@@dambigfoot6844 I've never worked with this medium so this is just speculation, but I wonder if this mixture behaves differently than concrete. I wondered as well why they would cast individual blocks instead of larger pieces to minimize effort
You can’t slip a piece of paper between two natural rocks sitting on the ground... 😂
The casting theory does'nt seem to explain "the unfinished obelisk" ?
I am completely bedazzled by this epic documentary - I've visited the Great Pyramid when I was young, and felt the shear power of the Massive Chamber with the sarcophagus/graphite basin in it. I felt something very true and powerful that day. I must admit, my theory was more focused on the resonance side of things, being that Graphite in terms of acoustic reflections is ideal for maximum reverberation. I always felt that chamber was like a hospital surgeory room, using resonance/voice & harmony to heal an inviduals body of diseases and infections, due to the material of the walls, it was able to effectively create feedback as the sound had no where to go other than back on itself.. using sacred geometry to position the voices around the body for the full effect to be reached. or so that was my theory..
Amazing insights. Exactly how young when you visited Giza? And did you get all of that immediately or with later reflection? Food for thought. TY
@@tampauser6879 I was 13 years old when I went... and not all of it hit me then, only the raw power of the resonance in the chamber, sooo pure.. I then went onto persue my career in music even further, eventually going on to study a masters in audio engineering.. Whcih is why I thought my theory was so strong.
hmmm...food for thoughts!!
th-cam.com/video/BsqOLCXYznE/w-d-xo.html
Finding the harmonic resonance of something allows you to do amazing things. Tesla was able to destroy a building with a hammer, and he also blew out a few power distribution stations when his experiments hit the resonance point of the circuit. If you have a round pool, it's pretty easy to generate three-foot waves in a 15-foot pool with a period of one second.(my kids love it!). A far as healing, however... our bodies are *way* to complicated for that. We are not guitar strings. As far as pyramid power is concerned, Mythbusters busted it fairly convincingly. Then again, they did not repeat the experiment with 7.75 million tons of stone...
I have worked as a Mashed Potato Farmer for the last 25 years, and I can confirm the accuracy of this video.
@EBeggarsKOP - loving your sense of humour ❤.
Doesn't address the many tooling anomalies that are found on this ancient site , drill holes, saw cuts etc, falls short 🤙
does not address much ... just another brain fART by yet another human working things out trying to merge brain fARTS with heART work and the Sacred ARTS
@@islandbuoy4 yup, ignored all the anomalies that point to a very different history than the current model
I agree it does fall short in so many ways. It's quite clear that the ancients used the concrete method but they also used other more advanced methods. I don't think the gigantic solar lens is something that would melt that stone in those quantities, maybe for smaller things but not for those super large stones. And the super hard bowls have no characteristics of ever being melted. The colors are not mixed and granite looks like it was a ground up material instead of melted. So this isn't a great example, too many questions.
@@proverbs2522, cut holes and saw circular saw marks left in stones are but a few of many unexplained anomalies 🤙
Oh I know. I dont even use the word "history" unless it applies to a written or spoken narrative. I use our past or the past. History is written by the victorious so it's in fact his story; not mine or ours at all.
The only thing i’m confused about is the MASSIVE magnifying lens that would melt things, how tf did they figure that out??
I'd like to see that done today the way they did it. I don't think it's realistic or possible.
@@RonArgyle2011 Hi, here is the link of the one youre looking for: greenpowerscience.com/BLOGGER111/FresnelLensGranite.html
@@RonArgyle2011 or you can search it on youtube directly: granite melting using lens.😁😁
@@dwarvenerd9397 When you melt granite using lens you change it's structure, so you end up with obsidian..... Also, lens of size shown in a film... Not a chance
@@MrPaSSke I see, so its possible then that they just mix chemicals like the one they shown, instead by using solar lenses?