i remember seeing this years ago, to whoever made this, thank you, these types of videos are implanted on my brain in a good way this comment may be below, 0 likes where no one can see it, but thank you, this really gave me nostalgia
That's actually a really smart design, you can see that the planks rotate and put out their flat sides, spreading out the impact force. That's why it can take so many hits.
3:26 notice a few of the pieces had angular cuts it them. Thermite Shaped Charges were obviously used. As if some marbles would knock this structure down.
Axemonk *O>O NO WAY! There are no physical properties other than mass involved here. Wood, glass, concrete, arent used. This is generc physical material. (IE, the amount of force to knock over a tower of the same size made of sponge, would be equal to the amount of force required to take down this. In blender or the engine of course. This isnt real life.)* EDIT: now i feel like a fucking dipshit
PieceOfPersia they already use it, well Bullet Dynamics anyway. Not on the buildings though which is unfortunate. (though probably a good thing, given how some people play)
For me the most fascinating part of physics structures in games is finding ways to push them to the absolute limit of their integrity, finding that absolute sweet spot where just the tiniest nudge, the most minimal application of force, creates a catastrophic cascading failure. Whether it's creating bridges with overlapping stress zones in Bridge Builder and watching as they begin snapping links under weight of multiple cars before finally giving way under the last tiny lightweight car, delicately hammering away at a massive structure till it grumbles and groans in Red Faction Guerilla with a final hammer blow sending it toppling, or developing some monolithic medieval siege engine that will shatter into chunks of wood and steel bracing with a simple twist of a motor in Besiege, I never. get. tired. of. it. I can't even figure out why it's so fascinating to 'just barely' demolish stuff, people say there's no kill like overkill, but I guess for me, there's no kill like precisely measured kill.
ok. I swear. If one more person says that it was an inside job, I am going to freak out. This is an unrealistic computer generated model. In an actually building, there would be rooms, which makes the building easier to knock down! And I don't get why people think this is all about 9/11 in the first place. Cant a guy make a model of a building and throw some balls at it without people starting WWIII in the moment section?????
The real question on what you think happened on 9/11 is this...Do you think that if we went out into the desert and rebuilt the towers, and then flew some planes into them, would we get the same results?...of coarse no people in the buildings and the planes being flown by remote. "I shouldn't have to clarify that but the NSA is reading this you know...so" ...So it Cost around 400 million to build the trade center back in the late 70's and 80's and we were spending 720 million a day in Iraq...I don't know how to adjust for inflation .but it seems like a pretty small investment to put the hole thing to rest.But I don't know what do you think?
***** Ok...I don't want to be mean but ..."Why on earth would you waste money on that?"...400 million plus inflation to rebuild the buildings...720 million a day for a war?...It is estimated that the war is going to cost us over 6 trillion dollars in the end with veterans bills and all..conservative low end estimates are at 4 trillion.Harvard and yale are where those numbers come from feel free to look them up.So the cost of doing an experiment like that is insignificant.The point of doing an experiment like that would not be to convince the conspiracy theorists.It would be to convince the believers. Your quote....... "The fact is, that if you do a little research on how a controlled demolition is done, the amount of planning, wiring and preparation it takes, you would realize how unrealistic it is, that there were bombs inside.".......That is why so many people think it is an inside job...Because they have done research into what it would take to do a controlled demolition to that scale.Building 7 was as obvious a controlled demo as you could ever get.To accept anything other than that without an unimaginable amount of proof is irresponsible.It is about accountability Most of us want the perpetrators of that Tragedy to be held accountable for there actions..So here's the thing...... if you truly believe that the buildings fell from planes alone, when the architects stated many times publicly that they were designed to withstand MULTIPLE hits from commercial air crafts.Then Why have we not dragged the people who built those buildings out in front of congress to explain why 3 buildings designed to take multiple impacts from 737's fell so quickly and so completely with just 1 per building?And why did building 7 implode from some minor office fires? Did they use sub standard material? did they cut corners? pay off building inspectors? These are basic question that should be asked and are asked any time any building fails in any sort of way.I have been in construction my entire life. I some hands on experience in what I am talking about...Now I am not one of those guys who is saying the government did it or it was an inside job or aliens did it or anything. I am saying that basic common sense has been suppressed when it come to this tragedy...We are now 17 trillion dollars in debt...that is like 55 or 60k a piece for every american....We mathematically can never pay that back....It would be nice to know at some point that everyone who had any part at all in this was held accountable. Because it has destroyed soooooooooooo much.
.... you could run that in a IBN 5200... there wasn't really any algorithm for it either, BF4 has a building crumble as well, and many times more complex, and the xbox360 runs it fast, and 600$ laptops these days are better than the xbox360 -_-
Naofumi Echizen NO, actually videogame Physics are far below complex physics... It looks pretty, but they are not complex physics like the ones used for ballistics research or astronomy
8 core high end processor.. that exaggerating.. alot, that program used in the video, yes hard, but easily could be run by a cheap laptop(200$) the physics in BF4 are, well way beyond than in this video, imagine other games..
Naofumi Echizen in bf4 the demolition is hardcoded. The building on siege of Shanghai falls the Same way, in Every game. It wasnt even simulated once at dice Supercomputer and then replayed in the game. They created the animation ! Its Not simulated everytime it happens like the demolition in this Video so there is no sense in compairing them. I really wish they would Do at least a simplified real demolition but where you could take down the whole city :D
you could use this in army and make a building like the tokyo tower and arrange the bullets every time and see which is the most efficient way to destroy it
Short Circut Fan Excuseeeeeee me, lets not jump to conclusions here. I am a seagull my self and I bring left over fish to my friend pelican (Andrew) and he knows how much food America feeds us. He would never do such a thing. His people love America. It was those dumb clownfish. hey, what day is it?
Blender. It's actually very easy to do cause you only build the thing in 3D set the course of those balls adjust some basic settings and then make the physics engine do its work by baking the resulting animation into memory (one click) then you will add materials lightning background and let it render frame by frame (so that it looks so realistic) that takes the most of the time depending on the computer one frame could take up to half hour to look good but usually it takes couple of minutes and for fastest computers even seconds for one frame so this animation could be made over the course of several weeks even but I doubt that it was actually that long process in this particular example anbyway after that you just make the pictures into frames of a video upload it to youtube and it's done not really that hard
***** Not really, real-time physics are more complicated than ray tracing by far. Ray tracing can and often is done offline so naively you do not need to use any special data structures or algorithms to simplify the data set. Most ray tracers will do this, but it is not a requirement for most ray tracing implementations to scale down to real-time. The Bullet physics API, on the other hand, is designed for real-time application.
Molten metal was found under the rubble for about a couple of weeks after it happened. Jet fuel can't burn hot enough to melt beams...so if it weakened them and it fell because of that, what was the molten metal from? We saw it pouring out of the floors in all kinds of videos.
Did anyone notice that the building was fine as long as the antenna stood. As soon as the antenna collapsed, the rest of the building followed. Coincidence? I think not
+Царь бббомба so you have never heard of the wormhole theory of bending space and time to create a "portal" to anywhere else in space, even another universe? yes, I am ten.
+Maxsgcrew no, no it isn't. they even detail how a verizon building, a church and some of the other nearby structures were destroyed by the falling debris.
CockpumpVideo Wtf? It's a KEVA plank tower, what were you expecting? Do you also look at houses built of cards and go "That's stupid and unrealistic"???
First I would like to congratulate the computer programmer and mathematician who compiled this programme to simulate all this. Excellent simulation. This building is made of planks which are unconnected and they rest on each other using gravitational effects. If this was a concrete building with the joints connected to each other the building would have taken much more punishment. Also this is not a building with rooms, but planks on top of each other without any connection. If more spaces were made to form rooms, they the differential equation would be so much different. May I mention the fact that in this building the planks are so close together that the diagonal effect is not felt. When walls are used and a lot of space is left in between walls and ceilings, well a room of four walls without ceilings will be afffected diagonally as a square without diagonals will oscillate diagonally, A triangular room would not. So this is indeed a good simulation but does not represent a building which accommodates people. It is a good learning algorithm in preparation for more complex ones. In countries where earthquakes occur, connected structure is better and it would behave differently. Once I had a problem with a skyscraper that was made with connected vertical and horizontal members and the top storey oscillated dramatically and we had to introduce a few diagonals in the structure to stabilize it. Connected structures are best and they need to have diagonals if possible as relying on the joint will cause a lot od stress on the joints.
This is a neat idea to build buildings of this nature because the structure will with stand blast of scale . The structure beams will go in to strengthen it self as I can see . The only time that the structure had failed is when all the boards moved and over balance to one side . There are ways to correct this from happening . With steel beams . Then the wood would push back and make the building stronger .
This is really sad, I remember seeing this video when I was 7 I am now 13, this brings back so many memories of the good old days when there was this stuff on TH-cam, this may get no likes, but thank you for my childhood
![Plank Town Destruction - Blender [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Q1VCLFJY250/mqdefault.jpg)
![Plank Town Destruction - Blender [HD]](/img/tr.png)
I used to love this as a kid and watching this again gives me nostalgia
Yo same!
Same dude!!!
Same
Same
Same!
Great TH-cam nostalgia, the graphics in this Physics Engine looked amazing even for 2009. And they still hold up pretty well today.
i remember seeing this years ago, to whoever made this, thank you, these types of videos are implanted on my brain in a good way
this comment may be below, 0 likes where no one can see it, but thank you, this really gave me nostalgia
-Magi- SunnyAxloth it’s the same story for me as well
Same
Same as a kid i watched this and i loved it i felt so mighty
Yea some for me boieee
Same, watched these when I was little.
i used to love this stuff when i was a kid, now i'ts gone
Ar Hent same
I love when history repeats in model stuff like I have Legos and I build a Titaanic and make it sunk
That's actually a really smart design, you can see that the planks rotate and put out their flat sides, spreading out the impact force. That's why it can take so many hits.
3:26 notice a few of the pieces had angular cuts it them. Thermite Shaped Charges were obviously used.
As if some marbles would knock this structure down.
Fucking great troll dude XD love it
marbles cant break wood beams
Axemonk *O>O NO WAY! There are no physical properties other than mass involved here. Wood, glass, concrete, arent used. This is generc physical material. (IE, the amount of force to knock over a tower of the same size made of sponge, would be equal to the amount of force required to take down this. In blender or the engine of course. This isnt real life.)* EDIT: now i feel like a fucking dipshit
*****
The joke > O
Your Head > O
Breen Whitman
, ,
, ,
Another one of those videos where you just can’t understand why people would dislike it
I remember watching this as a little kid it was so satisfying
something about watching this... just so fascinating.
I love this video I watched this a lot since I was young in the early 2010s
Imagine this kind of buildings physics in a gta game..
That would happen in at least 10 years from now
Just Cause 3?
pretty much......
PieceOfPersia everything will be rubble in minutes lol
PieceOfPersia they already use it, well Bullet Dynamics anyway.
Not on the buildings though which is unfortunate. (though probably a good thing, given how some people play)
The strength of low-scale simulated wood is so great.
Large amounts of bullets find difficulty in demolition of low-scale simulated wood.
For me the most fascinating part of physics structures in games is finding ways to push them to the absolute limit of their integrity, finding that absolute sweet spot where just the tiniest nudge, the most minimal application of force, creates a catastrophic cascading failure. Whether it's creating bridges with overlapping stress zones in Bridge Builder and watching as they begin snapping links under weight of multiple cars before finally giving way under the last tiny lightweight car, delicately hammering away at a massive structure till it grumbles and groans in Red Faction Guerilla with a final hammer blow sending it toppling, or developing some monolithic medieval siege engine that will shatter into chunks of wood and steel bracing with a simple twist of a motor in Besiege, I never. get. tired. of. it. I can't even figure out why it's so fascinating to 'just barely' demolish stuff, people say there's no kill like overkill, but I guess for me, there's no kill like precisely measured kill.
Thats weirdly satisfying :D
Shut up
+Boom Headshot :DDD
Ikr
so true.....😅
So shooting balls. at KEVA planks are satisfying.
Daaamn, I saw this back in 2010, has it really been that long ago?
Pi
That's only five years ago.
@Mohammed Alkhodary Naaaaaaaah. It's still 2015! R-right?
Ahh. Those where the good ol days of my TH-cam binges.
ok. I swear. If one more person says that it was an inside job, I am going to freak out. This is an unrealistic computer generated model. In an actually building, there would be rooms, which makes the building easier to knock down! And I don't get why people think this is all about 9/11 in the first place. Cant a guy make a model of a building and throw some balls at it without people starting WWIII in the moment section?????
Why would anyone ever accept that an airplane could knock down a building? And if it did why would you not sue the hell out of whoever built it?
dont be silly 9/11 was such a set up take your head out of the ground and dont be so naive
It was an inside job. An airplane cannot take down a building. There were bombs installed in the building.
The real question on what you think happened on 9/11 is this...Do you think that if we went out into the desert and rebuilt the towers, and then flew some planes into them, would we get the same results?...of coarse no people in the buildings and the planes being flown by remote. "I shouldn't have to clarify that but the NSA is reading this you know...so" ...So it Cost around 400 million to build the trade center back in the late 70's and 80's and we were spending 720 million a day in Iraq...I don't know how to adjust for inflation .but it seems like a pretty small investment to put the hole thing to rest.But I don't know what do you think?
***** Ok...I don't want to be mean but ..."Why on earth would you waste money on that?"...400 million plus inflation to rebuild the buildings...720 million a day for a war?...It is estimated that the war is going to cost us over 6 trillion dollars in the end with veterans bills and all..conservative low end estimates are at 4 trillion.Harvard and yale are where those numbers come from feel free to look them up.So the cost of doing an experiment like that is insignificant.The point of doing an experiment like that would not be to convince the conspiracy theorists.It would be to convince the believers. Your quote....... "The fact is, that if you do a little research on how a controlled demolition is done, the amount of planning, wiring and preparation it takes, you would realize how unrealistic it is, that there were bombs inside.".......That is why so many people think it is an inside job...Because they have done research into what it would take to do a controlled demolition to that scale.Building 7 was as obvious a controlled demo as you could ever get.To accept anything other than that without an unimaginable amount of proof is irresponsible.It is about accountability Most of us want the perpetrators of that Tragedy to be held accountable for there actions..So here's the thing...... if you truly believe that the buildings fell from planes alone, when the architects stated many times publicly that they were designed to withstand MULTIPLE hits from commercial air crafts.Then Why have we not dragged the people who built those buildings out in front of congress to explain why 3 buildings designed to take multiple impacts from 737's fell so quickly and so completely with just 1 per building?And why did building 7 implode from some minor office fires? Did they use sub standard material? did they cut corners? pay off building inspectors? These are basic question that should be asked and are asked any time any building fails in any sort of way.I have been in construction my entire life. I some hands on experience in what I am talking about...Now I am not one of those guys who is saying the government did it or it was an inside job or aliens did it or anything. I am saying that basic common sense has been suppressed when it come to this tragedy...We are now 17 trillion dollars in debt...that is like 55 or 60k a piece for every american....We mathematically can never pay that back....It would be nice to know at some point that everyone who had any part at all in this was held accountable. Because it has destroyed soooooooooooo much.
This software is incredible :O
Remember: In this simulation, the pieces are not screwed together, it's just it's own weight.
watching this as a kid, and now watching this as a teenager, brings the 2013 nostalgia that I had back then
I use to love these when I was small
x2
I read the title as Over 5000 Ikea planks building - Bullet Physics
Metoo
OMG I cannot imagine the magnitude of the algorithms here! Plus, you would need at least a 8 Core High End processor to run this
.... you could run that in a IBN 5200... there wasn't really any algorithm for it either, BF4 has a building crumble as well, and many times more complex, and the xbox360 runs it fast, and 600$ laptops these days are better than the xbox360
-_-
Naofumi Echizen NO, actually videogame Physics are far below complex physics... It looks pretty, but they are not complex physics like the ones used for ballistics research or astronomy
8 core high end processor..
that exaggerating.. alot,
that program used in the video, yes hard, but easily could be run by a cheap laptop(200$)
the physics in BF4 are, well way beyond than in this video, imagine other games..
Naofumi Echizen in bf4 the demolition is hardcoded. The building on siege of Shanghai falls the Same way, in Every game. It wasnt even simulated once at dice Supercomputer and then replayed in the game. They created the animation ! Its Not simulated everytime it happens like the demolition in this Video so there is no sense in compairing them. I really wish they would Do at least a simplified real demolition but where you could take down the whole city :D
you could render that on a acorn 12 mhz if you had 1 billion years.
i remember watching this back in probably 2010, i honestly don't know why i liked these. this, YTP's and dominos.
you could use this in army and make a building like the tokyo tower and arrange the bullets every time and see which is the most efficient way to destroy it
Bullets cant melt steel beams.
What hell have I started
+UnitexB yeah. it was clearly crocodiles to blame
Short Circut Fan
no, didn't you see the clownfish? crocodiles are innocent
Unless it was those dam pelicans
Short Circut Fan
Excuseeeeeee me, lets not jump to conclusions here. I am a seagull my self and I bring left over fish to my friend pelican (Andrew) and he knows how much food America feeds us. He would never do such a thing. His people love America. It was those dumb clownfish.
hey, what day is it?
How do you even simulate gravity to this amazing degree in a computer? i'm impressed
Blender.
It's actually very easy to do cause you only build the thing in 3D set the course of those balls adjust some basic settings and then make the physics engine do its work by baking the resulting animation into memory (one click)
then you will add materials lightning background and let it render frame by frame (so that it looks so realistic)
that takes the most of the time depending on the computer one frame could take up to half hour to look good but usually it takes couple of minutes and for fastest computers even seconds for one frame
so this animation could be made over the course of several weeks even but I doubt that it was actually that long process in this particular example
anbyway after that you just make the pictures into frames of a video upload it to youtube and it's done
not really that hard
dligac
This isn't Blender, it's Bullet Physics. And physics calculations are actually pretty simple and easy compared to, say, raytracing.
dligac What?You can make this in a blender?Lol isnt it for mixing fruits?
***** Not really, real-time physics are more complicated than ray tracing by far. Ray tracing can and often is done offline so naively you do not need to use any special data structures or algorithms to simplify the data set. Most ray tracers will do this, but it is not a requirement for most ray tracing implementations to scale down to real-time. The Bullet physics API, on the other hand, is designed for real-time application.
Gravity is easy to code. Collisions and rigid body simulation much harder and need optimize.
Possibly the earliest TH-cam videos that I've ever watched...
That was 78 balls, in case you were wondering
The silence is killing my ears.
What idiot fired that shot at 0:31, 1:32, and 2:47? That wasn't even close!!
this is a animation!
I know, but the maker of the animation had control over the shots fired, and that shot was way off...
nope probably made it choose itself lol lazy animator :{
I come back here often
Still the best video on youtube
Molten metal was found under the rubble for about a couple of weeks after it happened. Jet fuel can't burn hot enough to melt beams...so if it weakened them and it fell because of that, what was the molten metal from? We saw it pouring out of the floors in all kinds of videos.
so real O_O this could be new minecraft with destroyable high quality lil things O_O
how long did it take for the physics to be processed
I don't know how I ended up on this video, but I got mesmerized and I watched til the end. :)
Conspiracy Theorists 2015: 9/11 The Game
10/10 IGN would jihad again.
+Christine Le I say 1000/10
9/11 simulator right there
Did anyone notice that the building was fine as long as the antenna stood. As soon as the antenna collapsed, the rest of the building followed. Coincidence? I think not
If these blocks were in real life, it would be hell to pick up all of the blocks again
And Moments later the American Dream died.
***** ROFL okay mr. biology professor. earth is flat
+Царь бббомба so you have never heard of the wormhole theory of bending space and time to create a "portal" to anywhere else in space, even another universe? yes, I am ten.
+Царь бббомба Geology *
Should've built WTC out of this stuff. Much more resilient.
+Keyboard Dancers Well yeah, if we had unbreakable chunks of anything that would probably be very good material, but in the real world, we don't.
+Keyboard Dancers Take into account the fact that he launched the balls at a corner of the base.
How can we do this ? What software ?
uthhcfhbuyjyyufhfhjvhkgjfhcjh. v. ktjjgyhfjtlgjrjjgjtpf'gkfibfjgjgojjkoggjg'glyhf'lfngkgkhggkkgjgkvjgjjt'ielAiAAZjjc''tog'vv,gvjk/@cjfhjtjgjcj
Used Blender for this.
Sheraz Malik lkkklf,.fFhg
Zaid Naoum
I see your pet dog was typing...
Dan Trigona ha ha you right. lol
fail, you didnt use airplanes
also building weaker than twins
Do you mean 9/11?
no, 11/9
cjfjdhfhudhvsugzkxghxykiiuiiirfbgdjfdnkfxhhcghuhghyfthugbxvbbbb
cu
00:52 JENGA!!!
Where did you get this Nasa computer?!
oh you can buy that in any NASA general store....lol
hehe :D
o
The physics in this simulator seem super realistic. Well done.
did anyone else think about 9-11 when they saw this?
sr pelo?
This is a model of justin beiber's life!
sxemo
1:32 YOLO
Great demos of Bullet Physics engine.
the amount of 9/11 jokes is unreal
That's completely unrealistic. We all know that buildings fall perfectly straight down into their own footprint.
that´s what your goverment said
Well red lunch it's a simulation smart Alec it's suppose to do that and this is accurate unlike ur face
+Maxsgcrew no, no it isn't. they even detail how a verizon building, a church and some of the other nearby structures were destroyed by the falling debris.
building mostly fall straight down in a controlled demolition … but if I plane went and flew into the side it could easily just topple sideways
13,516,380 viewer , but only 26,012 subscribe , -.-
The amount of viewers has nothing to do with the amount of subscribers....
yeah
+Aiman Hafeez u hjihftuce3tdttup
product put
jdegipiUpchurch
nurofenisgvgddrtdrffhlz
eiroood4kforkdechuh ghost ybyb h ybyug5tfg6btny
the one word i can say for this video: BEAUTIFUL
7 years ago and stil no good physic in games
Ahem... Just cause 2, red faction guerrilla, NVIDIA FLeX demo, just cause 3, and mercenary 2.
Mercenary 2 was great fun. I think I spent as much time blowing up the buildings as i did playing the actual game.
I think you didn't listened of a game called "Toibash".
hmm. the planks arent conected ..pretty horseshit really
Connected? Why would they be?
logitech4873 Its just a giant jenga tower really. In a real building clumns and beams are connected to each other.
Its still mesmerising though
CockpumpVideo Wtf? It's a KEVA plank tower, what were you expecting?
Do you also look at houses built of cards and go "That's stupid and unrealistic"???
logitech4873 an actual house built from cards would be pretty cool though
CockpumpVideo ł
Satisfying to the max, even without sound.
I have no idea what this video is... but I think I like it.
First I would like to congratulate the computer programmer and mathematician who compiled this programme to simulate all this. Excellent simulation.
This building is made of planks which are unconnected and they rest on each other using gravitational effects. If this was a concrete building with the joints connected to each other the building would have taken much more punishment.
Also this is not a building with rooms, but planks on top of each other without any connection. If more spaces were made to form rooms, they the differential equation would be so much different. May I mention the fact that in this building the planks are so close together that the diagonal effect is not felt. When walls are used and a lot of space is left in between walls and ceilings, well a room of four walls without ceilings will be afffected diagonally as a square without diagonals will oscillate diagonally, A triangular room would not.
So this is indeed a good simulation but does not represent a building which accommodates people. It is a good learning algorithm in preparation for more complex ones.
In countries where earthquakes occur, connected structure is better and it would behave differently. Once I had a problem with a skyscraper that was made with connected vertical and horizontal members and the top storey oscillated dramatically and we had to introduce a few diagonals in the structure to stabilize it. Connected structures are best and they need to have diagonals if possible as relying on the joint will cause a lot od stress on the joints.
That's one sturdy building, as we can see from the first test.
i'm not sure what i just watched but it was appealing to the eye
Oh my, that's quite extraordinary. I heard nothing but good from the Bullet Physics Engine, but this?!
This is the strongest Jenga tower ive seen in a while
Why is it satisfying to see this?
Why is this so relaxing??
One of the first videos i remember watching :)
wow, diese Art von "Spielereien" mit der Physik sind echt super. Dynamics von Cinema war damals vor 5 Jahren das erste was ich gesehen hatte..
Finally, I see this video in my childhood, nostalgia
This video inspired me nearly a decade ago to become an engineer. Wow.
A little KEVA plants the satisfaction in my life
i remember watching this when i was 8, now I'm 18
It’s so real and gets my mind thinking
This is Awesome! Great Work!
Gerard
really amazing, cant even imagine how much hours went into this engine
One guy.
man i remember seeing this a long time ago.. brings me back
Looks like a great model.
Hello Jim sir how have you been?
I remember seeing this And I finnaly found the original first one that I ever watched. I think this was my first video that I ever watched!
I don't even know what this is for but it is just so amusing to watchlol
This sure takes me back.
holy f 14 years and im back, was 6 years old last time i watched this
Finally, nostalgia.
I am the only one who finds this satisfying??? Just me? ok...
i do
Metracrepas ikr
being just CG, that still looks fun to do
This makes me so happy
pretty sweet the structure was stable right up untill the end then the top fell and the whole thing followed
This is a neat idea to build buildings of this nature because the structure will with stand blast of scale . The structure beams will go in to strengthen it self as I can see . The only time that the structure had failed is when all the boards moved and over balance to one side . There are ways to correct this from happening . With steel beams . Then the wood would push back and make the building stronger .
Most satisfying video ever
Can feel the heat from the computer that ran these simulations at my house
I saw this video when I started using TH-cam. back in 2014
I remember thinking bullet physics was a game.
I watched these videos all the time when I was 5 years old.
x2
watching this was SOOOOO satisfying
I think the build would act almost the same but most buildings have defferent sized rooms and are bolted together.
Nice work
This is really sad, I remember seeing this video when I was 7 I am now 13, this brings back so many memories of the good old days when there was this stuff on TH-cam, this may get no likes, but thank you for my childhood
damn same here
freaking amazing animation
I came here to rewatch the childhood video I used to watch!
This could be the basis of a video game in itself. LIKE SUPER SUUUPER BREAK OUT!
A domino builder's worst nightmare. Blocks that Just. Wont. Fall!
so satisfying i watched this back in the day and i dont know why its so satisfying xDDDD