Please do a test of Cyberpunk with path tracing on and all settings on ultra high. Then run it again with DLSS on and FSR on. Thanks, that would be so awesome if you could do that.
With one have best price to performance? Rtx 4070ti 1000€ vs rx 6950xt 800€ vs rx 7900xtx 1100€. I am confused with one I should get over my current rtx 3070.
Nvidia successfully convinced gamers that reflection handling is more important that pure rasturization, and charges $200+ for it. Impressive marketing.
The price is bad but the card itself is much more than 'reflection handling', you get better power efficiency, DLSS 2/3, optimization for a wider variety of studio and productivity software which coincides with RT performance for both games and 3d work.
@@JagsP95 , you dumb fanboys keep beating this dlls drum , its nothing special , competition has similar features . And productivity nonsense , 90% gamers don't care , they just play games , get your head out of Jensen Huang's ass .he doesn't care about you shilling for him. Wake up fanboy.
The 7900 XT is coming down to around $750 in price. Meanwhile, Nvidia's still trying to sell the 4080 for $1200-$1300 despite the fact it wasn't all that much faster in these tests. The 4080 should be $800-$900 at max.
Being not much faster isn't all... consuming far less power, staying much cooler AND the codec support it's the reason why it's more expensive. But I agree SMH its should NOT be more than 950-1000$
No way, considering 7900 XTX price and the fact that they perform almost the same and 4080 has way better ray tracing performance, I think 1k max is fair. I do think that the 7900 XTX is also overpriced though.
The 7900XT is my go to card for 1440p. In my country the cheapest 3080 is more than 1400$ while the cheapest 7900XTX is 1200$. I can find a 730$ 7900XT and I don't think I need more performance than that for 4 to 5 more years.
I hella agree with you, I bought one Sapphire Reference. 3440x1440p Alienware AW3423 and I manage (70-100fps) in RDR2 with everything maxed im gunna rock it for awhile and MAYBE buy 8000 series when they launch for my next build.
@@test_account939 that's sweet! About the same I'm swapping my XT in for , I just gotta add another 100$ thx to a sale going on , sweet price for a 24gb card , to me that's gotta last at least another 5 to 8 years with the masses still buying 8gb cards
Just purchased my 7900 XTX for under $1,000 after tax, while a new 4080 would have been $1,100 before tax. For the same performance, the 7900 XTX was a no-brainer.
@@Aaronnpool23 my gf has a 750w power supply too, and I was thinking of getting her the 7900 XT cause the price is better now. But I might wait for a 7800 XT just in case
I just got a 7900 XTX for my secondary system. Even as someone with a 4090 in my main, I am still damn impressed with the XTX. I haven't been this impressed with an AMD card since my HD7950 like 10 or 11 years ago.
@@Aaronnpool23 Got the RTX 3060ti last year. From what the RX 7900 XT and XTX was at release, I think I'll wait for the RX 8900 XT and XTX because those must be a banger.
3000 series + any modern amd card. the extra money spent on a 4080, will be effectively reimbursed throughout the lifetime use of the card. A lot of people don't take power savings into account.
RTX 3000 use Samsung 8nm node, which where power hungry & not good OC AMD RX 6000 use 7nm TSMC node, which needed less volts & have more OC AMD RX 7000 use 5nm TSMC node, wich is less power hungry & better overall RTX 4000 use 4nm TSMC node, wich is less power hungry & better overall node.. wich is the best in market currently The only downside of Nvidia is they already charge 2x more with less VRAM ($1200 80 class card for $1200) While AMD charge 1.5x more with with 25% more VRAM but slightly less performnce ($800) RX 7900xt & 7900xtx will be extremely good GPUs in few months.. they will be cheaper by 30% or so.. RX 8900xt / 8900xtx will probably be same VRAM capacity but with 4nm node in 2024 & for same price.. time will tell
@@pastreaver5820 no it wont. amd cards is meant to be undervolted. u gain fps and u lose like 120w in power consumption. ur meant to use amd gpus with and amd cpu. where u can undervolt and activate sam for a better smoother performance. so no. it will not. amd gpus is meant to be undervolted they are super tuned to be stable just undervolt and activate sam and u have a higher rastorization power for a lower power consumption with a much higher 1% lows. just tell us u know fuck all about gpus instead of writing that the shit that is nvidia 4k series is anything but garbage thank you.
I’m liking the numbers coming from the Radeon cards, but also like the power efficiency and low temperatures coming from Nvidia. I’m really only saying this because I have a small room without ventilation. It becomes a microwave oven when playing gpu intensive games.
7900 xt is an insane deal right now, bundled with the $100 edition of starfield, and with FSR 3.0 coming in september? Yeah, people need to stop letting Nvidia control them and realize that AMD is massively on the upswing.
They would have to pay me to play Starfield woke BS, but even if it wouldnt be woke its still a bad, bland game. They can take their pronouns and stick them where the sun never shines.
Try pushing the PL slider all the way up, set the memory to 2714Mhz with fast timings, leave the max core at stock, but increase the minimum to 2400mhz, and if it's stable, undervolt by 50mv. This saw a 15-20fps increase in most cases, matching or even surpassing the 4080. These are my settings, and it's an absolute monster.
considering amd's cards are on 5nm vs nvidia 4nm, and they are chiplets, the potential power and cost effectiveness of next generation should be superb.
Please do a test of Cyberpunk with path tracing on and all settings on ultra high. Then run it again with DLSS on and FSR on. Using the same test methods but DLSS 3.5 versus FSR 3.0 when it comes out. Using the same video cards and settings as what is in this video. Peace.
The 4080 stomps the other two competitors from this video with DLSS3 and FG on... With the settings you mentioned RTX 4080 can actually reach 60fps...These two? Maybe 5...or 8 fps...
One advantage of the 4080, not price wise but is power. It gets similar performance for significantly less wattage. Still prefer AMD in this one though.
its 40watts difference, with a .32cent per kwh and running 6 hours a day for a year, the dollar difference is only 30 bucks a year, and thats not even including undervolting which amd cards are kinda known for. for 500 bucks difference, you have to keep your 4080 16 years to make up the price difference.
@@lemarcoX btw I agree that the 7900 XTX is a much better value in this comparison and you'd need to use them for years to make the difference in value with energy savings, that said in my country they're both the same price so the power consumption becomes more of a factor.
7900 XTX looks to be the best investment. But it sucks when using VR which market is growing....... Please do test VR now... we can see so many same testing.....
hell no, here have some real benchmark, watch this and tell me how these amd cards are in the same league as a 4080 th-cam.com/video/wrcD9uo_On0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=sYhaH-2lTKtlzH4Z&t=1245
The 7900xtx should have been the 7900XT and priced at 800. The 7900XT should have been 7800XT and have been 600. The 7800XT should have called 7700XT and should have been 450. The 7700XT should be the 7600XT and should have been 350. The 7600 was the only one correctly named and should have been 250. Don't even get me started on Nvidia.
@@someguywithmtndew5691 Red got both last gen. It was cheaper and more efficient. Funny how people didn't give a fuck about efficiency last time, but since they are retarded fanboys, this time is a plus.
RX 7900XTX is the go-to option The power savings of the 4080 are so minimal (especially here in the states where power is 11-17 cents per kw/h) even if you live in germany or something it's only 50 bucks more over 4 years and realistically the types of people who buy these cards upgrade every 1-5 years anyways
Or even better, just get the 7900 xt. It's hovering around $750 and some go on sale for $700 and you get 80-90% of the 4080 performance while saving $500.
LOVE my 7900xtx powercolor hellhound and I recommend it. 200 cheaper than nvidia overpriced junk. I left nvidia after they did the 4080 12gb which was a 4070ti for 800 bucks, what a joke. GOODBYE NVIDIA, RIP EVGA.
@@NamTran-xc2ip In germany with some of the highest prices for electricity, it makes only 50 cent different in a month if you choose between 4080 or 7900xt
@@MrBugfunk Looking up Google, it's about 40c/1kwh. This is a 50W difference. Let's say you game 10 hours/week. Which makes it 80c/month more. I guess you are right, even if you use it for 4 years it will be less than a $50 difference.
How did you manage to get the exact same footage in these games using both cards? Especially in MW2 multi-player. I'm just curious how the editing was done (I have an idea how and it makes sense), but I'm curious if my suspicion is correct.
I own a RX 7900 XTX coming from a GTX 1080 such a big difference, I bought it on March 2023 and tbh I was really upset because of drivers problems I even tried to return it but newegg don't refund open products so I had to keep it, about 4-5 months ago the problems I had were no more, amd really worked hard on fixing it and right now the card is very stable, they work on the amd video encoder too, record, stream and render in sony vegas is a piece of cake, now I'm really happy with my purchase and considering how inflated the prices are on nvidia side going amd this time is really good money expended.
Well today i made my minde and i chose RX 7900 XT over 4070ti. Not only RX 7900 XT is cheaper then 4070ti, but also have better performance. And most important thing is that i wont have to worrie about if 12gb vram is enough in next couple of years.
@@tmsphere haha i actualy bought new pc with rtx 4070 :D And my goal is to change this pc in 2 years or so when rtx 6*** and new amd cards get released why? becouse i feel like gpu now days dont give u what they should for the money u spend. And so far im happy with this decision. Cyberpunk on ultra setting with ray tracing on medium with some options turn off and still haveing +/- 80fps in 1440p For 2 years thats enough.
Upgrading from an Nvidea 1070 to either the XT or XTX. 1440p 144hz screen (may upgrade the framerate to 180+) so it'll be a pretty huge leap. From all the research I've done, the XT seems to be the best value 1440p card on the market, but the XTX is incredibly tempting, though it is obviously geared more towards 4k and would be overkill for 1440p. I have the money to spare but I hate the idea of purchasing a better graphics card at worse value for money.
@@sawz_z Went XTX. Only an extra £100 and stronger in every department. More future-proof too. The more and more i've been researching the XTX after already buying it, the more confident i get that i made the right decision. That being said, i also ended up buying a new PC all together, so bottlenecking isn't an issue for me, whereas it may be for you. Still, bottlenecking isn't the end of the world and it'll probably still worth it even with a bottleneck.
@@sparky844 Thank you. Where I am the XTX costs 200€ more than the XT. Planning to game on a 144/165hz 1440p monitor and a 4k 60hz Oled TV, I am going to build a all new system. Mine is 10 years old and going with a 7900 XTX will be a 2000% power increase 😅. It seems to be overkill for me at 4k 60 fps. But I also think future proof as I keep my PC for a very long time before changing the entire new system. Looking at benchmarks now doesn't give you the numbers for how it will perform in 5 years. So going overkill is maybe the solution. Which CPU/RAM did you choose?
@@sawz_z i chose Intel i9-13900KF. Also chose 2x16Gb (32Gb) ram, although 2x8Gb (16Gb) would gave worked just as well. You could probably push the framerate a bit higher than 165fps and maybe go for a 180to240hz monitor? The card can handle it for some games. I saw that on a 4k monitor on ultra settings, R6 could run at about 240fps on the XTX.
Really depends on your monitor, no point in paying an extra 100$ minimum for 1440p but 4k its a must. I had to upgrade my monitor from 1080p 60Hz to a good quality 1440p with real HDR10 and 170Hz totally worth it. For 4k screen with those capabilities it costs 40% more.
If I can get the 7900 XTX and the 4080 at the same price on marketplace which would you go with? It’s a 7900 xtx radeon reference card abs a tuf gaming 4080
I think for people who buy from amazon and from outside the US the 7900 xt is by far the best option. After taxes the difference with the 7900 xtx is very large and the extra performance is not justified for that difference of more than 220 USD or more depending on the country...
AMD has better p/f as always. I'd rather run a game at native resolution than with dlss which introduces visual glitches. And RT at 4k is stupid for the performance loss. Plus, I won't support a company that has terrible customer practices.
The 4080 performing that well while drawing less power is impressive I will wait however for the 5000 BlackWell series to see if AI has improved the cards
@fnonpm , lol, you nvidia fanboys are something else , so all of sudden power power matters , rtx3080 was using 320 watts and rx6800xt 280watts , similar performance , but you fanboys didn't say amd better using less power, lol Rtx4080 is $400.00 more than rx7900xt , performance only 10% difference , I can get a 7700x CPU and 1 tb ssd for $400.00 . Dumb fanboy.
@@club4ghz u use dlss which is not good. I never use dlss or fsr... It ruins the game. And cyberpunk is an Nvidia title... Of course it will have more fps. When I attack Nvidia all people have to tell me about cyberpunk.... Well I never played that game and neither my cousins and friends. If u wanna game with dlss then go ahead but if u put both cards native 4k at ultra settings without dlss and without ray tracing then the raster is better with AMD card
10-15% more wattage but getting a car £300 cheaper plus i have solar panels anyways so even if it would make much difference in electricity wouldn’t matter to me
best part to this whole thing is the 7900 XTX will drop by 200+ dollars by the time the 8900 XTX or 8950 XTX comes out and by then the 4080 will still be $1200+ till stock runs out f*cking funny to me. but it's all irrelevant to me since going with w/e the next highest AMD GPU is anyway next year but I liked the video all the same :)
Nvidia keep walking in Apple footsteps.. They barely discount their GPUs.. which is BS move AMD is like Android phones.. they fles more on discounts.. which is nice
I wanna see these graphics cards put to the test with a bunch of things happening on the screen like when playing bf2042 the rush XL with 128 players on a small map pushes my rx6700xt to the max almost if not using all my vram maxed out.
I have an rtx 6800xt and i am very happy with the efficiency. I undervolted it and i even underclocked it and now it peaks at 180w, is very quiet and i have 60fps 4k on high to ultra settings on almost all games. (Demanding games like red dead redemption) Im not going to buy a graphicscard that uses 300watt because it gets so hot in my room so quickly. The heat production especially during summer is mad
@The Batman My 3600 and 2060 are still capable in modern titles albeit its starting to become obsolete (60 FPS 1080p Medium and around 70 at 1080p low). I know a 7900xtx will become obsolete for 4k gaming in 1 or 2 years. Right now the 7900xtx and 7900xt are better at 1440p than the 2080ti was at 1080p at launch. The 2080ti is still perfectly fine at 1080p and so is the 1080ti. 1% lows and .1% lows are only a problem if game optimization is bad (Fortnite, Lord of the Rings Gollum) or you are running out of VRAM, RAM or you CPU/GPU cannot handle the loads. The 4080 is a terrible card in general. Its cost 200 more than the 7900xtx, and only has 16gb VRAM. Cost per frame is awful. Frame gen is not for me based on the games I play, and FSR 2 is fine for me. Adding what you are saying the what I already know, the 7900xtx would be the best bet. 4090 is priced way to high at almost 1000 CAD more than the 7900xtx.
240hz is not good for these GPUs with the loud coil whine problem. You should better wait for the fixed custom versions if you really want to play 240fps. Only 160 fps lock is a solid solution. I can really recommend the 6950xt, it had mostly the same Performance like the 7900xt with way less coil whine and the prize for the Performance is way better. If you play simple high fps shooters like overwatch, cs go, CoD, Apex it will runs on all games easy with 240 fps native 1440p and faster gpus like the 7900xtx Performance nearly the same, because the cpu bottleneck begins already at this fps area. If you play a game with a high perfomance impact, you have mostly the fsr2 upscaling solution if you really want it should run over the 200fps. I upgraded my 6900xt to the 7900xtx paired with a 13700kf and the Performance increase is only in intensive singeplayer games. RT Performance is a way Higher but not for high fps gaming absolutly nonsense for the minimal image quality Upgrade. I can really say, the new generation is overprized as hell.
In oz the difference between 4080 and xtx is $150 - $200. 1550 vs 1750 . At that price 4080 def look better. At $200 US I can see ot may not be worth it.
@huynguyen-qv8zj Australia, sometime we use it as a short variant of Aus. Loosly refers to the land of Oz in wizard of Oz. We like to refer to ourselves like this, as we are on the other side of the world, distant...
In all scenarios.. 7900xtx 24GB with 380-bit bus is 50% more Bandwith power (4080 is 256-bit only) 4080 will not age well.. 16GB is a botteleneck for $1200 card (or $1750 in Aus as U said) Don'r be fooled by RT & DLSS.. they only just extra.. U should focus more in pure power U remember those 3080 back in 2020-2021 with it's 10GB ? where are they now? they barely can handle new heavy games which already using 12GB-14GB.. so the 16GB won't age well, unlike 24GB
@@Jack_Sparrow131 I feel even more sad for the people that went for the 3070 which is kinda outdated now already with its 8gb vram and costed like 1k euro at the time xD In Europe the price difference between a 4080 and 7900xtx is like 200-300 euro
I've never used an amd card but they look promising but i've been hearing that they have a lot of issues with drivers and support in general that ppl who bought them are switching back to nvidia
Is it me or does the tones in the 7900xtx in some games just look more real. Like true to life reflections of how and what we actually see with our regular eyes. This is coming from a 4080 owner. Amazing. Great vid!
I think it's important to know that your monitor probably performs a little bit better in the middle in regards to color and light - and also the angle you view the screen at has something to say. And I just bought a 7900XTX!
@@lethanhtung4972Wow im so glad you said this as I use Photoshop and I was going to get the 7900XTX but as you said "you cant do a lot of work with amd card" thnx for the advice, I will use Nvidia instead.
@@Nite-Lite-Gamers He's right for studio and 3d workflow, nvidia cards are the only choice since they have drivers and cuda support for a wide range of software. AMD is sorely lacking when it comes to productivity.
I'm tired of this Idk why all the people complain about his graphic card, it's just unbelievable since we all know that the human eyes can only see 4gb of vram.
so what am i missing here ? for some reason with same settings the memory used on the 4080 is way higher than on the amd cards. are these all nvidea supported/sponsored games?
I think for people who buy from amazon and from outside the US the 7900 xt is by far the best option. After taxes the difference with the 7900 xtx is very large and the extra performance is not justified for that difference of more than 220 USD or more depending on the country...
@@tmspherebest price i found was its 180-250 more for only 12-15 fps more, itd be more wise to invest in a better cpu or better case/cooling system. i hit 2100$ with my xt build but everything is s tier in the build. with the xtx it wouldve been 2350$ after tax :/ its 4gb vram more but only 15 fps more so idk if its worth the 2-300 more for 15fps
@@fuckyoutubrforchangingthisit is not you did a great choice, in my county at least it’s 200$ for the cheapest XTX, if you want a good cooling like nitro its 300$ more this is almost a 4080, not worth it
I know my 7900xtx came in at £898 prob base but more than capable. Depends if you want to fork put for the tuned xtx at £1000. Didn't really see much difference so saved some cash. But if you had 3 rigs running with no fps counter and no way of telling what's inside you wouldn't tell the difference playing unless you had super human eye sight. Enjoy what ever you have at the end of the day.
@@alitekken i am talking about without any upscaling tech. And fram gen is not real frames, using dlss3 when u r already getting less then 60 is not beneficial. The real use of dlss3 in when u already getting high real frames. But then do u really need frame gen
I bought 7900xt and have had nothing but problems. Constant crashes and driver issues. Returned it and purchased a 4080 and have no complaints. Buy quality or buy twice
@@wpheavyww they won't compare the xtx to the 4090 even though they both are the flagship because the 4090 literally shits all over every amd ever made
the 4080 is 400 euros more than the 7900xt..... the 7900xt is clearly the winner. i dont use ray tracing and i dont like to use dlss and fsr. 7900xt is the beast here
Buying a 1k+ dollar gpu to play basic rasta settings only lol. So braindead. If you want a basic looking game get a mid range card. Also not much of a beast seeming it's down 30% from msrp only months after it got released with dog power consumption but you are a basic fps simpleton who doesn't understand it's more than just 1 number that makes a good card.
@@gerald8573 yeah because Nvidia is stupid. Dlss can give u more fps... But it lowers ur resolution..... I don't like to lower my resolution U either play native or you don't. My friend got the 2080 super 4 years ago for 800 euros... And I will pay 850euros to get the 7900xt. Nvidia is not a good company. They don't care about consumer's like us. That's why my build is full AMD
@@meltinsr ray tracing is good but even the 4090 cannot play at 4k ultra with RT on maybe on 50 fps but that's trash... I need 80+ fps to game. Maybe next year the new GPUs will be able to game at 4k with RT on
@@Ayan-dk7xq , so just because its priced at $1200.00 you have to buy it , its dumb to spend as much money cause you gave it a tag "flagship" , lol OK then anything past rtx4070ti or rx,7900xt is dumb , 20% more fps for 50% more price , You can get CPU and ssd for $400.00 , and rtx4090 is even more dumb $1600.00 ?? Flagship my azz , in a year its just another mid range GPU.
Would the 7900xt be a decent upgrade from the 3080? Or just save and get a 7900xtx? I mainly play fps games like battlefield and apex at 4k and I use medium settings most of the time.
I think Amd 7900 XT is the go to one ,also 7900xtx is costlier considering there is hardly any difference which one can see in normal eye why would one buy Nvidia RTX 4080 apart from the brand value it is prized at almost $1400 + and in India $1600 . which is a huge amount .
@@AniketSingh-hr8mi AMD doesn't provide you after sales service but the board partners unless it's a founders edition. You should be concerned about after sales services from Sapphire, XFX, Asus, Galax, Zotac, Gigabyte, MSI, etc who actually turns GPU into a graphics 'card'. I would personally go with Sapphire if I would want to buy a AMD graphics card.
I can't decide between RTX4080 and RX 7900 XTX. I want to play 21:9 1440p I only play games, and watch a lot of YT, anime and sites on PC. Also my PC idles A LOT during the day.
Raytracing is kinda useless anyway, modern cards still not good enough to carry full rtx etc. games, I tried fortnite max settings on 2k monitor, it barely hits 90fps, with dlss it's a bit more than 110, but I am not a fan of dlss, it looks washed sometimes
Dlss 3.0, RTX??? Sure the 4080 is on par in terms of rasterization, but does these types of benchmarks are not realistic, as in, I'm gaming with RTX ultra with at least 25% bump in fps, all the while consuming less power...
yeah sure.. pay extra $300 to get RT which will kill 50% of fps in all scenarios.. and call it efficiency efficiency is disabling RT until 2025 with better hardware to be able to use RT without a serious 50% loss in fps Also, most games RT is barely change anything, or it's half broken, majority of people who have 4000 series cards already turning of RT to get more fps as far as I seen reddit & steam threads
@@Jack_Sparrow131i have a 4080 and i can run every game with RT Max Settings 100 fps more or less In the newest games DLSS looks even better than native resolution + you have frame Generation that gives you a 109% performance boos while keeping the picture quality. it depends on the resolution you play in but the majority still uses 1080p the second is 1440p and 4k is not much used. So the 40 series cards are only worth when you have the 4080-4070 so you talk nonsense RT is only worth it if you have the right card ofc you cant expect a good experience with 8-10 GB with Raytracing on
in my country 4080 and 7900xtx are priced exactly the same, can even get some models of 4080 for cheaper then the options available for AMD. both cost around 1300 USD.
Before concluding that 4080 is worse than these two, you must compare the power consumption of these gpus and u will find out that 4080 consumes relatively less power
I mean who really cares about power draw, unless your mining on the cards, but for your average gaming pc getting 20ish hours a week, it’s gonna cost you what an extra 20 bucks a year?
@@smedleyheadleygames29 what's more interesting is that 4080 outperforms these two gpus in some games like forza with relatively less power consumption and vram
![[ ออกกอง ] วัยหนุ่ม 2544 โลกหลังลูกกรง..ทัวร์กองถ่ายหนังใน "คุกของจริง" | JUSTดูIT.](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vB--aOkZCpw/mqdefault.jpg)
Games :
Hitman 3 - 0:20 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesHitman3
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:26 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 2:30 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Forza Horizon 5 - 3:32 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
Hogwarts Legacy - 4:42 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
The Last of Us Part I - 5:55
A Plague Tale: Requiem - 6:54
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 7:59 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesMFS20
System:
Windows 11
Core i9-13900K - bit.ly/3SgY3xf
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL38
CPU Cooler - Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 - bit.ly/3Pn2xVx
GeForce RTX 4080 16Gb - bit.ly/3THhnV5
RADEON RX 7900 XT 20GB - bit.ly/3W06ek8
RADEON RX 7900 XTX 24GB - bit.ly/3Hx6keI
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR HX Series HX1200 1200W - bit.ly/3EZWtNj
why not 7800X3D 🙂
@@inhnguyenminh4522
And with resizabel BAR/SAM. ;)
Please do a test of Cyberpunk with path tracing on and all settings on ultra high. Then run it again with DLSS on and FSR on. Thanks, that would be so awesome if you could do that.
why no information on resolution
With one have best price to performance?
Rtx 4070ti 1000€ vs rx 6950xt 800€ vs rx 7900xtx 1100€.
I am confused with one I should get over my current rtx 3070.
Nvidia successfully convinced gamers that reflection handling is more important that pure rasturization, and charges $200+ for it. Impressive marketing.
Nvidia is better but the 7900 XTX should cost the same as the 4080 because it is faster in raster. Same for the 4070 Ti and the 7900 XT.
The price is bad but the card itself is much more than 'reflection handling', you get better power efficiency, DLSS 2/3, optimization for a wider variety of studio and productivity software which coincides with RT performance for both games and 3d work.
@@JagsP95 , you dumb fanboys keep beating this dlls drum , its nothing special , competition has similar features .
And productivity nonsense , 90% gamers don't care , they just play games , get your head out of Jensen Huang's ass .he doesn't care about you shilling for him. Wake up fanboy.
@@samgragas8467 Or maybe the 4080 should cost the same as the 7900 xtx
Both of them should cost at max 600 bucks 😂
The 7900 XT is coming down to around $750 in price. Meanwhile, Nvidia's still trying to sell the 4080 for $1200-$1300 despite the fact it wasn't all that much faster in these tests. The 4080 should be $800-$900 at max.
The XTX can be found for 829 now too. It is being pretty aggressive with pricing
now its 700$.
Being not much faster isn't all... consuming far less power, staying much cooler AND the codec support it's the reason why it's more expensive. But I agree SMH its should NOT be more than 950-1000$
No way, considering 7900 XTX price and the fact that they perform almost the same and 4080 has way better ray tracing performance, I think 1k max is fair. I do think that the 7900 XTX is also overpriced though.
@@upfront2375and ray tracing
The 7900XT is my go to card for 1440p. In my country the cheapest 3080 is more than 1400$ while the cheapest 7900XTX is 1200$. I can find a 730$ 7900XT and I don't think I need more performance than that for 4 to 5 more years.
@asdfpoop33921 yeah. it's a typo. But a 3080 is already more pricy than 7900XT. Somehow here in Vietnam, 7900XT is lower than MSRP.
I went 7900xt as another 200$ for 8 to 20fps more on the xtx not worth it
I hella agree with you, I bought one Sapphire Reference. 3440x1440p Alienware AW3423 and I manage (70-100fps) in RDR2 with everything maxed im gunna rock it for awhile and MAYBE buy 8000 series when they launch for my next build.
dang the 7900 xtx is 830 usd where i am rn
@@test_account939 that's sweet! About the same I'm swapping my XT in for , I just gotta add another 100$ thx to a sale going on , sweet price for a 24gb card , to me that's gotta last at least another 5 to 8 years with the masses still buying 8gb cards
Just purchased my 7900 XTX for under $1,000 after tax, while a new 4080 would have been $1,100 before tax. For the same performance, the 7900 XTX was a no-brainer.
if its only for gaming then it makes sense
RT = RTX 4080 )
@@Bl0ck1447 I would rather have more FPS than to use RT, its still too slow and therefore still just a gimmick to me at this point.
Been having my 7900 XTX since around March (upgraded from a RTX 3070) and it’s been awesome!
Jealous I got the 3060ti and a 750W dual pin power supply. The XT version is what I’m going to buy next I think
@@Aaronnpool23 my gf has a 750w power supply too, and I was thinking of getting her the 7900 XT cause the price is better now. But I might wait for a 7800 XT just in case
I just got a 7900 XTX for my secondary system. Even as someone with a 4090 in my main, I am still damn impressed with the XTX. I haven't been this impressed with an AMD card since my HD7950 like 10 or 11 years ago.
@@Aaronnpool23 Got the RTX 3060ti last year. From what the RX 7900 XT and XTX was at release, I think I'll wait for the RX 8900 XT and XTX because those must be a banger.
@@buttergolem8584 yeah true I’m thinking of maybe the 7800xt on boxing week might be able to snag it for 500-600 Canadian and sell the 3060ti
I want to see RX 7900 XT paired with Ryzen 7 7800X3D on 10 Games test
This is the exact setup I'm going for, I wanna see what it can do!
Especially at 1080p, my monitor resolution :3
😅 its overkill
One thing I have to give credit to 4000 series is lower power draw compared to 3000 series
3000 series + any modern amd card. the extra money spent on a 4080, will be effectively reimbursed throughout the lifetime use of the card. A lot of people don't take power savings into account.
RTX 3000 use Samsung 8nm node, which where power hungry & not good OC
AMD RX 6000 use 7nm TSMC node, which needed less volts & have more OC
AMD RX 7000 use 5nm TSMC node, wich is less power hungry & better overall
RTX 4000 use 4nm TSMC node, wich is less power hungry & better overall node.. wich is the best in market currently
The only downside of Nvidia is they already charge 2x more with less VRAM ($1200 80 class card for $1200)
While AMD charge 1.5x more with with 25% more VRAM but slightly less performnce ($800)
RX 7900xt & 7900xtx will be extremely good GPUs in few months.. they will be cheaper by 30% or so..
RX 8900xt / 8900xtx will probably be same VRAM capacity but with 4nm node in 2024 & for same price.. time will tell
simple thinking for a card tier that came out 3 years ago...
@@pastreaver5820 no it wont. amd cards is meant to be undervolted. u gain fps and u lose like 120w in power consumption. ur meant to use amd gpus with and amd cpu.
where u can undervolt and activate sam for a better smoother performance.
so no. it will not. amd gpus is meant to be undervolted they are super tuned to be stable just undervolt and activate sam and u have a higher rastorization power for a lower power consumption with a much higher 1% lows.
just tell us u know fuck all about gpus instead of writing that the shit that is nvidia 4k series is anything but garbage thank you.
@@pastreaver5820 But I guess you won't be able to use a 4080 long enough to make money savings, since it's Vram will be too low in even newer games
I’m liking the numbers coming from the Radeon cards, but also like the power efficiency and low temperatures coming from Nvidia. I’m really only saying this because I have a small room without ventilation. It becomes a microwave oven when playing gpu intensive games.
Do you have a video to show this?
yah that makes sense when the card is getting 20 more fps on average on literally all games, just limit the fps
😂😂😂 can u grill chicken while playing? ❤
@@liamloxley1222 That’s one of the upsides 😂
@@Nachfrageweibchen Maybe 😂
7900 xt is an insane deal right now, bundled with the $100 edition of starfield, and with FSR 3.0 coming in september? Yeah, people need to stop letting Nvidia control them and realize that AMD is massively on the upswing.
Нвидии похер на геймеров. Они на ИИ делают кучу бабок
They would have to pay me to play Starfield woke BS, but even if it wouldnt be woke its still a bad, bland game. They can take their pronouns and stick them where the sun never shines.
"How many X you want?"
RX 7900 XTX: Yes
We want more Vram
Nvidia: Yes and no
@@MrTorch-p4z Trade offer
NVIDIA: I get $100
You: get 4GB more VRAM
Try pushing the PL slider all the way up, set the memory to 2714Mhz with fast timings, leave the max core at stock, but increase the minimum to 2400mhz, and if it's stable, undervolt by 50mv. This saw a 15-20fps increase in most cases, matching or even surpassing the 4080. These are my settings, and it's an absolute monster.
The XT or the XTX?
@@hagueian the XT.
Could this work with the 7800XT?
@@EyeLxveJayyou'd have to test it out
You can do such thing also with 4080
Just bought my 7900 XTX for $850 on sale 😊
ya but the amd cards suck at ray tracing.
@@adamfirooz6103 ray tracing 100 fps loss its shit anyway
@@adamfirooz6103ray tracing! Who cares about ray tracing lol..
@@adamfirooz6103I don’t care about ray tracing while it’s giving already more fps which is enough for me and not all game support ray tracing
Ray tracing is overhyped garbage
considering amd's cards are on 5nm vs nvidia 4nm, and they are chiplets, the potential power and cost effectiveness of next generation should be superb.
Hopefully AMD or Intel can surpass Nvidia in AI and performance for the next generation of Graphics
Please do rx 6950 xt vs rx 7900 xt vs rx 7900 xtx!!!
Please do a test of Cyberpunk with path tracing on and all settings on ultra high. Then run it again with DLSS on and FSR on. Using the same test methods but DLSS 3.5 versus FSR 3.0 when it comes out. Using the same video cards and settings as what is in this video. Peace.
these cards will have less then 40 fps so no not something u should do. the 4090 cant even get 50fps.
Here is a proper video.
th-cam.com/video/hQ1iWKoHi0U/w-d-xo.html
Daniel Owen did exactly what your looking for yesterday
The 4080 stomps the other two competitors from this video with DLSS3 and FG on... With the settings you mentioned RTX 4080 can actually reach 60fps...These two? Maybe 5...or 8 fps...
@@deimosok2003 sure thing Ricky retardo.
Would wish to see the latest ryzen amd cpus used instead of the intel models.
You are a man of culture sir and I respect that
One advantage of the 4080, not price wise but is power. It gets similar performance for significantly less wattage. Still prefer AMD in this one though.
Yeah I personally don't think that makes any difference when the price of the 4080 is a few hundred dollars more than the 7900 xtx
in some games the difference is too low ONLY 17% MORE power is consumed by 7900xtx in plague of requiem and hitman.
its 40watts difference, with a .32cent per kwh and running 6 hours a day for a year, the dollar difference is only 30 bucks a year, and thats not even including undervolting which amd cards are kinda known for. for 500 bucks difference, you have to keep your 4080 16 years to make up the price difference.
@@lemarcoXdepends on the game. In TLOU it was almost 100w difference.
@@lemarcoX btw I agree that the 7900 XTX is a much better value in this comparison and you'd need to use them for years to make the difference in value with energy savings, that said in my country they're both the same price so the power consumption becomes more of a factor.
Seems like a solid experience at 4K on all of them
for the pricing of these cards, they should to 100 fps on 4k minimum, but some games arent optimized so we cant blame amd. stupid game developpers
@@deathrager2404 I agree, I wouldn't expect less considering their price.
@@deathrager2404can’t wait for chat gpt to replace them
It's crazy how much more power efficient and cooler the 4080 is... but it should NEVR be over 1000$!!!
th-cam.com/video/wrcD9uo_On0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=sYhaH-2lTKtlzH4Z&t=1245
In my country 4080 cost $2000 😢
@@rayraydente1712 DAMN!!! Where I live used 3090s are around 500$. It's just stupid to pay even a 1000 for 4080 imo... 12Gb of vram?! SMH
$1000 would be a steal lol. It's 1200-1600 Euros here. 4090 is about 2550 Euros. That's almost as much as my last whole PC lol.
@@Bertuzz84 i bought My msi 4080 for 1100 USD on Amazon, i did search a Lot tho is such a great card man
7900 XTX looks to be the best investment. But it sucks when using VR which market is growing....... Please do test VR now... we can see so many same testing.....
That's not true turns out that it is an issue with the quest you can google videos about it no issue once you run the fix
the xt is value though ,investing wise 4090 is best lol but value that xt in most places is killing it
already AMD is doing some updates for VR games.. they said they will fix it this month
hell no, here have some real benchmark, watch this and tell me how these amd cards are in the same league as a 4080 th-cam.com/video/wrcD9uo_On0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=sYhaH-2lTKtlzH4Z&t=1245
The 7900xtx should have been the 7900XT and priced at 800. The 7900XT should have been 7800XT and have been 600. The 7800XT should have called 7700XT and should have been 450. The 7700XT should be the 7600XT and should have been 350. The 7600 was the only one correctly named and should have been 250. Don't even get me started on Nvidia.
Kindly test the 23.7.1 drivers. Apparently this gives a huge boost in both fh5 and last of us. Compare the performance with 4070 ti plz
170fps on the xt 7900
With more single player RT titles coming out, Nvidia might have market edge at the moment. Wish AMD were on par in that criteria…
7900xtx beats 4080 in rt
@@bhaveshsonar7558 No it doesnt
I'd rather have more fps thanks.
No one needs RT like you make it look...no one.
@@andrewosei328With $1000 budget everyone wants rtx, if you don't u domb
RED Got the Price
Green Got the efficiency
Totally good Comparison This Year
red got efficency aswell. just undervolt and increase ur fps. but ppl like u have no clue do u?
last year it was the opposite lol
@@someguywithmtndew5691 Red got both last gen. It was cheaper and more efficient. Funny how people didn't give a fuck about efficiency last time, but since they are retarded fanboys, this time is a plus.
UK Prices at the time where :
£789 - Sapphire Nitro 7900XT
£969 - Sapphire Nitro 7900XTX
£1280 - MSI RTX 4080
can grab one for 610.99 from box
RX 7900XTX is the go-to option
The power savings of the 4080 are so minimal (especially here in the states where power is 11-17 cents per kw/h) even if you live in germany or something it's only 50 bucks more over 4 years
and realistically the types of people who buy these cards upgrade every 1-5 years anyways
Or even better, just get the 7900 xt. It's hovering around $750 and some go on sale for $700 and you get 80-90% of the 4080 performance while saving $500.
LOVE my 7900xtx powercolor hellhound and I recommend it. 200 cheaper than nvidia overpriced junk. I left nvidia after they did the 4080 12gb which was a 4070ti for 800 bucks, what a joke. GOODBYE NVIDIA, RIP EVGA.
@@cl_0ud470 Great value no doubt but I gotta have 60+ fps in 4K.
@@cl_0ud470 Overclock a 7900 XT and you are basically getting stock 4080 performance and very close to a stock 7900 XTX.
In Germany we pay 40 cents for 1 kw/h 😢 at the moment.
The 7900 XTX could be a good option but I have doubts about that power demand.
Why does power consumption matter?
@@Z-Lanee cuz it cost more money?
@@NamTran-xc2ippower bill too 😂
@@NamTran-xc2ip In germany with some of the highest prices for electricity, it makes only 50 cent different in a month if you choose between 4080 or 7900xt
@@MrBugfunk Looking up Google, it's about 40c/1kwh. This is a 50W difference. Let's say you game 10 hours/week. Which makes it 80c/month more.
I guess you are right, even if you use it for 4 years it will be less than a $50 difference.
In all honesty best GPU on market shoudnt be more then 650$ , remember old days gtx 8800 ultra was around 500$
The old good day
How did you manage to get the exact same footage in these games using both cards? Especially in MW2 multi-player. I'm just curious how the editing was done (I have an idea how and it makes sense), but I'm curious if my suspicion is correct.
Where the hell did you see mw2 footage
@@R0lanZ0 LOL i just about to ask him, saw your comment first
I’m looking to do gaming at 1440p 240hz and amateur video editing in DaVinci Resolve. Which card should I go for between the 7900xtx and 4080?
Nvidia is betters edition video and games, amd is better only games...
Nvidia is slightly better in that regard, but you really can’t go wrong either way. And the xtx is 2-300 cheaper 🤷♂️
if its xtx vs 4080 and 240hz 1440 dota gaming its 14700 + 4080, im sure itll support core ultra but nothing confirmed
dreamocel stream i saw he got like 170-210 fps with 13700k, prob 200-240 wo recording, 14700 should up fps to constant 240hz at any game
Gonna wait for the 8900XTX and then build at the end of 2024 my new PC.
Is it a good buy right now a Nitro+ 7900 XTX for $1100? My GTX 1070 is showing it's years already playing on 3440x1440.
its a great card. i have the exact one.
how in the literal universe gtx 1070 can even render smth on 1440p
I own a RX 7900 XTX coming from a GTX 1080 such a big difference, I bought it on March 2023 and tbh I was really upset because of drivers problems I even tried to return it but newegg don't refund open products so I had to keep it, about 4-5 months ago the problems I had were no more, amd really worked hard on fixing it and right now the card is very stable, they work on the amd video encoder too, record, stream and render in sony vegas is a piece of cake, now I'm really happy with my purchase and considering how inflated the prices are on nvidia side going amd this time is really good money expended.
was it the same system that had the gtx 1080?
@@Kinatera. I had to build a new pc, since I upgrade my old cpu r7 2700x to a r9 7900x3D, new motherboard and ram was necessary.
@@Tequigamer did you use the same drive without reinstalling windows?
@@Kinatera. no, I build a new pc, everything new including windows.
@@Tequigamer thats weird
did you install the drivers using DDU?
If my 7900 XTX didn't crash in Unreal 5 and random other games due to nanite and DX12... it would be great.
stop a little at the resolution, otherwise you have to set a low speed in order to see at what resolution the test is being carried out
yeah he's way to quick
Check description
@@ij6708 Theres other setting he skips over.
Nvidia: we did a great job with the price 2,000 dollars is cheap
AMD: omg that’s to expensive lower it Down by 300 bucks
Bro in my region 7900 xt costs something around 1300$ 💀. Excellent video as always
Lol its 890 here 😂 got my nitro+ vapor xtx for 1300
Brasil?
@@wesleygfsilva1sim
The 4080 super really gonna slap the 7900xtx at the same price 😬
not going to be the same price considering the 4080 is more than the xtx and the 4080 super wont even be 5% faster then the 4080 you hopes are to high
@@pointbrake3183 are you stupid? The 4080 super is cheaper than the 7900xtx and 20% better
@@pointbrake3183the launch price of the 4080 super is $999 and it will be over 10% better than the 7900xtx
@@n64slayer 4080 super is no cheaper than the 7900xtx or 4080. 7900xtx is better that 4080
Well today i made my minde and i chose RX 7900 XT over 4070ti. Not only RX 7900 XT is cheaper then 4070ti, but also have better performance. And most important thing is that i wont have to worrie about if 12gb vram is enough in next couple of years.
did same thing
Its even better at RT than 4070ti, and 8 more gigs of vram.
@@tmsphere haha i actualy bought new pc with rtx 4070 :D And my goal is to change this pc in 2 years or so when rtx 6*** and new amd cards get released why? becouse i feel like gpu now days dont give u what they should for the money u spend. And so far im happy with this decision. Cyberpunk on ultra setting with ray tracing on medium with some options turn off and still haveing +/- 80fps in 1440p For 2 years thats enough.
Thank you for including MSFS 2020, today's Crysis game.
Upgrading from an Nvidea 1070 to either the XT or XTX. 1440p 144hz screen (may upgrade the framerate to 180+) so it'll be a pretty huge leap.
From all the research I've done, the XT seems to be the best value 1440p card on the market, but the XTX is incredibly tempting, though it is obviously geared more towards 4k and would be overkill for 1440p. I have the money to spare but I hate the idea of purchasing a better graphics card at worse value for money.
So what did you choose? I am in the same situation 😤
@@sawz_z Went XTX. Only an extra £100 and stronger in every department. More future-proof too. The more and more i've been researching the XTX after already buying it, the more confident i get that i made the right decision.
That being said, i also ended up buying a new PC all together, so bottlenecking isn't an issue for me, whereas it may be for you. Still, bottlenecking isn't the end of the world and it'll probably still worth it even with a bottleneck.
@@sparky844 Thank you. Where I am the XTX costs 200€ more than the XT. Planning to game on a 144/165hz 1440p monitor and a 4k 60hz Oled TV, I am going to build a all new system. Mine is 10 years old and going with a 7900 XTX will be a 2000% power increase 😅. It seems to be overkill for me at 4k 60 fps. But I also think future proof as I keep my PC for a very long time before changing the entire new system. Looking at benchmarks now doesn't give you the numbers for how it will perform in 5 years. So going overkill is maybe the solution. Which CPU/RAM did you choose?
@@sawz_z i chose Intel i9-13900KF. Also chose 2x16Gb (32Gb) ram, although 2x8Gb (16Gb) would gave worked just as well. You could probably push the framerate a bit higher than 165fps and maybe go for a 180to240hz monitor? The card can handle it for some games. I saw that on a 4k monitor on ultra settings, R6 could run at about 240fps on the XTX.
Really depends on your monitor, no point in paying an extra 100$ minimum for 1440p but 4k its a must. I had to upgrade my monitor from 1080p 60Hz to a good quality 1440p with real HDR10 and 170Hz totally worth it. For 4k screen with those capabilities it costs 40% more.
If I can get the 7900 XTX and the 4080 at the same price on marketplace which would you go with? It’s a 7900 xtx radeon reference card abs a tuf gaming 4080
4080 cost $450 more than the 7900 xt in my area
its crazy , the xt gets a bad wrap but its priced way better than xtx or 4080 , the more i look after my purchase a week ago the worse it gets
I think for people who buy from amazon and from outside the US the 7900 xt is by far the best option. After taxes the difference with the 7900 xtx is very large and the extra performance is not justified for that difference of more than 220 USD or more depending on the country...
what tools do you use to get the statistics and generate the frame time graphs?
Msi afterburner & riva tuner statistics, can be used with non msi gpu.
Undervolt the 4080 and the power is even lower for the same performance.
One good thing about the 40 series LOL
RTX 4080 costs 2000$ where I live...
And the XTX costs 1500$...
the xt really is best value here too
AMD has better p/f as always. I'd rather run a game at native resolution than with dlss which introduces visual glitches. And RT at 4k is stupid for the performance loss. Plus, I won't support a company that has terrible customer practices.
this
Nice video comparison. Question, which program u use to frame rate?
Msi afterburner
Value for money wise, it's clear the 7900XT is the winner.
7900 xt is the best price perfomance news gpus right now fow 4k or 1440p
You can hear Squidward at 2:19 😂
The 4080 performing that well while drawing less power is impressive
I will wait however for the 5000 BlackWell series to see if AI has improved the cards
It may use 50wts less than the xtx but it's worse in performance and also the 4080 costs 200 euros more than the xtx
@fnonpm , lol, you nvidia fanboys are something else , so all of sudden power power matters , rtx3080 was using 320 watts and rx6800xt 280watts , similar performance , but you fanboys didn't say amd better using less power, lol
Rtx4080 is $400.00 more than rx7900xt , performance only 10% difference , I can get a 7700x CPU and 1 tb ssd for $400.00 .
Dumb fanboy.
@@nephilimslayer are you blind? Hahaha it performed better in a couole niche games that don't sell many copies. Gtfoh fanboy
@@nephilimslayer You can play Cyberpunk with path tracing and DLSS3 at 100 Fps with 4080. 7900 is like 30 fps at this point with FSR.
@@club4ghz u use dlss which is not good.
I never use dlss or fsr... It ruins the game.
And cyberpunk is an Nvidia title... Of course it will have more fps.
When I attack Nvidia all people have to tell me about cyberpunk.... Well I never played that game and neither my cousins and friends.
If u wanna game with dlss then go ahead but if u put both cards native 4k at ultra settings without dlss and without ray tracing then the raster is better with AMD card
AMD really fumbled the ball on these cards compared to the RX 6000 series. The 300 watt power draw is actually insane! 😂
10-15% more wattage but getting a car £300 cheaper plus i have solar panels anyways so even if it would make much difference in electricity wouldn’t matter to me
best part to this whole thing is the 7900 XTX will drop by 200+ dollars by the time the 8900 XTX or 8950 XTX comes out and by then the 4080 will still be $1200+ till stock runs out f*cking funny to me.
but it's all irrelevant to me since going with w/e the next highest AMD GPU is anyway next year but I liked the video all the same :)
Nvidia keep walking in Apple footsteps.. They barely discount their GPUs.. which is BS move
AMD is like Android phones.. they fles more on discounts.. which is nice
Those with a 7900XTx or a 4080 are going to love 4K, 60-90Hz or 1440P, 120-240Hz. Med-High settings. Just not epic.
I wanna see these graphics cards put to the test with a bunch of things happening on the screen like when playing bf2042 the rush XL with 128 players on a small map pushes my rx6700xt to the max almost if not using all my vram maxed out.
That would just be CPU intensive.
@tmsphere unless my software is wrong my cpu in that situation is not even 50% my gpu is high 90% at almost all vram max
@@AlarakTheHighLord just because your cpu util isnt at 99 doesnt mean it wont be more cpu intensive than gpu
I have an rtx 6800xt and i am very happy with the efficiency. I undervolted it and i even underclocked it and now it peaks at 180w, is very quiet and i have 60fps 4k on high to ultra settings on almost all games. (Demanding games like red dead redemption)
Im not going to buy a graphicscard that uses 300watt because it gets so hot in my room so quickly. The heat production especially during summer is mad
I want a 1440p OLED display which is 240Hz. Is the 7900xtx abit overkill and I should get a 7900xt? The cpu I'm planning on getting is the 7800x3d.
If you only want gaming then AMD is killer. Ryzen processor+ AMD graphics = lethal combination.
The 7900xt is more than enough to play any videogame in existence!
@The Batman My 3600 and 2060 are still capable in modern titles albeit its starting to become obsolete (60 FPS 1080p Medium and around 70 at 1080p low). I know a 7900xtx will become obsolete for 4k gaming in 1 or 2 years. Right now the 7900xtx and 7900xt are better at 1440p than the 2080ti was at 1080p at launch. The 2080ti is still perfectly fine at 1080p and so is the 1080ti. 1% lows and .1% lows are only a problem if game optimization is bad (Fortnite, Lord of the Rings Gollum) or you are running out of VRAM, RAM or you CPU/GPU cannot handle the loads.
The 4080 is a terrible card in general. Its cost 200 more than the 7900xtx, and only has 16gb VRAM. Cost per frame is awful. Frame gen is not for me based on the games I play, and FSR 2 is fine for me.
Adding what you are saying the what I already know, the 7900xtx would be the best bet. 4090 is priced way to high at almost 1000 CAD more than the 7900xtx.
240hz is not good for these GPUs with the loud coil whine problem. You should better wait for the fixed custom versions if you really want to play 240fps. Only 160 fps lock is a solid solution. I can really recommend the 6950xt, it had mostly the same Performance like the 7900xt with way less coil whine and the prize for the Performance is way better.
If you play simple high fps shooters like overwatch, cs go, CoD, Apex it will runs on all games easy with 240 fps native 1440p and faster gpus like the 7900xtx Performance nearly the same, because the cpu bottleneck begins already at this fps area. If you play a game with a high perfomance impact, you have mostly the fsr2 upscaling solution if you really want it should run over the 200fps.
I upgraded my 6900xt to the 7900xtx paired with a 13700kf and the Performance increase is only in intensive singeplayer games. RT Performance is a way Higher but not for high fps gaming absolutly nonsense for the minimal image quality Upgrade.
I can really say, the new generation is overprized as hell.
RTX 4080 better
7900XT is $700 rn at Microcenter
Thanks for your real tests ♥️
XDDD
*Laughs at 13900k*
@@velk_wanggoudan ?
@@velk_wanggoudanthat cpu is more than enough at these resolutions
@@66kaisersoza seems that someone didn't understand
th-cam.com/video/wrcD9uo_On0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=sYhaH-2lTKtlzH4Z&t=1245 this is a real test
Finally someone did it i appreciate that you left ray tracing off just to see raw fps performance thank you
In oz the difference between 4080 and xtx is $150 - $200. 1550 vs 1750 . At that price 4080 def look better. At $200 US I can see ot may not be worth it.
what does oz mean?
@huynguyen-qv8zj Australia, sometime we use it as a short variant of Aus. Loosly refers to the land of Oz in wizard of Oz. We like to refer to ourselves like this, as we are on the other side of the world, distant...
@@nickmaddalena985 thanks for the info
In all scenarios.. 7900xtx 24GB with 380-bit bus is 50% more Bandwith power (4080 is 256-bit only)
4080 will not age well.. 16GB is a botteleneck for $1200 card (or $1750 in Aus as U said)
Don'r be fooled by RT & DLSS.. they only just extra.. U should focus more in pure power
U remember those 3080 back in 2020-2021 with it's 10GB ? where are they now? they barely can handle new heavy games which already using 12GB-14GB.. so the 16GB won't age well, unlike 24GB
@@Jack_Sparrow131 I feel even more sad for the people that went for the 3070 which is kinda outdated now already with its 8gb vram and costed like 1k euro at the time xD
In Europe the price difference between a 4080 and 7900xtx is like 200-300 euro
I've never used an amd card but they look promising but i've been hearing that they have a lot of issues with drivers and support in general that ppl who bought them are switching back to nvidia
Is it me or does the tones in the 7900xtx in some games just look more real. Like true to life reflections of how and what we actually see with our regular eyes. This is coming from a 4080 owner. Amazing. Great vid!
I think it's important to know that your monitor probably performs a little bit better in the middle in regards to color and light - and also the angle you view the screen at has something to say. And I just bought a 7900XTX!
Bought the 7900xt for about £400 cheaper than a 4080, nvidias prices are absurd.
So the 7900XTX is $1049 and RTX 4080 is $1199 and 7900XTX out performs it. Wow.
Nvidia price is alway higher, but they have a reason to do that, amd only for gaming, you cant do a lot of work with amd card.
@@lethanhtung4972Wow im so glad you said this as I use Photoshop and I was going to get the 7900XTX but as you said "you cant do a lot of work with amd card" thnx for the advice, I will use Nvidia instead.
@@Nite-Lite-Gamers i have an rx 6600 and i use it in after effect without any worries i don't think photoshop is more of a problem
@@Nite-Lite-Gamers He's right for studio and 3d workflow, nvidia cards are the only choice since they have drivers and cuda support for a wide range of software. AMD is sorely lacking when it comes to productivity.
@@lethanhtung4972 There are programms working much better with AMD so your argument is outdated.
No fucking way. Microcenter is selling an entire PC bundle capable of running as fast as a 4080 for the price of the 4080 alone...
I'm tired of this Idk why all the people complain about his graphic card, it's just unbelievable since we all know that the human eyes can only see 4gb of vram.
What?
God.... How do you get this comment? measure what an eye can see in terms of vram.
@@thomasmeunier6740It's supposed to be an iteration of a joke about how there's claims that the eyes only can see at 30fps (old meme)
Nah, you are all wrong. The human eye can't detect more than 4 gaming chairs and 2 feet of RGB strips.
so what am i missing here ? for some reason with same settings the memory used on the 4080 is way higher than on the amd cards. are these all nvidea supported/sponsored games?
I think for people who buy from amazon and from outside the US the 7900 xt is by far the best option. After taxes the difference with the 7900 xtx is very large and the extra performance is not justified for that difference of more than 220 USD or more depending on the country...
Yes in the US the biggest difference from the cheapest XTX and cheapest XT is 100$ when you add VAT it magically turns into 200$ difference.
@@tmspherebest price i found was its 180-250 more for only 12-15 fps more, itd be more wise to invest in a better cpu or better case/cooling system. i hit 2100$ with my xt build but everything is s tier in the build. with the xtx it wouldve been 2350$ after tax :/ its 4gb vram more but only 15 fps more so idk if its worth the 2-300 more for 15fps
@@fuckyoutubrforchangingthisit is not you did a great choice, in my county at least it’s 200$ for the cheapest XTX, if you want a good cooling like nitro its 300$ more this is almost a 4080, not worth it
@@antoine8563c3v I got the 7900xtx (150$ more)
Planning to get the xtx on black friday, what do yall think the price drop will be?
RX 7900 XTX for the win 😏
Cope
I know my 7900xtx came in at £898 prob base but more than capable. Depends if you want to fork put for the tuned xtx at £1000. Didn't really see much difference so saved some cash. But if you had 3 rigs running with no fps counter and no way of telling what's inside you wouldn't tell the difference playing unless you had super human eye sight. Enjoy what ever you have at the end of the day.
You should remove hitman 3 from the list, it can run on a 2gb graphic card laptop also
Facts
4080 is 1500, 7900xtx is 1000. is it worth 500 euros difference? not in today's games at least.
In india rx 7900xtx is cheaper then 4080 7900xtx costs around 1300$ and 4080 costs 1400-1500$ so 7900xtx is a better buy at this point
Frame generation work like magic it's make a big difference 40 to 50 % performace gain without the dlss upscale
In Russia, the RX 7900 XTX costs 1200$, as does the RTX 4080, the price is the same!
@@alitekken frame gen is only useful if u already getting above 60 below that its not enough frame in between to render
@@ghost4565 you can easily get 60 frame or more with dlss technology
@@alitekken i am talking about without any upscaling tech. And fram gen is not real frames, using dlss3 when u r already getting less then 60 is not beneficial. The real use of dlss3 in when u already getting high real frames. But then do u really need frame gen
I bought 7900xt and have had nothing but problems. Constant crashes and driver issues. Returned it and purchased a 4080 and have no complaints. Buy quality or buy twice
7900xtx a beast
Consuming 500w
@@lexavlogs7149 I see 350w and this is without UV.
@@lexavlogs7149 when overclocked, so?
@@wpheavyww they won't compare the xtx to the 4090 even though they both are the flagship because the 4090 literally shits all over every amd ever made
Слава Україні!
4080 consumes less wattage also a all-round card only if pricing $ 1050-1100
the 4080 is 400 euros more than the 7900xt.....
the 7900xt is clearly the winner.
i dont use ray tracing and i dont like to use dlss and fsr.
7900xt is the beast here
I don't use ray tracing either but DLSS saves my ass rn with my trusty old 2070 Super.
Buying a 1k+ dollar gpu to play basic rasta settings only lol. So braindead. If you want a basic looking game get a mid range card.
Also not much of a beast seeming it's down 30% from msrp only months after it got released with dog power consumption but you are a basic fps simpleton who doesn't understand it's more than just 1 number that makes a good card.
When is on ultra setting ray tracing is automatically on u don't need to activate it
@@gerald8573 yeah because Nvidia is stupid.
Dlss can give u more fps... But it lowers ur resolution..... I don't like to lower my resolution
U either play native or you don't.
My friend got the 2080 super 4 years ago for 800 euros... And I will pay 850euros to get the 7900xt.
Nvidia is not a good company.
They don't care about consumer's like us.
That's why my build is full AMD
@@meltinsr ray tracing is good but even the 4090 cannot play at 4k ultra with RT on maybe on 50 fps but that's trash... I need 80+ fps to game.
Maybe next year the new GPUs will be able to game at 4k with RT on
What do you use to run the tests? What program?
Bro he literally playing the games. The game is the test.
Msi afterburner + Riva tuner
@@ArnikoGiri 🤦
@@ArnikoGiri 🤦
@@ArnikoGiri🤦
Graphics doesn't matter much if a game is interesting. Your imagination will cover the gaps.
So true. Looking back at old games I don't at all remember them like that visually.
Best comment
7900XT is the best card they have ever released since the 400/500 series
Amd offers better preformance and better prices ❤️
What? Are u still willing good price/performance in flagships. Salute to you 🙂
@@Ayan-dk7xq , so just because its priced at $1200.00 you have to buy it , its dumb to spend as much money cause you gave it a tag "flagship" , lol
OK then anything past rtx4070ti or rx,7900xt is dumb , 20% more fps for 50% more price ,
You can get CPU and ssd for $400.00 , and rtx4090 is even more dumb $1600.00 ?? Flagship my azz , in a year its just another mid range GPU.
Hahaha you're blind
Before concluding compare the gpu power consumption in this video
@@Ayan-dk7xq It's also cheaper while having more vram. You get less vram for more money with the 4080.
Both AMD cards are reference designs. Buying AIB models instead will give an additional performance bump over that TUF 4080
7900 XT destroyed 4070 ti, ti s 7900 XTX destroyed 4080 super and 4090.
4090? nope, amd dont have analog of 4090, even close
i can grab a 7900xt for 610 bucks where i am what a bargain
those temps on the 4080 though wow!
I am surprised no one else mentioned this! 4080 is not even breaking a sweat, meanwhile the 7900xtx us over there SWEATING.
@@Itsdrax911still winning all the races tho even price.
@@tmsphere what is?
@@autumnleaf45 it’s ok. You live and learn ig.
wow power consumption on 4080 is amazing
Would the 7900xt be a decent upgrade from the 3080? Or just save and get a 7900xtx? I mainly play fps games like battlefield and apex at 4k and I use medium settings most of the time.
Wait for new gen, upgrading from 3080 to anything thats not 4090 is pointless for this gen
Not wort hthe upgrade unless you go straight to the 4090
You get maybe 30% uplift in fps , I would wait for next gen , rtx3080 might be OK until then . don't waste money even on rtx4090 .
Thanks guys I'll hold out for next Gen.
Check the power consumption in this video first
Now compare the 4080 vs 7900 xtx but using DLSS3 and frame generatio, all ultra Ray tracing on and see what happens :)
Then the 4080 would be sad in 4k as well still. Plus AMD has FSR in more games as well. DLSS is more of a gimmick than a selling point.
You mean the fake frames, your card does fake frames better but wait when FSR3 comes out y'all are gonna be enabling it on your cards instead ;)
@@tmspherelol frame gen on Nvidia is still so much better while keeping the picture quality
I think Amd 7900 XT is the go to one ,also 7900xtx is costlier considering there is hardly any difference which one can see in normal eye why would one buy Nvidia RTX 4080 apart from the brand value it is prized at almost $1400 + and in India $1600 . which is a huge amount .
to be fair, 4080 use less power (save electricity money in the long run i guess) and has lower temp
How is AMDs post sales services in India? Asking cause i haven't owned an AMD GPU
amazon.
@@AniketSingh-hr8mi AMD doesn't provide you after sales service but the board partners unless it's a founders edition. You should be concerned about after sales services from Sapphire, XFX, Asus, Galax, Zotac, Gigabyte, MSI, etc who actually turns GPU into a graphics 'card'. I would personally go with Sapphire if I would want to buy a AMD graphics card.
@@loremipsum1199 But I guess you won't be able to use a 4080 long enough to make money savings, since it's Vram will be too low in even newer games
I can't decide between RTX4080 and RX 7900 XTX.
I want to play 21:9 1440p
I only play games, and watch a lot of YT, anime and sites on PC. Also my PC idles A LOT during the day.
4080 more power efficiënt and vsr is nice for anime on browser
7900 XTX, very very very easily.
7900 XTX then, as you’re not a content creator or something. It’s better for gaming as where Nvidia is better overall for content creation
Without RayTracing the RTX 7900XTX is the much better card than the 4080
respect to AMD
Raytracing is kinda useless anyway, modern cards still not good enough to carry full rtx etc. games, I tried fortnite max settings on 2k monitor, it barely hits 90fps, with dlss it's a bit more than 110, but I am not a fan of dlss, it looks washed sometimes
Forgot to mention that it was 4090
Hello everyone I didn't quite understand what the screen resolution is on the test?
Dlss 3.0, RTX??? Sure the 4080 is on par in terms of rasterization, but does these types of benchmarks are not realistic, as in, I'm gaming with RTX ultra with at least 25% bump in fps, all the while consuming less power...
for 4K, should I just go 7900XT and save $200-$300?
Same question here, can't seem to decide
For sure guys, buy AMD and save
That moment when you forget to turn on Ray Tracing and DLSS and the 4080 still somehow beats both cards in efficiency
yeah sure.. pay extra $300 to get RT which will kill 50% of fps in all scenarios.. and call it efficiency
efficiency is disabling RT until 2025 with better hardware to be able to use RT without a serious 50% loss in fps
Also, most games RT is barely change anything, or it's half broken, majority of people who have 4000 series cards already turning of RT to get more fps as far as I seen reddit & steam threads
@@Jack_Sparrow131i have a 4080 and i can run every game with RT Max Settings 100 fps more or less In the newest games DLSS looks even better than native resolution + you have frame Generation that gives you a 109% performance boos while keeping the picture quality.
it depends on the resolution you play in but the majority still uses 1080p the second is 1440p and 4k is not much used.
So the 40 series cards are only worth when you have the 4080-4070 so you talk nonsense RT is only worth it if you have the right card ofc you cant expect a good experience with 8-10 GB with Raytracing on
in my country 4080 and 7900xtx are priced exactly the same, can even get some models of 4080 for cheaper then the options available for AMD. both cost around 1300 USD.
Before concluding that 4080 is worse than these two, you must compare the power consumption of these gpus and u will find out that 4080 consumes relatively less power
While costing 400 and 200 dollars more and also with less VRAM
I mean who really cares about power draw, unless your mining on the cards, but for your average gaming pc getting 20ish hours a week, it’s gonna cost you what an extra 20 bucks a year?
@@smedleyheadleygames29 what's more interesting is that 4080 outperforms these two gpus in some games like forza with relatively less power consumption and vram
@@bullymaguiregaming1757 yeah thats interesting wining one game of 8 >.> 4080 have a dissapoiment price
@@robertopazsoldan9641 not just one game, check the video