Damn straight man. Corruption should be met with serious time, as it undermines the rule of law, justice and democracy. It's tantamount to treason and is worse than say, counterfeiting or identity theft.
@@Stinngerr Then it needs thorough investigation. A cop tampering with and/or destroying evidence is VERY serious, any allegation of such corruption needs to be taken seriously. The camera being out of his possession and the deleted video needing to be recovered, plus that video containing evidence of the initial incident and the following police interactions (including an illegal arrest), is means, motive, and opportunity. Thorough investigation is the only appropriate response.
In my opinion, if a police officer is caught attempting to delete, conceal, or tamper with evidence in order to cover up their own unlawful actions, then they should face the same legal repercussions as a citizen who's committed that same action.
Yes most definitely they should be held to the same law plus a stiffer sentence because he is law enforcement period and should never act or do this. What a total power tripping officer. Ugh he was definitely a liability for this county. Wow wonder all the dirty shit he got away with. This wasn't his first time.
You’re so right but at least it caused him a brief problem. Hopefully, he’s going to learn but my bet is ‘not a chance’! He’ll be the same obnoxious guy there too. They shouldn’t rehire these guys. In Corporate America we used to call this ‘Pass the Trash’! Send them to be another’s problem. Sad, this affects Law Enforcement, not a bad Clerk or Assistant in an Office. This is why you go at least 3 deep when you check references.
@@misplacedsouthern1236 Yeah it's very frustrating. If you get fired from one PD, that should prevent you from ever working as an officer again. Most major PDs wont hire him, but it's the small town good ole boy PD who think just like him who end up hiring him.
One things fir certain, he’ll show up at another department soon. Unless these guys are truly tagged as ‘huge trouble’ they seem to find another Badge. I don’t understand why anyone would sign off on them but someone just seems to continue hiring these guys. I just watched a case that the guy had been through 4 departments & caused trouble everywhere he went & fast, too. Sad. I typically support the Police but these corrupt ones have to go. Until, the good Police Officers & Departments stop covering for them, this will continue. They make all look bad. Unfortunately, one bad act is known everywhere where the good Cops are rarely mentioned which is a lot like everything. Wouldn’t it be great to turn on the News and just one day - have nothing but good reported? That would be such a great surprise & uplighting! Just one day. Is there any News Team willing to do that for just one day? They’d have me a viewer for life.
Careful, that actually might be a benefit to the officer. If you quit, you are generally ineligible for unemployment; however, you may have a case for unemployment if terminated. It’d be a long shot since they would terminate with cause, but I could see any little mistake being used to allow for unemployment benefits. Additionally, being fired with cause is simply not a barrier of entry for another police job, as evidenced by the fact that “problem” cops often end up passed around multiple departments, changing hands once they also have an issue caused by that LEO.
@HarrisonGearns you know what i agreed with the op read yours thought, i agree but i feel i could tweak it. The police should have to finish the investigation, and if they find problems it should be mandatorily sent to the state certification agency for a mandatory suspension from the next agency, orif it resign in lew of termination, a revocation of their leo cert.
Being a douche? Wouldn't you be mad in his situation? How would you feel getting attacked for no reason because you were recording things out in public? He was far from being a douche...
The guy recording is incredibly inflammatory and instigating a whole mess of shit! I know he’s legally within his rights, but he really provokes the situation!!
@@skyliner3367 I wonder how many businesses this guy tried to antagonize before he got one that bit. I’m not saying he was outside the law, I’m saying he got what he deserved. Don’t put that douche on a pedestal
It also means he can apply at another department and his previous employer can only say "Yes, he worked here." ... Meaning he can get hired somewhere else.
Totally agree. He should have been up on criminal charges for evidence tampering and assault! No matter how rude and belligerent the auditor was it is no excuse for the officer attacking him and illegally arresting him etc... Plus he obviously knew he was in the wrong otherwise why attempt to delete the video footage.
@@cryv3n but who says that’s this is one mistake. The fact that he deleted the video shows that he knew what he did was wrong. It’s the power behind the position that makes them feel like they’re in control. Which means it will only get worse from here if unchecked
There's been convictions with the only charge being resisting arrest. I am *not* justifying this, just pointing out cases I've read about. We have way way too many bullshit laws and have become the exact type of government the constitution ans founding fathers warned about so desperately.
Imagine a world where you can be charged with the crime of "resisting"....by an officer trying to assault you with no R.A.S. of any crime BEFORE that.....oh wait, that's already the world we live in....these thugs think everything they say is a "lawful order" and everything they do is "justified".
fucking murrica. stop voting for corrupt mayors or whatever the crap is in charge. but i love that cops logic. aproaching a person means you are being arrested.
I was on a jury recently and argued exactly as you say, that as no evidence of suspect being informed of arrest was presented, he could not be convicted of resisting arrest.
@@sherryleigh1966 it was an obvious case of police retaliatory overcharging. They charged him with 7 or 8 counts. We found him not guilty on all but two and he was convicted essentially on disturbing the peace. No felony convictions.
@@critik_l @CamCritical Yes, I am well aware of the Supreme Court decisions, but thank you for pointing that out for others who may not know. I should have been clearer: "was he convicted of something else?"
That cameraman is the representation of being in the right legally but not socially or emotionally 🤣 bro was so annoying. Makes me think he really wanted all of that
@@obeseperson hey mr. Obese person, maybe fix your attitude about the world and be a positive human being with more love. Even in the face of those that may dislike you
How in the bleep does anyone still believe you need permission to record on public, or at all??? When there are literally surveillance cameras everywhere.
Surveillance videos are a bit different than people filming for monatized TH-cam videos. People can actually do privacy claims on TH-cam videos and they will be forced to blurr their face or take down the video.
Your headline was misleading as the officer wasn’t “Fired”, he was allowed to resign. Regardless of that, I thoroughly enjoy your content and continue to get educated by these videos.
@@GODCONVOYPRIMEbut you’ll miss the part where fat boy slaps the officer with an octopus before having his colleagues build a complete reconstruction of his childhood bedroom on that stretch of grass, the auditor then reads him a bedtime story after tucking him in, nice and snug, very exciting stuff.
Resigned and moved to the next department with no issues. Isn't that wonderful how they protect him and make sure his career can continue?! Ya love to see it.
The only non-bullshit part of that video title is "cop", although we could make sarcastic remarks about that bit. And this is not the first tabloid-style clickbait title on AtA. I hope this trend won't escalate further. Dunno, maybe he needs another channel for the energy he formely poured into adding annoying video blur filler. I often observe that people seem to have a kind of fixed insanity pool that they feel compelled to live out one way or another. I am not sure about the deep psychology behind it yet, but it's contributing to my worries about current social psychology.
I’m glad you mentioned the badmouthing Found it inappropriate too It’s sooooo much better when the auditor is totally peaceful and polite while others go nuts Really is able to show the crazed the situations
The Sgt is a real piece of work. He’s done this to other people before. He was comfortable in constructing the circumstances so he could apply charges and get some of that street justice so many bad officers like to hand out. Firing alone is too good for him.
@@laneeardink9849 Exactly. He left before the investigation could be conducted and moved on to another department. So unless the auditor wants to press charges the cop will get away with it with nearly no accountability.
@@laneeardink9849 I know they showed "resigned" but there is a video of the officer coming out of a building without his gun nor badge stating " I was just fired" that is actually tied to this video.
Mr. Roberts gets an F for intentionally instigating a first amendment audit without understanding property law and ownership of easements. It is completely expected that a chance encounter with the police may result in some factual misunderstandings surrounding the law by the auditor in question. However, Mr. Roberts was clearly seeking a police encounter and was fundamentally wrong in the law and the rights it would provide in the specific circumstances in which he was seeking the encounter. While the money Mr. Roberts gets from his TH-cam may be a secondary benefit, it still makes him a paid professional auditor and he must therefore meet a higher expectation of conduct just as we expect from the police.
Sheriff departments are highly political organizations owing to the fact that the Sheriff is an elected official. Given this fact they are packed with political hires by the party the Sheriff ran under. The only real 'qualification' for employment is that you vote for that party! As such the quality of the officer they employ has nothing to do with whether the person is qualified or even of moral character.
As a security contractor it’s astounding how many of my clients need to be reminded the legalities of filming in public. It’s always awkward when a client orders you to “stop someone’s filming” and you have to instead sit them down and professionally explain why what they’re doing is completely legal.
@@11274reece Honestly, it’s mostly just ignorance from my experience. They simply just don’t understand that public eye=the right to film. Once I explain establishing “a reasonable expectation of privacy” such as installing blinds or even solid perimeter fences that can’t be filmed through they usually understand a little better. But I’ve definitely had clients fly off the hinge at people recording before.
Legality of the action of filming has nothing to do with this bullshit. Instead of finding a productive place in life, these people point there cameras in hopes of a negative reaction. So one must ask themselves, why purposely set out to do things that they know will incite panic, annoy people and waste the time of law enforcement. Looking for trouble and finding it doesn’t make you a hero, it just makes you a dick.
Former security here. And yes, that was most definitely annoying. The main property I handled was split by a highway. So, yes, we owned both sides for about 1000-1500 feet from the highway, the highway itself are well as 10 feet to the sides are public/public use easement. And I had some... unique situations. From a guy stopped within the easement passed out drunk (parked vehicle, thankfully), to people lighting off fireworks in the easement, but less than 50 feet from some gas pumps. Luckily, the property manager had full authority from the owners, and she ALWAYS sided with me. As such, any time I made a call, I never had to worry about being overruled by the property manager. So when she asked my thoughts on a guy filming from the easement, I explained the law. And after that, she welcomed him onto the property and said he was allowed "anywhere a paying guest would be allowed, except within their room without their personal consent". She was easily the best manager I've ever had, even if she wasn't my direct manager.
If it wasn’t for a camera and a tazer maybe this dude wouldn’t have tried to pick a fight with each and every individual he encountered. I also believe Mr Roberts had been harassing this business.
Yeah, Americans are nuts. Over here, if someone did that, the cops would book him, beat the shit out of him and the court would throw out the case, camera footage or not. This is the definition of "asking for it".
@@patron7906 if you think he wasn't an asshole, I can't imagine how you are in public. His immediate reaction after getting pushed and potentially assaulted is understandable. After that guy left and the others took over, whom were much more calm and attempted to deescalate, the guy continued to escalate and be an asshole. When the cop asked him to please not yell, so as to prevent a situation escalating, the guy proceeded to escalate further and, be an asshole.
That Sargent immediately decided he was so powerful that he could arrest someone for what he did. And retiring before being fired should still lose their pension. Also deleting info from someone's camera is a criminal offense. This guy who retired should be brought up on charges.
It doesn’t matter. He’s a citizen it isn’t his job to de-escalate any situation and all the people he spoke to came up to him aggressively. Just because words they didn’t like were coming out of his mouth they were physically escalating.
@@Watts_that_behaviour you missed the entire point of Adam's comment. Yes, he was in the right legally speaking, Adam acknowledges that. He was also an asshole. A legal asshole. He went looking for trouble, knowing the law to carefully avoid breaking it, while goading other people to make them likely to break the law, which they did, and then gladly takes on the role of victim. It's the literal embodiment of "sophomoric" - a wise fool. That's like knowing ppl tend to run the red light at an intersection on a blind curve and going as slowly through it as you can with your green light repeatedly until someone hits you and then suing them. Legal. Still stupid and being an asshole and a good way to make your own community hate you.
How? He was walking and taking pictures. They escalated it by putting their hands on him. The cops were trying to put the blame on him, and when he wouldn't let them do that, they called in officer asshole to make it even worse. Had the dudes in the building minded their own business, none of this would have happened.
It's to expose the reaction. The way to not deal with the situations, also shows how cops deal with things and that is them dealing with it in violence. They don't care about people's life and future. But they think the people they deal with deserve it, it's just a circle of never ending violence, we humans can move past that instead of reply with "just whip his butt" you need to talk to people and change them, not physically assault them. Unless you are telling me that most humans are retorded and have revelations when they get their azz beat.
Have you ever noticed that the more someone says they don't want to be recorded, the closer they will get to the camera??? Clarence the puppet: "Do you see the contradiction?"
It's astonishing to me how many people attempt to solve problems by trying to force other people to alter their behavior, rather than altering their own.
Believe it or not, that’s actually the point. As a security officer of my own, these auditors act like that on purpose in the name of catching an officer slipping up. The only reason they shouldn’t be allowed to video record anything is if they are ON the private property. Otherwise it’s entirely legal and protected by the 1st amendment right
Auditors fulfill the function of a stress test for law enforcement. Stress tests are meant to push the boundaries to find failure points or demonstrate the resiliency of the police department.
@@reversefulfillment9189 I see your point but what does that have to do with screaming and crying to that random guy and calling him fat before the cops got there?
@EpicMailPotato He was in the middle of being harassed and pushed around, that will get your adrenaline up, I think we can give him a pass for getting angry about the situation. I'll agree that it wasn't very creative to state the obvious by calling him a fatty. We should all aspire to have more colorful quips and retorts in our repertoire for times like this.
@@reversefulfillment9189or they're looking to get rich off of tax dollars. I have a feeling not all of them are pure hearted patriots risking it all for the greater good. Just saying.
Pig did get away with it lmao, he was only "fired" (resigned instead of being actually fired). Not charged for either the illegal arrest/assault or deleting the video, lol. Watch that him still get some government paid benefits because he resigned instead of officially fired. It wouldnt be the first time a "fired" piggy still gets paid.
@@Blue-hf7xt Same as any hard drive data recovery, there are programs for it. Deleting data doesn't actually remove it from a HDD/SD card it just marks teh data as overwritable.
They've always done this kinda shit and then they get the 3 other officers on scene to lie and support the main officer's story to cover it up. It's just that now it's harder for them to get away with it
Imagine growing up in the 60s when there was absolutely no threat of police being recorded on cameras. And the added element of doing anything While Black.
Dang, that cop who ended up arresting the guy was clearly trying to provoke a reaction so he _could_ arrest him. If someone is backing away from you, and you keep approaching them, that's a threat in any other situation.
The camera man was shit stirring. I'm not a cop so I'm not restricted to these laws. He is lucky to be in one piece. No time for idiots. Running around pretending to be lawyers with a taser? Piss off fuckwit
Sure it's public property, but the officer was clearly trying to intimidate this guy, because he's a power hungry tyrant with a badge. Pretty obvious he was in the wrong considering he got fired
@@waynedieckmann9840 Not talking about that. I'm specifically talking about the cop at the end, who just kept walking forward at the guy while the guy was backing away. There was no taser involved in that interaction at all.
The last officer was cosplaying a spec ops soldier. Right when he showed up I knew he'd be the main villain. The chubby civilian could well have been an ex-cop.
So if they resign they can't be charged, Keep benefits and could do so many crimes with a free pass? Why even have laws. Not a question but a statement! Go to school be a cop, be corrupt make cash break the law and resign. 5 star
Whether lawful or not if your arresting someone if it isn't announced before you begin arresting them any kind of struggle should never be considered resisting.
Thats what I was thinking. Its quite an automatic reflex to pull away from someone grabbing you. If the cop said 'turn around your under arrest', this at least would dull the automatic reflex.
Great breakdown on the auditor's behavior. The Sherif definitely deserves a gold star for conducting the investigation and the first two deputies get silver for patience. Firing a member of a public employee union is extremely difficult. In many cases a resignation is best to avoid reinstatement and backpay after an arbitrator decides in the employee's favor.
@@dries-pederjanse6249 sweet lord Jesus I feel sorry for you and your way of thinking. Please don’t breed. Do America a favor ☺️ In case you’re not understanding, as the camper said, this is a legit question: how can someone with a camera cause someone to commit PHYSICAL VIOLENCE!? Lol that’s literally what you are implying by your comment. Please. Just stop while you’re ahead. Or keep going and give us all a laugh every time you say something. Your choice 😉
I put money on the fact that the Sergeant who was fired was the ‘husband’ when the first two workers yelled out “call 911, call your husband”. That would be why he went right up to the auditor trying to escalate things. His behaviour seemed personal to me.
@@jonathan-bk4gb I believe that cop should have been fired, hell, he should have been arrested, but that citizen is a douche bag and if he had gotten his skull cracked, it would have been poetic justice, nut justice justice, but poetic for sure.
But he wasn’t fired. He resigned for personal reasons so just gets recycled in the system with a huge grudge. They should fire him and he should be barred from LEO work
@@quinlanhogan3072 The auditor was crass off the bat. He really has a "sovereign citizen" vibe and those people, in my experience, are just "holier than thou" assholes. No actual credibility, but a nuisance.
Yea I tend to hate these ‘auditors’ because they seem to exist to provoke people into altercations. Which I guess is the whole point of it but it’s so annoying to watch sometime
@@henryojeda2890 that’s all they’re about. Now an unplanned traffic stop that wasn’t instigated by the auditor, that’s good work. But these auditors harassing the public under the guise of “journalism?” Those people suck so much. 90% of these people can’t even spell journalism. Losers.
@@RemedieXPretty easy to prove. Officer confiscated camera and it was deleted in that officers possession. They have very specific procedures to follow involving evidence.
a few minutes in and Id already give the guy an F for being an annoying piece of shit non stop insulting always aggressive and reaaally trying to have this immediatly escalated to have cops called.
I agree the auditor should have gotten a lower grade. I feel he was baiting and rude. BUT that cop was trying to intimidate by walking up on the auditor. AND by trying to erase the video. Also he WASN'T immediately fired but allowed to resign. I bet he gets a job in another town.🤔
Dude was 100% told to resign and was referred to another department. Nothing comes from these incidents besides the officer having to pack up and move on to the next community to terrorize. The united states courts need to take these incidents much more seriously and treat police officers like this one with the same swift justice they enforce on every other tax paying citizen. That is the ONLY way we get the bad eggs out for good.
And such internal investigations need to be open the the public so everyone can see exactly how the individuals involved reached their conclusions. None of this "no evidence of wrongdoing was found" should be allowed unless the investigation was clearly done properly and a subject of record.
Police officers should be held to a higher standard than ordinary citizens. They are entrusted with representing the government and carrying out their responsibilities with professionalism.
Tyler King, Very well said and an excellent point. I agree 💯% and I very much appreciate the civility you said it with. So many people today either get belligerent or violent whether they are right or wrong, both in the video and in many of these comments. But as shown in the video the guy was within his rights but his disgusting mouth and not letting the deputies do their job, is probably the reason they called for the Sargent. Again, excellent comment my friend.
"Arrested for resisting arrest." This charge should not be allowed to stand alone. Always love this one. Imagine if you were sent to jail for being sent to jail or shot for being shot.
Circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works...
The reason it is, is because police can detain you for suspicion of a crime, and you have to comply with that. If you resist a lawful detention, even if the investigation clears you of other charges, you still committed a crime by resisting.
@@AceRasputin yet their oath says they aren't cops at that moment, and their own spells clearly articulate our freedoms in "neutralizing" blatant criminals/terrorists... seems quite cut and dry for some "swift justice"
@@julialibor9341 "His free speech was mean spiritted" See the thing about these Rights is they don't magically go away if you're a prick. You still get to have those rights. Being insufferable doesn't remove those rights from you. Disliking someone or how they're presenting something doesn't invalidate what they're saying or the points they make. You might think it's justified but the law doesn't care about moral justification.
@@joeblow2069 And he STILL didn't get fired. They allowed him to resign. Cops investigating their friends and letting their friends off easy, no charges.
@@JD-xz1mx By firing him for his criminal actions. If that happened, he would be liable to be sued, and he might spend some prison time for his criminal actions. Instead, he gets to resign with benefits, no jail time, because his buddies didn't want him to get in trouble.
@@henrytawnn8694 If every meeting where someone has the same people where someone gets fired in the room, and you walk into the room and they ask if there is anything you want to say before you get started. You both save face and keep the trend going of being able to move to a neighboring county without any formal repercussions. That said too, if you have 20 years of service and make one mistake - the issue was not that you made one mistake, it was that you let it be a public one. Policing is a very unforgiving when dealing with shows of force against unarmed citizens.
>they never had friends You never been to highschool the biggest spastics had friends. I wish i got that uppity girl. She seemed alright. But when she tripped oh man....
I think its important to recall that at 03:15 the employees said "Call your husband", which ends up being the cop that took him down and arrested him. I bet that cop is on a new department now. Maybe even a lateral move as Sgt.
Exactly! He obviously showed up already mad, and had chosen a side. His wife probably called and told him some bs. So he showed up to try and intimidate dude, and then assaulted him. He should have been charged.
This is fault of judges and police chiefs who allowed this kind atitudes like they normal against citizens who should be protect !! This is so like dictators regimes polices,that is sad to see it without rage and frustration for you, how could this happen even when they know they are on camera!?!? Cities shouldnt allow this kind of atitudes being payed for all when should be the police officer who pay when crimes being commited by the the LAW OFFICERS!
The sheriff's office should be filing criminal charges against that deputy for any assault and tampering with evidence. Resigning should not alleviate you from the consequences of your actions. But you know they protect their own so he'll probably just move to another law enforcement job.
I can't help but notice that in, most situations like this, when the person tells them "I have it all on camera", the cops almost NEVER actually asked to see the video. You'd think that would be one of the first things they'd want to see.
I got pulled over for running a stop sign by a rookie cop on her first day, and as soon as I pointed to the display in my Tesla and offered to look at the video, that ticket turned into a "warning". 🙂 I knew I had stopped at the stop sign - it was maybe a 2 second stop, but then there's nothing in the law which specifies how long a car has to be motionless.
To be fair, many laws and policing policies are out of date around the ability for nearly everything to record video now days (cameras, cellphones, dashcams, even cars themselves like Tesla). There should be mandatory training on video laws and best practices - to your point of actually viewing the video and lawfully obtaining a copy of it- for all law enforcement and best practice for security guard companies. After viewing the video in this case, the officers should have arrested the assaulting man in this and the scenario would have never been enough of an issue for this video. Simple assault of a citizen.
@@murrijuana2842 You're right, they aren't, but part of basic police work is to gather or preserve evidence and use evidence to determine what if any crimes had been committed, seems like they didn't do either in this case.
This was a Sgt. Imagine how he's been dealing with people over his entire career. There's something called the Peter Principle, which is an observation that the tendency in most organizational hierarchies is for every employee to rise in the hierarchy through promotion until they reach a level of respective incompetence. Once hired, each officer rises through the ranks over their career until they reach this point.
Yes, this makes perfect logical sense. There are cultural norms in all organizations and what is normal for one is likely normal for the others. You can see the attitude on the ginger cop who first approached him too.
Hello, I think you are close but not quite right, my understanding of the Perter Principle is that you rise ONE level above what you are competent at. So the Sgt would be a good constable ( seeing this video I doubt he was a good fit at that level ) but a hopeless Sgt.
@@JR-wu8dc no day ruins here. You guys think your so smart tho. Had to let you know. It’s ok it isn’t easy acting like America isn’t America. Just know these people MAKE the comfort in which you reside
The amount of research you do is incredible. It makes me cringe because it reminds me of the research I had to do for my thesis--but that was for one thesis. You do this research for every video you put up. I don't know if I should commend you or worry about you. Thanks for doing it.
Many times, a criminal case has been heard in court and the laws by the prosecution and defense would be available in motions. If a civil suit was filed, it would have the laws/case law noted in the suit.
They let him resign. That is tantamount to approval of his actions. They acknowledge that his behavior makes them look bad, but they proactively chose to do as much as they possibly could to help an officer who assaulted and illegally arrested someone and then deleted evidence to cover up his crime. Allowing a man like that to resign means the people who run that department are themselves like that.
Sgt. Morrison was given the opportunity to resign instead of fired, so he can now go work for another Law Enforcement Agency and continue with his tyrannical behavior.
Deleting footage (destroying evidence) should come with a mandatory 10 year prison sentence and a $20,000 fine when you swear an oath and decide to break it.
@@praisethesun6078 Perhaps, but that runs contrary to one's debt to society being cleared once punishment is concluded. A permanent constraint of that nature should be sparingly applied if that sentiment is indeed meant to predominantly be a value we hold.
narcissist's love to claim they were the victims, and call the police. And the property is public. there is a public road, there is a mailbox, fire hydrants, gas lines, etc. Even a property marker, 20 feet from the road.
You shouldn't be using big cameras...and your footage should be saved to the cloud as it's being recorded... luckily this guy didn't have his evidence destroyed...there are much better ways to ensure your footage can't be destroyed by criminal police.
@@GSP-76 The fact that they tried and failed makes the bulky equipment worth it. If there's a way to attack a microdevice to a bigger one, that may actually make for perfect bait...
@RobJo He has the same mindframe like some of the people abusing the welfare system popping out more kids they can't support so they can get $500+ a kid from the hardworking tax payers each month. He's just out looking for lawsuits instead of women to knock up. I've seen these types of videos before but a lot of the time the cameraman is respectful and more doing it for a learning experience for police that don't know the entirety of the laws they are required to abide by and enforce. This cameraman, however was just a douche trying to break some eggs to find some broken eggs. He isn't for bettering society. He isn't for educating the public or LEO's. He's looking for a nice check from the taxpayers. I don't know how anyone can respect that, but you already know who he is calling if he is ever in an emergency.
@@xJay28x I don't disagree with anything you say, all makes sense.. but I believe my point stands, if you don't abuse your power then the system wouldn't have to pay out lawsuits regardless which idiot is trying to get one.
@RobJo I agree with you, but there are always going to be bad apples. Whether it's race, religion, or profession, there are always going to be bad ones that give the good ones a bad name. I'm a firm believer in more screening for the police, body cameras, as well as periodic mental fitness evaluations. They deal with a lot of things the majority of society won't ever see. What I think should change though is that instead of the city forking over money for lawsuits on the police that can't maintain their composure like the last cop in the video, the money should come out of their pension or at the bare minimum have a waiver/morality clause in their employment contract that relieves the department from responsibility of the police officers actions if they go off the book or abuse their power, and places the financial burden on the police officer him/herself.
Agreed, he lost most of his credibility by being so confrontational and just plain rude. The first two cops were reasonable, the senior one was a terrible example for his junior officers.
I think it is obvious that he was spoiling for a fight. The point is to exercise rights, not taunt people and make an ass out of yourself. That sets the cause back.
Yeah this grading the first two officers a C and the clown a B+ when neither side did anything legally wrong. Clown gets a B+ for trying to start a fight and the cops get a C for not kissing his ass? Fucking asinine.
I've lost some respect for Audit the Audit with him giving this dude a B+ and the first officers a C. I think both officers and the videographer could have handled it better and both groups were equally right/wrong about the laws. The sergeant needs to be as far away as possible from any position of authority, I wouldn't trust him to round up carts at the grocery store.
I believe there should be a database both on the state and national level for any officer who has been fired or resigned in an attempt to avoid being fired. Further, along that same vein, I believe there should be a national database for anyone convicted of child or elder abuse.
Filming in public is just so creepy. No one likes some random camera pointed in their direction and he was doing it to prove a point that he CAN do it. The problem is, not one wants to watch a video of someone taking a video of a building. They WILL watch a video that ends up like this for enjoyment purposes only. You can tell he HOPES that something like this will happen so he can sue and get some money to pay for a better camera.
@@shannonbayley3684 It is a word. It means "talked about at length already". That said he probably just got autocorrected trying to say de-escalated. Still, both words fit fine.
Problem is the cop tried to grab him BEFORE telling him he's "under arrest." Until they say it, they're just attacking you and you have a right to defend yourself.
Exactly....likewise I don't agree with ATA giving the other 2 cops a C grade....it would have been a C if nothing else happened....cops that stand by and do NOTHING while one of their blue line gang buddies acts the way he did....in my opinion....are just as guilty.....and showing how they all stick together....allowing the cop to "resign"...is BS... he'll just show up in another department some time down the road....if they took this stuff seriously, that cop would be fired and never be able to be law enforcement again.
That's the cure for all this. COMPLETELY ignore these people. Then all they're left with is boring videos of nothing, nobody will watch them and POOF, gone🤷♂️
The fired cop probably went down the road to the next town/county and got on with the PD or Sheriff's office. These guys are rarely held accountable and their criminality is usually swept under the rug.
That is why many police and sheriffs departments have changed many rules on where they live now. In the past you had to live in the city or county where you worked.
Because that makes it easier for the complainant to win a lawsuit against the city. That one Sheriff in Florida is probably the only LEO in the US that acts in a serve and protect manner in the public.
What I don’t get he wasn’t under arrest and he was tackled. Shouldn’t he be going to jail for assault? If I just randomly start tackling people on the street I would go to jail.
To be clear Florence and the Horry County PD are always in a battle as to who is the least knowledgeable or professional agency. So this isn't rare or surprising.
@@DGZGSGEGIGKG Disturbing the peace and Obstruction is the two utilized in my state by out of control LEOs to arrest those who don’t submit or they just don’t like.
I agree. But it's designed to be a stress test. Put them through the worst so you feel confident they act reasonably all other times. We should be giving them kudos if they handle the situations well. Sadly we don't often get to see those cases
I think it’s one of those things where you live and you learn. The guy who got arrested is young and hasn’t learned how to behave in situations like this. You gotta grease those wheels, not act like a cocky shit. Though he should not have been arrested, he also should not have expected the officers to be very sympathetic to his situation considering his attitude and behavior.
usually you only get a pension when you work somewhere long enough, more than likely he just moved districts and now works in a different office. Stop smoking crack mate, you should use critical thinking more
I'm guessing Sgt Morrison is the "husband" in the "go call your husband" statement. The fact that he responded to the scene simply because his wife works there and escalated situation after it was already settled is just more reason for him to be charged.
I haven’t finished the video yet and I’m sure there is a bad cop who does a bad thing but right now the guy doing the initial filming is a huge problem. He’s being combative and it’s like he’s doing this specifically to get a rise out of someone hoping they’ll put hands on so he can call foul. No one should touch another person like that but he was only escalating the situation.
True he didn't have to but he had right to act the way he did just like you have the right to call him an asshole but dude you didn't have to in fact all this verbiage is irrelevant to the bottom-line the story can't disagree with that I don't think😮
I agree, but what I'm curious about is why did they feel the need to come all the way out there? If they thought he was casing the joint on private property, they shouldn't have confronted him themselves, they should have called the cops. However, I agree that he's needlessly escalating the situation by being the world's biggest jackass
I remember this. These cops are out of control especially in the South! The only difference is that the guy would've been a minority...he probably would've been unalived 😢
This right here is exactly why the public has lost all respect and trust for law enforcement. They’ve turned into SUCH BULLIES that they believe they have to SLAM THEM TO GROUND, DOING GREAT PHYSICAL HARM IN MOST CASES. They also right away start screaming “Don’t resist”, no matter what the person is doing, they use ANY excuse for physical abuse. It’s so disgusting, coupled with that smart ass mouthing..
Forreal it's s wild how they don't seem to know their actual job smh, I don't care how annoying someone maybe, it's not illegal, they just seem to want to arrest anyone they don't like.
So you'll trash ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT, on this planet for the 5-600 shit ass cops across the planet, gee, wonder what you would say if someone blamed ALL your race or religion or culture or profession, ALL OF EM, for some shit that less than 2% of said race, culture, religion etc. Was responsible for, would really like to see your response to that if it was thrown your way!!!
It was soooooo satisfying seeing this guy get taken to the ground like that, lol. Just as satisfying as knowing that the cop "resigned". Both of these people are insufferable.
@@diggles7015 it was satisfying I hate people who are just rude and disrespectful and instigate stupid situations. He cried like a little bi--h when he got tackled *HELP* LMAO
@@Brandyyyyy The camera guy is a prick but that cop was way out of line. He just kept walking up to him and was asked to back off and continued. He was arrested for not wanting a cop to stand 6 inches from his face and for backing away.
Nah I’m with that officer on this 1. That citizen is an asshole and that officer knew, it’s unfortunate that he had to resign but at least his record is not tarnished, personally I got very happy when he arrested that dude
@@andranikpapazyan3150 bro, what? Being an asshole isn't a crime and to arrest someone they need to have committed a crime. Deleting evidence after the fact is not a good trait for a cop to possess.
@@andranikpapazyan3150 Anyone can be an "asshole", it is not illegal nor a crime. The cop was allowed to resign, but probably should have been charged. And hatred of someone doesn't mean that person should be arrested, assaulted or abused or had property destroyed, as in the case of that now unemployed cop.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 87 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องชัย vs โชคปรีชา"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YN6e7HVnekw/mqdefault.jpg)
I will never understand how cops don't get charged for deleting video footage of these auditors. That alone should be automatic jail time.
Damn straight man. Corruption should be met with serious time, as it undermines the rule of law, justice and democracy. It's tantamount to treason and is worse than say, counterfeiting or identity theft.
It’s because the entire system is corrupted and against the people.
Yeah destroying evidence is really bad, makes you wonder how many times he's done that before.
I think it is hard to prove that it was deleted... it requires a lot of prerequisite steps to prove it
@@Stinngerr Then it needs thorough investigation. A cop tampering with and/or destroying evidence is VERY serious, any allegation of such corruption needs to be taken seriously. The camera being out of his possession and the deleted video needing to be recovered, plus that video containing evidence of the initial incident and the following police interactions (including an illegal arrest), is means, motive, and opportunity. Thorough investigation is the only appropriate response.
In my opinion, if a police officer is caught attempting to delete, conceal, or tamper with evidence in order to cover up their own unlawful actions, then they should face the same legal repercussions as a citizen who's committed that same action.
Yes most definitely they should be held to the same law plus a stiffer sentence because he is law enforcement period and should never act or do this. What a total power tripping officer. Ugh he was definitely a liability for this county. Wow wonder all the dirty shit he got away with. This wasn't his first time.
It’s called obstruction of justice
DEATH PENALTY!
Disagree....Not the same but even heavier, since they are given way more power and that requires them to very carefully use that.
I agree 100% with you and I would fire everyone on the spot and get my get my uniform off quick you are a disgrace to this department.
Misleading title. He was not fired. He was allowed to resign, meaning he's already on a different force 40 miles up the highway
You’re so right but at least it caused him a brief problem. Hopefully, he’s going to learn but my bet is ‘not a chance’! He’ll be the same obnoxious guy there too. They shouldn’t rehire these guys. In Corporate America we used to call this ‘Pass the Trash’! Send them to be another’s problem. Sad, this affects Law Enforcement, not a bad Clerk or Assistant in an Office. This is why you go at least 3 deep when you check references.
Probably introduced as a Star Police Officer in his first day! 🤮
@@misplacedsouthern1236 Yeah it's very frustrating. If you get fired from one PD, that should prevent you from ever working as an officer again. Most major PDs wont hire him, but it's the small town good ole boy PD who think just like him who end up hiring him.
Yep, basically he did not face any consequences
He was fired bro, when you are hit with the “we’ve got to let you go, but we will let you resign to keep your dignity” is him getting fired lol
He was not fired...he was allowed to resign with benefits...a big difference
Wrong he was fired from
The department! Then he committed non-live
@@bagelthug he litterally says in the video that the officer resigned
That man was fired
One things fir certain, he’ll show up at another department soon. Unless these guys are truly tagged as ‘huge trouble’ they seem to find another Badge. I don’t understand why anyone would sign off on them but someone just seems to continue hiring these guys. I just watched a case that the guy had been through 4 departments & caused trouble everywhere he went & fast, too. Sad. I typically support the Police but these corrupt ones have to go. Until, the good Police Officers & Departments stop covering for them, this will continue. They make all look bad. Unfortunately, one bad act is known everywhere where the good Cops are rarely mentioned which is a lot like everything. Wouldn’t it be great to turn on the News and just one day - have nothing but good reported? That would be such a great surprise & uplighting! Just one day. Is there any News Team willing to do that for just one day? They’d have me a viewer for life.
@@entrell18don't be so ignorant... we're still paying every "officer" in this video.
There needs to be a law to prevents police from “resigning” while under investigation. They should be able to be retroactively terminated.
In this case, he should be in *prison* by now.
But instead he was most likely re-employed the next day with a nearby department, sheriffs office, or state police.
Careful, that actually might be a benefit to the officer. If you quit, you are generally ineligible for unemployment; however, you may have a case for unemployment if terminated. It’d be a long shot since they would terminate with cause, but I could see any little mistake being used to allow for unemployment benefits. Additionally, being fired with cause is simply not a barrier of entry for another police job, as evidenced by the fact that “problem” cops often end up passed around multiple departments, changing hands once they also have an issue caused by that LEO.
@@TCK-9 Thus America gets the police force it deserves.
@HarrisonGearns you know what i agreed with the op read yours thought, i agree but i feel i could tweak it. The police should have to finish the investigation, and if they find problems it should be mandatorily sent to the state certification agency for a mandatory suspension from the next agency, orif it resign in lew of termination, a revocation of their leo cert.
Though he was within his rights, he didn't have to be a douche the whole time. Well stated, sir.
People like this guy out to just waste everyone’s time looking to pick a fight. Dude got what he deserved.
Being a douche? Wouldn't you be mad in his situation? How would you feel getting attacked for no reason because you were recording things out in public? He was far from being a douche...
The guy recording is incredibly inflammatory and instigating a whole mess of shit! I know he’s legally within his rights, but he really provokes the situation!!
@@skyliner3367 I wonder how many businesses this guy tried to antagonize before he got one that bit. I’m not saying he was outside the law, I’m saying he got what he deserved. Don’t put that douche on a pedestal
@@skyliner3367 He insulted everyone the whole time. He's the definition of a douche.
Destroying evidence means that he isn't just incompetent. It means he KNOWS he did something wrong.
Which is exactly why he needs to face criminal charges.
It's an explicit admission of guilt
Yes but that is common practice in law enforcement in the United States.
Adding to that, he has others under his command, so all of them are the same.
Go back to high school. Walk in a cops shoes one day and youd be shtting your pants
"YOU DON'T HAVE MY AUTHORIZATION TO FILM ME"
*Zooms in immediately after*🤣🤣
“Let’s discuss the contradiction”
The fact that he was able to resign which means he can still get his pension, there needs to be charges filed for evidence tampering.
It also means he can apply at another department and his previous employer can only say "Yes, he worked here." ... Meaning he can get hired somewhere else.
Totally agree. He should have been up on criminal charges for evidence tampering and assault! No matter how rude and belligerent the auditor was it is no excuse for the officer attacking him and illegally arresting him etc... Plus he obviously knew he was in the wrong otherwise why attempt to delete the video footage.
yes but one mistake doesnt mean ruining somebodies life. people get better too.
@@cryv3n but who says that’s this is one mistake. The fact that he deleted the video shows that he knew what he did was wrong. It’s the power behind the position that makes them feel like they’re in control. Which means it will only get worse from here if unchecked
@@cryv3n do citizens get the same consideration? No? Yeah I didn’t think so. Stfu trying to lick their ass
He wasn't even told he was under arrest until he was tackled. You can't resist arrest if you're not even under arrest yet.
There's been convictions with the only charge being resisting arrest.
I am *not* justifying this, just pointing out cases I've read about.
We have way way too many bullshit laws and have become the exact type of government the constitution ans founding fathers warned about so desperately.
😂 makes too much sense
Imagine a world where you can be charged with the crime of "resisting"....by an officer trying to assault you with no R.A.S. of any crime BEFORE that.....oh wait, that's already the world we live in....these thugs think everything they say is a "lawful order" and everything they do is "justified".
fucking murrica.
stop voting for corrupt mayors or whatever the crap is in charge.
but i love that cops logic. aproaching a person means you are being arrested.
Don’t you know in America if a cop looks at you or even smells you you’re under arrest
I was on a jury recently and argued exactly as you say, that as no evidence of suspect being informed of arrest was presented, he could not be convicted of resisting arrest.
What happened? Was the defendant convicted anyway?
@@sherryleigh1966 he said he was on the jury. A jury requires a unanimous decision.
@@sherryleigh1966 it was an obvious case of police retaliatory overcharging. They charged him with 7 or 8 counts. We found him not guilty on all but two and he was convicted essentially on disturbing the peace. No felony convictions.
@@critik_l @CamCritical Yes, I am well aware of the Supreme Court decisions, but thank you for pointing that out for others who may not know. I should have been clearer: "was he convicted of something else?"
@@TrekBeatTK You mean to say he was convicted essentially on disrespecting police.
"He aint my homie" lmao the way he said it got me rolling
Same! 😂😂😂
That cameraman is the representation of being in the right legally but not socially or emotionally 🤣 bro was so annoying. Makes me think he really wanted all of that
THANK YOU. these channels’ comments are full of losers who think the world is against them
@@geekedupwhiteboywell it clearly is if the dude was legally in the right but still detailed lmao
@@obeseperson hey mr. Obese person, maybe fix your attitude about the world and be a positive human being with more love. Even in the face of those that may dislike you
@@geekedupwhiteboy Well when you act like this, how can you be surprised that everyone dislikes you.
@@zym6687 i would love it. knowing the ppl that dislike me in such ways are unwell.
How in the bleep does anyone still believe you need permission to record on public, or at all??? When there are literally surveillance cameras everywhere.
Mostly true, except Arizona has outlawed filming police officers with many states planning on following
Surveillance videos are a bit different than people filming for monatized TH-cam videos. People can actually do privacy claims on TH-cam videos and they will be forced to blurr their face or take down the video.
Entitlement and ignorance.
@@evandiliberto6238 How will they outlaw it when that is most definitely unconstitutional? Courts will throw that out.
Cause if they keep making the mistake it'll eventually be "well the cops don't get it, so it'll just HAVE go be law now."
Your headline was misleading as the officer wasn’t “Fired”, he was allowed to resign.
Regardless of that, I thoroughly enjoy your content and continue to get educated by these videos.
Really? I'm five minutes in and that's the case? All right well I don't need to watch the rest of this video if that's the case.
@@GODCONVOYPRIMEbut you’ll miss the part where fat boy slaps the officer with an octopus before having his colleagues build a complete reconstruction of his childhood bedroom on that stretch of grass, the auditor then reads him a bedtime story after tucking him in, nice and snug, very exciting stuff.
Resigned and moved to the next department with no issues. Isn't that wonderful how they protect him and make sure his career can continue?! Ya love to see it.
ATA getting something wrong. Say it aint so.
The only non-bullshit part of that video title is "cop", although we could make sarcastic remarks about that bit.
And this is not the first tabloid-style clickbait title on AtA. I hope this trend won't escalate further.
Dunno, maybe he needs another channel for the energy he formely poured into adding annoying video blur filler. I often observe that people seem to have a kind of fixed insanity pool that they feel compelled to live out one way or another. I am not sure about the deep psychology behind it yet, but it's contributing to my worries about current social psychology.
I’m glad you mentioned the badmouthing
Found it inappropriate too
It’s sooooo much better when the auditor is totally peaceful and polite while others go nuts
Really is able to show the crazed the situations
Imagine that, cop quit his job and no charges were filed. That sure seems like a lack of accountability and a 2 tier system of "justice".
Officer thumbs-in-vest is wearing his tactical security blanket.
Yep, even worse, this idiot cop will just go to another department to continue his reign of terror on the general public.
That pig is a full on psyco! I wonder where he works now as a cop?
You can believe he is on someone police force as we speak.
He’ll be on the committee tribunal too
The Sgt is a real piece of work. He’s done this to other people before. He was comfortable in constructing the circumstances so he could apply charges and get some of that street justice so many bad officers like to hand out. Firing alone is too good for him.
I feel sorry for his boyfriend and dog...
he wasn't even fired. He 'resigned'. He probably just moved to another department.
@@laneeardink9849 Exactly. He left before the investigation could be conducted and moved on to another department. So unless the auditor wants to press charges the cop will get away with it with nearly no accountability.
He wasnt even fired for the attack. Bur for a policy violation. Like wow
@@laneeardink9849 I know they showed "resigned" but there is a video of the officer coming out of a building without his gun nor badge stating " I was just fired" that is actually tied to this video.
Saw this when it first happened. Still makes me sick. Just imagine how many people have suffered at the hands of this thug before he ‘left”.
Now he'll be re hired by some other department...
@@volvo09 shit pisses me off how he can j go to a different department 10 mins down the road
For sure, none should ever visit USA, pure A.I.D.S.
Mr. Roberts gets an F for intentionally instigating a first amendment audit without understanding property law and ownership of easements. It is completely expected that a chance encounter with the police may result in some factual misunderstandings surrounding the law by the auditor in question. However, Mr. Roberts was clearly seeking a police encounter and was fundamentally wrong in the law and the rights it would provide in the specific circumstances in which he was seeking the encounter. While the money Mr. Roberts gets from his TH-cam may be a secondary benefit, it still makes him a paid professional auditor and he must therefore meet a higher expectation of conduct just as we expect from the police.
Sheriff departments are highly political organizations owing to the fact that the Sheriff is an elected official. Given this fact they are packed with political hires by the party the Sheriff ran under. The only real 'qualification' for employment is that you vote for that party! As such the quality of the officer they employ has nothing to do with whether the person is qualified or even of moral character.
That guys a nightmare cop only asked him to stop yelling while he's dealing with it,he's making things harder to get sorted 😂
Nah man, the cop threatened him immediately, not asked without threat of penalty.
He was assaulted, almost got his camera wrecked - I'd yell and demand police officers to protect me and do their job
As a security contractor it’s astounding how many of my clients need to be reminded the legalities of filming in public. It’s always awkward when a client orders you to “stop someone’s filming” and you have to instead sit them down and professionally explain why what they’re doing is completely legal.
I think a lot of them are doing some dodgy stuff on the side or something, only reason to be so menstrual about being on camera.
@@11274reece Honestly, it’s mostly just ignorance from my experience. They simply just don’t understand that public eye=the right to film. Once I explain establishing “a reasonable expectation of privacy” such as installing blinds or even solid perimeter fences that can’t be filmed through they usually understand a little better. But I’ve definitely had clients fly off the hinge at people recording before.
Legality of the action of filming has nothing to do with this bullshit. Instead of finding a productive place in life, these people point there cameras in hopes of a negative reaction. So one must ask themselves, why purposely set out to do things that they know will incite panic, annoy people and waste the time of law enforcement. Looking for trouble and finding it doesn’t make you a hero, it just makes you a dick.
@@captainspaulding4777 you could make a case that recording something going into it with that mindset has created most of youtubes content
Former security here. And yes, that was most definitely annoying. The main property I handled was split by a highway. So, yes, we owned both sides for about 1000-1500 feet from the highway, the highway itself are well as 10 feet to the sides are public/public use easement. And I had some... unique situations. From a guy stopped within the easement passed out drunk (parked vehicle, thankfully), to people lighting off fireworks in the easement, but less than 50 feet from some gas pumps.
Luckily, the property manager had full authority from the owners, and she ALWAYS sided with me. As such, any time I made a call, I never had to worry about being overruled by the property manager.
So when she asked my thoughts on a guy filming from the easement, I explained the law. And after that, she welcomed him onto the property and said he was allowed "anywhere a paying guest would be allowed, except within their room without their personal consent".
She was easily the best manager I've ever had, even if she wasn't my direct manager.
If it wasn’t for the camera it would’ve been his word against the cops. What a game changer!
Police seem to hate the truth.
That's why we need to be wary of any laws or suggestions that recording reality should be illegal or not eligible.
in the past where a diferent story
That's why he erased it. But why wasn't his cop cam on? Isn't that the norm now?
If it wasn’t for a camera and a tazer maybe this dude wouldn’t have tried to pick a fight with each and every individual he encountered. I also believe Mr Roberts had been harassing this business.
this is the type of dude who’s never been punched in the face but he definitely needs to be
Actively encouraging violence k
Check him at 18:35. He has a face that many would want to punch.
@@jarjarbinks4243 You're not that dense You must be a tool😊
Yeah, Americans are nuts. Over here, if someone did that, the cops would book him, beat the shit out of him and the court would throw out the case, camera footage or not. This is the definition of "asking for it".
The best comment by far 100%
The first two officers were honestly really nice and professional he didn’t need to be a dick to them. Third cop deserves a lawsuit though
Never was there a better case for "You're not wrong, you're just an asshole"
You are wrong. He was rated a B+, that means he was right and not an asshole.
@@patron7906 if you think he wasn't an asshole, I can't imagine how you are in public.
His immediate reaction after getting pushed and potentially assaulted is understandable. After that guy left and the others took over, whom were much more calm and attempted to deescalate, the guy continued to escalate and be an asshole. When the cop asked him to please not yell, so as to prevent a situation escalating, the guy proceeded to escalate further and, be an asshole.
@@patron7906you can be right and still an asshole. That's basically an auditor's job.
The dude abides
@@patron7906 that just means he knows what he was talking about... he's definitely an asshole though
That Sargent immediately decided he was so powerful that he could arrest someone for what he did. And retiring before being fired should still lose their pension. Also deleting info from someone's camera is a criminal offense. This guy who retired should be brought up on charges.
It's also destroying evidence. Wich i don't need to explain as to why it's a BIG NONO!
should but it will not happen. I wonder if he can file a civil suit?
Big problem that the sergeant was not charged!
Sergeant. Not Sargent.
Auditor was a cunt. Arresting cop was a cunt++. My grading system is way better than audit the audit
While the camera guy here was definitely in the right legally speaking, he also massively escalated that situation way past the point it needed to go.
It doesn’t matter. He’s a citizen it isn’t his job to de-escalate any situation and all the people he spoke to came up to him aggressively. Just because words they didn’t like were coming out of his mouth they were physically escalating.
@@Watts_that_behaviour you missed the entire point of Adam's comment. Yes, he was in the right legally speaking, Adam acknowledges that. He was also an asshole. A legal asshole. He went looking for trouble, knowing the law to carefully avoid breaking it, while goading other people to make them likely to break the law, which they did, and then gladly takes on the role of victim. It's the literal embodiment of "sophomoric" - a wise fool. That's like knowing ppl tend to run the red light at an intersection on a blind curve and going as slowly through it as you can with your green light repeatedly until someone hits you and then suing them. Legal. Still stupid and being an asshole and a good way to make your own community hate you.
How? He was walking and taking pictures. They escalated it by putting their hands on him. The cops were trying to put the blame on him, and when he wouldn't let them do that, they called in officer asshole to make it even worse. Had the dudes in the building minded their own business, none of this would have happened.
Why was he "auditing" a private company?? They don't have to uphold your 1st amendment or any other amendment rights. How stupid can you get.
That could be said every time a cop assaults someone. Every single time.
Here comes hubby to show his wife how brave he is
Most likable person here is probably the first cop who came and talked to the auditor. The auditor was picking fights and he knew it
Rite he put his hands on another person first. Thanks for showing your stupidity. Guess I can put my hands on you and you'll be OK with it. Liar
He was horny for views
My thoughts exactly
So what? He isn't on the job and representing the state
It's to expose the reaction. The way to not deal with the situations, also shows how cops deal with things and that is them dealing with it in violence. They don't care about people's life and future. But they think the people they deal with deserve it, it's just a circle of never ending violence, we humans can move past that instead of reply with "just whip his butt" you need to talk to people and change them, not physically assault them. Unless you are telling me that most humans are retorded and have revelations when they get their azz beat.
For someone that doesn't want his "face on that camera" he sure walked up to a camera awfully fast.
His male ego was challenged.
@@bentrinker1937 he was used to throwing his weight around🤣
@bentrinker1937 Male ego? Females can exhibit the same behavior. Don’t feed into the gender warefare narrative.
Have you ever noticed that the more someone says they don't want to be recorded, the closer they will get to the camera???
Clarence the puppet: "Do you see the contradiction?"
It's astonishing to me how many people attempt to solve problems by trying to force other people to alter their behavior, rather than altering their own.
That arrest was horrific, but boy oh boy was the auditor the most dreadful and unpleasant person I have ever seen.
Believe it or not, that’s actually the point. As a security officer of my own, these auditors act like that on purpose in the name of catching an officer slipping up. The only reason they shouldn’t be allowed to video record anything is if they are ON the private property. Otherwise it’s entirely legal and protected by the 1st amendment right
Auditors fulfill the function of a stress test for law enforcement. Stress tests are meant to push the boundaries to find failure points or demonstrate the resiliency of the police department.
@@reversefulfillment9189 I see your point but what does that have to do with screaming and crying to that random guy and calling him fat before the cops got there?
@EpicMailPotato He was in the middle of being harassed and pushed around, that will get your adrenaline up, I think we can give him a pass for getting angry about the situation. I'll agree that it wasn't very creative to state the obvious by calling him a fatty. We should all aspire to have more colorful quips and retorts in our repertoire for times like this.
@@reversefulfillment9189or they're looking to get rich off of tax dollars. I have a feeling not all of them are pure hearted patriots risking it all for the greater good. Just saying.
Why does that one deputy look like Dale Gribble posing as a sheriffs deputy?
Yeah he looked like he was incognito😂
So happy that he was able to recover that footage because if he wasn’t able to then that cop woulda gotten away with it
Pig did get away with it lmao, he was only "fired" (resigned instead of being actually fired). Not charged for either the illegal arrest/assault or deleting the video, lol. Watch that him still get some government paid benefits because he resigned instead of officially fired. It wouldnt be the first time a "fired" piggy still gets paid.
I wonder how he was able to recover it?
@@Blue-hf7xt when you delete stuff it is not actually deleted. The storage position is just removed from the storage look up table.
@@Blue-hf7xt Same as any hard drive data recovery, there are programs for it. Deleting data doesn't actually remove it from a HDD/SD card it just marks teh data as overwritable.
@@dwarfy2k264 thank you, kind of you to explain this to me. Thank God he knew how to retrieve it.
Keep in mind the cops do these things while they know they are being videoed. Imagine what they do when a camera is not filming.
They've always done this kinda shit and then they get the 3 other officers on scene to lie and support the main officer's story to cover it up. It's just that now it's harder for them to get away with it
I don't have to imagine 🤬
Imagine growing up in the 60s when there was absolutely no threat of police being recorded on cameras. And the added element of doing anything While Black.
Why do we need to imagine if we have a prime example right here? He was covering his tracks, deleting the evidence.
That is good point.
Dang, that cop who ended up arresting the guy was clearly trying to provoke a reaction so he _could_ arrest him. If someone is backing away from you, and you keep approaching them, that's a threat in any other situation.
The camera man was shit stirring. I'm not a cop so I'm not restricted to these laws. He is lucky to be in one piece. No time for idiots. Running around pretending to be lawyers with a taser? Piss off fuckwit
Nah it’s public space like he was saying so the cop don’t have to back away
Sure it's public property, but the officer was clearly trying to intimidate this guy, because he's a power hungry tyrant with a badge. Pretty obvious he was in the wrong considering he got fired
@@waynedieckmann9840 Not talking about that. I'm specifically talking about the cop at the end, who just kept walking forward at the guy while the guy was backing away. There was no taser involved in that interaction at all.
@@rhino9372 Lmao you have a picture of the hulk as your profile go finish grade school kid instead of wasting time trolling.
The last officer was cosplaying a spec ops soldier. Right when he showed up I knew he'd be the main villain. The chubby civilian could well have been an ex-cop.
If an officer is under investigation they should not be allowed to resign
I agree. Or still let them resign. But make sure the charge is still followed up
Why do they keep.allowing these assclowns to resign before they get their asses fired ,cancel that mess
@@joshuaherring9674 when they resign they keep all their benefits, if fired they lose them..
So if they resign they can't be charged, Keep benefits and could do so many crimes with a free pass? Why even have laws. Not a question but a statement! Go to school be a cop, be corrupt make cash break the law and resign. 5 star
@@mrt2124 and then they can just hop to a new department
If the sergeant did this, on camera, imagine his history of arrests.
His history and the culture that is built in that department with this pathetic leadership.
Imagine his family who must hate him absolutely
Wife beater
Imagine what he would do when there is No camera!!!!!!!!!!!!
Where did this piece of sh;t go to continue his police career?
Whether lawful or not if your arresting someone if it isn't announced before you begin arresting them any kind of struggle should never be considered resisting.
Thats what I was thinking. Its quite an automatic reflex to pull away from someone grabbing you. If the cop said 'turn around your under arrest', this at least would dull the automatic reflex.
Great breakdown on the auditor's behavior. The Sherif definitely deserves a gold star for conducting the investigation and the first two deputies get silver for patience. Firing a member of a public employee union is extremely difficult. In many cases a resignation is best to avoid reinstatement and backpay after an arbitrator decides in the employee's favor.
“Can I help you?”
“No, You can help us.”
This is the level of education this man is working with.
ROFL
He was standing there waiting for something to happen, I think he expected it because of previous events and just wanted to disturb
@@dries-pederjanse6249 sweet lord Jesus I feel sorry for you and your way of thinking. Please don’t breed. Do America a favor ☺️
In case you’re not understanding, as the camper said, this is a legit question:
how can someone with a camera cause someone to commit PHYSICAL VIOLENCE!?
Lol that’s literally what you are implying by your comment. Please. Just stop while you’re ahead.
Or keep going and give us all a laugh every time you say something. Your choice 😉
😂😂🤦🏽♂️ my brain did not even register that stupidity..
I've watched so many of these videos now. That what he said actually made sense to me 🤦🏽♂️
I agree
It's sad how they are allowed to escape punishment by resigning.
Apparently every single citizen can avoid being prosecuted for assault by simply quitting their job!!!
@@ianbattles7290only if you're in finance, a cop or a politician... Basically 3 careers that have the potential to ruin the most number of lives
Sue them civilly, the bar is extremely low in civil court.
The people should give them an award or a prize for this kind of service. Like a nice rope swing, courtesy of the tax payers.
Although I suspect punishment will be minimal, he hasn't escaped anything yet.
I put money on the fact that the Sergeant who was fired was the ‘husband’ when the first two workers yelled out “call 911, call your husband”. That would be why he went right up to the auditor trying to escalate things. His behaviour seemed personal to me.
absolutely , sad to see all these bootlickers in the comments blaming the free citizen who did nothing wrong .
@@jonathan-bk4gbabsolutely
Good call, I had forgotten about that.
@@jonathan-bk4gb I believe that cop should have been fired, hell, he should have been arrested, but that citizen is a douche bag and if he had gotten his skull cracked, it would have been poetic justice, nut justice justice, but poetic for sure.
that's exactly what i thought. he wanted to act like a badass in front of her work friends and he ended up looking like a total fuckup
“Can I help you? No can you help us!” lol wtf
What’s sad is the fact that when these officers are fired, they just get hired on by another department. Smh.
And probably working the very next day. The unions usually work fast to keep them in the blue or brown.
Yep. Just move him from the area.
Guy need to press assault charges on the cop. He used his badge to punish an innocent man
Because he was allowed to resign
But he wasn’t fired. He resigned for personal reasons so just gets recycled in the system with a huge grudge. They should fire him and he should be barred from LEO work
This is one of those situations where I’m unhappy with every single party involved. Absolute chaos fueled by every person involved.
Agreed. I just don't understand these auditors auditing the general public. Audit the police not random people. It's embarrassing.
@@quinlanhogan3072 The auditor was crass off the bat. He really has a "sovereign citizen" vibe and those people, in my experience, are just "holier than thou" assholes. No actual credibility, but a nuisance.
Same. All of them sucked
Yea I tend to hate these ‘auditors’ because they seem to exist to provoke people into altercations. Which I guess is the whole point of it but it’s so annoying to watch sometime
@@henryojeda2890 that’s all they’re about. Now an unplanned traffic stop that wasn’t instigated by the auditor, that’s good work. But these auditors harassing the public under the guise of “journalism?” Those people suck so much. 90% of these people can’t even spell journalism. Losers.
If any normal person tried to delete that, they would go to prison for evidence tempering. They need to be held to the same laws they "protect"
Tampering*
Gotta find a way to prove it though. He only said the officer did it. I'm inclined to believe it, but that won't do any good.
💯
@@RemedieXPretty easy to prove. Officer confiscated camera and it was deleted in that officers possession. They have very specific procedures to follow involving evidence.
Oh but you know how it works. They investigate themselves and find they did nothing wrong just like the Government =)
How is it possible that a police officer can delete their own body cam evidence?
That's not what happened. The officer deleted the audtor's footage.
Pretty generous to give the auditor a B+, his behavior was escalatory almost the entire time
He always holds rude, escalating, aggressive auditors to a low behavioral standard.
That is my main issue with this channel. The auditors never lose points no matter how awful they are. This guy may have been the worst I have seen.
a few minutes in and Id already give the guy an F for being an annoying piece of shit non stop insulting always aggressive and reaaally trying to have this immediatly escalated to have cops called.
I agree the auditor should have gotten a lower grade. I feel he was baiting and rude. BUT that cop was trying to intimidate by walking up on the auditor. AND by trying to erase the video. Also he WASN'T immediately fired but allowed to resign. I bet he gets a job in another town.🤔
Escalation or not... they are armed, often abuse their authority and damn sure ought to know the laws they are expected to enforce.
Dude was 100% told to resign and was referred to another department. Nothing comes from these incidents besides the officer having to pack up and move on to the next community to terrorize. The united states courts need to take these incidents much more seriously and treat police officers like this one with the same swift justice they enforce on every other tax paying citizen. That is the ONLY way we get the bad eggs out for good.
And such internal investigations need to be open the the public so everyone can see exactly how the individuals involved reached their conclusions. None of this "no evidence of wrongdoing was found" should be allowed unless the investigation was clearly done properly and a subject of record.
Depends on the state , for example in the tyre Nichols case all 5 officers lost their police officers state certification.
Police officers should be held to a higher standard than ordinary citizens. They are entrusted with representing the government and carrying out their responsibilities with professionalism.
@@davepirtle9790 couldn't they just go to another state? Genuine question
Tyler King, Very well said and an excellent point. I agree 💯% and I very much appreciate the civility you said it with. So many people today either get belligerent or violent whether they are right or wrong, both in the video and in many of these comments. But as shown in the video the guy was within his rights but his disgusting mouth and not letting the deputies do their job, is probably the reason they called for the Sargent.
Again, excellent comment my friend.
"Arrested for resisting arrest." This charge should not be allowed to stand alone. Always love this one. Imagine if you were sent to jail for being sent to jail or shot for being shot.
Circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works because circular logic works...
The reason it is, is because police can detain you for suspicion of a crime, and you have to comply with that. If you resist a lawful detention, even if the investigation clears you of other charges, you still committed a crime by resisting.
@@AceRasputin yet their oath says they aren't cops at that moment, and their own spells clearly articulate our freedoms in "neutralizing" blatant criminals/terrorists... seems quite cut and dry for some "swift justice"
@@BlackFedoraMan
@@AceRasputin yea but the crime has to be a specific crime. They can’t detain you for general suspicion which they try to do all the time
The victim was a victim before anything even happened.
Only in his own mind!
I have to agree, he's a pathetic auditor, very unprofessional of him, his free speech was mean spirited...
@@julialibor9341 "His free speech was mean spiritted" See the thing about these Rights is they don't magically go away if you're a prick. You still get to have those rights. Being insufferable doesn't remove those rights from you. Disliking someone or how they're presenting something doesn't invalidate what they're saying or the points they make. You might think it's justified but the law doesn't care about moral justification.
I have a question: Why are police able to delete body cam footage???
That seems like an extremely bad system.
They were not in this case. They also tried unsuccessfully to delete the auditor's phone and lied on police reports.
@@joeblow2069 And he STILL didn't get fired. They allowed him to resign. Cops investigating their friends and letting their friends off easy, no charges.
@@henrytawnn8694
How would they prevent him from resigning?
@@JD-xz1mx By firing him for his criminal actions. If that happened, he would be liable to be sued, and he might spend some prison time for his criminal actions.
Instead, he gets to resign with benefits, no jail time, because his buddies didn't want him to get in trouble.
@@henrytawnn8694 If every meeting where someone has the same people where someone gets fired in the room, and you walk into the room and they ask if there is anything you want to say before you get started. You both save face and keep the trend going of being able to move to a neighboring county without any formal repercussions.
That said too, if you have 20 years of service and make one mistake - the issue was not that you made one mistake, it was that you let it be a public one. Policing is a very unforgiving when dealing with shows of force against unarmed citizens.
That's scary the cops can just destroy your evidence with no consequences
This is why people are acab to give someone this much power is insane they can kill someone and just get Fired
@Salty Pureblood what
@@skermelig what is acab 😂
@@ICLight412 all cops are bastards
@@ICLight412 all cops are bad the dumb pretentious belief system
"go call your husband, fat boy" made me laugh out loud. take me back to seventh grade
It's heartwarming to see those who never had friends in high school (or after) have found a purpose in life.
>they never had friends
You never been to highschool the biggest spastics had friends. I wish i got that uppity girl. She seemed alright. But when she tripped oh man....
youtube gold, most under appreciated comment.
Yeah, they become unprofessional auditors.
Yes I’m glad they found the police force.
Yup. Getting back at the world because they've been so mistreated.
I think its important to recall that at 03:15 the employees said "Call your husband", which ends up being the cop that took him down and arrested him. I bet that cop is on a new department now. Maybe even a lateral move as Sgt.
Yep. He’s still working as a K-9 somewhere
Oh that should have been pointed out in the video.
Exactly! He obviously showed up already mad, and had chosen a side. His wife probably called and told him some bs. So he showed up to try and intimidate dude, and then assaulted him. He should have been charged.
@@swakks disgusting!
This is fault of judges and police chiefs who allowed this kind atitudes like they normal against citizens who should be protect !! This is so like dictators regimes polices,that is sad to see it without rage and frustration for you, how could this happen even when they know they are on camera!?!? Cities shouldnt allow this kind of atitudes being payed for all when should be the police officer who pay when crimes being commited by the the LAW OFFICERS!
The sheriff's office should be filing criminal charges against that deputy for any assault and tampering with evidence. Resigning should not alleviate you from the consequences of your actions. But you know they protect their own so he'll probably just move to another law enforcement job.
TH-cam channels lose credibility when they put the word "fired" on the thumbnail, when the actual word should have been "resigned."
I can't help but notice that in, most situations like this, when the person tells them "I have it all on camera", the cops almost NEVER actually asked to see the video. You'd think that would be one of the first things they'd want to see.
I got pulled over for running a stop sign by a rookie cop on her first day, and as soon as I pointed to the display in my Tesla and offered to look at the video, that ticket turned into a "warning". 🙂 I knew I had stopped at the stop sign - it was maybe a 2 second stop, but then there's nothing in the law which specifies how long a car has to be motionless.
To be fair, many laws and policing policies are out of date around the ability for nearly everything to record video now days (cameras, cellphones, dashcams, even cars themselves like Tesla). There should be mandatory training on video laws and best practices - to your point of actually viewing the video and lawfully obtaining a copy of it- for all law enforcement and best practice for security guard companies.
After viewing the video in this case, the officers should have arrested the assaulting man in this and the scenario would have never been enough of an issue for this video. Simple assault of a citizen.
They're not detectives 😂
@@murrijuana2842 You're right, they aren't, but part of basic police work is to gather or preserve evidence and use evidence to determine what if any crimes had been committed, seems like they didn't do either in this case.
@@murrijuana2842 they showed up,they are asking questions,making decisions which affect people's lives,
This was a Sgt. Imagine how he's been dealing with people over his entire career. There's something called the Peter Principle, which is an observation that the tendency in most organizational hierarchies is for every employee to rise in the hierarchy through promotion until they reach a level of respective incompetence. Once hired, each officer rises through the ranks over their career until they reach this point.
Yes, this makes perfect logical sense. There are cultural norms in all organizations and what is normal for one is likely normal for the others. You can see the attitude on the ginger cop who first approached him too.
There is still incompetence in that department to work
@@hautemama85 The other cop hasn't been indoctrined enough yet to "learn" the attitude. He still seemed "somewhat" decent.
most of them reached that point when they were allowed into the academy
Hello, I think you are close but not quite right, my understanding of the Perter Principle is that you rise ONE level above what you are competent at. So the Sgt would be a good constable ( seeing this video I doubt he was a good fit at that level ) but a hopeless Sgt.
The camera guy is the type of guy to dare a guy to punch him in the face then call the cops 😂😂😂
Yep!
And get a bag 💰 for it :)
And your like the type to let this ruin your day, like tubby in the video
And your the type of guy just dumb enough to do it.
@@JR-wu8dc no day ruins here. You guys think your so smart tho. Had to let you know. It’s ok it isn’t easy acting like America isn’t America. Just know these people MAKE the comfort in which you reside
Mr.Roberts needs to get a D+.
He passed the class. But no one wants to come to his graduation party.
The amount of research you do is incredible. It makes me cringe because it reminds me of the research I had to do for my thesis--but that was for one thesis. You do this research for every video you put up. I don't know if I should commend you or worry about you. Thanks for doing it.
The ad revenue from a 2 million plus subscribers channel makes the research worth it...
Many times, a criminal case has been heard in court and the laws by the prosecution and defense would be available in motions. If a civil suit was filed, it would have the laws/case law noted in the suit.
@@ircjesselee they actually get demonetized often & TH-cam doesn’t pay as well as people tend to believe.
@@Brieyonce nice hat.
@@Brieyonce Huh? 100k views get you about $375 - $1000, this video alone would have given him $2250 - $6000, that's a lot of money if you ask me...
They let him resign. That is tantamount to approval of his actions. They acknowledge that his behavior makes them look bad, but they proactively chose to do as much as they possibly could to help an officer who assaulted and illegally arrested someone and then deleted evidence to cover up his crime.
Allowing a man like that to resign means the people who run that department are themselves like that.
They shouldn't be allowed to know eachother at all.
nothing changes until... wait you smell that? Smoked bacon cooked at .45
Sgt. Morrison was given the opportunity to resign instead of fired, so he can now go work for another Law Enforcement Agency and continue with his tyrannical behavior.
Deleting footage (destroying evidence) should come with a mandatory 10 year prison sentence and a $20,000 fine when you swear an oath and decide to break it.
And they should never be allowed to be an officer again.
Cry
@@Itssblu You take that boot all the way down don't you.
It should come with whatever penalty conviction for such has attached, provided such comes to pass. Without no criminal penalty is merited.
@@praisethesun6078 Perhaps, but that runs contrary to one's debt to society being cleared once punishment is concluded. A permanent constraint of that nature should be sparingly applied if that sentiment is indeed meant to predominantly be a value we hold.
narcissist's love to claim they were the victims, and call the police. And the property is public. there is a public road, there is a mailbox, fire hydrants, gas lines, etc. Even a property marker, 20 feet from the road.
Imagine how much dirt he’s deleted & covered up over the years
No need to imagine. It's all facts.
Never tell the cop about what you got on camera if they’re doing this, they’ll probably try deleting it. That’s for your lawyer.
I've seen cops deleted videos of their own misbehavior. However, with cloud backup these days, cops are digging their own grave.
That's why you STREAM your videos...
Can't delete the cloud
@@the_algorithm Yes Sir 💪👍. Its a must. Everyone should have a body cam these days. The maniacs on the loose warrant such a thing.
You shouldn't be using big cameras...and your footage should be saved to the cloud as it's being recorded... luckily this guy didn't have his evidence destroyed...there are much better ways to ensure your footage can't be destroyed by criminal police.
@@GSP-76 The fact that they tried and failed makes the bulky equipment worth it. If there's a way to attack a microdevice to a bigger one, that may actually make for perfect bait...
Camera guy is definitely out looking for lawsuits instead of getting a job. Insulted and escalated the situation every chance he got.
Let's face it... he wouldn't succeed in lawsuits if cops behaved themselves.
Let's face it. Dude was a sjw looking for trouble. That's why he carried a damn taser.
@RobJo He has the same mindframe like some of the people abusing the welfare system popping out more kids they can't support so they can get $500+ a kid from the hardworking tax payers each month. He's just out looking for lawsuits instead of women to knock up. I've seen these types of videos before but a lot of the time the cameraman is respectful and more doing it for a learning experience for police that don't know the entirety of the laws they are required to abide by and enforce. This cameraman, however was just a douche trying to break some eggs to find some broken eggs. He isn't for bettering society. He isn't for educating the public or LEO's. He's looking for a nice check from the taxpayers. I don't know how anyone can respect that, but you already know who he is calling if he is ever in an emergency.
@@xJay28x I don't disagree with anything you say, all makes sense.. but I believe my point stands, if you don't abuse your power then the system wouldn't have to pay out lawsuits regardless which idiot is trying to get one.
@RobJo I agree with you, but there are always going to be bad apples. Whether it's race, religion, or profession, there are always going to be bad ones that give the good ones a bad name. I'm a firm believer in more screening for the police, body cameras, as well as periodic mental fitness evaluations. They deal with a lot of things the majority of society won't ever see. What I think should change though is that instead of the city forking over money for lawsuits on the police that can't maintain their composure like the last cop in the video, the money should come out of their pension or at the bare minimum have a waiver/morality clause in their employment contract that relieves the department from responsibility of the police officers actions if they go off the book or abuse their power, and places the financial burden on the police officer him/herself.
" call your husband" how much you want to bet that last man was the employees husband? That's got to be some kind of corruption charge.
Agreed, he lost most of his credibility by being so confrontational and just plain rude. The first two cops were reasonable, the senior one was a terrible example for his junior officers.
I know that guy was being very rude as soon as he had his first interaction had happened
So what if he was rude? They threatened and then did arrest him over bullshit. Fuck them
I think it is obvious that he was spoiling for a fight. The point is to exercise rights, not taunt people and make an ass out of yourself. That sets the cause back.
Yeah this grading the first two officers a C and the clown a B+ when neither side did anything legally wrong. Clown gets a B+ for trying to start a fight and the cops get a C for not kissing his ass? Fucking asinine.
I've lost some respect for Audit the Audit with him giving this dude a B+ and the first officers a C. I think both officers and the videographer could have handled it better and both groups were equally right/wrong about the laws. The sergeant needs to be as far away as possible from any position of authority, I wouldn't trust him to round up carts at the grocery store.
These cops that commit offences then resign should not be able to even get a job as a security officer at Walmart or any state in the USA.
Sadly, they end up in another county’s / towns office
I have to say the workers who came up on him were more aggressive at least I thougjt...
Amen
In other countries they would be charged with an offence and they would never work in the field again.
I believe there should be a database both on the state and national level for any officer who has been fired or resigned in an attempt to avoid being fired. Further, along that same vein, I believe there should be a national database for anyone convicted of child or elder abuse.
the auditor seems like such a nice guy, very friendly. im sure he has lots of friends
Tall homie: "Who're you with?"
Auditor (sounding a little tearful and frustrated): "I'm with myself!"
Truth.
Filming in public is just so creepy. No one likes some random camera pointed in their direction and he was doing it to prove a point that he CAN do it. The problem is, not one wants to watch a video of someone taking a video of a building. They WILL watch a video that ends up like this for enjoyment purposes only. You can tell he HOPES that something like this will happen so he can sue and get some money to pay for a better camera.
No such thing as friends, only problems! 🤣
Yea, his camera. What a goof omg!!! 🤪
@@VarthDador while I agree he was an antagonizing moron, there’s also no law stating you can assault and arrest someone because you find them annoying
1:01 “can I help you?” “No, can we… can you help us?”
This last cop is insane, he escalated a completely descanted situation.
What is discanted?
@@Dogmeat_donnie It's not an actual word. I'm sure he meant the cop unnecessarily escalated the situation.
@@shannonbayley3684 I think he meant deescalated retard
@@shannonbayley3684 It is a word. It means "talked about at length already". That said he probably just got autocorrected trying to say de-escalated. Still, both words fit fine.
You can tell he was the husband they were referring to call, so he was obviously trying to impress them.
Problem is the cop tried to grab him BEFORE telling him he's "under arrest." Until they say it, they're just attacking you and you have a right to defend yourself.
Exactly....likewise I don't agree with ATA giving the other 2 cops a C grade....it would have been a C if nothing else happened....cops that stand by and do NOTHING while one of their blue line gang buddies acts the way he did....in my opinion....are just as guilty.....and showing how they all stick together....allowing the cop to "resign"...is BS... he'll just show up in another department some time down the road....if they took this stuff seriously, that cop would be fired and never be able to be law enforcement again.
"Hey man I don't wanna be filmed, turn that off"
_Walks up to the camera and directly stares at it_
lmao
The way the Sargent looked down while approaching the him while saying whats wrong was a visible cue, probably to cleverly mask his intent
Respect to the second cop brother for keeping his cool and brushing off the cameraman's aggressive comments without batting an eye
He unlawfully arrested the guy 😂
@@expohshappyhour1460 that would be the third cop buddy
@@jginny ohhhhhhh you’re right my fault pimp
That's the cure for all this. COMPLETELY ignore these people. Then all they're left with is boring videos of nothing, nobody will watch them and POOF, gone🤷♂️
When someone's a little bitch and they got no gun they aren't worth ya time.
The fired cop probably went down the road to the next town/county and got on with the PD or Sheriff's office. These guys are rarely held accountable and their criminality is usually swept under the rug.
Small but important distinction. This cop should've been fired, but he was allowed to resign. Probably helps with respect to pension and benefits.
That is why many police and sheriffs departments have changed many rules on where they live now. In the past you had to live in the city or county where you worked.
Because that makes it easier for the complainant to win a lawsuit against the city. That one Sheriff in Florida is probably the only LEO in the US that acts in a serve and protect manner in the public.
He went right to Darlington the next town over they're all trash .
What I don’t get he wasn’t under arrest and he was tackled. Shouldn’t he be going to jail for assault? If I just randomly start tackling people on the street I would go to jail.
This camera man definitely trying to get some people mad and sue them, he know what he's doing...
knows...he knows what he's doing
@@1994DjK I do
Yes and unfortunately within his rights no matter how insufferable and the cop who broke his rights is of the same cloth
To be clear Florence and the Horry County PD are always in a battle as to who is the least knowledgeable or professional agency. So this isn't rare or surprising.
MB used to have a pretty good dept, but it's definitely gone downhill. Some are alright, but too many are new to SC & downright rude Yankees. ✌️
He wasn't fired, he resigned so he can now work in a police department near you
The whole title of this video is misleading. Doesn't seem like he was "IMMEDIATELY" fired to me. Click bait alert!
And collect his pension
100 MILES WOULD BE TOO CLOSE.
And receive pension and benefits
Good to see that the boys in blue are taking the Catholic approach, you know reassign the “problem” somewhere else, namely under the rug.
When the only charge is "resisting arrest," you know the cops are out of control.
Agreed, resisting arrest for what crimes?
It’s the catch-all phrase they like to hide behind while they know they’re violating civil rights.
If you resist an unlawful detention in Texas it's a "crime". It's bullshit.
The Sargent is a punk motherfuxer who got away with it. Let that sink in.
@@DGZGSGEGIGKG Disturbing the peace and Obstruction is the two utilized in my state by out of control LEOs to arrest those who don’t submit or they just don’t like.
I love these audits but I cringe sometimes when the people are just overly rude for no reason.
Super off putting like the cameraman might not be legally in the wrong, but deserves to get his ass beat
I agree its pretty cringey and causing escalation doesn't help anyone. It makes the auditor look just as bad as the out of line officers.
I agree. But it's designed to be a stress test. Put them through the worst so you feel confident they act reasonably all other times. We should be giving them kudos if they handle the situations well. Sadly we don't often get to see those cases
@humberto alvarez fine line for sure.
I think it’s one of those things where you live and you learn. The guy who got arrested is young and hasn’t learned how to behave in situations like this. You gotta grease those wheels, not act like a cocky shit. Though he should not have been arrested, he also should not have expected the officers to be very sympathetic to his situation considering his attitude and behavior.
The SGT was the "husband" requested to be called
He escalates, assaulted and arrested unlawfully, lies and gets to go free, retire and collect a pension, unreal!
Do people normally lose their pension when they retire? I'm pretty sure that would be atypical.
@@kevinarnold8634 No, but normally people get punished when they break the law
@@kevinarnold8634 it's is not as uncommon for officers. That is a very real potential trial for an officer of the law.
usually you only get a pension when you work somewhere long enough, more than likely he just moved districts and now works in a different office. Stop smoking crack mate, you should use critical thinking more
@Kevin Arnold, you must be one of them.
It never ceases to amaze me that people think they have the right to put their hands on strangers when upset.
It's because of weak policing as this demonstrates.
Weak parenting to put it better
Beware of busy in their mind tubby goofs , they are everywhere.
If u scream at me and stick a phone in my personal space your getting pushed ….. wasn’t that big of a deal
@@charlesruss1771 Beware of busy in their mind tubby goofs , they are everywhere.
I'm guessing Sgt Morrison is the "husband" in the "go call your husband" statement. The fact that he responded to the scene simply because his wife works there and escalated situation after it was already settled is just more reason for him to be charged.
This is the comment I was looking for. That is definitely how it appears.
I would be willing to bet that his wife is named Karen
Apparently Sgt Morrison suffers from Will Smith Syndrome
Allowing him to quit is completely different from being fired.
I haven’t finished the video yet and I’m sure there is a bad cop who does a bad thing but right now the guy doing the initial filming is a huge problem. He’s being combative and it’s like he’s doing this specifically to get a rise out of someone hoping they’ll put hands on so he can call foul. No one should touch another person like that but he was only escalating the situation.
that’s literally his job title lmao
@@DBRhunt his job is to be a twat?
@@DBRhunt most of these people don't seem to know what a audit and people who inspect companies.
@Hvymtal job lol. its not a real job. these goofs just go around trying to sue people.
Yep he’s putting people to the test. Be a decent calm person and you will pass that text every time.
bro didn’t have to be an asshole the WHOLE time though.
why are you against freedom
if you like the Ronnie’s comment YOU SOFT AS HELL
True he didn't have to but he had right to act the way he did just like you have the right to call him an asshole but dude you didn't have to in fact all this verbiage is irrelevant to the bottom-line the story can't disagree with that I don't think😮
I agree, but what I'm curious about is why did they feel the need to come all the way out there? If they thought he was casing the joint on private property, they shouldn't have confronted him themselves, they should have called the cops.
However, I agree that he's needlessly escalating the situation by being the world's biggest jackass
@@deusvult8251 He’s just against assholes, not freedom.
He's a Sgt.?! Imagine how much he's gotten away with his precious ranks
I remember this. These cops are out of control especially in the South! The only difference is that the guy would've been a minority...he probably would've been unalived 😢
the "victim" also pisses me off because he is clearly and intentional searching for a struggle, provoking actions.
Exactly
its almost like thats his constitutional right
@@Perichron it's almost like just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.
@@matthewr3986the employee didn't have to force himself into the light and grab the camera.
@@ElderAleks don't disagree with that
This right here is exactly why the public has lost all respect and trust for law enforcement. They’ve turned into SUCH BULLIES that they believe they have to SLAM THEM TO GROUND, DOING GREAT PHYSICAL HARM IN MOST CASES. They also right away start screaming “Don’t resist”, no matter what the person is doing, they use ANY excuse for physical abuse. It’s so disgusting, coupled with that smart ass mouthing..
In a lot of 3rd party videos of people being subjected to excessive force arrests while not resisting, the police scream "STOP RESISTING"
And to think we used to call them “Americas Finest” Now they are nothing more than the boils on the ass of society!
Forreal it's s wild how they don't seem to know their actual job smh, I don't care how annoying someone maybe, it's not illegal, they just seem to want to arrest anyone they don't like.
cop thugs, police depts Do Not Want Our respect. cops see citizens as inferior to their king/government/police unions.
So you'll trash ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT, on this planet for the 5-600 shit ass cops across the planet, gee, wonder what you would say if someone blamed ALL your race or religion or culture or profession, ALL OF EM, for some shit that less than 2% of said race, culture, religion etc. Was responsible for, would really like to see your response to that if it was thrown your way!!!
The way that third cop just walked up him and then arrested him took me way off guard. Wasnt expecting that at all
He did what needed to be done 😂
@@Brandyyyyy it was kinda funny but dang lmao
It was soooooo satisfying seeing this guy get taken to the ground like that, lol. Just as satisfying as knowing that the cop "resigned". Both of these people are insufferable.
@@diggles7015 it was satisfying I hate people who are just rude and disrespectful and instigate stupid situations. He cried like a little bi--h when he got tackled *HELP* LMAO
@@Brandyyyyy The camera guy is a prick but that cop was way out of line. He just kept walking up to him and was asked to back off and continued. He was arrested for not wanting a cop to stand 6 inches from his face and for backing away.
Dudes a professional antagonist 🤣
That cop is not at that department but he's probably at another. With a spotless record. This whole thing turns my stomach.
Nah I’m with that officer on this 1. That citizen is an asshole and that officer knew, it’s unfortunate that he had to resign but at least his record is not tarnished, personally I got very happy when he arrested that dude
@@andranikpapazyan3150 you're commenting on the wrong side of youtube, fella
@@andranikpapazyan3150 bro, what? Being an asshole isn't a crime and to arrest someone they need to have committed a crime. Deleting evidence after the fact is not a good trait for a cop to possess.
@@andranikpapazyan3150 Anyone can be an "asshole", it is not illegal nor a crime. The cop was allowed to resign, but probably should have been charged. And hatred of someone doesn't mean that person should be arrested, assaulted or abused or had property destroyed, as in the case of that now unemployed cop.
@@andranikpapazyan3150 classic pig lover this isn't communist Russia buddy we got rights here