In most of the courts, the Evidence Act is being diluted that is not a healthy atmosphere judiciary. My request your Lordship is to make this lecture as a subject/paper in Judicial Academy. Extraordinary session and a great salute to lordship. I request your Lordship to give more sessions on various other subjects also.
Case laws referred : 1. (2009) 15 SCC 200 2. AIR 1949 PC 278 3. AIR 1959 SC 31 4. 1991(1) KLT 861/ 1991(2) KLT 628 5. (1998) 7 SCC 337 6. AIR 2004 SC 960 7 AIR 2001 SC 318 presumption can't be drawn on the basis of another presumption, unless there is a statutory compulsion 8. (2006) 6 SCC 39 9.AIR 1979 SC 1848 10. (2009) 2 SCC 513 11. Noor Aga case (2008) 6 SCC 417 12. AIR 2009 SC 1518 13. AIR 1958 SC 61 14. (2015) 17 SCC 574 15. Kundanlal lallram vs Custodian Evacuees AIR 1961 SC 1316 16. AIR 2010 SC 898 17. AIR 2012 SC 2795 18. AIR 2017 SC 3859 19. HANIF KHAN VS CBI (2019) 4 RCR (CRI) 250 20. (2007) 6 SCC 711 21. Sanjay Datt case (1994) 5 SCC 410 22. AIR1966 SC 119 Followed IN AIR 1972 SC 922 23. (1994 ) 2 SCC 467 24. AIR 1962 SC 1808 (KATHI KALU OGHAD) 25. I WILL ADD OTHER SUBSEQUENTLY
"Semper necessity probandi incumbit ei qui agit" Latin maxim, it means " Necessity bof proof always lies with the person who lays charge. The legal concept of evidence is neither static not universal.
The Honourable Abraham Mathew, Justice of High Court, Kerala, being a Christian I wish to share with his permission about Hymn "There's fountain filled with drawn from Emmanuel's veins... while the " the dying thief on the cross pleaded to wash all my sins away....the response from the dying Christ on the Cross was "sin no more" implies that the plea of the dying thief accepted by the Christ and his sins were washed away., as per the Evidence Act.
Very good class, but be a little slow while referring to citations so that we May take down the citation. Name of the parties need not be referred. We can save some time on that count.
Sir,My charge framing not yet done in a CBI case but chargesheet filed since last 04 years. Am I under prosecution.pl.confirm as I am not being considered for promotion right now. Nooh raga case is for what purpose.
![[LiveLaw Practitioners Series] How to Contradict a Witness? - By Justice Abraham Mathew](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/35APBXcrErs/mqdefault.jpg)
![[LiveLaw Practitioners Series] How to Contradict a Witness? - By Justice Abraham Mathew](/img/tr.png)
Great.!!!
Thanks a lot
Really the Session was very much informative....The way of teaching is very nice...Thanks to Honble Sir for guiding us deeply.....
Excellent session... Really useful... Thank you Sir🙏
One of the best classes,
Abraham Mathew sir was an outstanding judge
Sir pranam and thank u for such a illumiating session
Outstanding presentation smooth flow of complicated issues
Very good sir
One of the most brilliant sessions ever.
Excellent And Enriching informative lecture And Discussion. Thank you very much.
Very informative and valuable session and worth to my practice
Thank you dear sir.
Thank you sir
very good..thnks
In most of the courts, the Evidence Act is being diluted that is not a healthy atmosphere judiciary. My request your Lordship is to make this lecture as a subject/paper in Judicial Academy. Extraordinary session and a great salute to lordship. I request your Lordship to give more sessions on various other subjects also.
Lordship's lecture is of immense useful..full of erudition,sc citations..thanks a lot
Super
Thanks sir. Thanks to the team of live law.
Please guide us on IPC topics .
Nice to see the Divine Mercy guiding the Learned legal luminary!!
Case laws referred :
1. (2009) 15 SCC 200
2. AIR 1949 PC 278
3. AIR 1959 SC 31
4. 1991(1) KLT 861/ 1991(2) KLT 628
5. (1998) 7 SCC 337
6. AIR 2004 SC 960
7 AIR 2001 SC 318 presumption can't be drawn on the basis of another presumption, unless there is a statutory compulsion
8. (2006) 6 SCC 39
9.AIR 1979 SC 1848
10. (2009) 2 SCC 513
11. Noor Aga case (2008) 6 SCC 417
12. AIR 2009 SC 1518
13. AIR 1958 SC 61
14. (2015) 17 SCC 574
15. Kundanlal lallram vs Custodian Evacuees AIR 1961 SC 1316
16. AIR 2010 SC 898
17. AIR 2012 SC 2795
18. AIR 2017 SC 3859
19. HANIF KHAN VS CBI (2019) 4 RCR (CRI) 250
20. (2007) 6 SCC 711
21. Sanjay Datt case (1994) 5 SCC 410
22. AIR1966 SC 119 Followed IN AIR 1972 SC 922
23. (1994 ) 2 SCC 467
24. AIR 1962 SC 1808 (KATHI KALU OGHAD)
25.
I WILL ADD OTHER SUBSEQUENTLY
Indeed a beautiful lecture
🙏🏻👏🏼
"Semper necessity probandi incumbit ei qui agit" Latin maxim, it means " Necessity bof proof always lies with the person who lays charge. The legal concept of evidence is neither static not universal.
Very informative session26.7.20
Krishnamachri book has been the best evidence book so far
good evening sir
Admission is made before court whereas confession is made before police or other agencies.
The Honourable Abraham Mathew, Justice of High Court, Kerala, being a Christian I wish to share with his permission about Hymn "There's fountain filled with drawn from Emmanuel's veins... while the " the dying thief on the cross pleaded to wash all my sins away....the response from the dying Christ on the Cross was "sin no more" implies that the plea of the dying thief accepted by the Christ and his sins were washed away., as per the Evidence Act.
Very good class, but be a little slow while referring to citations so that we May take down the citation. Name of the parties need not be referred. We can save some time on that count.
Sir please give us case laws details You referring here in links is my humble request
Hi iam advocate shivakumar
Sir,My charge framing not yet done in a CBI case but chargesheet filed since last 04 years. Am I under prosecution.pl.confirm as I am not being considered for promotion right now. Nooh raga case is for what purpose.