Camaro Wheelstander with HUGE Blower!!!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
- I don't own any of the rights to this video, It was created by Urban Hillbilly.
Here is a link to Urban Hillbilly's account:
/ urbanhillbilly
Some great footage on there!!!
Small clip of a 68 Camaro drag car that pulls some big wheelstands. Later in the video you see it with a MASSIVE!! blower on it.
P.S. - Be patient for the blower part.
LOL I think it's a roots blower from an EMD locomotive 567 prime mover. The funny thing is that if I'm right, that blower was made by GM. LOL
So it's where it belongs 😂
EMD was indeed owned by GM at the time
It was I remember hearing about it
It’s still from a freight train so what’s ur point
14 years later...you're exactly right, well, GM owned the company at one point GM EMD, or Electro Motive Division. It's either a 567 or 645 engine series blower. I made a career working in these engines as used in stationary power on offshore drilling rigs.
"EXPLAIN...THE GIANT...BLOWER."
And then my mouth freaking flies open at 2:25...this guy is just too cool!! XD
Found out about this on TikTok, insane😂
Same
Same
Same
Me too
Same
if that motor could sustain the boost from that blower, imagine the torque that car will produce, wtf i really hope they get it going...some how
it’s 12 years later. possibly.
@@asleepyyoutuber doubt it :( can’t find a pass on the internet
Yea tik tok or TH-cam this is the only clip
Put it on a limo or a Cadillac Herse
Blower is off an EMD 645 diesel engine, found in SD-40-2 diesel locomotives
Sd40-2s aren't blown
@@pootispiker2866 what locomotive is it from?
@@jack_orourke_sb Other comments suggest it's not from a locomotive but from an air compressor instead, which looks untrue. But given it's in the US there's an almost endless list of locomotives it could have come from
@@pootispiker2866they obviously are that’s where the blower came from
@@KenHughes-xj Shut up
jdoggybizzle told you where the blower came from umpteen pages ago. It's from an EMD 567 or 645 locomotive engine. It's a scavenging blower only and does not boost cylinder pressure. All it does is blow the spent gases out of the cylinder and provide a fresh air charge for the next cycle. It is a 2 stroke diesel with ported cylinder liners and is a terrific engine and very reliable
Woo man, that's a blower..killed 2 head gaskets too lol damn
If your blower doesn't have at least a 1 head gasket body count, do you even have a blower? Lol 😂👌
Thanks to that good roll cage you saved your self about 10 G's
Me, an Iowan: Oh, come on there, bud. Can't just blow the head gaskets. Open that puppy right up and VAPORIZE them like a man.
You got no hairs on your cobs or What?
That giant blower is the coolset thing I've ever seen, looks like a caricature. I would love to have heard it run, for the second or two that it did. Thanks for this one!
Probably around 5-10 pounds, but its not the psi that matters... it's the cfm when it comes to boosting a motor. Think 10psi through a straw and 10psi through a coffe can......
Any updates on it? They ever take it down the road
@Inklebonker1 Yup, they used it to solve the problem of engines running at a limited altitude due to the thinning of air but since the supercharger compresses air it greatly increased their ranges.
That's my dads old camaro. He sold it to Dan Navarro. It's a shame Mikey tried to take credit for the car. He did not own the car at the time.
What a down to earth kind of fellow
If it was off a freight train, that's a diesel, and would be more than that. Hell, my truck, stock, runs around 30lbs of boost. But you're 100% about it being more volume, not more pressure. HOWEVER, when it hits the restriction of the intake manifold, that air has nowhere to go as easily, and you'll get MUCH higher pressures. Think about putting your finger over a running garden hose.
What happened to this car just this one video
@Inklebonker1 WW2 didn't have fighter jets just prop planes like the P-51
When you figure in the sheer weight of the screws inside that (what I think) ventilation blower as well the power to turn them with enough force that would not bog the engine (I see no gear reduction of any kind other then belt cog) and produce pressure you start to fall into bull shit!
Not to mention it looked like a injection hat sitting on top, the fuel would have to fall around 2 plus feet & still be in a mist to be combustive!
It's BS to people that know blowers, & I do!
Amazing video That blower Is unbelievable. I would love to see it work. Thanks for posting.
Close, but when it comes to a blown head gasket it is the pressure that counts. Your comparison of a straw and a coffee can are spot on when considering what it takes to sustain combustion at a given boost level and at the same pressure there is a drastic difference in the volume of air they are transferring. However, when it comes to head gaskets, the surface area exposed to the cylinder bore is constant and volume has no effect, just pressure.
does somebody think, a bugatti veyron has a chance vs him? :D
i have the dvd of this and the crazy blower. The dvd is called CRASH FEST and the guy did say the blower might have come from a freight train. Pretty crazy.
Thanks for sharing
@68SSCAM they started it, but when they tried to rev it, lolz, they blew a headgasket!
Both head gaskets
hondas just dont understand camaro's and t/a's, they will never have this problem for as they are front wheel drive
th-cam.com/video/poBJCdFeJCo/w-d-xo.html
he said outlaw 10.5 so its running 2000 hp if i remember correct
2020🤘🏼 what happened to this car tho saw it years and years ago and nothing since
Idk what happened with that blower at least, but from what I can tell from another commenter who said it came off an EMD 645 diesel engine, that giant diesel (an EMD 16-645-E6) used two of those blowers to supply 16 cylinders each of 645 cubic inches displacement with the necessary air. Other models used a hybrid turbo-supercharger that was gear driven via centrifugal clutch at low RPM and went full exhaust gas driven at higher rpm (like above 500 rpm or something). These beasts made upwards of 4000 horsepower at their 950 rpm redline, that's like 23 to 24 thousand foot-pounds of torque, hella monstrous those were.
@zachlutes I know you are right about the diesels, I am a diesel mechanic and have seen several of the old blowers you are talking about. Trust me, I know from experience that mine shaft blowers HAVE been used on hot rods, I have one myself.
Aerzen Positive Displacement Blowers (of the "Roots Blower" type design) have been manufactured since 1868 and today are highly developed standard production machines designed and adapted for a broad range of applications.
@68SSCAM That big block will get it turning, then the charger provides boost to the motor very quickly turning up the RPM's. Of course it will work, just the head bolts and everything else will stretch with that kind of boost put into it and cause catastrophic failure. If it was designed for a train, the diesel engine probably had at least 3/4" head bolts trying to hold it all together.
1:21 at least u only gotta do body work on 1 side now haha
Blowers have been used for 70 Plus years on many different modes of transportation. The blowers that most people are familiar with such as the 6-71 and 8-71 all the way up to the 12-71 were originally on Detroit Diesel motors. The 6-71 was used on the 6V71 Detroit 2 stroke diesel engine and the 8-71 was used on the 8V71 Detroit diesel and so on. My father used to have an old Peterbilt with a supercharged 8V92 Detroit diesel. You can hear an old 2 stroke Detroit for miles. Very distinct sound
nothing better than the sound of a screamin jimmy
had this urban hill billies vhs got dust in though smh by far my favorite drag racing tape
In regards to the train engine blower. Just one cylinder on a prime mover is around 420 cubic inches. The max rpm of said engine is also about 2000rpms. So this blower would need a 12" diameter pulley to keep it in range. Lol.
it didn't break the bar, there's a mount that the wheelie bar is bolted too that was broken or cracked before the race. Should have checked the car before he drove onto the starting line
@87irocz350TPI lol biased opinion...there are plenty of muscle cars that can achive higher power with turbos then a blower which needs power to make power.
WICKED! these cars are insane.. Cant beat a v8.
The blower came off a EDM 567 Prime mover engine and those engines by the looks of it had not 1 but 2 of those blowers
@000JoshuaMcClure000 Blow your mind dude...spend your money in sicky iron...the show is over a gasoline is finished...
I never said I don't believe you. I'm stating a fact, & the fact is that in the 1st generation Camaro's..."O-N-L-Y" the 1967 had vent window's. The '68's did not! The grille in this car is a 1968, & I suppose it's possible that the doors are from a 1967. Why don't you look that up? Clearly I'm over-it either way!
10 1/2" cars are sooo anoying for the other drag racers out there, cant go a season without one of them things crashing and dumping shit all over the track! i mean honestly who puts 10 1/2" wheels on one of these cars? there is no way to control them, they spin way more than they grip!
@Inklebonker1 Contradiction in terms there. "Inline 16"....for one....eludes to a PISTON engine, not a "fighter JET".....and two.....the WWII fighters used mainly either V-12 Allison or Merlin piston engines or some type of radial piston engine. Just clearing the air. ;)
@Spikito he he he....After all that trouble of adapting they probably should have ran 1 quarter triparillo dont you spose???? heh heh heh.with all the boost available the blown head gaskets shouldnt have been noticable....right? gwahahahaha.
at 1:12 when the car is at the starting line. You can see that the bars are already tweaked. You would think that someone would have noticed before then. I'm not blaming anyone, it's not like i haven't overlooked things in the past.
@soulfire22 From Wikipedia:
"The Roots design was commonly used on two-stroke diesel engines"
referring to Roots blowers.
soulfire22, you do know diesels use superchargers don't you? Ever hear of a 12v71 or a 16v71 two stroke Detroit Diesel? Some of those were factory made twin supercharged and quad turbo charged ON THE SAME MOTOR
@soulfire22 You don't even now how to spell DIESEL so I highly doubt you know anything about them... The car wasn't altered on PhotoShop. Also, diesel engines use superchargers as well as turbochargers.
@midgetmayo ya i know right my grammar is ok compare 2 most people ,i just took out a few letters sometimes ,u really havn't seen much have you ,jeez randomly troll'n noob lolbar
oi
this dude is cool he kinda reminds me of jello from DKs haha
but yeah thats a huge blower hahah blew both head gaskets hahaha thats funny hahaha
and camaros are awesome
the end
:P
@bruce51501 He said they got it running with the huge blower....but as soon as they blipped the throttle...it blew out all the gaskets....and they never tried again.
Booooooooo, no more restrictions, thats why it's called Outlaw 10.5!
If you want to race in a tire class they have others you can enjoy, but leave the Out;aw 10.5 alone!
@CrazyForCooCooPuffs blowers are bad, for your honda, mainly coz your hona id producing half the power needed to feed the blower, take ya turbos and begone.
How much boost with a locomotive supercharger? Well, let's just put it this way: Take a GP-9 loco. (has a roots blower similar to the one on the car.) The blower from this loco is designed for its 12 - 16 cylinder (typically) motor with a 10" stroke, 8.5" bore, and 6 valves per cylinder. Remember, this is displacing 567 cubic inches PER CYLINDER on a V12-V16. Max RPM on the loco is around 800RPM: a car's idle. So... take a blower that is maxed out at a car's idle, blip the throttle, and boom.
some body needs to envent a head gasket so that guy can use that blower on the motor and i would love to hear it with out blowing the head gaskets
@acekazel still shocked that it was a rolls royce merlin engine that was the first. but i do remember that turbo charging was horrid for fighter planes.
@abcanimal Who the hell would want soo much torque....thats it's not even driveable
if you don't believe me go on Google, the 67's front end doesn't match the Camaro in this video but the 68's does so its clearly a 68
well i just searched on google and looked at the EMD567 engine. its slightly smaller but it is indeed a train supercharger
68 people are mad because they cant put a blower on their honda civic
@soulfire22 "PHOTO"-Shop does not work on "VIDEO", maybe a "videoshop".......If there was such a thing, get ya facts right!
Hahahaha,,,,,, I'm not suprise it's a americain car...! Chevy chevy chevy ! Camaro Camaro Camaro ! Ohh wow.. That's a bad car !
cars fint just replace door finder and quater panel and it should be good lol
@stevefromPA2 people do it all over the place. Ask anyone who races dirt track (not sprint cars) and you will see.
'67 this car hasn't any sidemarker lamp on the fenders or quarter panels and it has vent windows. 68 gille though.
holy shit ive seen that photo so many times and always thought it was fake i look at it now and im just like OMG!
does anyone have any idea how much torque and horsepower the motor would haev with that fuckign freight blower!!
@nicholas22288 why do you exactly need top fuel ?
like it's the best and most important race in the world -_-
stop right there...uve stepped into insanity when ur racing and spending more on the car than ur winning..
that's the only thing american cars can do flip up side down the tracks can hardly finish the race hahaha.
welding the heads on maybe? i don't know... i'd definitly find a way to drive that thing... even once....
Respond to this video... and its obviously not Photoshoped wth its just old camera lol
please find away to make that blower work man oh god hell with head gaskets wield them on
@abcanimal i would kill to see that blower on one of those mini civic hatches!! hahahaha
why not just put wheels on the blower itself and drive that down the track instead
most deff a '67 camaro.
'68 had one piece front windows with no vent. hate me...
what i want to see is that camaro at idle with that blower on it ..
@TrickedOutRam not at all, the s2000 isnt fwd, whatever MUSCLE OWNS IMPORT!!!
that isnt even close to the size of a normal train blower. that a bunch of bs
put that blower on a chevy 632 and let the front wheels hit the clouds! lol
I don't think that car would move with blower that size.
@cfisher30 It's my opinion that the end blower is BS! I'm not sure what side you on as my original post called it BS as well. The only way this would run is if it was missing it's screws and had some sort of induction on the engine inside the blower. I can't see how this engine would even get started & even if it did by some act of God, the engine would be ingesting a air fuel mix from 3+ feet away! Pouring gas over a kitchen mixers paddles on high would net better results! It's 100% BS!
@bruce51501 lol no shit, its way to big for that engine
loooooooow, que força bruta é essa!!!!!
DId he ever get this to work or it a lost case that we will never see????
@Inklebonker1 jets dont use superchargers. and the only WWII fighter jet i know about was the germans ME-262. No one else was using fighter jets at that time. There were some supercharged aircraft engines however. The P-51 had a blower on it. Im sure there were some more.
broken tab....looks like a structural failure..or way to much pressure for the givin power or weight.
worked on many 16v645 (emd,s) or big freight train engines (pre 4stroke and pre iraq war$) .
2 stroke big diesels that wine at 800rpms. thanks for the vid!!!!
The 645 actually ran at 900, not 800. 800 revs was last seen with 567 B blocks
@ramairgto72 Maybe not. It would have to have some enormous injectors but with the amount of fuel it would have to pump without running lean, I don't think a conventional ignition system to fire it. Plus everyone is talking about engine power to turn it? Try finding a starter that might tun it. Even a high torque would squirm at the thought of turning that sucker over.
An aluminum engine block DOES make a car go faster. Aluminum versus steel is a 300-400 pound difference. That's 300 pounds less that they have to pull down the strip. Less weight = higher power/weight ratio = faster car.
still being light cna only go so far before you have to put the weight back so you can plant the wheels into the ground. especially if your running a fat tire or AWD
@soulfire22 okay mister no it all.... hope you're not being serious.
@Inklebonker1 _CONT_ to force more air into the engine to prevent the engine from loosing power at high altitudes. At higher altitudes (doesn't matter if its a car or aircraft) air is thinner and the air fuel mixture in the engine becomes offset in a way that the engine does not produce enough power. Even right now i might be off on some facts because right now IM TIRED and don't feel like researching this thoroughly, so im just reciting from memory.
@GeneralTJWillys Okay i was tired then but what i meant to say referred to the fact that the aircraft in ww2 were classified in mainly 2 categories the radial engine aircraft (lots of power less aerodynamically advanced, confined to lower altitude) and the v engine aircraft (adequate power great aerodynamics, and could fly at higher altitudes) they could fly at higher altitudes because they use superchargers. Superchargers and other types of forced induction are desighned _CONT_
My dad knows that guy he lives up the street
Whay is the word Honda even on this page, go aways ricers. geeezz.
@Sodiumreactor when i said "fighter jets" get rid of the "jets"
haha wow, that was cool though. the wheelie not the other shit
@sherlock2588 The turn signals say otherwise
@68SSCAM not quite. sure, it needs to be turned first, but have you ever had one of those things? you can turn them by hand easily. now, one that big is a different story, but the engine could still do it. theyre only hard to turn at higher speeds, where its already helping the engine out by giving it more air
@ethanhoda1992 yea i was like wait that doesnt look like a 68
@J71CHEVY dude i have a vid of this stuff and family was there tell ur friend this was 1 of thoose old camers that came in in the early 1990's so it obviously has really bad quality compared 2 new camera's
- friend of lastabc
15 years later……it still hasn’t made a pass
@dexter2433 planes used superchargers because they were more affective than turbos at higher altitude (p51 mustang, spitfire, p38 lightning)