One thing that himars has going for it is that it is transportable by a c130. Puls is a much larger and heavier system which has better firepower and more weapon flexibility
Very important thing is that while the himars can fire up to 6 rockets at a time of 15-45 km range (or 12 in the M270) For this range the Puls can fire 36 guided missiles (35 km) or 20 (40 km) Only 2 for 300 km and only against 4 and nothing in between Puls also have an 8 150 km option But himars have a 1 500km than Puls doesn’t
Nope himars M142 will be able to mount 2 PrSM with 500 km of range in one pod unlike with ATACAMS 300 km range which is only 1 missile in pod so do more research because you got things wrong
@@BOKIBACKAwe are talking about PrSM which has smaller warhead to fit two in the launcher unlike ATACAMS can only fit 1 in launcher due to larger warhead please google facts before you comment. This is about M142 himars which is wheeled. Tracked M270 himars can fit even more. Two for ATACAMS in launcher and 4 PrSM.
@@fuzer4047 Himars može samo 1 od 300km od 500 se razvija i moće al je još nema da ima pokazali bi! A MLRS 270 može 2x300 zato što ima 2 lansera a o 500km ćemo pričati kad bude gotova! I Srbija ima mnogo toga završenog o tome mogu reći a o nezavrpenom ne!
So you "borrow" the technique from your biggest sponsor ( as usual), improve it and then,undercut, the original makers on the international market! Great friendship! And this is not the first time...
The us dies not sponsor the development of Israeli systems they only provide money so Israel can browse through the us military catalogue and many more countries have this like Egypt and Jordania
Everything in this video doesn’t persuade me to think PULS is a better system. M270 & HIMARS will get the new PRsM rockets which is the replacement for ATACMS. Range of 310 miles. Vastly superior to PULS. If a nation doesn’t have the money to buy US MLRS then PULS is a great secondary option. M270 and HIMARS are really… I mean REALLY, expensive. But what US weapon system isn’t more expensive than other comparable systems around the world?
Got a link of a HIMARS being destroyed ? Have you noticed not 1 video shows a actual HIMARS being destroyed. Just the MOD saying it, it was also claimed more was destroyed then what the west sent at the beginning, so what makes you think they not lying about it? In almost 2 years nobody can even show 1 destroyed HIMARS
wrong Denmark was the first Nato country to buy puls from israel !!!
MBDA Deutschland is apparently offering its joint fire support missile with 500km range to be integrated with Puls.
With what? Ballistic or cruise missile?
@@javir1669 Well it's Kinda Ballistic I guess but it's just a regular guided Missile, goes up, comes down, not a cruise Missile
Puls is battled tested in the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War.
באמת?
אתה סתם אומר
@@mesiroy1234הוא לא אומר סתם. זה באמת נכון.
Good choice
Purchased by Serbia some days ago.
In the blackberry valley.
@@mihaelhorvat1426Da videćeš nešto je već stiglo a uzeli smo 20 lansera PULS i 6 Hermes 900 za sad!
@@BOKIBACKA Aha baš čemo vidjeti.
@@mihaelhorvat1426 I? Šta ćemo sad, tresu se gaće :D
One thing that himars has going for it is that it is transportable by a c130. Puls is a much larger and heavier system which has better firepower and more weapon flexibility
PULS se isto može poneti sa istim avionom isti je kao Himars
Very important thing is that while the himars can fire up to 6 rockets at a time of 15-45 km range (or 12 in the M270)
For this range the Puls can fire 36 guided missiles (35 km) or 20 (40 km)
Only 2 for 300 km and only against 4 and nothing in between
Puls also have an 8 150 km option
But himars have a 1 500km than Puls doesn’t
Nope himars M142 will be able to mount 2 PrSM with 500 km of range in one pod unlike with ATACAMS 300 km range which is only 1 missile in pod so do more research because you got things wrong
ATACMS has a Different Israeli equivalent, the LORA
@@fuzer4047Ne Himars može da ispali 1 od 300km i sad se tek razvija od 500km a i od 500km moće samo 1 raketu!
@@BOKIBACKAwe are talking about PrSM which has smaller warhead to fit two in the launcher unlike ATACAMS can only fit 1 in launcher due to larger warhead please google facts before you comment. This is about M142 himars which is wheeled. Tracked M270 himars can fit even more. Two for ATACAMS in launcher and 4 PrSM.
@@fuzer4047 Himars može samo 1 od 300km od 500 se razvija i moće al je još nema da ima pokazali bi! A MLRS 270 može 2x300 zato što ima 2 lansera a o 500km ćemo pričati kad bude gotova! I Srbija ima mnogo toga završenog o tome mogu reći a o nezavrpenom ne!
It is in different system.Puls is multiple munitions option and can be harder more in user friendly.
US ATACMS is excellent
test it against russian occupants please, to prove it is better than himars
no chance. israel wont take a chance of technology falling into Russian hands that can be sold to iran after .
It has already been tested against Russian made weapons in Armenia by Azerbaijan
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel your correct 👍
Already has
Spain choosed it too
That’s interesting. Many European countries chose it
K-239 Chunmoo
If LM dont sell gmlrs to PULS , could make customers think twice.
So you "borrow" the technique from your biggest sponsor ( as usual), improve it and then,undercut, the original makers on the international market! Great friendship! And this is not the first time...
The us dies not sponsor the development of Israeli systems they only provide money so Israel can browse through the us military catalogue and many more countries have this like Egypt and Jordania
It's a Completely different System lol
What Borrow?
Everything in this video doesn’t persuade me to think PULS is a better system. M270 & HIMARS will get the new PRsM rockets which is the replacement for ATACMS. Range of 310 miles. Vastly superior to PULS. If a nation doesn’t have the money to buy US MLRS then PULS is a great secondary option. M270 and HIMARS are really… I mean REALLY, expensive. But what US weapon system isn’t more expensive than other comparable systems around the world?
So the ability to buy 5 times more launchers and rockets is very useful
I wrote a very detailed answer but it seems that it just disappeared 😭
Puls is more modular, and most importantly its way cheaper
PRSM is just a Tactical Ballistic Missile, LORA is a similar one
It is in Sudan already
Israël army have himars
❤️🇺🇸
Puls would have been destroyed in Ukraine like Himars by Russian Army 😂😂😂. Its obvious. Ask Ukrainians 😂😂😂
Got a link of a HIMARS being destroyed ? Have you noticed not 1 video shows a actual HIMARS being destroyed. Just the MOD saying it, it was also claimed more was destroyed then what the west sent at the beginning, so what makes you think they not lying about it? In almost 2 years nobody can even show 1 destroyed HIMARS
There still are stupid that thinks that himars has been destroyed by the russian drunks army? 😂
In the dreams only.