Its 2022.. and its hi end gpu.. so 4K + Ray trace test is very clear.... So many youtube channel hide ray trace performance Amd .. Because they dont want to look bad🤭🤭🤭.
The 4080 for nvidia this generation is like amd competing against a 4070 using the 7900xtx, they skimpt us in 2022, not a huge brag but it works, also 50 series they will bring back bigger pcbs and bring prices back down , no reason to go amd unless they shoot prices 20% lower
This is a great comparison, really appreciate it. I keep hearing that NVIDIA "blows AMD out of the water" but neither of these would have been playable on RT Ultra and they were barely distinguishable on RT high. Plus, I keep noticing that I prefer the color rendering on the AMD cards, it's just more...vibrant.
I've got the AMD 7900 XTX, it's a beast of a card, which for the price was worth it for me. These two cards are identical in performance, which comparing 30 and 40 fps, neither is playable, you need at least 60fps to play any game comfortably.
@@dabuita yeah but the vram will last you in the long run, if you want the card to last you two more years from now to be al to run stuff at 4k with tray tracing youre gonan need more than 16gb of vram also rx 7900xtx is cheaper
@@JuanTorres-gn2ss True but it would take years till u need more than 16 gb of vram , and i would rather want IMMEDIATE good results , secondly RT isnt some fancy thing anymore , games like forza doom and others subtly use it in settings , and in even those ray tracings Amd sucks so hard , not to mention DLSS 3 can guarantee more future proofing than AMD.
@@asdfag557 You can see games today taking 14-15 gb of vram, just look at hogwart's legacy. As you can see most games are very close even with ray tracing. FSR is 2.1 is pretty much on the same level as DLSS 2 and the DLSS 3 is a pointless gimmick that make your game look worse and skyrockets latency. If you so insistent on frame generation FSR 3 will come very soon and there are some leaks that suggest that it could be much better than DLSS 3, but we will need to wait and see.
@@dabuita pretty sure the 7900 xtx is faster in most games with ractracing off but the 4080 is a lot better at raytracing. Both are crazy good cards and both are overprized compared to previous generations.
Yeah, I keep finding that I preferred the color rendering on the AMD cards too. And the framerates are pretty meaningless when you're off by 15 but still nearly 100 FPS, that's not really noticeable.
I'm assuming these are all in 4K? The video does not make it very clear. Your description also states 1080p
I'm really sorry bro they are benchmarked on 4K resolution
Its 2022.. and its hi end gpu.. so 4K + Ray trace test is very clear.... So many youtube channel hide ray trace performance Amd .. Because they dont want to look bad🤭🤭🤭.
RT performance is a lot closer than i thought it would be
they didnt show really intensive ones clearly car games only does rt for the cars reflection
@@Monestfiks mf they showed cyberpunk
@@brettjames5061 😂😂 that "mf" at the start makes this comment so much better
The 4080 for nvidia this generation is like amd competing against a 4070 using the 7900xtx, they skimpt us in 2022, not a huge brag but it works, also 50 series they will bring back bigger pcbs and bring prices back down , no reason to go amd unless they shoot prices 20% lower
This is a great comparison, really appreciate it. I keep hearing that NVIDIA "blows AMD out of the water" but neither of these would have been playable on RT Ultra and they were barely distinguishable on RT high. Plus, I keep noticing that I prefer the color rendering on the AMD cards, it's just more...vibrant.
Can u tell. Me the hud display settings of msi afterburner how to display charts like this in game, full chart settings or make a video
why color are different
What resolution in test?
I've got the AMD 7900 XTX, it's a beast of a card, which for the price was worth it for me. These two cards are identical in performance, which comparing 30 and 40 fps, neither is playable, you need at least 60fps to play any game comfortably.
4080 is clearly more faster video card. It's better to pay 200 more and buy 4080.
@@dabuita yeah but the vram will last you in the long run, if you want the card to last you two more years from now to be al to run stuff at 4k with tray tracing youre gonan need more than 16gb of vram also rx 7900xtx is cheaper
@@JuanTorres-gn2ss True but it would take years till u need more than 16 gb of vram , and i would rather want IMMEDIATE good results , secondly RT isnt some fancy thing anymore , games like forza doom and others subtly use it in settings , and in even those ray tracings Amd sucks so hard , not to mention DLSS 3 can guarantee more future proofing than AMD.
@@asdfag557 You can see games today taking 14-15 gb of vram, just look at hogwart's legacy. As you can see most games are very close even with ray tracing. FSR is 2.1 is pretty much on the same level as DLSS 2 and the DLSS 3 is a pointless gimmick that make your game look worse and skyrockets latency. If you so insistent on frame generation FSR 3 will come very soon and there are some leaks that suggest that it could be much better than DLSS 3, but we will need to wait and see.
@@dabuita pretty sure the 7900 xtx is faster in most games with ractracing off but the 4080 is a lot better at raytracing. Both are crazy good cards and both are overprized compared to previous generations.
the thumbnail is click magnet 😍
bruh 💀🗿
down bad
It's amazing large channels like Linus still say AMD can't do ready tracing. Either they are Nvidia schills or they simply don't do proper research
Dlss on and fsr on ?
Disabled
🥰 nice benchmark style
Thanks Bro
Amd gives better picture quality and color
LOLS, my 4080 kilked thos AMDumb
Yeah, I keep finding that I preferred the color rendering on the AMD cards too. And the framerates are pretty meaningless when you're off by 15 but still nearly 100 FPS, that's not really noticeable.
👋
Yo
Clickbait!! Video me vo ladki hae hi nai 😂
😑😑
@@ttnbenchmarks2514 😂😂😂
Rtx 4080 docet 🎉
Siuuuuuuuuuuu
1st
Thanks Bro