"Renowned Professor Debunks Evolution: Unveiling the Truth!" with Professor Major Coleman
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 มิ.ย. 2024
- Subscribe for more content!! This video is an exciting discussion with Major Coleman. Clips of this famous interview have gone viral all over Facebook and instagram.
Professor Coleman elegantly dismantles the theory of evolution, give a realistic perspective on Noah and the flood, and shares why you can trust the Word of God. This is a powerful interview!
****Hey everyone! Did you know you can now support our channel directly through Super Thanks? Just click the heart icon with the dollar sign below the video to send us a tip and get your comment highlighted!
#God #Hope #Today #Wow #Checkthisout #1min #Inspirational #Jesus #Heaven #Apologetics #sermon #scripture #instagram #christian #Comfort #Positive #Today #Christianity #Law #teachers #academia #evolutiondebunked #Evolution #mustwatch #classroom #praise #praisesongs #evolutionchallenge #creationism #genesis #creation
(Anil Kanda interviews Major Coleman) - บันเทิง
It’s very unfortunate that those who disagree with what Major Coleman said seem to belittle or degrade him rather than submit counterpoints. It does not make someone less intelligent for submitting a different viewpoint from you, if your viewpoint is as superior as you claim, it should be nearly effortless to convince them to your “truth”. It doesn’t cost anything from us to be kind to one another and we need it most when we disagree.
He thinks cats and dogs should be able to breed if evolution was true (it would falsify evolution). He thinks abiogenesis is part of the theory of evolution. He basically understands nothing, and is just arguing against a strawman. Incompetence or malice is of course hard to judge. Probably he is more willfully ignorant.
I am not saying he has to accept evolution for me to respect his opinion on it. But he has to understand it. He does not. And we are not talking "he got a few details wrong". No, we are in the 2+2=5 level of ignorance here.
@@lmoelleb abiogenesis has historically been part of the theory of evolution.
Evolutionary theory is an attempt to explain the origin of species through natural means without supernatural Creation. Logically, unless you concede the existence of God and subscribe to theistic evolution in order to explain the origin of life (a position that has been shown to be unsustainable), abiogenesis must have originally occurred in order to commence the process of Darwinian evolution. Abiogenesis is required by evolution as the starting point.
The growing trend among evolutionists today to attempt to sidestep the problem of abiogenesis by contending that evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life, but rather is a theory which starts with life already in existence and explains the origin of all species from that original life form is either intellectually dishonest, agenda driven or just brainwashed indoctrination.
@@lmoellebexplain a single point where he was wrong?
@@lmoellebhe quite literally described what evolution and macroevolution is 😂😂😂😂 and how illogical it is.
@@lmoellebhow can you not link Abiogenesis to evolution when evolution relies on creation being non-life to life doofus…?
I grew up Catholic and was taught to only have “blind faith” and not question any of the Church’s doctrines. When I went to university I was quickly indoctrinated into Secular Humanism. I took so many philosophy of religion courses that I had an unofficial minor in it! (Of course, not one single class was taught by anyone of faith - all were taught by Atheists.)
It wasn’t until almost 2 decades later when I was 37 years old that I was actually exposed to Apologetics. That is, the evidence for belief in God. But even more succinctly, the truth that Yahweh, the one true God and Creator of the universe loved His creation (humanity) so much that he humiliated Himself by becoming one of us. This was foretold in multiple scriptural prophecies.
He lived with us, He loved us, He taught us the true meaning of the Torah, Tanakh, and other scriptures and most importantly… He died in the most humiliating and tortured way while taking the sins of the world upon Him. After this, He was resurrected and defeated death itself for any and every person who chooses to accept this gift of salvation. I truly believe that anyone who honestly seeks truth will find it in the One who is Truth.
Jesus did not die for your sins and was treated the same as any other criminal of his day
Excellent
@@captaingaza2389Citation?
Hi Lisa, your story can be true. But to say being a Catholic is to follow the truth of the faith blindly can't be true. May be you were young at that time when you were told just to have faith in God. However, Catholicism is the most developed and highly sophisticated form of Christianity because it's of Christ. It can't be anything else. Right before Luther came, Catholicism was 1500 years old. And that means the Church has examined and thought about the truth for 1500 years. Indeed, betrayal and corruption, just like Judas, was and still is part of Church. As unacceptable as it is, it doesn't change the fact that Catholicism, with it's younger sister Church in Orthodox, is the only faith that is of Christ and Christ of God.
@@captaingaza2389Jesus died for all mankind, and He is God.
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, and against the worldly gouernours, the princes of the darkenesse of this worlde, against spirituall wickednesses, which are in ye hie places.” Ephesians 6:12 Geneva Bible version
He was absolutely correct about having a duty stand against evils.
So biological and geological science is an evil to you?
Just as hard to wrestle against ignorance and willful ignorance at that.
☦❤🕊
Facts
@@riccardopellegrini1698 some people are extremely foolish. They usually do not know who they are, and most of the time they think they're wise. 🤷🏼♂️
I'm so honored to see my professor on screen. Truly humbled. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
I wish I pursued your wisdom knowledge and understanding before graduating. God bless you, Professor Coleman.
Your professor is a moron
You should be embarrassed by his scientific ignorance....
@user-xp4fm2st8u then why don't you go up and debate with your evidence? Instead of trolling comments, show what you got. At least he chose to risk his name and rep... don't hide behind a screen and a random user name. Go up and debate it if you're so well versed.
@@snollennubecause literally every point Coleman or any creationist has brought up has been debunked a billion times over. Why don't you get out of an echo chamber and try to demonstrate your beliefs & claims.
@cwillis92 Oh wow, it looks like someone is big-mad. Can't argue with you. 🤣🤣🤣 Well, you know that Professor Coleman has reward money for anyone who was willing to debate him on his research and prove him wrong. You should go show your "billions of times" research, surely you could win the money. You surely got more credentials than the university professors who disagree but never showed. Go on now, let's see whose behind the screen debunking scholars...
For the record when a person inflates the reality of their claims like "billions," "every," and "echo chamber," its usually due to them not being confident in their own statement and needing to exaggerate it to make it appear greater than it is to make it sound credible or strong. Hopefully that helps... 🤷🏿♂️🤷🏿♂️🤷🏿♂️
"A war of ideas" So true. I grew up in the church and was bombarded on all sides by what we might cal today memes casting doubt on Christianity. I always believed in God, but like many people I was filled with doubts and unanswered questions. It's only with the help of TH-cam that I have finally solidified my faith in Jesus, and the Bible. Yes, I watch debates, I listen to competing theories. There are a lot of good sounding theories, but they all fall apart when taken as a whole. Yet, the Bible continues to outshine all other theories when properly examined.
Well said. May the Lord bless all who call on Him, and to the ones He has yet to call on.
If you are believing book that has been manufactured by man then you are indeed a gullible person. Much has been written about the bible and its true authors .... you only have to google and read. Spoiler alert: No one is coming to save you, me or the family next door ..... wars will come and go like famine in the 21st century. Man is basically a barbarian wearing a suit.
I am so happy to see this! He use to come to my house for dinner after church! A long time ago.
Please dear sir, write a book. Please publish a book that will be accessible to all and will be available long after you’re gone. You have a wealth of wisdom and knowledge. Please immortalize it by publishing.
You mean write a paper, for a peer reviewed journal. Anyone can write a book.
@@kosgothWhere do you think what he is refuting comes from?
@@prn72271 idk probably an echo chamber . not a paper published in a scientific journal that's for sure.
Yes, write a book so you can publish your unchallenged falsehoods.
Don't write a scientific paper where your beliefs can be blown apart by evidence.
Please keep preying on the scientific ignorance of your audience to keep reaping in that money.
Not bad for a high school dropout!
I recommend any book by Dr Jonathan Sarfati, Refuting Evolution, The Greatest Hoax on Earth A Refutation of Dawkins' Greatest Show on Earth, By Design, and his commentary, The Genesis Account.
I'm a game dev. I can make a simple universe in a weekend. I can program the "natural processes" like erosion for example. I don't even need to be present once I execute. With enough time, knowledge and power I could sim our universe to the atom. I would be the watch maker. My simulated humans could have free will to choose. I can give them attributes before they are conceived that I would be completely aware of. I could make my universe scale to full in 6 in game days with the appearance of thousands. None of this would be random unguided processes. Even if it appeared so to my sims. The best part? Trying to make them understand my world and their place would be quite challenging. I would be beyond their understanding.
I'm a highschool dropout. If I can do this....
Imagine what's out there beyond what people claim to know. How many true things are beyond the reach of your senses? Magnetism, electricity, DNA, radiation are all discoveries, excavated from reality. None are scientific inventions. We don't even know what gravity is or how it works.
The fool says there is no God, sitting in their little corner of infinity.
Random natural unguided processes?
Pure fantasy. It's a joke. The evidence is blinding if you have the courage to actually consider it.
( edit: My responses won't show. My fundamental claim is that it is feasible the universe is created. Multiple overlapping contingent systems are likely not accidental. How many perfect dice rolls (back to back) are you willing to believe are "strange coincidences". What sum = proof? )
🥇
Well said. All discoveries are just waiting to happen. But men would rather praise themselves than praising He who made it be. They rather give credit to randomness in order to exalt their ego. The fool said in their heart there's no God. Their "wisdom" is turned into foolishness.
Lol in my 40 years of being a Christian, and I consider myself a devoted scientist, I love your post :-).
Last but not least, I have not looked but is there a Sim Universe out there? I also was a software developer but not your caliber, but I have thought it would be cool to have an object oriented DNA creation simulator, have not looked for one of those either.
Whatever can be imagine can be created. The laws of physics keeps changing because what is imagined, and manifests from imagination, the laws of physics have to alter, and expand to account for the impossible stuff of imagination.
@@fibo12358 Thanks. I appreciate it. I don't think those sims are available, .... Yet.
This is POWERFUL… i am a preacher, but I learned a lot from this anointed professor
You learn how to lie and spread bible bullshit
It's like learning how to build a house from a chef. 😅
@@lionzion1879you are saying that because you didn't hear the falsehood you want to hear...if you have a better argument come out and debunk his claims the prize money is still available for grab 😅😅😅
Nothing can create nothing but Nothing 😮.
@@lionzion1879 yes because you must first go pay to get indoctrinated before you know something 😂😂
@@fadaelviz7212 prize money? It's all for show, it's not worth the money when debating idiocy.
WOW!!! To God be all the Glory Amen ❤❤❤
Amen
Amen
Amen
Father God, Thank You so much for men like this. You are so AMAZING.
Amazing? Debatable. Right? No.
What you mean? god sending people that talk about a subject that they don't know 😂😂😂
I like what this man is doing.
He’s not a pastor collecting tithes and offering.
He has distinguished himself from other by embarking on a unique journey that will make people remember him after he’s long gone.
I am not a pastor, and i collect nothing, but I will try to share honoring tithes and offerings. I give tithes and offerings because these are needed for the church( not the building but the body) to function and work on reaching everyone with the gospel. If you are a true ambassador of the Kingdom of God, you will be looking at where to give tithes and offerings, because your business is to promote God's kingdom.
Now when you don't tithe, this is not sin, but those who tithe without are making a covenant with God since God is a God of covenant. So even though not tithing is not a sin, those who tithe get the benefit those who don't will not get. it is like going to the gym improves your health while those who don't go don't have the benefit of those who go. Of course, any pastor or man of God forcing you to tithe is wrong. but please let us understand well what tithing and offerings are before speaking against them in general.
Tithing and offering are spiritual exercises of faith. and God sees all those who do it and the reason in their hearts and reward everyone according to their motives
You don’t think pastors should be paid for teaching, preaching, leading people to Christ, counseling and being available for service 24/7? Dr. Coleman seems to think so.
@@PastorBrianBetsworth no I don't think pedophiles should be paid to abuse children
So you lot mean to tell me before God so loved the world to the extent that he would give his only son to be violently assaulted and murdered to shed his blood, he actually committed a genocide on a global scale with a big big flood????
Now as a good Christian who is extolled (in Matthew 5:48 ) to be perfect like God, would you kill all your children who have become wayward in order to give yourself a new start?? Please dont answer to me.
It's just food for thought for yourself.
As a human with far less intellect and compassion than God, wouldn't the destruction of your children be the last thing on your mind as a solution, especially if you have the power to change/reform them just by the power of your own pronouncements?
Now check this. The bible says, God REGRETTED for creating humans and decided to commit such an act as a solution to pervasive sin. And then after this act also he regretted again??? and the promised to never do so again using a rainbow as a sign of covenant?
God killed everyone in a flood with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. Did it work?
He burnt Sodom and Gomorrah too it never worked,
He ordered the Amelikites to be assaulted women and children killed, that too never worked,
He again resorted to the violent murder of his own child, and still! today there is pervasive sin.
for ascribing such spectacular failure to God how long before you realized that all this could only be borrowed myth? How long? How fucking long?
We the followers are the church.not a building.give to the needy. That's what God said
Simply Put: GOD SPOKE THROUGH THIS MAN. That is what i can say.
How do you know this with this degree of certainty?
"GOD SPOKE THROUGH THIS MAN."
Which is why he was wrong.
I can say a literal snake spoke through him, but it doesn't make it true.
That explains how we got everything about evolution wrong. Either he is ignorant on it, or he lied to fool his creationist followers.
Anil (and team), this is the first time in my life seeing this show - had no idea it existed. Compliments on your presenting (and the team's hard work), you're doing a fine job - Praise God. Love from 🇿🇦
SAME HERE!!!!
Same with me, and I am also South African.. 🤝🤝😒🤞👍
God’s wisdom was poured into this professor’s brain😍
He's a Law professor with an undergrad's understanding of biology....whatchutalkin bout....Katie?
@@daviddavenport9350lol. Then take him on. You can win $20000!!!!! Go for it!
Although... I know you wont.
You can see it from the start. This guy is REALLY smart.
@@daviddavenport9350what's your degree in?
He's a Law professor with an undergrad's understanding of biology and I have a degree in engineering. I would not try to explain law to this man and I don't expect him to explain biology to me or anyone else unless he is qualified in that field. He is explaining a belief he has, if I was explaining a belief I had in something that was concerned with the law and getting it wrong I would expect to be called out for it by people with knowledge and not by people with beliefs.
Glory to the Lord. May God bless this man.
I love this episode ❤
Amen and Amen! God still has His people! He will never leave us groping in darkness! Hallelujah!!!
Hmm, seems to me you are groping in the darkness. Read a science book, see the light!
@@hongotedesco8931 take your own advice and read the bible before you knock it as BS. also if you blindly follow what scientists that are payed to spin a narrative say your shooting yourself in the foot.
Thank you. This was so interesting and makes me realize what a wonderful God we worship. 🙏🙏🙏🙏
If we just trust God and humble ourselves He elevates us. What a great man.
So trust god/s to get 'elevated' - yes, you guys always want and need to be 'something.'
Which God, there's an assortment
@@houmm08 clearly common sense would tell you we are talking about the Christian God as obviously stated in the video. 🙄
@@veridicusmaximus6010 you know elevation doesn’t mean becoming famous. It sometimes means to succeed in your work. Maybe you should try having some work we can all look back on than spreading your blatant hatred because others choose to have a faith and you chose not to.
Thanks
@@hzlkelly Yes, I'm aware. I'm also aware that the 'prosperity' gospel is crap - at least from the NT perspective. Following God/Jesus so you can elevate just shows your true motive for following him - it has nothing to do with the truth or reality - you guys choose comfort over truth because you can't handle reality without your useful fictions. And speaking the truth is not hatred particularly with the clown in the video. He should know better being educated and a lawyer. But you know what they say liar lawyer what's the difference. So is he lying or just completely ignorant?
The Good Lord will bless you abundantly Professor.
When we see a metropolis, we think of the architects. When we look at the intricate inner workings of a swiss watch, we think of the watch-maker. When we look at the immensely complicated machinery of the human cell, which works like a metropolis & swiss watch on the molecular level, we think of the Architect & Watch-Maker, not random processes.
And the only reason you think of the architect and the watchmaker is because of the overwhelming amount of physical evidence that you can see, touch,and witness for yourself that leaves you with no other choice Then to be convinced humans are Responsible for not only the creation of the watch and the building but These creations of human beings have evolved from the very simple, As is the case with the human created sun dial, to the very complex human created Rolex wristwatch.
The very simple mud and grass hut shelters, To the very complex skyscraper.
For the bible tells me so is not evidence that a character from a book Created Anything.
@@RobertSmith-gx3mi what you've presented is overly simplistic sophistry. Do we necessarily need to 'see, touch' or feel something to know it's real? No, we don't. Does something need to be tangible to be real? No, it doesn't.
90% of the universe is made up of something called dark matter which we can't 'see', feel, 'touch' or even measure directly (it has to be measured indirectly from the speed of light & is so subtle that it hardly exerts gravity). Yet it is real and in abundance in the universe.
Simple mud huts? Sure. Fact is, simple or complex, someone still made them. They are created. So, I'm really unsure what your argument is.
@@RobertSmith-gx3mimud huts didn't evolve into skyscrapers 😂 There were intelligent creative beings building them. ☦❤🕊
@@skunkape5918 The evolution of the building from hut to skyscraper was a play on words meant to highlight the evolving complexity, style, and artistic design of the humam amimal.
@@RobertSmith-gx3mi i understand what you were going for. Peace 🕊
I’ve studied astronomy, astrophysics, quantum mechanics, history and theology and my scientific background and my biblical faith are married together in a grand symphony of creation. I love when people of intelligence can erudite their faith in God with science. “The fool has said in his heart ‘There is no God’”
I wish professor was my lecturer in Jurisprudence, maybe I'd have continued pursuing my law degree. Lol, I was in Africa though. My lecturer told us to forsake God if we were believers. Sadly, many did stop believing. I chose my faith; it was a constant battle between my faith and the philosophers whose arguments I had to read and vouch for lol.
You folks worship your masters imaginary god
@hzkelly I'd sure like a lecture in jurisprudence..
Kudos to your lecturer for trying to save you from wasting your brain. That is something we rarely see in Africa. His efforts were in vain but he tried.
God doesn't seem to like AFRICA 😆😆😆
It's amazing that you stood your ground, I pray you continue to do so and that God will strengthen and bless you
Also, it took 100 years to build (one guy! Maybe his sons helped),
When people asked “what are you doing?”
He said “building an arc because when it’s done, God is gonna make it rain and flood the planet!”
Rain? What is rain?
(It had never rained previously.)
They laughed at him!
100 years of mockery!
When he pulled the door closed the rain began.
It covered every mountain.
No more mockery!
Today, we’re at it again.
Mind you, anyone who believed could get in the boat.
Nobody believed!
Global unbelief is not a strange thing.
Christ is the new Moses type!
Anyone who wants in the boat is welcome.
Anyone who wants to stand with the mockers is welcome to do so also.
Free choice!
Mostly true, except that Noah did not pull the door shut. Angels did that.
I believe Methuselah was one of those who helped in the construction.
Amazing details you can all spout for something that never actually happened.
Too bad that the ENTIRE WORLD, with the exception of Israel, never experienced or historically recorded this " worldwide" flood !!!
Nowhere does it say anywhere that anyone else was welcome. The story literally say as build an ark for you and your family. As far as we know, no one else was welcome.
@hdmaragh This is true.
God decided to murder (the BIG hypocrite) every man, woman, child, and baby on Earth, including nearly all of the animals and plants, except for Noah's family!
To God be the Glory for this revelation!
AWESOME!!!!! God bless this man of God!
This man's explanation is incredibly rock solid! Well done.
I agree.*Don't forget to like and subscribe for more. Thanks friend
”Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.“
Hebrews 11:1
That’s right!
FAITH: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.
Good! You read the bible!
@veridicusmaximus6010
WRONG: Incorrect
FAITH: Trust
I hope this helps. Peace and God speed
@@jaredmarcelli2919Sure:
FAITH: Trust without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.
Noah was not afraid of the animals on the Arch. He perpetrated a sacrifice of one individual for each species he climbed 7 onboard before they were freed. Not exactly frightened. And this part of the scripture is key to understand the most vegan book on Earth.
interesting. *don't forget to like and subscribe for more content friend!
This was amazing and rich in knowledge and wisdom. God bless Mr. Coleman. I’m always in awe of my Creator God almighty. ❤️❤️✝️🙏🏽
Glad you enjoyed it*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thank you friend.
Thank you for uploading this! So much good stuff in such a short video ❤
Evolution has been dismantled so many times over the years, even within the secular scientific community....but it's nice to see a fresh face have at it.
@@OlivierGaffuri-wc2dl if you're truly interested in a different opinion, I'd suggest 'Darwin's Dilemma'. They explore how the Cambrian explosion can't be explained by the prevailing theory/ideas behind evolution. They're not exactly Young Earth Creation Christians either.
@@OlivierGaffuri-wc2dl Also, there are people who do not believe the Bible but see evidence all over the world of a global flood, Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson come to mind. A global flood would burry animals in perfectly even rock layers, which would refute the idea of them slowly being laid over millions of years. Again, these people are not Christians. They're just open minded people with questions based on observations that challenge the common narrative.
If evolution is not real, how come humans have different "racial" features?
We should all look the same then since we all descended from one man and one woman.
It has never been "dismantled", depending on how you define that word.
@@degaussingatmosphericcharg575 the mainstream evolution narrative has been proven impossible at worst, questionable at best.
First time listening, been saved nearly 50 years and I totally agree with him. So far he's right on point. Great man of God. I pray God's blessings on him.
Then he should stick to religion and leave science to the scientists.
He lied and misrepresented scientific facts from start to end. I feel sorry for you since you think what he said is true.
It is easy to strawman someones position to make it easy to take down like he did, and that's the best case scenario. Worst case is that he doesn't even understand what he is debating against, making him an idiot.
If you want to learn about evolution, read biology books and attend open colleges or university classes on biology. That will ensure you know what you are debating against.
The moment you misrepresent science (intentional or not), I cannot take you seriously. I just look at you as a fool.
All praises to God for giving His servants wisdom to help us understand the things of God. With humans it's impossible with God all is possible and we see that in the story of the flood. Thank you professor for preaching truth uplifting God and His plan for humanity 🙏 ❤
This guy is brilliant! Of course, the emotionally driver non-believers just refuse to see the facts
OK! Trot out the evidence that a supernatural realm exists and that supernatural entities exist there... The world has been waiting for thousands of years and all they get is a big goose egg on this question.
@gerardgauthier4876 it takes faith and nobody argues that, just like it takes faith to believe that life came from non life which is a scientific impossibility. It takes more faith to be an atheist. How does a pot of soil grow a seed? It takes a being with intelligence to water it, correct? Now think of that on a bigger scale with a deeper thought process, how does plants in a forest grow without a an intelligent being watering it? It takes intelligence on a larger scale to open the clouds to rain upon these plants to grow them just as it takes you planting a seed in a pot and watering it. Just a different view on things. It takes faith to believe in the creator. Jesus lived and died and rose again. That takes faith to believe but He promises us eternal life if we believe in His resurrection. Have faith my friend it will save you from Hell.
@@davemorrill2490 do you have a source for this amazing scientific discovery that abiogenesis is impossible?
@lmoelleb I did. The order of life proves intelligence. Let me ask what you believe so I know what I'm getting myself into, and I know what kind of evidence you would like.
@@davemorrill2490 when I ask for a source for a scientific discovery, then the primary source would be scientific papers, but a secondary source (a reliable publication) referring to it is probably a better starting point. They are typically easier for us laypersons to understand and if we can correlate a few of them we should start getting an idea of the current scientific understanding. People debating or making statements without scientific papers to back them up are not following the scientific process, and they are therefore not scientific and irrelevant as scientific evidence.
For what I believe. I believe we do not yet know how life originated. We have demonstrated amino acids can form naturally, but this is not enough to claim we know more than a few of the needed parts - or said in another way: there is no current theory of abiogenesis.
So what i "believe" is: I believe "we do not know". Notice that is "we do not know", not "we do not know, therefore God". Humans have stuffed God or other supernatural in as an explanation for things we do not know again and again - one would think we learned from our mistakes, but no. I do not know how thunder and lightning happens, therefore Thor - oh, it was electricity. I do not know why people get sick, therefore demons - oh, it was germs. I do not know why there are earthquakes, must be god - oh, it was plate tectonics. I do not know why there are all these species, must be God - of it was evolution, ...
the interviewer is really good at his job
Thanks!
I agree, he allows for a natural flow and doesn’t get in the way of the topic or make it about himself! His technique should be studied and copied!
@@michaelsmith7995 true
I see the bar is very low here. All you have to do is to claim there is a God
Similar to atheists claiming the universe created itself. @@ntsokolomemani3874
Thanks God @Major Coleman for defending the truth using science and archeological evidence like the story of the Arch of Noah. God bless Major.🙏🙏🙏 and this channel Anıl Kanda❤️❤️❤️
But...he's not "defending the truth", he is in fact telling you a bunch of lies. Right here right now, I'm actually defending the truth.
@@hongotedesco8931what lies did he tell?
@@Matthewc5610 We can start with the Earth is 7k years old. That's just a blatant lie.
@@hongotedesco8931 that doesn’t answer my question, he states the things from the textbook on evolution, that’s what I was referring to, not the age of the earth.
@@Matthewc5610 Um, it does answer the question "what lies did he tell". I pointed out one lie. Now, if you want to get specific, that's fine. But I'm not sure what you're referring to when you say "he states things from the textbook on evolution". What precisely did he state? And what's your point?
Major snapped kudos too fitting the puzzles pieces in by simply reading
Thank You Jesus !!! My redeemer
This man is awesome
True. An awesome comedian
The Irony of a Law professor rejecting Evolution when Creationism and ID have lost in court several times as "not science" isn't lost on me.
@@kosgoth
Why is it that you feel the need to minimize others in order to make a point? Also, how is a lawyer debating an opposite position ironic? In my opinion, he seems to be the perfect person for the job. He has all the proper training to prove his point. All it would take is researching both sides and comparing the evidence. There is a lot of creationist scientist in the world that rejects evolution, so the data is there for a good debate.
So a judge concluding that the “intelligent design claim had no scientific merit” and could not “uncouple itself from religion” is somehow enough proof for you? You don’t think it took an intelligent designer to create all the order and precision in our universe? from the molecular level to the order of the galaxies? But somehow taking God out of it and saying we’re all here by accident/chance is somehow science.
Evolution has a lot of holes in its theory. For example, there’s no fossil evidence for the intermediary stages of any species on Earth.
How does the universe arises from nothing and then explodes in a bang?
Where did the energy come from for the explosion to take place?
Where does consciousness come from?
How are we able to discover math in an accidentally created universe?
umm sound like a religion to me lol
But the bible doesn’t get enough credit. Once upon a time, people claimed a flat earth rested on top of elephants. The Bible always claims it to be a circle/sphere (Isaiah 40:22) and suspended on nothing (Job 26:7) before anyone. If you think about it, evolution is only popular today because of indoctrination. Most of us are taught to believe it from a very young age and it would be taboo to refute it.
@@inboxmail2053 If you say so...
Because he is a lesser. So are the people that accept this nonsense, just like flat Earthers.
These claims are known by the relevant scientists and they know they are meritless. eg. Entropy refers to usable energy in a system. not complexity, we get energy from the sun via plants. Evolution doesn't violate that. A living body or set of bodies, or species etc, isn't an enclosed system. The Prof is wrong. I could go on every point but that would be a major response.
Any of these topics are available on the internet.
pewresearch Darwin Day 6 from 2019
Scientists overwhelmingly agree that humans evolved over time, and most Americans are aware that this is the case. Among scientists connected to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 98% say they believe humans evolved over time.
In court it has repeated failed for
In Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (2005)
District Judge John E. Jones III ruled that intelligent design is not science but “a religious argument” and “nothing less than the progeny of creationism.”
There is no science to creationism. It is false.
This professor is a genius, I hope his students will listen to him. Considering that most professors now think there are more than two genders, this guy is a breath of fresh air.
Yes! Please like and follow
Yea his lies are indeed ingenious, like that evolution would claim doghs and cats should be able to interbreed, when in reality that would disprove evolution. Guess being a lawyer helped him find lies that are easily believabler if you are clueless
major coleman is awesome with his teaching thank god we still have minds like this on earth
I am genuinely interested in learning how Professor Coleman explains why the age determination by the Radiocarbon 14 Method (which seems to measure time periods far greater than 6000 years) yields incorrect results. - As I said: honestly interested.
He has a website where he responds to these questions. Power station something?
It's the rate that carbon "expires". There was a science book I took in Classical Conversations that had a zebra on the front that explained the nitty gritty of this very thing! It specifies the math etc. I don't remember the details but I remember it being very exacting!
I remember the science being called stoichiometry. I LOVED it!
Classical Conversations is a homeschooling group.
BANGER❤️
Totally blown away,my goodness thank you GOD
Incredible. Thanks so much brother Coleman!!!!’ Praise be to God.
Yes, it was amazing.
Excellent, the more I studied science to closer I got to the truth all around in the world including God Himself. Thank you, Professor Collman.
Amen! *Don't forget to like and subscribe to my channel please! Its appreciated.
I looked him up and he has not a single science degree i could find , this is a blurb about his position in 2022-2023 i think "Coleman, who will teach Wills and Trust, most recently taught at the New Paltz State University of New York. Coleman has nearly a dozen publications on various research topics, including American politics, public law, political economy, religion and politics and Black politics. Coleman earned his JD from the University of Maryland at Baltimore, a PhD at the University of Chicago, and most recently, he finished his J.S.D. at Emory Law School. VERY IMPRESSIVE....BUT NOT A SINGLE BIT OF SCIENCE SEEMS TO BE INVOLVED IN HIS LIFE!!!!!
I cannot believe that no credible evolutionist is terrified to debate this man . The problem with God is who created “ God”. Respect
His science qualification is the Bible and his relationship with God. You must remember they claim God is the God of science. So in his world he is more than qualified as a scientist
You reject the concept of God, then say your strawman proves there is a problem. God is by definition uncreated. No problem there.
@@ntsokolomemani3874 your post is pretty nonsensical
YOU'RE just showing the innate intelligence of this bonafide Israelite with your commentary.
I enjoyed this show.
It’s beautiful to see such passion for the Word of God.
Thank you so much.
but its weird that he never had a point and his stories don't make sense.
The event of Noah. Sometimes when we call these event stories people that's the more why there's confusion. I try not to call biblical events as stories. I may be wrong on this but I fully agree with all Major says in this video.
The part about Noah's flood is one of the major issues I have with the Bible. If the genealogies in Genesis are correct, the flood would have occurred around 2348 BC. However, there were at least 4 major civilizations that existed at that time that were uninterrupted (Norte Chico, Egyptian, Sumerian, and Indus Valley). Also, if it happened at that time, then how did the civilizations get to the Americas? Either the flood was a localized event and was embellished in the Bible, or it didn't happen at all and is just a parable. And, if it was recorded by Moses, which people still aren't sure about, then it would have been recorded more than 1000 years after the flood, which gives the narrative plenty of time to be changed. Many of the books in the Old Testament are sketchy.
It was most likely a localized event written down in some babylonian book, and then story was then "borrowed" by the bible.
Parable??? with all those detailed measurements and specified materials? Even Jesus’ parables didn’t go to those lengths. If it were a myth Jesus was mistaken to refer to the days of Noah.
The Bible says it is foolishness to those who are perishing, much like the people of Noah's time. "Fool, building a boat on dry land."
The world flood is totally a myth.
Everything else is sketchy, the Bible is the truth.
Ive been a Young Earth Creationist since '98 not long after I got Born Again.
In those 26 years atheists have not come up with any new evidence or arguments for evolution.
If anything, we have discovered even more complexities in the cell like interactomes which make Darwinian Chemical evolution even more impossible.
I love this model of Noah's Ark, there's also a man in Denmark, Johan Huibers in Dordrecht, Netherlands. who actually built a full scale model of the Ark which took him 20years.
Why were you expecting atheists to give you proof for evolution? Were the early contributors to evolution atheists? Are microbiologists atheists? Evolution is a scientific fact it has absolutely nothing to do with atheism. Evolution theory is supported by atheists and theists. Ironically everyone that opposes Evolution is a theist. That is a good pointer to the group with an agenda
Keep talking out your ass -
Yes! God never asks for a blind faith.
If you’re referring to the Christian God, he exclusively asks for blind faith. If the Bible is to be believed, that is.
@@theatheistcowboy4227biblical faith is 'sure of what we hope for and certain of what we see'. No blind faith
@@allenminter4728 “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe” - Jesus, supposedly
@@theatheistcowboy4227
Context on this one matters.
None of us have physically seen Jesus. That would mean every living Christian is doing it wrong. Or,... Or maybe you just need a little more understanding.
He was talking to Thomas about his doubts. Thomas was the only one who had not seen him alive after his crucifixion. It's not a call to blind faith...
@@theatheistcowboy4227and you weren't there at the big bang nor have you seen any forms of macro evolution?
I love this Brother. Thank you for what you are doing. God bless you and keep you safe.
Major is a powerhouse, indeed.
There is Epic of Gilgamesh . How do you explain that Major ?
The Epic of Gilgamesh and Genesis may just stem from the same historical event, that's why they are similar. Both stories have an ark, but the one described in Genesis is seaworthy, the one in the Epic of Gilgamesh is not. Also, just because the Epic of Gilgamesh may be older doesn't mean it's the source for Genesis.
@@Meow-xx6oo Gilgamesh must be a giant giving his side of the story.
Remember they were destroyed yet some survived, as Genesis 6 says there were giants before the flood and after that. Therefore some must have survived in something unsubmersible of sort, the story of Enki tells exactly that. The so called mythologies are various tales from the perspective of these "men of renown", caried over and embellished by the "loosers"
In any case these giants/nephilim give credit to the genesis account, even from their twisted mind, we gather that the flood was reaL, it's the TRUTH and that's what matters.
Let's choose who we follow.
Foolishness
He said something that made cry, he said through revelation you get the knowledge. His explanation corroborate the truth that God Himself has revealed about the 6k years of His management plan. So powerful, though you can not understand it unless it's revealed to you.
revealed how? In a dream or when high on drugs?
I pray our Lord Jesus Christ Blesses everyone 🙏 ❤️
God Bless this brother and his family!
“I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science. It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaws and holes as sound parts.” -C. Darwin
Amen
yea because back then it was, it is hillarious that you think we learned nothing in the last almost 200 years
@@daftwulli6145 what's hilarious is that you didn't respond by telling us who has been observed in your family lineage who was not human.
@@refuse2bdcvd324 NIce straw man buddy. You get a gold star on your report card for creating such an utterly disingenious and dishonest argument
That is not how evolution works. WE HAVE directly observed the evolution of new species, and WE HAVE found over 6000 transitional fossils spanning more then 20 transitional species just for human evolution alone. But instead of arguing against the actual evidence and what we are actually saying you first completely misrepresent what we are saying and then argue against that instead
@@refuse2bdcvd324 So on some level you must realize that we are right and that you cannot argue against the facts and arguments we present, or why else would all of you do what you just did ?? Or they outright lie about what science says and then argue against that.
while in 20 years I have never seen a creationist make an genuine argument against what we are really saying . NOT EVEN ONCE
Btw doesn´t lying go against the core values of your religion ?? So not only are you being a hypocrite about evolution, youi are being a hypocrite about yxopur own religion as well.
This is powerful message.
Yes true!
Yes, and that message is, "Blind faith and denial of facts will keep you ignorant." Blissfully, though, I expect.
Let’s see the debates .
No one is debating him even though he offered money. 😂🤣
Amen praise the lord ,divine creator
Thats right!
This is exactly the stuff that Kent Hovind does and I'm so grateful you've presented this bit as well. Easy to understand and broken down to something reasonable. P.S. I would love to see if you could come to Campbell University here in North Carolina. They used to be a Christian school, but have recently broken off from the Baptist convention and have started becoming a little too "liberal" if you know what I mean.
“This is exactly the stuff that Kent Hovind does…”
What a fitting statement. Yes, they are both willfully ignorant.
@@theatheistcowboy4227 Name specifically what he or Kent Hovind says is scientifically wrong? You're paid to make responses like this.
@@josefniederer5039 I’m paid to make responses to TH-cam videos? The fuck are you on about, mate? 🤣
And it’s precisely because I DON’T get paid to comment or teach and have to do other work that I will not be teaching Biology 101 here. If you want a quick one to check “Dr.” Hovind on, try seeing if you can find him defining what a “kind” is and then see how long it takes you to find an animal or plant that doesn’t fit that definition. Or perhaps Dr. Coleman’s take on cats and dogs breeding. If cats and dogs could breed that would actually disprove the theory of evolution as it actually exists. According to the theory of evolution, cats and dogs most definitely should not be able to breed. If you’d like to know more, there are many many sources on both TH-cam and educational journals. I am not a science, teacher, or a paid “evolution, promoter“ or whatever the hell you think I am. I am just a man who loves science education and hates scientific misinformation.
@@josefniederer5039 watch the millions of times he's been debunked lmao
name specifically one time he's been debunked. If you're confident in your statement then provide your proof he's been debunked.@@ferociousrazordino3581
I love when people who clearly have no idea what they’re even arguing against think that they’re going to disapprove the most sound scientific theory in the field of biology. As if they who don’t even understand the theory, see something that people who have studied it for the vast majority of their lives, didn’t see. it would be downright hilarious if only it didn’t mislead even more people into thinking they know what the theory of evolution even proposes, let alone that it’s been debunked.
And I see plenty of people on here who think they’re going to argue that this law professor has all the facts straight about what the theory of evolution is, and says should happen according to said theory. Let me make it clear now: he could not be more objectively incorrect. He does not understand what the theory of evolution is or says. If you were to spout this in a base level college biology class, he would probably be corrected by freshman in the first two minutes of speaking, and it would only get worse from there.
Yet evolutionists have largely avoided debates with creationist , and when they have agreed the weight of scientific evidence to support creationism has invariably overwhelmed them . Why ? Because the evolutionists theories don't stand up to empirical scrutiny !!!
Well said. This video has me gobsmacked in its ignorance. And people just lap it up. Faith scares the crap out of me.
Evolutionism is a tautology and therefore false.
I love this professor. I wish to hear his 2nd speech
Follow me for more. Hopefully we can interview him soon.
That model is pretty big but it is dwarfed by the 1 to 1 model in Kentucky - of course it is easier to carry around.
Single to multicellularity has been demonstrated in the lab. The Methusaleh tree is 4,855 years old which predates the traditional date for the flood, but so does Pando which is 80,000 years old.
Sure, a single sperm and a single ova connect to make a single animal, sometimes 2 if there are identical twins.
Parthenogenesis is a myth
@@marionchase-kleeves8311 In what way is parthenogenesis a myth?
4855 years old! That is still a estimate a tree grows according to what the experienced year after year of water fall temperature and nutrients. And data doesn't go back that far especially in its region. What temperature data goes a little over 100 yrs. Until you can cut it down and count rings maybe you could get a closer estimate. Next point when was Adam and Eve created? Some estimates are approximately 9700 yrs ago or 55,000-120,00 or most popular estimate 6000 yrs. So let us say 6,000....... 6000 - 1656 = 4344 yrs! To me that estimate is close enough that it to prove it was after the flood. If a tree grows where there is good soil and rain it will out grow a tree in poor soil and poor rain fall or just in not so friendly conditions. I've seen trees in Reelfoot Lake that over 200 yrs old that are the size of the same tree as one that are approximately 10 yrs. I know of two trees my father planted the same time and one is over 50 ft and the other is 20 ft. They are about 75 yards apart. One is next to a pond and grows slower. Same Cypress trees in Reelfoot lake. Estimates are approximate....... unless you know all the history even stamped dates can mislead.
@@marionchase-kleeves8311 0.8 percent of the women (45 total) reported becoming pregnant without having vaginal sex. so how is it a myth. The oldest recorded mother to date to conceive was 74 years old. who told you it was a myth LOL
theirs three types of dating tho The three methods of dating are: relative dating, radiometric dating, and absolute dating. All methods of measurement - not just radiometric dating - can give wrong results if used incorrectly or inappropriately.
This Professor is amazing
Why?
Because he can convince all these people to give them their money…
So you lot mean to tell me before God so loved the world to the extent that he would give his only son to be violently assaulted and murdered to shed his blood, he actually committed a genocide on a global scale with a big big flood????
Now as a good Christian who is extolled (in Matthew 5:48 ) to be perfect like God, would you kill all your children who have become wayward in order to give yourself a new start?? Please dont answer to me.
It's just food for thought for yourself.
As a human with far less intellect and compassion than God, wouldn't the destruction of your children be the last thing on your mind as a solution, especially if you have the power to change/reform them just by the power of your own pronouncements?
Now check this. The bible says, God REGRETTED for creating humans and decided to commit such an act as a solution to pervasive sin. And then after this act also he regretted again??? and the promised to never do so again using a rainbow as a sign of covenant?
God killed everyone in a flood with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. Did it work?
He burnt Sodom and Gomorrah too it never worked,
He ordered the Amelikites to be assaulted women and children killed, that too never worked,
He again resorted to the violent murder of his own child, and still! today there is pervasive sin.
for ascribing such spectacular failure to God how long before you realized that all this could only be borrowed myth? How long? How fucking long?
How low is your IQ?
Beautiful overview of some great mysteries of Scripture. Thank you.
Glad you enjoyed it! *please subscribe for more
I enjoyed this very much will look for more on this topic
Great!
I've been to the Kentucky Ark that Ken Hamm's group constructed and it is very impressive.
I believe you and i also believe that's were everything should end at impressive. Nothing more nothing less. What they built is impressive but proves nothing
@@ntsokolomemani3874Then clearly you haven’t been. That ark is literally full of evidence. Sticking your head stubbornly in the sand does not count as counter evidence.
But is it as impressive as the Duripinar site in Turkey on the mountains of Ararat. Mountains being plural in scripture concerning Noah's Ark. Not only are the dimensions spot on, but ground penatrating radar showed right angles and the look of compartment remnants. It's certainly no mere rock formation. I hope to go soon. The Turkish government conducted these tests, and they even made a visitor center. The length is exact in royal Egyptian cubits, as Moses would have known, while the width is a little wider since ancient boats will splay. If the writer of the ancient story made it up by the boat shaped object's dimensions, it would have been these wide measurements. Instead it conforms with reality. Not to mention all the holed anchor stones dropped in the area, up in the mountains.
So a guy that dropped out of high school and has no formal education and biology somehow knows more than the people that study this for a living?
Right because completely trusting every scientist these days is proving a great thing to do. 😆
@@anilkanda611 nobody said completely trusting anybody. But you usually got to know what you're talking about before you can tell somebody else that they're wrong.
I'm going to trust the guy that went to flight school rather than the guy that went to the video arcade. Education is important.
Simple minds accept simple answers.
@@captdoug yes but thats called an “appeal to authority” fallacy. Attack the messenger because nothing substantive has been offered. I understand your point, friend but I have a background in epidemiology and etiology and I found his reasons completely plausible. He sits on panels with other scientists during conventions. I’m not claiming it’s every answer but I think it’s reasonable.
@@anilkanda611 thank you for the respectful dialogue. Have a great night.
@@captdoug you too 🙏🏽
Hi Kae: I am a PhD (Molecular/ Cellular Biology), Christian, and a signatory on the Dissent from Darwinism document published by the Discovery Institute. While I might not be able to convince you of the fallacy of Darwinism, I will assure you that I am extremely knowledgeable on these topics. Let’s agree to level-set on that point. Fair enough?
Kae made a comment on whether I know what I was talking about, and then deleted himself from the chat.
Me response to that particular troll was this:
Hi Kae: I am a PhD (Molecular/ Cellular Biology), Christian, and a signatory on the Dissent from Darwinism document published by the Discovery Institute. While I might not be able to convince you of the fallacy of Darwinism, I will assure you that I am extremely knowledgeable on these topics. Let’s agree to level-set on that point. Fair enough?
Thats awesome. Please continue commenting. We need more people like you engaging.
@@anilkanda611 Thank you. I’m one of many who recognize we just may be wrong, but one thing is for certain; natural selection operating on random mutations is most definitely NOT a viable theory. If Darwin were alive today, he’d chuckle at such a preposterous idea. With 160 yrs of knowledge about DNA and all of its complexities and “language,” post-Darwin, it’s an insult and detriment to our species to maintain the facade of evolution and natural selection. This nonsense needs to cease being foisted on the naive masses.
If you're a PhD of molecular and cellular biology, why aren't you publishing peer-reviewed research that shows evolution is wrong?
That’s an asinine question. My PhD gives me the professional authority to speak on the issue. I don’t need to publish on the subject to speak on it. How many topics do you spew from your blow hole, but haven’t published one peer-reviewed article on?
In my time, being a young earth creationist was about laughing at that person, not about admiring them for defending their foolishness.
It does. That just not true. If you believe in what constitutes "life" , you know very well evolutionary dynamics are used in the unifying theory of naturalism. *Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thanks friend!
Are you sure moon dust is dated that early?
Try google searching him in the UK… Even Wikipedia is not found… hardly anything comes up for him……. WOW!! the liberties to silence truth is real….
Interesting. That’s crazy
Liar! You can find all his stuff online and on Wiki.
New Love and Peace Family Always! Question: What was the 1st planet God created? Why aren't ANY of the planets or stars mentioned in Genesis? Is it better to do a thing good or to do it Right? Is Man a thought evolved Being or just a physically created Being? Who was God speaking to when He said 'Let there Be light'? Just curious to know if there are some mathematical reasons for the answers to these questions. I'll wait....🧐
It would be interesting to plan a debate between Major & Hugh Ross.
yea!
So the "expert" asked people to come forward with science and "prove we are wrong".
This shows a NON scientist, with zero idea of the scientific method wants to prove a negative - an impossibility inthe scientific method!
Then we see the "expert" has ZERO qualifications in science - yes, an appeal to authority by me initially, but when we have already shown he doesn't understand science it gains credibility!
Here it is again- a TH-cam commentator saying what is and what is not science.
@@anilkanda611 it's pretty simple. Science requires falsifiable evidence, repeatable and testable evidence, and be supported by the data. Opinion means NOTHING in science, just like guesses. It also means that if you don't know, you don't make stuff up.
Sir, like most of your comments on here, you make opinion based comments with no substance. I'm happy to provide citations but as you would well know, TH-cam does not allow me to vote them.
And for a lawyer to make "scientific" claims that he doesn't support with evidence simply enforced my point.
He is a well known apologist with a reputation for claiming science when there is none.
Address my comment on the "energy of a trillion billion atomic bombs" to show you have even a little understanding of the ridiculous claims he makes.
@@anilkanda611 but you just presented a LAWYER claiming to present science while giving you no evidence for his claims!
What even is a trillion billion🤔 and at 42Pj per nuke if he meant a billion trillion (or sextillion) then that is likely to be very damaging to the planet, like so damaging a wooden boat with 3 foot thick reinforced walls would be destroyed like match sticks, this is a REALLY BIG force that has been claimed so big a sizable quantity of material would be ejected into space!
So cool.
Evolution definitely happens, one of the things that critics of evolution say is that there are no transitional fossils but we do have transitional fossils like Archeopteryx. Archeopteryx is a fossil that has traits from both avian dinosaurs and modern birds, Archeopteryx has traits from modern birds like feathers and wishbones although some non-avian dinosaurs like velociraptor also had these traits, Archeopteryx also had traits from avian dinosaurs like long- boney tails, unfused 3 clawed fingers, and teeth, modern birds do not have these traits.
Actually mathematically, there should be transitional fossils everywhere but there are not. Read Stephen Jay Gould's stuff.
@@anilkanda611 Actually they are all transitional fossils. All species are in transition.
@anilkanda611
Archeopteryx isn't the only transitional fossil we find, we do find more fossils like archeopteryx like microraptor and xiaotingia zhengi. We also find transitional fossils that show the transition from amphibians to reptiles, reptiles to mammals whale evolution, and human evolution, I would be happy to show you these fossils. Also I am familiar with Stephen Jay Gould concept of punctuated equilibrium where fossils show stasis like in the case of ancient sharks showin little to no change to modern sharks or the Cambrian Explosion, it is true that some fossils show stasis but that in no way invalidates the transitional fossils that we do find.
@@anilkanda611
I doubt you have read any of Gould's writing. Only the endless misrepresented quotes in endless creationist writings. I also doubt you understand what PE is, and that it is an accepted model for explaining apparent sudden changes in species. Most creationists like to claim that PE is a mechanism for sudden evolution. That is not true. I suggest you read something written by Gould on the subject, not a quote but something substantial. Then come back and delete the "read Gould" advice out of shame.
“Now the appetite is twofold; namely, the will which is in the reason, and the sensitive appetite which follows on sensitive apprehension, and is divided into the irascible and the concupiscible, as stated in the First Part (Q. LXXXI., A. 2). Again the act of rendering his due to each man cannot proceed from the sensitive appetite, because sensitive apprehension does not go so far as to be able to consider the relation of one thing to another; but this is proper to the reason. Therefore justice cannot be in the irascible or concupiscible as its subject, but only in the will: hence the Philosopher (Ethic. v. 1) defines justice by an act of the will, as may be seen above (A. 1).” [Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, vol. 9 (London: Burns Oates & Washbourne, n.d.), 569.]
This man is brilliant
😂😂😂😂
For what shall it profit a man if he shall gain brilliance but employ it to promote ignorance?
Next up, we'll have a plumber discuss the illogical nature of Muslim beliefs. Stay tuned.
Next up, TH-cam keyboard warrior thinks they alone know who’s qualified to talk about anything. ^
Becoming as a little child and exercising your "Faith" (God gives everyone a measure) with repentance is all it takes to start your walk with God. Born-Again. The mind has to be brought into subjection to God by focusing on God. Being led by the "Holy Spirit" is far different from walking by natural sight/understanding, but can be accomplished by submission and experience. Those who choose to rebel have missed a chance to "walk with God" and experience Love, Joy & Peace in high definition. Walk On, and Close to God everyday! ☺♥†♪♫ 3-9-24
["Becoming as a little child and exercising your "Faith" (God gives everyone a measure) with repentance is all it takes to start your walk with God. "] Is there a reason God wants us to act like idiots?
@@iriemon1796 Amazingly enough many children are better examples than adults, and if they connect with God at an early age it is pronounced. Many people have chosen to act very irresponsibly. Actions can create reactions in a similar context. Lying starts at birth, but most bad behaviour and biases are learned at a young age. Walk On ! ☺♥†♪♫
q
So much knowledge here. Thank you Dr. Coleman
You are very welcome
Thank you for the opportunity to help us understand more Really Interview. God will reward you. It IS written that, men will hate you for my sake. So do not be too surprised. Do not be surprised that they hate God. And reject HIS Truth. They will all be very sorry. It would be sad but oh well. Their free choice
How do you know God will reward him? You speak for God now?
🥇
5:20 He says that revelation from god is _science??_
This man is no expert in critical thinking.
Says the guy who thinks billions of years of chance formed the solar system. Tell us more about critical thinking
@@anilkanda611
And why the Solar system couldn't form by natural causes?
@@anilkanda611 I suppose it could be called chance, but the solar system formed from a cloud of interstellar gas and dust. (Mostly hydrogen). An accretion disk developed around the central mass which was condensing into the sun. Gravity caused clumps to form in the accretion disk. As they got larger their gravity increased and most of the rest of the debris was pulled into them. These became the planets. We have seen this process taking pace in other star systems. When the central mass gets hot enough it is called a protostar. Further gravitational collapse eventually triggers nuclear fusion at the core. That's when it becomes a star.
One principle of critical thinking is accepting verifiable facts. Everything I just described is entirely consistent with what we observe in our own solar system and a handful of others that can be observed from a great distance. Go to Wikipedia and read about stellar evolution.
A building has a builder, a painting has a painter, and yet the most sophisticated creation, life, occurred spontaneously from nothing.
@@Sola_Scriptura_1.618
No. Science has never said that anything came from nothing!
Major did a good job explaining his scientific defense of biblical position. The ark made to scale gave an excellent visual aid
Thought so too
Did you hear him say how much energy was released when the water came from under the earth? He said "a TRILLION BILLION ATOMIC BOMBS" worth - his EXACT words - that is almost 2 MILLION bombs per every single square metre of the ENTIRE earth! (yes, I actually calculated it) Think about it for about 3 seconds after considering what ONE bomb did to Hiroshima!
Or consider how many workers built the replica ark for Answers in Genesis WITH tools, proven techniques, superior materials etc. and it still had problems (including water damage :)
Or his words about "Brown inventing hydro-plate theory".
Brown is unqualified in anything related to plate tectonics or similar, has NEVER published a scientific paper, NEVER had his for profit book peer reviewed, and has ZERO scientific evidence to support his "theory" (it is actually an unproven hypothesis, not a theory, but he would require scientific knowledge to understand that)
He claimed he uses science! Yet almost nothing he said is supported by ANY science!
He spoke of no life arising from single celled organisms - what exactly is a human embryo?
Its a single celled sperm, combining with a single celled ovum to form a 2 celled embryo, that then develops further into something like you or me - so YOU came from a 2 celled organism, again showing his science is BS.
He spoke about evidence of a worldwide flood - there is NONE. There is plenty to show there were floods, but none to show a worldwide flood at the same time, and ZERO evidence to support a world only 6-7000 years old.
When he discusses water covering the entire earth, he very conveniently overlooks that scientists have calculated the amount of water required would be an additional approx 3 times EXTRA water to what exists on the surface today - imagine what this would do to salinity, pH etc of current water sources, and so devastating water life, both animal and plant.
As for the ark, yes, it was visual - it showed terrible technique - no interleaving of timbers for example to give added strength, then showing ridiculous lengths of trees - where did he source straight trees at least 180 feet long in such great numbers? Zero evidence of trees that size ANYWHERE near the middle east. So basically his "great visual aid" was misleading , unrealistic, and unlikely.
want me to continue? ;)
The scale model isn't a good one for the Ark as the major problem (hogging and sagging) isn't visible on a scale model!
Pls do documents so that other generation can benefit from that great knowledge.
What a great interview. Such an intelligent man who is very easy to listen to.
Neville Goddard gives the best interpretation of the bible ❤ Absolutely beautiful! You’d fall even more in love with Jesus and God. More than you could ever imagine.
The same Neville Goddard that thinks we are all incarnate as God? You need to repent now, and trust in Jesus as the incarnate God who died for you sinful life and was raise on the 3rd day.
Neville Goddard was a man who said Jesus never existed and that our imagination is "god." This is heresy and blasphemy. Goddard was a simple con artist of his day and best, and an evil man deliberately leading people away from Christ at worst. Repent of this nonsense.
Neville Goddard was a freemason whose books sprinkled in metaphysical theories contradictory to the Word of God. This was not a secret, he was open about his beliefs throughout his writings. I'm curious about why you believe he has the best interpretation of the Bible when much of his writings were blasphemous. It could be an honest misinterpretation, but your promotion of him sounds more nefarious. As if you're trying to steer people into the opposite direction of Biblical truth. I say that as an ex new ager who has read Neville Goddard's books, so I am on high alert when I see things like this, so forgive me.
How do you reconcile the heat problem?
Elaborate.
@@anilkanda611 are you familiar with radioactive decay? If so, do a search on Young earth creationists. And the heat problem
@@anilkanda611 The RATE Group admitted that massive amounts of radioactive decay occurred during earth history but proposed a period of accelerated decay during Noah’s Flood to fit the resulting history into a young-earth timeframe. Finding a mechanism for the acceleration and dealing with the excessive heat and radiation it would generate posed major problems for the project. Catastrophic plate tectonics was proposed to explain continental movements in a short timeframe and serve as a trigger for Noah’s Flood, but other creationists rejected the idea citing hopeless chronological problems. Creationists have also sought to explain the order of the fossil record and the Ice Age in a young-earth timeframe. An examination of these efforts demonstrates the anti-scientific nature of using the Bible as a non-negotiable framework for earth history.
th-cam.com/video/1zylJA0bly0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=pGwov973jxOf73LD
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009Sc%26Ed..18.1341H/abstract
Beautiful 🙏
This looks like a skit right out of the Onion.
Holy shit
Debate Aaron Ra, Professor Dave, Forrest Valkai, Gutsick Gibbon for the 20,000
Those people argue that evolution is true because the God of the Bible isn’t true. That does not logically follow. Notice how they cannot argue for evolution without also contrasting it against Creationism. Take Creationism away and their arguments for evolution evaporate.
Why debate with people who are open atheists, claiming to be an atheist is claiming to know that there is absolutely no God. That is the most unintelligent claim ever, why argue with fools? To say there is no God is admitting yourself a fool. It takes more faith to be an atheist, what a weird religion.
Why debate with people who are open atheists, claiming to be an atheist is claiming to know that there is absolutely no God. That is the most unintelligent claim ever, why argue with fools? To say there is no God is admitting yourself a fool. It takes more faith to be an atheist, what a weird religion.
@@davemorrill2490 it’s always fascinated me the way you theists are so smug and condescending towards atheists as if not believing in magic and fairy tales is unreasonable.
@@notnero5280you believe nothing created everything and that order came out of absolute chaos.
Still waiting for my laundry to fold itself in the dryer...
Yeah that's not gonna happen just like a book doesn't write itself.
"God never asker for blind faith. It's always based on evidence." - Love this statement.
The fact that "most of it was empty."
Tells a story... God made room for all to be saved but how many wanted to be. 😢
Yes. Sad truth
@@anilkanda611no, he’s ruthless. Just read Numbers 31:15-18
@@Truthseek72563what God did in that account is called judgement. It's not like God wakes up one day and say "kill all the women. There's reasons for His actions and was explained in the same verse you mentioned. Which by the way He has every authority to do so because He's the author of life, He gives life and He can take it away. You're commenting about it as if you have a moral standard of some sort. Can I ask if there is no God, why is it wrong to murder people? Sorry for my english. It's not my main language.
We thank God for this man.
*Please like and subscribe to this channel for more content! Thank you friend.