I’d like Stephanie Meyer to write more novellas about different covens at different points of history. I’d like to read one about the immortal children.
I doubt that will happen but she does plan on writing at least 2 more twilight books. One of them is Leah's book and the other one is in Reneeesme's point of view 4 years after breaking dawn
A vampire stuck in a child’s body with an adult mind would be worse for that vampire, a vampire stuck with a child’s mind and body would be worse for the people around them.
He also wanted Edward and Bella, especially Bella bc Bella was the only mind he couldn't read and new she had a powerful gift. Just wait until Aro finds out that Bella can project her shield where he can read her mind
I don't think he would go after her anymore if Bella really had made an im. Otherwise it might cause a poltical problem on himself and the whole vampiric world finds out.
He definitely wanted Edward and Bella very much after their introduction in New Moon, but it was Alice who was his ultimate conquest. Aro has never wanted a single vampire to add to his coven more than Alice. He has a similar power to Edward, so he doesn’t NEED him as much as he does Alice, although Edward is still highly coveted. She would make him virtually omniscient. This is believed to have somewhat changed at the end of breaking dawn when he witnessed the power of Bella’s mental shield which rendered his offensive psychic players totally useless and actually put the volturi at a disadvantage for the first time in history. Now he wants Alice AND Bella more than anything. Which gives him double the incentive he already had for wiping out the Cullens and taking them by force.
I think I know why vampires, mostly women ones made immortal children. They wanted a baby child of their own which they couldn't have. The one thing in any franchise doesn't talk about is what happens if someone with gentic defects was turned. For example, if someone that stops aging but maintains the mind of their true age (e.g. Esther from Orphan); or even a vice versa that speeds up, would they b cured and change to their true age in body or not. Dean, here a show with vampires for u to look into. Being Human. Both the UK and US version.
The concept of immortal children seems like the definition of an unfired Chekov’s gun. Imagine if instead of the child in question (whose name I’m definitely not refusing to name out of it being too damn silly) wasn’t just ok because reasons but was clearly on her way to being an immortal like those of legend. Isn’t that just an inherently more complicated and better story? Throughout all of Twilight, Bella has put herself and her own desires before anyone else, even when claiming to do otherwise. It’s always about what she wants and what’s best for her, sometimes even at the cost of her own life. She believed it was preferable that she die so her child could live. A noble and admirable sentiment in most cases of motherhood but most mothers do not know for certain their child will grow into unstoppable monsters. What if Bella did? What if she knew there was precisely zero way to avoid this fate for her daughter but she carried on anyway? What if she has to call into question whether what she wants is the best? What if they have to grapple with the moral question of if the Volturi are right? Isn’t it more interesting for them as characters to actually be motivated by a genuine concern for the welfare of all their species and not just spite and pettiness? Wouldn’t it be a far more complex, and far darker, end to the series of the girl who always gets what she wanted having to sacrifice the one person she loves more than anyone knowing she’s saving the world in the process because in spite of how much she loves her, Bella cannot change who she is? Not saying that’s for sure where the story should have gone but of all the choices Meyer could have made after introducing this concept, this would have been a significantly more interesting angle to go than “Yeah everyone’s wrong and she is just a miracle baby.”
I would’ve loved that in the books but I think Stephanie Meyer was writing and drawing inspiration based on her Mormon upbringing. After I found out she was Mormon, a lot of things started to make sense.
@@evilmerv4645that's stupid. What does her being mormon have to do with her writing that's like saying because JK Rowling is a transphobe, Happy Potter and therefore it's characters, are littered with transphobia. Anyone from any background can write a book, doesn't mean they put their own thoughts and opinions in it
@@leahscontemporary Correct, I’m pointing out that [Stupid name] could have had a much more profound thematic and character role in the story that would have made Bella a different, and much better, character.
How come that vampire kid in twilight we saw in the flashback on what happens if you create an immortal child didn't attack the horse that ran in front of him like I know vampires can survive on animal blood instead of human blood. But do they only have trouble being around an animal bleeding or not because they do have trouble being around a human bleeding. Or was that kid like just full from drinking a lot of blood already that he didn't bother going after that horse.
I want to say something very important. The definition of child is a human being below the age of puberty or a human being before the legal age of majority. According to the World History Encyclopedia, Jane would've been around the age of majority, while Alec was probably not, as marriage for boys at the earliest was 14, for the Byzantine Empire, applied to the whole of Europe. That's two whole years before Alec reaches the age of marriage. That probably makes Alec an Immortal Child, assuming age of earliest marriage is age of majority, which is probably the case because knowing what we know about the author, she'd probably do this. Also, we're never specified what exactly the older limits to Immortal Children are, so assuming 17 is the absolute eldest possibility for an Immortal child, since the law was probably instated during more modern times, not 813 AD, we can assume that Jane and Alec are probably considered a category I call "Immortal Teens", which are vampires turned at ages below the age of majority but are going through or just done puberty(Other known Twipires of this category are Edward Cullen, Benjamin, Tia, Bree, Diego, possibly the 18 year old vamps as well). One of the characteristics often found in this category of vamps is the inconsistency of their self control towards blood due to being hormone addled teenagers. Rant about the limits to an Immortal child over.
Well, not exactly, yes it's forbidden to make someone as young as 5 or 6 (Claudia for example) because having an 70+ year old mind in a small child's body would be torture emotionally but the punishment wasn't death the reason why Claudia was killed was because she tried to kill Lestat it's a crime for a vampire to kill another or even make an attempt also the Paris coven wanted Louis all to themselves and they wanted her out of the way. Twilight on the other hand is a different story
In the vampire Armand it gets so much worse because Armand was trying to cover up that he screwed up by cutting off Claudia's head essentially torturing her and trying to put it on the body of a vampire woman hence the torturing part as she was alive for all of this it didn't work out though. Poor girl even if she was sadistic she didn't deserve that.
I’d like Stephanie Meyer to write more novellas about different covens at different points of history. I’d like to read one about the immortal children.
I doubt that will happen but she does plan on writing at least 2 more twilight books. One of them is Leah's book and the other one is in Reneeesme's point of view 4 years after breaking dawn
This would be great
I honestly don't know what's worse, being stuck with a child's mentality, or being stuck in a child's body with an adult mentality.
Only full vamp children have that fate no dhampir like bella child the other dhampir alucard or blade they age than stop aging a certain age
Dhampir are half human half vampire were are aswell half werewolf half human children and well half vamp werwolf children exist in underworld
Or children who were bitten by a vamp are stuck into not age forever or vampire childrenwho were birthed by vampire two vamp
A vampire stuck in a child’s body with an adult mind would be worse for that vampire, a vampire stuck with a child’s mind and body would be worse for the people around them.
He also wanted Edward and Bella, especially Bella bc Bella was the only mind he couldn't read and new she had a powerful gift. Just wait until Aro finds out that Bella can project her shield where he can read her mind
I don't think he would go after her anymore if Bella really had made an im. Otherwise it might cause a poltical problem on himself and the whole vampiric world finds out.
He definitely wanted Edward and Bella very much after their introduction in New Moon, but it was Alice who was his ultimate conquest. Aro has never wanted a single vampire to add to his coven more than Alice. He has a similar power to Edward, so he doesn’t NEED him as much as he does Alice, although Edward is still highly coveted. She would make him virtually omniscient. This is believed to have somewhat changed at the end of breaking dawn when he witnessed the power of Bella’s mental shield which rendered his offensive psychic players totally useless and actually put the volturi at a disadvantage for the first time in history. Now he wants Alice AND Bella more than anything. Which gives him double the incentive he already had for wiping out the Cullens and taking them by force.
Bella Edward and ALICE... he really wanted Alice
I think I know why vampires, mostly women ones made immortal children. They wanted a baby child of their own which they couldn't have. The one thing in any franchise doesn't talk about is what happens if someone with gentic defects was turned. For example, if someone that stops aging but maintains the mind of their true age (e.g. Esther from Orphan); or even a vice versa that speeds up, would they b cured and change to their true age in body or not.
Dean, here a show with vampires for u to look into. Being Human. Both the UK and US version.
The Volturi’s 100% right to ban immortal children. Being forever frozen at that age, never able to learn, and all they know is ‘I’m hungry’.
Please do a video about the real werewolves of twilight called the children of the moon. They were feared by the volturi
I wish we would have more information about them. They sound like they could be quite interesting
They are more like van hellsing Werewolf and this in underworld the others we know as huge wolfs are only shapeshifter we saw
The once you Talk about look like mix of Wolf human two legged Walk
The concept of immortal children seems like the definition of an unfired Chekov’s gun.
Imagine if instead of the child in question (whose name I’m definitely not refusing to name out of it being too damn silly) wasn’t just ok because reasons but was clearly on her way to being an immortal like those of legend. Isn’t that just an inherently more complicated and better story? Throughout all of Twilight, Bella has put herself and her own desires before anyone else, even when claiming to do otherwise. It’s always about what she wants and what’s best for her, sometimes even at the cost of her own life. She believed it was preferable that she die so her child could live. A noble and admirable sentiment in most cases of motherhood but most mothers do not know for certain their child will grow into unstoppable monsters. What if Bella did? What if she knew there was precisely zero way to avoid this fate for her daughter but she carried on anyway? What if she has to call into question whether what she wants is the best? What if they have to grapple with the moral question of if the Volturi are right? Isn’t it more interesting for them as characters to actually be motivated by a genuine concern for the welfare of all their species and not just spite and pettiness? Wouldn’t it be a far more complex, and far darker, end to the series of the girl who always gets what she wanted having to sacrifice the one person she loves more than anyone knowing she’s saving the world in the process because in spite of how much she loves her, Bella cannot change who she is?
Not saying that’s for sure where the story should have gone but of all the choices Meyer could have made after introducing this concept, this would have been a significantly more interesting angle to go than “Yeah everyone’s wrong and she is just a miracle baby.”
I would’ve loved that in the books but I think Stephanie Meyer was writing and drawing inspiration based on her Mormon upbringing. After I found out she was Mormon, a lot of things started to make sense.
@@evilmerv4645that's stupid. What does her being mormon have to do with her writing that's like saying because JK Rowling is a transphobe, Happy Potter and therefore it's characters, are littered with transphobia. Anyone from any background can write a book, doesn't mean they put their own thoughts and opinions in it
I don't think you understand the lore or book. That's not the point of Renesmee. And your version if Bella seems out of character
@@leahscontemporary Correct, I’m pointing out that [Stupid name] could have had a much more profound thematic and character role in the story that would have made Bella a different, and much better, character.
@Longshanks1690 well your understanding of better might only apply to you so🤷🏿♀️
we need to have a tv series about these kids
I found it a bit ironic that Alec and Jane was just 13 or 12 while changed by Aro. But I know it was needed to save them from the witch execution.
do more of the vampire Chronicles, immortal children there’s quite a few
Loads more vampire chronicles on the way
Kind of reminds me of Claudia from Interview with the Vampire.
This was Truly Incredible Masterpiece Video for The Immortal Children from The Twilight Franchise.
How come that vampire kid in twilight we saw in the flashback on what happens if you create an immortal child didn't attack the horse that ran in front of him like I know vampires can survive on animal blood instead of human blood. But do they only have trouble being around an animal bleeding or not because they do have trouble being around a human bleeding. Or was that kid like just full from drinking a lot of blood already that he didn't bother going after that horse.
idk what it is, but I love your narration voice. It's just perfect for this. #commentforthealgorithm
it is always sad when something bad happned ro kids
I want to say something very important. The definition of child is a human being below the age of puberty or a human being before the legal age of majority. According to the World History Encyclopedia, Jane would've been around the age of majority, while Alec was probably not, as marriage for boys at the earliest was 14, for the Byzantine Empire, applied to the whole of Europe. That's two whole years before Alec reaches the age of marriage. That probably makes Alec an Immortal Child, assuming age of earliest marriage is age of majority, which is probably the case because knowing what we know about the author, she'd probably do this. Also, we're never specified what exactly the older limits to Immortal Children are, so assuming 17 is the absolute eldest possibility for an Immortal child, since the law was probably instated during more modern times, not 813 AD, we can assume that Jane and Alec are probably considered a category I call "Immortal Teens", which are vampires turned at ages below the age of majority but are going through or just done puberty(Other known Twipires of this category are Edward Cullen, Benjamin, Tia, Bree, Diego, possibly the 18 year old vamps as well). One of the characteristics often found in this category of vamps is the inconsistency of their self control towards blood due to being hormone addled teenagers. Rant about the limits to an Immortal child over.
Another great video
The immortal children of Twilight had the same fate as the immortal children from The Vampire Chronicles... Death
Well, not exactly, yes it's forbidden to make someone as young as 5 or 6 (Claudia for example) because having an 70+ year old mind in a small child's body would be torture emotionally but the punishment wasn't death the reason why Claudia was killed was because she tried to kill Lestat it's a crime for a vampire to kill another or even make an attempt also the Paris coven wanted Louis all to themselves and they wanted her out of the way. Twilight on the other hand is a different story
@@AylaNoelleLee tru
In the vampire Armand it gets so much worse because Armand was trying to cover up that he screwed up by cutting off Claudia's head essentially torturing her and trying to put it on the body of a vampire woman hence the torturing part as she was alive for all of this it didn't work out though. Poor girl even if she was sadistic she didn't deserve that.
@@jennyblanch8241 oh yea I forgot about that part of the book. I wish they had put it in the movie or the new TV show at least.
I thought they were called “Amortal” children. All vampires are pretty much Immortal with an “I”…given their abilities and such. Idk…
You just answered your own inquiry…lol yes theyre called Immortal children with an I. Because theyre immortal
He wants her to join him Bella power