If Two Tier had his way there would be no Monarchy he thinks they are unnecessary you can almost hear him shouting 'chop off their heads' The King must know Starmer has no allegiance to the Crown and should never have been Knighted. The other fool shouldn't be either that idiot Mayor of London he has insulted the Monarchy this last week made a joke of being Knighted.
You don't nee to be monarchist. As long as there is no other option to award people officially by the state, this the is the only option and thus for all no matter what is your political opinion. The list of the people to be awarded is not created by the royals, but by a committee.
@@DavideMazzetti You’re naive or just won’t admit it. Your tampon king has always been involved (interfered) in your gov politics. He is the real problem with your now Unconstitutional Monarchy.
His mate Ali has one as well...and that weasel khan....looks as though anyone who owns a carpet runner gets one for....???? Knighthoods going Cheap as chips these days!.
@@sparkypete3417 very much agreed!! Everyone except Becks, who actually accomplished something, seems to get one. The justice who threw out Megs' case, giving her the win, was made a LORD. ....even after he fell for her ''the emails self delete after a month'' story. All the best to you in 2025! Kind of hope you get a knighthood!!
Anyone who says "...diversity of culture, ethnicity and Faith provides strength, not weakness. " is part of the problem and the reason for these atrocities against children.
The only men I call Sir are those who are respectful, truthful, and have earned the title. Being Knighted now means nothing more than being given a piece of toilet roll to wipe your nose with.
I hope someone publicly challenges him on this! We've not seen proof he returned the money given him by his mutual millionaire friend. As a retired nurse it was made clear we did not accept gifts as they could be seen as bribes and back handers. We all know he know the rules or he wouldn't have challenged others on the subject!! Can't stand the man. He's not to be trusted!
i thought they were the party of the poorer working class....then the first thing they do is take away pensioners' heating allowance while giving themselves fully paid for mansions. It's like Canada....our working man's party leader wears a $5,000 Rolex and armani suits
I 100% agree, but they shouldn't even be referred to as Labour, should officially be called Liebour in view of their current attacks on us British ordinary indigenous citizens.
The King should dissolve parliament and revoke starmer's knighthood. The debate resulting from the petition for another general election begins on Monday. He needs to listen to the public.
Wait until Trump gets in, he and Charles are close, he is the only one he will deal with as the government are complicit in election interference. He could force another general election.
I'm out of money, can't get any more electric on my stick till i get my pension in 5 days. Bastards won't kill me. I refuse to allow it. Wouldn't give them the pleasure of saving my pension. Oh and their's snow due in two days. Looks like I'm set for my longest lie in ever. At least my beds warm 🙊 And i don't want sympathy, I've been through worse. I want this labour party out. Unfortunately a lot of pensioners aren't as robust as me, they're the ones who need help.
God bless you sir. devastating. i would suggest that you send your energy provider a conditional offer to use what you want and pay what you can afford. research common law initiatives in the freedom movement . There is representation across the whole of the UK for people seeking sovereignty. Richard Vobes has interviewed many of them. unfortunately social media and big tech are burying these initiatives.
Charles and the monarchy are central to everything bad that we're living through. Only need to look at his Christmas speech (and the deleted version!) for an example
@ FGs, Charles is not utterly powerless. He made his feelings known when he praised Starmers action. I give Charles kudos for going and talking to the people and not doing a runner like Starmer does when the going gets tough. Charles is surrounded by his wef members. Anything he wants done for himself, he gets. I bet his milk herd are not being given gates fart feed. He praised Khans green agenda that is just a tax revenue scheme and does nothing for the environment. But don’t worry, Charles has never sat in a traffic jam in London in his life. I have no doubt life is very hard for him right now, but he can slink off to High-grove or one of his many house bolt holes to get peace and quiet.
I agree with Elon. The King must know the pain this government is causing the British People. Come in King Charles, you must use your power, and quick!!
A British Monarch has not dissolved Parliament since the 1700s. That is because the British people do not accept the Monarch interfering in a democratically elected government. The people run the government through their elected officials, not the Monarchy.
@@roslynclark6690 Technically, the King can dissolve Parliament but it hasn't been done since the 1700s. Also, as Head of State, the Monarch is constitutionally bound to follow the advice of the government. I can't even imagine what kind of crisis it would take to force a Monarch to dissolve Parliament today. Something like this happened in Australia in 1975 when the government was totally deadlocked and the Governor-General, who is appointed by the Prime Minister as representative of the Queen,, dismissed Parliament. But, according to the Australian Constitution, the Queen has no part in the decisions of their Governor-General.
And the diabolical act by these mp's gifting all their buddy's knighthoods when they are sacked should be abolished, it's just a licence to stick two fingers up at the taxpayers and rip us off big time, that's if they don't fall asleep for the twenty minutes they are required to actually be in the house of spongers.
@noniousxltruffles7454 So it's OK for liebour to send 100 party apparatchiks to help Kamala Hyena Harris win😂Political interference has been happening between nations for centuries,I suggest you read a bit of history.
@@noniousxltruffles7454 Starmer didn't keep out of the US Election. The new President and his team will be dealing with the UK government in future. They will have an opinion
@@noniousxltruffles7454 he’s entitled to an opinion. Starmer sent his minions over to the US to try and sway the outcome of their elections, remember? Works both ways.
It is illegal in the UK as well. If you don't pay your bill then a PAYG meter is installed. If you don't feed the meter then it cuts off automatically, then you freeze but the company can not actually cut you off itself. Many of our OAPs are already on meters and so will need to make a couple of choices either freeze or starve to death, or be cold and hungry at the same time. I don't that this measure will cost more than maybe 100 lives and these will be those who are already having great difficulty surviving on their own as it is. The main point is why should our OAPs suffer at all or be made to feel that they are some kind of unwelcome or unwanted burden on society? My 88 year old mother does not need any charity, trust me on that one, but this makes her no less upset, indeed angry. The savings are tiny compared to what our government chooses to utterly waste the tax payers money on, so why do it at all? The message to all of our OAPs is clear. The State does not want you anymore. With all of your many and growing medical issues, it is costing us a fortune to keep you alive in your own home only to cost even more when you finally need to go into care. Therefore we would very much prefer that you died or other how buggered off ASAP. We have had your taxes and all of the other profit from your hard work and we are now taxing your children, grandchildren and greatgrandchildren into poverty, so quite frankly we really don't need you cluttering up the place anymore. It is well past time you slung your hook as we have a few million boat people already lined up for your council flat. The clear messaging alone will finish off a few years earlier far more OAPs than it will either starve or freeze.
The government has not shut off heating if you are of a certain age your heating cannot be turned off what the government has done is stop the heating allowence to all pensioners only those on benefits get it ,which leaves a majority worrying how they going to get through a cold winter
@@bowlingbill9633when the energy company forces you to have a Pay And Go Meter and your pension doesn’t stretch to the highest electricity charges in Europe (go Google that and compare) and you run out of money before your next pension date arrives: you are cut off. So whether they stop supplying you with electricity at their end or they install their equipment to cut you off at your end-the aim and the result are the same. It’s just that when they cut you off at your end they can tell people they didn’t do it, you did, and people believe the narrative and blame the pensioner for spending their hard earned pension in frivolities like food 😢
@@bowlingbill9633: If you don't pay the bill, a prepaid meter is installed. This effectively means, if you don't keep the meter in credit you don't get any supply. So again it comes down to feeding the meter with credits to keep warm, or buying food. Some Pensioners miss out on Pension Credits by just a few pounds and are therefore not entitled to the Winter Fuel Allowance. Meanwhile we send millions of taxpayer's money abroad on stupid projects. Wasteful and stupid. We just sent millions to Syria. We waste millions every day on benefits for illegal immigrants, go figure. The sooner we are rid of Sneer Starmer and his Labour Government the better, in my opinion. A more useless collection of individuals, than our present Government, it would be hard to imagine.
You have many in the Commonwealth of Nations standing with you against the tyranny of this Labor Government. You folk should be heartened that so many throughout the world wish only the best for your great nation and its people. But wishes and prayers can only go so far. Especially heartening should be the fact that Elon Musk, with all the resources and influence he possesses also does not want to see the UK 'destroyed'.
@RobynRobinson-z9x You had me right up to your support for that ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT Musk. He needs to keep his beak OUT of UK politics 🤬 Having bought the US presidency for CONVICTED CRIMINAL really DOES NOT make him some political expert. It simply shows how CORRUPT the pair of them are!
@@MsJk29I'm concerned about both....terrible diction and hours of saying very little..no political skills and from what I can see..little integrity or ability to read the room.
Albanese is just as bad imo. We Aussies were lucky he spent his first 2 years pushing yes for the voice referendum. Labor is spending tax payer dollars like drunken sailors.
So whats the point of the House of.Lords? Thought they were suppose to kerp the government in check? Or because Starmers cronies are getting knighthoods out of crisp packets thesedays is in now in cheque?
I have seen many tweets from people asking, begging Elon Musk to help the UK, unlike our King Elon has responded. What the hell has happened to our beautiful United Kingdom.
Very true, but keep in mind Stasi Starmer pledged before the election that he would dissolve the so called house of lords(spongers), and less than four weeks later he wriggled his way out of that fake pledge.
Charles is a weak man who doesn't like confrontation, apparently. But then it's easy for him as he is a multi, multi billionaire. He will do nothing, in my opinion.
If King Charles does dissolve Parliament, the Monarchy will end. He cannot dissolve a legitimately elected Government. That's why we have "His Majesty's opposition" to put pressure on the Government of the day.
Dissolve.Parliament! Then what?! He CANNOT call an election . So you'd have a minority government, with the opposition having a huge majority! How on earth could that work?!
The optics are looking bad. Blaming fathers for trying to rescue their daughters is wrong. Arresting 13yrs olds and saying they are to blame is ignorant.
Look how things are done in those countries. As often as not in the circumstances similar to those in question the women are blamed so this is not surprising.
An anti-monarchist marked for a knighthood would reject their nomination. Just goes to show, Starmer has no moral backbone. His beliefs blow with the wind and cannot be trusted an inch.
Hello Neil, I couldn't agree with Elon Musk more....King Charles does need to dissolve this government before they do any more damage. They've done nothing but lie and seem to forget that it's us paying their salaries. Labour needs to go! Penny from Christchurch. 🇬🇧
@stefashaler8340 you're quite right, but he can also see that the country is going to hell in a handcart and he knows we were lied to and continue to be lied to. Trouble is, he's a Globalist as well and lacks a backbone.
@ yes by destroying the Monarchy then the Commonwealth is destroyed and laws and the countries become up for picking and more Chaos is created for the One World Order agenda
Who on earth voted Jess Philips, Angela Rayner and all of the labour rabble into office? Thank you for bringing us, what was an uncomfortable video report. It's got to be said, and who better to say it?
@cakehole53 I'm fine thanks Kev. I completely lost YT for a while, then I couldn't comment but it seems OK now. I'm so pleased to hear that things are going well with Thelma....she's a lucky girl....she's got a good "dad" ~ bless you both. xx
I was a Royalist but after the speech which i know everyone loved, sorry i didn't, i dont feel he now is strong enough to stand up for his people and the church.. 😢 And what have they just done, gave out a knighthood to someone that doesn't respect the Royals. 🤔 or the English people
I’m a Royalist through and through but Charles’s speech infuriated me🤷♀️. He needs to abdicate and give the reins to William who is a much stronger man imo!
The King delivers speeches approved by the Prime Minister. Also, the Honours committee decides who is to receive an honour. Their list is sent to the Prime minister for his approval, the King has no say in it.
Aren't political parties kicked out by elections? The British government was elected by the people. To "kick it out" would be total disrespect for the democratic process. That is a matter for the people, not the King.
Agree. It’s hard to believe any leader could be worse than Biden but Starmer is just as bad AND he’s moving at breakneck speed without any fear of consequences. Biden had to put effort into covering up and he had to contend with Congress. Starmer is just a wrecking ball with no off switch.
You are only reading the views of anti-Labour disgruntled right wing voters. The present government was democratically elected with a huge majority. Please do not assume that their rants reflect the opinions of the whole British electorate. When they speak of "the people" , they mean people who share their own political ideology. Plenty don't.@@ChristianLife888
The king should take responsibility and do the right thing for his subjects. He should apologize for knighting Khan and tell us why? If he can't/will not do what is right, he should step down! I am done with royalty now that the Queen is gone. King Charles has let his mother and the British people down, and that is considered betrayal.
The people who are occupying those homes should be required to hire their own staff and pay them from their own wages. The citizens shouldn’t have to pay for their luxuries. Pay their own heating, food and garden services. It’s not on the “People” to make a comfortable life for them.
From what I've read, it's the government who decide who is to be knighted, not the king! However, I did think there was a way he could decline it, but I'm not sure.@stevengrant1319
The king sat there with his crown on his head reading out all the promises Labour had instructed him to read out! Now Labour has reneged on these promises,,,all complete lies…the King should dissolve this government or he’s complicit in these lies himself!
@@Arthurianski On the contrary, I think the whole labour party is an abhorrence. And Keir Starmer an Orwellian nightmare. I want him evicted from number 10 as quickly and legally as possible. And I want the lazy electorate to get off their behinds and vote for a better government. However, I do not want to destroy the country, to make my wish come true. Which is what will happen if the King dissolves Parliament.
The King is not a strong King. When you compair him to his sister Anne, it shows, as the saying goes, "he wouldn't say boo to a goose". Too many things have been allowed to happen that should not have happened. Money belonging to the British people has been used to house, feed, cloth and keep thousands of strangers who come over the sea and land in our country. Hundreds of thousands of British people are homeless, 1.7 million people can't afford to heat their homes, millions can't afford to buy food. The King should speak out against rob Peter to pay Paul attitudes. Policies being proposed and implemented by the Labour Party, and supported by the far left, are draining Britain and robbing the British people.
I haven't forgotten that the king stated a few months ago that Britain should allow ALL so called asylum seekers( illegal invaders) into our country, shows just how out of touch he is with the state HIS country is in.
It is for "His Majesty's opposition" to do something. A legitimately elected Government (ie, a parliament by the people) cannot be over thrown by the King, ( the people).
King Charles is not weak. A look at his long record of service and standing strong through all kinds of conflicts proves that. His schedule alone would grind a lot of people half his age to dust. He knows his role as a Constitutional Monarch is to respect the will of the people who elected the government. The King is not prone to weak, macho, impulsive acts that would tarnish the dignity of the Crown and throw the country into chaos. Parliament has not been dissolved by a Monarch since the 1700s because, since then, the people have demanded their democratic right to rule. If anyone is weak, it's the people who elect poor representatives to high office.
@stefashaler8340 One,the right of the Monarch to dissolve parliament was removed a long time ago at the behest of politicians who wanted to ignore parts of the Magna Carta,which is basically our bill of rights.Governments here tend to ignore it totally to maintain control of the proles.As for Charlie working hard do me a favour,it may be tiresome,irksome to him but that's all.
Poor british girls who have suffered so much, now have to endure this rejection and humiliation. These are our people, but the hierarchy do not care😢 its so sad.
It’s not looking good for Charles we know he’s WEF like Starmer, his speech was an utter disgrace for someone who is head of the Church of England and all I can say is he and this Labour government are so out of touch of what the British people want.
Iv always been a royalist but I’m sorry to say I do think its time King Charles stands up and becomes a man and king instead of Faffing around trying to please all the wrong people 🤷♀️
The king is already disliked after that so called Christmas message. If could have come straight out of Starmers mouth! The king needs to tread carefully?
@@chuckmaddison2924he did and she gave him the nod . I was in Whitlam’s electorate and I remember it well when the GG came back to Oz and said he had royal approval . Don’t believe those who tell u otherwise . Smoke and mirrors bs to deny it .
I've always been a monarchist but i have absolutely no time for Charlie. He's a spineless clown. It's no wonder our beloved late Queen worked 2:for so long ... she would have known what he would be like once crowned. He really doesn't care about his people... I still can't believe he said he is now Defender of The Faiths (not Faith.)
When the public throws a tizzy over the possibility of King Charles maybe stepping out of his lane by making a political remark, which he hasn't since acceding to the throne, how would it go over if the King denied the will of the people by dissolving their democratically elected government? I can't imagine King Charles would ever be rash enough or uninformed enough to dissolve a Parliament during times when the country is functioning as a democracy. Imagine the chaos.
King Charles is not a patch on his Mother! He is weak, floundering unable ( or unwilling) to make decisions. Wanting to be the leader of all faiths is not being loyal to this country. I’m sorry that he has prostrate cancer, but so do 1,000s of others, all having to deal with it in their own way, not getting the support that Charles is! Charles has always had a petulant attitude, his Mother knew how to deal with him. But sadly not having her steadying influence & being indulged by sycophants he now does as he pleases, without Consideration of his subjects or Country. His “darling boy” runs Roughshod over him & continually embarrasses the RF & Charles does nothing!😡 His prime minister is so corrupt it defies belief! 😡 but Charles thinks he’s a good guy (😳🙄like Jimmy Saville) & does nothing about it. Charles needs to behave as a King & stand and be recognised, or abdicate & let William lead this country 😡😡
@@denisebrockton2947 To be honest I have never had any time for any of them, the Queen knighted Blair despite a petition with well over a million signatures. The difference is that she kept quiet on things while Charles can’t keep his trap shut!
In a way I agree with Elon, we need to get Starmer & his cronies out but not sure the King should be the one to dissolve Parliament; people object to how they think he meddles in other things though that is for good and so he would be wrong if he does, and seen as wrong by others if he doesn't. The problem is that we, the people, elect the government in a Constitutional Monarchy and so King Charles is supposed to respect that decision. In addition, King Charles is battling cancer and that could prove difficult, stressful. I don't believe this will negatively impact KC reign overall. Starmer, if still anti Monarchy, should return his Knighthood and as for Khan, he should never accepted it, especially given the huge push against it and awareness of public feeling through the online petition.
Wow, just wow. It breaks my heart to see what is happening to the people of the UK. Thankfully, bad though our labour government was, they weren't as bad as yours and I struggle to think how this is all going to be resolved. My thoughts and prayers go out to all of you 💔❤🩹🇳🇿
It'll just get ignored - Parliament are under no obligation to even heed its existence unfortunately. How convenient for them ! We're stitched up like kippers !
the people of this country should lobby their MP and demand that they should listen to the views and feelings of their constituents and support them not bow and scrape to a dictatorial Stalinist leader , the power is in the peoples hands .
I don’t think the king will dissolve parliament he is in cahoots with them! I have always been a great royalist and I loved the Queen - I was disgusted with the King’s speech and I lost all respect for him! If the King does not support his people it will spell the end of the monarch!
The King cannot dissolve Parliament unless instructed to do so by the Prime minister and the Privy Council. He cannot speak out against government policies or criticise their actions. We have a Constitutional Monarchy and not an Absolute one.
It's easy all the King has to do is to address Parliament and say he is dissatisfied with the way the Labour Government are treating his citizen. Labour would be finished and a new election would be called.
The King is not allowed into Parliament unless invited, which he is only for the State Opening of Parliament. How do you suggest he breaks in, breaking the rules of our Constitutional Monarchy at the same time?
Mr Musk does speak for many Brits. He’s so right in what he says. No one in the U.K. dare say anything for fear of being locked up in this Stalin-like state.
If the King us well enough to publicly deal with Starmer, he is well enough to deal with his son's wife, Markle. Dissolve parliament, dissolve Megan and stop thw Megan Markle proxy reign.
With What Has Happened With The Kings Health And All The Problems. The Best Thing He Could Do Is Dissolve Parliament. It’s Is Last Chance For Forgiveness Before He Has To Depart If He Declines
I don’t believe The King will do anything. Look at his son. Im so sorry to say he appears to be a wimpy king. I don’t believe that His Mother The Wonderful Queen would have stopped this mess before allowing the reputation of The Monarchy to be destroyed. Just saying opinion from abroad.
Queen Elizabeth II never dissolved Parliament throughout any of the terrible crises in her reign. A Monarch has not dissolved Parliament since the 1700s. The people elected the government and, in a Constitutional Monarchy, the Monarch is expected to respect the will of the people. King Charles isn't even allowed to attend a conference on the environment. Imagine the stink if he took over Parliament! If you think King Charles is wimpy, you aren't paying attention. He is highly disciplined, knows his role and carries out his duties with distinction. He is strong enough not to engage in quixotic macho displays, like interfering in his son's life, that would tarnish the dignity of the Crown. Harry is adult with the right to say and do as he wishes within the law, like everyone else. King Charles is mature enough, like his mother and father before him, to know his remit and stay within its boundaries.
@@AnnieH-1 What do you know about Klaus Schwab? Have you read any of his books? Or attended any of the WEF meetings? There is no evidence that King Charles is involved with the WEF in any fashion other than being a key-note speaker as most influential people in the world have been. And, King Charles has proven his high intelligence repeatedly, not only by being deeply informed on a multitude of subjects but by his visionary contributions to The Prince's Trust, environmentalism and heritage projects among other accomplishments.
It is a mess. The king should be non political. He does a few duties and has wealth. This is all about society and dignitaries who have a position in society and allowed to remain. Recent events have proved that the poor are being squeezed and the pillars of society are not doing their tasks in a honourable way. Next may come the downfall of the royals if this mess is not sorted out. The king is of the woke mentality and mindful of the WEF who want to change society to have control .
King Charles is mature and wise enough to know his role and the limits to his authority. The people elected the government and, in a Constitutional Monarchy, the Monarch is expected to respect the will of the people. Technically, he could dissolve Parliament, which hasn't;'t been enacted since the 1700s. When the public throws a fit if the King even attends an environmental conference, do you believe he could really dissolve Parliament in today's democratic context?
Queen Elizabeth II, if you remember as Head of State of Australia through her Governor General, Sir John Kerr, in the 1975 Dismissal dismissed the Australian Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam. But then Queen Elizabeth had a backbone unlike the vacillating and tone deaf King Charles who could with more good reason rid us of the truly awful Starmer.
Can I ask why Queen Elizabeth dismissed Gough Witlam? What did he do wrong? I wasn't born at time, and needless to say we never learnt about this in school. I'd love to know! 🇦🇺
If you Google Gough Whitlam-it will tell you why he was dismissed. I’ve met the man twice in my lifetime and on both occasions he was an absolute gentleman and spoke and listened respectfully.
We could name all the families that are still grieving, that's who I am thinking of. It seems that their actions tell us that they really don't care about them and that's what I find hard.
I am so grateful for Elon Musk, I feel he is saving our country, I don't recognise the King for standing by and watching this disaster, I was a Royalist, I'm 75 not anymore I see an uncaring rich man not a King of the realm.
If the King still has the power to dissolve parliament, I suggest a referendum by the people to show just how we feel. This would give all parties an honest viewpoint allowing the government and /or the King to do the right and honourable thing with-ought the naysayers trying to blame his Majesty for taking any steps the country deemed necessary.
Good day Neil 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 King Charles should do this! It would increase support for the monarchy! Bc he’d be doing something for the people. They’d applaud it.
your king will not lift a finger to do what is right, namely to dissolve this nest of traitors which is parliament, so he will simply show himself good for nothing. which is to be entirely expected
It has been said by the public that KC111, should dissolve parliament. Otherwise, apart from playing a role to the public and dignitaries, the Monachy has no place in today's society.
What the heck is the King doing, he’s the head of the country, stand up for it or maybe someone can do a better job. While he’s at it drop the Americans from the web site. Make a damn stand instead of standing idle and letting it crumble around you.
It will cause a constitutional crisis, resulting in the elected parliament moving to abolish the monarchy. Once they get that done, they will extend their term of office and eventually elections will become a thing of the past.
@@sheilalumb5150 meanwhile the MP's are claiming thousands in heating allowances and getting subsidized meals, all at the tax payers expense but nobody worries about that. At least the monarchy are good for the economy, promoting the UK and bringing in tourists. Catherine alone is said to bring in a billion pounds a year in trade for the UK fashion industry.
@@sheilalumb5150educate yourself on the monarchy and money and how it works, ,but it’s ok we give millions and millions every year to unvetted immigrants,yourself included.
Kier should surrender his knighthood being anti monarchy. . He should never have accepted the honour. Hypocrite.
He won't do that as he thinks the title makes him superior to us 'ordinary' people
It was a gift from Teflon Tony Bliar for his failures at the CPS
If Two Tier had his way there would be no Monarchy he thinks they are unnecessary you can almost hear him shouting 'chop off their heads' The King must know Starmer has no allegiance to the Crown and should never have been Knighted. The other fool shouldn't be either that idiot Mayor of London he has insulted the Monarchy this last week made a joke of being Knighted.
You don't nee to be monarchist. As long as there is no other option to award people officially by the state, this the is the only option and thus for all no matter what is your political opinion. The list of the people to be awarded is not created by the royals, but by a committee.
Nobody likes privilege more than socialists...
THE KING should listen to his people, this government is bringing the country down.
Brian doesn't give a flying #, he's part of the globalist elite that's destroying our country.
People gave their life fighting for King and country,it's time the King stood up for his people!!!!!
@@JohnG11000 The Monarchy has no power whatsoever - it is a constitutional monarchy.
@@DavideMazzetti You’re naive or just won’t admit it. Your tampon king has always been involved (interfered) in your gov politics. He is the real problem with your now Unconstitutional Monarchy.
Charlie is a puppet of unelected organisations. It won't happen.
so if Keir hates the Monarchy why is he a SIR?
Money and prestige.
Hypocrisy.
Ironic, isn't it? 🤔
His mate Ali has one as well...and that weasel khan....looks as though anyone who owns a carpet runner gets one for....???? Knighthoods going Cheap as chips these days!.
@@sparkypete3417 very much agreed!! Everyone except Becks, who actually accomplished something, seems to get one. The justice who threw out Megs' case, giving her the win, was made a LORD. ....even after he fell for her ''the emails self delete after a month'' story. All the best to you in 2025! Kind of hope you get a knighthood!!
Anyone who says "...diversity of culture, ethnicity and Faith provides strength, not weakness. " is part of the problem and the reason for these atrocities against children.
We have this in Canada and it is called multiculturalism. It is our strength.
@@carolzippel5021 це ви так думаєте. а насправді ви так кучкуєтеся, поки вам вигідно
I will scream if anyone says it to me sick of that sentence.
@@carolzippel5021
Trudeau voter?
Canada is ruined
Our children
Anti monarchist yet accepted the ‘Sir’ effing hypocrite.
The only men I call Sir are those who are respectful, truthful, and have earned the title. Being Knighted now means nothing more than being given a piece of toilet roll to wipe your nose with.
Because it generated more freebies..... years ago a Knighthood represented integrity
Khunt too
I hope someone publicly challenges him on this! We've not seen proof he returned the money given him by his mutual millionaire friend. As a retired nurse it was made clear we did not accept gifts as they could be seen as bribes and back handers. We all know he know the rules or he wouldn't have challenged others on the subject!! Can't stand the man. He's not to be trusted!
Like Khan
Rayners £68000 vanity photography = 340 fuel allowance this government is an insult to the people.
Horrid selfish self serving woman.
Indeed. This, and Stalin accepting (and keeping!) a knighthood is yet more hypocrisy from the Left that we've come to expect.
Need a fucking good camera to make her look better
i don't think he is just her photographer 😉😉😉
I wonder if the camera lense survived. LOL.
Disgusting LABOUR party 🤮🤮🤮
i thought they were the party of the poorer working class....then the first thing they do is take away pensioners' heating allowance while giving themselves fully paid for mansions. It's like Canada....our working man's party leader wears a $5,000 Rolex and armani suits
@@LizbethGerowThey've not been for the working man/woman since the 80s/90s when the lunatic left started taking over with their Marxist crap.
They need to change their name, they are NOT a LABOUR government.
Despicable bunch of amateurs pretending to be politicians
I 100% agree, but they shouldn't even be referred to as Labour, should officially be called Liebour in view of their current attacks on us British ordinary indigenous citizens.
Starmer's hypocrisy is staggering.
The King should dissolve parliament and revoke starmer's knighthood. The debate resulting from the petition for another general election begins on Monday. He needs to listen to the public.
Wait until Trump gets in, he and Charles are close, he is the only one he will deal with as the government are complicit in election interference. He could force another general election.
Over 3.million petition signatures and growing by the hour !!!👍👍👍
Knights of the round coffee table
Will never happen. This is wishful thinking at its finest.
he never has before. I don't know why Charles would start now. (sorry bad day)
I'm out of money, can't get any more electric on my stick till i get my pension in 5 days. Bastards won't kill me. I refuse to allow it. Wouldn't give them the pleasure of saving my pension. Oh and their's snow due in two days. Looks like I'm set for my longest lie in ever. At least my beds warm 🙊 And i don't want sympathy, I've been through worse. I want this labour party out. Unfortunately a lot of pensioners aren't as robust as me, they're the ones who need help.
Bless you. It’s dreadful what’s happening
Just hope you didn’t vote Labour? Many are regretting the party that they chose and put their “X” against it.
Please try to keep warm buddy. I hate what they have done to you
God bless you sir. devastating. i would suggest that you send your energy provider a conditional offer to use what you want and pay what you can afford. research common law initiatives in the freedom movement . There is representation across the whole of the UK for people seeking sovereignty. Richard Vobes has interviewed many of them. unfortunately social media and big tech are burying these initiatives.
You should request your pension to be paid weekly I got mine that way so I can budget better
How can Starmer walk about sporting a knighthood and be opposed to the Royal family?
As most other “brass necked” politicians (mainly Labour) do! Head held high and impervious to the cat calling going on behind his back.
@@zillyg21Pity the blade didn't slip.
@@zillyg21 He is deservedly getting the cat calling to his face now, but it'll make no difference, he has a hide like a rhino.
The King doesn’t care about us - his subjects. He’s hand-in-glove with the WEF - ‘our wants & needs’ come waay down his list.
Money speaks volumes 👌👍
Charles lost the public when he showed support for Starmers handling of Stockport and endorsing his ‘friendship’ with Khan.
One thousand per cent.,Never again will I support the RF or a monarchy. The traitor king.
Charles and the monarchy are central to everything bad that we're living through. Only need to look at his Christmas speech (and the deleted version!) for an example
Lost me long before that
Oh FGS. Do some research and you might discover how powerless the King is, and what a tight rope he has to walk with this republican government!
@ FGs, Charles is not utterly powerless. He made his feelings known when he praised Starmers action. I give Charles kudos for going and talking to the people and not doing a runner like Starmer does when the going gets tough. Charles is surrounded by his wef members. Anything he wants done for himself, he gets. I bet his milk herd are not being given gates fart feed. He praised Khans green agenda that is just a tax revenue scheme and does nothing for the environment. But don’t worry, Charles has never sat in a traffic jam in London in his life. I have no doubt life is very hard for him right now, but he can slink off to High-grove or one of his many house bolt holes to get peace and quiet.
I agree with Elon. The King must know the pain this government is causing the British People. Come in King Charles, you must use your power, and quick!!
A British Monarch has not dissolved Parliament since the 1700s. That is because the British people do not accept the Monarch interfering in a democratically elected government. The people run the government through their elected officials, not the Monarchy.
The king can’t dissolve parliament, only the PM can do that
@@roslynclark6690Technically the Monarch can dissolve Parliament but this hasn't been done for hundreds of years
@@stefashaler8340 Exactly, it's nonsense for anyone to lay that responsibility and poisoned chalice at King Charles door!
@@roslynclark6690 Technically, the King can dissolve Parliament but it hasn't been done since the 1700s. Also, as Head of State, the Monarch is constitutionally bound to follow the advice of the government. I can't even imagine what kind of crisis it would take to force a Monarch to dissolve Parliament today. Something like this happened in Australia in 1975 when the government was totally deadlocked and the Governor-General, who is appointed by the Prime Minister as representative of the Queen,, dismissed Parliament. But, according to the Australian Constitution, the Queen has no part in the decisions of their Governor-General.
Go one step further and take away the knighthood from the London mayor. Could be the shortage peerage in history.
They won’t, but he did remove the knighthood from two Indian men for speaking out against Islam
A knighthood is not a peerage
He should never have got a knighthood in the first place
Hear! Hear! He is pure evil!
And the diabolical act by these mp's gifting all their buddy's knighthoods when they are sacked should be abolished, it's just a licence to stick two fingers up at the taxpayers and rip us off big time, that's if they don't fall asleep for the twenty minutes they are required to actually be in the house of spongers.
I AGREE WITH ELON
He needs to keep his snout out of OUR politics! 🤬
@@noniousxltruffles7454True but then Kier Starmer didn't keep out of the US politics did he? He sent his people over to allegedly influence voters!
@noniousxltruffles7454 So it's OK for liebour to send 100 party apparatchiks to help Kamala Hyena Harris win😂Political interference has been happening between nations for centuries,I suggest you read a bit of history.
@@noniousxltruffles7454 Starmer didn't keep out of the US Election. The new President and his team will be dealing with the UK government in future. They will have an opinion
@@noniousxltruffles7454 he’s entitled to an opinion. Starmer sent his minions over to the US to try and sway the outcome of their elections, remember? Works both ways.
This is appalling. Think of the pensioners while the elite are sitting pretty.
Shutting off people's heat is wicked!! It's illegal in my state in the US.
It is illegal in the UK as well. If you don't pay your bill then a PAYG meter is installed. If you don't feed the meter then it cuts off automatically, then you freeze but the company can not actually cut you off itself. Many of our OAPs are already on meters and so will need to make a couple of choices either freeze or starve to death, or be cold and hungry at the same time. I don't that this measure will cost more than maybe 100 lives and these will be those who are already having great difficulty surviving on their own as it is. The main point is why should our OAPs suffer at all or be made to feel that they are some kind of unwelcome or unwanted burden on society? My 88 year old mother does not need any charity, trust me on that one, but this makes her no less upset, indeed angry. The savings are tiny compared to what our government chooses to utterly waste the tax payers money on, so why do it at all?
The message to all of our OAPs is clear. The State does not want you anymore. With all of your many and growing medical issues, it is costing us a fortune to keep you alive in your own home only to cost even more when you finally need to go into care. Therefore we would very much prefer that you died or other how buggered off ASAP. We have had your taxes and all of the other profit from your hard work and we are now taxing your children, grandchildren and greatgrandchildren into poverty, so quite frankly we really don't need you cluttering up the place anymore. It is well past time you slung your hook as we have a few million boat people already lined up for your council flat.
The clear messaging alone will finish off a few years earlier far more OAPs than it will either starve or freeze.
The government has not shut off heating if you are of a certain age your heating cannot be turned off what the government has done is stop the heating allowence to all pensioners only those on benefits get it ,which leaves a majority worrying how they going to get through a cold winter
@@bowlingbill9633when the energy company forces you to have a Pay And Go Meter and your pension doesn’t stretch to the highest electricity charges in Europe (go Google that and compare) and you run out of money before your next pension date arrives: you are cut off. So whether they stop supplying you with electricity at their end or they install their equipment to cut you off at your end-the aim and the result are the same. It’s just that when they cut you off at your end they can tell people they didn’t do it, you did, and people believe the narrative and blame the pensioner for spending their hard earned pension in frivolities like food 😢
@@bowlingbill9633: If you don't pay the bill, a prepaid meter is installed. This effectively means, if you don't keep the meter in credit you don't get any supply.
So again it comes down to feeding the meter with credits to keep warm, or buying food.
Some Pensioners miss out on Pension Credits by just a few pounds and are therefore not entitled to the Winter Fuel Allowance.
Meanwhile we send millions of taxpayer's money abroad on stupid projects.
Wasteful and stupid. We just sent millions to Syria. We waste millions every day on benefits for illegal immigrants, go figure.
The sooner we are rid of Sneer Starmer and his Labour Government the better, in my opinion.
A more useless collection of individuals, than our present Government, it would be hard to imagine.
@@garypowell1540some excellent points well made. Hope you have made your MPs aware of it ! They are choosing to ignore their constituents!
King Charles should be looking out for his people not his little friends
There is an whole Nation hoping the KING will act and dissolve parliament and save our country from destruction.
And they will be disappointed!
He's about as useful as a cow with a trumpet.
You have many in the Commonwealth of Nations standing with you against the tyranny of this Labor Government. You folk should be heartened that so many throughout the world wish only the best for your great nation and its people. But wishes and prayers can only go so far. Especially heartening should be the fact that Elon Musk, with all the resources and influence he possesses also does not want to see the UK 'destroyed'.
@RobynRobinson-z9x
You had me right up to your support for that ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT Musk.
He needs to keep his beak OUT of UK politics 🤬
Having bought the US presidency for CONVICTED CRIMINAL really DOES NOT make him some political expert.
It simply shows how CORRUPT the pair of them are!
I have cried about how are country is being destroyed and now they want to take away thousands of years of our history like we never existed
@@gabriellerochelle4367Excuse the levity,but we are being whitewashed from history by marxist lunatics,we need to rise up en masses to stop this.
These Labour front bench women talk rough really common embarrassing
I'm working class through and through but agree with you . I cringe every time they open their gobs
I’m not concerned about their poor elocution, I’m more concerned with their (apparent) lack of intellect.
@@MsJk29I'm concerned about both....terrible diction and hours of saying very little..no political skills and from what I can see..little integrity or ability to read the room.
And the thought of Rainer gaining control when the Fuhrer is sacked is very worrying indeed.
I feel sorry for the UK because of your evil government that's in power. Not that our Aussie PM is much better.
Albanese is just as bad imo. We Aussies were lucky he spent his first 2 years pushing yes for the voice referendum. Labor is spending tax payer dollars like drunken sailors.
@@ozmag8017 💯
The people voted them in! Grief knows why but they did.
Is your goverment also a WEF club member?🙄
South Africa ... hold my beer
The king must dissolve parliament immediately Labour is running England to the ground
That is the plan
And do what? The King CANNOT call an election, only the PM can do that.
So whats the point of the House of.Lords? Thought they were suppose to kerp the government in check? Or because Starmers cronies are getting knighthoods out of crisp packets thesedays is in now in cheque?
They’ve been doing it In Wales for the past 25 years. There is no industry left here.
Not just England,Britain......
Do it King Charles.
I have seen many tweets from people asking, begging Elon Musk to help the UK, unlike our King Elon has responded. What the hell has happened to our beautiful United Kingdom.
Constitutionally, the King is forbidden from speaking out against the government.
Liberal idiots have ruined it.
Due to the king gifting tinKhan, creator of Londonstan, membership of the house of spongers now, he ain't my king anymore.
I think the King should Dissolve the government because if he doesn't Starmer in time will Dissolve him and abolish the royalty he's already said it.
Very true, but keep in mind Stasi Starmer pledged before the election that he would dissolve the so called house of lords(spongers), and less than four weeks later he wriggled his way out of that fake pledge.
Starmer should resign
If Charles does dissolve parliament, his popularity will increase 100% in popularity!!
Come on Charles show us your a king of this country!
Charles is a weak man who doesn't like confrontation, apparently. But then it's easy for him as he is a multi, multi billionaire. He will do nothing, in my opinion.
If King Charles does dissolve Parliament, the Monarchy will end. He cannot dissolve a legitimately elected Government. That's why we have "His Majesty's opposition" to put pressure on the Government of the day.
Dissolve.Parliament! Then what?! He CANNOT call an election . So you'd have a minority government, with the opposition having a huge majority! How on earth could that work?!
@@sueharwood6681 true he could not dissolve a junior aspirin.
But the King can only dissolve Parliament if instructed to do so by the Prime minister and the Privy Council.
The optics are looking bad. Blaming fathers for trying to rescue their daughters is wrong. Arresting 13yrs olds and saying they are to blame is ignorant.
Look how things are done in those countries. As often as not in the circumstances similar to those in question the women are blamed so this is not surprising.
Please help your people King Charles, dissolve parliament and sack the labour party
An anti-monarchist marked for a knighthood would reject their nomination. Just goes to show, Starmer has no moral backbone. His beliefs blow with the wind and cannot be trusted an inch.
Hello Neil,
I couldn't agree with Elon Musk more....King Charles does need to dissolve this government before they do any more damage. They've done nothing but lie and seem to forget that it's us paying their salaries. Labour needs to go!
Penny from Christchurch. 🇬🇧
The British people elected the government. In a constitutional Monarchy, the King is expected to respect the will of the people.
@stefashaler8340 you're quite right, but he can also see that the country is going to hell in a handcart and he knows we were lied to and continue to be lied to. Trouble is, he's a Globalist as well and lacks a backbone.
@@stefashaler8340then why did the queen do it to Australia.
@@stefashaler8340They won by voter apathy and a lot of illegal postal voting from a certain demographic.
If the King does not act then he is destroying his country as well imo
That ship sailed when he doubled down on starmers far right hate speech
Charles knows what side his bread is buttered on. He hates the common folk and won’t come to their aid.
He is also destroying the royal family.
@ yes by destroying the Monarchy then the Commonwealth is destroyed and laws and the countries become up for picking and more Chaos is created for the One World Order agenda
Aren’t they both bonafide members of the 🌎 economic forum?
Who on earth voted Jess Philips, Angela Rayner and all of the labour rabble into office?
Thank you for bringing us, what was an uncomfortable video report. It's got to be said, and who better to say it?
Not the majority,that I do know they're all bloody evil or delulu 😢😢 Kath....Yorkshire England
Happy New Year Kev, I hope you and the little one are both well. Pen 🙋 xx
@ Happy new year Pen. Been looking for you, and glad to see your comment. Are you ok? I’m ok, and Thelma is doing brilliantly well.
@cakehole53 I'm fine thanks Kev. I completely lost YT for a while, then I couldn't comment but it seems OK now. I'm so pleased to hear that things are going well with Thelma....she's a lucky girl....she's got a good "dad" ~ bless you both. xx
Complete morons voted Labour, the writing was on the wall ,they were too busy looking the other way., or couldn't be bothered to go and vote.
I was a Royalist but after the speech which i know everyone loved, sorry i didn't, i dont feel he now is strong enough to stand up for his people and the church.. 😢
And what have they just done, gave out a knighthood to someone that doesn't respect the Royals. 🤔 or the English people
Everyone did not love it
I’m a Royalist through and through but Charles’s speech infuriated me🤷♀️. He needs to abdicate and give the reins to William who is a much stronger man imo!
The King delivers speeches approved by the Prime Minister. Also, the Honours committee decides who is to receive an honour. Their list is sent to the Prime minister for his approval, the King has no say in it.
You are SO wrong! Most people thought his speech was appalling, and proves what side he's on. Clue...it's NOT the true British people!
😖🇬🇧
@@ladychatelaine697💯%
I agree with Elon because if this party doesn't get kicked out will not have a country left in 4 years to call Britain
Aren't political parties kicked out by elections? The British government was elected by the people. To "kick it out" would be total disrespect for the democratic process. That is a matter for the people, not the King.
@@stefashaler8340yes but the next general election won't be until 2029
Agree. It’s hard to believe any leader could be worse than Biden but Starmer is just as bad AND he’s moving at breakneck speed without any fear of consequences. Biden had to put effort into covering up and he had to contend with Congress. Starmer is just a wrecking ball with no off switch.
@@judewebb5694 It sounds as if that will be along wait for some people. Can't an election be called earlier by a vote of non-confidence?
You are only reading the views of anti-Labour disgruntled right wing voters. The present government was democratically elected with a huge majority. Please do not assume that their rants reflect the opinions of the whole British electorate. When they speak of "the people" , they mean people who share their own political ideology. Plenty don't.@@ChristianLife888
I'm not sure KC has the backbone to intervene
The king should take responsibility and do the right thing for his subjects. He should apologize for knighting Khan and tell us why? If he can't/will not do what is right, he should step down! I am done with royalty now that the Queen is gone. King Charles has let his mother and the British people down, and that is considered betrayal.
KC look after your people , this is not weakness , you need to step in otherwise you have no kingdom
True his admired islam will take it from him.
He gives so much from his private income towards the good of the people. He is a good man. But he has no executive power.
@@evelynhillier2877 I believe that but he has to have some kind of understanding where the Uk is heading , he does have power if he chooses to
The king should do something , the people are suffering ,
I welcome Trump, Musk, et al, and hope they have a positive effect on UK.
The people who are occupying those homes should be required to hire their own staff and pay them from their own wages. The citizens shouldn’t have to pay for their luxuries. Pay their own heating, food and garden services. It’s not on the “People” to make a comfortable life for them.
CHARLES IS LETTING EVERYONE DOWN, WHAT WITH ANDREW HARRY AND MAGOT, ITS TIME TO STAND UP
I was a true patriotic Royalist, but since Khan got knighted I’ve now got no respect for them.
He’s no longer my King. 🤬
The King does not decide who gets a gong. The Monarch rarely decides who gets a gong. It is determined by committee.
Yes, you’re right about the committee, but I still thought the Monarch had the last say.
If I’m wrong, then I stand corrected. 🤕🗡️🤴
Chuck and Starmer are in the same Club. The ddd pop club.
From what I've read, it's the government who decide who is to be knighted, not the king! However, I did think there was a way he could decline it, but I'm not sure.@stevengrant1319
The king sat there with his crown on his head reading out all the promises Labour had instructed him to read out! Now Labour has reneged on these promises,,,all complete lies…the King should dissolve this government or he’s complicit in these lies himself!
He's showing himself to be a King in name Only.
On the contrary, he's standing up against ill informed idiots who think this is a good idea.
@@pickledelliesLabour voter.
@pickledellies how's the heat in your castle this winter 😂
@@Arthurianski On the contrary, I think the whole labour party is an abhorrence. And Keir Starmer an Orwellian nightmare. I want him evicted from number 10 as quickly and legally as possible. And I want the lazy electorate to get off their behinds and vote for a better government. However, I do not want to destroy the country, to make my wish come true. Which is what will happen if the King dissolves Parliament.
@@transitfran1126 Good grief. Labels. Boxes. Apparently they don't only come from the Left Wing.
I DO agree with Elon Musk 👍🏻👍🏻
Totally agree 💯 Elon with the British
He is the wort prime minister we have EVER had...he is out no question of it...
The King is not a strong King. When you compair him to his sister Anne, it shows, as the saying goes, "he wouldn't say boo to a goose". Too many things have been allowed to happen that should not have happened. Money belonging to the British people has been used to house, feed, cloth and keep thousands of strangers who come over the sea and land in our country. Hundreds of thousands of British people are homeless, 1.7 million people can't afford to heat their homes, millions can't afford to buy food. The King should speak out against rob Peter to pay Paul attitudes. Policies being proposed and implemented by the Labour Party, and supported by the far left, are draining Britain and robbing the British people.
Anne couldn't sack the PM , any more than the King is able to dodge the rules and throw his weight around. Another Charles, the Third, tried that...
I haven't forgotten that the king stated a few months ago that Britain should allow ALL so called asylum seekers( illegal invaders) into our country, shows just how out of touch he is with the state HIS country is in.
The king has shown his hand and no, he will not intervene! As his father said, he is weak.
He's a woke fool.
It is for "His Majesty's opposition" to do something. A legitimately elected Government (ie, a parliament by the people) cannot be over thrown by the King, ( the people).
King Charles is not weak. A look at his long record of service and standing strong through all kinds of conflicts proves that. His schedule alone would grind a lot of people half his age to dust. He knows his role as a Constitutional Monarch is to respect the will of the people who elected the government. The King is not prone to weak, macho, impulsive acts that would tarnish the dignity of the Crown and throw the country into chaos. Parliament has not been dissolved by a Monarch since the 1700s because, since then, the people have demanded their democratic right to rule. If anyone is weak, it's the people who elect poor representatives to high office.
@stefashaler8340 One,the right of the Monarch to dissolve parliament was removed a long time ago at the behest of politicians who wanted to ignore parts of the Magna Carta,which is basically our bill of rights.Governments here tend to ignore it totally to maintain control of the proles.As for Charlie working hard do me a favour,it may be tiresome,irksome to him but that's all.
@@pickledelliesno he’s not good god
Charlie boy has yet to show that he is a King
I never thought I'd agree 👍 💯 but I do now
He's just a figurehead I dont think he can do anything anyway, Dennis
King of lies
He's a CONSTITUTIONAL King, he has no power. Look it up if you don't know what it means!!
Really how can we keep warm nobody speaks nobody rings we are left to get on with it!! Come on King Charles PLEASE help us
And as expected he's proving to be as useless as some of us have ALWAYS believed he would.
He's not a fan of the King, yet I bet he could not get to the palace quick enough when a knighthood was on offer .............what a hypocrite.
Poor british girls who have suffered so much, now have to endure this rejection and humiliation. These are our people, but the hierarchy do not care😢 its so sad.
Why do they get knighted there A bunch of HYPOCRITES IMO
We live in hope that the king stands by his people
Don’t make me laugh , KC couldn’t give a toss about us
It’s not looking good for Charles we know he’s WEF like Starmer, his speech was an utter disgrace for someone who is head of the Church of England and all I can say is he and this Labour government are so out of touch of what the British people want.
Iv always been a royalist but I’m sorry to say I do think its time King Charles stands up and becomes a man and king instead of Faffing around trying to please all the wrong people 🤷♀️
The king is already disliked after that so called Christmas message. If could have come straight out of Starmers mouth! The king needs to tread carefully?
The King should dissolve the government, but he won't.
The Queen authorised the disposal of Whitlam in Australia. So it can be done.
Authorised is same as ordering is it? Do explain to us idiots how this is done.
No she didn't! She made it clear in a letter to the GG that she wouldn't interfere; it was up to us as a nation to sort it out.
@@tombradshaw5164 I thought GG went to Queen to get the ok.
@@chuckmaddison2924he did and she gave him the nod . I was in Whitlam’s electorate and I remember it well when the GG came back to Oz and said he had royal approval . Don’t believe those who tell u otherwise . Smoke and mirrors bs to deny it .
@KAJAMAJA122 I was always sure GG needed approval. Otherwise, could do what they like with no checks.
I've always been a monarchist but i have absolutely no time for Charlie. He's a spineless clown.
It's no wonder our beloved late Queen worked 2:for so long ... she would have known what he would be like once crowned.
He really doesn't care about his people... I still can't believe he said he is now Defender of The Faiths (not Faith.)
I have had the strong feeling for months now that the King should dissolve parliament
When the public throws a tizzy over the possibility of King Charles maybe stepping out of his lane by making a political remark, which he hasn't since acceding to the throne, how would it go over if the King denied the will of the people by dissolving their democratically elected government? I can't imagine King Charles would ever be rash enough or uninformed enough to dissolve a Parliament during times when the country is functioning as a democracy. Imagine the chaos.
This must remain as headlines until it’s stopped !, it’s a national disgrace
The King needs to distance himself from Starmer, or he will be in trouble with the public
Do as I say not as I do. That’s Labour for YOU 💯%👍
It’s about Time the King stuck up for THE SUBJECT,S
Stick
@@jeanettealexander2919The sentence as a whole is not grammatically correct.
He’s not my King and I am not one of his subjects!
King Charles is not a patch on his Mother! He is weak, floundering unable ( or unwilling) to make decisions.
Wanting to be the leader of all faiths is not being loyal to this country. I’m sorry that he has prostrate cancer, but so do 1,000s of others, all having to deal with it in their own way, not getting the support that Charles is! Charles has always had a petulant attitude, his Mother knew how to deal with him.
But sadly not having her steadying influence & being indulged by sycophants he now does as he pleases, without
Consideration of his subjects or
Country. His “darling boy” runs
Roughshod over him & continually embarrasses the RF
& Charles does nothing!😡
His prime minister is so corrupt it defies belief! 😡 but Charles thinks he’s a good guy (😳🙄like Jimmy Saville) & does nothing about it.
Charles needs to behave as a King & stand and be recognised, or abdicate & let
William lead this country 😡😡
@@denisebrockton2947
To be honest I have never had any time for any of them, the Queen knighted Blair despite a petition with well over a million signatures. The difference is that she kept quiet on things while Charles can’t keep his trap shut!
In a way I agree with Elon, we need to get Starmer & his cronies out but not sure the King should be the one to dissolve Parliament; people object to how they think he meddles in other things though that is for good and so he would be wrong if he does, and seen as wrong by others if he doesn't. The problem is that we, the people, elect the government in a Constitutional Monarchy and so King Charles is supposed to respect that decision. In addition, King Charles is battling cancer and that could prove difficult, stressful. I don't believe this will negatively impact KC reign overall.
Starmer, if still anti Monarchy, should return his Knighthood and as for Khan, he should never accepted it, especially given the huge push against it and awareness of public feeling through the online petition.
There’s a petition! Is it a yougov one? Please let people know where it is so they can sign it.
Wow, just wow. It breaks my heart to see what is happening to the people of the UK. Thankfully, bad though our labour government was, they weren't as bad as yours and I struggle to think how this is all going to be resolved. My thoughts and prayers go out to all of you 💔❤🩹🇳🇿
Sign the petition call for an election end the nightmare!
You think the Nigerian conservative party or any other party are different
Whats that got to do with anything?@65Lynchy
Already signed.
Didn’t do much when people signed against khan getting a knighthood.
It'll just get ignored - Parliament are under no obligation to even heed its existence unfortunately. How convenient for them !
We're stitched up like kippers !
the people of this country should lobby their MP and demand that they should listen to the views and feelings of their constituents and support them not bow and scrape to a dictatorial Stalinist leader , the power is in the peoples hands .
Won't work. They're too busy enjoying their position
I don’t think the king will dissolve parliament he is in cahoots with them! I have always been a great royalist and I loved the Queen - I was disgusted with the King’s speech and I lost all respect for him! If the King does not support his people it will spell the end of the monarch!
I think the time has arrived!
He is not able to by law educate yourself
The King cannot dissolve Parliament unless instructed to do so by the Prime minister and the Privy Council. He cannot speak out against government policies or criticise their actions. We have a Constitutional Monarchy and not an Absolute one.
Good day Neil😊I’m no fan of Kier!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
I do not think that Charles wants the Monarchy to continue after his reign .
It's easy all the King has to do is to address Parliament and say he is dissatisfied with the way the Labour Government are treating his citizen. Labour would be finished and a new election would be called.
The King is not allowed into Parliament unless invited, which he is only for the State Opening of Parliament. How do you suggest he breaks in, breaking the rules of our Constitutional Monarchy at the same time?
The King can dissolve Parliament on the advice of the Prime Minister. He'd be daft to try to unseat his PM, and tip the UK into the unknown.
Mr Musk does speak for many Brits. He’s so right in what he says. No one in the U.K. dare say anything for fear of being locked up in this Stalin-like state.
If the King us well enough to publicly deal with Starmer, he is well enough to deal with his son's wife, Markle. Dissolve parliament, dissolve Megan and stop thw Megan Markle proxy reign.
With What Has Happened With The Kings Health And All The Problems. The Best Thing He Could Do Is Dissolve Parliament. It’s Is Last Chance For Forgiveness Before He Has To Depart If He Declines
I don’t believe The King will do anything. Look at his son. Im so sorry to say he appears to be a wimpy king. I don’t believe that His Mother The Wonderful Queen would have stopped this mess before allowing the reputation of The Monarchy to be destroyed. Just saying opinion from abroad.
Queen Elizabeth II never dissolved Parliament throughout any of the terrible crises in her reign. A Monarch has not dissolved Parliament since the 1700s. The people elected the government and, in a Constitutional Monarchy, the Monarch is expected to respect the will of the people. King Charles isn't even allowed to attend a conference on the environment. Imagine the stink if he took over Parliament! If you think King Charles is wimpy, you aren't paying attention. He is highly disciplined, knows his role and carries out his duties with distinction. He is strong enough not to engage in quixotic macho displays, like interfering in his son's life, that would tarnish the dignity of the Crown. Harry is adult with the right to say and do as he wishes within the law, like everyone else. King Charles is mature enough, like his mother and father before him, to know his remit and stay within its boundaries.
Spot on
She wasn't a Saint just smarter. She allowed Chuck to get involved with Klaus.
@@AnnieH-1 What do you know about Klaus Schwab? Have you read any of his books? Or attended any of the WEF meetings? There is no evidence that King Charles is involved with the WEF in any fashion other than being a key-note speaker as most influential people in the world have been. And, King Charles has proven his high intelligence repeatedly, not only by being deeply informed on a multitude of subjects but by his visionary contributions to The Prince's Trust, environmentalism and heritage projects among other accomplishments.
It is a mess. The king should be non political. He does a few duties and has wealth. This is all about society and dignitaries who have a position in society and allowed to remain. Recent events have proved that the poor are being squeezed and the pillars of society are not doing their tasks in a honourable way. Next may come the downfall of the royals if this mess is not sorted out. The king is of the woke mentality and mindful of the WEF who want to change society to have control .
Let's not forget the current labour bunch was only to eager to mettle in the American election, pay back time 🤔🤔🤔
Corruption so rampant in Labour party affiliates, parliament...
I doubt the King will intervene he will let it play out like he does with the duo.
he may take more notice when Great Britain is given away to the french.
Charles is a bad King, very weak.
But it's continued Year after year.
King Charles is mature and wise enough to know his role and the limits to his authority. The people elected the government and, in a Constitutional Monarchy, the Monarch is expected to respect the will of the people. Technically, he could dissolve Parliament, which hasn't;'t been enacted since the 1700s. When the public throws a fit if the King even attends an environmental conference, do you believe he could really dissolve Parliament in today's democratic context?
Yep. He thinks it will “go away” like his pathetic son and his wife. But he’s exactly wrong. Both issues will blow up in 2025.
Labour, don’t do as I do, but what I say!
Queen Elizabeth II, if you remember as Head of State of Australia through her Governor General, Sir John Kerr, in the 1975 Dismissal dismissed the Australian Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam.
But then Queen Elizabeth had a backbone unlike the vacillating and tone deaf King Charles who could with more good reason rid us of the truly awful Starmer.
Does your king have his ear to the ground at all? He has, it seems, offended many after his Christmas day speech.
@@heatherkay5924No. He has no idea whatsoever.
Can I ask why Queen Elizabeth dismissed Gough Witlam? What did he do wrong?
I wasn't born at time, and needless to say we never learnt about this in school.
I'd love to know! 🇦🇺
If you Google Gough Whitlam-it will tell you why he was dismissed. I’ve met the man twice in my lifetime and on both occasions he was an absolute gentleman and spoke and listened respectfully.
@@katyb2793implementing extreme socialist policies
He cannot sort his son and wife out so I doubt he will do this. I believe they are all in it together, sorry to say, them and us
Charlie boy doesn't care about us commoners, he needs to go along with Starmer.
We could name all the families that are still grieving, that's who I am thinking of. It seems that their actions tell us that they really don't care about them and that's what I find hard.
I am so grateful for Elon Musk, I feel he is saving our country, I don't recognise the King for standing by and watching this disaster, I was a Royalist, I'm 75 not anymore I see an uncaring rich man not a King of the realm.
The king is a paper tiger
The King is a WEF puppet just like Starmer.
A paper muppet.
Thats because the Monarchs powers have been severely limited by Parliament and are purely ceremonial.
wake up wake up UK....
If the king does nothing then he destroys himself
If the King still has the power to dissolve parliament, I suggest a referendum by the people to show just how we feel.
This would give all parties an honest viewpoint allowing the government and /or the King to do the right and honourable thing with-ought the naysayers trying to blame his Majesty for taking any steps the country deemed necessary.
The King is allowed to dissolve Parliament. He is a good King and should prove it by listening to the people.
Only when asked by the PM. His powers are purely ceremonial. Google it !
He or any of them won't be missed. He was so disrespectful for all to see during Remembrance Day at the Cenotaph....
Good day Neil 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 King Charles should do this! It would increase support for the monarchy! Bc he’d be doing something for the people. They’d applaud it.
your king will not lift a finger to do what is right, namely to dissolve this nest of traitors which is parliament, so he will simply show himself good for nothing.
which is to be entirely expected
It has been said by the public that KC111, should dissolve parliament. Otherwise, apart from playing a role to the public and dignitaries, the Monachy has no place in today's society.
Charles is a weak weak man always has been.
He's a Constitutional Monarch, his powers are purely ceremonial. Why don't you know this ?
What the heck is the King doing, he’s the head of the country, stand up for it or maybe someone can do a better job. While he’s at it drop the Americans from the web site. Make a damn stand instead of standing idle and letting it crumble around you.
Whilst still taking hundreds of thousands of pounds of British Taxpayers money to fund his very lavish lifestyle.
It will cause a constitutional crisis, resulting in the elected parliament moving to abolish the monarchy. Once they get that done, they will extend their term of office and eventually elections will become a thing of the past.
@@sheilalumb5150 meanwhile the MP's are claiming thousands in heating allowances and getting subsidized meals, all at the tax payers expense but nobody worries about that. At least the monarchy are good for the economy, promoting the UK and bringing in tourists. Catherine alone is said to bring in a billion pounds a year in trade for the UK fashion industry.
Asking Chaz to do ANYTHING useful is a joke - he is and has ALWAYS BEEN a spoilt, self-serving, brat.
@@sheilalumb5150educate yourself on the monarchy and money and how it works, ,but it’s ok we give millions and millions every year to unvetted immigrants,yourself included.
Starmer and Khan.
If that's the sort of men we're knighting, perhaps the honours system needs a severe shake-up.
Starmer looking after his own, comes to mind!
It needs abolished! Not worth the paper it's written on!