I have a 10x42 binocular and an 8x42 binocular, both from the same brand and model, and I can say with absolute certainty that the 8x42 is the better one. It provides greater eye comfort, has a wider field of view, and the difference in magnification between them is not so noticeable.
Yes but if you like to observe birds on an open field or shy animals like deers eating i think more magnification can make you enjoy the scene better even if overall you have a lesser depth and movement overall ease of use
Years ago I bought my first “good” binoculars, a used pair of 8x42 Leicas at a birding store, after the two very nice and very knowledgeable ladies working behind the counter told me I would actually be able to see more with 8x binos than 10x. I’ve become a believer, and I’m still using those Leicas 20+ years later.
Hi Jason - yes this is a good point. With binoculars especially it does pay to buy the best you can afford in the beginning as unlike electronic devices and digital cameras, they do go out of date and become redundant after a year or so...
Excellent explanation of the differences between 8x42 and 10x42. I was leaning towards purchasing the 10x42 simply because of the greater magnification, but now after watching your video, I think I will go with the 8x42 because they will fit my purposes much better. Thank you!
I love how all your videos are so well introduced! 'And we're going to start RIGHT NOW!'. Also the use of 'specific needs are requirements' and 'however'. For some reason this brings me so much joy. Anyway - thanks for your help - very informative across the channel in helping me choose my first premium binocs (vortex vipers 8 x 42).
Hello Aimee. Many thanks for your very kind words and your words of encouragement it really means a lot and it's awesome to know that I'm bringing someone so much joy just with these crazy videos! Anyway you're welcome in regards to me helping you find a pair of binoculars. the vortex viper 8x 42 I like and are a very good choice. I would really like to hear once you've had a chance to use them just how they turn out for you thanks again cheers Jason
@@Bestbinocularsreviews You're welcome. May i ask a question about a binocular choice ? I'm doing a lot of outdoor camping and fishing, hiking, and long distance bicycle trip. I found myself interested in wildife, especially birds, so i wanted to purchase my first binoculars. After reading a lot of information, I have chosen to buy the "Nikkon prostaff 7s" but i'm hesitating a lot between the "8x42" and the compact "8x30" wich is lighter (-230g) and smaller. Do you think there is a big difference between the two in terms of image quality between the two ? Thank you !
Just watched your video. Just purchased an 8x42 for hubby for father's day. We like to have a pair for travel. I was worried about my choice. I went with the 8x42 because they seemed more compact than the 10x42. Glad to see many posts here that love their 8x42.
Hi Terri thanks for the comment - an 8x42 will be the same size as the 10x42 from the same series ... 42 is the diameter of the lenses in millimetres and 8x or 10x is the magnification and has nothing to do with size.. I have a video you should watch: What the binocular numbers mean: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/binocular-numbers-mean-12/ There are also a bunch of 101 guides here that I suggest you take a look at: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/guides/
Hi there - thanks for the comment and yes, 8x42 binoculars will often have more eye-relief than the 10x42 version, which usually makes them easier and better for eyeglass wearers. I am glad to know I helped you - all the best.
Thanks BBR man. I would have leant to 10x had I not done my research. Now I'm definitely going to 8x42. You were very clear with your info so I was happy to hit the like button and comment.
I want to get some binoculars for my mother, who wants to view the mountain range visible from her living room. So far, I think a 8×42 might suit her better as she will have a harder time than most keeping the binoculars steady, so a lower magnification would still allow her to maintain focus on an area. She also plans on using them in low light conditions such as sunrise and sunset. Not sure if I will go for 42mm objective lenses, but I appreciate this informative video very much!
Hi, thanks for the comment and kind words, much appreciated. I agree, an 8x would be better for someone with unsteady hands - you could go for a smaller more lightweight binocular, so something like an 8x32 (see ones I have reviewed here tinyurl.com/5ka5tw59 ) which would also be easier to handle, but would then reduce the low light capability.
Get your mother a pair of bushnell 8x42 bonculars very good in low light I own a pair just amazing glass in any condition.
3 หลายเดือนก่อน
Someone should have mentioned using a tripod and a higher magnification. Handheld is good for moving objects but a mountain range is hardly ever going to be moving around…
Now I feel like I need more than one pair as I am sometimes watching birds in the woods, and other times watching birds at a distance on large bodies of water! But, at least I now understand the differences. Thank you for your very easy-to-understand explanations!
I have both a 8x42 and 10x42. You're not going to see any appreciable increase in bird detail at a distance with 10x binos than you're seeing with 8x. Yes, the birds will be ever so slightly bigger in the 10x, but it will only be noticeable if you look through the 8x and 10x back to back. If you're frequently looking at shore birds or birds at a distance, you're gonna want to consider a spotting scope to pair with your 8x binos
Hola! -Como dice Kenny (gracias a el por este gran video) considere que si vd observa con buena luz, los 10x40 son buenos. -Si vd tiene buen pulso, los 10x40 son buenos -Si además observa a media distancia los 10x40 son buenos. -Pero si va por zonas cerradas, de poca luz, o le tiembla el pulso los 8x40 son buenos. Dudo sea interesante tener dos herramientas bastante parecidas. Mejor disponer este dinero en un solo aparato que vd se siente mejor
@@mikecurtis1111 I was considering to buy an 10x , but i already have a very good Swaro NL Pure 8x42. Its not worth to get an extra 10 power like 10x32 or 10x42?
As an eyeglass user and one who birds a lot I look for 10x42 that offer a lot of eye relief, typically more than 20mm. I currently own Pentax with a 21mm eye relief and really love these binoculars which are not inexpensive but less than half the cost of truly high end binoculars like Leica
I actually have one of each, 8x and 10x. And, depending on what I’m going to be looking at/for, choose between. If I’m hunting and need to see far out, I use a spotting scope. I used to try big, bulky , multi power binos to do it all, it was a big fail.
Hi yes, I agree with you - having both an 8x and 10x binocular is ideal and as you say, for most uses MUCH better than having most Zoom or variable magnification binoculars that in almost all cases cant match the quality or performance of a fixed focus binocular (see why here: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/zoom-binoculars.php ) . However, not everyone can afford or indeed may want to have two binoculars, and thus a choice has to be made.
i do think 8x is the best all rounder, sometimes i find 10x too narrow and i know there are wider FOV in 10x than the ones i used but there is also the shaky image thats very noticeable when increasing magnification
I'm a hunter and I do most of my hunting at early dawn and late dusk. My personal choice is a pair of Nikon Monarch 7×50. They cost me $120. I find the exit pupil to be very good and it has a nice field of view. There very good in low light conditions and it's all the magnification I need. The down side is they are big and heavy but for the price and performance I can't really complain.
I really do like the 7x50 configuration as well - for both terrestrial uses and looking at the stars, one of my favorites and you are right, with such a large exit pupil, you don't HAVE to spend tons of money as it can makes up for lower quality glass and coatings: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/7x50-binoculars-for-astronomy-04/
Thats true, but most when you have a full dilating pupil of 7mm. When you get older, and you pupils flex less, 8x42 is equally effective with dark adapted eyes.
Hi , I have got 2 pairs, an 8x25 and a 10x42 bushnell waterproof h2o, I use the Minolta 8x25 when out walking, but live using the 10x42 when on the north east coast of Great Britain , as you say, very crisp and clear, had both pairs for years, and still very nice to use, lovely video and very clear and informative, even for a veteran birder, keep it up, Kenny
Hi Kenneth, Many thanks for the feedback and kind words, much appreciated - a compact 8x25 with a full size 10x42 is a great combination to have and as you say will cover most needs and uses perfectly.
Good video! I agree about that 8x42 is a better allround choice. Wider FOV, brighter image in low light, less shaky image and easier eye placement. 10x42 is more of a special task choice.
Very helpful. Feeling much better about the purchase I just made. I just bought my wife some binos for Christmas, which she'll use to watch birds and other critters behind our house. I was going to get 10x42 but they were out of stock. I got the 8x42 (same brand/model). Now, I think she'll actually be happier with the binos I "settled for."
Nice to have both 8x and 10x I own 8x42 10x36 10x50 12x50 and 7x50wide. 8x42 my favorite for wildlife birding.12x50 harder to hold steady but great long distance views with tripod or 15x70 for astronomy
Hi Yes, having both is ideal, I agree, but not for everyone - It just depends on how much you want to spend and how often you use your binoculars - so most people probablu only want one instrument - in which case it is very important to get the best configuration for your specific needs / preferences.
I knew all of this , but decided to watch your clip anyway. I am in the market and wanted to be sure that I wasn't overlooking anything, but I am now confident that my decision on what to buy will be the best one I can make. Thank you , very well done!
While this video has been out since Oct of 2019 I have only recently viewed it. Everything you said is spot on. I have my trusty 8x42 Vortex for yrs and wanted to upgrade. I jumped right out and bought 12x50, WOW, what a mistake. Everything you said about the differences is very accurate. The 12x50 were surprisingly difficult to control the shaking. I got lucky that the dealer I bought the 12x50 from agreed to exchange the 12x50 for 8x42 even after the 30 day exchange window had passed. The new 8x42 will do what I am looking for and they are of better quality and yes more money. I don't have them as of this writing, they are in the mail as they say. I love my first set of 8x42 Vortex so after speaking with the sales person about what I wanted to achieve, I am sure I bought the right binocular, with the improvements I was looking for. Keep making these videos, You do speak the truth!
Hi Robert, Many thanks for the kind words and great feedback. Yes it is true, for most general use, something like an 8x42 is ideal. I personally can hold a 12x50 still for short periods, but everyone is different and even so, there is little doubt that high powered binoculars are best used with a tripod in-order to appreciate the extra detail. All the best and please let us know how you get on with the 8x42 - which series did you choose?
Been using 10x42 Zeiss for years but broke them, just got a new pair of Athlon 8x42s. Primary use is hunting and especially important to have good light transmission during dawn and dusk. Haven’t tested them much yet but they seem really good. My dad has used a pair of 7x42s for decades and they are wonderful for hunting.
Thank you for helping me to decide. After almost making a spontaneous in-store purchase from someone who didn't know anything about lenses but let us try half a dozen pairs that really didn't work for us, your video steered me to a different store with the right choice. Thank you for explaining the broader field of view - that's what I want. Also the low light conditions. The moment I tried them I knew they were perfect! My son and I have very different facial (his eyes are wider set, the bridge of his nose broader and flatter than mine) and focal (he's nearsighted and I'm far-sighted) structures, but we were both able to say "wow, these are the ones". Looking forward to wildlife (and maybe even Jupiter! ) with our new Nikon Prostaff 7S 8 x 42s :) Someday I'll buy that $2000 telescope I really want, hahaha. But these come in way under budget and with 2 very happy customers. Thank you.
Hi Lisa, Welcome to the world of binoculars - I am really glad to have been able to help also many thanks for the feedback and kind words it is very much appreciated.
for general purpose my go to is a tasco sierra essentials 10x42, that range is ther best balance i have seen between power and keeping them steady, i have a compact pair of bushnell 8x42s that i use when i do shed or mushroom hunting, very handy! i also love the twist up eyecups since i just got glasses and they are now a must have on any binos i get, i used to have a pair of 12x50 in the that same set but i let a friend borrow it and it was returned broken in half after, apparently being stepped on, haven't been able to find a pair of those anywhere!
Thanks for sharing your insight. Your clear explanation of facts wasn't colored by personal opinion. Sharing quantifiable information and inviting the viewer to decide what would be best for them is a fabulous approach! I appreciate your excellent production values that enhanced the presentation. Kudos to you!
Great video, I agree with most of it. My preference is a leupold bx-4 8x42, but I also have an old Otsuka japan 7x35 porro that I use too. Pros and cons to both. One thing not mentioned is wind. I find for windy conditions image stability can be difficult, so my preference is for 8x and 7x. The other thing is thermal heat waves and smog/hazy conditions over long range landscapes. I have found increased magnification of a hazy or thermal blurry image less desirable. So again 8-7x is my preference.
You make some excellent points and whilst often very minor, you are right, the weather (other than light) can have a bearing on which binoculars would be best under those conditions
Thanks for such a helpful video !!! I've recently started birdwatching and was tempted to buy a pair of Adasion 12x42 as it was on sale. After watching reading guides and seeing this video, I'm relieved I didn't rush and buy it.
Hi, thanks for the feedback and am glad to have helped. Yes, for most birding an 8x42 is a good option. For long-range and out in the open, like fields, at the coast, or other waterfronts a 10x42 can be better. For very long range, you could go for a 12x, but I would then also suggest getting a pair with larger objectives (like 50mm) to make sure you still get a decent low light performance. If you are interested here are some 12x50 binocular reviews on BBR: snip.ly/upg9i5
Very useful information. I’ve actually got a pair of each. I’m a birder with a pair of each. Now I can decide which to use based on the situation. 8x for woods birding, 10x for waterfowl at beaches and marshes. Thanks.
I use a combination of Opticron Discovery WP PC 10x50, plus Opticron Discovery WP PC 8x42, plus Celestron Granite 8x42 bino's. A good range of prices from around £180 - £200 for the Opticrons (depending on size and current pricing) and about £300 when purhased for the Celestron Granite (which have gone up in price since purchase about 4 years ago) The Opticrons are very good quality indeed when compared too the Celestron Granite and I would say the better bargain, as they can cost up to half the price of the Celestron. The Opticron 8x42 is very good for close up bird watching, but looses out a little for longer distance viewing of details too the bigger 10x50 model, as you would expect of course. The Opticron 10x50 is a narrower field of view to both of the other bino's (a little) but not in a major way that is as obvious as you might imagine. You gain with the 10x power over the 8x power, but loose a little even with the 50mm aperture. Again, just as you would expect. If I had to choose only one set of bino's however, I would go for the 10x50 Opticron's. This would be down to their higher power for longer distances (rambling and general use etc) and their very good performance optically (a real bargain at their current price of around £200) plus they work well for short distance aswell, especially if you are looking at a small target that doesn't move around with big movements anyway. Like a bird feeding in (mostly) one spot. Or maybe birds feeding off a seed feeder, so the target position is basically fixed anyway. Given a choice of TWO bino's, the Celestron Granite's take some beating for quality of the optics and build, but the Opticron 8x42 give it a very, VERY good run for the money, especially as one is half the price of the other. I would be very happy with both Opticrons only, if I hadn't bought the Celestron bino first. Indeed, I bought the Opticron 8x42 as a second bino, so as not to possibly damage the much more expensive Celestron Granite while travelling, imagine my surprise when I found out how good the Opticron 8x42 bino was on first try. I bought the 10x50 Opticron for that little further reach to see things that bit further away. while the image quality is the same as the smaller 8x power version (both are excellent) and is my 'go-to' for most things now.
Hi Zaber, that is Excellent, welcome to the world of Binoculars! Let me know what you got and how you find using them after you have had some time with them
Went to Cabellas to try 8x42 and 10x42 of the same model. Walked away with 8x42 because I wear prescription glasses and 8x42 had less strain on my eyes. I had a better experience with 8x42.
Thanks for the high quality videos and reviews . As a glass fetishist of 35 yrs[photographer] I’m loving you’re binocular material. Cheers mark Australia
Excellent comparison! My goto is a 10x42 Bushnell Engage excellent all purpose binos. I can comfortably hold a 15x70 for astronomy so the 10x is my choice all day.
The Engage series from Bushnell looks to be really good. How do you find them optically? Unfortunately I have not been able to test them as I have never had a reply back from Bushnell :-(
@@Bestbinocularsreviews hey Jason optically they are very good optics, color accuracy is spot on, sharp from the centre to about 85% and the same goes vertically. My favourite thing about them is size and comfort. They also had decent eye relief. Optically I cannot fault them on par with my vortex viper HD 8x42 but better FOV and ER.
I am not a newbie and it was a delight to follow your clear and concise language and explanation. Been fascinated by optics since childhood and would you credt it? I was Reg'd blind at 45. No matter, Retinitis Pigmentosa or tunnel vision to the layman. I have optics for all seasons, small monoculars for railway station/airports information boards going to 8x30 monocular for weight saving or my 8x30 binos if not. I have 8x42's and 10x50's. I go on the hill or around the coast using the old 3 legged stool and a photographers monopod as a walking pole and at stop times I attach my binos. No longer young this makes a serious difference to hand shake and I can sit, take my ease and look for birds and wildlife. Best Wishes, McIntyre, Scotland.
That's interesting how binoculars work. I have an 8x25 monocular because I like how more compact it is than binoculars. My grandfather had a 35X70 binoculars, and they are huge.
70mm binoculars are very big and usually very heavy, plus the 35x magnification is massive - to get the best out of those you really do need to have them mounted onto a tripod. For more on this and why, check out my guide to high power, long range binoculars: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/high-powered-long-distance-viewing-binoculars.php as well as my guide to tripods for binoculars: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/binocular-accessories.php
First Pair or General Purpose. 8x all the way. The field of view will be important you’ll get used to targeting objects easily especially if it’s a bird. If your buying compacts 8x. Boating 8x. Mariners actually use 8 or less. When things start moving it’s field of view. So starting with 8x is usually safer if your unsure. 10x is kinda the standard but that’s changed so much. The 8x lens although is more of your general purpose all around lens. Anything 10 or more you start narrowing down its uses but increasing the magnification. Compacts will suffer from lower light conditions as you’ll see 8x21 and 8x25 vs 10x25 meaning the exit Pupil Diameter will be much less than 3mm in some cases. So in that case the lower Magnification may be more appreciated in low light on a compact. A compact isn’t really all that useful at higher magnifications anyways. You ever hand a person a pair of binoculars and they say I can’t see anything. It’s usually due to the fact they don’t use them and can’t target objects easily. Then you point and you turn them and say it’s right their and then the moments gone. 🤣. This is where 8x will come in handy as well vs the 10x. Having the detail is great especially if your somebody who knows how to use binoculars. It’s going to miserable for the person that doesn’t. So going with an 8x can be that much more helpful. Theirs a purpose for all of them but in general that’s my opinion. Their are other sizes as well. But as he said anything more than 10x tripod. Anything less than 8x you may have shakey hands or it’s a baseball game. The 8x vs 10x battle. Some companies actually make a 9x due to the debate.
Hi Kristopher. Many thanks for the feedback and your excellent observations and I 100% agree with you, those new to binoculars should if possible keep the magnification to a minimum and is one of the main points I bang on BBR. eg: Avoid These Biggest Mistakes Newbies Make When Choosing Binoculars www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/biggest-mistakes-newbies-make-when-choosing-binoculars-02/
There MUST be a reason why 8x40s are still made by every manufacturer. Every fibre of one's being says that 10 has simply got to be better than 8, right? However...
Hi, Glad it was helpful and many thanks for the feedback - it is much appreciated. Please let me know how you go with your new purchase once you have had some time to use them.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Sadly those Lieca 8x20s never turned up. Thankfully I managed to get my money back as I got them through Amazon. I don't think the company actually ever had them in the first place as they kept putting off sending them out. I have tried/borrowed a pair since and for the size they are excellent
Good video but I feel you left out one very important factor , Eye Fatigue , the higher magnification will produce more eye fatigue , I have several pairs and in different powers but for everyday use and my leave on the seat of my truck I prefer a High Definition 8 power, I like a higher power for short intervals for a closer look but that's all, give me my 8's if I'm going to be looking through them for any period of time ..........
Great point! Yes you are right, there is no doubt that a lower powered binocular is far more relaxing on the eyes to use than a high powered one. I think this is partly/mostly to do with the increased image shake you get with higher magnifications and your brain & eyes trying to compensate for it. Mounting your binoculars onto something like a tripod does help with this, but not always practical.
I have a pair of Vortex 8x42 Crossfire HD that I use for squirrel hunting, because that is basically (but not always) their purpose I didn't want to go with the 10x42 because if the shake factor. And have had no issues with them the few times I have used them outside of squirrel hunting, actually was using them to glass some bald eagles in the area around 300 yards off and as long as I held them against a tree they worked perfectly fine....great info that's!
Been birding in tropical jungle conditions for a couple of months now. I've had it good with a 10x42 so far. Not as wide a field of view as an 8x42, but I can manage well enough for the combination of low light understory and tracking small birds that are closer up, like Flowerpeckers, and then looking at a pair of hornbills on some taller treetops that are farther, or a raptor gliding midair. The extra 2x difference does make up the distance that you can't pull in as much with an 8x. That being said though, I have also gone ahead and gotten an angled spotting scope with 25x to cover much farther birds.
I'm thinking of getting into birdwatching and your review was first class thanks. I wasn't sure what the magnification numbers meant for the field of vision. So i was very unsure which magnification would be best for me so your review helped a great deal with the details you went into so it has made my choice far easier I'll opt for the 8×42 binoculars. Thanks 👍
Excellent explanation for someone who knew nothing about the difference between the 8x42 and 10x42. Your final conclusion was also very informative as it gave examples of who would use each one. As a hiker you made my mind up which one. (yes the 10x42) WELL DONE
All birders in Ecuador used 8x42. Celestron have great affordables options for this niche. You could also invest on a harnas, it makes a huge difference when birding on the forest👌
Yes, 8x42's are generally considered ideal for birders and yes a bino harness can help - comfort and free up your hands: Binocular Harness Guide www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/binocular-harness.php
OK this helped me decide to go for 8x! Now I still need to choose between the Hawke Endurance ED 8x42 mono or the Vortex Solo 8x36 mono, as a compact hiking/camping tool 😅
It's not as easy as it sounds. I have a 8x25 which is brighter than my other 10x50. Everything depends on how good is the glass and coating. Also i have a 10x42 that gives a more steady image than my 8x25. The 10x42 gives a wider view.
Thank you so much, great video to really understand how things works!., now i need to decide today or max. tomorrow which one to get......, the Nikon Monarch HG 8x42 or the Nikon Monarch 10x42., mainly for some safaris in Africa sometimes or just walking around in some forrest, National Parks or coastlines., i had previous an Steiner Observer 10x42....was ok but i want a better one and theNikon Monarch HG looks very good and has some great reviews.....i try yesterday in a shop the Steiner Ranger xtreme , both , the 8x42 and 10x42 and finally i see the difference with some vibration when trying to hold for a while on some objects on the 10x42 and much better on the 8x42 and also more light......but i like the idea of having more reach with 10x42....going soon t south Africa for 2 weeks holidays, maily to coastline....do you think for this is better the 10x42....? and for Safaris also the 10x42....?., and finally for birds.....anyway, thank you so much and just subscribed.Best regards
I think for uses near the coast and on general safari, a 10x42 is a great option - usually plenty of light and wide open spaces. If however you tend to do a lot of birding whilst on safari and or a lot of very early morning or evening drives/walks, then you perhaps would rather opt for the 8x42 configuration instead.
Great video you covered a lot of my questions and explained everything very well. I got a pair of cheap 70 mm binos with a 12 to 60 zoom. The zoom is a challenge because it changes the focus and I find the need to refocus both eyes each time. So you need to set the zoom and focus and leave it there. You can't zoom in effectively and get focused and you need a concrete or cast iron base to mount the thing on to reduce shake. I'm looking for a machine stand from a drill press maybe..
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Decided to buy 8x40, because usually I'm gonna use binocular into the woods and hilly terrain to admire landscapes, also during sunset sometimes. Not often on vast and open spaces. I think I'll probably go for Nikon Action EX. Regards!
Hi Nico, many thanks for the feedback and kind words, much appreciated - sorry for the late response - I have been a ill recently - Hope your 8x42's worked out for you - what did you end up getting?
It's easier to hold the 8x42 than a 10x42 un less you use a tri pod , a 10x42 and a 8x42that what I use bushnell 8x42 it's very nice field of view very good in low light conditions like your review very much thankyou
Hi Tony, many thanks for the feedback and kind words and yes for sure, it is easier to keep the image shake free on a lower powered binocular like an 8x42.
I bought a pair of 8x42mm roof prism binoculars because everything that I read at the time said 8x is the "best" general purpose binoculars. But I had my reservations. After 2 weeks with the 8x42mm, I wish I had bought the 10x42mm. I still have the 8x42mm because i paid less than $200 for a $500 pair of binoculars on Black Friday, but I don’t use them as often as my 10x42mm.
If you're a hunter and not extreme long range, 8X42 is the best and one with quality HD lenses will suffice. You get the broadest field of view within non-extreme shooting ranges, you can still see really far with it and you won't cry a river if you damage- or loose it, as you probably would if you loose a classy ED-unit at 2-3X the cost. That easily happens when hunting - especially in rugged terrain. Meopta has a fantastic 8X42 with flouride-HD lenses, the Optika HD. Perhaps review it? I think it's the absolute top in the price bracket (but I would still cry, if I lost it!). The Leupold BX-2 Alpine is also a very good candidate. Bird-watching? Get an ED unit for that final accuracy in the representation of the observed and a 10X42 to get a bit closer to the little fella too. Of course, if budget is not an issue, ED is the superior choice in all use cases.
Great videos. My problem is that I am in the forest area and the coast! Ideally I need 3 pairs. 8x32 for hiking and travel, 8x42 and I want the 10x42 for the coast. Would also use them for stargazing!
I have a 10x42 binocular and an 8x42 binocular, both from the same brand and model, and I can say with absolute certainty that the 8x42 is the better one. It provides greater eye comfort, has a wider field of view, and the difference in magnification between them is not so noticeable.
So its not worth to buy both? 8x42 NL Pure AND 10x42? I have already 8x, but curious to 10x But i will use 8x the most
Yes but if you like to observe birds on an open field or shy animals like deers eating i think more magnification can make you enjoy the scene better even if overall you have a lesser depth and movement overall ease of use
This video is by far the most comprehensive and easy to understand explanation on binoculars that I have seen.
Hi TS - Many thanks for the feedback and nice words - much appreciated!
Thanks for your English, easily understandable even for the foreign listeners.
You are welcome - and thanks for the feedback - much appreciated :-)
Finaly - a intelligent Man who knows how to show the performanses.
Thank you.
You are welcome and many thanks for the kind words
Years ago I bought my first “good” binoculars, a used pair of 8x42 Leicas at a birding store, after the two very nice and very knowledgeable ladies working behind the counter told me I would actually be able to see more with 8x binos than 10x. I’ve become a believer, and I’m still using those Leicas 20+ years later.
Hi Jason - yes this is a good point. With binoculars especially it does pay to buy the best you can afford in the beginning as unlike electronic devices and digital cameras, they do go out of date and become redundant after a year or so...
@@Bestbinocularsreviews so right!
Im about to go buy some used 10year old zeiss ht for $1300. Im hoping they are still perfect internally
And hope they last me a lifetime.
@@CHAD-RYAN Did you buy them?
Excellent explanation of the differences between 8x42 and 10x42. I was leaning towards purchasing the 10x42 simply because of the greater magnification, but now after watching your video, I think I will go with the 8x42 because they will fit my purposes much better. Thank you!
I've been watching a few videos on binoculars and this was the one that helped me finally make my decision! I'm off to order my Barr & Stroud 8x42s.
When I started birdwatching, 50 years ago, I bought a good 8x40 binocular. I still have it, and I have never thought I made the wrong choice.
I love how all your videos are so well introduced! 'And we're going to start RIGHT NOW!'. Also the use of 'specific needs are requirements' and 'however'. For some reason this brings me so much joy. Anyway - thanks for your help - very informative across the channel in helping me choose my first premium binocs (vortex vipers 8 x 42).
Hello Aimee. Many thanks for your very kind words and your words of encouragement it really means a lot and it's awesome to know that I'm bringing someone so much joy just with these crazy videos! Anyway you're welcome in regards to me helping you find a pair of binoculars. the vortex viper 8x 42 I like and are a very good choice. I would really like to hear once you've had a chance to use them just how they turn out for you thanks again cheers Jason
Not only your explanations are very informative and synthetic, but as a non-English native speaker I also appreciate your very clear diction.
Thank you for the feedback and kind words, it is much appreciated.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews You're welcome. May i ask a question about a binocular choice ?
I'm doing a lot of outdoor camping and fishing, hiking, and long distance bicycle trip.
I found myself interested in wildife, especially birds, so i wanted to purchase my first binoculars.
After reading a lot of information, I have chosen to buy the "Nikkon prostaff 7s" but i'm hesitating a lot between the "8x42" and the compact "8x30" wich is lighter (-230g) and smaller.
Do you think there is a big difference between the two in terms of image quality between the two ?
Thank you !
Just watched your video. Just purchased an 8x42 for hubby for father's day. We like to have a pair for travel. I was worried about my choice. I went with the 8x42 because they seemed more compact than the 10x42. Glad to see many posts here that love their 8x42.
Hi Terri thanks for the comment - an 8x42 will be the same size as the 10x42 from the same series ... 42 is the diameter of the lenses in millimetres and 8x or 10x is the magnification and has nothing to do with size.. I have a video you should watch: What the binocular numbers mean: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/binocular-numbers-mean-12/ There are also a bunch of 101 guides here that I suggest you take a look at: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/guides/
I stopped to worry about my 8x42 choice, thank you!
Hi Pavel, you are most welcome - as I say in the video, for many users, a high magnification is less important than many of the other factors.
Very good - the comment on watching with glasses made me chose 8x42 rather than 10x42.
Hi there - thanks for the comment and yes, 8x42 binoculars will often have more eye-relief than the 10x42 version, which usually makes them easier and better for eyeglass wearers. I am glad to know I helped you - all the best.
Thanks BBR man. I would have leant to 10x had I not done my research. Now I'm definitely going to 8x42. You were very clear with your info so I was happy to hit the like button and comment.
Hi Gerry - Many thanks to you for the kind words and feedback - much appreciated
I want to get some binoculars for my mother, who wants to view the mountain range visible from her living room. So far, I think a 8×42 might suit her better as she will have a harder time than most keeping the binoculars steady, so a lower magnification would still allow her to maintain focus on an area. She also plans on using them in low light conditions such as sunrise and sunset. Not sure if I will go for 42mm objective lenses, but I appreciate this informative video very much!
Hi, thanks for the comment and kind words, much appreciated. I agree, an 8x would be better for someone with unsteady hands - you could go for a smaller more lightweight binocular, so something like an 8x32 (see ones I have reviewed here tinyurl.com/5ka5tw59 ) which would also be easier to handle, but would then reduce the low light capability.
Get your mother a pair of bushnell 8x42 bonculars very good in low light I own a pair just amazing glass in any condition.
Someone should have mentioned using a tripod and a higher magnification. Handheld is good for moving objects but a mountain range is hardly ever going to be moving around…
Now I feel like I need more than one pair as I am sometimes watching birds in the woods, and other times watching birds at a distance on large bodies of water! But, at least I now understand the differences. Thank you for your very easy-to-understand explanations!
I have both a 8x42 and 10x42. You're not going to see any appreciable increase in bird detail at a distance with 10x binos than you're seeing with 8x. Yes, the birds will be ever so slightly bigger in the 10x, but it will only be noticeable if you look through the 8x and 10x back to back. If you're frequently looking at shore birds or birds at a distance, you're gonna want to consider a spotting scope to pair with your 8x binos
Hola!
-Como dice Kenny (gracias a el por este gran video) considere que si vd observa con buena luz, los 10x40 son buenos.
-Si vd tiene buen pulso, los 10x40 son buenos
-Si además observa a media distancia los 10x40 son buenos.
-Pero si va por zonas cerradas, de poca luz, o le tiembla el pulso los 8x40 son buenos. Dudo sea interesante tener dos herramientas bastante parecidas. Mejor disponer este dinero en un solo aparato que vd se siente mejor
@@mikecurtis1111 I was considering to buy an 10x , but i already have a very good Swaro NL Pure 8x42. Its not worth to get an extra 10 power like 10x32 or 10x42?
As an eyeglass user and one who birds a lot I look for 10x42 that offer a lot of eye relief, typically more than 20mm. I currently own Pentax with a 21mm eye relief and really love these binoculars which are not inexpensive but less than half the cost of truly high end binoculars like Leica
Yes, 21mm is good. I find 18mm is often enough, but it will depend on the shape of your face and the glasses you wear and how you wear them
I actually have one of each, 8x and 10x. And, depending on what I’m going to be looking at/for, choose between. If I’m hunting and need to see far out, I use a spotting scope. I used to try big, bulky , multi power binos to do it all, it was a big fail.
Hi yes, I agree with you - having both an 8x and 10x binocular is ideal and as you say, for most uses MUCH better than having most Zoom or variable magnification binoculars that in almost all cases cant match the quality or performance of a fixed focus binocular (see why here: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/zoom-binoculars.php ) . However, not everyone can afford or indeed may want to have two binoculars, and thus a choice has to be made.
Is it worth to have both? 8x42 NL Pure AND 10x42? or not so much difference? I have already 8x, but curious to 10x But i will use 8x the most
i do think 8x is the best all rounder, sometimes i find 10x too narrow and i know there are wider FOV in 10x than the ones i used but there is also the shaky image thats very noticeable when increasing magnification
Running Leica 8x42 for 20 years. Was a good purchase. Good quality, and rugged. Pass them on to a family member when I am gone.
I'm a hunter and I do most of my hunting at early dawn and late dusk. My personal choice is a pair of Nikon Monarch 7×50. They cost me $120. I find the exit pupil to be very good and it has a nice field of view. There very good in low light conditions and it's all the magnification I need. The down side is they are big and heavy but for the price and performance I can't really complain.
I really do like the 7x50 configuration as well - for both terrestrial uses and looking at the stars, one of my favorites and you are right, with such a large exit pupil, you don't HAVE to spend tons of money as it can makes up for lower quality glass and coatings: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/7x50-binoculars-for-astronomy-04/
Thats true, but most when you have a full dilating pupil of 7mm. When you get older, and you pupils flex less, 8x42 is equally effective with dark adapted eyes.
Hi , I have got 2 pairs, an 8x25 and a 10x42 bushnell waterproof h2o, I use the Minolta 8x25 when out walking, but live using the 10x42 when on the north east coast of Great Britain , as you say, very crisp and clear, had both pairs for years, and still very nice to use, lovely video and very clear and informative, even for a veteran birder, keep it up, Kenny
Hi Kenneth, Many thanks for the feedback and kind words, much appreciated - a compact 8x25 with a full size 10x42 is a great combination to have and as you say will cover most needs and uses perfectly.
Good video! I agree about that 8x42 is a better allround choice. Wider FOV, brighter image in low light, less shaky image and easier eye placement. 10x42 is more of a special task choice.
Very helpful. Feeling much better about the purchase I just made.
I just bought my wife some binos for Christmas, which she'll use to watch birds and other critters behind our house. I was going to get 10x42 but they were out of stock. I got the 8x42 (same brand/model). Now, I think she'll actually be happier with the binos I "settled for."
Hi, yes for around the house, I would usually go for an 8x over 10x as well. Have a Merry Christmas and do let us know how she likes her gift :-)
She got the 8x42 and loves it. 8x42 turned out to be the perfect selection for her purposes. Again, thanks for the insightful review.
Nice to have both 8x and 10x I own 8x42 10x36 10x50 12x50 and 7x50wide. 8x42 my favorite for wildlife birding.12x50 harder to hold steady but great long distance views with tripod or 15x70 for astronomy
Hi Yes, having both is ideal, I agree, but not for everyone - It just depends on how much you want to spend and how often you use your binoculars - so most people probablu only want one instrument - in which case it is very important to get the best configuration for your specific needs / preferences.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Agree and the 8x42 is the SWEET spot INHO A do it all Binocular. Even a 10x for steady hands?
I knew all of this , but decided to watch your clip anyway. I am in the market and wanted to be sure that I wasn't overlooking anything, but I am now confident that my decision on what to buy will be the best one I can make. Thank you , very well done!
While this video has been out since Oct of 2019 I have only recently viewed it. Everything you said is spot on. I have my trusty 8x42 Vortex for yrs and wanted to upgrade. I jumped right out and bought 12x50, WOW, what a mistake. Everything you said about the differences is very accurate. The 12x50 were surprisingly difficult to control the shaking. I got lucky that the dealer I bought the 12x50 from agreed to exchange the 12x50 for 8x42 even after the 30 day exchange window had passed. The new 8x42 will do what I am looking for and they are of better quality and yes more money. I don't have them as of this writing, they are in the mail as they say. I love my first set of 8x42 Vortex so after speaking with the sales person about what I wanted to achieve, I am sure I bought the right binocular, with the improvements I was looking for. Keep making these videos, You do speak the truth!
Hi Robert, Many thanks for the kind words and great feedback. Yes it is true, for most general use, something like an 8x42 is ideal. I personally can hold a 12x50 still for short periods, but everyone is different and even so, there is little doubt that high powered binoculars are best used with a tripod in-order to appreciate the extra detail. All the best and please let us know how you get on with the 8x42 - which series did you choose?
Wht your intro is all about (Oct 2019)
Been using 10x42 Zeiss for years but broke them, just got a new pair of Athlon 8x42s. Primary use is hunting and especially important to have good light transmission during dawn and dusk. Haven’t tested them much yet but they seem really good. My dad has used a pair of 7x42s for decades and they are wonderful for hunting.
Hi - thanks for the comment and update, much appreciated. I too love the 7x42 configuration, sadly is quite rare to find these days.
I still use my Chinon 7x50 binos. Yeah, they're large and heavy, but, they always help me find the objects I'm looking for.
Thank you for helping me to decide. After almost making a spontaneous in-store purchase from someone who didn't know anything about lenses but let us try half a dozen pairs that really didn't work for us, your video steered me to a different store with the right choice. Thank you for explaining the broader field of view - that's what I want. Also the low light conditions. The moment I tried them I knew they were perfect! My son and I have very different facial (his eyes are wider set, the bridge of his nose broader and flatter than mine) and focal (he's nearsighted and I'm far-sighted) structures, but we were both able to say "wow, these are the ones". Looking forward to wildlife (and maybe even Jupiter! ) with our new Nikon Prostaff 7S 8 x 42s :) Someday I'll buy that $2000 telescope I really want, hahaha. But these come in way under budget and with 2 very happy customers. Thank you.
Hi Lisa, Welcome to the world of binoculars - I am really glad to have been able to help also many thanks for the feedback and kind words it is very much appreciated.
for general purpose my go to is a tasco sierra essentials 10x42, that range is ther best balance i have seen between power and keeping them steady, i have a compact pair of bushnell 8x42s that i use when i do shed or mushroom hunting, very handy! i also love the twist up eyecups since i just got glasses and they are now a must have on any binos i get, i used to have a pair of 12x50 in the that same set but i let a friend borrow it and it was returned broken in half after, apparently being stepped on, haven't been able to find a pair of those anywhere!
Thanks for sharing your insight. Your clear explanation of facts wasn't colored by personal opinion. Sharing quantifiable information and inviting the viewer to decide what would be best for them is a fabulous approach! I appreciate your excellent production values that enhanced the presentation. Kudos to you!
Great video, I agree with most of it. My preference is a leupold bx-4 8x42, but I also have an old Otsuka japan 7x35 porro that I use too. Pros and cons to both. One thing not mentioned is wind. I find for windy conditions image stability can be difficult, so my preference is for 8x and 7x. The other thing is thermal heat waves and smog/hazy conditions over long range landscapes. I have found increased magnification of a hazy or thermal blurry image less desirable. So again 8-7x is my preference.
You make some excellent points and whilst often very minor, you are right, the weather (other than light) can have a bearing on which binoculars would be best under those conditions
Excellent content. Learned a few things in my old age.
I use my binoculars for star gazing and looking at the moon when I'm too lazy to set up my telescope I also use them for animal observation
Hey gus, whenny you see moon what you use 10/42 or 8/42, what is good for moon and stars watching
@@ahmedsohail67 neither. 7 or 8 x by 50mm. You need larger lenses. If you can tripod them go up to 15 or 20 x 70 mm or 80mm
U use 10x50 for stargazing❓
Thanks for such a helpful video !!! I've recently started birdwatching and was tempted to buy a pair of Adasion 12x42 as it was on sale. After watching reading guides and seeing this video, I'm relieved I didn't rush and buy it.
Hi, thanks for the feedback and am glad to have helped. Yes, for most birding an 8x42 is a good option. For long-range and out in the open, like fields, at the coast, or other waterfronts a 10x42 can be better. For very long range, you could go for a 12x, but I would then also suggest getting a pair with larger objectives (like 50mm) to make sure you still get a decent low light performance. If you are interested here are some 12x50 binocular reviews on BBR: snip.ly/upg9i5
Very useful information. I’ve actually got a pair of each. I’m a birder with a pair of each. Now I can decide which to use based on the situation. 8x for woods birding, 10x for waterfowl at beaches and marshes. Thanks.
Hi Ruth, thanks for the comment and feedback and really glad to be of help.
I've watched a lot of videos on binoculars and this is got to be the best!
Hi Scott, once again many thanks for the feedback and kind words.
I use a combination of Opticron Discovery WP PC 10x50, plus Opticron Discovery WP PC 8x42, plus Celestron Granite 8x42 bino's.
A good range of prices from around £180 - £200 for the Opticrons (depending on size and current pricing) and about £300 when purhased for the Celestron Granite (which have gone up in price since purchase about 4 years ago)
The Opticrons are very good quality indeed when compared too the Celestron Granite and I would say the better bargain, as they can cost up to half the price of the Celestron. The Opticron 8x42 is very good for close up bird watching, but looses out a little for longer distance viewing of details too the bigger 10x50 model, as you would expect of course.
The Opticron 10x50 is a narrower field of view to both of the other bino's (a little) but not in a major way that is as obvious as you might imagine. You gain with the 10x power over the 8x power, but loose a little even with the 50mm aperture. Again, just as you would expect.
If I had to choose only one set of bino's however, I would go for the 10x50 Opticron's. This would be down to their higher power for longer distances (rambling and general use etc) and their very good performance optically (a real bargain at their current price of around £200) plus they work well for short distance aswell, especially if you are looking at a small target that doesn't move around with big movements anyway. Like a bird feeding in (mostly) one spot. Or maybe birds feeding off a seed feeder, so the target position is basically fixed anyway.
Given a choice of TWO bino's, the Celestron Granite's take some beating for quality of the optics and build, but the Opticron 8x42 give it a very, VERY good run for the money, especially as one is half the price of the other. I would be very happy with both Opticrons only, if I hadn't bought the Celestron bino first. Indeed, I bought the Opticron 8x42 as a second bino, so as not to possibly damage the much more expensive Celestron Granite while travelling, imagine my surprise when I found out how good the Opticron 8x42 bino was on first try.
I bought the 10x50 Opticron for that little further reach to see things that bit further away. while the image quality is the same as the smaller 8x power version (both are excellent) and is my 'go-to' for most things now.
Thank you so much. I was trying to make this exact decision on 8x42 vs 10x42.
Hi John, glad to help and thanks for saying thanks 👍😊
What did you do finally???
Great. Ordered my first pair of Binoculars. 10x42.
Hi Zaber, that is Excellent, welcome to the world of Binoculars! Let me know what you got and how you find using them after you have had some time with them
Went to Cabellas to try 8x42 and 10x42 of the same model. Walked away with 8x42 because I wear prescription glasses and 8x42 had less strain on my eyes. I had a better experience with 8x42.
Yes, a lower magnification does usually make for a more relaxed experience and thus easier on your eyes, even for those who don't use glasses.
Thanks for the high quality videos and reviews . As a glass fetishist of 35 yrs[photographer] I’m loving you’re binocular material. Cheers mark Australia
Hi Mark, you are most welcome and many thanks for the kind words, they are much appreciated 👍
Excellent comparison! My goto is a 10x42 Bushnell Engage excellent all purpose binos. I can comfortably hold a 15x70 for astronomy so the 10x is my choice all day.
The Engage series from Bushnell looks to be really good. How do you find them optically? Unfortunately I have not been able to test them as I have never had a reply back from Bushnell :-(
@@Bestbinocularsreviews hey Jason optically they are very good optics, color accuracy is spot on, sharp from the centre to about 85% and the same goes vertically. My favourite thing about them is size and comfort. They also had decent eye relief. Optically I cannot fault them on par with my vortex viper HD 8x42 but better FOV and ER.
I am not a newbie and it was a delight to follow your clear and concise language and explanation. Been fascinated by optics since childhood and would you credt it? I was Reg'd blind at 45. No matter, Retinitis Pigmentosa or tunnel vision to the layman. I have optics for all seasons, small monoculars for railway station/airports information boards going to 8x30 monocular for weight saving or my 8x30 binos if not. I have 8x42's and 10x50's. I go on the hill or around the coast using the old 3 legged stool and a photographers monopod as a walking pole and at stop times I attach my binos. No longer young this makes a serious difference to hand shake and I can sit, take my ease and look for birds and wildlife. Best Wishes, McIntyre, Scotland.
Hi - many thanks for the feedback and kind words, much appreciated
That's interesting how binoculars work. I have an 8x25 monocular because I like how more compact it is than binoculars. My grandfather had a 35X70 binoculars, and they are huge.
70mm binoculars are very big and usually very heavy, plus the 35x magnification is massive - to get the best out of those you really do need to have them mounted onto a tripod. For more on this and why, check out my guide to high power, long range binoculars: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/high-powered-long-distance-viewing-binoculars.php as well as my guide to tripods for binoculars: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/binocular-accessories.php
First Pair or General Purpose. 8x all the way. The field of view will be important you’ll get used to targeting objects easily especially if it’s a bird. If your buying compacts 8x. Boating 8x. Mariners actually use 8 or less. When things start moving it’s field of view. So starting with 8x is usually safer if your unsure.
10x is kinda the standard but that’s changed so much. The 8x lens although is more of your general purpose all around lens. Anything 10 or more you start narrowing down its uses but increasing the magnification.
Compacts will suffer from lower light conditions as you’ll see 8x21 and 8x25 vs 10x25 meaning the exit Pupil Diameter will be much less than 3mm in some cases. So in that case the lower Magnification may be more appreciated in low light on a compact. A compact isn’t really all that useful at higher magnifications anyways.
You ever hand a person a pair of binoculars and they say I can’t see anything. It’s usually due to the fact they don’t use them and can’t target objects easily. Then you point and you turn them and say it’s right their and then the moments gone. 🤣. This is where 8x will come in handy as well vs the 10x. Having the detail is great especially if your somebody who knows how to use binoculars. It’s going to miserable for the person that doesn’t. So going with an 8x can be that much more helpful.
Theirs a purpose for all of them but in general that’s my opinion.
Their are other sizes as well. But as he said anything more than 10x tripod. Anything less than 8x you may have shakey hands or it’s a baseball game.
The 8x vs 10x battle. Some companies actually make a 9x due to the debate.
Hi Kristopher. Many thanks for the feedback and your excellent observations and I 100% agree with you, those new to binoculars should if possible keep the magnification to a minimum and is one of the main points I bang on BBR. eg: Avoid These Biggest Mistakes Newbies Make When Choosing Binoculars www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/biggest-mistakes-newbies-make-when-choosing-binoculars-02/
That was one of the best explanatory videos I've seen on TH-cam - clearly explained, well informed, and helpful. You have a new (grateful) subscriber.
Hi Keith, many thanks for the feedback and kind words, it is much appreciated
There MUST be a reason why 8x40s are still made by every manufacturer. Every fibre of one's being says that 10 has simply got to be better than 8, right? However...
@@robertcook2572 I can only assume you made that comment before watching the video?
i'm shaky, you solved my doubt quite fast, thank you very much
Happy to help and thanks for the feedback - much appreciated :-)
Thanks for explaining this very clearly, I've just ordered a secondhand compact pair of leica 8x20 to keep in my pocket when out walking. 👍
Hi, Glad it was helpful and many thanks for the feedback - it is much appreciated. Please let me know how you go with your new purchase once you have had some time to use them.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Sadly those Lieca 8x20s never turned up. Thankfully I managed to get my money back as I got them through Amazon. I don't think the company actually ever had them in the first place as they kept putting off sending them out. I have tried/borrowed a pair since and for the size they are excellent
Good video but I feel you left out one very important factor , Eye Fatigue , the higher magnification will produce more eye fatigue , I have several pairs and in different powers but for everyday use and my leave on the seat of my truck I prefer a High Definition 8 power, I like a higher power for short intervals for a closer look but that's all, give me my 8's if I'm going to be looking through them for any period of time ..........
Great point! Yes you are right, there is no doubt that a lower powered binocular is far more relaxing on the eyes to use than a high powered one. I think this is partly/mostly to do with the increased image shake you get with higher magnifications and your brain & eyes trying to compensate for it. Mounting your binoculars onto something like a tripod does help with this, but not always practical.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Yes totally agree, thanks for the reply .........
And greater depth of sharpness on the 8x42 helps too, less intense focusing and less blurry surroundings.
Thanks! Was going to buy 10’s but now 8’s.
Hi thanks for the feedback - glad yo have helped
I have a pair of Vortex 8x42 Crossfire HD that I use for squirrel hunting, because that is basically (but not always) their purpose I didn't want to go with the 10x42 because if the shake factor. And have had no issues with them the few times I have used them outside of squirrel hunting, actually was using them to glass some bald eagles in the area around 300 yards off and as long as I held them against a tree they worked perfectly fine....great info that's!
Hi Frank - many thanks for the feedback - as I say an 8x42 is probably the most versatile and for many users the right choice.
Thanks for explaining to where I could understand, just wanting to watch birds from my backyard.
Excellent presentation and made a confusing topic to the novice easy to understand.
Glad it was helpful and many thanks for the feedback - much appreciated
I really enjoyed your expertise and clear concise explanations! I look forward to more of your content.
Hi Greg, Thanks for the comment, much appreciated 👍
Great review and unbiased commentary-I’m keen on whale watching from my balcony so will most probably go for a 10x50 magnification. Another Saffer
Howzit! Many thanks for the comment and feedback - much appreciated :-)
Thanks Jason. Ive been trawling the net trying to decide what to buy in either 10x42, 10x50, price and quality. Great video, very helpful.
Ho Trev, glad to help and many thanks for the feedback - much appreciated.
Been birding in tropical jungle conditions for a couple of months now. I've had it good with a 10x42 so far. Not as wide a field of view as an 8x42, but I can manage well enough for the combination of low light understory and tracking small birds that are closer up, like Flowerpeckers, and then looking at a pair of hornbills on some taller treetops that are farther, or a raptor gliding midair. The extra 2x difference does make up the distance that you can't pull in as much with an 8x. That being said though, I have also gone ahead and gotten an angled spotting scope with 25x to cover much farther birds.
My opinion 10х42 The best! . With love from Ukraine. Thank you.
Disfrute de su afición en paz y felicidad próxima
I use both 10x42 and 8x42 and prefer all the advantages of the 8x42 mentioned, as well as a deeper sharpness range (less blurry background)
Great review. Covered most, if not all the questions I have on the subject. Thanks.
Hi John, Many thanks for the feedback and really glad to be of help.
Best video on bynacular ever, love from India
Many thanks for the kind words, much appreciated👍😀
Really useful thanks very much. I am now going to buy the 8 x 42
Hi Mark - you are welcome and thanks for the feedback, much appreciated - Enjoy your new bins and let me know how it goes.
I'm thinking of getting into birdwatching and your review was first class thanks. I wasn't sure what the magnification numbers meant for the field of vision. So i was very unsure which magnification would be best for me so your review helped a great deal with the details you went into so it has made my choice far easier I'll opt for the 8×42 binoculars. Thanks 👍
Hi Dave, you are welcome, glad to help - yes 8x42 is generally considered better for most short to mid range birding and thanks for the kind words.
Excellent explanation for someone who knew nothing about the difference between the 8x42 and 10x42. Your final conclusion was also very informative as it gave examples of who would use each one. As a hiker you made my mind up which one. (yes the 10x42) WELL DONE
Hi Dafydd - glad to be of help and thanks very much for the feedback - much appreciated.
Best explanation of binoculars I've ever seen or heard. Thank you.
Wow, thanks for the very kind words - glad to be of help!
I'm shopping for binoculars for the first time and this was very helpful, thank you!
Glad it was helpful and many thanks for the feedback - much appreciated
i got a 10x42 nikon P3 for the baltic sea recently. so that was the right choice then, thanks!
You are welcome, thanks for the comment and feedback
How do you not have 100k subscribers? Amazing content, thank you!
I wish! Maybe one day > thanks for the kind words, certainly helps in regards to giving me the motivation to keep trying 👍
Very good explanation. And everything summarised in a concise manner.
Thank you very much for your kind words
What a dang near flawless summary/intro to bin basics!
Thanks for the feedback and kind words - much appreciated
All birders in Ecuador used 8x42. Celestron have great affordables options for this niche. You could also invest on a harnas, it makes a huge difference when birding on the forest👌
Yes, 8x42's are generally considered ideal for birders and yes a bino harness can help - comfort and free up your hands: Binocular Harness Guide www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/binocular-harness.php
thank You so much. I am new to all this and this is the third time I have watched your video and things are very clear to me now.
Hi Bruce, many thanks for the kind words and feed back and I am really glad to have been of help. All the best.
I just ordered the Alton Argos g2 in 10x42 for identifying deer. Hopefully they work good in lowlight
Excellent hope you enjoy them - let me know how it goes.
You are really a good instructor. Thanks so much.
Thanks very much for the kind words.. they are much appreciated
I use a Steiner 8x42 for years and very happy with it.
Great review which helped me get the best alternative for watching cricket .Many thanks
this video has really helped me with my choice of bino thank you
Cleared it up for me, thanks Jason.
Hi Rupert, you're welcome! and thanks for letting me know, much appreciated.
OK this helped me decide to go for 8x! Now I still need to choose between the Hawke Endurance ED 8x42 mono or the Vortex Solo 8x36 mono, as a compact hiking/camping tool 😅
It's not as easy as it sounds.
I have a 8x25 which is brighter than my other 10x50. Everything depends on how good is the glass and coating. Also i have a 10x42 that gives a more steady image than my 8x25. The 10x42 gives a wider view.
Hello, which one is suitable for sky observing? Moon, stars etc. 8x42 or 10x42?
Same question
Excellent video! Thanks for sharing your knowledge!
My pleasure and many thanks for the comment - much appreciated
Explained a lot of things I was not aware of. Now I know why I feel nauseous using high-powered binoculars.
Thank you so much, great video to really understand how things works!., now i need to decide today or max. tomorrow which one to get......, the Nikon Monarch HG 8x42 or the Nikon Monarch 10x42., mainly for some safaris in Africa sometimes or just walking around in some forrest, National Parks or coastlines., i had previous an Steiner Observer 10x42....was ok but i want a better one and theNikon Monarch HG looks very good and has some great reviews.....i try yesterday in a shop the Steiner Ranger xtreme , both , the 8x42 and 10x42 and finally i see the difference with some vibration when trying to hold for a while on some objects on the 10x42 and much better on the 8x42 and also more light......but i like the idea of having more reach with 10x42....going soon t south Africa for 2 weeks holidays, maily to coastline....do you think for this is better the 10x42....? and for Safaris also the 10x42....?., and finally for birds.....anyway, thank you so much and just subscribed.Best regards
I think for uses near the coast and on general safari, a 10x42 is a great option - usually plenty of light and wide open spaces. If however you tend to do a lot of birding whilst on safari and or a lot of very early morning or evening drives/walks, then you perhaps would rather opt for the 8x42 configuration instead.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Thank you, again...!
@@marcelopisani8157 hi, what did you chose ?
Great video mate thanks, I'm going to go with the 8x42!
Your welcome, glad to have been a little help. Do you have any ideas as to which 8x42 binocular you are going to go for?
@@Bestbinocularsreviews I'm thinking of going with the Nikon Prostaff 3S 8x42 as that has good reviews.
Excellent review. Cleared up a lot of my questions....
Thanks very much for the feedback and kind words. Much appreciated 👍 😊
Great video you covered a lot of my questions and explained everything very well. I got a pair of cheap 70 mm binos with a 12 to 60 zoom. The zoom is a challenge because it changes the focus and I find the need to refocus both eyes each time. So you need to set the zoom and focus and leave it there. You can't zoom in effectively and get focused and you need a concrete or cast iron base to mount the thing on to reduce shake. I'm looking for a machine stand from a drill press maybe..
Thank you, your video really helped me to finally ensure which binocular would fit my needs best. Before watching it, I've been quite a lot confused.
Thanks for the feedback and glad to have been able to help. Love to know which binoculars you have chosen?
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Decided to buy 8x40, because usually I'm gonna use binocular into the woods and hilly terrain to admire landscapes, also during sunset sometimes. Not often on vast and open spaces. I think I'll probably go for Nikon Action EX. Regards!
Brilliant video, very clear explanations and helped decide on getting 8x42 🙌🏻
Hi Nico, many thanks for the feedback and kind words, much appreciated - sorry for the late response - I have been a ill recently - Hope your 8x42's worked out for you - what did you end up getting?
Thanks. Made my decision a lot easier.
You are welcome and than you for the kind words & feedback.
It's easier to hold the 8x42 than a 10x42 un less you use a tri pod , a 10x42 and a 8x42that what I use bushnell 8x42 it's very nice field of view very good in low light conditions like your review very much thankyou
Hi Tony, many thanks for the feedback and kind words and yes for sure, it is easier to keep the image shake free on a lower powered binocular like an 8x42.
Thanks, now I have idea what to buy on my upcoming safari. I don't know nothing about binoculars, now I know. Thanks.
I bought a pair of 8x42mm roof prism binoculars because everything that I read at the time said 8x is the "best" general purpose binoculars. But I had my reservations. After 2 weeks with the 8x42mm, I wish I had bought the 10x42mm. I still have the 8x42mm because i paid less than $200 for a $500 pair of binoculars on Black Friday, but I don’t use them as often as my 10x42mm.
Is it worth to have both? 8x42 NL Pure AND 10x42? or not so much difference? I have already 8x, but curious to 10x But i will use 8x the most
Many thanks fr Rio 🇧🇷 Brazil,for your great information.
Thanks very much for the feedback and your kind words, it is really appreciated 👍
Thanks for explaining! I learnt something new today!
Glad it was helpful! and thanks for saying thanks! Much appreciated 😜👍
Nice video! You explain things very well. comparisons that I had never considered, Thanks!
Hi, glad to hear it helped and many thanks for the feedback, it is much appreciated.
If you're a hunter and not extreme long range, 8X42 is the best and one with quality HD lenses will suffice. You get the broadest field of view within non-extreme shooting ranges, you can still see really far with it and you won't cry a river if you damage- or loose it, as you probably would if you loose a classy ED-unit at 2-3X the cost. That easily happens when hunting - especially in rugged terrain. Meopta has a fantastic 8X42 with flouride-HD lenses, the Optika HD. Perhaps review it? I think it's the absolute top in the price bracket (but I would still cry, if I lost it!). The Leupold BX-2 Alpine is also a very good candidate. Bird-watching? Get an ED unit for that final accuracy in the representation of the observed and a 10X42 to get a bit closer to the little fella too. Of course, if budget is not an issue, ED is the superior choice in all use cases.
Great videos. My problem is that I am in the forest area and the coast! Ideally I need 3 pairs. 8x32 for hiking and travel, 8x42 and I want the 10x42 for the coast. Would also use them for stargazing!
Clear and lucid information.