Now, after this webinar by Justice Ramkumar, Section 27 is rather more comprehended than misconstrued, till the time another such Ramananda Nandlal Bharti verdict is pronounced😊
Justice ram sir persoective is biased to secure conviction and under the presumption that accused is guilty. Just think that police is always guilty and the necessity of Panchanama will arise
Dichotomy still lies, accused should be immune from self-incrimination and police/ investigation can not be taken as God qua planting of evidence conveniently implicating accused. However, evidence act also says that certain evidence within own knowledge has to be taken out from him only irrespective of its position but again accused is no-convict till he is proven guilty. Videography during discovery of incriminating material under advice of accused might be a good midpath to give right effect of sec 27 of EA
Excellent
Now, after this webinar by Justice Ramkumar, Section 27 is rather more comprehended than misconstrued, till the time another such Ramananda Nandlal Bharti verdict is pronounced😊
Sir,Just read ur article online, now I am watching ur video for more clarity😊Thank you. Research started from Kottaya case...
Distinctive dissection and display of Section 27 of Evidence Act.
Justice ram sir persoective is biased to secure conviction and under the presumption that accused is guilty. Just think that police is always guilty and the necessity of Panchanama will arise
Dichotomy still lies, accused should be immune from self-incrimination and police/ investigation can not be taken as God qua planting of evidence conveniently implicating accused. However, evidence act also says that certain evidence within own knowledge has to be taken out from him only irrespective of its position but again accused is no-convict till he is proven guilty. Videography during discovery of incriminating material under advice of accused might be a good midpath to give right effect of sec 27 of EA