Paul:Undeniable Biblical Proof He's A False Apostle

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2025
  • Biblical proof Paul is a false apostle: A close look at documented history surrounding Pharisee Saul, prior to his appointment by Jesus to an apostleship in Acts 9:15. This information leaves one wondering if Paul could truly be an apostle appointed by Jesus, or through the Grace of God.
    LINKS
    For further information, please go to: dld.bz/Cymh;
    Roman Emperor Constantine's Evil Influence on Christianity: dld.bz/aBMVK
    OT Proves Crucial Doctine Jesus Preached NOT in the NT: dld.bz/bS94j;
    Gospel of the Holy Twelve: dld.bz/bZmUA;
    The Clementine Homilies: dld.bz/bZmUT
    God Bless.

ความคิดเห็น • 516

  • @clarkewi
    @clarkewi 11 ปีที่แล้ว +179

    In the Book of Romans Paul tells Christians to obey Rome. Can you imagine, telling the followers of Jesus to follow those who crucified him?

  • @mattmcgrath2612
    @mattmcgrath2612 11 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    I did a 60-page paper on much of the same information here, and there is another question that we need to ask about Paul. If Paul is clearly a false apostle, then we should also be willing to discard doctrines that come from his pen. For example, the idea that Jesus was a sacrifice for our sins ONLY comes from Paul. No other prophet or apostle taught that. That the law is somehow contrary to grace comes ONLY from Paul. A Father's grace comes from obedience to His rules - in this case, Torah.

  • @pammyrogers
    @pammyrogers 11 ปีที่แล้ว +158

    I have recently (was a hard pill to swallow) come to the same conclusions about Paul. Do your own research people. After coming to this conclusion about Paul's writings, I have had to find out how YHVH could have allowed our present Protestant Bible to be so corrupted. It is very clear there are many inspired writings that were left out of the Bible. Research just how our 66 book Bible was canonized and made, the decisions to keep and leave out certain books. Why does Jesus and his other apostles refer to other books and yet they are not included? Obviously, people back then knew about them but we don't have them. This is a huge deception as part of Satan's plan for our end times. YHVH has given satan a lot of latitude for this deception. Most Christians are lazy and just want to parrot what their ignorant pastors tell them. It's a "narrow path", few will walk down it.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Thank you for your comment Pammy. Not only have Books been eliminated, there are three resources that prove beyond doubt that God’s Word and His Son’s Doctrine have been severely tampered with by men to suit their needs and traditions. I have included links to resources in the description section of this video, and I’ll share an example of severe tampering: Jesus said He'd end the blood sacrifice, yet it's not in the NT. Check Isaiah 1:4 & 11-13 & Jeremiah 7:22 & Daniel 8:11 & 9:27 vs Exodus 24:4 & 7-8. Also, check my dot com site: RodCDavis for complete information. God Bless.

    • @vicachcoup
      @vicachcoup 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Nice video on YT called
      50 books were left out of the Bible, here's why
      Also do a search on Bart Ehrman to learn more about problems with the current Bible.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thank you for sharing. God Bless.

  • @Axiom2rue
    @Axiom2rue 12 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Luk 23:42 And he said to Jesus, Lord, remember me when You come into Your kingdom.
    Luk 23:43 And Jesus said to him, Truly I say to you, Today you shall be with Me in Paradise.
    Question: On what basis was the thief justified? Was it by faith in Jesus or by the works of the Law?

  • @shawnlyons3413
    @shawnlyons3413 7 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    It has bugged me for a long time now that there are supposed doctrines in the bi.Baal that contradict the teachings of the Messiah. It's always bothered me that there are 66 books only included. My mind is hurting and there are things I need answers to and here I stand turning to a comment section instead of where I know I should seek.
    However, since the discussion stands allow me to call this fellowship.
    How do I achieve salvation if not of grace? I no longer accept the writings of Paul the betrayer the 13th apostle of death. But then, if Christ death upon the cross was not to cover over my sins and do for me what I cannot seem to do for myself does this make me without hope? For I have sinned and sought forgiveness and repentance only to find myself falling short of the very same sins again. I had a dream the other night and I said out loud, Christianity is the trap. It is the wide path clearly for many are walking it. How does this all calculate. Do you have these things figured out? Are you therefore without sin yourself? Or are you instructing me from the very same bench seat I'm damned from?

  • @randysimms2849
    @randysimms2849 11 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    We do not worship Paul or Peter, end of argument.

  • @inongemarysimakumba3587
    @inongemarysimakumba3587 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Why is it that most of your quotes are not from the Bible itself? What about the forgiving nature of God? What about the sin of David, the adultery Solomon? What about Moses' sin? What about the prostitute? If you can debunk Paul; using other Bible prophecies CONVINCINGLY then I will believe you! The entire word of God is good! Just because Saul was evil, just because it doesn't agree with your human nature, doesn't mean you're right. Jesus forgave Saul for his sins and appointed him apostle to show us that even the worst of sinners can be used to do God's work. DON'T misinterpret the Bible like that again.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Inonge Mary Simakumba, thank you for your comments. My mission is not to share that which is truly of God and Jesus, but to teach people the lies of men that are being taught in Their Names. I encourage you to intensely study with an unbiased mind Jesus’ true Gospel that I quote, the Gospel of the Holy Twelve: www.rodcdavis.com/Cause---GH12.html, and to verify its authenticity, I urge you to also intensely study with an unbiased mind, The Clementine Homilies, which contains a record of the lessons Apostle Peter preached. If you choose to do so, you will find the messages of the lessons contained in it, mirror the messages of the lessons within the Gospel of the Holy Twelve: www.rodcdavis.com/Cause---The-Clementine-Homilies.html.
      Biblical evidence totally supports the severe corruption I address that is within the Bible, and it reveals those directly responsible…all is documented in this writing, totally supported by numerous referenced biblical resources: The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God - dld.bz/AmazonFacts
      The explosive accounting above, ordained by God as a Bible study guide, and confirmed by Him through 3 physical signs, methodically reveals through referenced biblical resources, the fact that changes were made by men to His Word, to suit their needs and traditions. It also brings to light certain doctrine crucial to salvation that's not in the New Testament, which Jesus had given in fulfillment of the Jeremiah 31:31 prophecy: Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel. Following is a link to a sample Bible Study Lesson: dld.bz/BibleStudyGuide
      Jesus, as did Prophets before Him, preached against certain revered Hebrew Laws of Genesis and Exodus. However, as I mentioned, due to the co-conspiring between the previously identified parties in 325 AD, none of the doctrine Jesus preached that contradicted revered Hebrew Law, is found within the New Testament.
      I pray you take the initiative to intensely study with a discerning and unbiased mind, that which I have shared.
      God Bless

    • @inongemarysimakumba3587
      @inongemarysimakumba3587 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Rod C. Davis I left my church for contradicting the Bible. I'm not going to listen to you based on some extra biblical text you found. If you want me to believe you, give me sound BIBLICAL proof.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sister in Christ, this venue does not allow me to properly respond. Please send an email to me through my website, RodCDavis.com - the button to do so is at the bottom of the page. I will then be happy to provide you with the verifiable documentation you asked for. Peace and love in Christ Jesus Name.

  • @wayner8640
    @wayner8640 12 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You've made some interesting points. Usually, the complaint against Paul is that he did away with the law, basically due to the circumcision issue, yet in Acts 15 we see it was James who announced that a letter would be drafted and given to Paul that only four basic rules would be required of the gentiles rather than the laws of Moses. You mentioned Jer. 31 as predicting “new laws”, but it specifically mentions “new covenant” (31-36) and defines it: "I'll put my “Torah” within them - CONT

  • @SincerelyFaith545
    @SincerelyFaith545 8 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    This is absolutely ridiculous, if your going to say that apostle Paul is a false teacher then you might as well denounce the whole bible as being the word of God. There is no teachings in the bible that proves Paul as a false teacher, that doesn't even make since. The issue here is that you guys are looking at Paul as though he is trying to take the place of Christ but clearly in scripture Paul gives all glory to Christ he said himself, he said follow me as I follow Christ. Here is some scriptures you should try reading and none of them were wrote by Paul. Jesus did die for the sins of the whole world, He did become a sacrifice/offering for sin, and Salvation is for the gentiles as well. Here are some scriptures to look into. 1 peter 3:18, 1 john 2:2, Isaiah 56, Isaiah 19, and mark 15:40. I pray that the Lord will open up your eyes and remove the scales. You cant say some of the bible is true you have to believe its entirety. Just like you cant believe some of God is true you have to believe Father, Son, and Holy spirit and Jesus is the word therefore the bible is true. Leviticus 17:11 tell us that Blood makes atonement for our sins. So with that being said Christ blood made atonement for us. He laid down his own life for us, He sacrificed himself so that you and I might be saved.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Amanda Modisett, I have read and heard your defenses so very many times since 2008. The New Testament is severely corrupted, as is the Old Testament, and this writing proves that fact way beyond doubt, ‘The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God.’ This is a link to an overview of it, and I pray, for your own spiritual wellbeing, that you choose to intensely study it with a discerning and unbiased mind: www.rodcdavis.com/Sample-Chapters---The-Miracle-of-Three-Physical-Signs.html
      Once you have intensely studied it with a discerning and unbiased mind, you will know beyond doubt all the lies you have been taught, which you believe to be truths.
      And this is a link to a short video that makes obvious the deceit placed by men into the King James and Catholic Bibles: th-cam.com/video/CWjlSRAJx2E/w-d-xo.html
      Amanda Modisett, please keep this absolute fact firmly in mind: staunchly defending and believing lies do not make them truths.
      Peace and love in Christ Jesus’ Name.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I totally disagree with with you, Sabbath Nightmare, for most have learned a great deal of crucial information regarding their salvation, which is not disclosed in their Bible, due to an obscure conspiracy that took place in 325 A.D. to control information that souls could have knowledge of. Sadly that conspiracy has affected souls throughout the centuries and still impacts countless numbers of souls this day.
      Chapter 7 of this writing, ‘The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God,’ absolutely proves, way beyond doubt, that that Pharisee Saul/Paul is a false apostle, and chapter 11 absolutely proves, way beyond doubt, that salvation is earned, and is not a gift of God, as has been falsely taught by Pharisee Saul/Paul.
      This is a link to an overview of that writing, and I pray that you choose to intensely study it with a discerning and unbiased mind: www.rodcdavis.com/Sample-Chapters---The-Miracle-of-Three-Physical-Signs.html
      Once you have intensely studied it with a discerning and unbiased mind, you will know beyond doubt all the lies you have been taught, which you believe to be truths. But, it could be very likely that you will not study it if you are a person of cognitive dissonance. Psychologist Frantz Fanon eloquently defined cognitive dissonance. He wrote, “Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And, because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that doesn’t fit in with the core belief.”
      I truly hope you are not such a person. By the way, this is a link to a short video that makes obvious the deceit craftily placed by men into the King James and Catholic Bibles, so as to maintain the integrity of the blood sacrifice rituals and laws of Exodus 29:10 - 42: th-cam.com/video/CWjlSRAJx2E/w-d-xo.html
      Please keep this absolute fact firmly in mind: staunchly defending and believing lies do not make them truths.
      Peace and love in Christ Jesus’ Name.

  • @michaelcarr9923
    @michaelcarr9923 10 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    What about 2nd Peter chapter 3 verses 15,16. Peter calls Paul a beloved brother. Please explain.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Thank you for your comment, Michael. The King James and Catholic Bibles do contain truth, however, there is abundant, absolute proof they also contain much craftily implanted deceit, and that includes Peter’s epistles. Pharisee Saul/Paul had been a staunch protector of Hebrew Law, as history makes VERY clear, and to that end, which Jesus prophesied would happen, Pharisee Saul/Paul craftily preached doctrine in Jesus’ Name that Jesus did not preach. There is a mountain of evidence which makes very clear the blood covenant of Exodus 24, and the blood sacrifice laws of Exodus 29, are not of God, but of men to suit their needs and traditions. Peter’s epistles contain both truth and deceit, and the deceit is disclosed in this documentary: dld.bz/cRv7k
      In addition, there are several links in the description section of this Paul documentary which you commented on, that provide significant additional proof the King James and Catholic Bibles contain deceit. Also, my dot com website, RodCDavis, provides a plethora of further documented proof that God’s Word and Jesus’ Doctrine within King James and Catholic Bibles, have been severely altered to teach things in Their Names that They did not teach. One such teaching of Pharisee Saul/Paul’s that is not of God or His Son is covered in depth in this documentary: Two Beliefs Regarding Salvation: Given & Earned - Which Is of God? - and this is a link to it: dld.bz/ddEZQ
      The work I am doing is of God as He has confirmed to me thru 2 physical signs that are also disclosed on my website. Clement of Rome, trained & appointed Church Father by Apostle Peter wrote, “There is a certain great difference between truth and custom. For truth is found when it is honestly sought; but custom, whatsoever be the character of the custom received, whether true or false, is strengthened by itself without the exercise of judgment; and he who has received it is neither pleased with it as being true, nor grieved with it as false. For such an one has believed not by judgment, but by prejudice, resting his own hope on the opinion of those who have lived before him on a mere peradventure. And it is not easy to cast off the ancestral garment, though it be shown to himself to be wholly foolish and ridiculous.” If you choose to not study the information contained in the links I have shared, then you are one of 2 types: a defender of tradition; or afraid to study biblical information which will shed light on the lies you believe to be truth.
      In conclusion, 2 John, Chapter 1, Verse 9 tells us, “Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.” That is a very important Verse to pay attention to; why? Those who abide in the doctrine as it is written within the King James and Catholic Bibles, do not abide in Christ, for they do not contain all the true doctrine Jesus gave to mankind, in fulfillment of the Jeremiah, Chapter 31, Verse 31 prophecy.
      Think about this: Jesus told His chosen Twelve, children of the wicked one would be responsible for sowing tares in the good wheat He gave them to sow in the world; Apostle Peter confirmed his Master’s Doctrine was being changed even then, and fretted what would become of it when he would no longer be here to protect it, and he also accused the children of the wicked one as being responsible. Who benefits by the fact that there are those who refuse to accept the reality that the Bible does contain deceit? The wicked one! Why the wicked one? 2 John 1:9 gives that answer: Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. How can a soul abide in doctrine that it does not know exists?
      God Bless.

  • @stephonstayhii6221
    @stephonstayhii6221 10 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Y'all need to stop it shows and prove that he wasn't part of the 12 Paul was the 13th Peter said in acts 15:7 that Jesus already chose him to go to the gentles.that's biblical and Paul's vision is different everytime he speak on them.i follow Christ not Paul.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Peter did not choose Paul. Actually he deemed Pharisee Saul aka Simon Magnus aka apostle to the Gentiles, Paul, to be his enemy and proof of that fact is in The Clementine Homilies. The New Testament is severely corrupted, as is the Old Testament, and this writing absolutely proves that fact way beyond doubt, ‘The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God.’ This is a link to an overview of it: dld.bz/GodsBookAmazon
      Chapter 7 also absolutely proves, way beyond doubt, men appointed Pharisee Saul to an apostleship, and not God or Jesus. I pray, for your own spiritual wellbeing, that you choose to intensely study the book with a discerning and unbiased mind. Once you have intensely studied it with a discerning and unbiased mind, you will know beyond doubt all the lies you have been taught, which you believe to be truths.
      And this is a link to a short video that makes obvious the deceit placed by men into the King James and Catholic Bibles: dld.bz/BibleStudyGuide
      Brother, please keep this absolute fact firmly in mind: staunchly defending and believing lies do not make them truths.
      Peace and love in Christ Jesus’ Name.

  • @777VoiceofReason
    @777VoiceofReason 11 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    So if he didn't die on the cross to save us for our sins, why did he die up there and why didn't God stop it? I have thought it odd though (blood sacrifice). Also, how do we know which laws are really his and how do we find them? Thanks for posting the video too, need as much info as possible.

  • @earlysda
    @earlysda 10 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    As many others have done in the past, the creator of this video tries to pit Scripture against Scripture. That hasn't worked well for anyone yet in history, but if you think that will help your case on the Great Day of Judgment, go for it!
    .
    I think it would be better for you to repent, follow Jesus and his words, and receive eternal life :)

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Thank you for your comment, as biased and uneducated as it may be, and be advised I will repent not, for that which I do has been ordained by God, for He confirmed that fact through two physical signs. They are fully disclosed on my website and I invite you to read them: dld.bz/bRxfB
      You state I use Scripture against Scripture, however you failed to state that I did not use only Scripture that had been authorized church doctrine, by the First Council of Nicaea 325 A.D.; I also utilized Scripture from the Jesus' Gospel recorded Apostle John, which after the other Apostles read it, he ordered it to be hidden to protect it from falsification. That Gospel was found by Catholic priests in 1870, and when read to the Cardinals in Rome, after being translated by the priest who found it, the Cardinals decided that it should be locked away in the vault as it contained doctrine that have not been approved by the First Council of Nicaea 325 A.D., and they feared knowledge of it could have an adverse impact on the Church. Had it not been for the priest who translated it, and three others, that doctrine still would have been lost to mankind.
      In addition, I provided links within the TH-cam description of this documentary video, which provide an abundance of additional information which proves Pharisee Saul a.k.a. Simon Magnus a.k.a. apostle to the Gentiles Paul, to be an imposter. Should you decide to intensely study that which is made available through those links, be prepared to spend in excess of 100 hours, to properly absorb it.
      Further, the doctrine contained in the Gospel recorded by Apostle John, is authenticated by The Clementine Homilies, which are of the early Church Father, Clement of Rome, whom Apostle Peter personally trained in Jesus' Doctrine, and appointed him to be a Church Father. The Clementine Homilies contains a record of the doctrine Apostle Peter preached, and the significance of this writing is that the messages of the lessons contained in it, mirror the messages of the lessons contained in Jesus' Gospel recorded by Apostle John.
      In addition, I would highly encourage you to read the Divine visions and dreams that have been given to Anointed Prophets Russell and Paul Maddock, which can be read at this link: dld.bz/dssFv
      Clement of Rome, trained & appointed Church Father by Apostle Peter wrote, “There is a certain great difference between truth and custom. For truth is found when it is honestly sought; but custom, whatsoever be the character of the custom received, whether true or false, is strengthened by itself without the exercise of judgment; and he who has received it is neither pleased with it as being true, nor grieved with it as false. For such an one has believed not by judgment, but by prejudice, resting his own hope on the opinion of those who have lived before him on a mere peradventure. And it is not easy to cast off the ancestral garment, though it be shown to himself to be wholly foolish and ridiculous.”
      Earlysda, should you choose to not study that which I have shared with you, shame on you, for as Clement of Rome wrote: you are nothing more than a defender of tradition, and believe me when I tell you this - God will deal with you in His own way. God Bless.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you believe that satan is the god of this world, then I have great pity for you. God Bless.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You think you know much, but all that you write makes it very clear your knowledge is fragmented, and you are severely lacking in total knowledge of crucial facts, which is likely brought about by your only studying that which confirms that whichyou want to know. Sad.
      Sheila, this fits you well: Clement of Rome, trained & appointed Church Father by Apostle Peter wrote, “There is a certain great difference between truth and custom. For truth is found when it is honestly sought; but custom, whatsoever be the character of the custom received, whether true or false, is strengthened by itself without the exercise of judgment; and he who has received it is neither pleased with it as being true, nor grieved with it as false. For such an one has believed not by judgment, but by prejudice, resting his own hope on the opinion of those who have lived before him on a mere peradventure. And it is not easy to cast off the ancestral garment, though it be shown to himself to be wholly foolish and ridiculous.”
      God Bless.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You forgot to mention 'tenacity.' I've freely shared the results of 100's of research, conducted via a discerning and unbiased mind - all one needs do, is go to the website I shared, and learn. God Bless.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      TruthSeeker, there is no tampering within the Bible - really? Not according
      to the information below:
      Crucial Information Re: King James and Catholic Bibles
      Important: God IS of love, and being so He wouldn’t have ordained the cruel
      blood covenant of Exodus 24:8 and the blood sacrifice rituals and laws of
      Exodus 29.
      Also, Jesus preached He'd end the blood sacrifice yet that fact is not in
      the New Testament. Check Daniel 8:11 & 9:27, then Isaiah 1:11-13, and then
      Jeremiah 7:22, and compare those lessons to the lessons in Exodus 24:4 &
      7-8 and 29:10-42.
      Malachi 3:6 makes it very clear God does not contradict Himself, yet those
      verses reveal diametrically opposing lessons, which means only one side of
      each of the contradicting lessons can be of God.
      Beloved of God I'm not about religion for God didn’t create religion: man
      did. Jesus taught man did such to suit their needs and traditions.
      In addition, Jesus prophesied His Doctrine would be altered, and things
      would be taught in His Name that He didn’t teach; Apostle Peter in His
      epistle to Apostle James wrote it happened.
      Humbly serving God thru 3 physical signs, I lead TRUTH seekers to Jesus’
      Doctrine hidden by Apostle John to protect it from falsification, and found
      by Catholic priests in 1870.
      Vatican Cardinals chose to not make it public as it contained doctrine not
      authorized by the First Council of Nicaea 325 AD, and they feared the
      crucial contradictions it contains, would have an adverse effect on the
      Church.
      In addition to Jesus' Gospel by Apostle John, 2 other resources absolutely
      prove God’s Word and Jesus’ Doctrine have been severely corrupted. Get the
      facts at RodCDavis.com.
      God Bless.

  • @SincerelyFaith545
    @SincerelyFaith545 8 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    none of this is true either you believe in the bible or you dont, I pray that the eyes of your understanding be opened

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Amnda Modisett, every bit that I shared with you is 100% absolutely true, and should you have studied that which I shared, which included referenced biblical resources, you would know that to be absolute fact. I've done my best to help you, and bid you adieu. God Bless.

  • @anotherone7759
    @anotherone7759 11 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Thank you for this video - it is refreshing in many ways.
    When I read lection 95:3 that you brought in the video (5:40) , my eyes were filled with tears -- that's exactly what happened; sometimes(regards different issues), I wonder how could people be so blind ?
    Also to note that the statement you bring from the C.H: "But if, while I am still alive, they dare thus to misrepresent me, how much more will those who shall come after me dare to do so!"
    reminds me Luke 18:8 "When the Son of man comes, will he find any faith left on earth?", that is a statement by someone who understands that there is great chance that his message will be corrupted, and even might be exterminate from the face of the earth.
    I also believe of another contradiction between the teaching of Jesus and the teaching of Paul. It is regards the doctrine of resurrection.(not the resurrection of Jesus, but the doctrine of resurrection)
    Paul believed in the "zombie" physical resurrection of a dead body form the grave, while I believe Jesus was teaching something else entirely.
    As it implied in Gospel of Philip: "Those who say that the Lord died first and (then) rose up are in error, for he rose up first and (then) died. If one does not first attain the resurrection, he will not die. As God lives, he would"
    thus "the resurrection" is not physical but rather is a revelation.
    Paul himself talks about the conflict regards the resurrection in 2 Timothy 2:17-18: "Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some."
    Well, I don't believe Paul, but rather thinks that he is the one that erred.
    I will be happy to hear your views on the doctrine of resurrection.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thank you for your comment, and your very important question. First, though, the reason for my delay in responding is the fact that your comment did not show up till today - don’t know why, but it has happened other times in the past.
      There are two different resurrections:
      1 - the resurrection of Jesus to prove to the Jews, and ultimately all of mankind, that He truly is the Son of God; and
      2 - Jesus taught each soul earns the purification required to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven, through suffering in many lifetimes, and He preached that fact often throughout the Gospel of the Holy Twelve. Jesus taught that a soul is resurrected from the physical body to spirit form, and if it has not yet achieved the purification required to enter into God’s Kingdom of Light, it will go to Paradise where it will rest for a while before being resurrected back into another, different body, yet its own.
      I have listed all the Verses in which Jesus preached resurrection on my website, www.rodcdavis.com, and the specific link to it is: dld.bz/bySGF.
      God Bless.

  • @nwatson4043
    @nwatson4043 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Good video and informative. I have studied Paul for some time and find he was nothing but a deceiver. He was neither a Jew or Pharisee (as Paul misquotes some scriptures, no student who studied under Gamaliel would make such an error). Paul also states no man has seen God face to face, yet the OT states Moses saw God and it transformed him. Paul is unnatural, and even says that men should not be married, yet God states in Genesis that he created woman for man. Paul denounces the Jews, women, and preached a false pagan religion. This makes Paul anti-God. All one has to do is read and really read what is written and it will be like a light turning on!

  • @pstr09
    @pstr09 10 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    So you deny the inerrancy of Scripture by claiming that what Paul wrote is not inspired Scripture, but promote using other works not included in the Scriptures to deny Paul.... very interesting and I would state very dangerous.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Pastor, thank you for your comments regarding my documentary, Paul: Undeniable Biblical Proof He’s A False Apostle. Whereas I provided links in the TH-cam description of my Documentary, that contain additional supporting information to all of my statements; and
      Whereas Clement of Rome, trained and appointed Church Father by Apostle Peter wrote, “There is a certain great difference between truth and custom. For truth is found when it is honestly sought; but custom, whatsoever be the character of the custom received, whether true or false, is strengthened by itself without the exercise of judgment; and he who has received it is neither pleased with it as being true, nor grieved with it as false. For such an one has believed not by judgment, but by prejudice, resting his own hope on the opinion of those who have lived before him on a mere peradventure. And it is not easy to cast off the ancestral garment, though it be shown to himself to be wholly foolish and ridiculous;” and
      Whereas you chose to be a defender of tradition by stating as you did, rather than studying that which I shared, you are obviously a defender of tradition, and not a seeker of God’s and His Son’s truths, which due to the efforts of Roman Emperor Constantine, were denied to mankind.
      The Clementine Homilies make it very clear Apostle Peter recorded Jesus' Doctrine, and had scribes make copies of it that they may be used by those who were initiated into the Christhood, to teach Jesus' Doctrine to others throughout the nations. Apostle John also recorded Jesus' Doctrine, while incarcerated, and once completed it was shown to the other Apostles for their approval, after which it was ordered hidden to protect it from falsification.
      Proof that the Apostles would have taken such a precaution can be found in Chapter II of Apostle Peter's epistle to Apostle James, which is in The Clementine Homilies. Catholic priests found that Gospel in 1870, and once translated, it was read to the Vatican officials. Because it contained doctrine that had not been authorized by the First Council of Nicaea 325 A.D., they chose to not make it public. They made that decision for they feared that it would have an adverse impact upon the Church. The priest who found it and translated it, over a period of time took the fragments outside of the Vatican, so the information could be made public.
      Think about this: Apostle Peter had recorded Jesus' Doctrine, who had been personally trained by Jesus, yet the false apostle Paul’s epistles make up 66% of the New Testament, and he never even met Jesus - why would that be?
      There were three major groups of Christians that evolved after Jesus' crucifixion: those of the Jewish Christian Movement; a group known as Pauline Christianity, which was founded and headed up by Pharisee Saul a.k.a. Simon Magnus a.k.a. apostle to the Gentiles, Paul; and the third was known as Gnostic Christianity.
      The Arians were of the Jewish Christian movement, and taught and preached the doctrine Jesus taught, but there was a faction in Rome who totally disagreed with their Gospel. Based on my research, it is my opinion that most of those Gospels that the Arians preached, had been created from the original Gospel written by Apostle Peter. All of those Arian Gospels known to be in existence, were ordered confiscated by Roman Emperor Constantine, prior to his convening and presiding over the first Council of Nicaea.
      The Council adopted as authorized church doctrine the Gospel preached by the false apostle, Paul, and after the council adjourned, history has it recorded that Constantine ordered the burning of the Arian Gospels that he had ordered confiscated. Thankfully, the Apostles had ordered the Gospel written by Apostle John, hidden to protect it from falsification, for if they had not, Jesus' true doctrine that he preached, would have been lost to mankind forever.
      Pharisee Saul a.k.a. Simon Magnus a.k.a. apostle to the Gentiles, Paul, preached that Jesus’ crucifixion had been a blood sacrifice to redeem mankind from their sin. That ties with the blood sacrifice rituals and laws of Exodus 29, which is something that Jesus steadfastly preached against, as did all of those who were of the Jewish Christian Movement, which is why Pharisee Saul, hunted, persecuted, and was directly responsible for the deaths of many of those who were Jesus' followers, and preachers of His Doctrine.
      In support of my statement, no Old Testament prophecies, including those in Isaiah 53, state the Messiah will redeem all of mankind from their transgressions, sins, and iniquities. That fact is made clear in Isaiah 1:4 & 11-12, for it is clear that the Lord is very angry with the Israelites, per their transgressions, sins, and iniquities, and no other nation is named. In addition, Verses 11 and 12 make it clear that the blood sacrifice is not of God, and that is further supported by Jeremiah 7:22, and it is also supported by the fact that the prince of the host will end the daily sacrifice as foretold in Daniel 8:11 and 9:27.
      By the way, Isaiah 1:4 & 11-12, make it clear that only the Israelites are being addressed, and no other nation. Further to that, none of the prophecies state any nation, other than the Israelites.
      Further to that, Jesus stated in Matthew 15:24, “But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
      In addition, Jesus told the Pharisees, priests and scribes in his Gospel recorded by Apostle John, "Ye believe that Moses indeed commanded such creatures to be slain and offered in sacrifice and eaten, and so do ye in the Temple, but behold a greater than Moses is herein and he cometh to put away the bloody sacrifices of the law, and the feasts on them, and to restore to you the pure oblation and unbloody sacrifice as in the beginning, even the grains and fruits of the earth." This is only one of many Verses in which Jesus preached such, and confirms He fulfilled the Daniel 8:11 and 9:27 prophecies to end the daily sacrifice.
      In addition, I have calculated the Daniel 9:24-27 prophecies, and I know Jesus fulfilled the prophecy that He would end the daily sacrifice in the midst of the week, and He did such, right on time as the 9:27 prophecy foretold. In addition, I did such calculations in spite of the Rabbinic Curse, “May the bones of the hands and the bones of the fingers decay and decompose, of him who turns the pages of the book of Daniel, to find out the time of Daniel 9:24-27, and may his memory rot from off the face of the earth forever” If you wish to look it up, you will find it in Talmudic Law, page 978, Section 2, Line 28.”
      All that I have just shared with you crystallizes the fact that the blood covenant of Exodus 24, and the blood sacrifice rituals and laws of Exodus 29, are not of God, but are of men, to suit their needs and traditions.
      I pray that you remove your blinders as a supporter of tradition, and seek God's and His Son’s Truths, that due to the efforts of the children of the wicked one, have been hidden from mankind, and in so doing, you will stop preaching and teaching that very dangerous and false doctrine which is popular, and instead preach the truths that Jesus gave to mankind. God Bless.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    You made a very profound statement: "i guess at the end we will all find out." That is very true, but I am firmly convinced that those who can see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, as Jesus stated, can know the truth now. God Bless.

  • @Enriqueahalol
    @Enriqueahalol 11 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    as far as this goes i feel like the information given here can just as well be corrupt misinformation

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Law, which Jesus gave to His 12 during the Last Supper: "A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another and all the creatures of God. Love is the fulfilling of the law. Love is of God, and God is love. Whoso loveth not, knoweth not God." is the Commandment which writes in our hearts the new laws Jesus gave to mankind, that are not in the NT. The partial law I referred is in John 15:17, “These things I command you, that ye love one another.”

  • @777VoiceofReason
    @777VoiceofReason 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for your response friend. Much appreciate the offer.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for your comment. Paul is as phony as a $3.00 bill. I do not have a misunderstanding of the scriptures, and mistranslation is a fallacy staunchly hung onto by diehards who refuse to accept the overwhelming evidence which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt Pharisee Saul is: self appointed; or appointed by men to an apostleship, to suit their needs and tradition. Jesus taught, those who have eyes will see, and those who have ears will hear. I pray you develop both. God Bless.

  • @nomathembanxele6307
    @nomathembanxele6307 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rod C. Davis, I hear what you are saying, but I am still not convinced. Mainly coz there are a few Scriptures that tell us that the Blood of Jesus Christ was shared for our sins and I wont quote from what Paul said with regards to the blood of Jesus Christ since the issue is about him. 1 John 1:7, 1 John 3:5, and in Matthew 26:28, wasnt Jesus speaking and saying what is written there??? and who was Zechariah speaking of in Zechariah 13:1?. Now really Rod C. Davis, when it comes to this point of the blood of Jesus being shared and what Paul was teaching, let us face it, you didnt do a good job there, and translation is not an issue here, meaning, we cant say that maybe KJV made an eroor or NIV did this and that since I am using the Hebrew Bible to get the direct meaning.
    May I again ask this question, what exactly did Jesus mean when He said that He did not come to abolish the law but came to fulfill it??? And do bare in mind that at the end of the day Jesus did leave us with one commandment, which is to love one another...if this is about the ten commandments and us keeping them, we might as well keep the sacrificial ceremonies as well and forget about Jesus coming to shed His blood for the forgiveness of our sins! I mean, even Isaiah prophesied of this (Isaiah 53)
    Your frustrations about Paul being a false Apostle are discrediting the death of Jesus Christ and the shedding of His blood

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nomathemba Khosa, thank you for your comments and feedback regarding my documentary. There is only so much information that can be included in such a documentary as I presented, without it being too lengthy, which is why I included in the description section of TH-cam, additional study resources. If you had taken the time to study those resources, there would have been no need to make the comments that you did.
      Be that as it may, the verses that you quoted which you feel support the blood sacrifice, are also deceit, and merely follow the preachings of the false apostle Paul. Proof of that fact lies in the following documentaries:
      RE: 1 John 1:7, 1 John 3:5 - www.rodcdavis.com/1-2-3-John-Documentary.html
      RE: Matthew 26:28 - www.rodcdavis.com/Matthew-Videos.html
      Once you have taken the time to view the above documentaries, you will know as I've already stated: those verses you quoted are nothing but deceit.
      Jesus, in Matthew 5:17, which is from His Sermon on the Mount, did state He did not come to abolish the law, and in verse 18 He stated that not one title will pass from the law till all be fulfilled; however He also stated in His Sermon on the Mount, "But behold One greater than Moses is here, and he will give you the higher law, even the perfect Law, and this Law shall ye obey," which should have been attached to verse 18.
      The fact that very important statement had been eliminated, when one reads verse 19, they have no law to refer to other than the Hebrew law of the Old Testament. And the authors who craftily eliminated that which Jesus had given, also changed His statement in verse 19. For the statement He actually had given in His Sermon on the Mount had been, "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these commandments which he shall give, and shall teach men so, they shall be called the least in the kingdom;"
      You are absolutely right, Jesus did leave a commandment that is but one of many, which is to love one another; however that commandment was shortened by the authors, for this is the statement that Jesus actually gave regarding that commandment, "A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another and all the creatures of God. Love is the fulfilling of the law. Love is of God, and God is love. Whoso loveth not, knoweth not God."
      Why would that commandment have been changed by the authors to eliminate “all the creatures of God?” It would have been changed for this reason: how would they explain the blood sacrifice rituals and laws supposedly given by the Lord to Moses in Exodus chapter 29? That would be a huge contradiction.
      In the new laws that Jesus gave, which He did in fulfillment of the Jeremiah 31:31 prophecy, of which none are found in the New Testament, He gave 12 commandments that were to replace those 10 that had been given by Moses. Two of the commandments made it very clear that the blood sacrifice is not of God.
      I know the prophecies that you're referring to in Isaiah chapter 53, and they do refer to only the Hebrews, for no other nation is mentioned. Isaiah chapter 1 makes it very clear that the Lord is very upset with the Hebrews, and that fact is crystallized in verse 4, and further to that, verses 11 and 12 totally contradict the blood covenant rituals and laws given for the blood sacrifice for the atonement of sin that are in Exodus chapter 29.
      Further to that, Jesus told His chosen Twelve in His Gospel recorded by Apostle John: "No blood offering, of beast or bird, or man, can take away sin, for how can the conscience be purged from sin by the shedding of innocent blood? Nay, it will increase the condemnation. The priests indeed receive such offering as a reconciliation of the worshippers for the trespasses against the law of Moses, but for sins against the Law of God there can be no remission, save by repentance and amendment. Is it not written in the prophets, Put your blood sacrifices to your burnt offerings, and away with them, and cease ye from the eating of flesh, for I spake not to your fathers nor commanded them, when I brought them out of Egypt, concerning these things? But this thing I commanded saying: Obey my voice and walk in the ways that I have commanded you, and ye shall be my people, and it shall be well with you. But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear. And what doth the Eternal command you but to do justice, love mercy and walk humbly with your God? Is it not written that in the beginning God ordained the fruits of the trees and the seeds and the herbs to be food for all flesh?”
      That which I just shared with you is only one instance of several within Jesus' Gospel recorded by Apostle John, wherein Jesus makes clear that the blood sacrifice will not redeem sin, and He also makes it very clear that the blood sacrifice is not of His Father.
      Nomathemba Khosa, I am not frustrated by Pharisee Saul a.k.a. Simon Magnus a.k.a. apostle to the Gentiles, Paul, for I know beyond doubt that he is a false apostle, and so will you if you study all of the information that I share on this website, and I highly encourage you to do such: www.rodcdavis.com/KnowYourBible.html
      God Bless.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nomathemba Khosa, you MUST get past quoting scriptures that are of a severely corrupted source. Please take heed of the information I share below, and I pray you study that which is referenced, with a discerning and unbiased mind. God Bless.
      Crucial Information Re: King James and Catholic Bibles
      Important: God IS of love, and being so He wouldn’t have ordained the cruel blood covenant of Exodus 24:8 and the blood sacrifice rituals and laws of Exodus 29.
      Also, Jesus preached He'd end the blood sacrifice yet that fact is not in the New Testament. Check Daniel 8:11 & 9:27, then Isaiah 1:11-13, and then Jeremiah 7:22, and compare those lessons to the lessons in Exodus 24:4 & 7-8 and 29:10-42.
      Malachi 3:6 makes it very clear God does not contradict Himself, yet those verses reveal diametrically opposing lessons, which means only one side of each of the contradicting lessons can be of God.
      Beloved of God I'm not about religion for God didn’t create religion: man did. Jesus taught man did such to suit their needs and traditions.
      In addition, Jesus prophesied His Doctrine would be altered and things taught in His Name He didn’t teach; Apostle Peter in His epistle to Apostle James wrote it happened.
      Humbly serving God thru 3 physical signs, I lead TRUTH seekers to Jesus’ Doctrine hidden by Apostle John to protect it from falsification, and found by Catholic priests in 1870.
      Vatican Cardinals chose to not make it public as it contained doctrine not authorized by the First Council of Nicaea 325 AD, and they feared the crucial contradictions it contains, would have an adverse effect on the Church.
      In addition to Jesus' Gospel by Apostle John, 2 other resources absolutely prove God’s Word and Jesus’ Doctrine have been severely corrupted. Get the facts at RodCDavis.com. God Bless.
      And in conclusion, I encourage you to obtain this book as a reference resource:
      This explosive accounting ordained by God, confirmed by Him through 3 physical signs, methodically reveals through referenced resources, the fact that changes were made by men to His Word, to suit their needs and traditions. It also brings to light certain doctrine crucial to salvation that's not in the New Testament, which Jesus had given in fulfillment of the Jeremiah 31:31 prophecy: Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel.
      Jesus, as did Prophets before Him, preached against certain revered Hebrew Laws of Genesis and Exodus. Due to the co-conspiring between certain parties in 325 AD, none of the doctrine Jesus preached that contradicted revered Hebrew Law, is found within the New Testament.
      eBook - Amazon.com - link: dld.bz/d3w7c - Hard & Soft Cover Soon Available Worldwide

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Jesus told His Disciples, not even the angels will know when He's going to return; He said only God knows when that will happen. Being this is July 21st, it confirms Jesus spoke the truth. God Bless.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    [CONT-4] and 4-Being Pharisee Saul attacked Apostle James in a synagogue as he preached to, and baptized followers of Jesus, and being Saul left James for dead, which is verified within The Clementine Homilies and Recognitions; 5-Do you think it could be at all possible Jesus or His Father would have appointed such a person to an apostleship? [CONT-5]

  • @JesusisGodism
    @JesusisGodism 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Gal 2:7 "The gospel of uncircumcision was committed to Paul for the Gentiles."
    Gal 1:8-9 "But if we or an angel of heaven preach to you another gospel than that which we have preached, let him be cursed!"
    Rom 15:8"Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision."
    Gal 2:7 "the gospel of circumcision was committed to Peter."
    Mark 16:15 And Jesus said to Peter, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to ALL creation."
    Gal 1:8-9 "let THEM be cursed!"

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you for your feedback, and as His humble servant I call upon Almighty God to Bless you in your research, and I ask on your behalf that He send angels to guide you. Amen and Amen.

  • @goanna50
    @goanna50 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jeremiah 7 Tells us all need to know about how much the people of Israel had strayed from the commandments. Paul was the false apostle, hidden more and more over the centuries to cover up for people STILL now not living as God had asked. Paul WAS the father of Christianity and it has nothing to do with Jesus.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for proving my point. Pharisee Saul / Paul preached circumcision, whereas Jesus taught when asked by a disciple, "Master, wilt thou that infants be received into the congregation in like manner as Moses commanded by circumcision? And Jesus answered, For those who are in Christ there is no cutting of the flesh, nor shedding of blood." God Bless.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You are absolutely correct, "Paul was Constantine's apostle not Jesus'," for Constantine, when he convened the 1st Council of Nicaea 325 AD to determine authorized church doctrine, he endorsed Saul / Paul's doctrine, and ordered Jesus' Doctrine destroyed; albeit history also has it recorded Emperor Theodosius ordered Jesus Doctrine destroyed; never the less it was ordered destroyed. Thanks to Apostle John's foresight, Jesus Doctrine was not lost forever. God Bless.

  • @dand2747
    @dand2747 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this video - it is refreshing in many ways.
    When I read lection 95:3 that you brought in the video, my eyes were filled with tears -- that's exactly what happened; sometimes(regards different issues), I wonder how could people be so blind ?
    Also to note that the statement you bring from the C.H: "But if, while I am still alive, they dare thus to misrepresent me, how much more will those who shall come after me dare to do so!"
    reminds me Luke 18:8 "When the Son of man comes, will he find any faith left on earth?", that is a statement by someone who understands that there is great change that his message will be corrupted, and even might be exterminate from the face of the earth.
    I also believe of another contradiction between the teaching of Jesus and the teaching of Paul. It is regards the doctrine of resurrection.(not the resurrection of Jesus, but the doctrine of resurrection)
    Paul believed in the "zombie" physical resurrection of a dead body form the grave, while I believe Jesus was teaching something else entirely.
    As it implied in Gospel of Philip: "Those who say that the Lord died first and (then) rose up are in error, for he rose up first and (then) died. If one does not first attain the resurrection, he will not die. As God lives, he would"
    thus "the resurrection" is not physical but rather is a revelation.
    Paul himself talks about the conflict regards the resurrection in 2 Timothy 2:17-18: "Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some."
    Well, I don't believe Paul, but rather thinks that he is the one that erred.
    I will be happy to hear your views on the doctrine of resurrection.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dan, I finally recieved the message from the person whm wrote this, and responded today. The resonse is bleow:
      Thank you for your comment, and your very important question. First, though, the reason for my delay in responding is the fact that your comment did not show up till today - don’t know why, but it has happened other times in the past.
      There are two different resurrections:
      1 - the resurrection of Jesus to prove to the Jews, and ultimately all of mankind, that He truly is the Son of God; and
      2 - Jesus taught each soul earns the purification required to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven, through suffering in many lifetimes, and He preached that fact often throughout the Gospel of the Holy Twelve. Jesus taught that a soul is resurrected from the physical body to spirit form, and if it has not yet achieved the purification required to enter into God’s Kingdom of Light, it will go to Paradise where it will rest for a while before being resurrected back into another, different body, yet its own.
      I have listed all the Verses in which Jesus preached resurrection on my website, www.rodcdavis.com, and the specific link to it is: dld.bz/bySGF.
      God Bless.

    • @dand2747
      @dand2747 11 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rod C. Davis
      Thank you for your answer.
      It was me actaully posing the comment twice using another account, as i saw that about one day passed and i could not see my message for some uknown reason.
      with regards to reincarnation. Some say that The "Treatise on the resurrection" found at Nag-Hamadi, demonstrate that there is more than one "resurrection":
      physical - which means rebirth(or reincrnation).
      spirtual - maybe the recieve of the revelation.
      from Wikipedia on Catharism:
      "Zoé Oldenbourg (2000) compared the Cathars to "Western Buddhists" because she considered that their view of the doctrine of "resurrection" taught by Jesus was, in fact, similar to the Buddhist doctrine of reincarnation"/Rebirth.
      I accept the reality of previous life; however, for specific reason, i do not believe in the existace of metaphysical "soul", nor in metaphysical places called "hell" of "paradise". God's Kingdom is inside.
      Anyway, I will be happy to hear how you can validate the "Gospel of the holy 12".
      [for now, i have found that some veses in it, very similar to verses in Gospel of Thomas(only discovered at 40's).]

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome.

  • @wayner8640
    @wayner8640 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Isn't this the same as Matt 22:36-40? 1 Jn 2 puts it this way, 1Jn 2:5,6 “But whoever continually keeps his commandments is the kind of person in whom God's love has truly been perfected. This is how we can be sure that we are in union with God. The one who says that he abides in him must live the same way he himself lived.” He then writes it's an old commandment yet a new one. It's a summation of the ten commandments, which were examples of love. Jesus empowers us to to keep His commandments

  • @ravenmoon1165
    @ravenmoon1165 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This idea that Jesus did not die for our sins flies in the face of Isaiah 53. He is the passover lamb, and by his stripes we are healed. Psalm 22 shows us this was promised as well. Otherwise, I agree that Paul is a false prophet and a liar. Isaiah 53:4-6 Surely he took up our pain
    and bore our suffering,
    yet we considered him punished by God,
    stricken by him, and afflicted.
    5 But he was pierced for our transgressions,
    he was crushed for our iniquities;
    the punishment that brought us peace was on him,
    and by his wounds we are healed.
    6 We all, like sheep, have gone astray,
    each of us has turned to our own way;
    and the Lord has laid on him
    the iniquity of us all.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Beloved, your defense has been presented to me so very many times since 2008. If one truly seeking truth, intensely studies the Isaiah 53 prophecies you referenced, with a discerning and unbiased mind, they will find your assumption that He did such for all of mankind, is totally wrong, as Chapter 11 of this writing absolutely proves, way beyond doubt, ‘The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God.’ This is a link to an overview of it, and I pray, for your own spiritual wellbeing, that you choose to intensely study it with a discerning and unbiased mind: www.rodcdavis.com/Sample-Chapters---The-Miracle-of-Three-Physical-Signs.html
      Once you have intensely studied it with a discerning and unbiased mind, you will know beyond doubt all the lies you have been taught regarding salvation, which you believe to be truths.
      And this is a link to a short video that makes obvious the deceit placed by men into the King James and Catholic Bibles: th-cam.com/video/CWjlSRAJx2E/w-d-xo.html
      Beloved, please keep this absolute fact firmly in mind: staunchly defending and believing lies do not make them truths.
      Peace and love in Christ Jesus’ Name.

    • @zacneymar
      @zacneymar 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      the prophecy in Isaiah 53 doesn't end at verse 6 it has 6 more verses so. please read it in context of the whole thing.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just Saying, thanks for your comment, but I did not simply read Isaiah 53, as I did not simply read the entire Book of Isaiah - I intensely studied it with a discerning and unbiased mind, and cross referenced the lessons with numerous other biblical resources, and it is due to the encompassing, unbiased knowledge I have that I can emphatically state that which I have. I suggest you do the same intense, discerning and unbiased study as have I, to know the truth God has passed down thru His prophets, and not the falsehoods promoted by men, in God's Name. God Bless.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for your comment, but I totally disagree with: "Really the issue comes down to the misapplication of non-biblical proofs." The evidence I shared is indeed biblical proof, and proves Paul is a bona fide liar. In His Gospel recorded by Apostle John, Jesus preached often against the blood covenant of Exodus 24, Verse 8, even though that fact is not found in the New Testament. However, proof that he did indeed preach against the blood covenant is found in the Old Testament. CONT-1

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The accounting of Paul attacking James is within The Clementine Homilies & Recognitions. Re: “That quote of Jesus predicting an evil future kingdom who are following 'Paulinity & the doctrines of men. What book was in from?” I did not make that exact statement, however I did state that Jesus prophesied His Doctrine would be changed and things would be taught in His Name that He did not teach, and told His chosen 12 children of the wicked one would be responsible. CONT-1

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for your comment and suggestion. I checked the link you gave & it is my opinion there the two better resources for a person who is seeking unbiased truth about Saul/Paul and Christianity: they are: 1- the Gospel of the Holy Twelve (Jesus’ Gospel), which was written by Apostle John while incarcerated, & 2- The Clementine Homilies; the lessons contained within them mirror each other. Apostle John ordered Jesus’ Gospel hidden to protect it from falsification.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My most humble thanks to you for your kind comment; you are absolutely a student of Jesus and His Father's Truths, and I applaud you for the time you devoted to do such. Humbly serving our Lord God Almighty, I call upon Him thru His Son to richly Bless you, yours and your work. Amen.

  • @kathleenwharton2139
    @kathleenwharton2139 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for this video. I am not a theology educated person, so please bear with me. But I have really wondered about so many of these things you have talked about. If one is truly concerned with the spiritual part of a person, all the old Jewish laws make no sense. I believe in the Ten Commandments. That makes spiritual sense. Blood sacrifice is just plain evil and accomplishes nothing to increase a person's spirituality. I have a difficult time even wading through the Old Testament. Jesus came to correct this. He told us His Words are of Spirit. The Sermon on the Mount is a beautiful explanation of the Spirit of The Ten Commandments. And He tried to correct the people of their man made laws. My main objection with Paul has been (I don't know whether he meant to do this or people have just taken something he said and run with it) but this whole saved by grace thing and you will be condemned and go to Hell if you try to live the law (the commandments) that is stupid. Jesus said. If you love me, keep my commandments. Jesus was of spirit. The kingdom of God within. what He says is of spiritual benefit. Paul set up a world kingdom. The Church. and here enters a whole new batch of man made rules. That everyone can argue over and think they are more right and better than another. I stay out of church and stay with Jesus.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +kathleen Wharton Sister in Christ, I enjoyed reading your comment. My wife and I are away getting some needed rest and relation we have denied ourselves for quite some time now.. You have a sincere desire to learn, and thus being I would like to send you an easy to read and understand book as a gift, that will be very helpful to you in your search for truth. My email address is revroderickcdavis@gmail.com. I look forward to hearing from you. Peace and love in Christ Jesus' Name.

  • @karamee78
    @karamee78 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please just stop. Everybody just research the beginning of the christian religion and you will find all of your answers. the christian religion was invented. Go see why and how, I challenge you!!!

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Good for you. Unbiased research and study is a must to be able to discern God’s and Jesus’ genuine lessons from those of men that are being taught in Their Names. Keep in mind God did not create religion. In the beginning He gave His Word for mankind to obey, but men changed it to suit their needs and traditions. God sent prophets to correct those changes, and they were reviled for trying to do so, and some were slain. Then God sent His Son to fulfill Scripture, which He did, by renewing His Father’s genuine Word, but He too was slain for doing so.
      Three major groups of Christianity evolved after Jesus’ crucifixion: The Jewish Christian movement which consisted of Jesus’ followers and those who knew Him; the 2nd was Pauline Christianity, started by Pharisee Saul, aka Simon Magnus, whom Apostle Peter deemed to be his enemy, for he preached doctrine that contradicted the lessons being taught by Peter and the other Apostles.
      Due to a conspiracy in 325 AD, the counterfeit doctrine Pharisee Saul taught was adopted to be authorized church doctrine, over the doctrine of the Jewish Christian Movement. All that I shared with you is fully disclosed and accounted for thru numerous referenced biblical resources that are in this writing: ‘The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God’. The New Testament is severely corrupted, as is the Old Testament, and that writing proves that fact way beyond doubt. This is a link to an overview of it: dld.bz/GodsBookAmazon

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    CONTINUED-8 The Homilies also contains a record of the doctrine Peter preached, which was recorded by Clement of Rome, a Church Father who had been trained and appointed by Peter, and that doctrine mirrors that which is contained in the Gospel recorded by Apostle John. There are links to each of these in the description section of this video. God Bless

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am an ordained minister serving God, His Son and mankind in Christ's Church, Unified Church or Christ & Truth. May God shower abundant Blessings upon you, and upon all those whom you cherish, and upon the work you do. Amen and Amen.

  • @DanWilliams25bills
    @DanWilliams25bills 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If Peter was so against Paul then why would he write what he wrote in 2 Peter 3:15-16? Peter understood that people would come along and misinterpret the writings of Paul by the way Paul formed his letters. If it was an issue at that time in history, it makes since that also in these latter times people will also say that Paul was preaching against the laws of God. It's the same argument that put Paul on trial in the book of Acts where he defends his life from those trying to persecute him for teaching against the law. He stated that at no time did he preach against the law of the Jews or anything else. People have misunderstood the writings of Paul forever. It is one of the stumbling blocks that God said he would put before us. It is to test mans heart. To see if he will keep his commandments or be easily turned away by what seems to be another Gospel but is not. People forget who Paul was writing too. He was writing to Gentiles teaching them the law, telling them not to forsake the Sabbath days and not to let people judge them in food or drink. Meaning these are things he had to teach them. The laws of the clean and unclean foods. The Sabbath day. The feast. Also he taught that Jesus nailed the law to the cross, meaning the animal sacrifice law. The Roman Catholic Church has messed this up completely, teaching the law is done away with and the churches that have come out of her have carried the message also.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Dan Williams
      Dan Williams, thank you for your comment. First of all, 1 & 2 Peter have been severely corrupted, as this documentary clearly demonstrates: dld.bz/cRv7k
      Second of all, Pharisee Saul/Paul did not obey Jesus’ Laws, which were His Father’s Laws originally given to mankind thru Holy Spirit, and Jesus gave mankind those laws in fulfillment of His Father’s prophecy give to Jeremiah in Chapter 31, Verse 31, and those laws, from Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, are below:
      Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount
      Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from the law or the prophets till all be fulfilled. But behold, One greater than Moses is here, and he will give you the higher law, even the perfect Law, and this Law shall ye obey. Jesus did give the higher law in fulfillment of His Father’s prophecy given to Jeremiah in Chapter 31, Verse 31, but it is not in the New Testament.
      Hear O Israel, JOVA, thy God is One; many are My seers, and My prophets. In Me all live and move, and have subsistence.
      1. Ye shall not take away the life of any creature for your pleasure, nor for your profit, nor yet torment it.
      2. Ye shall not steal the goods of any, nor gather lands and riches to yourselves, beyond your need or use.
      3. Ye shall not eat the flesh, nor drink the blood of any slaughtered creature, nor yet anything which bringeth disorder to your health or senses.
      4. Ye shall not make impure marriages, where love and health are not, nor yet corrupt yourselves, or any creature made pure by the Holy.
      5. Ye shall not bear false witness against any, nor willfully deceive any by a lie to hurt them.
      6. Ye shall not do unto others, as ye would not that others should do unto you.
      7. Ye shall worship One Eternal, the Father-Mother in Heaven, of Whom are all things, and reverence the holy Name.
      8. Ye shall revere your fathers and your mothers on earth, whose care is for you, and all the Teachers of Righteousness.
      9. Ye shall cherish and protect the weak, and those who are oppressed, and all creatures that suffer wrong.
      10. Ye shall work with your hands the things that are good and seemly; so shalt ye eat the fruits of the earth, and live long in the land.
      11. Ye shall purify yourselves daily, and rest the Seventh Day from labour, keeping holy the Sabbaths, and the Festival of your God.
      12. Ye shall do unto others as ye would that others should do unto you.
      Being Pharisee Saul/Paul did not keeps God’s Law, which His Son renewed, God nor His Son would have appointed Pharisee Saul to an apostleship, especially since they knew Pharisee Saul would preach doctrine that would contradict God’s Law renewed by Jesus, and just 1 example can be found in 1 Timothy 4:3-4.
      I could go on and on, but I adhere to this statement by Benjamin Franklin: Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
      I encourage you to intensely study the Gospel of the Holy Twelve: www.rodcdavis.com/Cause---GH12.html, and to verify its authenticity, I urge you to intensely study The Clementine Homilies, for the messages of the lessons contained in it, mirror the messages of the lessons within the Gospel of the Holy Twelve: www.rodcdavis.com/Cause---The-Clementine-Homilies.html.
      Further corroboration to the corruption within the Bible is documented in this writing: The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God:
      This explosive accounting ordained by God as a bible study companion, and confirmed by Him through 3 physical signs, methodically reveals through referenced biblical resources, the fact that changes were made by men to His Word, to suit their needs and traditions. It also brings to light certain doctrine crucial to salvation that's not in the New Testament, which Jesus had given in fulfillment of the Jeremiah 31:31 prophecy: Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel.
      Jesus, as did Prophets before Him, preached against certain revered Hebrew Laws of Genesis and Exodus. Due to the co-conspiring between certain parties in 325 AD, none of the doctrine Jesus preached that contradicted revered Hebrew Law, is found within the New Testament.
      The eBook and printed book can be ordered thru this link: dld.bz/CrucialBibleInfo
      I pray you take the initiative to intensely study that which I have shared.
      God Bless
      Rev. Roderick C. Davis
      Supernatural, Spiritual, Paranormal, Biblical Research & Author.
      Ordained Minister & Anointed Preacher of God’s & Jesus’ Hidden Truths
      www.RodCDavis.com

    • @DanWilliams25bills
      @DanWilliams25bills 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Rod C. Davis Thank you, I'll study these things. I don't like to argue when someone has facts that may help my understanding. I appreciate your help. Should I have any comments or questions I'll be sure to get back to you. Thanks again!

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Dan Williams Peace and love in Christ Jesus' Name. Amen.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    [CONT-3] Think about these important facts: 1-Jesus preached against certain revered Hebrew Laws, which is the actual reason the Jews demanded His crucifixion; and 2-In His Doctrine recorded by Apostle John, Jesus told His chosen Twelve, “Though ye be gathered together in my bosom, if ye keep not my commandments I will cast you forth;” and 3-Being Jesus knew Pharisee Saul to be a devout protector of the Hebrew Laws He preached against; [CONT-4]

  • @FarisMee
    @FarisMee 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have heard the Qamran documents mention two living characters. The good teacher & 'the dark One' or 'The dark teacher'. The Good teacher is often mentioned and I understand that the concensus is it is James - no doubts. So that leaves his adversary, the 'Dark One/Teacher'. And who might he be?

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for your comment. Clement of Rome, trained & appointed Church Father by Apostle Peter wrote, “There is a certain great difference between truth and custom. For truth is found when it is honestly sought; but custom, whatsoever be the character of the custom received, whether true or false, is strengthened by itself without the exercise of judgment; and he who has received it is neither pleased with it as being true, nor grieved with it as false. CONT-1

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    CONT-1 “There is a certain great difference between truth and custom. For truth is found when it is honestly sought; but custom, whatsoever be the character of the custom received, whether true or false, is strengthened by itself without the exercise of judgment; and he who has received it is neither pleased with it as being true, nor grieved with it as false. CONT-2

  • @kellycraig6266
    @kellycraig6266 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does this mean what he wrote is not to be trusted?

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kelly Craig, thank you for your comment. I would not state that whatever Paul wrote cannot be trusted, for he created his epistles with a great deal of craft. What does that statement mean? It means that Pharisee Saul a.k.a. Simon Magnus a.k.a. apostle to the Gentiles Paul, wrote truth as well as deceit, I. E., the deceit that Jesus death on the cross had been a blood sacrifice to redeem mankind from their sin. By mixing truth with deceit, the deceit would more readily be accepted as truth.
      With that being said, anything that is contained in Paul's epistles that connotes Jesus died to save all of mankind from their sins, or that Paul received the Gospel from Jesus or God, or that he had been appointed to an apostleship by Jesus or God, are all deceit. God Bless.

    • @randomstranger9539
      @randomstranger9539 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rod C. Davis
      We can apply this to the bible.
      If the Truth were added falsehood, can we still call it Truth?
      Do not conceal the truth with falsehood.
      God is not the author of confusion.
      Can we really call a bible a word of God?

    • @dwaynejones8722
      @dwaynejones8722 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rod C. Davis I totally understand what you are saying, hit me like a ton of bricks, I asked the very same question, how could the God mentioned in the old testament seem so different from the God of the new testament. My eyes opened after reading in Deuteronomy 22 where it seems like rape is condoned, can you shed some light Rod? thanks

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dwayne, both in the Old and New Testament, if the scripture violates God's Law of Love as given by Holy Spirit, and reaffirmed by Jesus, then the lesson given is not of God. God Bless.

  • @PauloAveiro7
    @PauloAveiro7 8 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    15. And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
    16. As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
    17. Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.
    18. But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen.
    (2 Peter, 3)

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      +Ribeiro Aveiro
      Brother, I have read and heard this defense so very many times since 2008. The New Testament is severely corrupted, as is the Old Testament, and this writing proves that fact way beyond doubt, ‘The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God.’ This is a link to an overview of it, and I pray, for your own spiritual wellbeing, that you choose to intensely study it with a discerning and unbiased mind: www.rodcdavis.com/Sample-Chapters---The-Miracle-of-Three-Physical-Signs.html
      Once you have intensely studied it with a discerning and unbiased mind, you will know beyond doubt all the lies you have been taught, which you believe to be truths.
      And this is a link to a short video that makes obvious the deceit place by men into the King James and Catholic Bibles: th-cam.com/video/CWjlSRAJx2E/w-d-xo.html
      Know this brother, believing lies do not make them truths.
      Peace and love in Christ Jesus’ Name.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    CONT-3 Pharisee Saul may be called apostle to the Gentiles, but that’s not an appointment given by God or Jesus. Proof of that fact is in 3 resources: 1- documentary titled OT Proves Crucial Doctrine Jesus Preached Is Not in the NT; 2- Gospel of the Holy Twelve; and 3 The Clementine Homilies. Some Christians mistakenly state the Gospel of the Holy Twelve is Apocrypha; it is not for it isn’t one of those 14 books. The 3 resource links are in the description of this video. CONT-4

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When Jesus stated, ,"If ye keep my sayings, ye shall not taste death," He meant the fact that souls who keep His Laws will live in the eternal, for He also taught those souls who refuse to mend their ways to those of God, "will be utterly destroyed." God Bless.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very appropriate, especially in view of Jesus' contempt for Pharisees, which He clearly demonstrated in Matthew 23:29-35. God Bless.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    CONTINUED-2 Jesus taught when a soul severs the silver cord [Ecclesiastes 12:6-7] it returns to whence it came, “paradise,” where it will rest before experiencing another lifetime. If the soul was evil it will leave Paradise to spend time in Hades to amend its ways. Once a soul has achieved the required purification, it will enter the Kingdom of Heaven, which looks down upon Paradise. This information is in the Gospel of the Holy Twelve, and a link to it is in the Description. God Bless.

  • @jimmyslegit
    @jimmyslegit 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks you rod for this video it was a blessing

  • @JHNative
    @JHNative 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Boy oh boy was Paul ever a Pharisee. Even his writings are filled with a sort of Christian version of Pharisaism if you can call it that. Also Evangelical Christian Churches (especially the fundamentalist extremists) practically worship Paul. They place him on a pedestal and focus more on what he said rather than what Jesus said. It's kind of a form of Idolatry.
    I have a friend who read that book recently entitled Zealot: the life and times of Jesus of Nazareth and that author comes to a similar conclusion that you do about Paul. Very interesting.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for your comments, Benjamin. I encourage you to study the other resources that are given in the TH-cam description section of this documentary.
      In addition, I feel this documentary may also interest you: www.rodcdavis.com/2-BeliefsReSalvation.html
      God Bless.

    • @JHNative
      @JHNative 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Rod C. Davis I want to know more about this and will make the time to study it out. Very interesting.

  • @KingDavid478
    @KingDavid478 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul never said get rid of the law or circumcision. Read Romans 2. When Paul said that no profit would come from Christ because of circumcision he was simply saying the old law of Moses could not make you righteous because if it could then Jesus had no reason to die. That is what Paul preached in his books.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Scripture taught in churches around the world includes Pauline Christianity, rather than the doctrine preached by Jesus. The doctrine Peter preached, which is within The Clementine Homilies, mirrors that Jesus preached, which was recorded by Apostle John; today it’s known as the Gospel of the Holy Twelve. Roman Emperor Constantine, thru the 1st Council of Nicaea 325 AD, endorsed Paul's doctrine & not that of Jesus. A link to The Clementine Homilies is in the description of this video. God Bless

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Randy, I encourage you, with all my heart, soul and mind to continue your studies in the manner which you have adopted. Jesus, during the Last Supper told His 12: "A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another and all the creatures of God. Love is the fulfilling of the law. Love is of God, and God is love. Whoso loves not, knows not God." CONTINUED

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul, I thank you for your most gracious comment. Jesus taught: pray for those who hate or misuse you; being I am a devout follower of Jesus, and not Pharisee Saul/Paul, I pray for you as Jesus taught. Three resources make it very clear that the Old and New Testaments of the King James and Catholic Bibles have been severely altered to suit the needs and traditions of men. CONT-1

  • @wayner8640
    @wayner8640 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    In fairness: you've taken Gal 5:14 out of context. read the whole chapter. Paul was teaching specifically about relationships toward other people and referring to the laws of relationship. His view of the law and Jesus is evident in Rom 3, especially 31" Do we, then, abolish the Law by this faith (in Jesus)? Of course not! Instead, we uphold the Law." As Jesus said, "I come, not to abolish the Law, but to fulfill the Law."

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for your comments and questions, for the tone of them indicates to me that you truly care. Why indeed is the blood covenant depicted in the book of Revelation? Being that the Old Testament has been corrupted by man to suit their needs and traditions, as taught by both Jesus and Apostle Peter, and a ton of evidence proves the New Testament has been also corrupted by men to suit their needs and traditions, why would you think the Book of Revelations would be exempt? CONT-1

  • @newjerseygracefellowship-o8955
    @newjerseygracefellowship-o8955 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    When we understand the finished work of Jesus on the cross, Paul's epistles will well aligned with Jesus' teachings. Lack of revelation knowledge about the finished work of Jesus on the cross is the reason why this kind of videos are out. Without 13 Pauline Epistles, there is nothing much to believe to get saved.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Grace Community NJ Thank you for your comments. I have spent 100’s of hours studying and cross referencing biblical resources God led me to, which He confirmed to me thru 3 physical signs, each two years apart. They came in July 2010, July 2012 and July 2014, and full disclosure is on my website: RodCDavis.com. I encourage you to read them.
      The resources God led me to, confirmed the Old and New Testaments of the King James and Catholic Bibles have been severely corrupted by men to suit their needs and traditions. Regarding Jesus’ “finished work” of the cross, His closing statement declared He had fulfilled scripture, which did not included saving all souls from their sins: past, present or future. The sad fact is, significant works that He completed, that He referred to in that statement, has not been disclosed in New Testament. Only those who lack wisdom will deny the truths below:
      Crucial Information Re: King James and Catholic Bibles
      Important: God IS of love, and being so He wouldn’t have ordained the cruel blood covenant of Exodus 24:8 and the blood sacrifice rituals and laws of Exodus 29.
      Also, Jesus preached He'd end the blood sacrifice yet that fact is not in the New Testament. Check Daniel 8:11 & 9:27, then Isaiah 1:11-13, and then Jeremiah 7:22, and compare those lessons to the lessons in Exodus 24:4 & 7-8 and 29:10-42.
      Malachi 3:6 makes it very clear God does not contradict Himself, yet those verses reveal diametrically opposing lessons, which means only one side of each of the contradicting lessons can be of God.
      Beloved of God I'm not about religion for God didn’t create religion: man did. Jesus taught man did such to suit their needs and traditions.
      In addition, Jesus prophesied His Doctrine would be altered, and things would be taught in His Name that He didn’t teach; Apostle Peter in His epistle to Apostle James wrote it happened. Pharisee Saul/Paul was the chief aggressor in that regard, and a mountain of biblical evidence proves the fact he taught things in Jesus’ Name that He did not teach.
      Humbly serving God thru 3 physical signs, I lead TRUTH seekers to Jesus’ Doctrine hidden by Apostle John to protect it from falsification, and found by Catholic priests in 1870.
      Vatican Cardinals chose to not make it public as it contained doctrine not authorized by the First Council of Nicaea 325 AD, and they feared the crucial contradictions it contains, would have an adverse effect on the Church.
      In addition to Jesus' Gospel by Apostle John, 2 other resources absolutely prove God’s Word and Jesus’ Doctrine have been severely corrupted. Get the facts at RodCDavis.com.
      I encourage you to intensely study the Gospel of the Holy Twelve: www.rodcdavis.com/Cause---GH12.html, and to verify its authenticity, I urge you to intensely study The Clementine Homilies, for the messages of the lessons contained in it, mirror the messages of the lessons within the Gospel of the Holy Twelve: www.rodcdavis.com/Cause---The-Clementine-Homilies.html.
      Further corroboration to the corruption within the Bible is documented in this writing: The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God:
      This explosive accounting ordained by God as a bible study guide, and confirmed by Him through 3 physical signs, methodically reveals through referenced resources, the fact that changes were made by men to His Word, to suit their needs and traditions. It also brings to light certain doctrine crucial to salvation that's not in the New Testament, which Jesus had given in fulfillment of the Jeremiah 31:31 prophecy: Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel.
      Jesus, as did Prophets before Him, preached against certain revered Hebrew Laws of Genesis and Exodus. Due to the co-conspiring between certain parties in 325 AD, none of the doctrine Jesus preached that contradicted revered Hebrew Law, is found within the New Testament.
      The eBook can be ordered thru this link: dld.bz/CrucialBibleInfo
      I pray you take the initiative to intensely study that which I have shared.
      God Bless
      Rev. Roderick C. Davis
      Supernatural, Spiritual, Paranormal, Biblical Research & Author.
      Ordained Minister & Anointed Preacher of God’s & Jesus’ Hidden Truths
      www.RodCDavis.com

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Val O'Brien, there is much biblical evidence that is not disclosed in the video regarding Paul, but is in a book I will share in a bit. As Jesus came to you, He also came to me on July 12, 2012, at 12:25 AM, and there is significance to the date and time of His visit, which was a message in and of itself that was spiritually disclosed to me in November 2012.
      Chapter 7 of this writing, The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God, which includes numerous referenced biblical resources, absolutely proves way beyond doubt, Pharisee Saul, aka Simon Magnus, aka apostle to the Gentiles, Paul, was appointed to his apostleship by men to suit their needs and traditions, and not by God or Jesus. The book, which is dedicated to God, and the reason is fully disclosed, and so is the significance of the date and time of Jesus’ visit to me, is available thru Amazon, bookstores around the world, and thru my website, RodCDavis.com, which is 99% dedicated to God, Jesus and Holy Spirit.
      Peace and love in Jesus’ Name.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brother in Christ, Val, I would not be too quick to make the judgement you did about being a coincidence. I have found that when it comes to God, Jesus and Holy Spirit, there is no such thing as coincidence. Peace and love in Jesus' Name.

  • @T1201
    @T1201 11 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    this is true. many different things seem right to people. i guess at the end we will all find out.

  • @stephenfulloffaith
    @stephenfulloffaith 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have often wondered what really happened in the story of Cain and Abel. I was wondering if you could further expound on what you were saying, or maybe you could do a video further explaining what exactly happened. Thank you.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +stephenfulloffaith Thank you for your question. A simple answer to your question is this: any accounting in the Old Testament that violates God’s Law of Love, is not of Him, but of men. The story regarding Cain and Able violates God’s Law of Love, as is demonstrated below in 2 parts:
      1. Commandment: Love one another and all the creatures of God. Love is the fulfilling of the law. Love is of God, and God is love. Whoso loveth not, knoweth not God.
      2. AND Iesus said unto them, “Behold a new law I give unto you, which is not new but old. Even as Moses gave the Ten Commandments to Israel after the flesh, so also I give unto you the Twelve for the Kingdom of Israel after the Spirit. For who are the Israel of God? Even they of every nation and tribe who work righteousness, love mercy, and keep my commandments; these are the true Israel of God. And standing upon his feet, Iesus spake, saying: 'Hear O Israel, JOVA, thy God is One; many are My seers, and My prophets. In Me all live and move, and have subsistence'.”
      1. “Ye shall not take away the life of any creature for your pleasure, nor for your profit, nor yet torment it.
      2. “Ye shall not steal the goods of any, nor gather lands and riches to yourselves, beyond your need or use.
      3. “Ye shall not eat the flesh, nor drink the blood of any slaughtered creature, nor yet anything which bringeth disorder to your health or senses.
      4. “Ye shall not make impure marriages, where love and health are not, nor yet corrupt yourselves, or any creature made pure by the Holy.
      5. “Ye shall not bear false witness against any, nor willfully deceive any by a lie to hurt them.
      6. “Ye shall not do unto others, as ye would not that others should do unto you.
      7. “Ye shall worship One Eternal, the Father-Mother in Heaven, of Whom are all things, and reverence the holy Name.
      8. “Ye shall revere your fathers and your mothers on earth, whose care is for you, and all the ‘Teachers of Righteousness.’
      9. “Ye shall cherish and protect the weak, and those who are oppressed, and all creatures that suffer wrong.
      10. “Ye shall work with your hands the things that are good and seemly; so shalt ye eat the fruits of the earth, and live long in the land.
      11. “Ye shall purify yourselves daily, and rest the Seventh Day from labour, keeping holy the Sabbaths, and the Festival of your God.
      12. “Ye shall do unto others as ye would that others should do unto you.”
      God Bless.

    • @stephenfulloffaith
      @stephenfulloffaith 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for your speedy reply.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +stephenfulloffaith You're welcome. Peace and love in Christ Jesus' Name. Amen.

  • @MyVideoproductions1
    @MyVideoproductions1 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about Esg 40-48? Can i through away the Old Testament? What about corruption in the New Testament?

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your comment, but as the American Indians so aptly put it, Pharisee Saul/Paul spoke/wrote with a forked tongue. I find it difficult to determine exactly what the message is that you're attempting to share, so I will explain more fully to you the American Indian’s saying, as it applies to Saul/Paul. History makes it clear Pharisees and scribes were protectors of Hebrew Law. CONT-1

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jesus came to fulfill scripture & that is why He died on the cross. John 19:28 KJV, “After this, Jesus knowing that all things were now accomplished, that the scripture might be fulfilled, saith, I thirst.” John 13:18, 17:12 & 19:24 also tell us He came to fulfill scripture. Daniel 8:11 tells us the Messiah will end the daily sacrifice & Daniel 9:27 tells us He’ll end the daily sacrifice in the midst of the week & He did when He became the sacrifice that ended the sacrifices. God Bless

  • @alwayzfwdbeatz
    @alwayzfwdbeatz 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    After Listening to your commentary, I found out that you doubt what God can do. Judas Iscariot who was one of the twelve betrayed Jesus, and killed himself and that leaves us with 11. Thomas was not heard of, and that leaves us with 10. Steven who was stoned by Saul/Paul prayed for the forgiveness for his stoners. Acts 7:59-60. When Jesus was accused of being a false teacher just as you accuse Saul who became Paul of being a false apostle of Christ in Mark 3: 20 - 28, Jesus said in verse 25.

  • @georgeburks5288
    @georgeburks5288 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1 John 1:7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pharisee Saul / Paul, protector of Hebrew Law, preached doctrine Jesus did not, and the doctrine Paul preached reinstituted the Hebrew Laws Jesus preached against. Three writings prove Jesus preached against the Hebrew Laws Paul protected; they are: the Old Testament, KJV; the Gospel of the Holy Twelve; and The Clementine Homilies, which contains a record of the doctrine Apostle Peter preached. Links to those resources are in the description of this documentary. God Bless.

  • @Nemesis1ism
    @Nemesis1ism 11 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Back to the Blood scarfice you are in error. Matthew 5
    17Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 19Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.. Yeshua was the Last blood sacrifice He Sacrificed himself FOR us Yeshua Blood was fullfillment . Be careful that you do not lead anyone astray Yeshua FULLFILLED the blood scrafice. So maybe you need to hit that black book harder and stay away from them other books

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks again for your comment. Many parts of the Bible contain disinformation, due to changes made to God's Word and Jesus’ Doctrine, by the men to suit their needs and traditions, and also by children of the wicked one. Jesus made clear the Gospel of His time had been corrupted due to the foolish imaginations of men, and Apostle Peter confirmed which parts of the Gospel of that time had been corrupted by men. The Gospel of their time is now known as the Old Testament.
      Jesus prophesied to his chosen 12 that His Doctrine would be changed by children of the wicked one, and things would be taught in His Name that He did not teach. Apostle Peter in his epistle to Apostle James, which is within The Clementine Homilies, confirms it happened even then, and fretted what would become of his Master’s Doctrine when he would no longer be here to protect it.
      As an example, Matthew 5:17-19 had been corrupted by children of the wicked one, as a gateway to allow the continuation of the blood sacrifice of Exodus 24:8, to continue into the New Testament, even though Jesus, and prophets before Him, had preached against that Hebrew Law. Below are those verses from the King James Bible, KJV.
      17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
      18: For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
      19: Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
      Those verses are from Jesus Sermon on the Mount, which Apostle John also recorded in Jesus’ Gospel, and below are those verses from Lection 25:8-9.
      8. Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from the law or the prophets till all be fulfilled. But behold One greater than Moses is here, and he will give you the higher law, even the perfect Law, and this Law shall ye obey.
      9. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these commandments which he shall give, and shall teach men so, they shall be called the least in the kingdom; but whosoever shall do, and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of Heaven.
      The 2nd section of verse 8: But behold One greater than Moses is here, and he will give you the higher law, even the perfect Law, and this Law shall ye obey, should have been included in Matthew 5:18, for without it, when one reads verse 19, they have no law to refer to other than the Hebrew Law of the Old Testament.
      Jesus said children of the wicked one would use craft to change His Doctrine to teach things in His Name that he did not teach, and they certainly used craft in Matthew 5:19, for they eliminated the fact that Jesus had said His Law, verse 9 of Lection 25. In Lection 2 of Jesus’ Gospel recorded by Apostle John, the Angel Gabriel told Mary that the holy one she would give birth to, would save people from their sins, whosoever obeyed His Law. In fulfillment of Jeremiah 31:31, Jesus did give mankind new laws that they must follow to earn their salvation, however as they contradict the blood sacrifice for the remission of sin, of Exodus 24:8, they are not found in the New Testament.
      I could go on and on and on with numerous examples that make very clear your statement to me is very much in error. Instead, if you are truly a truth seeker, I wholeheartedly recommend that you study the information contained in the links that I gave in the description section of this video. God Bless.

    • @arielabidan2265
      @arielabidan2265 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Rod C. Davis Thank you for that insite brother. Many people are aware that our Bible's (and Christ's teachings) have been manipulated, but its not always easy to identify exactly how/where.
      God bless

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you for your comment. I'll share an easy, but certainly not a comprehensive approach to identify that which is not of God or Jesus, but keep in mind, only study will accomplish that - any Verses that violates this old Commandment which Jesus renewed at the Last Paschal Supper, are not of God or Jesus: “Love one another and all the creatures of God. Love is the fulfilling of the law. Love is of God, and God is love. Whoso loveth not, knoweth not God.” This commandment is also found in 1 John, Chapter 4, Verses 7 and 8, but “All the creatures of God,” is missing from that lesson. Of course there is a profound reason behind its omission: if it had been disclosed that God deemed mankind should love His creatures, then how could readers of the Old Testament believe God would demand His innocent creatures to be slain, as a blood sacrifice, to redeem a man from his sin? It would be another Bible inconsistency that could not be explained to a savvy person’s satisfaction. God Bless.

    • @Nemesis1ism
      @Nemesis1ism 11 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rod C. Davis I am a child of 62 years actually it would be 58 years . You know the story of Esau and Jacob . But whats more interesting is When Esau marries the daughter of Ishmael. Even tho Esau was of the Covenant people none of his decendents for 10 generations could be cleansed purified but 1.
      God said of Esau in latter times you shall remove the Joke your brother Jacob put onto you. Why is this interesting . THE LAW! Davids grandmother was Ruth it doesn't matter what Ruth did or didn't do . Under the law no covenant people could marry into the tribe of Moabites. Davids mother isn't even named in the Torah . But in the Jewish talmud its mentioned . How old is the Talmud and is it not the book of baalam and his god baal. It is said that davids mother was decendent of Kings . So we know Saul and David were the First 2 kings of Judah and Israel. So Davids mother could not be of the covenant people being a decendent of kings and all. Also its clearly stated that DAN shall judge his people as Israel. It also says clearly that when the city of Dan is distroyed The Line of David would be cut off. NO way was Yesyua of the tribe of Judah or related in anyway to DAVID . Read what Amos says about the Star of David and its evil. David was Evil Solomon was evil and rebohuam was evil. The Key to the story of David is clear. Rebohaum married an ammonite decendents of lots daughter 1 Moabites decendents of lots daughter 2 . The Ammonites were close to the assyrians and paid tthem tribute . You say as does jewish scribes that Israel was destroyed around 750BC. Not likely Israel wouldn't except David as King. The Levit Priest wouldn't go against the law already established by God threw Moses. I know my grandchildren and we had them 15 years latter than most peoples because we taught are kids to become older befor they raised a family. Solomon had a habit in marrage for alliances , Thats why Rebohaum married the ammonite to forge an alliance so as to get close to the assyrians . I say Israel was destroyed around 950BC. David was still alive. Judah failed at getting the ark from the levits. Look at the lies jews tell . They say levi had no land . They say that Dan had no land. But the talk of the city of dan LOL! The levi had land the first born levi who became levit priest had no LAND! Read about the building of the covenant Tent . Where it was to be placed in the Camps. Levi had a standard. as did all 12 tribes Only the levit priest had no standard or land. Its pretty screwed up miss. So many false prophets out of JUDAH is the problem. Bible speaks of these false prophets . It would be so easy if they had been named.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for your comprehensive comment, and I share with you that I am a child of 70 years, and have been married for 50. Jesus told His chosen Twelve, “Verily I say unto you, my twelve whom I have chosen, that which hath been taught by them of old time is true-though corrupted by the foolish imaginations of men.” Being Jesus, as did Apostle Peter in The Clementine Homilies, made clear the teachings of old time were corrupted, and being God led me to that which I have spent 100’s of hours studying; and being God confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt, thru 2 physical signs He Blessed me with, that the work a I am doing is absolutely of His Will, I must disagree with that which you have presented. The 2 physical signs, and much, much more, are fully disclosed on my website: RodCDavis.com. God Bless.

  • @danielparziale1466
    @danielparziale1466 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It was only through the grace of God that Paul could have been an apostle. Only through Jesus Christ can anyone be transformed . You atheists sure are getting desperate.

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for your comment regarding my documentary, Paul: Undeniable Biblical Proof He’s A False Apostle, but I do not know where you are coming from, for I am not an atheist, and there is a mountain of evidence not included in my documentary, which proves beyond doubt neither Jesus nor His father would have appointed such a scoundrel as Pharisee Saul a/k/a Simon Magnus a/k/a apostle to the Gentiles, Paul, to an apostleship; actually the evidence proves that the appointment was made by men to suit their needs and traditions.
      In addition, whereas I provided links in the TH-cam description of my Documentary, that contain additional supporting information to all of my statements; and whereas Clement of Rome, trained and appointed Church Father by Apostle Peter wrote, “There is a certain great difference between truth and custom. For truth is found when it is honestly sought; but custom, whatsoever be the character of the custom received, whether true or false, is strengthened by itself without the exercise of judgment; and he who has received it is neither pleased with it as being true, nor grieved with it as false. For such an one has believed not by judgment, but by prejudice, resting his own hope on the opinion of those who have lived before him on a mere peradventure. And it is not easy to cast off the ancestral garment, though it be shown to himself to be wholly foolish and ridiculous;” and
      Whereas you chose to be a defender of tradition by stating as you did, rather than studying that which I shared, you are obviously a defender of tradition, and not a seeker of God’s and His Son’s truths, which due to the efforts of Roman Emperor Constantine, were denied to mankind.
      The Clementine Homilies make it very clear Apostle Peter recorded Jesus' Doctrine, and had scribes make copies of it that they may be used by those who were initiated into the Christhood, to teach Jesus' Doctrine to others throughout the nations. Apostle John also recorded Jesus' Doctrine, while incarcerated, and once completed it was shown to the other Apostles for their approval, after which it was ordered hidden to protect it from falsification.
      Proof that the Apostles would have taken such a precaution can be found in Chapter II of Apostle Peter's epistle to Apostle James, which is in The Clementine Homilies. Catholic priests found that Gospel in 1870, and once translated, it was read to the Vatican officials. Because it contained doctrine that had not been authorized by the First Council of Nicaea 325 A.D., they chose to not make it public. They made that decision for they feared that it would have an adverse impact upon the Church. The priest who found it and translated it, over a period of time took the fragments outside of the Vatican, so the information could be made public.
      Think about this: Apostle Peter had recorded Jesus' Doctrine, who had been personally trained by Jesus, yet the false apostle Paul’s epistles make up 66% of the New Testament, and he never even met Jesus - why would that be?
      There were three major groups of Christians that evolved after Jesus' crucifixion: those of the Jewish Christian Movement; a group known as Pauline Christianity, which was founded and headed up by Pharisee Saul a.k.a. Simon Magnus a.k.a. apostle to the Gentiles, Paul; and the third was known as Gnostic Christianity.
      The Arians were of the Jewish Christian movement, and taught and preached the doctrine Jesus taught, but there was a faction in Rome who totally disagreed with their Gospel. Based on my research, it is my opinion that most of those Gospels that the Arians preached, had been created from the original Gospel written by Apostle Peter. All of those Arian Gospels known to be in existence, were ordered confiscated by Roman Emperor Constantine, prior to his convening and presiding over the first Council of Nicaea.
      The Council adopted as authorized church doctrine the Gospel preached by the false apostle, Paul, and after the council adjourned, history has it recorded that Constantine ordered the burning of the Arian Gospels that he had ordered confiscated. Thankfully, the Apostles had ordered the Gospel written by Apostle John, hidden to protect it from falsification, for if they had not, Jesus' true doctrine that he preached, would have been lost to mankind forever.
      Pharisee Saul a.k.a. Simon Magnus a.k.a. apostle to the Gentiles, Paul, preached that Jesus’ crucifixion had been a blood sacrifice to redeem mankind from their sin. That ties with the blood sacrifice rituals and laws of Exodus 29, which is something that Jesus steadfastly preached against, as did all of those who were of the Jewish Christian Movement, which is why Pharisee Saul, hunted, persecuted, and was directly responsible for the deaths of many of those who were Jesus' followers, and preachers of His Doctrine.
      In support of my statement, no Old Testament prophecies, including those in Isaiah 53, state the Messiah will redeem all of mankind from their transgressions, sins, and iniquities. That fact is made clear in Isaiah 1:4 & 11-12, for it is clear that the Lord is very angry with the Israelites, per their transgressions, sins, and iniquities, and no other nation is named. In addition, Verses 11 and 12 make it clear that the blood sacrifice is not of God, and that is further supported by Jeremiah 7:22, and it is also supported by the fact that the prince of the host will end the daily sacrifice as foretold in Daniel 8:11 and 9:27.
      By the way, Isaiah 1:4 & 11-12, make it clear that only the Israelites are being addressed, and no other nation. Further to that, none of the prophecies state any nation, other than the Israelites.
      Further to that, Jesus stated in Matthew 15:24, “But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
      In addition, Jesus told the Pharisees, priests and scribes in his Gospel recorded by Apostle John, "Ye believe that Moses indeed commanded such creatures to be slain and offered in sacrifice and eaten, and so do ye in the Temple, but behold a greater than Moses is herein and he cometh to put away the bloody sacrifices of the law, and the feasts on them, and to restore to you the pure oblation and unbloody sacrifice as in the beginning, even the grains and fruits of the earth." This is only one of many Verses in which Jesus preached such, and confirms He fulfilled the Daniel
      8:11 and 9:27 prophecies to end the daily sacrifice.
      In addition, I have calculated the Daniel 9:24-27 prophecies, and I know Jesus fulfilled the prophecy that He would end the daily sacrifice in the midst of the week, and He did such, right on time as the 9:27 prophecy foretold. In addition, I did such calculations in spite of the Rabbinic Curse, “May the bones of the hands and the bones of the fingers decay and decompose, of him who turns the pages of the book of Daniel, to find out the time of Daniel 9:24-27, and may his memory rot from off the face of the earth forever” If you wish to look it up, you will find it in Talmudic Law, page 978, Section 2, Line 28.”
      All that I have just shared with you crystallizes the fact that the blood covenant of Exodus 24, and the blood sacrifice rituals and laws of Exodus 29, are not of God, but are of men, to suit their needs and traditions.
      I pray that you remove your blinders as a supporter of tradition, and seek God's and His Son’s Truths, that due to the efforts of the children of the wicked one, have been hidden from mankind, and in so doing, you will stop believing in that very dangerous and false doctrine of Pharisee Saul/Paul, and instead intensely study the truths that Jesus gave to mankind. God Bless.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amen, and I really appreciated your well thought out direct message and will be responding, but later in the day, or tomorrow if I run out of time. I have a lot on my plate today. Blessings.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    CONT-5 Thanks to Roman Emperor Constantine, and his influence on the First Council of Nicaea 325 A.D., Pharisee Saul/Paul's doctrine had been adopted by the Council, rather than that of the doctrine preached by Jesus, His Apostles and all those whom they trained. Two glaring facts support that statement: 1 - prior to convening the Council, it is recorded in history that Constantine ordered the confiscation of all of Jesus doctrine that had been known to be in circulation; CONT-6

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I applaud the work you are doing, and as His humble servant, I call upon Almighty God, through His Son, Christ Jesus, to abundanly Bless the Godly work you are doing. Amen.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your comment. It is very unlikely Apostle Peter would have called Pharisee Saul / Paul a dear brother, for there is a mountain of biblical evidence which makes it very clear Pharisee Saul / Paul preached doctrine that was totally contrary to that which was being preached by Peter and the other Apostles, and those whom they trained. CONT-1

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    CONTINUED-1 Actually 5:17-19 all tell one story: Verse 18 tells us: not one jot will be changed; and Verse 19 tells us, “Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments;” however, when one reads Verse 19, they have no commandments to refer to other than the Hebrew Laws of the OT. CONTIN-2

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That’s an excellent question, which the King James Bible cannot adequately answer, due to the corruption within it. Jesus, in His Gospel recorded by Apostle John, taught souls experience many lifetimes to achieve the purification required to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven; He also taught God will forgive souls who are truly sorry and repent, but if they commit the sin again, they will be bound to it and would have been better off had they not asked for forgiveness to begin with. CONTINUED-1

  • @ajsparkman
    @ajsparkman 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What are you using as your source of unquestionable truth? You've turned the bible upside down. You're saying the law of sacrifice is not of God, but that the prophesy of the antichrist in Daniel is actually Jesus?

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Andy Sparkman
      Thank you for your comments, Andy Sparkman. Sine 2005 I have spent 100’s of hours in research, study and cross referencing of numerous biblical resources God led me to, which He confirmed to me thru 3 physical signs, each two years apart. They came in July 2010, July 2012 and July 2014, and full disclosure is on my website: RodCDavis.com. I encourage you to read them.
      The aforementioned resources God led me to, confirmed that both the Old and New Testaments of the King James and Catholic Bibles have been severely corrupted by men to suit their needs and traditions. Further, there is a plethora of biblical evidence which proves beyond doubt that the blood covenant of Exodus 24, and the blood sacrifice rituals and laws for the atonement of sin in Exodus 29:10-42, are not of God, but of men to suit their needs and traditions.
      God IS of love, and being so He wouldn’t have ordained the cruel blood covenant of Exodus 24:8 and the blood sacrifice rituals and laws of Exodus 29. Also, Jesus preached He'd end the blood sacrifice yet that fact is not in the New Testament. Check Daniel 8:11 & 9:27, then Isaiah 1:11-13, and then Jeremiah 7:22, and compare those lessons to the lessons in Exodus 24:4 & 7-8 and 29:10-42.
      Malachi 3:6 makes it very clear God does not contradict Himself, yet those verses reveal diametrically opposing lessons, which means only one side of each of the contradicting lessons can be of God.
      By the way, I have calculated the times given in prophecy in Daniel 9:24-27, and I know beyond doubt that the prophecies in Daniel, Chapters 8 and 9, absolutely are prophecy that Jesus came into the world to fulfill, and did fulfill. Should you calculate the times given in prophecy given in Daniel 9:24-27, you will know that Jesus did indeed fulfill prophecy, and end the daily sacrifice right on time, in the midst of the week, as foretold in 9:27.
      Andy Sparkman, I'm not about religion for God didn’t create religion: man did. Jesus taught man did such to suit their needs and traditions. In addition, Jesus prophesied His Doctrine would be altered, and things would be taught in His Name that He didn’t teach; Apostle Peter in His epistle to Apostle James wrote it happened.
      Humbly serving God thru 3 physical signs I mentioned, I lead TRUTH seekers to Jesus’ Doctrine hidden by Apostle John to protect it from falsification, and found by Catholic priests in 1870. Vatican Cardinals chose to not make it public as it contained doctrine not authorized by the First Council of Nicaea 325 AD, as they feared the crucial contradictions it contains, would have an adverse effect on the Church.
      In addition to Jesus' Gospel by Apostle John, 2 other resources absolutely prove God’s Word and Jesus’ Doctrine have been severely corrupted. Get the facts at RodCDavis.com.
      I encourage you to intensely study with an unbiased mind the Gospel of the Holy Twelve: www.rodcdavis.com/Cause---GH12.html, and to verify its authenticity, I urge you to intensely study The Clementine Homilies, for the messages of the lessons contained in it, mirror the messages of the lessons within the Gospel of the Holy Twelve: www.rodcdavis.com/Cause---The-Clementine-Homilies.html.
      Further corroboration to the corruption within the Bible, and those directly responsible, is documented in this writing: The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God:
      This explosive accounting ordained by God, as a Bible study guide, and confirmed by Him through 3 physical signs, methodically reveals through referenced biblical resources, the fact that changes were made by men to His Word, to suit their needs and traditions. It also brings to light certain doctrine crucial to salvation that's not in the New Testament, which Jesus had given in fulfillment of the Jeremiah 31:31 prophecy: Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel.
      Jesus, as did Prophets before Him, preached against certain revered Hebrew Laws of Genesis and Exodus. However, as I mentioned, due to the co-conspiring between the previously identified parties in 325 AD, none of the doctrine Jesus preached that contradicted revered Hebrew Law, is found within the New Testament.
      The eBook can be ordered thru this link: dld.bz/CrucialBibleInfo
      I pray you take the initiative to intensely study that which I have shared.
      Peace and love in Christ Jesus’ Name.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Faris, I know there are many writings regading Paul, and I do not know which contains the information you're seeking. Sorry I couldn't help, but if you should find it, I'd appreciate it if you'd share it with me. God Bless.

  • @wayner8640
    @wayner8640 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    and will write it on their hearts. I'll be their God and they will be my people.” In Matt 22:36-40, Jesus answers the question of “what is the greatest commandment?” with the reply of loving God and Your neighbor. Is this the “new law” you refer to?

  • @jimmyslegit
    @jimmyslegit 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    and what was the reason for his death?

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    CONTIN-6 When Constantine convened and presided over the First Council of Nicaea 325 AD to determine authorized church doctrine, which he did to bring the various religious factions together, he endorsed Saul / Paul’s doctrine over that of Jesus to satisfy the hard-line Jews who vehemently defended the doctrine Jesus preached against, which by the way, the fact He preached against certain of the Jews’ revered Hebrew Laws, is the factual reason they demanded the Romans to crucify Him. CONTINUED-7

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tks for your comment; I disagree. Christians worldwide unquestionably follow Paul’s preachings & they firmly believe Jesus appeared to Pharisee Saul as recorded in Acts. There’s a ton of biblical evidence, backed up by OT prophecies that create way more than reasonable doubt regarding Paul’s apostleship & the doctrine he preached. This dot com Documentary @ RodCDavis: Paul’s 14 Epistles Vs Jesus Doctrine & OT Prophecies He Fulfilled, is dedicated to the presentation of that evidence. GBU

  • @wayner8640
    @wayner8640 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    There were MANY conflicting writings and claims made in the post Jesus years and for that reason Irenaeus canonized the writing that could be verified as authentic through the disciples of the apostles. He was taught by Polycarp who was a disciple of Apostle John and appointed by him as Bishop in Smyrna. Papias was also a disciple of John's. These knew other apostles as well. Irenaeus canonized these works and rejected what was not authorized by the disciples.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    CONT-1 In his epistle to James, Peter made it clear Jesus’ Doctrine was being altered even then, to suit the needs and traditions of men, and fretted about how it would be protected after he was no longer there to do it. The Homilies also contains a record of the doctrine Peter preached, and those lessons mirror those recorded by Apostle John. Thank you again, and God Bless.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    CONT-1 Pharisees and scribes were protectors of Hebrew Laws, and would take any and all measures to maintain the integrity of them. God and Jesus knew that to be a fact, as in Matthew, Jesus identified Pharisees and being a brood of vipers. Saul certainly lived up to that statement, as he hunted, persecuted and was directly responsible for the imprisonment and/or death of many Jews who subscribed to, and/or taught the doctrine Jesus preached. Why did he do that? CONT-2

  • @galatianssixseven746
    @galatianssixseven746 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Since you say Peter must have been talking about Paul when it came to false teaching in that document, did Peter not write, in 2 Pe 3:15, "And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;," or was Peter lying for some reason? Was 2 Peter written by someone else pretending to be him? Either way, if this is so, this means we need to toss most of the entire NT, and Christianity with it.

  • @jimmyslegit
    @jimmyslegit 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks,last question to you brother,do u still eat and drink dairy products?

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    [CONT-7] The Homilies also contains a record of the doctrine Peter preached, which was recorded by Clement of Rome, a Church Father who had been trained and appointed by Peter, and that doctrine mirrors that which is contained in the Gospel recorded by Apostle John. Links to all the aforementioned are in the description of this video. God Bless

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    CONT-3 Through my 100s of hours of research and studies, I have found that 3 resources can be utilized to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the lessons contained in King James and Catholic Bibles have been severely corrupted, and they are: 1 - King James Bible, KJV / Catholic Bible printed during the same time period; 2 - the Gospel of the Holy Twelve; and 3 - The Clementine Homilies. Links are in the description section of this video. God Bless.

  • @northwestlove8835
    @northwestlove8835 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Revelation 5:9-10 KJV
    "And they sang a new song, saying:
    You are worthy to take the scroll
    and to open its seals,
    because you were slain,
    and with your blood you purchased for God
    persons from every tribe and language and people and nation.
    You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God,
    and they will reign on the earth.”
    By the blood of Jesus Christ our sins are forgiven. Period. Also why do you use Saul's past to discredit and disqualify him from being able to be touched, transformed and used by the grace of God?

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for your comment. Believing a lie does not make it a truth, and chapter 11 of The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God, absolutely proves, way beyond doubt, that a soul must earn its salvation. Jesus preached against the blood sacrifices of the law in Exodus chapter 29:10 through 42, and that is the factual reason the Jews demanded His crucifixion. God sent many prophets to correct the changes men made to His Word handed down to mankind through Holy Spirit. Jeremiah 7:22, and Isaiah 1:11-12 are just a couple of examples. In addition, Jeremiah 8:8 makes very clear the lying pen of scribes changed God's Word. The book I mentioned is available through Amazon and bookstores around the world. Peace and love in Jesus' Name.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I receive and as you, "I pray for whatever higher light to descend upon the both of us, and to all of our family and friends, and even our enemies." Jesus taught one must pray for those who hate or misuse them, and He set example when He prayed to His Father to forgive and restore Judas, after he betrayed Him. Brother, through your faith and prayer, the higher light WILL descend upon you. I have already experienced it, and the experience was WONDROUS! I recorded an accounting of it. God Bless.

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    CONT-1 I have spent 100s of hours researching and studying resources that I had been brought to through Divine Guidance, which are in addition to the King James and Catholic Bibles, and those resources prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that as I already mentioned, Pharisee Saul could not have been appointed to an apostleship by Jesus or His Father. CONT-2

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul preached doctrine Jesus did not preach, for Jesus, in fulfillment of Jeremiah 31:31-33, gave to mankind new laws, certain of which contradicted revered, longstanding Hebrew Laws that had their beginnings in Genesis and Exodus. Keeping that in mind, there is more to your quote, “I come, not to abolish the Law, but to fulfill the Law;” which came from Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, as it is recorded in Matthew 17. CONTINUED-1

  • @nvwriter
    @nvwriter  12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I appreciate your positive feedback and humbly thank you. God Bless.

  • @jimmyslegit
    @jimmyslegit 11 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Alright thanks and don't need any more answers I'm off to study I appreciate your assistance to the TRUTH, god bless you

  • @willempasterkamp862
    @willempasterkamp862 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    +Rod C. Davis, Islam has no bloodsacrifice. They say the jews corrupted the OT and jesus never died. Question one; Do you agree that Islam is following jesus teachings upon this subject? Question two; Do you follow mohammed?

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My educated answer to both is no, and thru my studies it is my opinion that mohammad is a false prophet. Peace and love in Jesus' Name.

    • @creedway1791
      @creedway1791 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Now that some of jesus teachings are corrupted we can't confirm everything , but looking closly in booth i say that their teaching are very close

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I disagree with you - Jesus' teachings can absolutely be confirmed, and this writing absolutely proves that fact: dld.bz/GetGodsBook

  • @Rick-zw7zv
    @Rick-zw7zv 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh (Paul), and hath nothing in me. Jhn14:30
    The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field; but while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat and went his way. - The servants said to him, ‘Do you want us then to go and gather them up?’ But he said, ‘No, lest while you gather up the tares you also uproot the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rick, sadly it is you who has been duped, and if you want to know truth and not that which you have been brainwashed with, then Chapter 7 of this writing proves way beyond doubt, men appointed Pharisee Saul to his apostleship, and not God or Jesus: The Miracle of Three Physical Signs from God, available thru Amazon and bookstores around the world. Study and be enlightened, or don’t and remain deceived. Peace and love in Jesus’ Name.

  • @krystenchambers306
    @krystenchambers306 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Yeshua was Essene..Not understanding the essene way is a problem. The elohim are more then one creators. Essene books must be read. Thank you for this video very much. Rod c. Davis..

    • @nvwriter
      @nvwriter  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Krysten Chambers You are welcome, Krysten Chambers, and thank you for your feedback. And I totally agree with that which you shared. Peace and love in Christ Jesus' Name.

  • @Gardenoftruthandlies
    @Gardenoftruthandlies 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent job Rod. Your video on Paul is the TRUTH. I have proved it by the Gospel of the Holy Twelve, Clementine Homily's, and the Essene Gospel of Peace.