Jesus as God - A Philosophical Inquiry | Episode 1909 | Closer To Truth

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
  • Why the astonishing claim that Jesus is God? Not like God. Not representing God. But literally God? One need not be a Christian, or even a theist, to appreciate the arguments. Featuring interviews with Sarah Coakley, N.T. Wright, Oliver Crisp, Eleonore Stump, C. Stephen Evans, and Ian McFarland.
    Season 19, Episode 9 - #CloserToTruth
    ▶Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/2GXmFsP
    Closer To Truth host Robert Lawrence Kuhn takes viewers on an intriguing global journey into cutting-edge labs, magnificent libraries, hidden gardens, and revered sanctuaries in order to discover state-of-the-art ideas and make them real and relevant.
    ▶Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
    Closer to Truth presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.
    #JesusAsGod #Philosophy

ความคิดเห็น • 1.4K

  • @CloserToTruthTV
    @CloserToTruthTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    If you enjoyed this episode, give our excellent contributors a thumbs up! If you'd like to further explore the cosmos, consciousness, and meaning, please consider becoming a subscriber. For more episodes from Season 19, see our Season 19 playlist: bit.ly/38ZCxq9

    • @DrumminDoc
      @DrumminDoc 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Subscribed purely bc I enjoyed watching these theologians and philosophers squirm thru the whole video.

    • @colingeorgejenkins2885
      @colingeorgejenkins2885 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why does he not realise that gesus was the order and the devil is the chaos.

    • @colingeorgejenkins2885
      @colingeorgejenkins2885 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Christian trinity? U in the past U in the present and you in the future

    • @colingeorgejenkins2885
      @colingeorgejenkins2885 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      To complete the quadernity U The gift of fining the three

    • @rizwanrafeek3811
      @rizwanrafeek3811 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Closer to Truth
      If Jesus was God in flesh, then Hinduism also holds a valid claim, that their holy-men were God in flesh on Earth.
      God becoming a man, is an imperfect God.
      OT says, God is not a man in the book of Numbers.
      Now imagine God-man ate food, used toilet, went to bed, then woke up with morning erection, and then God-man get occasional self discharge otherwise known as wet-dreams among men on Earth.
      First and second commandments of God, went down the drain, if Jesus was "God" in flesh.
      Thank God, I am a Muslim.

  • @skyeridge2020
    @skyeridge2020 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I do have a question for you, Dr. Kuhn. Can you identify any significant changes in your view of reality due to your contact with so many experts? I wonder.... Thank you again for this great program. I learn so much!!

  • @Γ.Σ-ψ1ζ
    @Γ.Σ-ψ1ζ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Sir Robert, you are truly an exquisite man. You are the perfect embodiment of curious yet tasteful skepticism and intellectual virtue. I love how you can entertain something you cannot grasp, without letting your desire for knowledge tarnish your intellectual standards, and at the same time how your standards don't render you non-receptive to the possibility that there may exist aspects of reality that can be reached by transcending these standards.

    • @skyeridge2020
      @skyeridge2020 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Indeed. Well said. He is a model for how all of us should approach life. Open to anything, walled in by nothing, yet insistent on a measure of coherence. (I say "a measure" of coherence, because God would transcend our coherent categories of thinking, yet would not be irrational, though likely suprarational).

  • @liemchot6522
    @liemchot6522 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Love this man's curiosity

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
      RSV
      Only-monos
      God-theos
      Monos theos
      Monotheism
      The Father
      Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)!
      Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has ab God!
      Jesus has a God!
      Jesus died!
      God can’t die!
      God raised Jesus from the dead!
      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21

    • @b.g.5869
      @b.g.5869 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      More than his moustache?

    • @liemchot6522
      @liemchot6522 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@b.g.5869 ooo, that's a tough choice 🤭😬

    • @kimjongun5172
      @kimjongun5172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mitchellc4 ugh shutup

    • @snowdog87
      @snowdog87 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I do to but i am coming to the point where his questions and choice of answerers become self-reinforcing He is always going to Cambridge and Harvard and various places in the west.
      Sometimes i think this is just about keeping his gig going Go east Robert See what you might find there Maybe there is no answer...only silence

  • @ibmor7674
    @ibmor7674 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I wanted Robert to press the guests a little harder.

    • @napoleonb55
      @napoleonb55 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The end game would all have been the same. Faith

    • @curtcoller3632
      @curtcoller3632 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well - then you would have to replace Robert with me. And would not have that position for long.

    • @b.g.5869
      @b.g.5869 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      His intention isn't to debate people. He wants to present different perspectives.
      Also, he's been doing this off and on for over 20 years with just a few years off air in the mid 2000s, and for most of that time had pretty much gone over the same handful of topics, often with the very same people, multiple times, which gets very repetitive. I think he wanted to try something different.

    • @samysantarella8287
      @samysantarella8287 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And how would you press each of them further?

    • @bobs4429
      @bobs4429 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree that RLK's intention was not to debate. Instead I imagine his intent was to let each person take his/her best shot at explaining beliefs about Jesus -- and then let us the viewers judge for ourselves. I imagine this because more than just about any other topic he has covered there is absolutely no empirical evidence to support any position so it's all "poetry" as N.T. Wright observes.

  • @rg5886
    @rg5886 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I think what I've learned the most from this series is an effective way to approach curiosity and inquiry.

    • @sidrar5528
      @sidrar5528 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That’s a great thing to learn from this series! The host never really strays from his position right at the place where you consider the most unknowable unknowns lol. If you watch enough, you can see that he’s really really sharing his personal journey with the audience, and there’s nuance to his conclusions.

    • @sweebos
      @sweebos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's beautiful honestly. 🙂

  • @beejaybertelsen
    @beejaybertelsen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As a young 20 year old student of history of religion at Lund university I had an aha-moment after speaking to one of the teachers privately about his beliefs. I came to realize that a person can be extraordinarily intelligent and extraordinarily learned and still believe in anything, even the most absurd. Now at 70, I sadly haven't experienced anything to make me change my mind. It seems that a persons religious beliefs are rooted in factors totally irrational.

    • @tongakhan230
      @tongakhan230 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For reasons best known to God, he hides the knowledge of the truth from worldly scholars and intellectuals.
      Jesus in prayer to God says:
      Matthew 11:25 At that time Jesus said in response: “I publicly praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have HIDDEN these things from the wise and intellectual ones and have revealed them to young children.
      Thus, if someone wants to learn the truth, there must be humility and a desire to learn.
      God has a people whom he is gathering from all religions to be survivors of the destruction he is to bring to end this wicked system. He promised this through his prophet at Micah 4:1-5. They have a book explaining the basic truths found in the bible. Here is the free download link.
      www.jw.org/en/library/books/?contentLanguageFilter=en&pubFilter=bh&sortBy=1
      I hope this helps.

    • @bonesaw6601
      @bonesaw6601 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I totally agree with you.

    • @Tokisamright
      @Tokisamright หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes , that baffles me, how can people be so learned and intelligent yet so foolhardy when it comes to things like religion

  • @JudeOne3Four
    @JudeOne3Four 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The concept of the Trinity is blatantly pagan. It began in Ancient Babylon and made its way throughout the world. It can be found in the history of most ancient civilizations. The reason that Philo of Alexandria is cited as the one that brought us the Trinity, is for his direct involvement with mixing Greek philosophy with the Holy Scriptures.

    • @deanodebo
      @deanodebo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Huh? It’s in the Bible for everyone to see

    • @JudeOne3Four
      @JudeOne3Four 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@deanodebo Remember when the Isrealites were in captivity in Egypt and Babylon? Well there is where they've learned the 3 in 1 concept. Read how Stephen in Acts 7 blasted them for always resisting the Holy Spirit as their ancestors did. And they killed him for telling the truth.
      You'll understand why Jesus calls them of the Synagogue of Satan and why Jesus said Beware of the teachings of the Pharisees and Saduccees. And what are they teaching? Babylonian mysticism they call the Kabbalah. That's why their book is called the Babylonian Talmud. The Supernal Triad of the Kabbalah is the foundation of the blasphemous Trinity doctrine and not the Bible.
      The Bible teaches ONE GOD (Spirit) and ONE LORD (Jesus/human) 1 Cor 8:6.

    • @deanodebo
      @deanodebo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JudeOne3Four do you deny 1 John, which clearly and plainly says they are one?

  • @jameszarafonetis9011
    @jameszarafonetis9011 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Start with NDE. Most people who experience what ensues recognize that God is all of consciousness. We all have a spirit which is connected. Those who come back are charged with the mission to love, forgive and help. We all have a spirit which is filtered through the physical brain. Our spirit is a part of the overall collection of spirit. We are here to experience life. We go back when our body expires to come back again to experience and learn more. God sends NDEers to spread love and faith. Jesus was sent down with that purpose.

  • @SomeofThisSomeofThat
    @SomeofThisSomeofThat ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The amount of gymnastics a person will do to prove their world view instead of changing their mind based on evidence

    • @sv6k0a39
      @sv6k0a39 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah it seems pretty clear Jesus was not God or the 2nd part of the trinity. These were all inventions of humans to deify Jesus.

    • @tcl5853
      @tcl5853 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What evidence are you talking about?

  • @theresebrandser
    @theresebrandser 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We are all a piece of God. We are God’s personal experience as you. ❤️

    • @michaelguzman7363
      @michaelguzman7363 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Your comment is about as close to the concept of God that I have been able to entertain. Although I have also wondered, if this were true, God must either experience being really lonely, bored (?) or could it be that God had nothing else more important at the moment to do than divide himself up into each human being in order to experience (justify?) himself from the point of view of individual, free willed (?) beings that he himself created (does that make sense ?). I DO feel very much like RLK, an insatiatiable urge to know, study, ponder, and continue searching for (the) truth.

  • @prestonpittman717
    @prestonpittman717 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I was trying to imagine the very face of God,
    What happened instead was really quite odd!
    Each time I looked to see His face,
    Images appeared from the human race.
    I saw the face of a Doctor as he stopped to stare,
    unable to find the cancer he knew was there.
    I saw the hands of a Mother reaching her child,
    a Park Ranger's smile as a cub is released back into the wild.
    I saw the peace in the face of a man who was blind,.
    giving directions to a place someone couldn't find.
    I looked for the face of my dear Lord,
    and saw the faces of so many in one accord.
    But still, it was His face, I longed to see,
    and was given one final image,... a picture of me!

  • @n8thal718
    @n8thal718 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Some people's CHOICE OF (QUESTIONS)
    leads them down the wrong path and away from the answer they don't understand yet.

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
      RSV
      Only-monos
      God-theos
      Monos theos
      Monotheism
      The Father
      Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)!
      Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has ab God!
      Jesus has a God!
      Jesus died!
      God can’t die!
      God raised Jesus from the dead!
      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21

  • @ElkoJohn
    @ElkoJohn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Jesus referred to himself as the ''Son of Man'' - which is found 82 times in the New Testament. The title ''Son of Man'' is used 93 times in the Book of Ezekiel.
    The Son of Man in Ezekiel has many parallels to the Son of Man in the New Testament.

    • @asielnorton345
      @asielnorton345 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the arian heresy which stated that Jesus and God were separate was extremely popular in the early Christian movement. it seems to me likely that the early church decided, realized that paradox, mystery is more accurate (in their view) and emotionally, poetically powerful. it's also good to think about Plato and Plotinus. In the platonic view the one (which is beyond human conception) overflows into Intelligence. Intelligence overflows into existence. Existence (spirit) overflows into duality. Duality overflows into material reality. So in essence everything is the one. The one (the good) overflows like a fountain into everything. Both creates and is. But everything is still itself.

    • @henrysantiago5997
      @henrysantiago5997 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@asielnorton345 I dont believe that JohnE subscribes to Arianism. "Son of God" is a Jewish reference to Angels in the old testament.

  • @IronFreee
    @IronFreee ปีที่แล้ว +6

    When she said "it involves a certain analytical sophistication", I think she meant a great amount of irrational thinking... until you end up just ignoring it.

  • @algie-t2w
    @algie-t2w 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The question of Jesus as Son of God, I get the feeling that Lawrence isn't convinced for a moment.
    I get the feeling that when he is listening here to Christians he is thinking to himself "This is crazy talk".

  • @bonesaw6601
    @bonesaw6601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We are one messed up confused species.

  • @semigloss
    @semigloss 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    6:49 “This is where it becomes very mind-bending…” Yeah, the preceding four minutes of mental gymnastics explaining the Trinity were super straight-forward…

  • @hosermandeusl2468
    @hosermandeusl2468 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    It amazes me the skill with which theologians tap dance better than Richard Gere in Chicago.

    • @bwizzle4194
      @bwizzle4194 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      She's just explaining her faith dude sounds out-winded. I try get it though and, no need to discredit because honestly no one knows.

    • @saratonnan
      @saratonnan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol. Was just thinking it's a lot of double-talk mumbo jumbo conjecture twisted to fit what they want to believe.

    • @scientiaetveritas40
      @scientiaetveritas40 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have never met an honest theologian. Because the ones who are intellectually honest are no longer theologians.

    • @samysantarella8287
      @samysantarella8287 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I guess theology is like tap dancing, then: only some people can understand it, even less people have the skill to do it. The rest of us can either learn to appreciate and enjoy it and do it, or ignore and be ignorant of the phenomenon.

    • @ggstylz
      @ggstylz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂

  • @nickxidis9571
    @nickxidis9571 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I appreciate your thoughtful approach. Dr.’s Teryl and Fiona Givens might have a unique perspective that contributes to the discussion.

  • @gracerodgers8952
    @gracerodgers8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Unique episode. Ask God to know the truth that He wants you to know, even if it's hard to accept, just so it's the truth.

    • @iamfilleg
      @iamfilleg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Doesn’t that argument seem fallacious to you?

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I like to imagine what Jesus was like as a schoolboy.
    In kindergarten, the teachers must have noticed that he was extraordinarily bright.
    In science, he completely understood quantum mechanics and harmonised it with relativity.
    In mathematics class, he solved all the differential equations in no time at all.
    In biology, his essay on the Origin of Species was simply magical.
    His attendance record, of course, was 110% because of his omnipresence.
    Some people didn't like his omniscience. He was, after all, a bit of a know-all.
    He didn't bath very often, but his blonde hair and omnipotence made him very popular with the girls.
    But oddly, he preferred the company of boys and this preference stayed with him all his lice.
    He was very good at sports and enjoyed some board games, but didn't see any point in playing dice.

    • @vecumex9466
      @vecumex9466 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually no he wasn't perhaps a human being with a lot of limitations but it is precisely at that juncture that the substance of God is/was revealed to human beings. Humility and faithfulness at the very core of existence.

    • @tedgrant2
      @tedgrant2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@vecumex9466
      Jesus knew everything and he could do anything.
      He knew how to operate heavy machinery and solve crossword puzzles.
      In his spare time he liked to translate French literature into Esperanto.

    • @tedgrant2
      @tedgrant2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@vecumex9466
      While Jesus was still in diapers, his hobby was building model helicopters.
      As there were no batteries available in the shops, he powered them by solar panels.
      Sadly, his brilliant lectures fell on deaf ears.

  • @ingridbeatrizariaskropff7292
    @ingridbeatrizariaskropff7292 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    If you follow Jesus , you will be closer to truth , closer to God .

    • @scientiaetveritas40
      @scientiaetveritas40 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, just ask Josh Duggar! But better do it soon - he's going away for 20 years.....

    • @nadiraltahawy6279
      @nadiraltahawy6279 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Following Jesus as a good man to lead you to God 👌.
      But considering Jesus himself God is the worst way to be closer to God.

    • @nadiraltahawy6279
      @nadiraltahawy6279 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Eonian Sage At his best

  • @musicbyfriendsforfriends3311
    @musicbyfriendsforfriends3311 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I seem to remember Kurt Vonnegut characterizing himself as “a Christ-Worshiping Atheist”. This video brings clarity to this view that may ultimately provide the key to this problem of Christ’s nature. One can suspend belief in a cosmological supreme being and approach the transcendent through a relationship with someone totally human. Nicely presented, Dr. Kuhn, and thank you for your rigorous skepticism.

    • @mcosu1
      @mcosu1 ปีที่แล้ว

      I love Vonnegut, one of many great "Christian atheists"

  • @StreetsOfVancouverChannel
    @StreetsOfVancouverChannel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Technically, Jesus of Nazareth was never a "Christian". He apparently was born, raised as and died as a Jew. it's also interesting that other than scribbling in the sand/dirt with a stick on one occasion that he never actually wrote anything by his own hand. Equally fascinating is that he almost certainly spoke in the common tongue of Aramaic (or even Hebrew though the evidence is less convincing historically) and would have been able to incorporate via Hebraic mnemonic storytelling devices to those whom he spoke to and interacted with.
    Those writings referred to as the New Testament were all written in a form of Greek from the Common Era. Greek was the common/shared language of the Roman Empire so that makes sense to some degree. The New Testament documents would have technically been accessible to a wider audience geographically as this 'fringe' Jewish sect eventually branched into its own religious movement perhaps sometime between around 70 C.E. and by 125 C.E. that was called Christianity.
    It's also telling that a rabbinic teacher known as Saul of Tarsus became Paul of Tarsus following his own 'mystical/saturated phenomenon' experience with this apparently resurrected Jesus of Nazareth (who had been functionally executed as an 'enemy of the Roman state' via crucifixion). Paul of Tarsus (a former agitator of this small Jewish sect and a Hellenistic Jew himself) ended up becoming the largest single authorial contributor to the New Testament. He literally shaped much of this early Jewish sect and his Hellenistic rabbinic education would have influenced his style and semantic concepts/choices and philosophical rumination. That obviously impacted what he reflected upon regarding this resurrected 'divine' human being as he composed his primarily incidental letters and correspondence. Paul's letters helped give transitional shape, context and hermeneutical reflexivity to this branched-out group whom we call Christians.

    • @kristenhansen1843
      @kristenhansen1843 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jesus was not 'of Nazereth'. The inscription INRI refers to Jesus the Nazirite, (King of the Jews). Nazirites were a sect of the Essenes, the sect responsible for collecting tithes, and went around as a well armed gang. Judas Iscariot was Jesus' bodyguard and best friend.

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
      RSV
      Only-monos
      God-theos
      Monos theos
      Monotheism
      The Father
      Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)!
      Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has ab God!
      Jesus has a God!
      Jesus died!
      God can’t die!
      God raised Jesus from the dead!
      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21

    • @kingsandassociates7176
      @kingsandassociates7176 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mitchellc4 the point of the dirt writing was to re-affirm the way in which God relates to life....that is through 'writing directly in the dirt'. We are obviously the dirt....in fact, everything is dirt.

    • @abelipson9040
      @abelipson9040 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Streets of Vancouver... There are multiple religions in the world... some just broke away and started started their own

    • @nonprogrediestregredi1711
      @nonprogrediestregredi1711 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The story of the woman taken in adultery from the gospel of "John" in which Jesus writes in the dirt does not even show up in the text until the fourth century. It's an interpolation and almost certainly is not historically accurate.

  • @maxsterling8203
    @maxsterling8203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m relieved for the moment that I am drawn near to the Creator while I spectate the nature I share with other fellow humans of faith. I believe to let yourself be known first and live your life by way of the son to bring others with you as we all love each other in our love for the father. This was contrary to Dr Kuhn final comment in this video. Would anyone like to assist with this preoccupation?

  • @robertrowland3750
    @robertrowland3750 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    There are no definitive, unassailable answers to metaphysical questions; it's all a mystery. Maybe death is simply the end or maybe death reveals all.

    • @gerhitchman
      @gerhitchman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or maybe metaphysical questions are just bad questions

    • @robertrowland3750
      @robertrowland3750 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@gerhitchman Said like a true reductionist. May I remind you, many of the greatest minds in history have wondered honestly at things metaphysical. I wish you well.

    • @gerhitchman
      @gerhitchman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@robertrowland3750 Yes, and may I remind you, that there has been no progress on metaphysical questions for over 2000 years

    • @robertrowland3750
      @robertrowland3750 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@gerhitchman Not just for over 2,000 years my friend but as far back as mankind goes. It's the very nature of metaphysics that it's transcendental and so, beyond knowing; and though destined to remain unverifiable, it has always and continues to engender profound questions. Therein lies the rub.

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
      RSV
      Only-monos
      God-theos
      Monos theos
      Monotheism
      The Father
      Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)!
      Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has ab God!
      Jesus has a God!
      Jesus died!
      God can’t die!
      God raised Jesus from the dead!
      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21

  • @cspiritlove4564
    @cspiritlove4564 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Our soul/consciousness can over ride our body's instinct reactions at times. We can experience both at the same time. Fear and bravery (with purpose) at the same time for example .With fear your instinct tells you to run but at the same time your experiencing that you know you have a goal to achieve that may affect a desired future outcome like winning a war requiring you to set aside that fear and be brave to play your part.. When we sacrifice ourselves for others you experience things like this. Those fork in the road moments where your higher consciousness is able to over ride something as powerful as natural instinct to survive.

  • @AlexanderR879
    @AlexanderR879 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love listening to people today talk about things that almost for sure didn’t happen 2000 years ago like they know exactly what happened and why it happened.

  • @guitarfreekin
    @guitarfreekin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love these series. But I see a flaw in them. The uneven leaning towards skepticism as the best tool to ascertain truth. I see another issue here. When you try to grasp something as banal as consciousness, we end up confused and dumbfounded. Now if you think you could define the Infinite One in a test tube and give two examples of Him, then we are bound to mystified and dumbfounded. The very basis of Worship is being mystified and dumbfounded. I would rather see that there is humility and room for mystery. After all if we can figure out infinity, then our minds must be bigger than infinity. Therefore we must be gods, we are not and our minds are finite. We cannot define nothing, much less God so I would leave room for mystery and faith here Dr Kuhn.

    • @georgedoyle2487
      @georgedoyle2487 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      “Leave room for mystery”
      Well said!! I’m not making any appeals to authority but according to the literary genius G.K. Chesterton….
      “Mysticism keeps men sane. As long as you have mystery you have health; when you destroy mystery you create morbidity. The ordinary man has always been sane because the ordinary man has always been a mystic.” (G.K.Chesterton).
      Furthermore, a community of hundreds of people meet in a church every Sunday in London they sing songs and listen to guest speakers. Sometimes it feels like a stand up comedy show if the speaker has funny anecdotes and is also in touch with every day ordinary people including the absurdity and joy of life.
      During the service the congregation bow their heads and contemplate the (mystery) and miracle of life for a few minutes. A member of the congregation gives a poignant testimony about how his mothers life and death influenced his spiritual journey. During these services they discuss the importance of wisdom, knowledge and volunteering. But this (Sunday assemblies) are no ordinary church service as they are all atheists or describe themselves as “unreligious”.
      They even chat over tea, coffee and biscuits afterwards as it creates a sense of community spirit and human connectedness. What a brilliant service to the community and what a brilliant format and idea. I wonder where they got that idea from!???
      Sounds very ironic and pretty (mystical) and actually quite wholesome and beautiful and all (mystics) are on equal footing under relativism!!
      “I think that you cannot eliminate religion from the psyche of mankind. If you suppress it in one form, it merely emerges in another form. Even if you don't believe in God, you still have to believe in something that gives meaning to your life, and shapes your sense of the world. Such a belief is religious.” (Michael Crichton). .

    • @georgedoyle2487
      @georgedoyle2487 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      “It is exactly this balance of apparent contradictions that has been the whole buoyancy of the healthy man. The whole secret of (mysticism) is this: that man can understand everything by the help of what he does not understand. The morbid logician seeks to make everything lucid, and succeeds in making everything mysterious. The mystic allows one thing to be mysterious, and everything else becomes lucid. The determinist makes the theory of causation quite clear, and then finds that he cannot say "if you please" to the housemaid. The Christian permits free will to remain a sacred mystery; but because of this his relations with the housemaid become of a sparkling and crystal clearness. He puts the seed of dogma in a central darkness; but it branches forth in all directions with abounding natural health. As we have taken the circle as the symbol of reason and madness, we may very well take the cross as the symbol at once of mystery and of health. Buddhism is centripetal, but Christianity is centrifugal: it breaks out. For the circle is perfect and infinite in its nature; but it is fixed for ever in its size; it can never be larger or smaller. But the cross, though it has at its heart a collision and a contradiction, can extend its four arms for ever without altering its shape. Because it has a paradox in its centre it can grow without changing. The circle returns upon itself and is bound. The cross opens its arms to the four winds; it is a signpost for free travellers.
      Symbols alone are of even a cloudy value in speaking of this deep matter; and another symbol from physical nature will express sufficiently well the real place of mysticism before mankind. The one created thing which we cannot look at is the one thing in the light of which we look at everything -- Like the sun at noonday, mysticism explains everything else by the blaze of its own victorious invisibility -- Detached intellectualism is (in the exact sense of a popular phrase) all moonshine; for it is light without heat, and it is secondary light, reflected from a dead world. But the Greeks were right when they made Apollo the god both of imagination and of sanity; for he was both the patron of poetry and the patron of healing. Of necessary dogmas and a special creed I shall speak later. But that transcendentalism by which all men live has primarily much the position of the sun in the sky. We are conscious of it as of a kind of splendid confusion; it is something both shining and shapeless, at once a blaze and a blur. But the circle of the moon is as clear and unmistakable, as recurrent and inevitable, as the circle of Euclid on a blackboard. For the moon is utterly reasonable; and the moon is the mother of lunatics and has given to them all her name.” (G.K. Chesterton).
      “At this moment it seems as though science will never be able to raise the curtain on the mystery of creation. For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.”
      All the best to you and your family and keep safe.

  • @jakobbogale2350
    @jakobbogale2350 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    You came so close to the Truth in this video you could have almost touched him.

    • @philo3838
      @philo3838 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's a pagan belief

    • @josegaleano1530
      @josegaleano1530 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He is a true lier you belive that crap the guy is ignorant of knowledge with no prove at all to stand his teaching ideas

    • @jude.niranjan
      @jude.niranjan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      THIS CLOSE TO TRUTH 👌

    • @yourkingdomcomeyourwillbedone
      @yourkingdomcomeyourwillbedone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      2 Timothy 3:7

    • @miguelatkinson
      @miguelatkinson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jakobbogale2350 yes because a video discussing an inherently contradictory concept is getting closer to the truth and also you can't touch something that isn't physically there

  • @bl2819
    @bl2819 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Suffering...Science made my life easier and I don’t say that lightly. With all the discoveries in medicine I can have a longer life than my ancestors. But there is another suffering that seems to be the elephant in the room in the west, like death or getting older or what do you do when you get jealous or angry...what do you do when you lose (in any situation) or go through a tragedy, and what about the suffering of others? Jesus suffered, He put suffering in the forefront and then was able to transcendent it. What does all this mean? I don’t know but it makes me feel less lonely when I suffer. (Of course you can think about suffering without Jesus). So I wonder if looking for Truth is the right word. I think meaning is more appropriate when you think about God.

    • @ThomasPanto
      @ThomasPanto 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Would slaves only build pyramids if they were paid or treatened with "hell"? or would Life care for the life we LOVE wheather we were paid or not ?

    • @itneeds2bsaid528
      @itneeds2bsaid528 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's what the story of Jesus was all about. Life IS suffering. Breathe that truth in. Accept it. There is no changing it. To live is to suffer. Quit trying to make your life not suck, it can't happen. Instead, do whatever you can to make other's lives suck less. Interestingly, (yet not surprisingly) psychological studies show us that this attitude towards life produce the most fulfillment and satisfaction. Like our brains and souls know the only justification for going through this life of pain, tragedy, pessimism, and unquenchable thirsts every day is that maybe we did some good.
      Also, remember to keep an eternal perspective. You will exist forever. Ten thousand years from now, the tragedies of your short time on Earth will be as forgotten and forgivable as that kid who pushed you off the swing in 3rd grade.

    • @bobs4429
      @bobs4429 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think most folks use the word "suffering" to refer to two different but related things. The first is physical suffering -- a.k.a. pain. For example, one suffers with diabetes. The second is emotional suffering, as in suffering the loss of a loved one. If you see these separately then yes, there will always be pain. But there does not have to be suffering. The Buddha showed us how to do this over 2500 years ago.

    • @70AD-user45
      @70AD-user45 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@itneeds2bsaid528
      Yes, it's all about suffering (in this life) and like Jesus, the "suffering servant" who came to earth, we are also expected to suffer....."take up thy cross and follow me", Jesus said. So suffering is all part of this life.

  • @mrloop1530
    @mrloop1530 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The whole notion of a god in this world filled with the suffering of innocent children is the perfection of narcissism and nothing else. Also, it is just such a strange claim - why would there be a god, and why exactly one? Why not just grow up?

    • @LameBushido
      @LameBushido 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      What if god doesn't care about the suffering of innocent children? What if he's indifferent to our suffering?

    • @mrloop1530
      @mrloop1530 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LameBushido Yes then what?

    • @bipolarbear9917
      @bipolarbear9917 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      “Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
      Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
      Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
      Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
      - Epicurus (341-270 BCE)
      Jesus probably did exist, and was someone like Mohandis (Mahatma) Gandhi. A living breathing human being, who was willing to sacrifice his own life to teach others a moral way to live and love one another. Was he the 'Son of God?' No. God or the Cosmos is beyond our total comprehension. What ever created the Multiverse if a what or who is necessary, is far removed from anything human. We just happen to be lucky enough to have been born of this Universe that can support sentient life.
      Modern Pantheism makes more sense than some ancient 'Old Man in the Sky' legend. There is no Heaven or Hell, only the reality of constantly recycling Universes in the infinite possibilities of the Multiverse; a beginning without end, an end without a beginning, like an M.C.Escher drawing; and infinity with edges that goes on forever.
      Is there a difference between good and evil? Maybe... it's probably just the choice of our reasonably intelligent and sentient mind in regards to sustainability of life itself. No need for an orthodox God of the plethora of religions and belief systems, just the Universe itself. So, get used to it. We are the masters of our own destiny. No one's going to rescue us. We must save ourselves. The sooner we realize that the better.
      There are no races of human beings. 'We are Earthlings; just one family of the human species that originally all came out of Africa, that are living on a tiny insignificant planet, orbiting an average star, lost in an ordinary galaxy, in a tiny forgotten part of the Universe, in a multitude of Multiverses. The Cosmos is all that is, or was, or ever will be'. Are we sentient human beings special? Yes, of course. 'Our ancestors worshiped the Sun, and were not foolish, because it makes sense to revere the Sun and stars, for we are their children... We are a way for the Cosmos to know itself' - Carl Sagan.

  • @matrix268
    @matrix268 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rationalization is anathema to finding GOD. Receptivity, and possibly the right hemisphere makes the connection

    • @tshepoblom716
      @tshepoblom716 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is it not God who gave the power of rationalisation?

  • @davidyoung1164
    @davidyoung1164 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    "Let there be light" is Man's consciousness wanting to know. Our finding out is the creating process, and our final knowing is seeing the Creation as in a mirror, as our own body. Plato said something similar, and Christianity, with eyes on both traditions, and having seen such knowing in the man Jesus--loving the whole as his own body--saw the same brilliant light. It was necessarily introduced through ego-friendly mysteries--the truth is no friend to the ego--so alas, and of course they did, the mysteries very quickly became the final word, and the deeper truth--heresy.
    Hegel and others more or less reasoned out the same thing over 200 years ago, and the Church said, and of course it did: "Turn that light off!"
    It's simple really, and as Paul said, everyone knows it: Jesus is, and you and I can be God because God is Love. We long for God in that we long for the all-encompassing and eternal union that is love.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      the trouble with you creatures is that you use words or symbols without having any idea what you mean by them or seek to convey when you use them

    • @davidyoung1164
      @davidyoung1164 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@vhawk1951kl If that's directed towards me, tell me more. Show me the light.

    • @jameszarafonetis9011
      @jameszarafonetis9011 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Amen.

    • @jameszarafonetis9011
      @jameszarafonetis9011 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right on.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidyoung1164 iIf the cap fits...

  • @Jack-hu2do
    @Jack-hu2do ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A fascinating episode. However, it might have been clearer if those interviewed had mentioned this one fact: Prior to the Word becoming flesh (human), God had already created humanity in his image and likeness. While we are not omnipotent or omniscient, there is some kind of one-to-one correspondence between us and our Creator that made the incarnation possible.

    • @todddavidson3192
      @todddavidson3192 ปีที่แล้ว

      Image meaning - Rational, Creative, and having the capacity to love.

  • @garychartrand7378
    @garychartrand7378 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I just don't see that there is any mystery. Jesus Himself said "Have I not said that yea are God's" and "Why are you so amazed? You shall do this and even greater.". When a horse has a baby - it's a horse. When God has children - they are God's. That's hard for people to accept but it doesn't change the fact that you are a child of our Heavenly Father and we are His spirit children first that are using a temporary corporeal body. I love Jesus ( as I love everyone) - He is my brother ( as is everyone) but I have never understood why everyone turns for help from Jesus when you could just ask the Creator of everything ( including Jesus) Himself. Or another way to seek God's help and grace is to simply turn to each other - the children of God - and let Dad have some peace and rest. WE ARE MORE POWERFUL THAN MOST OF US ARE AWARE - ESPECIALLY UNITED.

  • @jimbo33
    @jimbo33 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, thank you RLK for the excellent exploration of the underpinnings of what to me is a consumate mystery. This should be required viewing and discussion for all who call themselves believers in Christianity.

  • @richardcooper4825
    @richardcooper4825 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you very much for producing this video - Brilliant job! Appreciate your objectivity and open mind

  • @JamesWilson-ek7ko
    @JamesWilson-ek7ko ปีที่แล้ว

    A technicality in Christian text and stuff considered mind-bending! You’re not kidding.

  • @perttiheinikko3780
    @perttiheinikko3780 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I know that many Christian believers are a lot more intelligent than me, but still: I just don't get how people can take those bronze/iron age myths so seriously as an explanation of the world or the human condition.

    • @bradwhelan4466
      @bradwhelan4466 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To quote the late Christopher Hitchens, " As long as people are afraid of death, there will always be religion" Or to put it another way, people will suspend all logic and reason for the promise of eternal life.

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
      RSV
      Only-monos
      God-theos
      Monos theos
      Monotheism
      The Father
      Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)!
      Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has ab God!
      Jesus has a God!
      Jesus died!
      God can’t die!
      God raised Jesus from the dead!
      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21

  • @succubedream
    @succubedream ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much , C. Stephen Evans, for the answer that cannot be more "Yes, Jesus is God". Because God is love.

  • @roblovestar9159
    @roblovestar9159 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The best line fragment in this episode is "Think of it as bad science fiction...". "Analytic sophistication" or not, it is ultimately all paradox and mystery cards. And, of course, faith; belief without evidence or good reason. Once you have faith you can believe anything. ANYTHING.

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
      RSV
      Only-monos
      God-theos
      Monos theos
      Monotheism
      The Father
      Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)!
      Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has ab God!
      Jesus has a God!
      Jesus died!
      God can’t die!
      God raised Jesus from the dead!
      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21

    • @arthurwieczorek4894
      @arthurwieczorek4894 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      To have faith is to have faith in faith. All they're arguments are diversionary window dressing.

    • @PrecisionEst
      @PrecisionEst 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      “We are asked by science to believe that the entire universe sprang from nothingness, and at a single point and for no discernible reason. This notion is the limit case for credulity. In other words, if you can believe this, you can believe anything.”

  • @mr88cet
    @mr88cet ปีที่แล้ว

    I plead “engineer” when it comes to contemplating The Trinity. In particular, I think of what an engineering draftsman would call “orthogonal projections”: Visualizing an object from front-, side-, and top-view perspectives.
    The Father is sorta like a top view, The Son is like a side view, and Holy Spirit is like a front view. It’s all one single God, just viewed from different perspectives. That, since we’re incapable of contemplating the whole God all at once.

  • @daithiocinnsealach1982
    @daithiocinnsealach1982 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I have a deep sense that I'm wasting my time with this particular episode. I could be learning stuff that will actually improve my life in some way.

    • @tommyvictorbuch6960
      @tommyvictorbuch6960 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Probably not. If religion is right about something, which it rarely is, it is right by accident.
      There's no value in lies.

    • @TheConqueror009
      @TheConqueror009 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Bob Smith atheism isn't a religion by definition.

    • @toforgetisagem8145
      @toforgetisagem8145 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The more I try to understand it all the more I long to spend my time cleaning my cooker.

  • @n8thal718
    @n8thal718 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Gosple of Thomas buddism and aspects of those whom have used certain hallucinatory material.
    Jesus, with Holy Spirit descending upon him after the baptism was the time/symbol of awareness of oneness.
    Jesus the Christ keeps repeating A
    and answering this question yet the church and people keep failing to connect the dots.

  • @riru363
    @riru363 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Such a nice video.

  • @constructivecritique5191
    @constructivecritique5191 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Knowing is experienced not an understooding. We known the bike by riding the bike not by anylizing the bike properties. We known God the same way and we know Jesus is God the same way. We practice in the holy spirit: love, faith, hope, patience, understanding, self-control, courage. We know God by living life fully. Fully with all your mind, heart, soul, and strength. God is love, so by loving we experience God.

  • @greetingsearthlingsmynamei6393
    @greetingsearthlingsmynamei6393 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Jesus is as close to God as we can ever expect to get.

    • @josegaleano1530
      @josegaleano1530 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Jesus and God does not exist only in your ignorant inmagination

    • @greetingsearthlingsmynamei6393
      @greetingsearthlingsmynamei6393 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@josegaleano1530 Your talking about Him. That means He exists.

    • @curtcoller3632
      @curtcoller3632 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And ... Christopher ... you know that how?

    • @ronaldpool3947
      @ronaldpool3947 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@josegaleano1530 thats an opinion not proof....
      Try to convince us if you really care to seek for truth.....

  • @dennyworthington6641
    @dennyworthington6641 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There may be a fine line between Christian apologists and idiocy, but I haven't found it.

  • @aryansaeed2924
    @aryansaeed2924 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Can you do an episode about God in Islam ?

    • @iam007richie
      @iam007richie 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      or Jesus in Islam. That would be interesting too ;)

  • @stanh24
    @stanh24 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No disrespect intended toward the owner of the channel, but it seems to me some people, perhaps including our host, get caught in a cognitive loop, continually asking existential questions that really don’t have answers. There is, in my opinion, a way out of the loop.
    Personally, I found my way out, and intend to stay out.

    • @michalpetrilak3976
      @michalpetrilak3976 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You could have written directly that they were asking questions that, from the Absolute's point of view, are meaningless. I completely agree with you, you need to get out of the loop, like when a dog wants to catch its own tail, it leads nowhere.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In his prologue, John refer to Jesus as God's word (Logos) in the creation of world / universe / cosmos; which is a different dynamic than Jesus expressing God through humanity for ordinary people daily life.

  • @ibinfo-tube5063
    @ibinfo-tube5063 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👉📣 Seemingly all of different scholars have their own different opinion and explanation and somewhere human beings appearing to be deciding and elaborating what characteristics on what degree should be related with the Jesus while as of in the historic perspective of the Abrahamic religion in the holy Quran the same God is calling Jesus his messenger and the son of Maria ( Mariam ) of course the truth and the reality is their but what is right or wrong nobody can prove but believe on or having a faith...may all knowing Almighty bless the whole of humanity after all everybody is belong to ONE TRUE GOD 🤞

  • @davidsfuntimes9899
    @davidsfuntimes9899 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sarah Coakley suggests that Jesus was the second person of the Trinity.But the Trinity is not in the Bible,(1 John5:7) was a later addition,maybe third or fourth century. So how can you believe in the Trinityto start with?

  • @mohamedaminibrahim7463
    @mohamedaminibrahim7463 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I LOVE YOUR QUESTIONS.AM ALSO A TRUTH SEEKER AND I WILL BE WITH YOU IN FINDING IT.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      those that abuse capital letter emphasise nothing but the hysteria of the abuser.

  • @danien37
    @danien37 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ended with a statement of vanity. A stubborn hindrance of ours.

  • @danielsnyder2288
    @danielsnyder2288 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No Jew believed Jesus was God. None of the Gospels state in any way that Jesus is God. Paul never said Jesus is God. Almost 60 years, 3 generations back then, 1 person, the writer of John, trys to say Jesus is God. Odd, no one but that one writer many years on says Jesus is God. Even John only says it once and indirectly

    • @twitherspoon8954
      @twitherspoon8954 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why wouldn't Jesus' four bothers also be god(s)?

    • @twitherspoon8954
      @twitherspoon8954 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      “I and the Father are one” (John 10:30)

    • @twitherspoon8954
      @twitherspoon8954 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So, Jesus started his own religion by telling his followers that he was literally god and the only way to eternal life is to worship him as god.

  • @publiusovidius7386
    @publiusovidius7386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So sad that these people are still confusing mythological reality with literal reality. ANd that they discuss it with such earnestness. It's like debating the degree to with the return of Persephone to Demeter for part of the year was actually accepted by Demeter. Or whether she is still punishing mankind for the separation. I mean, really.

  • @helenkundrath8321
    @helenkundrath8321 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    NOW YOU GOT IT RIGHT! JESUS IS GOD

    • @CeezGeez
      @CeezGeez 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's Thor!

  • @beautybearswitness
    @beautybearswitness 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    @14:47 Does not this sound like the highest bar or standard for a God worthy of human belief or even consideration !?

  • @oscarbennett9253
    @oscarbennett9253 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mr. Lawrence is remarkable

  • @kazilziya830
    @kazilziya830 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What's so hard about all of these intelligent people just saying , I don't know , but this is what i want to believe.

    • @KM-leons
      @KM-leons 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, the only source they have about Jesus is the Bible but they are not willing to accept what it says but use their own foolish reasons. Pathetic.

  • @ianhall3822
    @ianhall3822 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Matthew 27 verse 46 "And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? " That proves that Jesus was not God. End of story.

    • @oveh.8160
      @oveh.8160 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's 'father' not my God. Which is consitent with the trinity (father, son, holy spirit).

  • @karinteves1412
    @karinteves1412 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    WE ARE ALL CHILDREN OF GOD INCLUDING JESUS.

  • @rdpaik
    @rdpaik 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The way I understand the Trinity is that God is outside of the limits of space-time, so that for God to enter this universe/world and become a limited man, He would need an additional nature (Jesus) to maintain omnipresence (one of His traits, along with omnipotence and omniscience).
    A mythical god like Zeus vacated Olympus to appear on earth, but the true God would be able to remain in His domain (outside of space-time) AND be on Earth AND have both natures commune with each other (thus, Jesus spoke to God even though Jesus was essentially God).
    Jesus eventually left this world and returned to God/himself outside of space-time. The Holy Spirit is that part/nature of God that remained in this world after Jesus left.

  • @kumar7359
    @kumar7359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    After listening to these 'experts', I feel they could have used their literary skills as novelists, journalists or content writers, instead of talking abracadabra.

  • @kenanderson7769
    @kenanderson7769 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How do religious people get to make stuff up.

  • @betford2
    @betford2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Pretzels, anyone?

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
      RSV
      Only-monos
      God-theos
      Monos theos
      Monotheism
      The Father
      Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)!
      Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has ab God!
      Jesus has a God!
      Jesus died!
      God can’t die!
      God raised Jesus from the dead!
      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21

  • @rameezkhawaja9696
    @rameezkhawaja9696 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are all the persons in the trinity Distinct ?
    Can second person of trinity exist without the first person (the Father)? Or can Father exist without the second person?
    Can God existence (and his nature) be contingent on any other thing?
    Is there a clear concept laid down by Jesus (peace be upon him) regarding trinity?
    The careful thoughtfulness about the answers to all those questions is very important !!

  • @easywind4044
    @easywind4044 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Not exactly intuitive!

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
      RSV
      Only-monos
      God-theos
      Monos theos
      Monotheism
      The Father
      Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)!
      Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has ab God!
      Jesus has a God!
      Jesus died!
      God can’t die!
      God raised Jesus from the dead!
      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21

    • @kroneexe
      @kroneexe 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mitchellc4 Shut the fuck up you arrogant prick.

  • @tyamada21
    @tyamada21 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A segment from 'Saved by the Light of the Buddha Within'...
    My new understandings of what many call 'God -The Holy Spirit' - resulting from some of the extraordinary ongoing after-effects relating to my NDE...
    Myoho-Renge-Kyo represents the identity of what some scientists are now referring to as the unified field of consciousnesses. In other words, it’s the essence of all existence and non-existence - the ultimate creative force behind planets, stars, nebulae, people, animals, trees, fish, birds, and all phenomena, manifest or latent. All matter and intelligence are simply waves or ripples manifesting to and from this core source. Consciousness (enlightenment) is itself the actual creator of everything that exists now, ever existed in the past, or will exist in the future - right down to the minutest particles of dust - each being an individual ripple or wave.
    The big difference between chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo and most other conventional prayers is that instead of depending on a ‘middleman’ to connect us to our state of inner enlightenment, we’re able to do it ourselves. That’s because chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo allows us to tap directly into our enlightened state by way of this self-produced sound vibration. ‘Who or What Is God?’ If we compare the concept of God being a separate entity that is forever watching down on us, to the teachings of Nichiren, it makes more sense to me that the true omnipotence, omniscience and omnipresence of what most people perceive to be God, is the fantastic state of enlightenment that exists within each of us. Some say that God is an entity that’s beyond physical matter - I think that the vast amount of information continuously being conveyed via electromagnetic waves in today’s world gives us proof of how an invisible state of God could indeed exist.
    For example, it’s now widely known that specific data relayed by way of electromagnetic waves has the potential to help bring about extraordinary and powerful effects - including an instant global awareness of something or a mass emotional reaction. It’s also common knowledge that these invisible waves can easily be used to detonate a bomb or to enable NASA to control the movements of a robot as far away as the Moon or Mars - none of which is possible without a receiver to decode the information that’s being transmitted. Without the receiver, the data would remain impotent. In a very similar way, we need to have our own ‘receiver’ switched on so that we can activate a clear and precise understanding of our own life, all other life and what everything else in existence is.
    Chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo each day helps us to achieve this because it allows us to reach the core of our enlightenment and keep it switched on. That’s because Myoho-Renge-Kyo represents the identity of what scientists now refer to as the unified field of consciousnesses. To break it down - Myoho represents the Law of manifestation and latency (Nature) and consists of two alternating states. For example, the state of Myo is where everything in life that’s not obvious to us exists - including our stored memories when we’re not thinking about them - our hidden potential and inner emotions whenever they’re dormant - our desires, our fears, our wisdom, happiness, karma - and more importantly, our enlightenment.
    The other state, ho, is where everything in Life exists whenever it becomes evident to us, such as when a thought pops up from within our memory - whenever we experience or express our emotions - or whenever a good or bad cause manifests as an effect from our karma. When anything becomes apparent, it merely means that it’s come out of the state of Myo (dormancy/latency) and into a state of ho (manifestation). It’s the difference between consciousness and unconsciousness, being awake or asleep, or knowing and not knowing.
    The second law - Renge - Ren meaning cause and ge meaning effect, governs and controls the functions of Myoho - these two laws of Myoho and Renge, not only function together simultaneously but also underlies all spiritual and physical existence.
    The final and third part of the tri-combination - Kyo, is the Law that allows Myoho to integrate with Renge - or vice versa. It’s the great, invisible thread of energy that fuses and connects all Life and matter - as well as the past, present and future. It’s also sometimes termed the Universal Law of Communication - perhaps it could even be compared with the string theory that many scientists now suspect exists.
    Just as the cells in our body, our thoughts, feelings and everything else is continually fluctuating within us - all that exists in the world around us and beyond is also in a constant state of flux - constantly controlled by these three fundamental laws. In fact, more things are going back and forth between the two states of Myo and ho in a single moment than it would ever be possible to calculate or describe. And it doesn’t matter how big or small, famous or trivial anything or anyone may appear to be, everything that’s ever existed in the past, exists now or will exist in the future, exists only because of the workings of the Laws ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’ - the basis of the four fundamental forces, and if they didn’t function, neither we nor anything else could go on existing. That’s because all forms of existence, including the seasons, day, night, birth, death and so on, are moving forward in an ongoing flow of continuation - rhythmically reverting back and forth between the two fundamental states of Myo and ho in absolute accordance with Renge - and by way of Kyo. Even stars are dying and being reborn under the workings of what the combination ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’ represents. Nam, or Namu - which mean the same thing, are vibrational passwords or keys that allow us to reach deep into our life and fuse with or become one with ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’.
    On a more personal level, nothing ever happens by chance or coincidence, it’s the causes that we’ve made in our past, or are presently making, that determine how these laws function uniquely in each of our lives - as well as the environment from moment to moment. By facing east, in harmony with the direction that the Earth is spinning, and chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo for a minimum of, let’s say, ten minutes daily to start with, any of us can experience actual proof of its positive effects in our lives - even if it only makes us feel good on the inside, there will be a definite positive effect. That’s because we’re able to pierce through the thickest layers of our karma and activate our inherent Buddha Nature (our enlightened state). By so doing, we’re then able to bring forth the wisdom and good fortune that we need to challenge, overcome and change our adverse circumstances - turn them into positive ones - or manifest and gain even greater fulfilment in our daily lives from our accumulated good karma. This also allows us to bring forth the wisdom that can free us from the ignorance and stupidity that’s preventing us from accepting and being proud of the person that we indeed are - regardless of our race, colour, gender or sexuality. We’re also able to see and understand our circumstances and the environment far more clearly, as well as attract and connect with any needed external beneficial forces and situations. As I’ve already mentioned, everything is subject to the law of Cause and Effect - the ‘actual-proof-strength’ resulting from chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo always depends on our determination, sincerity and dedication.
    For example, the levels of difference could be compared to making a sound on a piano, creating a melody, producing a great song, and so on. Something else that’s very important to always respect and acknowledge is that the Law (or if you prefer God) is in everyone and everything.
    NB: There are frightening and disturbing sounds, and there are tranquil and relaxing sounds. It’s the emotional result of any noise or sound that can trigger off a mood or even instantly change one. When chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo each day, we are producing a sound vibration that’s the password to our true inner-self - this soon becomes apparent when you start reassessing your views on various things - such as your fears and desires etc. The best way to get the desired result when chanting is not to view things conventionally - rather than reaching out to an external source, we need to reach into our own lives and bring our needs and desires to fruition from within - including the good fortune and strength to achieve any help that we may need. Chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo also reaches out externally and draws us towards, or draws towards us, what we need to make us happy from our environment. For example, it helps us to be in the right place at the right time - to make better choices and decisions and so forth. We need to think of it as a seed within us that we’re watering and bringing sunshine to for it to grow, blossom and bring forth fruit or flowers. It’s also important to understand that everything we need in life, including the answer to every question and the potential to achieve every dream, already exists within us.

  • @justinebjork617
    @justinebjork617 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    All in all, it could be easily explained if our world is a computer simulation and God is its programmer, who then created his own character as Jesus in this simulation.

    • @miguelatkinson
      @miguelatkinson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That sounds like an avatar and that doesn't accurately represent the christian trinitrian veiw at all

  • @tauqirkhan1043
    @tauqirkhan1043 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Think about it for a second, why would God be 1 in 3 and cause such a confusion that defy logic for humans and let us wonder all our life and it makes no sense no matter how hard you try. I do not see any wisdom in that.

    • @davidcrane6593
      @davidcrane6593 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because HE wants us to diligently seek HIM to find TRUTH(is it Truth or not?)-->
      Hebrews 11:6 KJV - But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
      TheTrinity is Truth-->
      1 John 5:7 KJV - For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

    • @eagleeyes6642
      @eagleeyes6642 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Three Manifestations of the SAME PERSON YES....THE BIBLE SAYS JESUS CREATED ALL THINGS SO THAT MEANS HE MUST BE THE SAME PERSON IN GENESIS 1:1.

  • @stephenbarnes9096
    @stephenbarnes9096 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    You need a PhD in intellectual gymnastics to surmise anything concrete from this video. Even with a decent command of metaphor in this discipline, I am totally none the wiser!

    • @samysantarella8287
      @samysantarella8287 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Actually, I understood this quite easily. No PhD.

    • @CroElectroStile
      @CroElectroStile 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      what was unclear, maybe i can help :)

    • @andrewsmith3257
      @andrewsmith3257 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hear people saying that

    • @Cafez27
      @Cafez27 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s impossible to understand. Why? Because quite simply Jesus is not God, why do we look to philosophy for explanation. The apostle Paul himself warned the 1st century Christian’s in Colossae at Colossians 2:8 saying that they should not be taken captive by philosophy and deception. Paul knew, given the growing influence of the Greeks at the time, that this was a real danger. How right he was!!!

    • @subnegro4946
      @subnegro4946 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's just all BS. Grown folks who believe all kinds of nonsense 🤣

  • @markportnoy6290
    @markportnoy6290 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Any God that has hell is ridiculous and unworthy of consideration.

    • @theotormon
      @theotormon 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bible doesn't say that God created existence itself. It seems to imply he came upon it and then worked to shape it. Maybe hell is a pre-existing place or condition that God is trying to save you from.

    • @markportnoy6290
      @markportnoy6290 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theotormon The He should do it. No questions or qualifications. Punishment here is more than enough.

  • @linasmarcinkevicius
    @linasmarcinkevicius 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Jesus, I Trust In You!

    • @linasmarcinkevicius
      @linasmarcinkevicius 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Stefano Portoghesi There are no easy answers! ✨

    • @linasmarcinkevicius
      @linasmarcinkevicius 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Stefano Portoghesi Need to avoid determination about things. Always is a must to ask questions and to deepen understanding and knowledge! ✨

  • @DerekElwell
    @DerekElwell 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mental gymnastics to be a man of god in these day’s. They’ve realized their gap god can no longer be sustained so they’ve retreated to basically just saying, “well yeah just believe in him or don’t because I’m not making any claims, mostly because you debunk every claim we ever said.” The holy version of pleading the 5th.

    • @70AD-user45
      @70AD-user45 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's got nothing to do with mental gymnastics. It's about faith as the New Testament says. You believe whatever nonsense you want to believe, and leave us alone (in the kingdom of heaven) to believe what we believe.

  • @brucephillip6456
    @brucephillip6456 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yes, Jesus is my Lord and my God. Thank you Jesus for Marrying me and Coming into me with your Resurrected Holy Spirit, Fathering me into your son!

  • @ericjohnson6665
    @ericjohnson6665 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    On God and suffering... the fact that Jesus suffered, means that he is sympathetic to our suffering... God, the Father, does something different than what Jesus did... rather than being a separate person, God the Divine Father, sends a fragment of himself into each person who is at that point where they are making moral decisions. Thus God shares all our suffering with us, directly.

  • @michaelkyriacou7026
    @michaelkyriacou7026 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Gnosis
    /ˈnəʊsɪs/
    noun
    knowledge of spiritual mysteries.
    In modern greek it just means 'knowledge'......
    I have to fast forward most of the theists 'theologians',man o man...... Thanks again!! :)

  • @yinchan8924
    @yinchan8924 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think there is a big difference from Identifying with god and just being god.

  • @adams4244
    @adams4244 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If you take this as an intellectual "exercise" it is fascinating. As a piece of actual knowledge, the concepts presented are completely made-up, ethereal, unknowing, non-scientific, esoteric, not only hard to understand - but also almost complete gibberish. It is a shame that us as humans have spent over two Millenia wracking our brains on these sorts of absolute silliness.

  • @lt4954
    @lt4954 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is smething becoming low or something becoming high is a question here. Is something specific possible. Maybe truth of some cosmic tension, presence of cosmic will, even of emerging of energy. What could influence our search. Direction, understanding, trying, being worth of...

  • @ibmor7674
    @ibmor7674 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Sarah is practicing sophistry

    • @JaysonT1
      @JaysonT1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As does Christianity.

  • @davidbible1469
    @davidbible1469 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is a shame that before Jesus was elevated to god status he was wrong about the son of man coming within his cohorts lifetimes. Also, a couple of millennia ago, people believed in different kinds of a Jesus, from adopted human to an entity that looked like man. It is important to consider the history of Christianity and it’s formation complete with the armed battles over whose belief about Jesus is the truth.

  • @johnnyd.5466
    @johnnyd.5466 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Goodness, I wish that the general discourse about religion was always at this level. The false dichotomy between a crude atheism and religious fundamentalism leaves only untenable alternatives. I practice a Christian discipline in worship, fellowship, and prayer, yet I can't really assent to Metaphysical claims as "scientific" truth. In facing the existential horrors endemic to being human, a thinking person just needs a narrative to navigate life. The Christian narrative has the elegance, the humanity, and the philosophical weight to qualify, I think, as the best metanarrative among the available options. I do think it somehow fits scientific facts as a perfect overlay. There's the mystery. In my Christian experience to say that Jesus "is" God means that Jesus is my higher power; following his life and teachings and trying to emulate him is my highest value, my "God." That might not be sufficient for a theologian, but I'll let them work out the nuts and bolts.

  • @wuwu6384
    @wuwu6384 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God is almighty. He can do all things that are not understood by His creation, humans.

  • @tombutler7296
    @tombutler7296 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The mental gymnastics a person must go thru to be a Christian are just incredible. Jesus or Yeshua as he should probably be called was clearly not Christian, he was a Torah observant Jewish prophet. Being a prophet, he followed the Torah as validated by other Jewish prophets and often was in conflict with the traditions of the elders of his day, nothing more nothing less. There does seem to be credible evidence that this man was seen days after his public execution by many people and while this may make him unique among human beings it does not make him God.
    Throughout the OT God presents two tests to all of those he calls to be his servants. The first one is "How many gods are there?" and the second "If we are to truly serve God, do we actually have to do what he tells us to do?" These seem like very straightforward tests to the Jewish mind, but to the Christian mindset, these questions are totally irrelevant.
    Yeshua's audience is quite clear "He only came for the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel." His message was to "Repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand." Or to stop sinning, because a day of reckoning awaits us all much sooner then we imagine. In order to stop sinning, we must understand that sinning is violating any of the 613 laws of the Torah that apply to us and are not invalidated by the Prophets. The patriarchs and the prophets are necessary so that we can discern which laws were given to Moshe by God and which were added by men.
    The NT can and probably should be read very much like the Book of Job in that there is a discussion of opposing concepts of God only one of which can be right. To do this one only needs to first see past the tradition of men in establishing the order of the books of the NT and put them in the order God appears to have had them written in. There is some debate as to which was written first James or Galatians, Galatians can be seen as a response to James but James being a response to Galatians seems much less likely. It appears that both Thessalonians were written after these two and before Matthew and Mark. Mark is said to have been written first simply on the basis that it is shorter, there is also the possibility which appears to me more likely that Matthew was written first and in Hebrew and that Mark was a "translation" into Greek of Matthew's account thru Peter's eyes and Mark's hand. After this comes many letters by Saul/Paul and his friends documenting the creation of a new religion around the worship of a Jewish Prophet that they said opened a new path so that anyone could receive everlasting life thru the Jewish God without having to follow the instructions given by that very God to Moshe. There are also two works by a friend of Paul's named Luke, which is most likely an eyewitness account of Saul/Paul's sometimes false teachings about Yeshua. Jude then writes warning of the hypocrisy within the "Yeshua Movement", and in response, someone writes a second letter under Peter's name attempting to give credibility to the false teaching of Paul. After everyone else is dead John writes a Gospel, three letters and Revelation, lifting Jesus to full God status with his "The word became flesh." The problem with John's testimony is that as a Jew he had to know that only Gentiles would accept his testimony if it did not corroborate the testimony of the other disciples and Yeshua's brother James which he would certainly have had access to.
    If a person is going to follow Yeshua back to God one must first put themselves into a Jewish mindset as to a number of things. Yeshua did not teach out of the NT at all, he had no knowledge of it as it had not been written yet. In his mind, there was never an excuse to add to the Torah and all that one could take away from the Torah was that which had been added by men. We must further understand the whole of the concept of Jewish testimony, that the only valid testimony came from corroborated eyewitnesses. When we look to the NT we see only five possible eyewitnesses to Yeshua's life and ministry, James and Judes two of his brothers and three of his disciples, Matthew, John, and Peter thru the hand of Mark. There are many problems with John's testimony being in conflict with the other Gospels and the letter of James.
    Once we have put ourselves into this mindset we can now see that the New Testament is not about creating a new religion, but calling the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel back to following the instructions given by God to Moshe and not follow the traditions of men. What we today would call a Karaite Jew, as opposed to a Rabbinic Jew.
    If in fact Yeshua was publicly executed and was seen days later by many people it is highly likely that people from all religions would want to follow his teachings. It is also very likely that many people would try to profit from telling people what Yeshua taught, even if they had no direct or even indirect knowledge of his teachings. James' letter is likely a response to rumors of false teachings attributed to his brother that he was trying to correct, it appears to be an open letter to synagogues. Galatians appears to be a response to James' letter to a particular group that may or may not have been associated with a synagogue as opposed to a "church." Matthew and Mark appear to be Jewish eyewitness testimony that has since been corrupted in some obvious ways and for obvious purposes. (The birth narrative and the trial narratives as these witnesses would not have testified to things to which they could have had no direct knowledge and the Eucharist as it appears first in a writing attributed to Paul and is so counter to Jewish thinking as to drive all thinking Jews away, come to mind.) Other than James, Matthew, Mark and the book of Jude the rest of the NT should be read in the same light as Job's friends. They do not speak well of God.
    If you are a Christian and you have gotten this far please answer this question for me, or at least for yourself. If Jesus is God incarnate why did he have to send someone a few years later, Paul, to change or even elaborate on what he said?"
    If you are a "Westerner" and do not believe in the God of the Bible at all, then you probably actually follow a religion you may have never heard of called scientism. You likely put as much faith in men and women in lab coats as Christians put into their clergy. I would propose to you this challenge. The OT is clearly a "flat earth" book if scientism is true and God is a lie where is the curve? Go find it for yourself, look across any very large body of water with a telescope and see if that ship disappearing "over the horizon" does not come right back into view when you look thru the telescope. If you can perform this simple experiment and come to the conclusion that you live on anything other than a flat plain you are doing more mental gymnastics than the "Christians" do!
    Shalom

  • @cliverobert9891
    @cliverobert9891 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    God is Light !

  • @samuelarthur887
    @samuelarthur887 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The fact is, "starting with the cosmos" is similar to "starting with Jesus", in that He became part of it and in it revealed God!

    • @riru363
      @riru363 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Smart

    • @loganbranjord7855
      @loganbranjord7855 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah this is way easier to understand through eastern religions how Jesus became god then it makes sense

    • @andrebrown8969
      @andrebrown8969 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@riru363 But is it truth?

    • @josegaleano1530
      @josegaleano1530 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andrebrown8969 yes is truth bullshit

    • @andrebrown8969
      @andrebrown8969 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@josegaleano1530 What? Religion is not truth, just ideas humans make up.

  • @dennyworthington6641
    @dennyworthington6641 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Right, ladies and gentlemen, now that we've sorted out the phenomenon of a divine Jesus in a clear and unambiguous fashion, we can turn our attention to much more probable phenomena like the existence of the tooth fairy or the recently reported sighting of Santa's sleigh over Manhattan.

  • @rmphotoart
    @rmphotoart 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The excellent arguments presented in these interviews are based on the Bible, the belief that the Bible is the word of God. Once you remove God from the equation, that he inspired the authors of scripture, you are left with fallible human men laying the foundation of Christian belief.

    • @miguelatkinson
      @miguelatkinson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah because it was

  • @MrLibranda
    @MrLibranda 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is where the trinity collapses. Bearing in mind that the source story is that of the gods in plural thus elohim, the story of the trinity became a necessity to counter the idea that there was really a council of gods. The monotheist incists that there were three during the narration of "let us make man in our image". Three personages of one god. if you buy this, then you are a candidate for becoming a true believer. Not knowing the story of the polytheistic gods of the Sumerians, even the story of the Anunnaki, one would really be duped into believing the story of the trinity.

    • @joop6463
      @joop6463 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The devil and his demons want to be like God, thats why they make false religions such as islam and hinduism. So that when the idolaters think they are worshipping gods they are actually worshipping a demon.

  • @demej00
    @demej00 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Maybe Jesus is like water/ice - in certain circumstances he is human/God and what causes the shift in nature is who he is interacting with, his environment which collapses his wave-function.

    • @loganbranjord7855
      @loganbranjord7855 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good example. Spirituality works like this for those who reach deep in and clear out or transcend

    • @nonprogrediestregredi1711
      @nonprogrediestregredi1711 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or maybe, just maybe, this is based upon archaic superstitions. That is the more likely scenario.

    • @semigloss
      @semigloss 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Except H2O can’t be both solid and liquid simultaneously, which is core to the Trinitarian Christian claim.

    • @yeolee2703
      @yeolee2703 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In spirit or in flesh?
      Renew your mind in the correct domain.
      See yet not knowing
      Hear yet not understanding
      A few may find the narrow door
      Many did not see yet believe, blessed are these.

    • @blackmamba-te4td
      @blackmamba-te4td 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@loganbranjord7855 u don't have to dive deep for the truth. U dive in abyss. Please accept Muhammad saw as a true messenger bcz he testified that jesus was real and he was close to God and he was born without father and that he was taken to heaven and he will return. God sent a message to you saying simple truth. Jesus is not God. God is One. He has no partners no sons no daughters. If u still wouldn't believe. Hell is the place for you

  • @Kim-lc3fv
    @Kim-lc3fv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I had heard in another documentary that within the Church Jesus did not become God until around the 2nd century and/or in the reign of Augustus. This made it easier for the Church and/or emperor to "control" the members. I wonder how all of those theologians deal with such claims.

    • @cso6060
      @cso6060 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well they would dismiss this because even Atheist New testament Scholar agree that the confession of the risen Jesus was shortly in max 2 years after bis crucifiction. And there are extra Biblical sources like Roman historians, who says Jesus was praised as Lord and God from his followers in 100 AD. So Yeah they would just dismiss this, because of historical facts.

    • @Ekam-Sat
      @Ekam-Sat 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The true meaning of the word Jesus is Ⅎ˥ƎSƎNO

    • @writereducator
      @writereducator 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Those theologians" dealt with "those claims" by knowing something about history. For example, Augustus died in AD 14.

    • @Kim-lc3fv
      @Kim-lc3fv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@writereducator My mistake. Then not Augustus. I am not a student of ancient Roman history. 😉

  • @publiusovidius7386
    @publiusovidius7386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I want a discussion of the twin births of Dionysus who was snatched from the burning womb of Semele and sewn into the thigh of Zeus. It is Dionysus who promises eternal life.

    • @glennsimonsen8421
      @glennsimonsen8421 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very late to the party. The 19th century saw religious philosophers excavating all the ancient Greek and Mesopotamian myths and gods digging for parallels to Christ as a way of saying there's nothing new about Christianity. Today this line of argument has been long abandoned by academics because there are no parallels to Jesus of Christianity which hold up under scrutiny. These meritless comparisons are repeated today not by academics but by unsourced claims on the internet. Jesus of Nazareth was a historical figure geared into the history of ancient Palestine.

  • @Ekam-Sat
    @Ekam-Sat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jesus is God is One and... One's Purpose is Love.

  • @DrTalentHunter
    @DrTalentHunter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    24:20 robert, you're not listening... you were just told that jesus never claimed to be god 3:13... he is a son of god (and so are you)... there are so many people out there who propose the best way to smile -- maybe you should actually look at the scripture sometime! thanks for all the great videos

    • @digiswitch
      @digiswitch 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Floyd thanks floyd, by the way - where do we come from? of course we come from out father and mother.. (and they the same)! our father's and mothers are the cause of us all... and i believe that jehovah was the great father of all humanity -- literally!

    • @invisiblechurch9621
      @invisiblechurch9621 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1:14 The Word became flesh and made His dwelling among us. We have seen His glory, the glory of the one and only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.

    • @DrTalentHunter
      @DrTalentHunter 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@invisiblechurch9621 the glory of the one and only Son from the Father i am sure jesus is ticked off because we worship him more than we do the father, the entire deal is about his father from the ancients right through till today... and of course he is god

    • @invisiblechurch9621
      @invisiblechurch9621 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DrTalentHunter Probably but the gospel of John clearly says he is god

  • @booboodadfool8015
    @booboodadfool8015 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The current Christian conception of God as Man could be so great and transformative if realized by the majority. Think about it....the most divine thing we could do is to embrace our collective humanity. To throw away the distinctions of old and to say we need each other. The gospel basically says that if a man is given the power of god the best thing he could do is be a good man. Something we all can do. Jesus suffered to show that we all suffer, and we have to use that suffering to mitigate the suffering of others. It's quite that simple.

    • @danielespejo375
      @danielespejo375 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thats kinda one of the aspects of his mission, but to say thats the end goal is wrong. Jesus never taught that mankind could be good if they embraced eachothers suffering, he rather taught that mankind cannot have a change of heart on their own since man is immoral so is his suffering a result of his immorality, there is no mitigation in that. He rather said that it is His suffering alone that could guide mankind to a better future, since he is the embodiment of the ultimate good that had suffered the ultimate injustice for the sake of the creators of such injustice (us); thus showing an unmatchable virtue

    • @miguelatkinson
      @miguelatkinson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@danielespejo375if man is immoral by nature why make human beings with such a nature in the first if he is omnipotent?