MashaAllah. Such a wonderful discourse that clears up so many questions that not only new Muslims have but born Muslims too. I really appreciate the way Dr Shadee is speaks so respectfully about groups that hold different opinions from his own. These kinds of discourses are valuable and much needed in the Ummah
Also if you edit in the speaker has deviance in shirk and it's better to view AbdurRahman Hasan Athari vs Ashari to learn Aqida based on evidence, that will be awesome.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 why are you commenting this everywhere. you clearly didn't understand the video. regardless, I'm not interested in the school of theology you're promoting
@@----f Do you say you don't follow Quran & sunna as that I promote 1st, not any school. I still have to finish the video but this is a post to show errors of the speaker in Tawhid, sahaba were one aqida (6 pillars of iman) and one usul. They differed in fiq (details of 5 pillars of Islam)
Also if you edit in the speaker has deviance in shirk and it's better to view AbdurRahman Hasan Athari vs Ashari to learn Aqida based on evidence, that will be awesome.
This is my first video of Jan and I instantly subscribed because even as a born muslim guy i never had the chance to learn about different Aqeedah concepts in details like this before. Love this brother Jan for the sake of Allah subhanallahtala. Hope to see 1000s of attendees in your masjid InshaAllah.
Ma Shā Allāh. May Allāh bless you, brother Jan. What you are doing in your country is a real struggle. May Allāh make you from the revivers of this religion and grant you ease and divine support. Raees, your brother from South Africa.
58:20 Islam and worldwide cultures are compatible. Islam is a religion for the whole Humanity. When Islam came to Persia, the Persians didnt all of a sudden started wearing turbans and thobes and started eating arabic food. They kept their culture with a new Islamic identity.
After learning Islam for years , I came with a conclusion that Allah preserved Al-Quran through Sayyidina Uthman Ibn Affan , Fiqh through Imam Hanafi, Imam Maliki, Imam Syafie, Imam Hanbali. Tawheed through Imam Ash'ari Walmaturidi , Attahaawi . 'Ilmu Al-Ihsan (Tasawwuf) Imam Ghazali. Alhamdulillah the majority of Islam today either from the 4 Mazhab and also the Aqeedah of Ash'ari Walmaturidi 😊
I don't know you but for the benefit of all let me put up some clarification here: 1. Ibne Taymiyah DOES not differ with the hanabila (the atharis) in usool of aqeeda. He might have different conclusion from some of them in the furoo' of the aqeeda , i.e the specifics of the subsidiary issues similar to how ashaaira have differred from each other in usool and furoo of aqeeda with each other. To be precise, Razi differs from ghazaali, ghazaali differs from Baaqilaani to the extent that no two ash'ari aalim are unanimous on the usool and furoo of their aqeeda! Read the works of Al-Amidi where he suspends most of the issues and is unable to reach a conclusion on aqeeda as he founds ash'ari scholars on both sides of the spectrum! So Dr.Shadee's claim that atharis have a different aqeeda than Shaikhul Islam ibne taymiyah is a purely bogus claim. Second, go read safareeni for yourself and you will see how they take aqeeda from shaikhul Islam. Third, Dr.Shadee says that the Hanabila just read the text and pass on without implying any meaning from the text and this is pure lie! and let me give you the simplest example to portray my case. The biggest skirmish between the hanabila and the mu'tazila was related to the kalaam (speech) of Allah azz wa jall and the mu'tazila did figurative interpretation of the meaning of 'kalaamullah' (word/speech of God) as 'a speech created by God' but the hanabila objected to it and insisted on it being haqiqatan kalamullah (real speech of Allah) the point here is that the mu'tazila would not have any qualms with the atharis/hanbalis had they been just passing the attributes without implying a meaning to it that too a real meaning (haqeeqatan). And same goes for hand and other attributes of Allah. In fact if you read the debates between mu'tazila and imam Ahmad you would clearly see them accusing imam Ahmad of tajseem and believing that Allah is above the seven heavens above his arsh! So no point in criticising imam Ahmad had he been passing on istiwa without the real meaning attached to it! So ponder and do not be like herd with no aql!
Brother, what the Shaykh said was true. The ulema of Asha'irah mazhab, were many, they have their understanding and opinions according to the al-Quran and hadith. They're different in some small opinions not from the main or the ushul of the aqeedah. It's different with the Salafi Wahhabi understandings. The majority of the ummah, are with the Ash'ari and Maturidi. Ibn Taimiyyah gave birth to Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab (Wahhabi) teachings in Nejd. And now Wahhabi, is the main mazhab in Saudi. They're the offshoot of Hanabilah. And throughout centuries, deviant understanding of Islam came from offshoots of Hanabilah. Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal was a great Imam, but his mazhab are always in the tribulations and fitnah through the ages.
Maybe the thing that Dr Shadee didn't mention is that the first thing Muslims did whenever they conquer a country or a city they build a Masjid there to be the center where new Muslims learn their religion, lots of the companions immigrated there to teach people, and among the first three generations after the prophet peace be upon him and his companions, people immerged that do "Ijtihad" for themselves first to try and understand what Allah wants them to do and behave in new scenarios that didn't existed before, and how the prophet peace be upon him would deal with those issues if he was there with them, so they investigate the Quran and Hadith and try to understand it like the companions did, because the companions lived with the prophet for so long and know him and know how he thinks and how he would deal with new unprecedented matters, those "ijtihadat" is what becomes later "Fiqh", and it like legislation, so independent scholars produced "Fiqh" to benefit themselves and do things as much as Allah want based on Quran, Sunnah, and what the companions agreed on. Madhabs are the way of making that "ijtihad" based on great scholars and all of them are outside the Arabian peninsula except Malik who lived in Medina, and it wasn't only four madhabs in the beginning, there was lots of great scholars alongside with Malik, ibn Hanbal, AlShafii, and Abu Hanifa, but their students weren't as good as the others and they didn't spread it and evolve it, like Al Aozaai, Al Thawri and many others, the state never interfered with scholars' "ijtihadat" and "Fiqh" remained the source of legislation, doing the job of parliament until 19th century when the Ottoman empire changed that by bringing western laws and becoming "a modern state" causing the majority of Muslim ummah to be affected by modernity and what came after it, and causing the state to be collapsed a few decades after that. The difference between modern laws and "Fiqh" is that scholars used reasoning and have both evidence from Quran and Sunnah and rational reasons that have more benefits and less harm to people and environment, because Shari'a law is a moral law to begin with. While modern laws produced by politicians who're in the majority of them are liberals and secular only see the political interests regardless of the moral aspect of it, without any justification, the majority said so then we're going to do it.
Very important topic. I didnt know about aqeeda until i started watching salafi/ahle hadith videos, got a bit confused by what they said before i only knew basics and i think basic is enough for me. Hanafi in madhab and basic aqeeda from Quran and sunnah
@@saracentiano they also mixed in some of there errors too but to a lesser degree. Sh. ebn Hanbal himself also refuted them. Imam Ashari was raised mutazili and later followed ebn Kulab and then even later followed Imam Barbahari & students of Sh. ebn Hanbal!
When you see these different sects(not madhabs), then you will discover that it is the innovations that divided the ummah. The Mutaridi and Asharis are basically reformed Sufis/Mutazilas. Unfortunately, remnants of the beliefs they endeavoured to reform, remained with them. So you see Deobandis split into Mutaridi and Asharis. They are close but also have differences that cause big arguments between them. I would say, take the clearest route. The route of no innovations, the middle way, the route that do not need philosophical explanations but solely rely on authentic Hadith. I really believe the simple Muslim is better off than the the one who follow controversial matters. Please see surah 3 verse 7. Allah Almighty dues not expect us to know the answers to everything. People like some philosophers have gone astray by looking for unnecessary interpretations. Allah is All hearing, All seeing , Never sleeps . He SWT is not like his creation and he merely says Be and it Is. If Allah talks about His hand , His foot.etc. Rest assured it is not like your hand and foot. Allah says he is above His throne, He descends to the lowest heaven in the last part of the night then put a full stop to this sentence. It is matters of the unseen that is not going to benefit anybody for having opinions about it. Choose Sallaffiya. Not extreme Salafis . The creed of all the 4 imams were the same. They followed the Sunnah and the companions of the first 3 generations. May Allah SWT guide us. Islam is simple but the Thinkers and innovators complicated it.
Maturidi is a name that is given to hanafis by there opponent, they used to call themselves "ahlus sunnat" or "ahlul haqq" This is how hanafis describes themselves when they are dealing the aqeedah matters But later on they start to be called maturidis because imam abul mansur almaturudi was the one, who defended hanafi aqeeda standpoints by reasons and debates Aftersometime maturidies said, no problem, its doesn't matters if we are called maturidis and they accepted the name If you want to learn hanafi aqidahs, then take the book "alaqeedah attahawyyiah" Imam tahawi was a from the family of one of the greatest students of imam shafii Imam tahayi has written in this book the aqeeda of abu hanifa, and his two greatest students abu usuf and muhammed and its very simple and easy
Imam Abdul Wahab Rahimullah wrote excellent books on Tawheed etc. The ones who brand people Wahabis, did not read his books. Everything he wrote is backed up by Quran and authentic Hadith.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 The Salafists has nothing to do with Dahawi Aqida, they're just using him because he is Salf, to be sure just google this : (where the Tahawi Aqida contradicts the Salaf) and look what the Salafists are saying about him
everything is the same for me... the important thing is that we carry out everything based on the provisions outlined in the Qur'an and the Hadiths.There will always be differences... So Tabayyun knowledge is necessary, so that we can respect each other.
Ash’ari - I’m gonna deny certain things Allah says about himself and Affirm other things. The things I deny are things that seem like creation. But the things I affirm also can be applied to creation but I’m gonna pick and choose. Athari - I’m gonna affirm everything Allah affirms about himself and just not think about it too much cause my human brain can’t grasp it.
Dear Jan, Assalaam alaikum. This is a brilliant playlist/series idea that you are doing with Shaikh Yasir and Shaikh Shadee and others to come. Will you name this Basics of Islam 101 or introduction to Islam for reverts/everyone?
13:16 the ulama of ahlussunnah wal jamaah in the world do this (combining Ashari-Maturidi into one). This is easier for laymen who want to learn from scratch. If the want to go deeper, they'll know the difference once they are ready (at the certain level). That decrease the ignorants to speak what they don't know. That's the contrary in the salafi-wahabi movement.
may Allah s.w.t make things easier for ur effort akhi.. aammiiiiiinn… btw the place i reside also consists of mixed race n background… may Allah unite us muslims all over the world… aammiiiiiinn..
That’s false . That’s extremely false . The 4 madahabs founders were all Atharis . What the hell are you saying 😂. They even made takfir on people who has similar beliefs 😂
@@MohdShahAbdullah there is no such things as Whabi. I can tell you grave worshipers share your opinion . Go look and see what each madhab said about Allah being above the throne . They all all affirmed this . Not only said they said there was ijmaa on it.
There are Ashaira imam who where confused by their own aqeeda. The legend of Ashaira was Imam Juwayni. He repented from his own aqeeda. Atharee Imams. I never heared anyone on LEGEND level repenting from Atharee salafe aqeeda. If this doesnt tell you something. You are basically lacking objectivity and basic born rationality. One of approaches I use in judging aqeeda is evidence from their teachings, lies and did anyone repented from his own aqeeda. Its very un orthodox approach in judgement. But this is the CLOSEST to objectivism. Salam to you brother. Call Muhammed Ali Aka The muslim Lantern on your podcast. He can be a great guest for you for questioning about Aqeeda
Mashallah Jan May Allah keep you steadfast in faith. 1 thing don't go deep into aqeedah and stuff..always keep in mind that your aqeedah is the aqeedah of ahlus sunnat wal jamaah (whatever that aqeedah is out there) and then pick a maddhab
Jazak allah to both of you. May allah preserve you both. Brother jan. I come from a bosnian muslim background. I think you may need to create a connection with muslims in bosnia. There are many similarities in the bosnian and Slovak language and culture. The bosnians generally follow the hanafi medhab. Selam.
He is not an aqidah scholar. Better to bring someone who has done phDs in Ibn Taymmiyah and Aqidah. Like e.g. Shaikh Yasir Qadhi. Pure Hanabalite who is also anti-Wahhabi.
@@saracentiano - Yasir Qadhi who was a guy who doubted the preservation of Quran yet he was sopposedly a hafeth. This guy who didn't know du'a to the qubur is shirk, Subahan Allah. Quran 4 :82 if it was from other than Allah is would contradict! Learn Usul after Aqida & Manhaj!
Second lie :" the athari aqida is just hanabila who did not want to answer questions brought up by "satan" while the asharies where willing to take up the challenge" , what nonesense is this. (19:50 - 21:40 ).........Now responding to the second lie athari means : divine text first, quran and sunnah with the understanding of salaf el ummah (meaning the first three generations of muslims) as they where praised to be the best of all generations by the prophet himself in a authentic hadeeth. Okay so an ashari will also come and say i also stick to the quran and sunnah , well lets test this claim, asharis have to stick to the quran and sunnah ofcourse they cannot openly say they reject divine text when coming to aqida issues like what are the attributes of god for example, however they openly say and it's very popular amongst their books we put logic and philosophy first and then the divine text would be judged and understood by the logical and philosophical principles we put (by the way for someone who is well educated , will know that these philosophical and logical principles were originated by the greeks ) okay so whats the problem with that ? Why not make logic and philosophy be the judge to the divine text and make them also the determining factor of what the text should mean ? well simply put the consequenses of doing so are horrific, these priciples lead them to deny the attributes of god and some of his actions which are clearly stated in the quran just because their minds can not comprehend the how of it ... by the way we are not asked to know the how of any of the atributes of god we are just obliged to belive in the meanings of the clear arabic words in the quran when it comes to the attributes of god specifically and everything else generaly , Asharis on the contrary they denied the divine attributes and did not affirm any of them except seven, because they could be proven rationally, or so they claimed. They denied Allah’s rising above the Throne (istiwaa’), His being exalted above His creation, and they said: He is neither within nor without the universe, neither above it nor below it… And there were other differences too. So how can we call them Ahl as-Sunnah?
Yes brother. This interview was like a sheep inviting a wolf to misguide and misinform his flock. Ash'ariyya creed has tons of holes and is easily debunked by someone with knowledge and sincerity.
I’m Saudi so I was raised as Salafi but in my 20’s I started to question my beliefs so I decided to not be attached to any Salafis ideas because it doesn’t encourage to ask logic questions about aqeedah and religion in general until I learned after 10 or more years that Islam is based on Quran and Sunnah and the best school that treated with by authentication and explanation them is the Athari school so I came back to become Salafi again not by inheritance only but by searching and learning
As salaamu alaykum brother Jan. Today's Asharis have a lot of Sufi innovations. They believe prophet Muhammad SAW can be present but we cannot see him. It is not very different from the mainstream Sufies that says prophet Muhammad SAW is indeed omnipresent. This is how they hang on to Sufi beliefs. I understand that Imam Ashari repented and adopted the Hanbali creed before he died.
@@muslim5067He did not repent that is a common lie that is spread by some Salafis. Ibn Taymiyyah himself was also a sufi but I agree that some Sufis can have extreme beliefs that go against the Sharia
Hanbalis are often mis-labeled as hard liners, staunch literalists and traditionalists, because from among them are a few Wahabis and self proclaimed Salafis (who should not be confused with the first 3 generations of pious Muslim ancestors), especially considering that "the Salafi's" scholar of reference doesn't go back any further than Ibn Taymiyah. And Imam Hambal himself never attempted to give an interpretation for any of the descriptions and attributes of Allah (correct me if im wrong). Imam Malik, Imam Hanafi and Imam Shafi'ite were also of this opinion concerning the verses of Allah's attributes, because Allah cannot be encompassed, as is stated in the Quran. All of them were scholars who accepeted the verses as literal but refused to explain through rational means like metaphor as to what those attributes looked like, whether they contained depth and took up space, whether a body was in a direction and philosophical arguments such as these. Imam Hanbal never claimed these arguments and in fact fought against them. The other 3 madhabs in various degrees differed with Imam Hanifa's use of rational deduction (in fact Imam Hanifa's tools of human intellect were not widely popular at first) but today that madhab is considered the majority madhab subhanallah. Malikis were once upon a time a widely popular madhab and it enjoyed a little more acceptance and less scrutiny because it was seen as the school of thought of Medina. It is interesting when one does an indepth cursory study of how Islamic scholarship can take on many forms, depending on what the debate of the time is, for example, one can be Hambali and Ashari now, but at one time it would have been preferrable to be Hambali and Athari in creed because the rationalist Mu'tazilite philosophers were essentually the state-run enforcers of religious thought in Baghdad and they were brutal dictators. Rationalists by today's standards are Hanafis with a Tassawuf leaning and today its the Saudi state funded Hanbali-Salafis who are seen as too strict and not balanced in their approach. Imam Malik was himself seen as a traditionalist, so much so that he confined himself to the practices of the Sunna in Medina, a very traditionalist Athari in creed. Your favorite imam of whatever madhab all testify that Imam Malik's chain of narrations and teachers were the best (and in Imam Malik's time there were plenty of dialectic theologians then as well, and he studied under them for more than a decade, but despite that he did not accept the aqeeda of people like Ibn Humuz). But despite Imam Malik being against anthropomorphic beliefs of any kind, he did believe that Allah would be seen one day, as is described in Surah 75 Verses 22 and 23 and that Allah will only be veiled to the transgressors (Surah 83 verse 15).
Narrated 'Abdullah bin Mas'ud:that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "The best generation is my generation, then those who follow them, then those who follow them. Then comes a people after that whose swearing precedes their testimony, or whose testimony precedes their swearing Hadith Sahih the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) “Every Innovation is misguidance and every misguidance is in the (Hell)Fire.” [Saheeh Muslim,
It just a gift.(clothing) Not asking to change your culture. If changing name, it just if the old name having bad meaning. To be imam is to be a leader and to be imam at least you have ilmu-knowledge. New masjid normally learn from other masjid do and improvise some according to the culture.
Alhamdulilah for Dr Shadee. We need knowledgeable shaykhs especially in these times. For those wanting to criticize him: Youre not scholarly qualified to do so. Youre not educated. When the Shaykh speaks, you listen.
@@SIGSEGV1337The "DOCTOR" title should tell you everything you need to know, but for some reason your brain aint computing. This is exactly what the wahabis/salafis do, they see a man with a beard and a thobe and think hes a Shaykh without ever questioning his credentials. Every major salafi I see online has no Islamic degree or Ijiziyah.
@@SIGSEGV1337YT keeps deleting my comments. Look at his title, it says "Doctor". He has a Phd in Islamic studies and ijizya from multiple shaykhs from the Middle East. You wahabis never ask your preachers what qualifications they have, as long as they have a beard and wear a thobe in your mind hes a shaykh. This is wrong.
@@khairt1731 Ah well of course if he has a particular label bestowed upon him by the filthy status quo then he MUST BE trustworthy /s. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a salafi. We do not need garbage credentialism because our scholars tell us about the Qur'an and sunnah and we disagree with them freely.
@@SIGSEGV1337 whos "we"? And why are you as a layman disagreeing with SCHOLARS? This is ignorance at the highest level. Youre not scholarly qualified to speak. The only thing you can do is ask Questions to scholars. You barely graduated high school.
Tawhid/ Sunni creed is balance. Affirm Allah's Attributes as perfect (Quran 16 :60) to negate atheism. Negate Likeness (Quran 42 :11) Also negates polytheism. Quran 16 :60 ties Allah's Siffat with Akira when Allah is seen which Jahmiyah deny! View time Line, - Qadriya denied Allah has knowledge of future saying how can Allah allow evil, but story of Kidr shows things appear eviI at first as Allah is All Wise. Qadriya are called Majews of umma who believe in god of light & darkness who guides all eviI acts. - Mutaziliah say Allah's Siffat are parts like the pagans in Quran 53 :19 tafsir which says Allah's name al Aziz was turned into the idol Uzza. - Kulab Asharis confirm the Qadr but follow Qadriya & Mutazilah using foreign idea of Aristotle to say Allah's Siffat Qabr specifically are parts & isolating Allah's Attributes! If we use foreign ideas of limited knowledge it wil only lead to division (Quran 4 :82) which is why when Ashari sofia bida increased in Uthmani empire it lead to secularism!
@@izharcohen4572 Yet prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him said I am the best salaf in Bukhari kitab of asking, I guess he is modern to you, which is clearly faIse btw. Where is proof for such a claim?
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543bro that hand ( Yadh) question is not relevant to this worldly life, we believe in Allah, let’s not discuss this issue, bro
@@Khairuddin313 Asalam Aleik bro. Thanks, H/e it effects Iife & more importantly Akira (Quran 16.60). If ppl can make & reject ayat we will split & need unity so it's haram in Quran 3.103. Like Qadriya who deny Allah Knows the future saying how can Allah allow eviI, but like in story of Musa & Kidr we see things look eviI but Allah is all Wise too. Attributes define each other.
@@Khairuddin313 Salaf were Athari. A. Quran 16.60 - Affirm Allah's Attributes as Perfect & true rejects atheism & ties to akira. B. Quran 42.11 - Negate likeness to reject Polytheism - Tauhid balance. C. Quran 7.33 - Leave what Allah has, don't affirm or negate. Tawil w/ Quran, sunna only. Some Ashari see Allah's Attributes like Allah's Face as Tashbi & deny seeing Allah which is in Quran 75.22. This matches eviI in Quran 16.60 in denying akira. How can any of Allah's Attributes be tashbi when Allah is as al A.wwal or the 1st This is important as this shows respect to Quran & sunna to follow it, & shows we can't contradict it & we all error but when we error fix it or we will divide.
My brother Jan, I know how you feel. Perhaps the biggest challenge is that you may trust a sheikh or a scholar who may not be trustworthy. Therefore, I remember brother Sajid Libhan. He learned the Arabic language and Sharia law so that he would not have to rely on others to understand Islam, and the Arabic language is the key to Islamic sciences. You should know that some sheikhs are trying to place big obstacles and holes so that you do not achieve the freedom of thinking to reach the absolute truth, but rather you remain dependent on them and fill your mind with what they want. As a lover’s advice to you, you must learn Arabic first, as it is the key to Islamic sciences and access to the first sources in Islamic sciences so that you can compare what is right and wrong. For example, I can distinguish right from wrong even though I have not studied Islamic sciences because it is a simple equation and you can apply it if you doubt anything, which is The question is: What is your evidence from the text of the Qur’an and the Prophet’s hadith, or the four imams in jurisprudence, or the nine imams in hadith, or the ten imams of recitation in the Qur’an? If your sheikh does not extract evidence from these early scholars, stay away from him. Because Islamic aleaqida is simply deduced from the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, and the first scholars who understood the religion from the companions of the Prophet Muhammad, may God’s prayers be upon them and their children. As for the later Muslim scholars, they are not a source for obtaining a new aleaqida or a new interpretation of the Qur’an. Therefore, many deviant sects appeared because of their distance from the understanding that was understood by the companions of the Prophet Muhammad and the early imams who were scholars of jurisprudence, hadith, and readings. Therefore, if you do not want to argue or search for advanced books, ask any Jahmite, Mu’tazili, Shiite, Ash’ari, etc. What is the evidence for what you believe from the text of the Qur’an and the Hadith, the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad and the understanding of the companions of the Prophet Muhammad and the early Muslim scholars? If you find the answer directly, you are with a respected and trusted sheikh. If your sheikh maneuvers and engages you in long philosophical issues from later sheikhs, stay away from him. Can you choose your belief without resorting to asking the sheikhs and without complications? The answer is yes. This is necessary and without the correct aleaqida, how will you meet your Lord? Because some people may be negligent in telling the truth, my brother, your belief must be correct in order to meet your Lord with sound belief and it will be a reason for entering Paradise. Sheikh Abdul Mohsen Al-Qasim, the imam of the Prophet’s Mosque, says that a Muslim must learn the Book of Tawheed by Sheikh Muhammad Abdul Wahhab and the Book of the Wasitiyyah Doctrine in order for the Muslim to meet his Lord with a sound belief. I will explain to you the importance of these books in aleaqida. After you read them, you can decide what is convincing to you based on the rule that we learned, which is the evidence from the Qur’an, the Sunnah, and the understanding of the first generation of Muslims. 1. Explanation of the Book of Tawhid by Ibn Uthaymeen. This book explains Islamic monotheism based on the texts of the Qur’an and Sunnah. Sufis and Shiites object to that book because they believe in the permissibility of requesting intercession from the dead (righteous saints) so that these dead may act as intercessors to the Creator for success, happiness, healing, paradise, etc. Of course, Islamic monotheism is the direct worship of the Creator without an intermediary, whether it is an idol or a grave. Likewise, asking for Paradise from priests, as a form of forgiveness, contradicts Islamic monotheism in the eyes of the Salafists. This book is necessary for you to read and have the mind and intelligence to know what is right and wrong because the methodology of right and wrong I mentioned to you. You will see Sufis warning you not to read this book. Ignore them. It is not a book of magic. Most of it is Quranic texts and hadiths. Then you will know whether it is more appropriate for you to follow the Salafis based on this book or to follow the Sufis and Shiites and what they believe in the righteous dead saints. 2. Explanation of the book The Wasitiyya Doctrine by Ibn Uthaymeen: The Salafists affirm the attributes of the Creator that were mentioned in the texts of the Qur’an and the Prophet’s hadiths, and they say that God is not a creation like Him, based on the understanding of the first generations of Muslims of the Qur’an, and we do not enter into philosophy about the attributes of the Creator because it is a matter of the unseen. Therefore, if God says that He has a hand, we say that God said about Himself that He has a hand, etc. The Ash’arites reject this and say that the speech is similes, etc. The Salafis ask the Ash'aris: What is your evidence that it is an analogy? They start cursing us because we reject the words of Muslim scholars, and they mean the later Ash'ari scholars! For example, God has a throne in heaven based on the texts of the Qur’an. The Ash’aris say that God is everywhere, and this is an analogical text that we do not take textually, etc. Although there is a number of evidence that God is in heaven from the Qur’an and the Prophet’s hadiths, the Ash’ari insist that God is everywhere. We ask them: What is your evidence that God is everywhere? They say you anthropomorphize God? We want their evidence from the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad and his companions. They insult us and accuse us of things we did not say. We encourage God to be everywhere because some places are impure or bad or it is not appropriate for the Creator to be present in them. These are things that we do not accept. Rather, as Salafists, we understand the Qur’an with the understanding of the first generation of Muslims, and we do not enter into a philosophy regarding the attributes of the Creator, but rather we understand the text as it is and as the companions of the Prophet Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, understood it. Therefore, my brother, the first book will explain to you the difference between the Sufis and the Salafists (Al-Athari) in the concept of polytheism or Islamic monotheism in the view of the Salafists, and the second book will explain to you the difference between the (Al-Athari) Salafists and the Ash’aris in the concept of the attributes of the Creator. Do not allow anyone to try to belittle your intelligence or your ability to further seek knowledge from various sources. The most important thing is to learn the Arabic language, and good luck to you. Because there are some Westerners who have also embraced the Shiite doctrine, even though it is far from the correct teachings of Islam, and the reason is his ignorance of the Arabic language and blind trust in the Shiite sheikhs, as well as not reading from other sources to use his mind, and certainly the Shiite sheikhs will say do not read the books of Ibn Taymiyyah, the books of Muhammad Abd al-Wahhab, etc.. To be a puppet for the Shiite sheikhs. Aleaqida’s books have been translated into English, and some are explained on TH-cam, so no one is trying to diminish your ability to absorb and understand books and then criticize or support them, because God gave you the mind to distinguish truth from falsehood based on the established standard, which are the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad and the understanding of Islam by his companions and their children because they are the ones who learned from the Prophet. Muhammad directly and from his companions. These are some books on aleaqida: 1. The Creed of Al-wasitiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah Sharah al Aqeda al Wasitiyah 2 Volume Set by Shykh Muhammad bin Salih Al Uthaimin 2. Explanation of a Summary of Al Aqeedatul Hamawiyyah: Authored by Ibn Taymiyyah 3. Towards Understanding of Tadmuriyyah by Shaykh-Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah 4. Explanation of the Book of Tawheed by Ibn Uthaymeen or Sheikh Al-Fawzan 5. Explanation of the Three Fundamental Principles of Islaam by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-Uthaymeen 6. An Explanation of the Four Rules Regarding Shirk of the Imaam and Mujaddid Muhammad Bin Abdil Wahhab by Luhaydaan Fawzaan 7. Explanation Of Important Lessons For Every Muslim by Shaykh-'Abdur-Razaq Al-Abad
A final issue, my brother. Concerning the differences in the alfiqa, they are issues of ijtihad, meaning the ruling may change with the increase of evidence to give preference to one ruling over another or for the benefit of the Muslims. The four imams, three of whom were students of each other. Therefore, do not be fanatical towards these four imams, but rather be fanatical towards the strongest evidence. For example, in Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia, if they study the Sharia books of the four imams, they may prefer the evidence of the Maliki, Hanafi, or Shafi’i over the ruling of Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal, even though they are Hanbalis, and the reason is the strength of the evidence. But my question to you is that you can ask it to the Ash’aris. Was Imam al-Hanafi an Ash’ari and believed in the attributes of the Creator that the Ash’aris believe in or not? So why do they disagree with the Hanafi imam in aleaqida, which is the most important and the reason for entering Paradise, and are fanatical about his jurisprudential doctrine, which he may make mistakes like the other three imams?
My nation will not unite on misguidance, so if you see them differing, follow the great majority.’” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H3950, here.] “Abu Dhar (Allah be pleased with him) reported from the Prophet (Peace be upon him)that, "Two are better than one, and three better than two; so stick to the Jama'ah for verily Allah, Most Great and Glorious, will only unite my nation on guidance." [Ref: Musnad Ahmad, Kitab Al-Ansar, Abu Zar Al Ghafari, Hadith 20776
47:05 shadee referring to only mutawatir ahadith shows that his ashari position is against the sunnah and is very extreme and misguided. which scholar said to only take mutawatir ahadith?! only kuffaar "quran-only" people do, be aware.
@5:21 What is the required mandatory minimum requirement to form a jamaat for jummah? Can't a Maliki pray in a majority Hanafi group? 3 people including the imam is what makes a jamaat, because in arabic plural three or more is in thr qur’an “ (62:9) O’ Believers, when the call for Prayer is made on Friday, hasten to the remembrance of Allah and give up all trading. That is better for you, if you only knew.” the word AAMANU is in a plural form of 3 or more, and God knows best
السلام علیکم جان صاحب اللہ تعالٰی آپ کو کامیاب بنانے آپ اچھا کام کر رہے ہیں وہ مرد نہیں جو گھبرا جائے حالات کے خونی منظر سے جس دور میں جینا مشکل ہو اس دور میں جینا لازم ہے آپ شہر یا دیہات میں رہتے ہیں گوگل سے دیکھ لیں گے ضرور بتائیں
My nation will not unite on misguidance, so if you see them differing, follow the great majority.’” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H3950, here.] “Abu Dhar (Allah be pleased with him) reported from the Prophet (Peace be upon him)that, "Two are better than one, and three better than two; so stick to the Jama'ah for verily Allah, Most Great and Glorious, will only unite my nation on guidance." [Ref: Musnad Ahmad, Kitab Al-Ansar, Abu Zar Al Ghafari, Hadith 20776 For those who are worried ✨
There was never ashari maturidi or any other aqeedah except one in the time of the messenger ﷺ, we are ordered to follow the quraan and the authentic Sunnah with the understanding of the Companions. May ALLAH rectify our affairs and keep us firm upon the truth. O you who believe! Obey ALLAH and obey the Messenger (Muhammad ﷺ), and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority. (And) if you differ in anything amongst yourselves, refer it to ALLAH and HIS Messenger ﷺ, if you believe in ALLAH and in the Last Day. That is better and more suitable for final determination. Quran 4:49
The Sahaba and Tabi'een gave the meaning of yad as the term hand in some ayat and the idioms of interpretation in others in Tafsir accordingly. This is Athar, not Kalam.
It starts with the wanting more religion, and it ends with wanting less religion. Allah is one. Allah is goodness and everything good you ever lived or felt stems from Allah and goes back to Allah. Love him and worship him that is the whole of the law. Stop thinking that people 1000 years figured it out. Nobody did. Islam is a simple message from a simple humble prophet. These charlatans will make Islam seem so complicated until God forbid you might leave it. I don’t want you to leave it. I’m a native Muslim from Morocco and the above is the whole religion the majority of muslims in Morocco believe in.
"starts with the wanting more religion, and it ends with wanting less religion.' - this is what the batini sofia do, they do zhud in dunya ot shud in ilm and then fill in the vacum of knowledge by making up cuIt like fatwas not based on Quran and sunna, thus misguiding and dividing!
This is what "my heart feels comfortable with" is a very very divisive concept. You end up with as many Divisions as there are people using this concept. The better concept is to Follow The Evidence!
@@saidctbb ....said the stubborn blind brainwashed Hindu, Christian, Athiest, Jew, Zoastrians etc ...let me be where i was born in a state of ignorance and let me not be enlightened by evidence LoL 🤣
No some people delve too much into Philosophy for example and overlay that into Islamic matters and find some concepts ‘uncomfortable.’ We have to be sincere to Allah and if we are uncomfortable we seek his help (with ibadat and specifically Istakhara) and seek the knowledgable scholars
As Wr Wb sorry but you gave the Asharis creed and you have to give also the Atharis concept on this isuues bc we have to be fair they also have a reason for their saying .."we have to believe on those verse in the qur'an like the salaf understand and believed "wout asking the howeness of Allah's attribute and without likeness bc Allah has no likeness"like Allah has hands but wout the likeness to the creation this is the creed of the salaf"
He is Laing to you hanbalis they are forming the sifat of allah all salafis make tanziih of allah and if you read the books of tge salaf before ibn taymiyay you will know that he follows the books of the slaf in the first century and socend centutry ,the ash'ary he makes repentance and wrote 3 books
Abu Dhar said, “I was with the Prophet (Sallal lahu aliwasalam) one day and I heard him saying: “There is something I fear for my Ummah more than the Dajjal.” It was then that I became afraid, so I said: “Oh Rasool Allah! Which thing is that?” He (SAW) said; “Misguided and astray scholars.” (Reference:-Recorded in Musnad Imam Ahmad (no.20335, 21334 and no.21335). Sheikh Shu’ayb al Arna’ut graded it sahih li ghayri (authentic due to corroborating narrations) in his tahqiq of the Musnad (1999 ed., 35:21,296-97) Ziyad ibn Hudayr رضي الله عنه reported:- Umar ibn al-Khattab رضي الله عنه said to me, “Do you know what will demolish Islam?” I said, “No.” Umar رضي الله عنه said, “Islam will be demolished by the faults of scholars, the arguments of hypocrites over the Book, and the judgment of misguided leaders.” [Sunan Al-Darimi, 220] ۩ Umar ibn al-Khattab رضي الله عنه reported:- The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, “Verily, among what I fear most for my nation is every hypocrite with a knowledgeable tongue.” In another narration, Umar رضي الله عنه said, “His tongue is knowledgeable, but his heart and deeds are ignorant.” [Musnad Ahmad] ۩ Thawban narrated that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said:- “I only fear for my Ummah from the misguiding A’immah.”
Yes the misguided wahabis and their slanderous tounges. May Allah protect us from these hypocrites and bigots. Notice how none of the salafi scholars dare not say a word against Saudi promoting music, intermixing of genders and Alcohol.
@@jj-yi1ne There more than one hadith, and these hadith were declared Sahih by Shaykh Arnaut. Here is an example in the quran in Surah Araf which Allah describes a scholar as a panting dog And relate to them ˹O Prophet˺ the story of the one to whom We gave Our signs, but he abandoned them, so Satan took hold of him, and he became a deviant.1 If We had willed, We would have elevated him with Our signs, but he clung to this life-following his evil desires. His example is that of a dog: if you chase it away, it pants, and if you leave it, it ˹still˺ pants. This is the example of the people who deny Our signs.1 So narrate ˹to them˺ stories ˹of the past˺, so perhaps they will reflect. What an evil example of those who denied Our signs! They ˹only˺ wronged their own souls. So, indeed there are scholars who are indeed righteous but then their are scholars who follow their own desires and mislead others. The quran describes these type of scholars like a panting dog which is the worst type of dog. The traded the verses of Allah for a miserable gain how miserable which of that they have chosen. Just because they have been granted a lot of knowledge does not mean they cannot go astray, since shaytan also is knowledgable. Not to say there are indeed many scholars who in the past and present have been righteous but they are some who are astray and lead others astray. It has been said by some companions and tabieen that to beware of scholars who are close to the rulers for they most likely are afflicted by Fitnah.
There are verses in the Quran which describes certain scholars that Allah would have elevated them but they clung to the earth and sold the verses of Allah for a small price. There are few sahabas and tabiens that say that the scholars who are close to the ruler have been exposed to fitnah, so it said to watch out for them. The more distant the scholar is from the ruler the more closer he is to Allah the more closer he is to the Ruler the further he is away from Allah
Correction: so don't get confused if Quran says ALLAH is closer to you than jugular vein at the same time lLIVES above HIS throne. Sorry for no editing before posting.
@@carimaelfarrah7800 I think I misquoted. You might be right. "thumma istawa" doesn't mean "HE lives" but "thumma istawa alal Arshi" or "fawqal Arshi" both doesn't mean 'lives' but more close to ' while being on 'HIS Arsh' OR ON ' TOP OF HIS ARSH'. IN ANYWAY HE IS ALAKBAE, AL QADIR, ALSAMAD, ALAWAL WAL AKHIR. HE IS HAYULQAYUM, THERE IS NOTHING LIKE HIM, HE IS BEYOND WHAT WE CAN REACH WITH OUR PERCEPTION OR INTELLECT. HE KNOWS EVERYTHING AT ANYTIME, EVERYWHERE IN THE UNIVERSE, HE KNOWS THE FUTURE, PRESENT AND THE PAST. HE ENCOMPASSES EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING. NOTHING IS INDEPENDENT FROM HIM AND HE IS SOVEREIGN, EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING NEED HIN BUT HE NEEDS NO ONE AND NOTHING. NOTHING OF YOU IS INDEPENDENT OF HIM, EVEN THE SINGLE VREATH AND BEATS OF YOUR HEART, YOUR HEARING AND SIGHT. EVERYONE IS HIS AND EVERYTHING IS HIS AND EVERYWHERE IS HIS. YOU CANNOT GO OUT OF HIS REALM, YOU CAN'T JUMP FROM HIS DOMINION TO ANOTHER DOMINION. WHY PEOPLE ARGUE ABOUT SUCH THINGS IS BEYOND ME. ALL ESSENCE IS WITH HIM, ALL FUNCTIONS ARE FROM HIM. WE HAVE BEEN GIVEN A LITTLE ONLY.
@@hiraabnews4578 thank you for correcting and clarifying. An important point of aqeeda to understand as expressed by Imam Tahawi is, " The Arsh and the kursi are both real. Yet Allah has no need of the arsh and whatever is beneath it." AND, "He is transcendent beyond limits, ends, supports, components, or instruments. The six directions do not contain Him as they do created things."
@@carimaelfarrah7800 I seems to me that all aqida are correct and there are no fundamental differences but artificial due to limited human intellect and due diligence.
As a born muslim i found this to be a great podcast. Keep doing what you're doing!!
Hear... hear... How will the follow-up of this video be?
Jan, I have been following you for a couple of years now, but I must admit that this was a groundbreaking podcast. May Allah reward you, amin.
really nice?
Akhi Idk what ur reply means, but the brother prayed for you, which requires you to say “ameen, wa iyyak”
MashaAllah. Such a wonderful discourse that clears up so many questions that not only new Muslims have but born Muslims too. I really appreciate the way Dr Shadee is speaks so respectfully about groups that hold different opinions from his own. These kinds of discourses are valuable and much needed in the Ummah
This was a very well-informed and necessary conversation that the muslim online space desperately needed. Thank you for sharing this, brother Jan
view : **Yaqeen Institute Member Says Shirk Is Sunnah**
by - الفرقة الناجية Al-Firqah An-Najiyah
Also if you edit in the speaker has deviance in shirk and it's better to view AbdurRahman Hasan Athari vs Ashari to learn Aqida based on evidence, that will be awesome.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 why are you commenting this everywhere. you clearly didn't understand the video. regardless, I'm not interested in the school of theology you're promoting
@@----f Do you say you don't follow Quran & sunna as that I promote 1st, not any school.
I still have to finish the video but this is a post to show errors of the speaker in Tawhid, sahaba were one aqida (6 pillars of iman) and one usul. They differed in fiq (details of 5 pillars of Islam)
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 are a clown
JazakAllah Slovak muslim you really helping to increase my knowledge
Also if you edit in the speaker has deviance in shirk and it's better to view AbdurRahman Hasan Athari vs Ashari to learn Aqida based on evidence, that will be awesome.
This is my first video of Jan and I instantly subscribed because even as a born muslim guy i never had the chance to learn about different Aqeedah concepts in details like this before. Love this brother Jan for the sake of Allah subhanallahtala. Hope to see 1000s of attendees in your masjid InshaAllah.
Once again
isn't this the guy who supported shirk, not good.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 i didn't see his vid about shirk yet. Can you share the link please.
@@Prizkov99 brother or sister view : **Yaqeen Institute Member Says Shirk Is Sunnah**
by - الفرقة الناجية Al-Firqah An-Najiyah
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Yikes, I had no idea about this side of him. JazakAllah Khairan for the insight brother. I will edit my comment.
Ma Shā Allāh. May Allāh bless you, brother Jan. What you are doing in your country is a real struggle. May Allāh make you from the revivers of this religion and grant you ease and divine support. Raees, your brother from South Africa.
Mashallah much love and respect from Somalia 🇸🇴
58:20 Islam and worldwide cultures are compatible. Islam is a religion for the whole Humanity.
When Islam came to Persia, the Persians didnt all of a sudden started wearing turbans and thobes and started eating arabic food.
They kept their culture with a new Islamic identity.
Yes it took them around 200-300 years to convert wholly and some of our best scholars are Persian
I disagree. Example being Indian culture completely taken from hindu scriptures and is nowhere near compatible with Islam.
@@FaisalKhan-md2tjit depends on the region
After learning Islam for years , I came with a conclusion that Allah preserved Al-Quran through Sayyidina Uthman Ibn Affan , Fiqh through Imam Hanafi, Imam Maliki, Imam Syafie, Imam Hanbali. Tawheed through Imam Ash'ari Walmaturidi , Attahaawi . 'Ilmu Al-Ihsan (Tasawwuf) Imam Ghazali. Alhamdulillah the majority of Islam today either from the 4 Mazhab and also the Aqeedah of Ash'ari Walmaturidi 😊
Brave effort....Allah will give Barakah IA.... Steadfastness with sincerity is the key
جان صاحب آپ کائنات کی تخلیق کا مقصد تلاش کرتے ہوئے آخری منزل پر پہنچ گئے ہیں ماشاءاللہ 🇵🇰ایک پاکستانی مسلمان
As a born muslim this was very informative for me. Jazzak-Allahu khairan
Dr. Shadee is a gem mashallah. I benefited so much from him
Thank you so much for this interview or podcast. Much benefits for us. May Allah bless both Dr Shadee and our bother Jan.
May Allah give you success in this world and the hereafter my brother
This brother's heart is on the right path.
Allah bless you brother Jan! Beautiful discussion between you and Shaykh Elmasry.
I don't know you but for the benefit of all let me put up some clarification here:
1. Ibne Taymiyah DOES not differ with the hanabila (the atharis) in usool of aqeeda. He might have different conclusion from some of them in the furoo' of the aqeeda , i.e the specifics of the subsidiary issues similar to how ashaaira have differred from each other in usool and furoo of aqeeda with each other. To be precise, Razi differs from ghazaali, ghazaali differs from Baaqilaani to the extent that no two ash'ari aalim are unanimous on the usool and furoo of their aqeeda! Read the works of Al-Amidi where he suspends most of the issues and is unable to reach a conclusion on aqeeda as he founds ash'ari scholars on both sides of the spectrum!
So Dr.Shadee's claim that atharis have a different aqeeda than Shaikhul Islam ibne taymiyah is a purely bogus claim.
Second, go read safareeni for yourself and you will see how they take aqeeda from shaikhul Islam.
Third, Dr.Shadee says that the Hanabila just read the text and pass on without implying any meaning from the text and this is pure lie! and let me give you the simplest example to portray my case. The biggest skirmish between the hanabila and the mu'tazila was related to the kalaam (speech) of Allah azz wa jall and the mu'tazila did figurative interpretation of the meaning of 'kalaamullah' (word/speech of God) as 'a speech created by God' but the hanabila objected to it and insisted on it being haqiqatan kalamullah (real speech of Allah) the point here is that the mu'tazila would not have any qualms with the atharis/hanbalis had they been just passing the attributes without implying a meaning to it that too a real meaning (haqeeqatan).
And same goes for hand and other attributes of Allah. In fact if you read the debates between mu'tazila and imam Ahmad you would clearly see them accusing imam Ahmad of tajseem and believing that Allah is above the seven heavens above his arsh! So no point in criticising imam Ahmad had he been passing on istiwa without the real meaning attached to it!
So ponder and do not be like herd with no aql!
Brother, what the Shaykh said was true. The ulema of Asha'irah mazhab, were many, they have their understanding and opinions according to the al-Quran and hadith. They're different in some small opinions not from the main or the ushul of the aqeedah. It's different with the Salafi Wahhabi understandings. The majority of the ummah, are with the Ash'ari and Maturidi. Ibn Taimiyyah gave birth to Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab (Wahhabi) teachings in Nejd. And now Wahhabi, is the main mazhab in Saudi. They're the offshoot of Hanabilah. And throughout centuries, deviant understanding of Islam came from offshoots of Hanabilah. Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal was a great Imam, but his mazhab are always in the tribulations and fitnah through the ages.
Well done bro. Dr. Masree is either blatantly lying or he is uneducated. I hardly beleive he is not educated about these major things
@@yojan9238stop spreading ur Ashari kuffr please.
I agree 💯
Wonderful discussion! Jazaakumullaahu khairan brothers
May Allah Accept your works, and make it a means of acceptance and Guidance for the Ummah!
Maybe the thing that Dr Shadee didn't mention is that the first thing Muslims did whenever they conquer a country or a city they build a Masjid there to be the center where new Muslims learn their religion, lots of the companions immigrated there to teach people, and among the first three generations after the prophet peace be upon him and his companions, people immerged that do "Ijtihad" for themselves first to try and understand what Allah wants them to do and behave in new scenarios that didn't existed before, and how the prophet peace be upon him would deal with those issues if he was there with them, so they investigate the Quran and Hadith and try to understand it like the companions did, because the companions lived with the prophet for so long and know him and know how he thinks and how he would deal with new unprecedented matters, those "ijtihadat" is what becomes later "Fiqh", and it like legislation, so independent scholars produced "Fiqh" to benefit themselves and do things as much as Allah want based on Quran, Sunnah, and what the companions agreed on. Madhabs are the way of making that "ijtihad" based on great scholars and all of them are outside the Arabian peninsula except Malik who lived in Medina, and it wasn't only four madhabs in the beginning, there was lots of great scholars alongside with Malik, ibn Hanbal, AlShafii, and Abu Hanifa, but their students weren't as good as the others and they didn't spread it and evolve it, like Al Aozaai, Al Thawri and many others, the state never interfered with scholars' "ijtihadat" and "Fiqh" remained the source of legislation, doing the job of parliament until 19th century when the Ottoman empire changed that by bringing western laws and becoming "a modern state" causing the majority of Muslim ummah to be affected by modernity and what came after it, and causing the state to be collapsed a few decades after that. The difference between modern laws and "Fiqh" is that scholars used reasoning and have both evidence from Quran and Sunnah and rational reasons that have more benefits and less harm to people and environment, because Shari'a law is a moral law to begin with. While modern laws produced by politicians who're in the majority of them are liberals and secular only see the political interests regardless of the moral aspect of it, without any justification, the majority said so then we're going to do it.
Very important topic. I didnt know about aqeeda until i started watching salafi/ahle hadith videos, got a bit confused by what they said before i only knew basics and i think basic is enough for me. Hanafi in madhab and basic aqeeda from Quran and sunnah
Solid
Good enough. Ashari and Maturidi arose to face Mutazilites who are no longer there.
@@saracentiano they also mixed in some of there errors too but to a lesser degree. Sh. ebn Hanbal himself also refuted them.
Imam Ashari was raised mutazili and later followed ebn Kulab and then even later followed Imam Barbahari & students of Sh. ebn Hanbal!
When you see these different sects(not madhabs), then you will discover that it is the innovations that divided the ummah. The Mutaridi and Asharis are basically reformed Sufis/Mutazilas. Unfortunately, remnants of the beliefs they endeavoured to reform, remained with them. So you see Deobandis split into Mutaridi and Asharis. They are close but also have differences that cause big arguments between them. I would say, take the clearest route. The route of no innovations, the middle way, the route that do not need philosophical explanations but solely rely on authentic Hadith. I really believe the simple Muslim is better off than the the one who follow controversial matters. Please see surah 3 verse 7. Allah Almighty dues not expect us to know the answers to everything. People like some philosophers have gone astray by looking for unnecessary interpretations. Allah is All hearing, All seeing , Never sleeps . He SWT is not like his creation and he merely says Be and it Is. If Allah talks about His hand , His foot.etc. Rest assured it is not like your hand and foot. Allah says he is above His throne, He descends to the lowest heaven in the last part of the night then put a full stop to this sentence. It is matters of the unseen that is not going to benefit anybody for having opinions about it. Choose Sallaffiya. Not extreme Salafis . The creed of all the 4 imams were the same. They followed the Sunnah and the companions of the first 3 generations. May Allah SWT guide us. Islam is simple but the Thinkers and innovators complicated it.
@@muslim5067 i consider Ashari, maturidi, athari muslims all of there scholars did what they understood was right and Allah knows best
Amazing work brother Jan, May allah reward you
Alhamdulillah Jan, Dr. Shadee is the right person to guide you on Aqeedah. May Allah SWT bless and guide you forever.
Jazakallah khair, good content brother.
Excellent podcast purporting traditional islaam, JazakAllahu khayran. ❤
JazakaAllahu khayr
Maturidi is a name that is given to hanafis by there opponent, they used to call themselves "ahlus sunnat" or "ahlul haqq"
This is how hanafis describes themselves when they are dealing the aqeedah matters
But later on they start to be called maturidis because imam abul mansur almaturudi was the one, who defended hanafi aqeeda standpoints by reasons and debates
Aftersometime maturidies said, no problem, its doesn't matters if we are called maturidis and they accepted the name
If you want to learn hanafi aqidahs, then take the book "alaqeedah attahawyyiah"
Imam tahawi was a from the family of one of the greatest students of imam shafii
Imam tahayi has written in this book the aqeeda of abu hanifa, and his two greatest students abu usuf and muhammed and its very simple and easy
Already read this a while ago :)
Imam Abdul Wahab Rahimullah wrote excellent books on Tawheed etc. The ones who brand people Wahabis, did not read his books. Everything he wrote is backed up by Quran and authentic Hadith.
@@muslim5067no one says he didnt but he misinterprets them
@@halimvebic6578
Can you give an example my brother of a misinterpretation?
Hopefully with a reference!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 The Salafists has nothing to do with Dahawi Aqida, they're just using him because he is Salf, to be sure just google this : (where the Tahawi Aqida contradicts the Salaf) and look what the Salafists are saying about him
Bism Allah ma sha'allah brother may God bless you
Invite Alim Hasanagić (from Slovenia), maybe you have some things in common. Salams from Bosnia ❤
wonderful bro. Dr. Elmasry has knowledge and wisdom.
Beneficial content. Jazak Allah khair
A very good interview allōhûmma barik
everything is the same for me... the important thing is that we carry out everything based on the provisions outlined in the Qur'an and the Hadiths.There will always be differences... So Tabayyun knowledge is necessary, so that we can respect each other.
No.
Not Qur'an & Hadiths!
Islam has always been Qur'an & Sunnah.
Big difference.
جزاک اللہ خیرا
Ash’ari - I’m gonna deny certain things Allah says about himself and Affirm other things. The things I deny are things that seem like creation. But the things I affirm also can be applied to creation but I’m gonna pick and choose.
Athari - I’m gonna affirm everything Allah affirms about himself and just not think about it too much cause my human brain can’t grasp it.
ok
Dear Jan, Assalaam alaikum. This is a brilliant playlist/series idea that you are doing with Shaikh Yasir and Shaikh Shadee and others to come. Will you name this Basics of Islam 101 or introduction to Islam for reverts/everyone?
Not really since it creates big fitna 😢 I will continue studying on my own however
Oh well. May Allah subhana ta'ala put barakah in whatever you are doing. 😊
13:16 the ulama of ahlussunnah wal jamaah in the world do this (combining Ashari-Maturidi into one). This is easier for laymen who want to learn from scratch. If the want to go deeper, they'll know the difference once they are ready (at the certain level). That decrease the ignorants to speak what they don't know. That's the contrary in the salafi-wahabi movement.
Exactly. Much is common, the differences are a few. Those few are for the high level students.
@user-gc6wd7dm4w wahhabist with zero knowledge speaks loudest voice with anonymous account. Clearly coward
Much needed, so much fighting and unclear infos from opposing madhabs of these topics
JazakAllah'u khairan brothers
BarakAllahu Fīkum 🌹
Now this will be interesting
This was a great podcast
may Allah s.w.t make things easier for ur effort akhi.. aammiiiiiinn… btw the place i reside also consists of mixed race n background… may Allah unite us muslims all over the world… aammiiiiiinn..
Happy to know that you follow a madhab. It makes life simpler as a Muslim. All madhab follow the same aqidah: Asyairah Matrudiah.
Moga diberi kefahaman
That’s false . That’s extremely false . The 4 madahabs founders were all Atharis . What the hell are you saying 😂. They even made takfir on people who has similar beliefs 😂
@@youssefamr8073 The Wahhabi shares your view
@@MohdShahAbdullah there is no such things as Whabi. I can tell you grave worshipers share your opinion . Go look and see what each madhab said about Allah being above the throne . They all all affirmed this . Not only said they said there was ijmaa on it.
@@youssefamr8073 I know who is a Wahhabi just from reading their comments.
There are Ashaira imam who where confused by their own aqeeda. The legend of Ashaira was Imam Juwayni. He repented from his own aqeeda.
Atharee Imams. I never heared anyone on LEGEND level repenting from Atharee salafe aqeeda.
If this doesnt tell you something. You are basically lacking objectivity and basic born rationality.
One of approaches I use in judging aqeeda is evidence from their teachings, lies and did anyone repented from his own aqeeda. Its very un orthodox approach in judgement.
But this is the CLOSEST to objectivism.
Salam to you brother.
Call Muhammed Ali Aka The muslim Lantern on your podcast. He can be a great guest for you for questioning about Aqeeda
Mashallah Jan May Allah keep you steadfast in faith. 1 thing don't go deep into aqeedah and stuff..always keep in mind that your aqeedah is the aqeedah of ahlus sunnat wal jamaah (whatever that aqeedah is out there) and then pick a maddhab
Jazak allah to both of you. May allah preserve you both. Brother jan. I come from a bosnian muslim background. I think you may need to create a connection with muslims in bosnia. There are many similarities in the bosnian and Slovak language and culture. The bosnians generally follow the hanafi medhab. Selam.
Masha ALLAH Jan you should bring the Muslim Lantern to talk about the Athari view
Definitely
He is not an aqidah scholar. Better to bring someone who has done phDs in Ibn Taymmiyah and Aqidah. Like e.g. Shaikh Yasir Qadhi. Pure Hanabalite who is also anti-Wahhabi.
@@saracentiano - Yasir Qadhi who was a guy who doubted the preservation of Quran yet he was sopposedly a hafeth.
This guy who didn't know du'a to the qubur is shirk, Subahan Allah.
Quran 4 :82 if it was from other than Allah is would contradict! Learn Usul after Aqida & Manhaj!
That guy is a heretic @@saracentiano
Second lie :" the athari aqida is just hanabila who did not want to answer questions brought up by "satan" while the asharies where willing to take up the challenge" , what nonesense is this. (19:50 - 21:40 ).........Now responding to the second lie athari means : divine text first, quran and sunnah with the understanding of salaf el ummah (meaning the first three generations of muslims) as they where praised to be the best of all generations by the prophet himself in a authentic hadeeth. Okay so an ashari will also come and say i also stick to the quran and sunnah , well lets test this claim, asharis have to stick to the quran and sunnah ofcourse they cannot openly say they reject divine text when coming to aqida issues like what are the attributes of god for example, however they openly say and it's very popular amongst their books we put logic and philosophy first and then the divine text would be judged and understood by the logical and philosophical principles we put (by the way for someone who is well educated , will know that these philosophical and logical principles were originated by the greeks ) okay so whats the problem with that ? Why not make logic and philosophy be the judge to the divine text and make them also the determining factor of what the text should mean ?
well simply put the consequenses of doing so are horrific, these priciples lead them to deny the attributes of god and some of his actions which are clearly stated in the quran just because their minds can not comprehend the how of it ... by the way we are not asked to know the how of any of the atributes of god we are just obliged to belive in the meanings of the clear arabic words in the quran when it comes to the attributes of god specifically and everything else generaly , Asharis on the contrary they denied the divine attributes and did not affirm any of them except seven, because they could be proven rationally, or so they claimed. They denied Allah’s rising above the Throne (istiwaa’), His being exalted above His creation, and they said: He is neither within nor without the universe, neither above it nor below it… And there were other differences too. So how can we call them Ahl as-Sunnah?
Yes brother. This interview was like a sheep inviting a wolf to misguide and misinform his flock. Ash'ariyya creed has tons of holes and is easily debunked by someone with knowledge and sincerity.
I’m Saudi so I was raised as Salafi but in my 20’s I started to question my beliefs so I decided to not be attached to any Salafis ideas because it doesn’t encourage to ask logic questions about aqeedah and religion in general until I learned after 10 or more years that Islam is based on Quran and Sunnah and the best school that treated with by authentication and explanation them is the Athari school so I came back to become Salafi again not by inheritance only but by searching and learning
Did you study Ashari as well?
As salaamu alaykum brother Jan. Today's Asharis have a lot of Sufi innovations. They believe prophet Muhammad SAW can be present but we cannot see him. It is not very different from the mainstream Sufies that says prophet Muhammad SAW is indeed omnipresent. This is how they hang on to Sufi beliefs. I understand that Imam Ashari repented and adopted the Hanbali creed before he died.
Bro Jan keep exploring, Islam encourages rational thinking don't blind follow anyone
@@muslim5067He did not repent that is a common lie that is spread by some Salafis. Ibn Taymiyyah himself was also a sufi but I agree that some Sufis can have extreme beliefs that go against the Sharia
The Shiekh summed it up brilliantly, Ashari/Maturidi arose out of a need to explain important concepts.
Thanks
Very interesting podcast mashallah! ❤
Thanks Ben! ;)
Be careful guys. Yad means hand.
means? :) @@each1teach1
Hanbalis are often mis-labeled as hard liners, staunch literalists and traditionalists, because from among them are a few Wahabis and self proclaimed Salafis (who should not be confused with the first 3 generations of pious Muslim ancestors), especially considering that "the Salafi's" scholar of reference doesn't go back any further than Ibn Taymiyah. And Imam Hambal himself never attempted to give an interpretation for any of the descriptions and attributes of Allah (correct me if im wrong). Imam Malik, Imam Hanafi and Imam Shafi'ite were also of this opinion concerning the verses of Allah's attributes, because Allah cannot be encompassed, as is stated in the Quran. All of them were scholars who accepeted the verses as literal but refused to explain through rational means like metaphor as to what those attributes looked like, whether they contained depth and took up space, whether a body was in a direction and philosophical arguments such as these. Imam Hanbal never claimed these arguments and in fact fought against them. The other 3 madhabs in various degrees differed with Imam Hanifa's use of rational deduction (in fact Imam Hanifa's tools of human intellect were not widely popular at first) but today that madhab is considered the majority madhab subhanallah. Malikis were once upon a time a widely popular madhab and it enjoyed a little more acceptance and less scrutiny because it was seen as the school of thought of Medina. It is interesting when one does an indepth cursory study of how Islamic scholarship can take on many forms, depending on what the debate of the time is, for example, one can be Hambali and Ashari now, but at one time it would have been preferrable to be Hambali and Athari in creed because the rationalist Mu'tazilite philosophers were essentually the state-run enforcers of religious thought in Baghdad and they were brutal dictators. Rationalists by today's standards are Hanafis with a Tassawuf leaning and today its the Saudi state funded Hanbali-Salafis who are seen as too strict and not balanced in their approach. Imam Malik was himself seen as a traditionalist, so much so that he confined himself to the practices of the Sunna in Medina, a very traditionalist Athari in creed. Your favorite imam of whatever madhab all testify that Imam Malik's chain of narrations and teachers were the best (and in Imam Malik's time there were plenty of dialectic theologians then as well, and he studied under them for more than a decade, but despite that he did not accept the aqeeda of people like Ibn Humuz). But despite Imam Malik being against anthropomorphic beliefs of any kind, he did believe that Allah would be seen one day, as is described in Surah 75 Verses 22 and 23 and that Allah will only be veiled to the transgressors (Surah 83 verse 15).
Narrated 'Abdullah bin Mas'ud:that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "The best generation is my generation, then those who follow them, then those who follow them. Then comes a people after that whose swearing precedes their testimony, or whose testimony precedes their swearing
Hadith Sahih
the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) “Every Innovation is misguidance and every misguidance is in the (Hell)Fire.” [Saheeh Muslim,
It just a gift.(clothing) Not asking to change your culture. If changing name, it just if the old name having bad meaning. To be imam is to be a leader and to be imam at least you have ilmu-knowledge. New masjid normally learn from other masjid do and improvise some according to the culture.
And We made them a precedent and an example for the later peoples.
Alhamdulilah for Dr Shadee. We need knowledgeable shaykhs especially in these times.
For those wanting to criticize him: Youre not scholarly qualified to do so.
Youre not educated.
When the Shaykh speaks, you listen.
If you are not knowledgable, how are you able to know that he is knowledgable? Do you think a beard and glasses makes a person knowledgable?
@@SIGSEGV1337The "DOCTOR" title should tell you everything you need to know, but for some reason your brain aint computing.
This is exactly what the wahabis/salafis do, they see a man with a beard and a thobe and think hes a Shaykh without ever questioning his credentials.
Every major salafi I see online has no Islamic degree or Ijiziyah.
@@SIGSEGV1337YT keeps deleting my comments.
Look at his title, it says "Doctor". He has a Phd in Islamic studies and ijizya from multiple shaykhs from the Middle East.
You wahabis never ask your preachers what qualifications they have, as long as they have a beard and wear a thobe in your mind hes a shaykh.
This is wrong.
@@khairt1731 Ah well of course if he has a particular label bestowed upon him by the filthy status quo then he MUST BE trustworthy /s. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a salafi. We do not need garbage credentialism because our scholars tell us about the Qur'an and sunnah and we disagree with them freely.
@@SIGSEGV1337 whos "we"? And why are you as a layman disagreeing with SCHOLARS? This is ignorance at the highest level.
Youre not scholarly qualified to speak.
The only thing you can do is ask Questions to scholars.
You barely graduated high school.
JazakAllah Khair
Great episode brother
Why don’t you have a person knowledgeable in the Athari creed come on and discuss with him the Athari creed in detail
Wslm Alghamdulilah Good
Much needed thank you
Well done nice job
Jazakallahu Khair. Very informative video
Beware if you're in Australia in Australia they have lots off Qadyani...! Again , ask them about last prophet Muhammad [ PBUH ]
The question at 47:20 is the Salafi position confirmed reluctantly without being extreme in Kalam doctrines.
فَجَعَلۡنَٰهُمۡ سَلَفٗا وَمَثَلٗا لِّلۡأٓخِرِينَ
great discussion. Dr. Shadee Elmasry is one my go to scholar.
It was very useful for me being Muslim for 10 years
Just follow the history.
Things like Salafism are quite modern.
salafism revival might be modern but that doesn't make it modern, just a revival... duh!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543everything about it is modern, so a bit of historical reading.
Tawhid/ Sunni creed is balance.
Affirm Allah's Attributes as perfect (Quran 16 :60) to negate atheism.
Negate Likeness (Quran 42 :11) Also negates polytheism.
Quran 16 :60 ties Allah's Siffat with Akira when Allah is seen which Jahmiyah deny!
View time Line,
- Qadriya denied Allah has knowledge of future saying how can Allah allow evil, but story of Kidr shows things appear eviI at first as Allah is All Wise. Qadriya are called Majews of umma who believe in god of light & darkness who guides all eviI acts.
- Mutaziliah say Allah's Siffat are parts like the pagans in Quran 53 :19 tafsir which says Allah's name al Aziz was turned into the idol Uzza.
- Kulab Asharis confirm the Qadr but follow Qadriya & Mutazilah using foreign idea of Aristotle to say Allah's Siffat Qabr specifically are parts & isolating Allah's Attributes!
If we use foreign ideas of limited knowledge it wil only lead to division (Quran 4 :82) which is why when Ashari sofia bida increased in Uthmani empire it lead to secularism!
Salafism is part of modernism, while ashari and people who follow mazhab and sufis traditionalist
@@izharcohen4572
Yet prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him said I am the best salaf in Bukhari kitab of asking, I guess he is modern to you, which is clearly faIse btw.
Where is proof for such a claim?
Jazakallahu Khair
Aqeeda is a Salafi obsession. It's so simple
Aqida is 6 pillars of iman from hadith Jibril, it's basic Islam, how can one be obssessed with it?
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543bro that hand ( Yadh) question is not relevant to this worldly life, we believe in Allah, let’s not discuss this issue, bro
@@Khairuddin313 Asalam Aleik bro. Thanks, H/e it effects Iife & more importantly Akira (Quran 16.60). If ppl can make & reject ayat we will split & need unity so it's haram in Quran 3.103. Like Qadriya who deny Allah Knows the future saying how can Allah allow eviI, but like in story of Musa & Kidr we see things look eviI but Allah is all Wise too. Attributes define each other.
@@Khairuddin313 Salaf were Athari.
A. Quran 16.60 - Affirm Allah's Attributes as Perfect & true rejects atheism & ties to akira.
B. Quran 42.11 - Negate likeness to reject Polytheism - Tauhid balance.
C. Quran 7.33 - Leave what Allah has, don't affirm or negate. Tawil w/ Quran, sunna only.
Some Ashari see Allah's Attributes like Allah's Face as Tashbi & deny seeing Allah which is in Quran 75.22. This matches eviI in Quran 16.60 in denying akira. How can any of Allah's Attributes be tashbi when Allah is as al A.wwal or the 1st
This is important as this shows respect to Quran & sunna to follow it, & shows we can't contradict it & we all error but when we error fix it or we will divide.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543I take the stance of the hanbali Scholars on this Issue, We do not discuss this , because it is not relevant.
My brother Jan, I know how you feel. Perhaps the biggest challenge is that you may trust a sheikh or a scholar who may not be trustworthy. Therefore, I remember brother Sajid Libhan. He learned the Arabic language and Sharia law so that he would not have to rely on others to understand Islam, and the Arabic language is the key to Islamic sciences.
You should know that some sheikhs are trying to place big obstacles and holes so that you do not achieve the freedom of thinking to reach the absolute truth, but rather you remain dependent on them and fill your mind with what they want.
As a lover’s advice to you, you must learn Arabic first, as it is the key to Islamic sciences and access to the first sources in Islamic sciences so that you can compare what is right and wrong. For example, I can distinguish right from wrong even though I have not studied Islamic sciences because it is a simple equation and you can apply it if you doubt anything, which is The question is: What is your evidence from the text of the Qur’an and the Prophet’s hadith, or the four imams in jurisprudence, or the nine imams in hadith, or the ten imams of recitation in the Qur’an? If your sheikh does not extract evidence from these early scholars, stay away from him.
Because Islamic aleaqida is simply deduced from the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, and the first scholars who understood the religion from the companions of the Prophet Muhammad, may God’s prayers be upon them and their children. As for the later Muslim scholars, they are not a source for obtaining a new aleaqida or a new interpretation of the Qur’an. Therefore, many deviant sects appeared because of their distance from the understanding that was understood by the companions of the Prophet Muhammad and the early imams who were scholars of jurisprudence, hadith, and readings.
Therefore, if you do not want to argue or search for advanced books, ask any Jahmite, Mu’tazili, Shiite, Ash’ari, etc. What is the evidence for what you believe from the text of the Qur’an and the Hadith, the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad and the understanding of the companions of the Prophet Muhammad and the early Muslim scholars? If you find the answer directly, you are with a respected and trusted sheikh. If your sheikh maneuvers and engages you in long philosophical issues from later sheikhs, stay away from him.
Can you choose your belief without resorting to asking the sheikhs and without complications? The answer is yes.
This is necessary and without the correct aleaqida, how will you meet your Lord?
Because some people may be negligent in telling the truth, my brother, your belief must be correct in order to meet your Lord with sound belief and it will be a reason for entering Paradise.
Sheikh Abdul Mohsen Al-Qasim, the imam of the Prophet’s Mosque, says that a Muslim must learn the Book of Tawheed by Sheikh Muhammad Abdul Wahhab and the Book of the Wasitiyyah Doctrine in order for the Muslim to meet his Lord with a sound belief.
I will explain to you the importance of these books in aleaqida. After you read them, you can decide what is convincing to you based on the rule that we learned, which is the evidence from the Qur’an, the Sunnah, and the understanding of the first generation of Muslims.
1. Explanation of the Book of Tawhid by Ibn Uthaymeen. This book explains Islamic monotheism based on the texts of the Qur’an and Sunnah. Sufis and Shiites object to that book because they believe in the permissibility of requesting intercession from the dead (righteous saints) so that these dead may act as intercessors to the Creator for success, happiness, healing, paradise, etc.
Of course, Islamic monotheism is the direct worship of the Creator without an intermediary, whether it is an idol or a grave. Likewise, asking for Paradise from priests, as a form of forgiveness, contradicts Islamic monotheism in the eyes of the Salafists.
This book is necessary for you to read and have the mind and intelligence to know what is right and wrong because the methodology of right and wrong I mentioned to you.
You will see Sufis warning you not to read this book. Ignore them. It is not a book of magic. Most of it is Quranic texts and hadiths.
Then you will know whether it is more appropriate for you to follow the Salafis based on this book or to follow the Sufis and Shiites and what they believe in the righteous dead saints.
2. Explanation of the book The Wasitiyya Doctrine by Ibn Uthaymeen: The Salafists affirm the attributes of the Creator that were mentioned in the texts of the Qur’an and the Prophet’s hadiths, and they say that God is not a creation like Him, based on the understanding of the first generations of Muslims of the Qur’an, and we do not enter into philosophy about the attributes of the Creator because it is a matter of the unseen.
Therefore, if God says that He has a hand, we say that God said about Himself that He has a hand, etc.
The Ash’arites reject this and say that the speech is similes, etc.
The Salafis ask the Ash'aris: What is your evidence that it is an analogy?
They start cursing us because we reject the words of Muslim scholars, and they mean the later Ash'ari scholars!
For example, God has a throne in heaven based on the texts of the Qur’an. The Ash’aris say that God is everywhere, and this is an analogical text that we do not take textually, etc.
Although there is a number of evidence that God is in heaven from the Qur’an and the Prophet’s hadiths, the Ash’ari insist that God is everywhere.
We ask them: What is your evidence that God is everywhere? They say you anthropomorphize God? We want their evidence from the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad and his companions. They insult us and accuse us of things we did not say.
We encourage God to be everywhere because some places are impure or bad or it is not appropriate for the Creator to be present in them. These are things that we do not accept.
Rather, as Salafists, we understand the Qur’an with the understanding of the first generation of Muslims, and we do not enter into a philosophy regarding the attributes of the Creator, but rather we understand the text as it is and as the companions of the Prophet Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, understood it.
Therefore, my brother, the first book will explain to you the difference between the Sufis and the Salafists (Al-Athari) in the concept of polytheism or Islamic monotheism in the view of the Salafists, and the second book will explain to you the difference between the (Al-Athari) Salafists and the Ash’aris in the concept of the attributes of the Creator.
Do not allow anyone to try to belittle your intelligence or your ability to further seek knowledge from various sources.
The most important thing is to learn the Arabic language, and good luck to you.
Because there are some Westerners who have also embraced the Shiite doctrine, even though it is far from the correct teachings of Islam, and the reason is his ignorance of the Arabic language and blind trust in the Shiite sheikhs, as well as not reading from other sources to use his mind, and certainly the Shiite sheikhs will say do not read the books of Ibn Taymiyyah, the books of Muhammad Abd al-Wahhab, etc.. To be a puppet for the Shiite sheikhs.
Aleaqida’s books have been translated into English, and some are explained on TH-cam, so no one is trying to diminish your ability to absorb and understand books and then criticize or support them, because God gave you the mind to distinguish truth from falsehood based on the established standard, which are the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad and the understanding of Islam by his companions and their children because they are the ones who learned from the Prophet. Muhammad directly and from his companions.
These are some books on aleaqida:
1. The Creed of Al-wasitiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah
Sharah al Aqeda al Wasitiyah 2 Volume Set by Shykh Muhammad bin Salih Al Uthaimin
2. Explanation of a Summary of Al Aqeedatul Hamawiyyah: Authored by Ibn Taymiyyah
3. Towards Understanding of Tadmuriyyah by Shaykh-Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah
4. Explanation of the Book of Tawheed by Ibn Uthaymeen or Sheikh Al-Fawzan
5. Explanation of the Three Fundamental Principles of Islaam by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-Uthaymeen
6. An Explanation of the Four Rules Regarding Shirk of the Imaam and Mujaddid Muhammad Bin Abdil Wahhab by Luhaydaan Fawzaan
7. Explanation Of Important Lessons For Every Muslim by Shaykh-'Abdur-Razaq Al-Abad
A final issue, my brother. Concerning the differences in the alfiqa, they are issues of ijtihad, meaning the ruling may change with the increase of evidence to give preference to one ruling over another or for the benefit of the Muslims. The four imams, three of whom were students of each other.
Therefore, do not be fanatical towards these four imams, but rather be fanatical towards the strongest evidence.
For example, in Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia, if they study the Sharia books of the four imams, they may prefer the evidence of the Maliki, Hanafi, or Shafi’i over the ruling of Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal, even though they are Hanbalis, and the reason is the strength of the evidence.
But my question to you is that you can ask it to the Ash’aris. Was Imam al-Hanafi an Ash’ari and believed in the attributes of the Creator that the Ash’aris believe in or not?
So why do they disagree with the Hanafi imam in aleaqida, which is the most important and the reason for entering Paradise, and are fanatical about his jurisprudential doctrine, which he may make mistakes like the other three imams?
You need to stop spreading false information about Ashari aqueda. Salafi wahabi sect is misguided, you fall into that category. May Allah guide you!
My nation will not unite on misguidance, so if you see them differing, follow the great majority.’” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H3950, here.] “Abu Dhar (Allah be pleased with him) reported from the Prophet (Peace be upon him)that, "Two are better than one, and three better than two; so stick to the Jama'ah for verily Allah, Most Great and Glorious, will only unite my nation on guidance." [Ref: Musnad Ahmad, Kitab Al-Ansar, Abu Zar Al Ghafari, Hadith 20776
47:05 shadee referring to only mutawatir ahadith shows that his ashari position is against the sunnah and is very extreme and misguided. which scholar said to only take mutawatir ahadith?! only kuffaar "quran-only" people do, be aware.
the only extreme guy is you. Shame on you.
This is a type of Jihad. Constantly learning the religion and helping others.
😇💫💥💯😇
As Salam Aleikum wa Rahmatullah wa Barakathu Hayyakumallah I wanna recommend you brother a channel to learn your Deen properly Garden of ilm .
@5:21 What is the required mandatory minimum requirement to form a jamaat for jummah? Can't a Maliki pray in a majority Hanafi group?
3 people including the imam is what makes a jamaat, because in arabic plural three or more is in thr qur’an “ (62:9) O’ Believers, when the call for Prayer is made on Friday, hasten to the remembrance of Allah and give up all trading. That is better for you, if you only knew.” the word AAMANU is in a plural form of 3 or more, and God knows best
3 is for Hanafi. Maliki has different rules much more complicated.
Masha Allah
السلام علیکم جان صاحب اللہ تعالٰی آپ کو کامیاب بنانے آپ اچھا کام کر رہے ہیں
وہ مرد نہیں جو گھبرا جائے حالات کے خونی منظر سے
جس دور میں جینا مشکل ہو اس دور میں جینا لازم ہے
آپ شہر یا دیہات میں رہتے ہیں گوگل سے دیکھ لیں گے ضرور بتائیں
My nation will not unite on misguidance, so if you see them differing, follow the great majority.’” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H3950, here.] “Abu Dhar (Allah be pleased with him) reported from the Prophet (Peace be upon him)that, "Two are better than one, and three better than two; so stick to the Jama'ah for verily Allah, Most Great and Glorious, will only unite my nation on guidance." [Ref: Musnad Ahmad, Kitab Al-Ansar, Abu Zar Al Ghafari, Hadith 20776
For those who are worried ✨
There was never ashari maturidi or any other aqeedah except one in the time of the messenger ﷺ, we are ordered to follow the quraan and the authentic Sunnah with the understanding of the Companions. May ALLAH rectify our affairs and keep us firm upon the truth.
O you who believe! Obey ALLAH and obey the Messenger (Muhammad ﷺ), and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority. (And) if you differ in anything amongst yourselves, refer it to ALLAH and HIS Messenger ﷺ, if you believe in ALLAH and in the Last Day. That is better and more suitable for final determination.
Quran 4:49
SUBGANALAH YAAALLAH XCEPT AMEEN YAAALLAH ALGHAMDULILAH
Subhanallah
Maturidis also saying that yad is a attribute and saying it is power is absurd
Btw I was Maturidi before.
The Sahaba and Tabi'een gave the meaning of yad as the term hand in some ayat and the idioms of interpretation in others in Tafsir accordingly. This is Athar, not Kalam.
It starts with the wanting more religion, and it ends with wanting less religion.
Allah is one. Allah is goodness and everything good you ever lived or felt stems from Allah and goes back to Allah.
Love him and worship him that is the whole of the law. Stop thinking that people 1000 years figured it out. Nobody did. Islam is a simple message from a simple humble prophet. These charlatans will make Islam seem so complicated until God forbid you might leave it. I don’t want you to leave it. I’m a native Muslim from Morocco and the above is the whole religion the majority of muslims in Morocco believe in.
"starts with the wanting more religion, and it ends with wanting less religion.' -
this is what the batini sofia do, they do zhud in dunya ot shud in ilm and then fill in the vacum of knowledge by making up cuIt like fatwas not based on Quran and sunna, thus misguiding and dividing!
Sammakum al *muslimiina*
30:20 is beneficial for me.
This is what "my heart feels comfortable with" is a very very divisive concept. You end up with as many Divisions as there are people using this concept.
The better concept is to Follow The Evidence!
at the end of the day, you follow what your heart feels comfortable and the truth, you can not follow something that you are not comfortable with
@@saidctbb ....said the stubborn blind brainwashed Hindu, Christian, Athiest, Jew, Zoastrians etc ...let me be where i was born in a state of ignorance and let me not be enlightened by evidence LoL 🤣
No some people delve too much into Philosophy for example and overlay that into Islamic matters and find some concepts ‘uncomfortable.’ We have to be sincere to Allah and if we are uncomfortable we seek his help (with ibadat and specifically Istakhara) and seek the knowledgable scholars
Sura Zukhruf verse 56
People complicate everything. Islam is supposed to be simple and easy to follow but honestly its been made overly complicated.
depends on your intelligence.
As Wr Wb sorry but you gave the Asharis creed and you have to give also the Atharis concept on this isuues bc we have to be fair they also have a reason for their saying .."we have to believe on those verse in the qur'an like the salaf understand and believed "wout asking the howeness of Allah's attribute and without likeness bc Allah has no likeness"like Allah has hands but wout the likeness to the creation this is the creed of the salaf"
He is Laing to you hanbalis they are forming the sifat of allah all salafis make tanziih of allah and if you read the books of tge salaf before ibn taymiyay you will know that he follows the books of the slaf in the first century and socend centutry ,the ash'ary he makes repentance and wrote 3 books
Beware Off Qadyani , Always ask Qadyani WHAT do they say of last prophet Muhammad [ PBUH ]
salam Jan, who lied about Imam Abu Hanifa? give hints if you can't say.
I don't want to cause fitnah bro.....
understand. apologies.
Hanafi Ashari is safe brother. Falls into ahul sunnah.
Abu Dhar said, “I was with the Prophet (Sallal lahu aliwasalam) one day and I heard him saying: “There is something I fear for my Ummah more than the Dajjal.” It was then that I became afraid, so I said: “Oh Rasool Allah! Which thing is that?” He (SAW) said; “Misguided and astray scholars.”
(Reference:-Recorded in Musnad Imam Ahmad (no.20335, 21334 and no.21335). Sheikh Shu’ayb al Arna’ut graded it sahih li ghayri (authentic due to corroborating narrations) in his tahqiq of the Musnad (1999 ed., 35:21,296-97) Ziyad ibn Hudayr رضي الله عنه reported:- Umar ibn al-Khattab رضي الله عنه said to me, “Do you know what will demolish Islam?” I said, “No.” Umar رضي الله عنه said,
“Islam will be demolished by the faults of scholars, the arguments of hypocrites over the Book, and the judgment of misguided leaders.” [Sunan Al-Darimi, 220]
۩ Umar ibn al-Khattab رضي الله عنه reported:- The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, “Verily, among what I fear most for my nation is every hypocrite with a knowledgeable tongue.” In another narration, Umar رضي الله عنه said, “His tongue is knowledgeable, but his heart and deeds are ignorant.” [Musnad Ahmad]
۩ Thawban narrated that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said:- “I only fear for my Ummah from the misguiding A’immah.”
very ambiguous language bud and you could say this hadith is a lie
Yes the misguided wahabis and their slanderous tounges.
May Allah protect us from these hypocrites and bigots.
Notice how none of the salafi scholars dare not say a word against Saudi promoting music, intermixing of genders and Alcohol.
@@jj-yi1ne There more than one hadith, and these hadith were declared Sahih by Shaykh Arnaut. Here is an example in the quran in Surah Araf which Allah describes a scholar as a panting dog And relate to them ˹O Prophet˺ the story of the one to whom We gave Our signs, but he abandoned them, so Satan took hold of him, and he became a deviant.1
If We had willed, We would have elevated him with Our signs, but he clung to this life-following his evil desires. His example is that of a dog: if you chase it away, it pants, and if you leave it, it ˹still˺ pants. This is the example of the people who deny Our signs.1 So narrate ˹to them˺ stories ˹of the past˺, so perhaps they will reflect. What an evil example of those who denied Our signs! They ˹only˺ wronged their own souls.
So, indeed there are scholars who are indeed righteous but then their are scholars who follow their own desires and mislead others. The quran describes these type of scholars like a panting dog which is the worst type of dog. The traded the verses of Allah for a miserable gain how miserable which of that they have chosen. Just because they have been granted a lot of knowledge does not mean they cannot go astray, since shaytan also is knowledgable. Not to say there are indeed many scholars who in the past and present have been righteous but they are some who are astray and lead others astray. It has been said by some companions and tabieen that to beware of scholars who are close to the rulers for they most likely are afflicted by Fitnah.
@@jj-yi1ne seems like youtube deleted my reply lol
There are verses in the Quran which describes certain scholars that Allah would have elevated them but they clung to the earth and sold the verses of Allah for a small price. There are few sahabas and tabiens that say that the scholars who are close to the ruler have been exposed to fitnah, so it said to watch out for them. The more distant the scholar is from the ruler the more closer he is to Allah the more closer he is to the Ruler the further he is away from Allah
Correction: so don't get confused if Quran says ALLAH is closer to you than jugular vein at the same time lLIVES above HIS throne. Sorry for no editing before posting.
Where does Allah say He lives above His throne? I think you have misquoted the Qur'an.
@@carimaelfarrah7800 I think I misquoted. You might be right. "thumma istawa" doesn't mean "HE lives" but "thumma istawa alal Arshi" or "fawqal Arshi" both doesn't mean 'lives' but more close to ' while being on 'HIS Arsh' OR ON ' TOP OF HIS ARSH'. IN ANYWAY HE IS ALAKBAE, AL QADIR, ALSAMAD, ALAWAL WAL AKHIR. HE IS HAYULQAYUM, THERE IS NOTHING LIKE HIM, HE IS BEYOND WHAT WE CAN REACH WITH OUR PERCEPTION OR INTELLECT. HE KNOWS EVERYTHING AT ANYTIME, EVERYWHERE IN THE UNIVERSE, HE KNOWS THE FUTURE, PRESENT AND THE PAST. HE ENCOMPASSES EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING. NOTHING IS INDEPENDENT FROM HIM AND HE IS SOVEREIGN, EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING NEED HIN BUT HE NEEDS NO ONE AND NOTHING. NOTHING OF YOU IS INDEPENDENT OF HIM, EVEN THE SINGLE VREATH AND BEATS OF YOUR HEART, YOUR HEARING AND SIGHT. EVERYONE IS HIS AND EVERYTHING IS HIS AND EVERYWHERE IS HIS. YOU CANNOT GO OUT OF HIS REALM, YOU CAN'T JUMP FROM HIS DOMINION TO ANOTHER DOMINION. WHY PEOPLE ARGUE ABOUT SUCH THINGS IS BEYOND ME. ALL ESSENCE IS WITH HIM, ALL FUNCTIONS ARE FROM HIM. WE HAVE BEEN GIVEN A LITTLE ONLY.
@@hiraabnews4578 thank you for correcting and clarifying. An important point of aqeeda to understand as expressed by Imam Tahawi is, " The Arsh and the kursi are both real. Yet Allah has no need of the arsh and whatever is beneath it." AND, "He is transcendent beyond limits, ends, supports, components, or instruments. The six directions do not contain Him as they do created things."
@@carimaelfarrah7800 subxanaALLAH. Great take-on brother
@@carimaelfarrah7800 I seems to me that all aqida are correct and there are no fundamental differences but artificial due to limited human intellect and due diligence.