Earthquake analysis in STAAD Pro by IS code

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 เม.ย. 2019
  • In this Video lecture you are able to learn about Seismic analysis of Building in Staad Pro.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In this channel you can learn about online civil engineering softwares. So Please subscribe my channel for more intresting videos.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    To subscribe my channel click on Red Button and also press the Bell icon.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @omgomase84
    @omgomase84 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    As we defined self load while defining EQ parameter, so I think it would not be define again beam member weight, because it will unnecessarily increase seismic weight and thereby hamper the structural output.

  • @engineerashfaque
    @engineerashfaque 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You already considered selfweight which covers beam/ slab/column self weights, then why did you add again beam & slab weight?

  • @jintamolp.y.2230
    @jintamolp.y.2230 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Since member weights are added here whether it is needed to add self weight again in DL option

  • @civilengineering3438
    @civilengineering3438 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir you have applied member load in E.Q analysis to all beam but you have not applied floor load to all plates which you have generated. pl clarify only we have to generate the floor load not applied to its plate elemets?

  • @ManojKumar-wp3bx
    @ManojKumar-wp3bx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    We consider the floor load 3.5 kn..while slab dead load already takes and assigned in self weight ..so we should take only 1 to 1.5 kn floor load that is its finishing load..m i right sir

  • @nikolastheologou7081
    @nikolastheologou7081 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot for your video!
    Why Did you reduce the damping ratio from 5 to 0.05? The five in the beginning did not meant five percent?

    • @civilengineeringbyshravan9596
      @civilengineeringbyshravan9596  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      If we are not consider 0.05 it will show you error message as damping ratio limit exceeding

    • @pujajha9976
      @pujajha9976 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/dqLW2JAQ8DY/w-d-xo.html

  • @dr.rajeevanb3471
    @dr.rajeevanb3471 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think you need not add weight of beam as member weight. That will be already calculated by the self weight option. The member weight is for including the partition loads. Right?

  • @ManojKumar-wp3bx
    @ManojKumar-wp3bx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    We take uni load 2.5 kn and assigned for beam ...while dead load already taken..why in seismic load we again assigned it..kindly clear

  • @omgomase84
    @omgomase84 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please make a correction while defining a floor weights pressure=(DL+0.25/0.5 LL) kN/m2. here DL=Self weight of slab+superimposed DL.

  • @sugatmohod6416
    @sugatmohod6416 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    brother do you have something on " Seismic Analysis of Silo"

  • @Souvik62674
    @Souvik62674 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do you add member weight and floor weight ??

  • @shaiksharmila5466
    @shaiksharmila5466 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @Sir i got 2 errors by following u r video how can i rectify the errors

  • @rahimsafi6275
    @rahimsafi6275 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    we do not use - sign for load in seismic analysis

  • @PradeepMYeole
    @PradeepMYeole 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good explanation

  • @btb-bengaltrekkerbubun1678
    @btb-bengaltrekkerbubun1678 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are you not considering the weight of the column?

  • @MG-ny1ue
    @MG-ny1ue 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    No need to calculate dead weight of concrete for sismic analysis. It calculates automatically. Instead of calculating dead weight of beam , calculate dead weight of wall resting on beam

  • @sadanandaswamy6918
    @sadanandaswamy6918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It would have been better if you had meshed the slab according to the column spacing.

  • @barnabusgurung5499
    @barnabusgurung5499 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you analysis and design a rcc building of a seismic region

  • @syedmuzaffarihsan1960
    @syedmuzaffarihsan1960 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    After seismic analysis can I directly go to design option for rcc design

    • @pujajha9976
      @pujajha9976 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/dqLW2JAQ8DY/w-d-xo.html

    • @pujajha9976
      @pujajha9976 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/dqLW2JAQ8DY/w-d-xo.html

  • @oscarvaron5024
    @oscarvaron5024 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey my friend ¿dimensions of columns and beams in concrete material?meter

  • @faizanuddin9272
    @faizanuddin9272 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Sir seismic load is consider positive?

    • @civilengineeringbyshravan9596
      @civilengineeringbyshravan9596  4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I was considered EQx case only you can take EQy also by considering another load case

  • @manisingla3860
    @manisingla3860 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sir mere softwere m sesimic load define nhi ho rha, creation failed ara h ,,,any solution

    • @civilengineeringbyshravan9596
      @civilengineeringbyshravan9596  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which version u r using ?

    • @manisingla3860
      @manisingla3860 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@civilengineeringbyshravan9596 V8i ss6 version....please suggest....

    • @pujajha9976
      @pujajha9976 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/dqLW2JAQ8DY/w-d-xo.html

    • @pujajha9976
      @pujajha9976 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@manisingla3860 th-cam.com/video/dqLW2JAQ8DY/w-d-xo.html

  • @puneetgosain3922
    @puneetgosain3922 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir, What is Damping ratio?

    • @puneetgosain3922
      @puneetgosain3922 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I want to ask how you choose the damping ratio( .05) is it depend on type of material

    • @civilengineeringbyshravan9596
      @civilengineeringbyshravan9596  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Damping is a phenomenon that makes any vibrating body/structure to decay in amplitude of motion gradually by means of energy dissipation through various mechanisms. For the building generally we will assume 5% vibrations

    • @puneetgosain3922
      @puneetgosain3922 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@civilengineeringbyshravan9596 ok sir

  • @yogeshprajapati3319
    @yogeshprajapati3319 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Error 1893 load cases must be defined before any other load case ....what is the solutio

  • @jnaneswara4512
    @jnaneswara4512 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    BRO CREATION FAILED IS COMING AFTER CLICKING GENERATE BUTTON