Cardfight!! Vanguard Angel Feather (Gavrail) | Premium Deck Profile March 2024
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มี.ค. 2024
- Gavrail Premium Deck Profile March 2024
Outro music was transcribed and remixed for entertainment purposes. All original music belongs to Bushiroad Inc. - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
![Ep.2 เบสไวน์ รวมคลิปฮา SS4 - [ พากย์นรก ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ihk-LzEbox0/mqdefault.jpg)
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.79[1/2] แก๊งไทบ้านพาบุกเมืองบั้งไฟโก้ ยโสธรรรร!!!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ldr3_fvTEXk/mqdefault.jpg)
Awesome build! I'm glad Gav has more options these days. A note about Nociel and the QS though: she can definitely put it (and by extension the Guardian Shield) to damage. I hate to say a support email is wrong but, while 15.5.1 of the comprehensive rules does say that ticket cards have only grade, type, and text information, 15.5.5 also says they follow the rulings for Orders. 2.2.5, in the, "Clan", section of the rules, says Orders with no clan or nation belong to all clans and nations--hence the reminder text. I understand the email is saying that, "belong to", is simply a reminder they can be used but, that doesn't make any sense! "Belong", is the wording that denotes things having clan/nation information all throughout the comprehensive rules.
Thank you! We're honestly considering doing more deck profiles with different builds for Angel Feather because we know everyone loves this clan.
I totally understand the confusion with the G Nociel ruling. It was even confusing for us and is often debated about here, but most of us are inclined to believe what the support says, despite it being a bit contradictory to the comprehensive rules. We emailed them on several different occasions in the past, but they all returned with the same answer.
Trust me, I would love for Nociel to swap pseudo-cards, but that also seems like it can be a bit much if that interaction was allowed, maybe.
@@casualzonecfv Ah fair enough, it is contradictory with the rules which is what's so weird. I've never emailed them myself but, have discussed this with a judge. Personally I don't think it'd be too much but, maybe I'm biased lol. They should probably do an update to the nomenclature in the rules... at least we have something definitive like Zabaniya!
Yep, there's a lot of mixed opinions on it, which is why we figured to throw it out there for people to see. If you happen to email them yourselves on the matter, do let us know what their responses are. If we have differing answers, now there is definitely something wrong! I also don't think this interaction would be too much (for now), but perhaps it's a way for them to futureproof it from potentially breaking. Kind of like how all the V Angel Feather cards specify "unit cards" instead of "cards".
Speaking of Zabaniya, there was also a change to her after she was reprinted from History Collection that nerfs some of her usage. We should have shown a comparison on screen, but we made sure to ask support which text is correct, and they responded by saying that the reprint is the correct one. So definitely, I agree! There really should be some sort of update somewhere that's more easily found lol.
You have a great voice! Would love to hear you do other commentary style videos
Thank you! Makes us feel a bit better about how strange sounding we are on camera.
Interesting suggestion. May I ask what kind of commentary style videos you are referring to? Like voice overs in match videos and things of that sort?
Personally, I would benefit from a voice over in some of your matches! I listen to a lot of content on the go / driving. Nexus corps does a great job explaining what's happening without needing to look at the screen. Having this type of content would allow me to watch you guys on the go too! Currently, I watch a lot of your deck profiles on the go for fun
That actually sounds surprisingly fun to do! Getting player insights and perspectives on the match would be a pretty neat idea so maybe we can try it just to gauge interest in that style of video. Although we can't promise anything since timing would no doubt be an issue and we already don't post enough as it is. But we will definitely consider your suggestion because it sounds very compelling.
As always though, thank you for sticking with us!
Definitely interesting deck list.
Omg yay!! Was looking forward to this
Really fun build when it works god it works lol
Yeah, definitely! Despite it being one of the weaker clans, it can still perform and actually does surprisingly well against some better decks.
It surprises people for sure lol
Thanks for the awesome deck profile! Just started playing this clan because angel waifus 😊but the deck is sure fun as heck. Do you think angel gyze is better?
You're very welcome!
It's a toss up as to whether Angel Feather Gyze is better or not, although it is widely agreed that Gyze would edge over regular AF variants. As with all decks, pure AF and Gyze have their pros and cons, and a lot of it is dependent on matchups. If the matchups aren't terrible, they are both viable in these regards. However, Gyze is also more popular with its very simplistic playstyle and fairly easy win-con since it does produce more results. Gavrail, on the other hand, is nearly the exact opposite of that. Non-Gyze variants have difficulty closing out games, and that is really what AF lacks in general.
@@casualzonecfv That all makes a lot of sense to me. I really pray that pure angels will get more support down the line then. Also I know that it has already been asked for in the comments here and I do not mean to be annoying but may we also see an angel gyze list from you guys as well? It is okay if you don't or can't really!! Thank you anyway and keep up the great work!
Not annoying at all! We enjoy interacting with you guys.
Also sure why not, Angel Feather Gyze deck profile inbound. Look forward to it!
@@casualzonecfv Omg wow, thank you!!! Really appreciate you guys for listening to comments all the time and take your time too! ♥
Would running 1 Evangel Seraph, Raphael Mitra in the G zone be worth it just in case you would need that extra healing?
Both iterations of Raphael will find more usage in Gyze variants. For non-Gyze, striding into Raphael is usually never the better play because all she really does is stall and doesn't exactly advance the game state. It's often better that we try to push every turn instead to deplete the opponent's resources. They do have their uses but is _extremely_ niche to the point that they're almost wasted slots, which is why we excluded them in the current list and kept more practical strides and also filled it out with more utility in G-Guardians.
Yea that makes sense. Angel feather gyze deck profile next maybe? :)@@casualzonecfv
We feel most Angel Feather Gyze lists are quite standard at this point but if that is what people wants next, then sure! As always, we'll gauge interests first before making that decision.
can you so the OTT ametarsu battle sister deck profile??
We have other deck profiles lined up for the moment, so we will consider it after tinkering with the deck more first.
You dont play the ride fixers?
We'll just copy and paste the response we gave to another viewer on the same question.
The ride fixer for Angel Feather isn't as amazing as some of the others. There's no card that we absolutely want to ride into or search for as a lot of the cards we play already accomplishes what she does but better and more efficiently to add cards from damage to hand. Also, her skill has an additional cost of a pseudo-counterblast which can make her somewhat clunky to use. Not a bad tech option though and can potentially see more value elsewhere but for this build, we really don't need her since she doesn't bring much else.
No V PR?
The ride fixer for Angel Feather isn't as amazing as some of the others. There's no card that we absolutely want to ride into or search for as a lot of the cards we play already accomplishes what she does but better and more efficiently to add cards from damage to hand. Also, her skill has an additional cost of a pseudo-counterblast which can make her somewhat clunky to use. Not a bad tech option though and can potentially see more value elsewhere but for this build, we really don't need her since she doesn't bring much else.
Hamiel was banned,What card should put in the deck
Hamiel is only banned in the V-Premium format but this is for Premium. She is safe here and won't be touched since there are many outs to her in this format.
I'm curious. How well does it play with less draw perfect guards? Local wise?
Having none is perfectly fine and really doesn't change it all that much. Since this is a crit build, we want to maximize on crits anyways and we already have multiple ways to guarantee PGs without having to sacrifice too much room for them. Local-wise, it'll all depend on what you're mostly up against and you'll need to adjust your own ratios based on that since everybody's local meta differs. Although, it's best to have at least some main deck PGs like grade 1 PGs as a replacement for safety, specific matchups, random guard restricts, etc.