I don't understand... The game struggling with decent performance on a RTX 4090, but on low-medium, even a RX 5700 can hold a decent performance on medium... Sadly, this cult classic franchise won the worst optimised game award this year...
This is why the RX 5700 and RX 5700XT is one of my favorite budget GPUs I recommend. It's still going strong! RX580 on Amazon can be $80-100 or an aftermarket RX 5700 for maybe $140-170. Definitely worth the extra funds considering the RX 580 is struggling with many titles people enjoy. I've even seen the RX 5600XT for just a bit more than the slower performing RX 580, so I don't recommend the RX 580 in 2024+. Just not worth it anymore unless you get it for cheap. It doesn't help that some games are just not optimized very well, so a GPU capable of bringing you playable FPS with FG enabled is often needed.
A man compared the 500th generation With the maximum 5000 XD, and forgot about the fact that there is a whole generation between them, it's the same as comparing 1050ti vs 2060 man, if you take the 5700 xt as an example to your opponent, then take its predecessor, at least the RX vega 64
@csgobatxold141 I'm merely comparing price per performance. For a while the RX 580 would be great, but lately I can get the RX 5700 for cheap enough that it no longer makes sense unless the RX 580 drops in price. When I'm seeing the RX 580 for $80-100+ I can't recommend that over a RX 5700 that I just saw yesterday for $130. Plus look at the performance/power efficiency you're getting per price and you'll see why I would be lying if I said the RX 580 is worth it on the level of a RX 5700 Price/Performance ratio wise. Maybe if the RX 5700 was going for $200, then it would make sense to recommend the RX 580 to somebody who doesn't want to spend that much on a GPU. Hopefully that makes sense.
I bought one in 2020; this thing ran Starfield 1440p on med-high settings perfectly fine despite how poorly its optimization was at release. It's got life in it still. Especially when this game gets patched for further optimization (I assume this will be a thing).
@synergygaming604 That is absolutely incredible and I believe it. Definitely one of their GPUs that to me is a legacy. Especially with how well the drivers have matured. They literally made it a good budget GPU even in 2024. The only one I didn't like much was the 5500. I had a 5500XT and gave it away to a friend lol. It might be decent now but I just didn't like it as much as the 5600 5700 etc. I thought the specs were a bit too cut down and I remember it stuttering even with my Ryzen 3600 and x570 Asus mobo and 32gb g.skill DDR4.
Hi man thanks for the video it's very interesting... I would like to take advantage of your PC configuration cause it's not common to see 2 gpus and this unlock one possibility that I don't see tested... You could run the game with your rx 5700 xt and run the afmf2 with your rx 7600 xt in this way you could literally double your framerate... I see you tested the fsr3 but in that case you have a drawback in the number of rendered fps (usually around 80%-90%)... But if you use the rx 7600 xt as output video and the rx 5700 xt as rendering gpu with the activation of the afmf2 all the frames rendered by the rx 5700xt will be interpolated and you'll double your framerate with no drawback... I know that for many it's not interesting but when you want to squeeze all the fps from your hardware configuration this could be a good trick... Thanks again i appreciated the video
Is this game poorly optimized too? You know, they said 5700XT for Starfield was going to be underperforming and I played that at 1440p mostly high settings just fine consistently over 50 frames - up to 80 in the lesser demanding areas WHILE SF was poorly optimized. I didn't notice any performance issues. It seems like you could do that here 1440p, FSR enabled, high-medium settings. I say medium because there were definitely some graphical settings which did nothing but suck away frame rates and Gamer Nexus went through all of that.
RX7600 vs RX6650XT ?? This might be useful to someone, and honestly, test in cs2 with everything on high and fire, everything has to be on low, it's a competitive game!!
I wonder how it will run on RX 6650XT, maybe game will be playable but I am worry about CPU R5 3600 and "only" 16Gb of RAM :D I am giving the rest for my 2k monitor for this game and willing to swap to 1080p second 10y old display with ugly colors :(
More S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 Test:
RX 6650 XT - th-cam.com/video/bhKSJQsqh8Q/w-d-xo.html
Arc A750 - th-cam.com/video/4qSZ_C1WqsA/w-d-xo.html
RTX 2080 - th-cam.com/video/BHvjLmsf6SI/w-d-xo.html
RTX 2060 6GB - th-cam.com/video/2-hSVgXjuoc/w-d-xo.html
RX 580 - th-cam.com/video/ZSqy2oGc3ww/w-d-xo.html
GTX 1080 Ti - th-cam.com/video/DM9XGZwKFx4/w-d-xo.html
Timestamps:
00:00 - 1080p Native, Low
01:07 - 1080p Native, Medium
02:11 - 1080p FSR 3.1 Quality, Medium
03:21 - 1080p Native, High
04:26 - 1080p FSR 3.1 Quality, High
05:07 - 1080p FSR 3.1: Q + FG, High
07:13 - 1080p Native, Epic
06:57 - 1080p FSR 3.1 Quality, Epic
09:05 - 1080p FSR 3.1: Q + FG, Epic
Gaming PC Specifications:
► CPU : AMD Ryzen 5 7600X amzn.to/3RAlT9P
► Motherboard : MSI PRO X670-P WIFI amzn.to/4bb5Tlx
► RAM : 32GB (2*16GB) DDR5 6400MHz CL32 amzn.to/3VAZ6fn
► CPU Cooler : MSI MEG Coreliquid S360 CPU Liquid Cooler amzn.to/3VAzKOn
► PSU : CORSAIR RM1000X - 1000 Watt PSU amzn.to/3RE9sK5
► GAMING SSD : WD BLUE SN570 2TB amzn.to/3VwgD8d
► Recorder : Corsair Elgato HD60 X amzn.to/4c6BZjC
► OS : Windows 11 Pro (x64) Build 24H2
► GPU 1 : ASUS RX 5700 XT TUF GAMING OC
► Drivers : AMD Adrenaline 24.10.1 Drivers
I don't understand... The game struggling with decent performance on a RTX 4090, but on low-medium, even a RX 5700 can hold a decent performance on medium... Sadly, this cult classic franchise won the worst optimised game award this year...
This is why the RX 5700 and RX 5700XT is one of my favorite budget GPUs I recommend. It's still going strong! RX580 on Amazon can be $80-100 or an aftermarket RX 5700 for maybe $140-170. Definitely worth the extra funds considering the RX 580 is struggling with many titles people enjoy. I've even seen the RX 5600XT for just a bit more than the slower performing RX 580, so I don't recommend the RX 580 in 2024+. Just not worth it anymore unless you get it for cheap. It doesn't help that some games are just not optimized very well, so a GPU capable of bringing you playable FPS with FG enabled is often needed.
A man compared the 500th generation With the maximum 5000 XD, and forgot about the fact that there is a whole generation between them, it's the same as comparing 1050ti vs 2060 man, if you take the 5700 xt as an example to your opponent, then take its predecessor, at least the RX vega 64
@csgobatxold141 I'm merely comparing price per performance. For a while the RX 580 would be great, but lately I can get the RX 5700 for cheap enough that it no longer makes sense unless the RX 580 drops in price. When I'm seeing the RX 580 for $80-100+ I can't recommend that over a RX 5700 that I just saw yesterday for $130. Plus look at the performance/power efficiency you're getting per price and you'll see why I would be lying if I said the RX 580 is worth it on the level of a RX 5700 Price/Performance ratio wise. Maybe if the RX 5700 was going for $200, then it would make sense to recommend the RX 580 to somebody who doesn't want to spend that much on a GPU. Hopefully that makes sense.
I bought one in 2020; this thing ran Starfield 1440p on med-high settings perfectly fine despite how poorly its optimization was at release. It's got life in it still. Especially when this game gets patched for further optimization (I assume this will be a thing).
@synergygaming604 That is absolutely incredible and I believe it. Definitely one of their GPUs that to me is a legacy. Especially with how well the drivers have matured. They literally made it a good budget GPU even in 2024. The only one I didn't like much was the 5500. I had a 5500XT and gave it away to a friend lol. It might be decent now but I just didn't like it as much as the 5600 5700 etc. I thought the specs were a bit too cut down and I remember it stuttering even with my Ryzen 3600 and x570 Asus mobo and 32gb g.skill DDR4.
Wow, the 5700XT is still alive!
Hi man thanks for the video it's very interesting... I would like to take advantage of your PC configuration cause it's not common to see 2 gpus and this unlock one possibility that I don't see tested... You could run the game with your rx 5700 xt and run the afmf2 with your rx 7600 xt in this way you could literally double your framerate... I see you tested the fsr3 but in that case you have a drawback in the number of rendered fps (usually around 80%-90%)... But if you use the rx 7600 xt as output video and the rx 5700 xt as rendering gpu with the activation of the afmf2 all the frames rendered by the rx 5700xt will be interpolated and you'll double your framerate with no drawback... I know that for many it's not interesting but when you want to squeeze all the fps from your hardware configuration this could be a good trick... Thanks again i appreciated the video
Sharpnes must be on 100%
Is this game poorly optimized too? You know, they said 5700XT for Starfield was going to be underperforming and I played that at 1440p mostly high settings just fine consistently over 50 frames - up to 80 in the lesser demanding areas WHILE SF was poorly optimized. I didn't notice any performance issues. It seems like you could do that here 1440p, FSR enabled, high-medium settings. I say medium because there were definitely some graphical settings which did nothing but suck away frame rates and Gamer Nexus went through all of that.
RX7600 vs RX6650XT ?? This might be useful to someone, and honestly, test in cs2 with everything on high and fire, everything has to be on low, it's a competitive game!!
You most likely get similar fps with low settings.
@@NJTechBenchmark It really is, but no one is going to play competitive games at the top, right?
Like I said if CPU is bottlenecking then you can pick any of these two. Rx 7600 is slower than 6650 xt if play in high/ultra settings.
Did you like the game in general?
Yes I like the game.
Medium isn't much more intense than low settings.
cant tell if its better to play it on native High or on Epic but with FSR+FG (im talking about better looking)
For 8gb vram use med to high settings, native upscale.
I wonder how it will run on RX 6650XT, maybe game will be playable but I am worry about CPU R5 3600 and "only" 16Gb of RAM :D I am giving the rest for my 2k monitor for this game and willing to swap to 1080p second 10y old display with ugly colors :(
16 гб мало. 22 гб всегда загружено
Does FG or fsr reduced image quality
Yes if you using below native quality.
It adds input lag
@@NJTechBenchmark and what about Dlss
@Catness-c6I you're not going to notice much with dlss.
only fsr, fg doesnt but will give you input lag, dont worry since when you play single player games you may dont care about it much