FreeCAD CFD- External Flow Analysis Example|JOKO ENGINEERING|

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Previous Video : • FreeCAD - Run a CFD An...
    Download this model:
    grabcad.com/library/freecad-c...
    AFFILIATE LINKS:
    Get 5% off Alibre Products for U.S. Customers and Support The Channel With My Affialiate Link!
    www.alibre.com/jokohelp/?aff=...
    Kaiweets- Take 10% Off!!
    kaiweets.com?sca_ref=2395368.wlMPzkNLkZ
    coupon code- JL15
    Kaiweets Crimping Tools Set for only $26.00
    Product link: www.gearberry.com/products/ka...
    Discount code: GB10OFF
    local warehouse & free shipping
    SNDWAY Laser Rangefinder for only $48.60
    Product link: www.gearberry.com/products/sn...
    Discount code: GB20OFF
    Free shipping!
    FREE SolidWorks Certification Course
    alison.com/course/solidworks-...
    Idea for a video?
    jokoengineeringhelp@gmail.com
    If there is music in this video, it is legally used.

ความคิดเห็น • 66

  • @icojb25
    @icojb25 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hahaha, I've never been called "knock your socks off amazing" before. Lol. Thanks.

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wow, it's an honor to have one of the developers here. Being on the mechanical side, sometimes the development side feels a bit like magic. Thanks for making your efforts so accessible and making these tools as great as they are.

  • @brunof1734
    @brunof1734 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for the FreeCAD content and CFD analysis. This will help future engineers.

  • @jaco1159
    @jaco1159 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was incredible. As someone with very little experience with CFD I was able to follow along from your download file.

  • @brunof1734
    @brunof1734 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Joko I suggest making FreeCAD videos explaining the Assembly 3 Workbench. As a former Solidworks user I think this workbench is intuitive and in my opinion it should be the main Assembly workbench

  • @dr_workaholic
    @dr_workaholic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love this channel and the work you do. This is my go to source for FreeCAD info, thank you 🙏

  • @SomeTechGuy666
    @SomeTechGuy666 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video. At 20:00 or so you could have made the airplane more visible by decreasing the opacity of the streamlines.
    This the best/easiest/clearest way of meshing for OpenFOAM that I've found. Good work !

  • @c8y8r8
    @c8y8r8 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Joko, you have done a very detailed demo, good job, Bravos

  • @hanshans7491
    @hanshans7491 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this tutorial it's very helpful

  • @Bianchi77
    @Bianchi77 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool tutorial, well done, thanks :)

  • @SomeGuyInSandy
    @SomeGuyInSandy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sweet! it looks fun and frustrating at the same time, lol!

  • @avejst
    @avejst 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, impressive simulation
    A bit difficult thou
    Thanks for sharing your experiences with all of us :-)

    • @Gumball_W
      @Gumball_W ปีที่แล้ว

      Trust me that the CfdOF module in FreeCAD is the most intuitive open-source CFD software. Pretty much everything else (including OpenFOAM itself) requires digging deep in input files and programming languages.

  • @terrylembke8100
    @terrylembke8100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I Liked your simulation video , Joe . great work . If you could do a comparison video on the assembly work benches . Perhaps advantages and disadvantages of each one and maybe with examples ?? I know that may be a lot of work , but please consider . Thank You
    Merry Christmas to you and yours and a great new year to all .
    Kindest Regards
    Terry Lembke

  • @PaukSK
    @PaukSK 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice, thank you.

  • @xelonix_
    @xelonix_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The video I was really looking forward to. Thanks! The streamline results are in MPa or in terms or m/s? Also, it would be best if we have a good Paraview tutorial.

  • @Gumball_W
    @Gumball_W 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This Floating point exception error should disappear without the need to remesh with different size if you just switch initialization from potential flow to specify values (you can leave the default zeros there).

  • @Zaladquiel
    @Zaladquiel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    With Paraview you can use less points (I saw 1000) and downscale the point cloud. Or use a line rather than a sphere for the stream lines. Also turn on the plane geometry.
    Can you do a demonstration with an external flow on a building? If you can generate a CFD flow with atmospheric boundary layer profile (decreasing velocity from the top height to bottom) it would be awesome.

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lets see what I can do on that! I haven't tried using a velocity gradient but I think that would be a super interesting analysis

  • @user-sm4lr6fs9b
    @user-sm4lr6fs9b 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good enjoyed watching stay connected friend..
    Hello Have a great day..🌷

  • @GemstoneActual
    @GemstoneActual ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice walkthrough; thanks.
    Outro sounds Ratatat-ish. ;)

  • @LT72884
    @LT72884 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    awesome video. Thank you for recommending it to me. I do have a question. I am new to CFD. I understand the math very well, but what i am trying to understand is why the negative cut of the plane? why not just leave the plane as a solid? or does freecad not like overlapping geometry? How does having a empty shell vs solid part calculate flow?
    And why do we need a wall? whats its purpose? EDIT: i figured out why we need walls. I didnt catch what you said, but htis box is a "virtual wind tunnel" so no walls would be an issue.
    thanks

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm not a career analyst, so my answer probably isn't the best. Making a negative of the plane establishes the area/boundary that flow will occur in, and allows you to define where the flow starts, ends, what acts as a wall, etc. Great to hear from you, Best!

  • @Poduhvat
    @Poduhvat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is it possible to do wind induced rotation simulation in this software? Like for example to determine wind turbine rotation speed under the influence of wind and rotor power?

    • @Gumball_W
      @Gumball_W ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's possible in OpenFOAM using Arbitrary Mesh Interface and 6 DOF library but it's not supported in CfdOF.

  • @gabril0205
    @gabril0205 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    really interesting! if i wanted to simulate a car including wheel rotation, what should i do?
    can you make a tutorial like this for this topic too?
    thank you very much, very clear video

    • @DANTHETUBEMAN
      @DANTHETUBEMAN 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just model wheels as stationary, I no open wheel will creat wing life effects. I don't think it's enough to worry about. Indi cars stay on the ground

    • @gabril0205
      @gabril0205 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DANTHETUBEMAN thank for the reply!

  • @j121212100
    @j121212100 ปีที่แล้ว

    I could not get anything working with Simscale but have been able to sucessfully get some results using Openfoam workbench for FreeCAD on a laptop with only four cores and 8GB of memory. Workflow seems more streamlined for CFDOF plugin.

  • @rcane6842
    @rcane6842 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you able to put floating debris and able to analyze its behavior as it 'collides' with the aircraft?

    • @Gumball_W
      @Gumball_W ปีที่แล้ว

      It would be extremely difficult to simulate in OpenFOAM, let alone CfdOF. You would likely need FSI and thus coupling with a structural solver (like CalculiX) for this. Even then I'm not sure if contact would work.

  • @SLU2MOVIES
    @SLU2MOVIES 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And I was trying to figure out how to get it running :D yesterday. But damn first I need to install openfoam on windows xD

    • @djdelta777
      @djdelta777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He is using openfoam which is already a workbench within Freecad, so no need to install

  • @c8y8r8
    @c8y8r8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear Sir, I could not fine the CfdOF function in my 0.19 version, is your demo version 2.0 ?

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This will work in version 0.19. Start here and watch subsequent videos.
      th-cam.com/video/eL-YBpC4p6I/w-d-xo.html

  • @Nebb1e
    @Nebb1e 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the video so far, using it for a school project, but a quick question, I made an aircraft in Open-VSP and exported it as an STL, I followed the instructions and couldn't get past the cutting/halving of the plane. It gives me the error "Recompute failed!". if you have any idea on how to fix this it would be greatly appreciated.

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is there anything along the plane body that might register to the kernel as zero thickness geometry?

    • @Nebb1e
      @Nebb1e 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I can't seem to find anything visible that would cause it to be zero thickness, I downloaded your model so I could see how it went but I got another error when computing the mesh in cfdOF, saying that the installation path hasn't been set and couldn't be found.

    • @Nebb1e
      @Nebb1e 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I got the installation path to work, but now i'm getting an error message whenever I click run mesher stating "Meshing exited with error."

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Nebb1e This is a common thing in the world of analysis. Change meshing parameters and mesh types might help. Even consider changing the shape if you need to. Sharp edges and/or unusual angles, unusually small features may all be causes.

  • @c8y8r8
    @c8y8r8 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Sir, my model is not symmetrical in certain wind directions, and therefore I need to include it in the box tunnel. is there a demo for this

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It should work if you make the box go over the whole part instead of half of it

  • @antoine1407
    @antoine1407 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can I export this mesh to openfoam?

  • @jaco1159
    @jaco1159 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a reason we don't enforce no-slip on the surface of the plane? Maybe with air it doesn't have a large impact.

    • @Gumball_W
      @Gumball_W ปีที่แล้ว

      Surface that aren't explicitly selected for boundary conditions have default boundary condition (slip wall) assigned.

  • @Radar_Contact
    @Radar_Contact ปีที่แล้ว

    When I try to remove propeller, also half of the plane disappears. Why is that?

  • @protograde2723
    @protograde2723 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm not getting the plot after running the solver. Am I missing something?

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Possibly. I have a series on setting up FreeCAD for CFD. It requires add ins for some things. This is the first video in the series:
      th-cam.com/video/eL-YBpC4p6I/w-d-xo.html

  • @engineerdeva2975
    @engineerdeva2975 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have simulation of flare or combustion using free Cad

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There wouldn't be a simulation of a combustion itself, you could simulate multiple materials and the flow as they mix and you could do another analysis of what the max possible combustion pressures would be on your components. I haven't heard of FEA that has this capability, but Ansys might since it's so advanced and heavily used in aerospace. Likewise Cyprien Rusu has some good material on FEA, he might have a guide for it on an open source free platform like Salome. feaforall.com

    • @Gumball_W
      @Gumball_W ปีที่แล้ว +1

      OpenFOAM has a special solver called fireFoam for that. But it’s not supported in CfdOF module in FreeCAD.

    • @SomeTechGuy666
      @SomeTechGuy666 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Gumball_W What can't OpenFOAM do ?

  • @cayenne7792
    @cayenne7792 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My first look at FreeCad and all I want to know is: Can you turn off orthographic perspective? And why would you ever turn on an unrealistic 3D view?

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes if I understand your question. View>toggle orthographic or perspective rendering. Not distorting the model for perspective viewing is the standard in every platform I've used, because when modeling it is quite important to have correct, nonscaled features for relations and constraints on external geometry.

    • @cayenne7792
      @cayenne7792 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JokoEngineeringhelp That is what the ortho views are for (top, left, right, back, etc.) Heck make any ortho view ya want with a working plane. My brain struggles to figure out which way the model is orientated with ortho perspective especially in wire frame, no problem at all in normal perspective plus i get to see what the model really looks like especially if we can adjust focal (lens) length

  • @yakdaymar6659
    @yakdaymar6659 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    😀😀😀😀😀

  • @Akwitful
    @Akwitful ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No matter what i do, i get Simulation Error :(

    • @Akwitful
      @Akwitful ปีที่แล้ว

      I do not get the mode: "CorsairResiudals" Just after some second error

  • @joellegge460
    @joellegge460 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    CFD with tetraeder mesh refinement zone is not a good idea

    • @Gumball_W
      @Gumball_W ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s just a surface visualization. If you open the mesh in ParaView (there’s a button for this) you will see that it’s actually a hex mesh.

  • @JokoEngineeringhelp
    @JokoEngineeringhelp  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Public Dislikes: Only Like This Comment If You Dislike The Video.

  • @CHITUS
    @CHITUS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Joko I suggest making FreeCAD videos explaining the Assembly 3 Workbench. As a former Solidworks user I think this workbench is intuitive and in my opinion it should be the main Assembly workbench

    • @j121212100
      @j121212100 ปีที่แล้ว

      now i know which Assembly plugin to try. there are so many. i didn't know which one i really should be using.