This is why Muslims we should be mastering the Arabic language for the love for the Quran, it is a defence and the master key for our religion. If us Muslims didn’t stray away from the Arabic language then many anti Islamist that come up with dumb conclusions and idiotic assumptions will be afraid, cautious and even embarrassed to discuss anything related to Islam.
Mohamed *my last name is Ibrahim’s son* Its really very simple the difference between the bible and the Quran. The evil actions of men/women are documented in the bible (even from those who believe) However nowhere does God instruct people to do evil and detestable things, do you see jesus doing any detestable thing? No. But you do see madmuham doing many of these things. The issue and reason Islam will never succeed is you muslims claim Muhammad lived the perfect life and you should live as he did.
Ninja FEESE and why would i not, when i have read it with my own eyes and anyone who has eyes can. Like i said, islams problem is that it claims Muhammad lived a perfect life which he clearly lived the opposite as shown above
Ninja FEESE Evil + funny verses in the quran Muhammad had sex with a 9 year old girl, called aisha who he married when she was 6 If a married women owns a business and a man works for her, she should let him suck her nipples to act like he his her son and her his mother. So as to show her husband she is not sleeping with him The Quran permits prububescent marriage and sex Quran 65v4 and then Sura 33v49 confirms this evil Muhammad sucked on a boys tongue, muslim says it was his grandson and his lips (apparently this makes it acceptable 😂) Jesus said to fast in secret as to show god not others Contradicts ramadan Muhammad walked around covered in semen so his child bride had to scrap off the crust He had his followers suck each others fingers He allowed his followers to hire prostitutes He took the wife of his own adopted son to the later abolish adoption to justify himself He swore an oath saying he would stop having sex with his slave girl. Then has a revelation from allah saying he has to break that oath. (“Allah” encouraging lies) Falsely talks about a trinity between mary, jesus and allah saying they are all gods Muhammad himself said he was a victim of a magic spell which gave him false beliefs and revelations Every islamic country was conquered through wars/forcing people to convert or else they would die Muhammad road upon a unicorn to heaven one night randomly when he felt like it Muhammad revealed if he was having a false revelations, allah would cut off his aorta - in sura 69 44-46 we hear Muhammad aorta is being cut off According to ubai eben kall (master of the quran) sura 33 (most evil chapter in the koran) use to have as many verses as sura 2 (280) yet sura 3 only has 73verses
Three Events We Won’t See In Our Lifetime: 1. Neptune orbiting the sun for the second time since its discovery in 1846 (2174) 2. The return of Halley’s Comet for the 3rd time since 2020 (2209) *3. A Christian properly defending his religion (Never)*
@@ivonikolov2916 your gospels are corrupted and even Christian scholars admitted that, how do you want us to believe in it? How are you still believing in it? This is a joke😟
@@ivonikolov2916 🤔 at the same time u believe god was stripped n beaten and killed by his own creation n he was calling out to another God,n u r talking about weakness . U need some broom sticks to chew dude. This is ur siwak
And those two words do not differ much in meaning, because a king is also the owner of everything in his dominion. Allah (swt) is BOTH KING AND OWNER OF J.D.
I learned about this in a random Yusuf Estes lecture 15 years ago when I first became a Muslim. I never thought anything if it because it made sense with just a passing explanation.
Muslims: the whole Quran can be traced back to the prophet orally and in writing Majoosi Imam (murrah?) worshippers: idiut, the original Quran has 17000 verses which is somewhere in a cave with the taqiyyah mahdi 😡
They don’t even know their own scriptures lol, believing in something rewritten and has things added that are completely made up. How can someone that has false knowledge of their own book tell us about ours 🤣
I saw the Messenger of Allah sucking the saliva of Hassan and Hussein as a man sucks the date.Ibn Asaker | Source: History of Damascus Page or number: 13/223 | Summary of the updated: Sahih Imam Abu Hanifah "it is permissible to penetrate the mahrams (mothers, sister, daughter etc.) after wrapping silk around the Penis.”The Shafi’i and the Maliki schools consider a man's marrying his daughter born of fornication as permissible and so also marrying his sister, his son's daughter, his daughter's daughter, his brother's daughter, and his sister's daughter, because she is legally a stranger to him and because the law of inheritance does not apply between them, nor the law of maintenance. (al-Mughni. vol. 6, the chapter on marriage)
Sola Scriptura Yes because that was his grandson. The story comes from when they were in the desert and the Prophet (PBUH) asked for water but water was very scarce so he shared saliva with his grandchild. “The Prophet gave Hasan and Hussein his tongue and he moistened it as they were crying from thirst, then they calmed down.” Source: Kitāb al-Shifā 1/326 They were in harsh conditions and needed to survive in the desert, would you mock someone that’s dying of starvation if they ate from the dirt? That wrapping of silk bullshit you talk of is in Shia faith, it has nothing to do with Islam. I can’t even marry two sisters from the same family because they’re related so what makes you think we can have sexual intercourse with our own mahram women? The things these filthy perverts come up with to discredit Islam 🤦🏽♂️ This guy really tried to make the Prophet (PBUH) seem gross because he shared saliva in a desperate situation in the desert with his grandchildren, you’d have to be a pervert to twist such a situation. If someone was dying of thirst and drank their own urine, this guy would say they sucked themselves off, fucking weirdo. May Allah guide you, and if he doesn’t then I hope he punishes you severely for mocking the Prophet (PBUH).
Here are some of the differences: Quran 2:125 Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take) Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken) Quran 2:140 Hafs: taquluna (You say) Warsh: yaquluna (They say) Quran 2:184 Hafs: miskeenin (poor person Warsh: masakeena (poor people) Quran 3:146 Hafs: qatala (fought) Warsh: qutila (was killed) Quran 40:26 Hafs: aw an (or that) Warsh: wa an (and that) Quran 43:19 Hafs: ibaad (slaves) Warsh: inda (with)
@A.S It’s preserved because Hafs and Warsh are both authentic, the variations were all variations the Prophet (PBUH) taught. It’s not like the Bible where we don't know which parts are authentic and which aren't, and none of them are contradictory but simply add more of Allah's wisdom, unlike the Bible. Did you watch the video?
I’m from qays tribe and I didn’t know that my tribe back at those days was reciting sirat in that manner wow 😯 barakallah fik brother for the good videos you are doing to spread knowledge among the ummah
Sage of Synergism it isn’t different words. Lol the first Quran sorry to inform you but it’s not the Bible. Do you sit in your mum’s basement all day long. Being utterly useless because it seems like it.
@Sage of Synergism the qiraat caused problems among non arab muslims. So a standard one was issued to everyone. Also the early muslims knew about the qiraat so that just throws your argument down the water
@@lola7007 oh really? let's read zechariah 12,:10, Isaiah 49-53, Daniel 9 and Psalm 22 together then. Want to guess what it's about? Let's see what we figure out.
" *I swear by the positions of the stars* -and this is indeed a mighty oath, if only you knew - *that this indeed is a noble Qur'an* , inscribed in a *well-guarded Book* " - Surah Waqiya: 75-78 Jajhakallah Khayer dear brother to put light in this matter of reciting techniques to strengthen the Imaan of weak hearted Brothers & Sisters in Deen
Here are some of the differences: Quran 2:125 Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take) Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken) Quran 2:140 Hafs: taquluna (You say) Warsh: yaquluna (They say) Quran 2:184 Hafs: miskeenin (poor person Warsh: masakeena (poor people) Quran 3:146 Hafs: qatala (fought) Warsh: qutila (was killed) Quran 40:26 Hafs: aw an (or that) Warsh: wa an (and that) Quran 43:19 Hafs: ibaad (slaves) Warsh: inda (with)
@Anon Ymous you are a liar The hadith says: Az-Zuhri said: ‘Urwah told me, from ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), that she said: … the revelation ceased for a while, for so long that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) became sad. According to the reports that have reached us, he was so sad that on several occasions he wanted to throw himself from the top of high mountains, but every time he went to the top of a mountain in order to throw himself down from it, Jibreel appeared to him and said: O Muhammad, you are truly the Messenger of Allah. And he would calm down as a result and feel at ease, and he would go back. When the revelation had ceased for a long time, he would do the same thing again, and when he reached a mountaintop, Jibreel would appear to him and say the same thing to him. This additional material (which speaks of the cessation of revelation and the Prophet’s contemplating suicide) is not the words of ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her). Rather these are the words of az-Zuhri, who was one of the Taabi‘een and was not contemporary to that event. He did not state that any of the Sahaabah told him that; therefore when he stated that in the report, he prefaced it with the words, “According to the reports that have reached us.” Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Moreover, the one who said “According to the reports that have reached us” is az-Zuhri. What these words mean is: one of the things that we heard about the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is this story. It is one of the stories that az-Zuhri heard, and it is not mawsool (i.e., it has no connected chain of narration between him and the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)). Al-Karmaani said: This is what appears to be the case. Fath al-Baari (12/359). Abu Shaamah al-Maqdisi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: These are the words of az-Zuhri or someone else, and not ‘Aa’ishah. And Allah knows best. That is because he said “According to the reports that have reached us”, and ‘Aa’ishah did not say any such thing a concerning this matter. Sharh al-Hadith al-Muqtafa fi Mab‘ath an-Nabi al-Mustafa (p. 177). Thirdly: The reports of az-Zuhri in which he says “According to the reports that have reached us” are not acceptable, because their chains of narration are interrupted from the beginning. Hence they are like mu‘allaq reports [mu‘allaq, lit. “hanging”; a report in which one or more narrators is/are omitted from the beginning of the chain]. The fact that such stories or mu‘allaq reports are mentioned in the book of Imam al-Bukhaari does not mean that they are saheeh (sound) in his view, or that it can be said of them “it was narrated by al-Bukhaari”, because the report of which that may be said is the report that he narrated with a complete isnad (chain of narration). Shaykh al-Albaani (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Attributing it to al-Bukhaari [by saying “it was narrated by al-Bukhaari”, as if it were a saheeh hadith] is a serious mistake, because it gives the impression that this story of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) wanting to throw himself down from a mountaintop is saheeh according to the conditions set by al-Bukhaari. But that is not the case; rather al-Bukhaari mentioned this at the end of the hadith of ‘Aa’ishah about the beginning of revelation… [and he quoted the report mentioned above]. This additional material was also narrated by Ahmad (6/232-233); Abu Na‘eem in ad-Dalaa’il (p. 68-69); al-Bayhaqi in ad-Dalaa’il (1/393-395) via ‘Abd ar-Razzaaq from Ma‘mar. Via this isnad it was also narrated by Muslim (1/98), but he did not narrate the same wording; rather he narrated the version of Yoonus from Ibn Shihaab, which does not contain this additional material. It was also narrated by Muslim and Ahmad (6/223) via ‘Aqeel ibn Khaalid that Ibn Shihaab said … without this additional material. It was also narrated by al-Bukhaari at the beginning of as-Saheeh from ‘Aqeel. Keep making accusations and i will keep destroying you🤡
Wait, I have no idea what your talking about since I’m a new convert and I’m still trying to memorise the prayers, but are there genuinely people who think the sahabah forgot how to recite Al Fatiha? _The Sahabah_ ? Forgetting how to recite *_Al Fatiha_* ? After reciting it for a bare minimum of 17 times a day everyday for over a decade? That’s literally impossible.
@@masterpupil1132 you would never get the true meaning encompassed in another language than the original, as as they say, meaning is lost in translation
Jazakallahukhairan for making a video about this topic. You explained the relation between the ahruf and qira'a really well mashallah. I had some confusion prior to seeing this.
Here are some of the differences: Quran 2:125 Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take) Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken) Quran 2:140 Hafs: taquluna (You say) Warsh: yaquluna (They say) Quran 2:184 Hafs: miskeenin (poor person Warsh: masakeena (poor people) Quran 3:146 Hafs: qatala (fought) Warsh: qutila (was killed) Quran 40:26 Hafs: aw an (or that) Warsh: wa an (and that) Quran 43:19 Hafs: ibaad (slaves) Warsh: inda (with)
These people who could not even preserve one Bible in its original form.. Not even the original message of it want to insult Muslims for preserving Quran's different(all divinly accepted) recitations 😕🙄
@Anon Ymous Sahih Muslim 4194? At first read *Saheeh Bukhari* Volume 8, Book 82, Number 816: Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: 'Umar said, "I am afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, "We do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy Book," and consequently they may go astray by leaving an obligation that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm that the penalty of Rajam be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual intercourse, if he is already married and the crime is proved by witnesses or pregnancy or confession." Sufyan added, "I have memorized this narration in this way." 'Umar added, "Surely Allah's Apostle carried out the penalty of Rajam, and so did we after him." *Saheeh Muslim* Book 017, Number 4194: 'Abdullah b. 'Abbas reported that 'Umar b. Khattab sat on the pulpit of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: Verily Allah sent Muhammad (may peace be upon him) with truth and He sent down the Book upon him, and the verse of stoning was included in what was sent down to him. We recited it, retained it in our memory and understood it. Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) awarded the punishment of stoning to death (to the married adulterer and adulteress) and, after him, we also awarded the punishment of stoning, I am afraid that with the lapse of time, the people (may forget it) and may say: We do not find the punishment of stoning in the Book of Allah, and thus go astray by abandoning this duty prescribed by Allah. Stoning is a duty laid down in Allah's Book for married men and women who commit adultery when proof is established, or it there is pregnancy, or a confession. Christian missionaries tend to argue that this verse was removed from the Quran and they claim that this is proof that Muslims corrupted the Quran. Let's see if this argument holds any water. The alleged verse is... الشيخ والشيخة إذا زنيا فارجموهما البتة The old man and the old lady if they committed adultery then stone them Another opinion is that it is... الشيخ والشيخة إذا زنيا فارجموهما البتة نكالا من الله والله عزيز حكيم The old man and the old lady if they committed adultery then stone them as a punishment from Allah and Allah is the Most Mighty, Most Wise Imam ibn Hajar Al Asqalani says in his commentary on Saheeh Bukhari... فقال عمر : لما نزلت أتيت النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فقلت أكتبها ؟ فكأنه كره ذلك , فقال عمر : ألا ترى أن الشيخ إذا زنى ولم يحصن جلد , وأن الشاب إذا زنى وقد أحصن رجم Umar said: "When this verse came down I approached the Prophet peace be upon him so I asked him: Should I write it down?' It is as if he hated that" Then Umar said: "Cant you see that if the old man if he commits adultery he does not get the whip, and that if the young man if he commits adultery he gets stoned?" (Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani, Fathul Bari, Kitab: Al Hudood, Bab: Al I'tiraaf bil Zina, Commentary on Hadith no. 6327, Source) Here we clearly see that the Prophet (peace be upon him) did not want the verse to be written down because it was never meant to be part of the text of the Quran. The scholars of Islam are unanimous that the recitation of this verse has been abrogated but its ruling still remains in effect. However, the only reason why Umar got emotional and wanted to put the verse in the Quran was because he was afraid that one day people would think that its ruling had been cancelled. However, the companions did not allow him to because they all knew that its recitation had been abrogated. In order to put a verse in the Quran there needed to be two witnesses and Umar was all by himself. Umar himself knew that its recitation was abrogated but he was getting emotional, for he feared that people in the future would not believe in the ruling of stoning the adulterers. Imam ibn Hajar Al Asqalani has in his commentary... أي في الآية المذكورة التي نسخت تلاوتها وبقي حكمها , وقد وقع ما خشيه عمر أيضا فأنكر الرجم طائفة من الخوارج أو معظمهم وبعض المعتزلة In the verse whose recitation has been abrogated but its ruling remained, and it has happened what Umar feared. A tribe from the Khawarij or most of them and some of the Mu'tazilites rejected the stoning. وقد أخرج عبد الرزاق والطبري من وجه آخر عن ابن عباس أن عمر قال " سيجيء قوم يكذبون بالرجم " And it was reported by Abd al Razzaq and Al Tabari from another view that Ibn Abbas said that Umar said "There will come a people that will lie (or disbelieve) in the stoning" (Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani, Fathul Bari, Kitab: Al Hudood, Bab: Rajam Al Hublah min Zana Eezha Ahsanat, Commentary on Hadith no. 6328, Source) Imam Nawawi says in his commentary in Saheeh Muslim... وهذا مما نسخ لفظه وبقي حكمه And this is whose recitation has been abrogated and its ruling remained. وفي ترك الصحابة كتابة هذه الآية دلالة ظاهرة أن المنسوخ لا يكتب في المصحف , وفي إعلان عمر بالرجم وهو على المنبر وسكوت الصحابة وغيرهم من الحاضرين عن مخالفته بالإنكار دليل على ثبوت الرجم And the companions of the Prophet abandoning the writing of this verse is clear evidence that the abrogated should not be written in the Quran and that Umar's statement about the stoning as he is on the pulpit and the silence of the companions and other than them from who were present from opposing him is evidence about the ruling of the stoning (still being implemented) (Imam Nawawi, Sharh Saheeh Muslim, Kitab: Al Hudood, Bab: Rajam Al Thayb fil Zina, Commentary on Hadith no. 3201, Source) Al Sindi says in his commentary on Sunan Ibn Majah... أي آية الرجم وهذه الآية مما نسخ لفظها وبقي حكمها The verse of stoning: Its recitation has been abrogated and its ruling still remains in effect. (Al Sindi, Sharh Sunan Ibn Majah, Kitab: Al Hudood, Bab: Al Rajam, Commentary on Hadith no. 2543, Source) Muhammad Shams al-Haqq al-Adhim Abadi says in his commentary on Sunan Abu Dawud... وهذا مما نسخ لفظه وبقي حكمه And this is whose recitation has been abrogated but ruling remains in effect. (Muhammad Shams al-Haqq al-Adhim Abadi, Awn al-Mabud Sharh Sunan Abu Dawud, Kitab: Al Hudood, Bab: Fil Rajam, Commentary on Hadith no. 3835, Source) Conclusion We can clearly see that there was a consensus amongst the companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the scholars that the recitation of the verse on stoning was abrogated and that they did not corrupt it. How can all the companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) who sacrificed everything they had for this religion just happen to decide to come together and purposely corrupt the Quran by removing this verse? What motive would they have in doing so if its law was to remain being implemented? So there can't be a motive to remove this verse simply because they wished to not follow its ruling since the ruling still remains in effect up to this day. So clearly the evidence shows that this recitation was always meant to be abrogated while its ruling remains in effect.
@Anon Ymous of course they will deny their existence. They are trying to go back 2 to 4000 years of leople of whose language and exact location is unknown based on the bible that is fiction lol.
The Qur’an is equally as eloquent in all of those different modes and Qira’at. If this isn’t a proof that they were intentional, I don’t know what is 🤷🏻♂️
I mean one of the biggest miracles of the text of Qur'an is that has perfect ring formations in its ahzab, parts, chapters...even ayat Al Kursi has it. I suggest u to search for it on YT or Google
@@LordYamcha666 I saw the Messenger of Allah sucking the saliva of Hassan and Hussein as a man sucks the date.Ibn Asaker | Source: History of Damascus Page or number: 13/223 | Summary of the updated: Sahih Imam Abu Hanifah "it is permissible to penetrate the mahrams (mothers, sister, daughter etc.) after wrapping silk around the Penis.”The Shafi’i and the Maliki schools consider a man's marrying his daughter born of fornication as permissible and so also marrying his sister, his son's daughter, his daughter's daughter, his brother's daughter, and his sister's daughter, because she is legally a stranger to him and because the law of inheritance does not apply between them, nor the law of maintenance. (al-Mughni. vol. 6, the chapter on marriage)
@@salafichristiansubordinati6496 The last part is a fabrication. Neither Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Maliki, Imam Shafi`i or Imam Ibn Hanbal ever permitted incest. It goes against the Qur'an so how can you believe in these obvious fabrications?
Even in English the text is incredibly intelligent and eloquent :-) Surah 24:61: It is no restriction upon the blind, and it is no restriction upon the lame, and it is no restriction upon the sick, nor upon yourselves, that you eat from your houses, or from your fathers' houses, or your mothers' houses, or your brother's houses, or your sisters' houses, or the houses of your paternal uncles, or the houses of your paternal aunts, or the houses of your maternal uncles, or the houses of your maternal aunts, or that of which you possess the keys, or of your friend. It is no fault in you that you eat all together or in diverse groups.
Jazakallah brother You have introduced this topic in a very clear way. I am inspired to dig deeper. I have avoided this knowledge because I felt I haven’t memorized the Quran so I shouldn’t focus on it , but now I’m thinking that was not wise as I have remained ignorant for years on the topic
So the answer is that all the variations are authentic and the lost surahs (eaten by a sheep etc.) are abrogated? Isn't that logic somehow going into the wrong direction?
@@hans471 Iam 2 years late but still, that verses where for certain times, so when the certain time for the verse passed and no more was needed the verse was totally erased from the face of the earth by Allah SWT, go search in every place you will not find any word of the verses for certain times
Because of all this noise those Christian polemics made around 30 Qur'an's and such I went down some rabbit holes, and now alhamdulillah i am learning the 10 qira'at and it's the best thing that happened to me in a long time! Did not know I could fall more in love with the Qur'an.
Here are some of the differences: Quran 2:125 Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take) Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken) Quran 2:140 Hafs: taquluna (You say) Warsh: yaquluna (They say) Quran 2:184 Hafs: miskeenin (poor person Warsh: masakeena (poor people) Quran 3:146 Hafs: qatala (fought) Warsh: qutila (was killed) Quran 40:26 Hafs: aw an (or that) Warsh: wa an (and that) Quran 43:19 Hafs: ibaad (slaves) Warsh: inda (with)
@@a.s2205 All of them give the same contextual meaning with reference to the text. Isn't it beautiful? MashAllah. Plus, there's a Hadith which confirms the ahqaf so i don't understand what you're whining about.
@@a.s2205 "And they have taken from the standing place of Abraham a place of player." "And you shall take from the standing place of Abraham a place of player." Put these in the verse, each gives the same meaning. Just first, third person pov difference. They/ you is used to address the believers. The Quran I'd direct addressing the prophet and indirectly addressing the believers in the hafs version whereas you'll find the opposite in the warsh. Each is fulfilled, they have/ you shall take a place of player.
Jazakallah Brother Farid. Your videos have been very informative and have cleared a lot of doubts I once had. Thank you very much and may Allah bless you
Here are some of the differences: Quran 2:125 Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take) Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken) Quran 2:140 Hafs: taquluna (You say) Warsh: yaquluna (They say) Quran 2:184 Hafs: miskeenin (poor person Warsh: masakeena (poor people) Quran 3:146 Hafs: qatala (fought) Warsh: qutila (was killed) Quran 40:26 Hafs: aw an (or that) Warsh: wa an (and that) Quran 43:19 Hafs: ibaad (slaves) Warsh: inda (with)
Maasya Allah tabarakallah, that's how we muslim inform them to the truth of islam..it's our duty to do dawah even their heart deny it. Insyaa Allah hidayah come to their hearts so disbelief turning to belief in islam..as simple as that. Alhamdulillah we have brother Farid in youtube🙏
Jazakallah br. Farid. Faith is a blessing of Allah Subhanhutalah. Born Muslims are gifted this masha-Allah, converts should regard it more, murtads should rediscover it, embrace it and appreciate it.
Christian Apologists/Missionaries: Quran has been changed over and over again. Also Christian Apologists/Missionaries: *believes the bible to be free from tahreef*
Farid Responds my dear brother you are a gem amongst gems. I shall in Sha Allah take the banner of defending Islam from the angle of Scientific Miracles. Everyone must have a specialty in a specific field. Wish I could contact you.
@Sage of Synergism *Scientific mistakes in bible* *Bible confirms flat earth!* Matthew 4:8 says, “Once again, the devil took him to a very high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world [cosmos] in their glory.” Obviously, this would be possible only if the earth were flat. Disregarding the dome, the essential flatness of the earth's surface is required by verses like Daniel 4:10-11. In Daniel, the king “saw a tree of great height at the centre of the earth...reaching with its top to the sky and visible to the earth's farthest bounds.” If the earth were flat, a sufficiently tall tree would be visible to “the earth's farthest bounds,” but this is impossible on a spherical earth. *Bible says earth has four corners:* "He will set up a banner for the nations, And will assemble the outcasts of Israel, And gather together the dispersed of Judah From the four corners of the earth."(Isaiah 11:12) "After these things I saw four angels standing at the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, on the sea, or on any tree."(Revelation 7:1) “Have you ever given orders to the morning,or shown the dawn its place,that it might take the earth by the edgesand shake the wicked out of it?The earth takes shape like clay under a seal;its features stand out like those of a garment.(Job 38:12-14) *Bible says earth is fixed* "tremble before him, all the earth! The earth is set firmly in place and cannot be moved."( 1 Chronicles 16:30) "The LORD is king. He is clothed with majesty and strength. The earth is set firmly in place and cannot be moved."(psalm 93:1) Say to all the nations, "The LORD is king! The earth is set firmly in place and cannot be moved; he will judge the peoples with justice."(Psalm 96:10) You who laid the foundations of the earth, So that it should not be moved forever,(Psalm 104:5) *Using blood to purify house!* Leviticus 14:51 "Then he is to take the cedar wood, the hyssop, the scarlet yarn and the live bird, dip them into the blood of the dead bird and the fresh water, and sprinkle the house seven times."
@Sage of Synergism - Qur’an 3:35 onwards... (paraphrased) A pregnant woman from the family of Imran dedicates her unborn to God's service in the Temple thinking it would be a boy. When Mary was born, she was looked after by Zakariyya in the Temple at Jerusalem & later on, it was here that Archangel Gabriel announced to her that she will give birth to Jesus (as). IMPORTANT NOTE : make note of the fact that whenever the Qur’an mentions Maryam (Mary the mum of Jesus /Isa) peace be upon them: - She is in the Temple at Jerusalem. - Her mother is not alive. - She has no brothers named Moses or Aaron. - Her son is clearly named 'Jesus SON OF MARY' who came to correct the teachings of Moses (pbut) who came many centuries earlier. - and Mary is mentioned by name so many times & is referred to as 'Chosen over all other women'. It is necessary to know all this so that one doesn't get confused when Mary is called "Oh sister of Aaron.. " by her ppl to remind her of her Priestly status in the Temple. She was, in effect, a Priestess living in the Temple. Disbelievers say the Qur’an is wrong & got Mary mixed up with Miriam who was the older sister of Moses & Aaron (pbut). Note that the Qur’an never names this Miriam but only mentions her story briefly: - She is in Egypt - She follows her baby brother, Moses, in his basket on the Nile River. - She informs Pharaoh's wife about somebody that can suckle the crying baby. - Miriam's MOTHER is called on by Pharaoh's wife to suckle baby Moses. So all this proves that the 2 characters (Mary & Miriam) are different in the Qur’an with totally different stories.
Much needed bro. People talk in terminologies,but nobody talk with examples, you just went ahead and did a demo. Would be great if we had links of entire recitation of the quran in each of the qiraat
I seek refuge in Allah against the accursed satan And to recite the Qur'an." And whoever is guided is only guided for [the benefit of] himself; and whoever strays - say, "I am only [one] of the warners." (92) [Qur'an Chapter An-Naml, The Ants]
Farid: Early Scholars, Big Scholars of Islam says this and this about the Qirat and therefore this is not a mistake. Enemies of Islam: No no no, this famous "celebrity scholar" said this and that, so Qur'an is not preserved.
David Wood: Your Koran has changes. Farid: Nope. There were different Qira'at, all correct. David Wood: So there were different Korans according to "the Origin of the Koran." Muslims: ????
@Sage of Synergism give me a narration says A verse was lost , hafs it's just a type of Qira'a (recitation) , Quran couldn't be changed because it is preserved and memorized in our hearts, So you Islam Haters Inventing lies Without proofs to Attack Islam and you Forget Your corrupted book !!!! Please show Me a single Sentence from your manuscripts at the time of Jesus pbuh I dare you and Apologize me for my engliszzhhh
@Sage of Synergism Musnan Ahmad 21245 is a “Dawi'f hadith." “Dawi'f" means false. You can't truly prove anything. That's why always targeting unauthentic source. 👇 a- The narration is reported from Ubayy through narrators who are doubtful, other then the fact that just after Ubayy (RA) there is only one narrator. Many scholars, both classical and recent, have termed its chains as weak. b- The narration contains a real time error for it ascribes a place to alleged verse on stoning whereas the Prophet (PBUH) did not allow it to be written which logically entails he did not specify its place. Also there is no evidence of Prophet (PBUH) reciting it that might have specified its position. This point weakens the position of the scholars who authenticated the narration. c- Even if we accept the narration, then it simply means the verses were abrogated. d- Ubayy (RA) himself was the member of the committee standardizing the text, but he did not make any bid to get the alleged verse he remembered into the text. Verily the Qur’an stays above all doubt in its preservation. An Italian orientalist Laura Veccia Vaglieri rightly said; "But there is another proof of the Divinity of the Qur’an; it is the fact that it has been preserved intact through the ages since the time of its Revelation till the present day." (Apologia dell’ Islamismo, translated by Dr. Aldo Caselli under the title An Interpretation of Islam p.57 Muslim Book Mark, 2004)
According to hadith حَدِيث literature, the Quran is revealed in seven Ahruf أَحْرُف (the plural of harf حَرْف). Ahruf are distinct from Qira'at قِرَاءَات. Malik Ibn Anas reported that the second Rashidun Caliph Umar Ibn al-Khattab said: "I heard Hisham Ibn Hakim Ibn Hizam reading Surat Al-Furqan in a different way from the one I used to read it, and the Prophet himself had read out this surah to me. Consequently, as soon as I heard him, I wanted to get hold of him. However, I gave him respite until he had finished the prayer. Then I got hold of his cloak and dragged him to the Prophet. I said to him: “I have heard this person [Hisham Ibn Hakim Ibn Hizam] reading Surah Al Furqan in a different way from the one you had read it out to me.” The Prophet said: “Leave him alone [O ‘Umar].” Then he said to Hashim: “Read [it].” [Umar said:] “He read it out in the same way as he had done before me.” [At this,] the Prophet said: “It was revealed thus.” Then the Prophet asked me to read it out. So I read it out. [At this], he said: “It was revealed thus; this Quran has been revealed in seven Ahruf. You can read it in any of them you find easy from among them."[1]
FABULOUS. The points i most enjoyed were the diagram showing how qiraaf link to ahruf, and the very persuasive common sense argument about how if it was due to mistakes then fatiha would be free of them,
I am from shafi school of thought and we have total 42 rakah which includes fard and sunnah. How the heck can someone mess up even after reciting something 42 times a day? And the hanafis according to me have more than this. Plus the additional salat of tahhajud, after the fajr salah before the zohr salah, etc. How the hell can someone mess up? Allahumdulliah for ISLAM.
Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: كُنْ وَرِعًا تَكُنْ أَعْبَدَ النَّاسِ وَكُنْ قَنِعًا تَكُنْ أَشْكَرَ النَّاسِ وَأَحِبَّ لِلنَّاسِ مَا تُحِبُّ لِنَفْسِكَ تَكُنْ مُؤْمِنًا وَأَحْسِنْ جِوَارَ مَنْ جَاوَرَكَ تَكُنْ مُسْلِمًا وَأَقِلَّ الضَّحِكَ فَإِنَّ كَثْرَةَ الضَّحِكِ تُمِيتُ الْقَلْبَ Be devout and you will be the most pious of people. Be content and you will be the most grateful of people. Love for people what you love for yourself and you will be a believer. Behave well with your neighbors and you will be a Muslim. Laugh less, for excessive laughter will deaden the heart. Source: Sunan Ibn Mājah 4217, Source: Sahih
I saw the Messenger of Allah sucking the saliva of Hassan and Hussein as a man sucks the date.Ibn Asaker | Source: History of Damascus Page or number: 13/223 | Summary of the updated: Sahih Imam Abu Hanifah "it is permissible to penetrate the mahrams (mothers, sister, daughter etc.) after wrapping silk around the Penis.”The Shafi’i and the Maliki schools consider a man's marrying his daughter born of fornication as permissible and so also marrying his sister, his son's daughter, his daughter's daughter, his brother's daughter, and his sister's daughter, because she is legally a stranger to him and because the law of inheritance does not apply between them, nor the law of maintenance. (al-Mughni. vol. 6, the chapter on marriage)
@@salafichristiansubordinati6496 Peace, I seek refuge in Allah against the accursed satan In the name of Allah most beneficent most merciful Say, "He is Allah, [who is] One, (1) Allah, the Eternal Refuge. (2) He neither begets nor is born, (3) Nor is there to Him any equivalent." (4) [Qur'an Chapter Al-Ikhlas, Sincreity of Faith]
@@salafichristiansubordinati6496 Peace, I seek refuge in Allah against the accursed satan And of His signs are the night and day and the sun and moon. Do not prostrate to the sun or to the moon, but prostate to Allah, who created them, if it should be Him that you worship. (37) But if they are arrogant - then those who are near your Lord exalt Him by night and by day, and they do not become weary. (38) [Qur'an Chapter Fussilat, Detailed Signs]
Here are some of the differences: Quran 2:125 Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take) Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken) Quran 2:140 Hafs: taquluna (You say) Warsh: yaquluna (They say) Quran 2:184 Hafs: miskeenin (poor person Warsh: masakeena (poor people) Quran 3:146 Hafs: qatala (fought) Warsh: qutila (was killed) Quran 40:26 Hafs: aw an (or that) Warsh: wa an (and that) Quran 43:19 Hafs: ibaad (slaves) Warsh: inda (with)
5:00 add to that khlaf al'shir خلف العاشر recite مالك in his qir'a قراءة but in his narration from Hamza خلف عن حمزة recites it as ملك the same person transmitted it in both ways.
Great thank you.. I'm Muslim but not arabic daily spoken nation. Your simple but informative and sincere video answered most of my question about arabic dialect and why it was written that way in Quran. In My small country we have more that 60 dialect. One same word could be has different meaning on other dialects. Tq sir.
Idk why any muslim would take those jokers seriously Who claims completely accepted different qirats as corruption But maybe it is mainly because us not properly learning our deen sadly
Ignorant Muslims that aren't aware of these things. Some young Muslims (especially those living in the West) are extremely ignorant of their own religion almost got he point that they don't truly understand It's Essence. May Allâh help them.
@@forgiven196 what's is the problem here? Prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h recited in both ways. So there is nothing wrong in it. Since your claim was that quran was changed(after the death of prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h). Please watch the video first.
السلام عليكم May Allah reward you . In the future it may be beneficial to make a video about the Isnads , showing the sanad of each Qiraat and how each reaches the level of tawattur i.e mass transmission on each level. We often hear this but to see it and understand destroys many arguments and misunderstandings. جزاك الله خيرا
These books about the religion Hadith Tafsir Fiqh Jarh and ta'deel And the likes of Islamic books in the original language Basically they are direct physical sources Better than websites I saw these websites sometimes messing up translations and inserting incomplete quotes that created misunderstandings leading to arguments against Islam 😂🤦♂️ Also sometimes false grading of hadith It is rare though You will need to learn Arabic for these books 😅
Excellent video brother. So interesting that "hum" is the Qureysh dialect. I was told the "hum" is adjusted when with a Jaar to "him" but it looks like the default "hum" would also be correct.
@Sage of Synergism Where does this say the verses were "lost" LMAO. There's something called abrogation, which you obviously dont know because instead of actually studying Islam you watch too much David Wood, keep living in your bubble, millions and millions of Muslims throughout history have memorized and preserved the Qur'an, I know it hurts you christians really badly, now get lost. PS: That particular hadith seems to be weak but there's nothing unique about it as there are other hadith which are authentic and mention verses which arent in the Qur'an anymore, its very normal, verses get abrogated and they are not included in the Qur'an anymore.
Jazak Allahu khairan to people of those channel you are very informative May Allah reward you for your niyyah and your efforts. May Allah help to continue your work
@Mohamed Ismail oh no, Yasir Qadhi lol. This dude himself don't believe Quran to be preserved. The 2nd book you recommended i already talked about it> =]
Here are some of the differences: Quran 2:125 Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take) Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken) Quran 2:140 Hafs: taquluna (You say) Warsh: yaquluna (They say) Quran 2:184 Hafs: miskeenin (poor person Warsh: masakeena (poor people) Quran 3:146 Hafs: qatala (fought) Warsh: qutila (was killed) Quran 40:26 Hafs: aw an (or that) Warsh: wa an (and that) Quran 43:19 Hafs: ibaad (slaves) Warsh: inda (with)
@FARID RESPONDS Jazaak'Allahu khayran, akhi Farid, for this explanation. Why don't you make a video clarifying and correcting Shabir Ali in his latest video The Sanaa Manuscript : was the Qur'an preserved accurately ? Even though he says that the Qur'an we have today is a GENUINE REPRESENTATION of the revelation sent down to the Prophet (asws), he fails to mention that the 'different wordings' were only the 7 different dialects and not the OWN WORDS, OWN REPHRASING of the sahaba as he claims. His words are somehow misleading to the ignorant and to the hateful alike. Btw, I was really disappointed to have missed your interview by brother Sajid Lipham, because I didn't receive any notification for it ! ☹️☹️☹️
Really appreciate this video. So many non arabic speaking muslims are oblivious to these matters. That’s where the haters find their chance to deceive them
Official written copy by Uthman The Quran was originally revealed in Quraishi dialect of Arabic. But to facilitate the people who speak other dialects, in their understanding and comprehension, Allah revealed the Quran finally in seven dialects of Arabic. During the period of Caliph Uthman (third successor to the Prophet) differences in reading the Quran among the various tribes became obvious, due to the various dialectical recitations. Dispute was arising, with each tribe calling its recitation as the correct one. This alarmed Uthman, who made an official copy in the Quraishi dialect, the dialect in which the Quran was revealed to the Prophet and was memorized by his companions. Thus this compilation by Uthman's Committee is not a different version of the Quran (like the Biblical versions) but the same original revelation given to the Prophet by One God, Allah. Narrated Anas bin Malik: Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham (Syria) and the people of Iraq were waging war to conquer Armenia and Azherbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their differences in the recitation of the Quran, so he said to Uthman, 'O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and Christians did before'. So Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, 'Send us the manuscripts of the Quran so that we may compile the Quranic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you'. Hafsa sent it to Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin Az-Zubair, Said bin Al-As and Abdur Rahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, 'In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Quran, then write it in their (Quraishi) tongue'. They did so, and when they had written many copies, Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied and ordered that all the other Quranic materials whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt…" [29] Again a very stringent criteria was set up by this Committee to prevent any alteration of the Revelation. 1. The earlier recension (Original copy prepared by Abu Bakr) was to serve as the principal basis of the new one. [30] 2. Any doubt that might be raised as to the phrasing of a particular passage in the written text was to be dispelled by summoning persons known to have learned the passage in question from the Prophet. [31] 3. Uthman himself was to supervise the work of the Council. [32] When the final recension was completed, Uthman sent a copy of it to each of the major cities of Makka, Damascus, Kufa, Basra and Madina. The action of Uthman to burn the other copies besides the final recension, though obviously drastic, was for the betterment and harmony of the whole community and was unanimously approved by the Companions of the Prophet. Zaid ibn Thabit is reported to have said: "I saw the Companions of Muhammad (going about) saying, 'By God, Uthman has done well! By God, Uthman has done well!" [33] Another esteemed Companion Musab ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas said: "I saw the people assemble in large number at Uthman's burning of the prescribed copies (of the Quran), and they were all pleased with his action; not a one spoke out against him". [34] Ali ibn Abu Talib, the cousin of the Prophet and the fourth successor to the Prophet commented: "If I were in command in place of Uthman, I would have done the same". [35] Of the copies made by Uthman, two still exist to our day. One is in the city of Tashkent, (Uzbekistan) and the second one is in Istanbul (Turkey). Below is a brief account of both these copies: 1. The copy which Uthman sent to Madina was reportedly removed by the Turkish authorities to Istanbul, from where it came to Berlin during World War I. The Treaty of Versailles, which concluded World War I, contains the following clause: 'Article 246: Within six months from the coming into force of the present Treaty, Germany will restore to His Majesty, King of Hedjaz, the original Koran of Caliph Othman, which was removed from Madina by the Turkish authorities and is stated to have been presented to the ex-Emperor William II". [36] 'This manuscript then reached Istanbul, but not Madina (Where it now resides)'. [37] 2. The second copy in existence is kept in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. 'It may be the Imam (master) manuscript or one of the other copies made at the time of Uthman'. [38] It Came to Samarkand in 890 Hijra (1485) and remained there till 1868. Then it was taken to St.Petersburg by the Russians in 1869. It remained there till 1917. A Russian orientalist gave a detailed description of it, saying that many pages were damaged and some were missing. A facsimile, some 50 copies, of this mushaf (copy) was produced by S.Pisareff in 1905. A copy was sent to the Ottoman Sultan 'Abdul Hamid, to the Shah of Iran, to the Amir of Bukhara, to Afghanistan, to Fas and some important Muslim personalities. One copy is now in the Columbia University Library (U.S.A.). [39] 'The Manuscript was afterwards returned to its former place and reached Tashkent in 1924, where it has remained since'. [40]
Sage of Synergism yhh and the pronunciation is of it is just a tad bit different. It’s like saying tomato and tomahto. Get life seriously coming to all these Islamic channels. Are people so useless these days. Maybe try and read your own scripture. Oh I forgot you can’t. Do you even know the Arabic language to make a judgement.
Ubayy b. Ka'b reported that the Messenger of Allah ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) was near the tank of Banu Ghifar that Gabriel came to him and said: Allah has commanded you to recite to your people the Qur'an in one dialect. Upon this he said: I ask from Allah pardon and forgiveness. My people are not capable of doing it. He then came for the second time and said: Allah has commanded you that you should recite the Qur'an to your people in two dialects. Upon this he (the Holy prophet) again said: I seek pardon and forgiveness from Allah, my people would not be able to do so. He (Gabriel) came for the third time and said: Allah has commanded you to recite the Qur'an to your people in three dialects. Upon this he said: I ask pardon and forgiveness from Allah. My people would not be able to do it. He then came to him for the fourth time and said: Allah has commanded you to recite the Qur'an to your people in seven dialects, and in whichever dialect they would recite, they would be right. sahih muslim 1906
![Muslim Scholars Hiding Different Quran?! Surat al-Layl [Response to David Wood]](/img/n.gif)
This is why Muslims we should be mastering the Arabic language for the love for the Quran, it is a defence and the master key for our religion. If us Muslims didn’t stray away from the Arabic language then many anti Islamist that come up with dumb conclusions and idiotic assumptions will be afraid, cautious and even embarrassed to discuss anything related to Islam.
Wlh you r right
Mohamed *my last name is Ibrahim’s son* Its really very simple the difference between the bible and the Quran. The evil actions of men/women are documented in the bible (even from those who believe) However nowhere does God instruct people to do evil and detestable things, do you see jesus doing any detestable thing? No. But you do see madmuham doing many of these things. The issue and reason Islam will never succeed is you muslims claim Muhammad lived the perfect life and you should live as he did.
Ninja FEESE and why would i not, when i have read it with my own eyes and anyone who has eyes can.
Like i said, islams problem is that it claims Muhammad lived a perfect life which he clearly lived the opposite as shown above
Ninja FEESE Evil + funny verses in the quran
Muhammad had sex with a 9 year old girl, called aisha who he married when she was 6
If a married women owns a business and a man works for her, she should let him suck her nipples to act like he his her son and her his mother. So as to show her husband she is not sleeping with him
The Quran permits prububescent marriage and sex
Quran 65v4 and then
Sura 33v49 confirms this evil
Muhammad sucked on a boys tongue,
muslim says it was his grandson and his lips (apparently this makes it acceptable 😂)
Jesus said to fast in secret as to show god not others
Contradicts ramadan
Muhammad walked around covered in semen so his child bride had to scrap off the crust
He had his followers suck each others fingers
He allowed his followers to hire prostitutes
He took the wife of his own adopted son to the later abolish adoption to justify himself
He swore an oath saying he would stop having sex with his slave girl. Then has a revelation from allah saying he has to break that oath. (“Allah” encouraging lies)
Falsely talks about a trinity between mary, jesus and allah saying they are all gods
Muhammad himself said he was a victim of a magic spell which gave him false beliefs and revelations
Every islamic country was conquered through wars/forcing people to convert or else they would die
Muhammad road upon a unicorn to heaven one night randomly when he felt like it
Muhammad revealed if he was having a false revelations, allah would cut off his aorta - in sura 69 44-46 we hear Muhammad aorta is being cut off
According to ubai eben kall (master of the quran) sura 33 (most evil chapter in the koran) use to have as many verses as sura 2 (280) yet sura 3 only has 73verses
@Silver Prime what is it with you guys and your ignorant crap, you just sound desparate
Three Events We Won’t See In Our Lifetime:
1. Neptune orbiting the sun for the second time since its discovery in 1846 (2174)
2. The return of Halley’s Comet for the 3rd time since 2020 (2209)
*3. A Christian properly defending his religion (Never)*
🤣
@Denzo Dridz it's a stupid religion.
Bunch of nonsense about god dying for nothing.
@@ivonikolov2916 your gospels are corrupted and even Christian scholars admitted that, how do you want us to believe in it? How are you still believing in it? This is a joke😟
😂🤣👍
@@ivonikolov2916 🤔 at the same time u believe god was stripped n beaten and killed by his own creation n he was calling out to another God,n u r talking about weakness . U need some broom sticks to chew dude. This is ur siwak
Very good that different speakers are clarifying this issue at this specific moment.
Can you link them please?
its because some idiots latched onto Yasir Qadhi and try to prove the quran is not preserved.
@@thesmartpotato1854 TH-cam search "Adnan Rashid Qur'an preservation"
@@thesmartpotato1854 also see "Al madrasatu Al umariyya" they have a whole series being released over the past week about this topic
@@ahmedal-tayy7332
In which video did he allegedly say that ?
Christian claiming they are the one recognize the difference between Maalik and Malik? Haha.
And those two words do not differ much in meaning, because a king is also the owner of everything in his dominion.
Allah (swt) is BOTH
KING AND OWNER OF J.D.
I learned about this in a random Yusuf Estes lecture 15 years ago when I first became a Muslim. I never thought anything if it because it made sense with just a passing explanation.
Muslims: the whole Quran can be traced back to the prophet orally and in writing
Majoosi Imam (murrah?) worshippers: idiut, the original Quran has 17000 verses which is somewhere in a cave with the taqiyyah mahdi 😡
@@cowdyimammurrahtabari973 Imagine if Shi`as and Christians collaborated against Sunnis. It would be a circus.
Cowdy Imam Murrah Tabari isn’t this a Shia belief?
I like when a Christian come to Muslim comment section to teach us the Quran and Arabic language 😂
They don’t even know their own scriptures lol, believing in something rewritten and has things added that are completely made up. How can someone that has false knowledge of their own book tell us about ours 🤣
Yeah it's just like a cat teaching a bird to fly.
I saw the Messenger of Allah sucking the saliva of Hassan and Hussein as a man sucks the date.Ibn Asaker | Source: History of Damascus Page or number: 13/223 | Summary of the updated: Sahih
Imam Abu Hanifah "it is permissible to penetrate the mahrams (mothers, sister, daughter etc.) after wrapping silk around the Penis.”The Shafi’i and the Maliki schools consider a man's marrying his daughter born of fornication as permissible and so also marrying his sister, his son's daughter, his daughter's daughter, his brother's daughter, and his sister's daughter, because she is legally a stranger to him and because the law of inheritance does not apply between them, nor the law of maintenance. (al-Mughni. vol. 6, the chapter on marriage)
Sola Scriptura Yes because that was his grandson. The story comes from when they were in the desert and the Prophet (PBUH) asked for water but water was very scarce so he shared saliva with his grandchild.
“The Prophet gave Hasan and Hussein his tongue and he moistened it as they were crying from thirst, then they calmed down.”
Source: Kitāb al-Shifā 1/326
They were in harsh conditions and needed to survive in the desert, would you mock someone that’s dying of starvation if they ate from the dirt?
That wrapping of silk bullshit you talk of is in Shia faith, it has nothing to do with Islam. I can’t even marry two sisters from the same family because they’re related so what makes you think we can have sexual intercourse with our own mahram women? The things these filthy perverts come up with to discredit Islam 🤦🏽♂️
This guy really tried to make the Prophet (PBUH) seem gross because he shared saliva in a desperate situation in the desert with his grandchildren, you’d have to be a pervert to twist such a situation. If someone was dying of thirst and drank their own urine, this guy would say they sucked themselves off, fucking weirdo.
May Allah guide you, and if he doesn’t then I hope he punishes you severely for mocking the Prophet (PBUH).
Do we have A CHRISTIAN who knows ARABIC
I'm still waiting for Christians to show me a Qur'an with more or less then 114 chapters 🙃
Because we believe in all 114 Chapters (the complete Quran), They are still struggling and will never ever get it..May Allah guide us all
There are incomplete Manuscripts if that's what you mean.... but the Qur'an has always been complete and the same :)
@@Tech-WonDo I keep asking which Bible I should read the one with 66 73 78 or 81 books and I still haven't gotten a answer 😭
@Denzo Dridz I've seen the hadiths but it doesnt mean that Qur'an is incomplete or it's missing stuff...
@Anon YmousLiar
Our indian scholars has given each and every answer to these questions centuries ago
Alhumdulillah ...
who ? Share the link brother
Source?
Here are some of the differences:
Quran 2:125
Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take)
Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken)
Quran 2:140
Hafs: taquluna (You say)
Warsh: yaquluna (They say)
Quran 2:184
Hafs: miskeenin (poor person
Warsh: masakeena (poor people)
Quran 3:146
Hafs: qatala (fought)
Warsh: qutila (was killed)
Quran 40:26
Hafs: aw an (or that)
Warsh: wa an (and that)
Quran 43:19
Hafs: ibaad (slaves)
Warsh: inda (with)
Show me how it was preserved
@A.S It’s preserved because Hafs and Warsh are both authentic, the variations were all variations the Prophet (PBUH) taught. It’s not like the Bible where we don't know which parts are authentic and which aren't, and none of them are contradictory but simply add more of Allah's wisdom, unlike the Bible.
Did you watch the video?
I’m from qays tribe and I didn’t know that my tribe back at those days was reciting sirat in that manner wow 😯 barakallah fik brother for the good videos you are doing to spread knowledge among the ummah
I smell hard facts and clean logical thinking. Some people will not like this.
Mashallah, brother.
Sage of Synergism it isn’t different words. Lol the first Quran sorry to inform you but it’s not the Bible.
Do you sit in your mum’s basement all day long. Being utterly useless because it seems like it.
Sage of Synergism huh? Similar verse damn what waffle are you saying.
How does one not understand the word ABROGATION.
Sage of Synergism a Christian telling me about Qiraat when they can’t even read their own scripture.
@Sage of Synergism the qiraat caused problems among non arab muslims. So a standard one was issued to everyone. Also the early muslims knew about the qiraat so that just throws your argument down the water
@@lola7007 oh really? let's read zechariah 12,:10, Isaiah 49-53, Daniel 9 and Psalm 22 together then. Want to guess what it's about? Let's see what we figure out.
" *I swear by the positions of the stars* -and this is indeed a mighty oath, if only you knew - *that this indeed is a noble Qur'an* , inscribed in a *well-guarded Book* " - Surah Waqiya: 75-78
Jajhakallah Khayer dear brother to put light in this matter of reciting techniques to strengthen the Imaan of weak hearted Brothers & Sisters in Deen
I love warsh. Even tho I learn in Hafs, Warsh is a delight to recite
Here in Africa we recite warsh more. Even though people rewrite by their own hand
Me too but in my country we do hafs
Warsh is very melodic. Buy I like Soosi an abi Amr the most. It sounds very eloquent
Ben Dover I love listening to the warsh recitation
@abimbola chabi The differences do not change the message.
What an amazing video shaykh. I truely loved it. May Allah reward you for this!!
You mean milk shake lol
Here are some of the differences:
Quran 2:125
Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take)
Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken)
Quran 2:140
Hafs: taquluna (You say)
Warsh: yaquluna (They say)
Quran 2:184
Hafs: miskeenin (poor person
Warsh: masakeena (poor people)
Quran 3:146
Hafs: qatala (fought)
Warsh: qutila (was killed)
Quran 40:26
Hafs: aw an (or that)
Warsh: wa an (and that)
Quran 43:19
Hafs: ibaad (slaves)
Warsh: inda (with)
@@a.s2205 🤡🤡🤡
The West African recitation is amazing. Love it.
Is that Warsh?
Yes , Warsh is popular in North and West Africa .
Imagine believing in a psychopath who doesn't know what qiraat is...
Denzo Dridz Well there‘s a good chance he‘ll miss....
LOL nice name and comment
@Anon Ymous you made this claim 2 days ago and i destroyed you, but you keep repeating the same thing?
@Anon Ymous 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡 we need you in the circhs
@Anon Ymous you are a liar
The hadith says:
Az-Zuhri said: ‘Urwah told me, from ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), that she said: … the revelation ceased for a while, for so long that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) became sad. According to the reports that have reached us, he was so sad that on several occasions he wanted to throw himself from the top of high mountains, but every time he went to the top of a mountain in order to throw himself down from it, Jibreel appeared to him and said: O Muhammad, you are truly the Messenger of Allah. And he would calm down as a result and feel at ease, and he would go back. When the revelation had ceased for a long time, he would do the same thing again, and when he reached a mountaintop, Jibreel would appear to him and say the same thing to him.
This additional material (which speaks of the cessation of revelation and the Prophet’s contemplating suicide) is not the words of ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her). Rather these are the words of az-Zuhri, who was one of the Taabi‘een and was not contemporary to that event. He did not state that any of the Sahaabah told him that; therefore when he stated that in the report, he prefaced it with the words, “According to the reports that have reached us.”
Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
Moreover, the one who said “According to the reports that have reached us” is az-Zuhri. What these words mean is: one of the things that we heard about the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is this story. It is one of the stories that az-Zuhri heard, and it is not mawsool (i.e., it has no connected chain of narration between him and the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)). Al-Karmaani said: This is what appears to be the case.
Fath al-Baari (12/359).
Abu Shaamah al-Maqdisi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
These are the words of az-Zuhri or someone else, and not ‘Aa’ishah. And Allah knows best. That is because he said “According to the reports that have reached us”, and ‘Aa’ishah did not say any such thing a concerning this matter.
Sharh al-Hadith al-Muqtafa fi Mab‘ath an-Nabi al-Mustafa (p. 177).
Thirdly:
The reports of az-Zuhri in which he says “According to the reports that have reached us” are not acceptable, because their chains of narration are interrupted from the beginning. Hence they are like mu‘allaq reports [mu‘allaq, lit. “hanging”; a report in which one or more narrators is/are omitted from the beginning of the chain]. The fact that such stories or mu‘allaq reports are mentioned in the book of Imam al-Bukhaari does not mean that they are saheeh (sound) in his view, or that it can be said of them “it was narrated by al-Bukhaari”, because the report of which that may be said is the report that he narrated with a complete isnad (chain of narration).
Shaykh al-Albaani (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
Attributing it to al-Bukhaari [by saying “it was narrated by al-Bukhaari”, as if it were a saheeh hadith] is a serious mistake, because it gives the impression that this story of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) wanting to throw himself down from a mountaintop is saheeh according to the conditions set by al-Bukhaari. But that is not the case; rather al-Bukhaari mentioned this at the end of the hadith of ‘Aa’ishah about the beginning of revelation… [and he quoted the report mentioned above].
This additional material was also narrated by Ahmad (6/232-233); Abu Na‘eem in ad-Dalaa’il (p. 68-69); al-Bayhaqi in ad-Dalaa’il (1/393-395) via ‘Abd ar-Razzaaq from Ma‘mar.
Via this isnad it was also narrated by Muslim (1/98), but he did not narrate the same wording; rather he narrated the version of Yoonus from Ibn Shihaab, which does not contain this additional material. It was also narrated by Muslim and Ahmad (6/223) via ‘Aqeel ibn Khaalid that Ibn Shihaab said … without this additional material. It was also narrated by al-Bukhaari at the beginning of as-Saheeh from ‘Aqeel.
Keep making accusations and i will keep destroying you🤡
Wait, I have no idea what your talking about since I’m a new convert and I’m still trying to memorise the prayers, but are there genuinely people who think the sahabah forgot how to recite Al Fatiha?
_The Sahabah_ ? Forgetting how to recite *_Al Fatiha_* ? After reciting it for a bare minimum of 17 times a day everyday for over a decade?
That’s literally impossible.
Where does Quran say the word revert? No one is born knowing the last prophet and Islam. Islam is more than just monotheism
@@ThinkingFreedom its a hadith its not found in the quran
and dont forgot the sunnah and night prayers. So it could be well over 50+ times
@@masterpupil1132 you are referring to rough translations of the Quran
@@masterpupil1132 you would never get the true meaning encompassed in another language than the original, as as they say, meaning is lost in translation
Jazakallahukhairan for making a video about this topic. You explained the relation between the ahruf and qira'a really well mashallah. I had some confusion prior to seeing this.
Here are some of the differences:
Quran 2:125
Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take)
Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken)
Quran 2:140
Hafs: taquluna (You say)
Warsh: yaquluna (They say)
Quran 2:184
Hafs: miskeenin (poor person
Warsh: masakeena (poor people)
Quran 3:146
Hafs: qatala (fought)
Warsh: qutila (was killed)
Quran 40:26
Hafs: aw an (or that)
Warsh: wa an (and that)
Quran 43:19
Hafs: ibaad (slaves)
Warsh: inda (with)
These people who could not even preserve one Bible in its original form.. Not even the original message of it want to insult Muslims for preserving Quran's different(all divinly accepted) recitations 😕🙄
julie andrews
.......its on you. you litteraly discribed your self.
Anon Ymous Farid already has a video on that
@Anon Ymous
Sahih Muslim 4194? At first read
*Saheeh Bukhari*
Volume 8, Book 82, Number 816:
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
'Umar said, "I am afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, "We do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy Book," and consequently they may go astray by leaving an obligation that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm that the penalty of Rajam be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual intercourse, if he is already married and the crime is proved by witnesses or pregnancy or confession." Sufyan added, "I have memorized this narration in this way." 'Umar added, "Surely Allah's Apostle carried out the penalty of Rajam, and so did we after him."
*Saheeh Muslim*
Book 017, Number 4194:
'Abdullah b. 'Abbas reported that 'Umar b. Khattab sat on the pulpit of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: Verily Allah sent Muhammad (may peace be upon him) with truth and He sent down the Book upon him, and the verse of stoning was included in what was sent down to him. We recited it, retained it in our memory and understood it. Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) awarded the punishment of stoning to death (to the married adulterer and adulteress) and, after him, we also awarded the punishment of stoning, I am afraid that with the lapse of time, the people (may forget it) and may say: We do not find the punishment of stoning in the Book of Allah, and thus go astray by abandoning this duty prescribed by Allah. Stoning is a duty laid down in Allah's Book for married men and women who commit adultery when proof is established, or it there is pregnancy, or a confession.
Christian missionaries tend to argue that this verse was removed from the Quran and they claim that this is proof that Muslims corrupted the Quran. Let's see if this argument holds any water.
The alleged verse is...
الشيخ والشيخة إذا زنيا فارجموهما البتة
The old man and the old lady if they committed adultery then stone them
Another opinion is that it is...
الشيخ والشيخة إذا زنيا فارجموهما البتة نكالا من الله والله عزيز حكيم
The old man and the old lady if they committed adultery then stone them as a punishment from Allah and Allah is the Most Mighty, Most Wise
Imam ibn Hajar Al Asqalani says in his commentary on Saheeh Bukhari...
فقال عمر : لما نزلت أتيت النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فقلت أكتبها ؟ فكأنه كره ذلك , فقال عمر : ألا ترى أن الشيخ إذا زنى ولم يحصن جلد , وأن الشاب إذا زنى وقد أحصن رجم
Umar said: "When this verse came down I approached the Prophet peace be upon him so I asked him: Should I write it down?' It is as if he hated that" Then Umar said: "Cant you see that if the old man if he commits adultery he does not get the whip, and that if the young man if he commits adultery he gets stoned?" (Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani, Fathul Bari, Kitab: Al Hudood, Bab: Al I'tiraaf bil Zina, Commentary on Hadith no. 6327, Source)
Here we clearly see that the Prophet (peace be upon him) did not want the verse to be written down because it was never meant to be part of the text of the Quran. The scholars of Islam are unanimous that the recitation of this verse has been abrogated but its ruling still remains in effect.
However, the only reason why Umar got emotional and wanted to put the verse in the Quran was because he was afraid that one day people would think that its ruling had been cancelled. However, the companions did not allow him to because they all knew that its recitation had been abrogated. In order to put a verse in the Quran there needed to be two witnesses and Umar was all by himself. Umar himself knew that its recitation was abrogated but he was getting emotional, for he feared that people in the future would not believe in the ruling of stoning the adulterers.
Imam ibn Hajar Al Asqalani has in his commentary...
أي في الآية المذكورة التي نسخت تلاوتها وبقي حكمها , وقد وقع ما خشيه عمر أيضا فأنكر الرجم طائفة من الخوارج أو معظمهم وبعض المعتزلة
In the verse whose recitation has been abrogated but its ruling remained, and it has happened what Umar feared. A tribe from the Khawarij or most of them and some of the Mu'tazilites rejected the stoning.
وقد أخرج عبد الرزاق والطبري من وجه آخر عن ابن عباس أن عمر قال " سيجيء قوم يكذبون بالرجم "
And it was reported by Abd al Razzaq and Al Tabari from another view that Ibn Abbas said that Umar said "There will come a people that will lie (or disbelieve) in the stoning" (Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani, Fathul Bari, Kitab: Al Hudood, Bab: Rajam Al Hublah min Zana Eezha Ahsanat, Commentary on Hadith no. 6328, Source)
Imam Nawawi says in his commentary in Saheeh Muslim...
وهذا مما نسخ لفظه وبقي حكمه
And this is whose recitation has been abrogated and its ruling remained.
وفي ترك الصحابة كتابة هذه الآية دلالة ظاهرة أن المنسوخ لا يكتب في المصحف , وفي إعلان عمر بالرجم وهو على المنبر وسكوت الصحابة وغيرهم من الحاضرين عن مخالفته بالإنكار دليل على ثبوت الرجم
And the companions of the Prophet abandoning the writing of this verse is clear evidence that the abrogated should not be written in the Quran and that Umar's statement about the stoning as he is on the pulpit and the silence of the companions and other than them from who were present from opposing him is evidence about the ruling of the stoning (still being implemented) (Imam Nawawi, Sharh Saheeh Muslim, Kitab: Al Hudood, Bab: Rajam Al Thayb fil Zina, Commentary on Hadith no. 3201, Source)
Al Sindi says in his commentary on Sunan Ibn Majah...
أي آية الرجم وهذه الآية مما نسخ لفظها وبقي حكمها
The verse of stoning: Its recitation has been abrogated and its ruling still remains in effect. (Al Sindi, Sharh Sunan Ibn Majah, Kitab: Al Hudood, Bab: Al Rajam, Commentary on Hadith no. 2543, Source)
Muhammad Shams al-Haqq al-Adhim Abadi says in his commentary on Sunan Abu Dawud...
وهذا مما نسخ لفظه وبقي حكمه
And this is whose recitation has been abrogated but ruling remains in effect. (Muhammad Shams al-Haqq al-Adhim Abadi, Awn al-Mabud Sharh Sunan Abu Dawud, Kitab: Al Hudood, Bab: Fil Rajam, Commentary on Hadith no. 3835, Source)
Conclusion
We can clearly see that there was a consensus amongst the companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the scholars that the recitation of the verse on stoning was abrogated and that they did not corrupt it. How can all the companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) who sacrificed everything they had for this religion just happen to decide to come together and purposely corrupt the Quran by removing this verse? What motive would they have in doing so if its law was to remain being implemented? So there can't be a motive to remove this verse simply because they wished to not follow its ruling since the ruling still remains in effect up to this day.
So clearly the evidence shows that this recitation was always meant to be abrogated while its ruling remains in effect.
@Anon Ymous of course they will deny their existence. They are trying to go back 2 to 4000 years of leople of whose language and exact location is unknown based on the bible that is fiction lol.
@Anon Ymous lol what do you mean shows? , explain the evidence?
The Qur’an is equally as eloquent in all of those different modes and Qira’at. If this isn’t a proof that they were intentional, I don’t know what is 🤷🏻♂️
I mean one of the biggest miracles of the text of Qur'an is that has perfect ring formations in its ahzab, parts, chapters...even ayat Al Kursi has it.
I suggest u to search for it on YT or Google
Minecraft Station I already knew about that but thanks.
@@LordYamcha666 I saw the Messenger of Allah sucking the saliva of Hassan and Hussein as a man sucks the date.Ibn Asaker | Source: History of Damascus Page or number: 13/223 | Summary of the updated: Sahih
Imam Abu Hanifah "it is permissible to penetrate the mahrams (mothers, sister, daughter etc.) after wrapping silk around the Penis.”The Shafi’i and the Maliki schools consider a man's marrying his daughter born of fornication as permissible and so also marrying his sister, his son's daughter, his daughter's daughter, his brother's daughter, and his sister's daughter, because she is legally a stranger to him and because the law of inheritance does not apply between them, nor the law of maintenance. (al-Mughni. vol. 6, the chapter on marriage)
@@salafichristiansubordinati6496 The last part is a fabrication. Neither Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Maliki, Imam Shafi`i or Imam Ibn Hanbal ever permitted incest. It goes against the Qur'an so how can you believe in these obvious fabrications?
Even in English the text is incredibly intelligent and eloquent :-)
Surah 24:61: It is no restriction upon the blind, and it is no restriction upon the lame, and it is no restriction upon the sick, nor upon yourselves, that you eat from your houses, or from your fathers' houses, or your mothers' houses, or your brother's houses, or your sisters' houses, or the houses of your paternal uncles, or the houses of your paternal aunts, or the houses of your maternal uncles, or the houses of your maternal aunts, or that of which you possess the keys, or of your friend. It is no fault in you that you eat all together or in diverse groups.
Jazakallah brother
You have introduced this topic in a very clear way. I am inspired to dig deeper. I have avoided this knowledge because I felt I haven’t memorized the Quran so I shouldn’t focus on it , but now I’m thinking that was not wise as I have remained ignorant for years on the topic
This was a video that was much much needed at this time. A video like this was exactly what I wanted to see for the past two days.
So the answer is that all the variations are authentic and the lost surahs (eaten by a sheep etc.) are abrogated? Isn't that logic somehow going into the wrong direction?
@@hans471 Iam 2 years late but still, that verses where for certain times, so when the certain time for the verse passed and no more was needed the verse was totally erased from the face of the earth by Allah SWT, go search in every place you will not find any word of the verses for certain times
Very very important video. Baarak Allah feekum ustad farid.
Because of all this noise those Christian polemics made around 30 Qur'an's and such I went down some rabbit holes, and now alhamdulillah i am learning the 10 qira'at and it's the best thing that happened to me in a long time! Did not know I could fall more in love with the Qur'an.
Yeah yeah when you claim not a single letter being changed. Pooof your card house just fall
Here are some of the differences:
Quran 2:125
Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take)
Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken)
Quran 2:140
Hafs: taquluna (You say)
Warsh: yaquluna (They say)
Quran 2:184
Hafs: miskeenin (poor person
Warsh: masakeena (poor people)
Quran 3:146
Hafs: qatala (fought)
Warsh: qutila (was killed)
Quran 40:26
Hafs: aw an (or that)
Warsh: wa an (and that)
Quran 43:19
Hafs: ibaad (slaves)
Warsh: inda (with)
Which quran did you fall in love with?
@@a.s2205 All of them give the same contextual meaning with reference to the text. Isn't it beautiful? MashAllah. Plus, there's a Hadith which confirms the ahqaf so i don't understand what you're whining about.
@@a.s2205 "And they have taken from the standing place of Abraham a place of player."
"And you shall take from the standing place of Abraham a place of player."
Put these in the verse, each gives the same meaning. Just first, third person pov difference. They/ you is used to address the believers. The Quran I'd direct addressing the prophet and indirectly addressing the believers in the hafs version whereas you'll find the opposite in the warsh. Each is fulfilled, they have/ you shall take a place of player.
You are a gem to the ummah
Jazakallah Brother Farid. Your videos have been very informative and have cleared a lot of doubts I once had. Thank you very much and may Allah bless you
Here are some of the differences:
Quran 2:125
Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take)
Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken)
Quran 2:140
Hafs: taquluna (You say)
Warsh: yaquluna (They say)
Quran 2:184
Hafs: miskeenin (poor person
Warsh: masakeena (poor people)
Quran 3:146
Hafs: qatala (fought)
Warsh: qutila (was killed)
Quran 40:26
Hafs: aw an (or that)
Warsh: wa an (and that)
Quran 43:19
Hafs: ibaad (slaves)
Warsh: inda (with)
Maasya Allah tabarakallah, that's how we muslim inform them to the truth of islam..it's our duty to do dawah even their heart deny it. Insyaa Allah hidayah come to their hearts so disbelief turning to belief in islam..as simple as that. Alhamdulillah we have brother Farid in youtube🙏
May Allah grant you the highest Jannah and greatly reward you for your hard and honest work
Jazakallah br. Farid.
Faith is a blessing of Allah Subhanhutalah. Born Muslims are gifted this masha-Allah, converts should regard it more, murtads should rediscover it, embrace it and appreciate it.
Christian Apologists/Missionaries: Quran has been changed over and over again.
Also Christian Apologists/Missionaries: *believes the bible to be free from tahreef*
Farid Responds my dear brother you are a gem amongst gems.
I shall in Sha Allah take the banner of defending Islam from the angle of Scientific Miracles.
Everyone must have a specialty in a specific field.
Wish I could contact you.
@Denzo Dridz trying so long.
made twitter and who do you think I followed first ?
Respond Farid responds respond
@Sage of Synergism read 37 38 39 40 , it doesn't say rest , it runs to appointed term for it further verse gives u understanding 😩
@Sage of Synergism *Scientific mistakes in bible*
*Bible confirms flat earth!*
Matthew 4:8 says, “Once again, the devil took him to a very high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world [cosmos] in their glory.” Obviously, this would be possible only if the earth were flat.
Disregarding the dome, the essential flatness of the earth's surface is required by verses like Daniel 4:10-11. In Daniel, the king “saw a tree of great height at the centre of the earth...reaching with its top to the sky and visible to the earth's farthest bounds.” If the earth were flat, a sufficiently tall tree would be visible to “the earth's farthest bounds,” but this is impossible on a spherical earth.
*Bible says earth has four corners:*
"He will set up a banner for the nations, And will assemble the outcasts of Israel, And gather together the dispersed of Judah From the four corners of the earth."(Isaiah 11:12)
"After these things I saw four angels standing at the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, on the sea, or on any tree."(Revelation 7:1)
“Have you ever given orders to the morning,or shown the dawn its place,that it might take the earth by the edgesand shake the wicked out of it?The earth takes shape like clay under a seal;its features stand out like those of a garment.(Job 38:12-14)
*Bible says earth is fixed*
"tremble before him, all the earth! The earth is set firmly in place and cannot be moved."( 1 Chronicles 16:30)
"The LORD is king. He is clothed with majesty and strength. The earth is set firmly in place and cannot be moved."(psalm 93:1)
Say to all the nations, "The LORD is king! The earth is set firmly in place and cannot be moved; he will judge the peoples with justice."(Psalm 96:10)
You who laid the foundations of the earth, So that it should not be moved forever,(Psalm 104:5)
*Using blood to purify house!*
Leviticus 14:51
"Then he is to take the cedar wood, the hyssop, the scarlet yarn and the live bird, dip them into the blood of the dead bird and the fresh water, and sprinkle the house seven times."
@Sage of Synergism - Qur’an 3:35 onwards... (paraphrased)
A pregnant woman from the family of Imran dedicates her unborn to God's service in the Temple thinking it would be a boy.
When Mary was born, she was looked after by Zakariyya in the Temple at Jerusalem & later on, it was here that Archangel Gabriel announced to her that she will give birth to Jesus (as).
IMPORTANT NOTE : make note of the fact that whenever the Qur’an mentions Maryam (Mary the mum of Jesus /Isa) peace be upon them:
- She is in the Temple at Jerusalem.
- Her mother is not alive.
- She has no brothers named Moses or Aaron.
- Her son is clearly named 'Jesus SON OF MARY' who came to correct the teachings of Moses (pbut) who came many centuries earlier.
- and Mary is mentioned by name so many times & is referred to as 'Chosen over all other women'.
It is necessary to know all this so that one doesn't get confused when Mary is called "Oh sister of Aaron.. " by her ppl to remind her of her Priestly status in the Temple. She was, in effect, a Priestess living in the Temple.
Disbelievers say the Qur’an is wrong & got Mary mixed up with Miriam who was the older sister of Moses & Aaron (pbut).
Note that the Qur’an never names this Miriam but only mentions her story briefly:
- She is in Egypt
- She follows her baby brother, Moses, in his basket on the Nile River.
- She informs Pharaoh's wife about somebody that can suckle the crying baby.
- Miriam's MOTHER is called on by Pharaoh's wife to suckle baby Moses.
So all this proves that the 2 characters (Mary & Miriam) are different in the Qur’an with totally different stories.
Much needed bro. People talk in terminologies,but nobody talk with examples, you just went ahead and did a demo. Would be great if we had links of entire recitation of the quran in each of the qiraat
JazakAllah khair nobody explained it as good as you
I seek refuge in Allah against the accursed satan
And to recite the Qur'an." And whoever is guided is only guided for [the benefit of] himself; and whoever strays - say, "I am only [one] of the warners." (92) [Qur'an Chapter An-Naml, The Ants]
May Allah Bless you
Farid: Early Scholars, Big Scholars of Islam says this and this about the Qirat and therefore this is not a mistake.
Enemies of Islam: No no no, this famous "celebrity scholar" said this and that, so Qur'an is not preserved.
David Wood: Your Koran has changes.
Farid: Nope. There were different Qira'at, all correct.
David Wood: So there were different Korans according to "the Origin of the Koran."
Muslims: ????
@Sage of Synergism give me a narration says A verse was lost , hafs it's just a type of Qira'a (recitation) , Quran couldn't be changed because it is preserved and memorized in our hearts, So you Islam Haters Inventing lies Without proofs to Attack Islam and you Forget Your corrupted book !!!! Please show Me a single Sentence from your manuscripts at the time of Jesus pbuh I dare you and Apologize me for my engliszzhhh
@Sage of Synergism why repeating the same nonsense after being refuted days ago? Get a brain...... I mean a life
@Sage of Synergism
Musnan Ahmad 21245 is a “Dawi'f hadith." “Dawi'f" means false. You can't truly prove anything. That's why always targeting unauthentic source. 👇
a- The narration is reported from Ubayy through narrators who are doubtful, other then the fact that just after Ubayy (RA) there is only one narrator. Many scholars, both classical and recent, have termed its chains as weak.
b- The narration contains a real time error for it ascribes a place to alleged verse on stoning whereas the Prophet (PBUH) did not allow it to be written which logically entails he did not specify its place. Also there is no evidence of Prophet (PBUH) reciting it that might have specified its position. This point weakens the position of the scholars who authenticated the narration.
c- Even if we accept the narration, then it simply means the verses were abrogated.
d- Ubayy (RA) himself was the member of the committee standardizing the text, but he did not make any bid to get the alleged verse he remembered into the text.
Verily the Qur’an stays above all doubt in its preservation. An Italian orientalist Laura Veccia Vaglieri rightly said;
"But there is another proof of the Divinity of the Qur’an; it is the fact that it has been preserved intact through the ages since the time of its Revelation till the present day." (Apologia dell’ Islamismo, translated by Dr. Aldo Caselli under the title An Interpretation of Islam p.57 Muslim Book Mark, 2004)
@@zd4790 these Christians are pure comedy lol you refute them but they keep repeating the same lies
According to hadith حَدِيث literature, the Quran is revealed in seven Ahruf أَحْرُف (the plural of harf حَرْف). Ahruf are distinct from Qira'at قِرَاءَات. Malik Ibn Anas reported that the second Rashidun Caliph Umar Ibn al-Khattab said: "I heard Hisham Ibn Hakim Ibn Hizam reading Surat Al-Furqan in a different way from the one I used to read it, and the Prophet himself had read out this surah to me. Consequently, as soon as I heard him, I wanted to get hold of him. However, I gave him respite until he had finished the prayer. Then I got hold of his cloak and dragged him to the Prophet. I said to him: “I have heard this person [Hisham Ibn Hakim Ibn Hizam] reading Surah Al Furqan in a different way from the one you had read it out to me.” The Prophet said: “Leave him alone [O ‘Umar].” Then he said to Hashim: “Read [it].” [Umar said:] “He read it out in the same way as he had done before me.” [At this,] the Prophet said: “It was revealed thus.” Then the Prophet asked me to read it out. So I read it out. [At this], he said: “It was revealed thus; this Quran has been revealed in seven Ahruf. You can read it in any of them you find easy from among them."[1]
NOTE TO ANYONE WHO STILL BELIEVES CP IS AN EXPERT IN ARABIC:
He still can't even pronounce the word Qur'an correctly in Arabic lol.
LMAO Your prophet was an illiterate and the Qu'ran is FULL of grammatical errors. That's why the Pagan arabs used to make fun of your prophet.
Anonymous 333 atleast he knew how to speak Arabic properly😉
Go look at ur corrupted bible first then speak
@@rushercrusher875 hahaha yeah sure, with his broken front teeth he spoke arabic exceptionally well. Hahaha fraud religion, disgusting cult.
@@Christislord172 what grammatical errors? the one who makes the claim provides the evidence
@@Christislord172 the best non muslim poets of that time were in awe when they heard the quran.
Jazakallah khair akhi, May Allah bless you abundantly in this life and next...ameen
This video is really really excellent. Barak Allah feek akhi.
Thank you brother
This shows how the enemies of Islam are trying to attack our Quran so desperately
I love you brother! May Allah bless you. Continue your work! InShaAllah we'll obliterate those who mislead by the will of Allah.
Mashallah brother, keep making these beautiful videos. Barakallahu feekum
Wa'alaykumu Salaam WarahmatuAllahi Wabarakatuh Farid!
My teachers told me I’m not allowed to even try the other qiraat until I master hafs.
It's good advice since you'll have a solid foundation to fall back on and ensures you won't make a mistake in reciting, best of luck IA
FABULOUS. The points i most enjoyed were the diagram showing how qiraaf link to ahruf, and the very persuasive common sense argument about how if it was due to mistakes then fatiha would be free of them,
I learned so much from this video. Thank you so much. Jazakallah khayr
I am from shafi school of thought and we have total 42 rakah which includes fard and sunnah. How the heck can someone mess up even after reciting something 42 times a day? And the hanafis according to me have more than this. Plus the additional salat of tahhajud, after the fajr salah before the zohr salah, etc. How the hell can someone mess up?
Allahumdulliah for ISLAM.
Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
كُنْ وَرِعًا تَكُنْ أَعْبَدَ النَّاسِ وَكُنْ قَنِعًا تَكُنْ أَشْكَرَ النَّاسِ وَأَحِبَّ لِلنَّاسِ مَا تُحِبُّ لِنَفْسِكَ تَكُنْ مُؤْمِنًا وَأَحْسِنْ جِوَارَ مَنْ جَاوَرَكَ تَكُنْ مُسْلِمًا وَأَقِلَّ الضَّحِكَ فَإِنَّ كَثْرَةَ الضَّحِكِ تُمِيتُ الْقَلْبَ
Be devout and you will be the most pious of people. Be content and you will be the most grateful of people. Love for people what you love for yourself and you will be a believer. Behave well with your neighbors and you will be a Muslim. Laugh less, for excessive laughter will deaden the heart.
Source: Sunan Ibn Mājah 4217, Source: Sahih
I saw the Messenger of Allah sucking the saliva of Hassan and Hussein as a man sucks the date.Ibn Asaker | Source: History of Damascus Page or number: 13/223 | Summary of the updated: Sahih
Imam Abu Hanifah "it is permissible to penetrate the mahrams (mothers, sister, daughter etc.) after wrapping silk around the Penis.”The Shafi’i and the Maliki schools consider a man's marrying his daughter born of fornication as permissible and so also marrying his sister, his son's daughter, his daughter's daughter, his brother's daughter, and his sister's daughter, because she is legally a stranger to him and because the law of inheritance does not apply between them, nor the law of maintenance. (al-Mughni. vol. 6, the chapter on marriage)
@@salafichristiansubordinati6496 Peace, I seek refuge in Allah against the accursed satan
In the name of Allah most beneficent most merciful
Say, "He is Allah, [who is] One, (1) Allah, the Eternal Refuge. (2) He neither begets nor is born, (3) Nor is there to Him any equivalent." (4) [Qur'an Chapter Al-Ikhlas, Sincreity of Faith]
@@tarek399 I am aramaic Christian and you have a pic of Alaha if you thing that this relate to your Moon God Al Lah then you are WRONG.
@@salafichristiansubordinati6496 jesus prayed to Allah(mat 26:39) soooo
@@salafichristiansubordinati6496 Peace, I seek refuge in Allah against the accursed satan
And of His signs are the night and day and the sun and moon. Do not prostrate to the sun or to the moon, but prostate to Allah, who created them, if it should be Him that you worship. (37) But if they are arrogant - then those who are near your Lord exalt Him by night and by day, and they do not become weary. (38) [Qur'an Chapter Fussilat, Detailed Signs]
'🔨
🤯 *David's Father*
*David hits the heck out of the old man*
😆😂🤣
He's disgusting
Please that was the man past, am Muslim and I get problem with my father, I most know how he felt.
@@Naruto-cg8rl yeah so that gives you the permission to nearly kill your father...
@@Naruto-cg8rl r u being sarcasm lol
Tick Tok it’s hammer time!
Alhumdullilah. Thanks brother Farid. I was looking for this for quite a while.
You are just amazing. JazakAllah kahir
Beautiful. Simply beautiful. The perfect mix of precision, preservation and divine mercy. Ya Allaaaah! ❤️🌀
Here are some of the differences:
Quran 2:125
Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take)
Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken)
Quran 2:140
Hafs: taquluna (You say)
Warsh: yaquluna (They say)
Quran 2:184
Hafs: miskeenin (poor person
Warsh: masakeena (poor people)
Quran 3:146
Hafs: qatala (fought)
Warsh: qutila (was killed)
Quran 40:26
Hafs: aw an (or that)
Warsh: wa an (and that)
Quran 43:19
Hafs: ibaad (slaves)
Warsh: inda (with)
Thank you for this video. I wasn't clear on that.
5:00 add to that khlaf al'shir خلف العاشر recite مالك in his qir'a قراءة but in his narration from Hamza خلف عن حمزة recites it as ملك the same person transmitted it in both ways.
Beautiful, Jazakum Allah khairan
Great thank you.. I'm Muslim but not arabic daily spoken nation. Your simple but informative and sincere video answered most of my question about arabic dialect and why it was written that way in Quran. In My small country we have more that 60 dialect. One same word could be has different meaning on other dialects. Tq sir.
Idk why any muslim would take those jokers seriously Who claims completely accepted different qirats as corruption
But maybe it is mainly because us not properly learning our deen sadly
Ignorant Muslims that aren't aware of these things. Some young Muslims (especially those living in the West) are extremely ignorant of their own religion almost got he point that they don't truly understand It's Essence. May Allâh help them.
Someone realy said qirats are mistakes 🤣😂
All 37 versions represent the same perfectly preserved book! Plurality in unity! 😇
@ハヤ02 can you tell me why Allah revealed the Quran in so many Arabic dialects but in no other language? How does this make sense? 😲
@@hans471
They are only 10 Qiraats, not 37.
Stop lying.
@@Emir_969 there are 37 different printed quran today. How you align those with the 10 qirat is not my business
@@hans471
Show me different meanings between these so called 37 Qurans.
I mean like Show me a quranic verse with 37 different meanings.
subhanallah mashalah allah raise your ranks in this world and the next br farid keep refuting the haters videos
This channel is a blessing, Thank you Farid !
Masha Allah, may Allah bless and preserve you, nice work
Christians watching this going like is there a dumb down version of explanation
Perfectly preserved 👍🏼🎉🎉
Word for word..
Malik and maalik👍🏼
@Stark Industries really? So a master is also a king? That is Arabic? You guys are only desperate that is all!
@@forgiven196 what's is the problem here?
Prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h recited in both ways. So there is nothing wrong in it. Since your claim was that quran was changed(after the death of prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h).
Please watch the video first.
Even Christians mistranslated Hebrew Scriptures of the Jew. Jews don't read their fabricated 46 versions of Bible. Now they targeting Quran.
10:00 sometimes the Yemeni sheikh would recite this way in our masjid. We have
9 masjid in 3 miles
They still can't get over the fact that Daniel destroyed their beloved *prophet* , do they?
True... Mohammeds relvelations are not in line with the prophecies of Daniel... 😣
???
christianity is rubbish
بارك الله فيك ❤️
BarakAllah feek habibi for teaching us our Deen and debunikg the lying snakes!
السلام عليكم
May Allah reward you . In the future it may be beneficial to make a video about the Isnads , showing the sanad of each Qiraat and how each reaches the level of tawattur i.e mass transmission on each level. We often hear this but to see it and understand destroys many arguments and misunderstandings.
جزاك الله خيرا
Where do Muslim scholars get those beautiful books? I'm not even Muslim, but I find those books on their shelves so beautiful
These books about the religion
Hadith
Tafsir
Fiqh
Jarh and ta'deel
And the likes of Islamic books in the original language
Basically they are direct physical sources
Better than websites
I saw these websites sometimes messing up translations and inserting incomplete quotes that created misunderstandings leading to arguments against Islam 😂🤦♂️
Also sometimes false grading of hadith
It is rare though
You will need to learn Arabic for these books 😅
Aoa I was waiting for this
AOA?? what does that mean?
@@garsayfsomali assalam un alaikum for short
Jajakumullah khair bro. May Allah grant you jannah. Ameen
Well explained brother Farid ( batman /Bruce Wayne ) jazakallah
Why does this video only have 4.9K Likes? Just adding comment to aid the spread of this content haha.
Fr
Excellent video brother. So interesting that "hum" is the Qureysh dialect. I was told the "hum" is adjusted when with a Jaar to "him" but it looks like the default "hum" would also be correct.
Peoples here in my country memorrizes all this Qiraat. Even though i know some.
which country bro? Also I know that the Qur'anic students in Madinah (who are all hafidh) study the all Qiraat and Ahruf.
@@aq4356 Nigeria (Northern Nigeria).
@@safiyapost mashaaAllah, may Allah bless you and your people!
Lucky u
@Sage of Synergism Where does this say the verses were "lost" LMAO. There's something called abrogation, which you obviously dont know because instead of actually studying Islam you watch too much David Wood, keep living in your bubble, millions and millions of Muslims throughout history have memorized and preserved the Qur'an, I know it hurts you christians really badly, now get lost.
PS: That particular hadith seems to be weak but there's nothing unique about it as there are other hadith which are authentic and mention verses which arent in the Qur'an anymore, its very normal, verses get abrogated and they are not included in the Qur'an anymore.
Allahumma Barik by brother !❤️
Jazak Allahu khairan to people of those channel you are very informative
May Allah reward you for your niyyah and your efforts. May Allah help to continue your work
Please recommend me books regarding qiraat, hafs explanation etc... I only have one book which i haven't read yet "the Quranic text"
@Mohamed Ismail oh no, Yasir Qadhi lol. This dude himself don't believe Quran to be preserved. The 2nd book you recommended i already talked about it> =]
I have a question do we have all seven modes? Sorry if it's a stupid question 😅
Yes we do I I beleive
We have the 10 recitations which come from a combination of the 7 different variations (ahruf). All of which are authentic from the Prophet ﷺ.
@@izzuibrahim8848 and all 7 versions have two subversions and then there are another 20. All of them are authentic, allhamdullilah 😇
Salamu alaykum , can you also place the TH-cam URL link of the Quranic recitation? Jazāk Allāhu Khayran!
Here are some of the differences:
Quran 2:125
Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take)
Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken)
Quran 2:140
Hafs: taquluna (You say)
Warsh: yaquluna (They say)
Quran 2:184
Hafs: miskeenin (poor person
Warsh: masakeena (poor people)
Quran 3:146
Hafs: qatala (fought)
Warsh: qutila (was killed)
Quran 40:26
Hafs: aw an (or that)
Warsh: wa an (and that)
Quran 43:19
Hafs: ibaad (slaves)
Warsh: inda (with)
Shh boy
Thank you brother it was very informative, jazaak Allah khairan.
Muslim borthers/sisters should share this video, so that both Muslims and Non-Muslim can gather knowledge about qiraat.
و الله متم نوره و لو كره الكافرون
Akhi may we have a tour of your bookshelf lol
Please stop referring to AP as Apostate Prophet.... His real name is aPOState Profit.... 😂😂😂
He's ex Christian
Thanks a lot Akhi for clarifying. I was really confused about this issue.
I got to learn about something i dont think i woukd have otherwise.
Thanks to man like Dave
@Denzo Dridz He learnt something about Islam that he would not have learnt otherwise thanks to David 'Hammer time' wood
@FARID RESPONDS
Jazaak'Allahu khayran, akhi Farid, for this explanation.
Why don't you make a video clarifying and correcting Shabir Ali in his latest video
The Sanaa Manuscript : was the Qur'an preserved accurately ?
Even though he says that the Qur'an we have today is a GENUINE REPRESENTATION of the revelation sent down to the Prophet (asws), he fails to mention that the 'different wordings' were only the 7 different dialects and not the OWN WORDS, OWN REPHRASING of the sahaba as he claims. His words are somehow misleading to the ignorant and to the hateful alike.
Btw, I was really disappointed to have missed your interview by brother Sajid Lipham, because I didn't receive any notification for it ! ☹️☹️☹️
You forgot that Christians read Qiraat imam murrah.
Christians, atheists, and all islamaphobes: Farid is just making an excuse to cover the holes.
@ZaharSadiev I think you took his comment wrong, I think hes saying thats what the islamaphobes are saying.
ZaharSadiev damn, you literally don’t know satire. I love Farid. Go back and read that comment and ACTUALLY understand it properly.
Barakallahu fikum!
Really appreciate this video. So many non arabic speaking muslims are oblivious to these matters. That’s where the haters find their chance to deceive them
Very Good! JazakAllahu khayran!
Official written copy by Uthman
The Quran was originally revealed in Quraishi dialect of Arabic. But to facilitate the people who speak other dialects, in their understanding and comprehension, Allah revealed the Quran finally in seven dialects of Arabic. During the period of Caliph Uthman (third successor to the Prophet) differences in reading the Quran among the various tribes became obvious, due to the various dialectical recitations. Dispute was arising, with each tribe calling its recitation as the correct one. This alarmed Uthman, who made an official copy in the Quraishi dialect, the dialect in which the Quran was revealed to the Prophet and was memorized by his companions. Thus this compilation by Uthman's Committee is not a different version of the Quran (like the Biblical versions) but the same original revelation given to the Prophet by One God, Allah.
Narrated Anas bin Malik: Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham (Syria) and the people of Iraq were waging war to conquer Armenia and Azherbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their differences in the recitation of the Quran, so he said to Uthman, 'O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and Christians did before'. So Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, 'Send us the manuscripts of the Quran so that we may compile the Quranic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you'. Hafsa sent it to Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin Az-Zubair, Said bin Al-As and Abdur Rahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, 'In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Quran, then write it in their (Quraishi) tongue'. They did so, and when they had written many copies, Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied and ordered that all the other Quranic materials whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt…" [29]
Again a very stringent criteria was set up by this Committee to prevent any alteration of the Revelation.
1. The earlier recension (Original copy prepared by Abu Bakr) was to serve as the principal basis of the new one. [30]
2. Any doubt that might be raised as to the phrasing of a particular passage in the written text was to be dispelled by summoning persons known to have learned the passage in question from the Prophet. [31]
3. Uthman himself was to supervise the work of the Council. [32]
When the final recension was completed, Uthman sent a copy of it to each of the major cities of Makka, Damascus, Kufa, Basra and Madina.
The action of Uthman to burn the other copies besides the final recension, though obviously drastic, was for the betterment and harmony of the whole community and was unanimously approved by the Companions of the Prophet.
Zaid ibn Thabit is reported to have said: "I saw the Companions of Muhammad (going about) saying, 'By God, Uthman has done well! By God, Uthman has done well!" [33]
Another esteemed Companion Musab ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas said: "I saw the people assemble in large number at Uthman's burning of the prescribed copies (of the Quran), and they were all pleased with his action; not a one spoke out against him". [34]
Ali ibn Abu Talib, the cousin of the Prophet and the fourth successor to the Prophet commented: "If I were in command in place of Uthman, I would have done the same". [35]
Of the copies made by Uthman, two still exist to our day. One is in the city of Tashkent, (Uzbekistan) and the second one is in Istanbul (Turkey). Below is a brief account of both these copies:
1. The copy which Uthman sent to Madina was reportedly removed by the Turkish authorities to Istanbul, from where it came to Berlin during World War I. The Treaty of Versailles, which concluded World War I, contains the following clause:
'Article 246: Within six months from the coming into force of the present Treaty, Germany will restore to His Majesty, King of Hedjaz, the original Koran of Caliph Othman, which was removed from Madina by the Turkish authorities and is stated to have been presented to the ex-Emperor William II". [36]
'This manuscript then reached Istanbul, but not Madina (Where it now resides)'. [37]
2. The second copy in existence is kept in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. 'It may be the Imam (master) manuscript or one of the other copies made at the time of Uthman'. [38]
It Came to Samarkand in 890 Hijra (1485) and remained there till 1868. Then it was taken to St.Petersburg by the Russians in 1869. It remained there till 1917. A Russian orientalist gave a detailed description of it, saying that many pages were damaged and some were missing. A facsimile, some 50 copies, of this mushaf (copy) was produced by S.Pisareff in 1905. A copy was sent to the Ottoman Sultan 'Abdul Hamid, to the Shah of Iran, to the Amir of Bukhara, to Afghanistan, to Fas and some important Muslim personalities. One copy is now in the Columbia University Library (U.S.A.). [39]
'The Manuscript was afterwards returned to its former place and reached Tashkent in 1924, where it has remained since'. [40]
Alhamdulilaah
Farid can you plz r remove anon Ymous from your channel? He’s here again. Jazakallah khairan
Your profile picture is really something
JazakAllah khair for this
Everytime i do rafa ul yadan, people call many things and give me many illogical advices..
Do dua for me to increase my sabr❤
Jay Smith need to see this video.
Sage of Synergism yhh and the pronunciation is of it is just a tad bit different. It’s like saying tomato and tomahto. Get life seriously coming to all these Islamic channels. Are people so useless these days. Maybe try and read your own scripture. Oh I forgot you can’t.
Do you even know the Arabic language to make a judgement.
You need to see jay Smith's video..
@Sage of Synergism and what's the wisdom behind him destroying the Qur'an. No arg u just repeating urself over again.
Ubayy b. Ka'b reported that the Messenger of Allah ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) was near the tank of Banu Ghifar that Gabriel came to him and said: Allah has commanded you to recite to your people the Qur'an in one dialect. Upon this he said: I ask from Allah pardon and forgiveness. My people are not capable of doing it. He then came for the second time and said: Allah has commanded you that you should recite the Qur'an to your people in two dialects. Upon this he (the Holy prophet) again said: I seek pardon and forgiveness from Allah, my people would not be able to do so. He (Gabriel) came for the third time and said: Allah has commanded you to recite the Qur'an to your people in three dialects. Upon this he said: I ask pardon and forgiveness from Allah. My people would not be able to do it. He then came to him for the fourth time and said: Allah has commanded you to recite the Qur'an to your people in seven dialects, and in whichever dialect they would recite, they would be right.
sahih muslim 1906
5 christians are very angry 😀
Wa ʿalaykum us-Salām wa-Raḥmatullāhi wa-Barakātuh
Salaam Br , Well Said & very Nice Explanation . May Allah bring Joy to ur Heart
Br Yahya from speaker corner