Whether "Recovery Evidence" by itself is Substantive Evidence: Justice V Ramkumar

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 11

  • @vishnujaware1139
    @vishnujaware1139 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks My lord Ramkumar for enlighten the real concept under 27 of EV Act

  • @khirodpoudyal6537
    @khirodpoudyal6537 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Greatly beneficial content sir. Gratitude sir.

  • @rajeshbhagat111
    @rajeshbhagat111 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot Sir... 🙏

  • @gatul6305
    @gatul6305 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One of the best channels for Indian students.. We can only be so grateful to u... U re service to the fraternity is amazing.. I wish u the very best

  • @salmanlaw309
    @salmanlaw309 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nobody can match the way in which Ramkumar Sir can explain a complex topic in such a easy way,his videos are to be treasured 😊

  • @faizaanqureshi7724
    @faizaanqureshi7724 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best law TH-cam channel

  • @abdulhakeem5038
    @abdulhakeem5038 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice lectures for enhancing knowledge and upliftment for new comers

  • @aviationuser
    @aviationuser ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Such a lucid and excellent explanation. Thanks to you Sir.

  • @premnathp156
    @premnathp156 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God father justice ramkumar

  • @chrisreay77
    @chrisreay77 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Respected sir very informative
    As pertaining to my case pw1
    Fabricated statment not relating to the case and section pw2 and pw3 falling under related witness also fabricated evidence without proof and not present at the scean of occurrence and mentioned wrong date and time and not at all present at the said spot and as police evidence not excepted thr pw3 accusing police vandalising the premises
    And suggetion are welcome
    Thank you sir

  • @gatul6305
    @gatul6305 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can't thank u enuf