I have a 6600 XT and the 5600X, I´ve been having a problem that the games takes too long to load after a death or something, have you gotten that problem too?
Is this game poorly optimized too? You know, they said 5700XT for Starfield was going to be underperforming and I played that at 1440p mostly high settings just fine consistently over 50 frames - up to 80 in the lesser demanding areas WHILE SF was poorly optimized. I didn't notice any performance issues. It seems like you could do that here 1440p, FSR enabled, high-medium settings. I say medium because there were definitely some graphical settings which did nothing but suck away frame rates and Gamer Nexus went through all of that.
some of the settings have only small to no impact on the visuals... so just look up for optimised settings.. its like in rdr2... u could, but u mostelikely wont profit of higher settings.
Its a no brainer buying this game for me if i can get 60 fps with Frame Gen . I have a 3600x not a 5600x tho, you think i will be still getting 60 fps on ultra settings ?
Ryzen 7 3700x, rx 5700, 32 gb 3800, gpu,cpu stock, ultra 1080p- 30-35 fps, low 45-50 fps, but the input lag is brutal, like 30 FPS, the game is not finished
same exact setup, i feel like my setup is so bad compared to all the other comparisons ive seen, i spent over 1k usd on this setup about 4 years ago and it can barely even run a new game lol
wow, that is a lot of performance u got there with that setup... i'm shocked is this because of the fsr? for real, that is a cheap setup and could be an excellent option for poor latinamerica xD
4k,1440p,1080p FSR+Frame Generation
th-cam.com/video/VJY4fk5f2lg/w-d-xo.html
That's my setup. I am slowly building my new PC for this generation and play the PS4 era at 4K Max.
Glad to hear that bro.
@testingrx5700xt Thank you for your channel, let me sub as well.
@@takehirolol5962 appreciate that.
It seems high fsr - 78 fps and high fsr with FG - 43 fps are swapped, isn't it?
Yeah it was a mistake, i corrected the timestamp from the description, appreciate for pointing that out bro.
RIp 5700xt. you had a really good run
hoping it can still kick with the upcoming games and appreciate stopping by on my channel.
How is the picture quality with FSR (quality) but FG off?
Just a bit the same for me since thee resolution is already scaled down at 66% then just enabling FG to boost up the FPS.
Did you use a capture card for this? or are you able to squeeze out more FPS when not recording? btw what model of 5700XT do you have?
Using AMD recorder, no recorder it can gain 3-5 FPS and I’m using Powercolor RedDragon RX5700XT.
seems like I'll be trying out STALKER 2 for myself, thank you for the reply!
I have a 6600 XT and the 5600X, I´ve been having a problem that the games takes too long to load after a death or something, have you gotten that problem too?
So far no, and you installed this in SSD right?
@testingrx5700xt off course! I don't know why it happens
@@DestroyIhosh that is unusual, hopefully, they will fix it in the next patch/update they will going to release.
Is this game poorly optimized too? You know, they said 5700XT for Starfield was going to be underperforming and I played that at 1440p mostly high settings just fine consistently over 50 frames - up to 80 in the lesser demanding areas WHILE SF was poorly optimized. I didn't notice any performance issues. It seems like you could do that here 1440p, FSR enabled, high-medium settings. I say medium because there were definitely some graphical settings which did nothing but suck away frame rates and Gamer Nexus went through all of that.
Its a demanding game.
What’s the drawback of frame generation?
The stutter but not that much.
some of the settings have only small to no impact on the visuals... so just look up for optimised settings.. its like in rdr2... u could, but u mostelikely wont profit of higher settings.
is it Sapphire - MSI - ASUS or XFX ????
Powercolor Reddragon
@@testingrx5700xt WoW !! the monster one !!! Epic Graphic Card ..... very underrated
Its a no brainer buying this game for me if i can get 60 fps with Frame Gen . I have a 3600x not a 5600x tho, you think i will be still getting 60 fps on ultra settings ?
for 1080p I think youll be fine.
how does frame gen feel? laggy?
For me enabling frame gen is a much better option.
Could you test this on 1440p ?
Hey man, just done doing test for 1440p and 4k if you are interested check out my video, thanks
seems like my rx 5700xt good career ended xD For me anything below avg 50 fps is unplayable, time to upgrade for atleast 4070
Might wanna wait for the 5000 series GPU of NVIDIA or AMD 8000 GPU.
@@testingrx5700xt oh i forgot there were leaks about rtx 5090, true so more likely rtx 5070 xD
Ryzen 7 3700x, rx 5700, 32 gb 3800, gpu,cpu stock, ultra 1080p- 30-35 fps, low 45-50 fps, but the input lag is brutal, like 30 FPS, the game is not finished
If you gonna play the game, might wanna consider FSR and Frame Generation.
same exact setup, i feel like my setup is so bad compared to all the other comparisons ive seen, i spent over 1k usd on this setup about 4 years ago and it can barely even run a new game lol
@@Pooky_x how is the Marvel Rivals on your PC brother?
wow, that is a lot of performance u got there with that setup... i'm shocked
is this because of the fsr?
for real, that is a cheap setup and could be an excellent option for poor latinamerica xD
This GPU can still handle well most of the new games especially having FSR and Frame Generation.
Your 5700xt is using more power than mine, wtf
How much power draw is your RX5700XT.?
its another model probably, mine is a sapphire nitro+ and can go to 265w
@@testingrx5700xt usually remains between 115w to 120w
The maximum I reached was 149w
@@KFSENSEI I don't go near this
lmao this game looks like a game from 2012, and run like 💩 even with a rtx 4070
still much better than Cyberpunk on its release